Guelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study

Similar documents
671 Victoria Road North City of Guelph Traffic Noise Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

Noise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario

Noise Assessment Report

Noise Assessment Report Riverside Drive Phase I

DCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 361 Tanbark Road Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

Fayez & Patrizia Ghadban

Noise Feasibility Study Stacked Townhouse Development Glenashton Drive (Block 55) Oakville, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 9-4 CITY OF OTTAWA

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Building 103 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario

Noise Assessment Report

Noise Assessment Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

Table of Contents... ii 1. Introduction... 1

Noise Feasibility Study, McGibbon Condominium 71 Main Street South Georgetown, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 12 HAMILTON AVENUE NORTH OTTAWA, ON.

NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...

Prepared for: Gapatas Inc Sherwoodtowne Boulevard, Unit 106 Mississauga, ON L4Z 1Y5. Our File No:

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON.

Noise Control Feasibility Study 173 / 175 / 177 Preston Street Ottawa, Ontario

Mann Avenue Development 87 Mann Avenue Noise Control Study

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

Noise Assessment & Control Transportation Noise Assessment 303 Lebreton Street South, 460 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Hospice 2050 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario

Traffic Noise Assessment Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario

Table of Contents. 174 Forward Avenue SACL Project #B7-170 Feb 22, Page ii

Avalon Encore Stage Tenth Line Road Infusion Terrace, Block 233 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Noise Control Study. for. Avalon Public School Portobello Boulevard at Stormwind Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario. Revision 1

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Brigil Homes. Noise Impact Assessment. Type of Document Site Plan Submission. Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2. Project Number OTT A0

Noise Feasibility Study 2120 Hurontario Street and Grange Drive City of Mississauga, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REVISED with ADDENDUM for ROOFTOP OUTDOOR LIVING AREA

Traffic Noise Assessment. 5 Orchard Drive. Stittsville, Ontario

Transportation Noise & Vibration Assessment Scott Street. Ottawa, Ontario

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT RIVERSIDE SOUTH PHASE 13 CITY OF OTTAWA

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

REP Fotenn Bank Phase 1 Feasibility Noise Study with Building Component AmendmentPage 1 of 21

NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Stacked Townhouse Development, 3060 and 3072 Sixth Line, Town of Oakville, Ontario

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 20 MARK AVENUE

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 4 Storey Apartment Building 226 Woolwich Street South Breslau, Regional Municipality of Waterloo

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MCGANN 9a LANDS BANK STREET LEITRIM DEVELOPMENT AREA

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Ironwood Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY OF PROPOSED PHASE 2 CONDOMINIUMS AT 655 & 755 ANAND PRIVATE OTTAWA Ontario Inc.

Roadway Traffic Noise and Vibration Assessment. The Bridge Wesleyan Church Addition. Ottawa, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Traffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

18 McArthur Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario Proposed Development Noise Study Report. Prepared for: Takyan Consulting By: ARCH-Nova Design Inc.

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT CLARIDGE HOMES MAPLE GROVE LANDS 1981 MAPLE GROVE ROAD KANATA WEST

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1208 OLD MONTREAL ROAD

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Stationary Noise Assessment. 70 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 364 ST. PATRICK STREET

Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC GREENBANK ROAD NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Environmental Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE MEADOWS IN HALF MOON BAY PHASE 5

ASSESSMENT OF THE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS AT THE PROPOSED HOLIDAY INN DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE

Noise Control Study. Proposed Mixed-use Development. 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa. Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments

R. BOUWMEESTER & ASSOCIATES

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

Proposed Residential/Institutional Development Independent and Assisted Care Senior s Residence 190 Richmond Road Ottawa, ON K1Z 6W6

NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6

Attachment A: Background Noise Assessment for Brandon Thermal Generating Station

Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario

Tri-County Aggregates Ltd. 92 Kenhar Drive North York, Ontario, Canada M9L 1N2

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

1. Introduction Site Noise Impact... 1

3.5.1 Outdoor Living Areas (OLAs) Indoor Sound Levels... 8

Environmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON

SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers

Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario

Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Kemsley Farm St. Thomas, Ontario

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED PLANTAGENET ASPHALT PLANT

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario

The anticipated critical noise receptors and their locations are identified as follows and are shown on Figure 3:

