South Africa is ranked 58th in the GII 2018, dropping 1 position from last year.

Similar documents
Nigeria is ranked 118th in the GII 2018, moving up 1 position from last year.

Senegal is ranked 100th in the GII 2018, the same position as last year.

Rwanda is ranked 99th in the GII 2018, the same position as last year.

Germany is ranked 9th in the GII 2018, the same position as in 2017.

Malaysia is ranked 35th in the GII 2018, moving up 2 positions from the previous year.

Cameroon is ranked 111th in the GII 2018, moving up 6 positions from last year.

Thailand is ranked 44th in the GII 2018, moving up 7 positions from the previous year.

The GII indicators are grouped into innovation inputs and outputs. The following table reflects Luxembourg s ranking over time 1.

The Netherlands is ranked 2nd in the GII 2018, moving up 1 position from the previous year.

Egypt is ranked 95th in the GII 2018, moving up 10 positions from the previous year.

Ireland is ranked 10th in the GII 2018, same position as the previous year.

Sri Lanka is ranked 88th in the GII 2018, moving up 2 positions from the previous year.

Mexico is ranked 56th in the GII 2018, moving up 2 positions from the previous year.

Uruguay is ranked 62nd in the GII 2018, moving up 5 positions from the previous year.

Chile is ranked 47th in the GII 2018, moving down 1 position from the previous year.

Jamaica is ranked 81st in the GII 2018, moving up 3 positions from the previous year.

Kuwait is ranked 60th in the GII 2018, moving down 4 positions from last year.

Serbia is ranked 55th in the GII 2018, moving up 7 positions from the previous year.

Australia is ranked 20th in the GII 2018, moving up 3 positions from the previous year.

Bulgaria is ranked 37th in the GII 2018, dropping 1 position from the previous year.

Islamic Republic of Iran

Hungary is ranked 33rd in the GII 2018, moving up 6 positions from the previous year.

Japan is ranked 13th in the GII 2018, moving up 1 position from the previous year.

France is ranked 16th in the GII 2018, moving down 1 position from the previous year.

APPENDIX 1. Country/Economy Profiles

Country/Economy Profiles

Country Brief Global Innovation Index 2017: Morocco

Briefing for Australian Media. Global Innovation Index 2014


ADJUSTMENTS TO THE GLOBAL INNOVATION INDEX FRAMEWORK AND YEAR-ON- YEAR COMPARABILITY OF RESULTS

COUNTRY PROFILE. Sweden

COUNTRY PROFILE. Jordan

COUNTRY PROFILE. Denmark

COUNTRY PROFILE. Iceland

COUNTRY PROFILE. Slovak Republic

COUNTRY PROFILE. Turkey

COUNTRY PROFILE. China Mainland

COMMITTED TO IMPROVING THE STATE OF THE WORLD

COUNTRY PROFILE. Singapore

Science, Technology and Innovation in Egypt Status Brief

WORLD COMPETITIVENESS RANKING 2018

Brand South Africa Research Note

Benchmarking Innovation Outperformance at the Global and Country Levels

Measuring Competitiveness: The case of Hungary Christos Cabolis Chief Economist, IMD World Competitiveness Center

Third Pillar: Knowledge, Innovation and Scientific Research

Effective Innovation Policies for Development the Strategic Role of TTOs

METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPLES OF ANALYSIS

HUMAN CAPACITY BUILDING: EDUCATION, VOCATIONAL AND SKILLED LABOR PROMOTING POLICIES

NATIONAL KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

The Global Innovation Index 2017 Innovation Feeding the World. Composite Indicators and Scoreboards Community of Practice 9 November 2017

Part 3 Competitiveness Profiles

Measuring National Knowledge Assets:

Evidence-based policymaking for innovation, competitiveness and industrial modernisation

National Competitiveness Council publishes Ireland s Competitiveness Scorecard 2017

Contents. 1. Introduction Jordan and the GTCI Jordan s Strongest and Weakest Sub-Indicators Policy Recommendations...

GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS AND INDIA: CURRENT TRENDS AND OPPORTUNITIES

The Innovation Union Scoreboard: Monitoring the innovation performance of the 27 EU Member States

COMPARISON OF INDIA AND CHINA BASED ON GLOBAL TALENT COMPETITIVENESS INDEX

Higher Education & Economic Development: Comparing Kenya, Mauritius, South Africa

POSITION OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN COMPETITIVENESS RANKINGS

Hinrich Foundation Sustainable Trade Index Laos Highlights

Measuring Innovation in Agriculture and Food Systems

MALAYSIA S PRODUCTIVITY CHALLENGE: IN WHAT WAYS CAN MALAYSIA INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY TO REMAIN COMPETITIVE by HJ. SHAMSUDDIN BARDAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

ACHIEVING COMPETITIVENESS, INCLUSIVE GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY IN REAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA: THE TOUGH CHOICES IN AN ERA OF CHANGE

METHODOLOGICAL NOTES

National Competitiveness Council s Productivity Statement Productivity Statement 2018

INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY IN ARAB SME S

EVALUATING SLOVAKIA S COMPETITIVENESS IN THE EU

Key Findings of the GII 2017

Identification of Content of International Benchmarking and Field Survey

What we know (and don t know) about economic growth in New Zealand. Strategic Policy Branch

Report insights presentation - perspective on Bulgaria

2014 TAFTIE Policy Forum Measuring innovation. Can we measure innovation? Lessons from innovation scoreboards

Factors of Economic Innovative Development: Cross-Country Evidence

Accounting for Progress: How to Measure Innovation and Entrepreneurship

2014 African Transformation Report Growth with Depth. Dr. Yaw Ansu Chief Economist, ACET

The Future of Industry in Europe

Exploring the Relationship Between Higher Education and Knowledge Economy Indicators

Global Production, Outsourcing, and Logistics

RAASR: Economy Priorities and Progress Assessment Measures Viet Nam

ENABLING ENVIRONMENTS FOR SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISES

INNOSCORECARD. InnoScores. for Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia / BalkanMed Region. 13/11/ P a g e

A systematic MIT approach for assessing innovation-driven entrepreneurship in ecosystems

Addressing low productivity by improving firm quality of management in Turkey ISTANBUL, TURKEY CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTIVITY

Hinrich Foundation Sustainable Trade Index Brunei Highlights

SUPPORT FOR AN INNOVATION POLICY AGENDA

1.0 Overview. Factors Affecting Botswana s Competitiveness. Dr. Grace Goitsemodimo Tabengwa (Being Printed for Dissemination)

THE CHOICE OF INDICATORS IN THE LISBON ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK (LAF)

2017 HLFP Thematic Review of SDG-9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation 1

G20 Enhanced Structural Reform Agenda

GLOBAL PARIS PROFILING THE REGION S INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS AND CONNECTIONS

Supporting Scalable, Innovation Led, Enterprise.

Table 3: The Global Competitiveness Index rankings and comparisons

Global Enabling Trade Report 2010

Which of these pictures accurately shows the country of Jamaica?

Factors determining the position in the ranking of innovative countries

Global Production and Supply Chain Management

Education. Thailand: Challenges and Options for 2011 and Beyond. Towards a Growth-Sustaining Education Sector. Education and Growth in Thailand

(FDI can help a host country to achieve a current account surplus.)

ENTERPRISE SURVEYS WHAT BUSINESSES EXPERIENCE. Lesotho 2016 Country Profile ENTERPRISE SURVEYS

Transcription:

South Africa 58 th South Africa is ranked 58th in the GII 2018, dropping 1 position from last year. The GII indicators are grouped into innovation inputs and outputs. The following table reflects South Africa s rankings over time 1. South Africa s ranking over time GII Input Output Efficiency 2018 58 48 65 83 2017 57 49 69 97 2016 54 47 71 99 South Africa performs better in innovation inputs than outputs. It improves in innovation inputs this year, moving up 1 spot to the 48th position, after seeing a 2- position drop last year. Over the last three years, South Africa has consistently advanced in innovation outputs, reaching the 65th position, up from 69th in 2017 and the 71st in 2016. South Africa also shows an upward trend in the Innovation Efficiency Ratio, which moves to the 83rd global position, up from the 97th in 2017 and 99th in 2016. Relative to its GII position (58th), South Africa s Efficiency Ratio (83rd) ranks rather low, indicating that improving its efficiency in translating innovation inputs into outputs is an area of opportunity for the country. 13 th South Africa is ranked 13th among the 34 upper-middle income countries in the GII 2018. 1 st South Africa is the most innovative economy in Sub-Saharan Africa. 1 Note that year-on-year comparisons of the GII ranks are imperfect and influenced by changes in the GII model and data availability.