REP Atelier 292 OCH Phase 2 Noise Study Page 1 of 26

23, 33 & 39 DEERFOX DRIVE NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Hotel Development, Living Waters Resort Collingwood, Ontario

ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Burnett Lands Greenbank Road. Noise Impact Feasibility Report

DRAFT REPORT. Boyne East Catholic Secondary School #3CSS. Noise Impact Study. Louis St. Laurent Avenue, Milton. SACL #SW18060A0 December 11, 2018

For The Regional Municipality of Waterloo 150 Frederick Street, 8 th Floor Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4J3. Prepared by. Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng

Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario

Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Appendix M. Noise Assessment

Traffic and Stationary Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Lakeside Village Plaza 5353 Lakeshore Road Burlington, Ontario

Noise Abatement Guidelines. Regional Official Plan Guidelines

Transcription:

Guelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study Development Location Prepared For: Guelph Curling Club Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. 43 Forest Road Cambridge ON N1S 3B4 pgrubb@ptsl.com 1.519.896.3163 Fax: 1.866.722.5117

PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT NAME:... GUELPH CURLING CLUB DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NOISE STUDY CLIENT:... GUELPH CURLING CLUB C/O THE LANDPLAN COLLABORATIVE LIMITED OWEN R. SCOTT 319 WOOLWICH STREET GUELPH, ON N1H 3W4 CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER:... OWEN R. SCOTT. CONSULTANT:... PARADIGM TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS LIMITED 43 FOREST ROAD CAMBRIDGE, ON N1S 3B4 PH: 519-896-3163 FAX: 1-866-722-5117 CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER... PHIL GRUBB, P.ENG. REPORT DATE:... SEPTEMBER 2013 PROJECT NUMBER:... 130890

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENT Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited (Paradigm) was retained by Guelph Curling Club through The Landplan Collaborative Limited to conduct a Traffic Noise Study for development of the lands owned by the club in order to rezone the lands to permit development of existing vacant land for commercial and residential use. The lands are located on Woolwich Street (Hwy 6) approximately 350 metres north of Woodlawn Road West in the north part of the City of Guelph, Ontario. The purpose and scope of this study is to address the traffic noise impacts and mitigation measures in order to meet the Guidelines of the Ministry of Environment and satisfy the requirements of the City of Guelph. CONCLUSIONS The following is concluded based on the above: 1. The rear yards of all residential units are west of the 60 dba Day contour indicating that noise levels in the rear yard recreation area will be less than 60 dba or within 5 dba of the MOE guideline of 55 dba. Therefore, all units east of the 55 dba guideline will require a Type A warning clause (i.e. the most easterly building). 2. The units east of the 50 dba contour (all of the units in the easterly building except for the most westerly residential unit) are located between the 50 dba and the 60 dba Night contour indicating that the indoor noise levels are expected to be under 10 dba of the MOE guideline. Therefore, these units will require provision for air conditioning and a Type C warning clause. 3. The southeast corner of the most easterly unit are expected to have daytime noise levels of 61 dba which falls within the 55 dba to 65 dba range of the MOE guideline for living rooms indicating that provision for air conditioning and a Type C warning clause will be required. RECOMMENDATIONS That the following warning clauses be included on the purchase or rental agreements for all units in the easterly building except for the most westerly unit which will require a Type A warning clause only. The warning clauses are as follows: 1. TYPE A:"Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality's and the Ministry of the Environment's noise criteria." 2. TYPE C: "Purchasers/tenants are advised that this dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality's and the Ministry of the Environment's noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air conditioning device should be done so as to comply with noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts both on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.)" Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page i

CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... I 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 OVERVIEW... 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY... 2 2.1 NOISE PREDICTION MODEL... 2 2.2 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS... 2 3.0 NOISE LEVEL FORECASTS AND MITIGATION... 3 3.1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN... 3 3.2 TRAFFIC NOISE GUIDELINES... 3 NOISE LEVEL CRITERION... 3 ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE CONTROL MEASURES... 3 3.3 NOISE LEVEL IMPACTS... 4 MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS... 5 APPENDICES APPENDIX A NOISE LEVEL FORECASTS Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page ii