Benchmarking South Africa to other upper-middle-income countries and the Sub-Saharan Africa region South Africa s scores by area Upper-middle-income countries South Africa has high scores in 4 of the 7 GII areas Institutions, Market Sophistication, Business Sophistication, and Knowledge & Technology Outputs, in which it scores above the average of the upper-middle-income group. Top scores in areas such as Regulatory environment, Trade, competition & market scale, Knowledge workers, and Knowledge impact are behind these high rankings. Sub-Saharan Africa region Compared to other countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, South Africa performs above-average in all 7 GII areas. South Africa s innovation profile Strengths Most of the comparative GII strengths for South Africa are found on the innovation input side of the GII. The area Market Sophistication (23rd) the top-ranked GII area for South Africa is highlighted as a strength. Here the country also shows strong performance in one of its three components Investment (16th) and in two of its three indicators, Ease of protecting minority investors (24th) and Market capitalization where it positions 1st globally. Other GII strengths are in Domestic credit to private sector (10th) and Domestic market scale (29th). In Business Sophistication (47th), South Africa exhibits strength in indicators Universityindustry research collaboration (28th), State of cluster development (28th), and Intellectual property payments (12th). Strengths on the Innovation Input side are also marked in Institutions (53rd) in the indicator Cost of redundancy dismissal (26th) and in Human Capital & Research (64th) in indicator Expenditure on education (24th). In addition, the indicator Logistics performance (20th) is signaled as strength in Infrastructure (84th). On the innovation output side, South Africa shows only one strength in indicator New business density (12th) within the area Knowledge & Technology Outputs (55th).

Weaknesses Most of the weaknesses for South Africa are found in the innovation input side of the GII. GII weaknesses are mostly exhibited in Infrastructure (84th), where one of its component, Ecological sustainability (116th), is marked as a relative weakness. At the indicator level, Gross capital formation (98th), GDP per unit of energy use (107th), and Environmental performance (108th) are also signaled as GII weaknesses. Two relative weaknesses appear in Human Capital & Research (64th) in indicators Pupilteacher ratio (99th) and Tertiary enrolment (89th). In Institutions (53rd), a single GII weakness lies in indicator Ease of starting a business (101st). In Market Sophistication (23rd), only one indicator Microfinance gross loans (71st) is a relative weakness for South Africa. In Business Sophistication (47th), FDI inflows (106th) is a relatively weak indicator for South Africa. On the innovation output side, South Africa performs relatively weakly in two indicators: ICT services exports (96th) in Knowledge & Technology Outputs (55th) and National feature films (89th) in Creative Outputs (76th). The following figure presents a summary of South Africa s ranks in the 7 GII areas, as well as the overall rank in the GII 2018. South Africa s rank in the GII 2018 and the 7 GII areas Rank 1 is the highest possible in each pillar Total number of countries: 126

Expected vs. Observed Innovation Performance The GII bubble chart shows the relationship between income levels (GDP per capita) and innovation performance (GII score). The depicted trendline gives an indication of the expected innovation performance at different levels of income. Countries located above the trendline are performing better that what would be expected based on their income level. Countries below the line are Innovation Under-performers relative to GDP. Relative to GDP, South Africa performs above its expected level of development.