FIGURES FIGURE 1.1: DEVELOPMENT LOCATION... 1 FIGURE 2.1: HISTORICAL AND FORECAST SADT GROWTH- HWY. 6 NORTH GUELPH CITY LIMITS... 2 FIGURE 3.1: NOISE CONTOURS AND MITIGATION MEASURES... 6 TABLES TABLE 3.1: MOE RESIDENTIAL SOUND LEVEL CRITERION FOR ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE... 3 TABLE 3.2: SUMMARY OF MOE OUTDOOR TRAFFIC NOISE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS... 4 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited (Paradigm) was retained by Guelph Curling Club through The Landplan Collaborative Limited to conduct a Traffic Noise Study for development of the lands owned by the club in order to rezone the lands to permit development of existing vacant land for commercial and residential use. The lands are located on Woolwich Street (Hwy 6) approximately 350 metres north of Woodlawn Road West in the north part of the City of Guelph, Ontario. The location is shown in Figure 1.1. The site, when fully built out, is expected to include 31 townhouse units and 3907 m 2 of various commercial uses. Accordingly, this report addresses traffic noise from Woolwich Street (Hwy. 6) where the proposed residential development will be affected by noise from this roadway. 1.2 Study. The purpose and scope of this study is to address the traffic noise impacts and mitigation measures in order to meet the Guidelines of the Ministry of Environment and satisfy the requirements of the City of Guelph. Figure 1.1: Development Location North Development Location Study Area Existing Smart Centre Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 1

2.0 METHODOLOGY The following describes the assumptions used to address the noise attenuation requirements for the development. The latest historical traffic volumes and characteristics were obtained from a 2009 traffic count at the intersection of Woolwich Street and Woodlawn Road and the Provincial Highway Traffic Volumes (PHTV) 1988-2010 report The noise projections were based on traffic volumes and growth rates derived from the PHTV. 2.1 Noise Prediction Model STAMSON 5 was used to calculate the noise levels adjacent to and within the development. STAMSON is the traffic noise prediction model developed and utilized by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE). It calculates the 24-hour and day/night Leq noise levels (i.e. equivalent noise level) based on inputs for traffic volume, type and speed, noise source-receiver distance, topography and elevation change between source and receiver, road surface type and gradient, and noise source and receiver heights and locations. 2.2 Traffic and Roadway Conditions The principal traffic noise source in proximity to the development is Woolwich Street (Hwy. 6). This roadway is a four lane road in the study area with a posted speed of 70 km per hour. The grade of the road is 1.5% based on the mapping available. The 2009 City of Guelph intersection count at Woolwich Street and Woodlawn Road indicated that trucks represent about 5% of the total traffic. A four hour sample classification count between 7:00 AM and 11:00 AM indicates that about 46% of the total truck traffic consists of Medium Trucks while 54% consists of Heavy Trucks. The PHTV report indicates that traffic volumes have grown by an average of 320 vehicles per day per year on Hwy. 6 at the Guelph north City limits as shown in the chart below. Also shown are the assumed future 10 year traffic characteristics for the purpose of traffic noise forecasts based on the above and 13 years of growth between 2010 and 2023. Figure 2.1: Historical and Forecast SADT Growth- Hwy. 6 North Guelph City Limits 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Historical Growth Average Annual Growth (320/Year) Actual SADT Future Traffic Assumptions Woolwich Traffic Characteristics Street Year 2010 SADT 19,100 Annual Average Growth 320 2023 SADT 23,260 Percent Trucks 5.0% Percent Medium Trucks 2.3% Percent Heavy Trucks 2.7% Future Speed Limit (km/hr) 70 Grade (%) 2% Day/Night Split 90/10 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 2