Missing and Outdated Data More and better data improves the ability of a country to understand its strengths and weaknesses and give policymakers greater capacity to plan and adapt public policies accordingly. The GII 2018 covers 126 countries that complied with the minimum indicator coverage of 35 indicators in the Innovation Input Sub-Index (66%) and 18 indicators in the Innovation Output Sub-Index (66%). The following tables show data for South Africa that is not available or that is outdated. Missing Data Code Indicator Country Year Model Year Source 2.1.4 PISA scales in reading, maths & science n/a 2015 OECD PISA 6.1.3 Utility models by origin/bn PPP$ GDP n/a 2016 WIPO, Intellectual Property Statistics 7.2.4 Printing & other media, % manufacturing n/a 2015 UNIDO, Industrial Statistics Outdated Data Code Indicator Country Model Year Year Source 2.1.2 Government funding/pupil, secondary, % GDP/cap 2012 2014 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 2.1.3 School life expectancy, years 2014 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 2.1.5 Pupil-teacher ratio, secondary 2015 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 2.2.1 Tertiary enrolment, % gross 2014 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 2.2.2 Graduates in science & engineering, % 2015 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 2.2.3 Tertiary inbound mobility, % 2015 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 2.3.1 Researchers, FTE/mn pop. 2015 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 2.3.2 Gross expenditure on R&D, % GDP 2015 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 4.1.3 Microfinance gross loans, % GDP 2015 2016 Microfinance Information Exchange, Mix Market 5.1.2 Firms offering formal training, % firms 2007 2013 World Bank, Enterprise Surveys 5.1.3 GERD performed by business, % GDP 2015 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 5.3.5 Research talent, % in business enterprise 2015 2016 UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) 6.2.5 High- & medium-high-tech manufactures, % 2010 2015 UNIDO, Industrial Statistics 7.3.3 Wikipedia edits/mn pop. 15 69 2016 2017 Wikimedia Foundation