3.0 NOISE LEVEL FORECASTS AND MITIGATION 3.1 Development Plan The residential units are located on the north part of the development area with the most easterly unit located about 57m from the centre line of Woolwich Street. At this stage of the development no grading plans were available. 3.2 Traffic Noise Guidelines Noise Level Criterion The Ministry of Environment provides guidelines for traffic noise levels adjacent to residential development. 1 In order to comply with the Ministry s guidelines in residential areas, the predicted noise level is to be assessed in an Outdoor Living Area such as a rear yard or patio and in indoor living areas such as bedrooms and living rooms. Where the noise levels exceed applicable criteria, warning clauses and mitigation measures such as site planning, architectural design, noise barriers, special building components and/or central air conditioning may be necessary. Table 3.1 gives the recommended sound level guidelines and applicable time periods developed by the MOE. The indoor noise levels apply with the windows and doors open. The MOE assumes that the building walls attenuate outdoor noise levels by 10 dba. No noise control measures are therefore required when the sound level estimated in the Outdoor Living Area is 55 dba or less during the daytime and 50 dba or less in the plane of the bedroom window during the nighttime. TABLE 3.1: MOE RESIDENTIAL SOUND LEVEL CRITERION FOR ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE Location Type of Space Time Period Leq dba) Guideline Outdoor Rear Yard or Patio 16hr, 7:00-23:00 55 Indoor Living Dining Area 16hr, 7:00-23:00 45 (55) Indoor Sleeping Quarters 8 hr, 23:00-7:00 40 (50) Note: bracketed numbers refer to equivalent outdoor level in window plane For the purpose of noise impact assessment in an Outdoor Living Area using the MOE guidelines, the sound level calculations are typically performed at a location 3m from the rear of the building façade for outdoor noise levels at 1.5m above the ground and at the building façade for indoor sound levels. Noise control measures for Outdoor Living Areas typically also help to meet guidelines for ground floor living/dining room areas of most low-density residential dwellings. Indoor sound levels tend to be guided by nighttime sound level calculations performed in the plane of a second storey bedroom window typically 4.5m above the ground unless the dwelling is a multi-storey building. Road Traffic Noise Control Measures 1 Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning, Publication LU131, Ministry of Environment and Energy, October 1995. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 3

The MOE has developed guidelines for noise mitigation and control as summarized in Table 3.2 below. The wording of the various warning clauses have been developed by MOE for each type indicated below. Note that all noise levels relate to outdoor noise levels at the building façade meaning indoor noise levels will be approximately dba less. TABLE 3.2: SUMMARY OF MOE OUTDOOR TRAFFIC NOISE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS Location Day/Night Leq Control Measures Warning Clause Outdoor Living <55dBA Not required None Area 55-60 dba Not required but desirable Type A Leq (16hr) >60 dba Control measures (barriers) req d Type B Plane of Living 50 55 dba Not required None Room Window 55-65 dba Provision for air conditioning, Building compliant with Type C Leq (16hr) Ontario Building Code >65 dba Central air conditioning, Building components designed to Type D Plane of Bedroom Window Leq (8 hr) 3.3 Noise Level Impacts achieve indoor sound level criteria <50 dba Not required None 50-60 dba Provision for air conditioning, Building compliant with Type C Ontario Building Code >60 Central air conditioning, Building components designed to Type D achieve indoor sound level criteria Based on the above traffic and roadway characteristics, initial computations were performed to determine the location of critical outdoor noise contour lines from the Woolwich Street centerline based on the table above as follows: 1. 60 dba Day- 57m residential rear yard recreation area noise levels west of this line do not require noise barriers but a require noise warning clause when located east of the 55 dba Day noise contour. 2. 60 dba Night- 24m- residential buildings located west of this line do not require special acoustical building materials but require a noise warning clause when located east of the 50 dba Night noise contour. 3..55 dba Day- 113.5m - residential rear yard recreation areas west of this line require no mitigation 4. 50 dba Night- 103m- residential buildings west of this line require no mitigation Figure 3.1 illustrates the various contour lines noted above. Appendix A provides the supporting calculations produced by Stamson. A further calculation was conducted at the southeast corner of the most easterly residential unit which is east of the 60 dba day contour indicating that projected noise levels were 61 dba for Daytime Noise at 1.5m observer height and 55 dba for the 4.5m window height. The following is concluded based on the above: 1. The rear yards of all residential units are west of the 60 dba Day contour indicating that noise levels in the rear yard recreation area will be less than 60 dba or within 5 dba of the MOE guideline of 55 dba. Therefore, all units east of the 55 dba guideline will require a Type A warning clause (i.e. the most easterly building) as per Table 3.2. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 4

2. The units east of the 50 dba contour (all of the units in the easterly building except for the most westerly residential unit) are located between the 50 dba and the 60 dba Night contour indicating that the indoor noise levels are expected to be under 10 dba of the MOE guideline. Therefore, these units will require provision for air conditioning and a Type C warning clause as per Table 3.2. 3. The southeast corner of the most easterly unit is expected to have daytime noise levels of 61 dba which falls within the 55 dba to 65 dba range of the MOE guideline for living rooms indicating that provision for air conditioning and a Type C warning clause will be required as per Table 3.2. It is noted that the noise level forecast are conservative given that the effect of buildings on the site have not been considered. In particular the residential units themselves serve as noise barriers for the rear yard recreation area as noise caused by traffic on Woolwich Street to the south is shielded. All common amenity areas are west of the 60 dba Day contour and are partially shielded by the buildings. Mitigation Requirements Accordingly, all units within the most easterly building will require a Type A warning clause and all units within the most easterly building except the most westerly unit will also require a Type C warning clause on agreements of purchase or rental. The warning clauses are as follows: 3. TYPE A:"Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality's and the Ministry of the Environment's noise criteria." 4. TYPE C: "Purchasers/tenants are advised that this dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality's and the Ministry of the Environment's noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air conditioning device should be done so as to comply with noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts both on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.)" Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 5

1. Figure 3.1: Noise Contours and Mitigation Measures Figure 3.1 Free Field Noise Contours and Mitigation Measures Guelph Curling Club NIS Paradigm www.ptsl.com Units Requiring Noise Warning Clause Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 6

Appendix A Noise Level Forecasts Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 7

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 16-09-2013 15:32:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: 60 dba Day and 60 dba Night Contours Road data, segment # 1: (day/night) ------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 19866/2207 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 502/56 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 565/63 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 2 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 23260 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 10.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 2.40 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.70 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 90.00 Data for Segment # 1: (day/night) ---------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 57.00 / 24.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: (day) --------------------------- Source height = 1.28 m ROAD (0.00 + 59.96 + 0.00) = 59.96 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.66 71.04 0.00-9.62-1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.96 Segment Leq : 59.96 dba Total Leq All Segments: 59.96 dba Results segment # 1: (night) ----------------------------- Source height = 1.28 m ROAD (0.00 + 59.99 + 0.00) = 59.99 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.58 64.52 0.00-3.22-1.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.99 Segment Leq : 59.99 dba Total Leq All Segments: 59.99 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 59.96 (NIGHT): 59.99 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 8

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 16-09-2013 15:28:57 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: 55 dba Day and 50 dba Night Contours oad data, segment # 1: (day/night) ------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 19866/2207 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 502/56 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 565/63 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 2 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 23260 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 10.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 2.40 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.70 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 90.00 Data for Segment # 1: (day/night) ---------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 113.50 / 103.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: (day) --------------------------- Source height = 1.28 m ROAD (0.00 + 55.00 + 0.00) = 55.00 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.66 71.04 0.00-14.59-1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 Segment Leq : 55.00 dba Total Leq All Segments: 55.00 dba Results segment # 1: (night) ----------------------------- Source height = 1.28 m ROAD (0.00 + 50.01 + 0.00) = 50.01 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.58 64.52 0.00-13.19-1.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.01 Segment Leq : 50.01 dba Total Leq All Segments: 50.01 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 55.00 (NIGHT): 50.01 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 9

STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 17-09-2013 22:45:54 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Station 1 Figure 3.1- South East Building Corner Road data, segment # 1: (day/night) ------------------------------------ Car traffic volume : 19866/2207 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 502/56 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 565/63 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 2 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 23260 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 10.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 2.40 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.70 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 90.00 Data for Segment # 1: (day/night) ---------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 50.90 / 50.90 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: (day) --------------------------- Source height = 1.28 m ROAD (0.00 + 60.78 + 0.00) = 60.78 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.66 71.04 0.00-8.81-1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.78 Segment Leq : 60.78 dba Total Leq All Segments: 60.78 dba Results segment # 1: (night) ----------------------------- Source height = 1.28 m ROAD (0.00 + 54.84 + 0.00) = 54.84 dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq -90 90 0.58 64.52 0.00-8.37-1.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.84 Segment Leq : 54.84 dba Total Leq All Segments: 54.84 dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 60.78 (NIGHT): 54.84 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 10

Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited Page 11