SOUTH AFRICA GII 2018 rank 58 Output rank Input rank Income Region Efficiency ratio Population (mn) GDP, PPP$ GDP per capita, PPP$ GII 2017 rank 65 48 Upper-middle SSF 83 56.7 757.3 13,544.6 57 Score/Value Rank Score/Value Rank Institutions... 65.6 53 Business sophistication...34.4 47 1.1 Political environment... 55.1 56 1.1.1 Political stability & safety*...61.6 71 1.1.2 Government effectiveness*...51.9 53 1.2 Regulatory environment... 72.8 42 1.2.1 Regulatory quality*... 49.5 59 1.2.2 Rule of law*...45.9 55 1.2.3 Cost of redundancy dismissal, salary weeks...9.3 26 1.3 Business environment...68.8 63 1.3.1 Ease of starting a business*...80.0 101 1.3.2 Ease of resolving insolvency*...57.6 51 Human capital & research...30.5 64 2.1 Education...42.2 83 2.1.1 Expenditure on education, % GDP... 5.9 24 2.1.2 Government funding/pupil, secondary, % GDP/cap..21.0 50 2.1.3 School life expectancy, years... 13.4 72 2.1.4 PISA scales in reading, maths & science...n/a n/a 2.1.5 Pupil-teacher ratio, secondary...27.8 99 2.2 Tertiary education...23.1 87 2.2.1 Tertiary enrolment, % gross... 19.8 89 2.2.2 Graduates in science & engineering, %... 19.6 64 2.2.3 Tertiary inbound mobility, %... 4.1 49 2.3 Research & development (R&D)...26.2 38 2.3.1 Researchers, FTE/mn pop.... 473.1 67 2.3.2 Gross expenditure on R&D, % GDP...0.8 42 2.3.3 Global R&D companies, top 3, mn US$... 42.3 34 2.3.4 QS university ranking, average score top 3*... 38.3 33 Infrastructure...39.4 84 3.1 Information & communication technologies (ICTs)... 51.4 81 3.1.1 ICT access*...54.8 76 3.1.2 ICT use*...39.1 80 3.1.3 Government s online service*...55.8 75 3.1.4 E-participation*...55.9 74 3.2 General infrastructure...42.1 48 3.2.1 Electricity output, kwh/cap...4,485.3 47 3.2.2 Logistics performance*... 79.2 20 3.2.3 Gross capital formation, % GDP...19.1 98 3.3 Ecological sustainability...24.6 116 3.3.1 GDP/unit of energy use... 4.7 107 3.3.2 Environmental performance*...44.7 108 3.3.3 ISO 14001 environmental certificates/bn PPP$ GDP...1.8 51 Market sophistication... 57.0 23 4.1 Credit...40.9 50 4.1.1 Ease of getting credit*...60.0 61 4.1.2 Domestic credit to private sector, % GDP...144.4 10 4.1.3 Microfinance gross loans, % GDP... 0.0 71 4.2 Investment...60.9 16 4.2.1 Ease of protecting minority investors*...70.0 24 4.2.2 Market capitalization, % GDP...273.2 1 4.2.3 Venture capital deals/bn PPP$ GDP... 0.0 53 4.3 Trade, competition, & market scale...69.2 35 4.3.1 Applied tariff rate, weighted mean, %...4.2 78 4.3.2 Intensity of local competition...72.7 41 4.3.3 Domestic market scale, bn PPP$...757.3 29 5.1 Knowledge workers...35.9 62 5.1.1 Knowledge-intensive employment, %...23.6 64 5.1.2 Firms offering formal training, % firms...36.8 37 5.1.3 GERD performed by business, % GDP...0.3 43 5.1.4 GERD financed by business, %...38.9 43 5.1.5 Females employed w/advanced degrees, %... 9.7 62 5.2 Innovation linkages...35.0 46 5.2.1 University/industry research collaboration...56.3 28 5.2.2 State of cluster development...58.3 28 5.2.3 GERD financed by abroad, %...13.0 35 5.2.4 JV strategic alliance deals/bn PPP$ GDP...0.1 34 5.2.5 Patent families 2+ offices/bn PPP$ GDP...0.3 37 5.3 Knowledge absorption...32.2 53 5.3.1 Intellectual property payments, % total trade...2.3 12 5.3.2 High-tech net imports, % total trade...10.9 31 5.3.3 ICT services imports, % total trade...1.2 60 5.3.4 FDI net inflows, % GDP...1.0 106 5.3.5 Research talent, % in business enterprise...17.7 58 Knowledge & technology outputs...25.2 55 6.1 Knowledge creation...16.7 54 6.1.1 Patents by origin/bn PPP$ GDP...1.0 64 6.1.2 PCT patents by origin/bn PPP$ GDP...0.4 37 6.1.3 Utility models by origin/bn PPP$ GDP...n/a n/a 6.1.4 Scientific & technical articles/bn PPP$ GDP...10.9 46 6.1.5 Citable documents H index... 27.7 33 6.2 Knowledge impact...40.1 47 6.2.1 Growth rate of PPP$ GDP/worker, %... 0.0 78 6.2.2 New businesses/th pop. 15 64...10.2 12 6.2.3 Computer software spending, % GDP...0.3 37 6.2.4 ISO 9001 quality certificates/bn PPP$ GDP...6.4 51 6.2.5 High- & medium-high-tech manufactures, %...0.3 40 6.3 Knowledge diffusion...18.9 68 6.3.1 Intellectual property receipts, % total trade...0.1 51 6.3.2 High-tech net exports, % total trade... 2.5 49 6.3.3 ICT services exports, % total trade...0.6 96 6.3.4 FDI net outflows, % GDP... 1.7 39 Creative outputs...24.6 76 7.1 Intangible assets...38.5 76 7.1.1 Trademarks by origin/bn PPP$ GDP...30.8 73 7.1.2 Industrial designs by origin/bn PPP$ GDP...1.5 59 7.1.3 ICTs & business model creation...60.5 61 7.1.4 ICTs & organizational model creation...56.9 51 7.2 Creative goods & services... 13.2 84 7.2.1 Cultural & creative services exports, % total trade...0.2 44 7.2.2 National feature films/mn pop. 15 69...0.6 89 7.2.3 Entertainment & Media market/th pop. 15 69... 7.8 38 7.2.4 Printing & other media, % manufacturing...n/a n/a 7.2.5 Creative goods exports, % total trade...0.9 47 7.3 Online creativity... 8.0 59 7.3.1 Generic top-level domains (TLDs)/th pop. 15 69... 3.1 62 7.3.2 Country-code TLDs/th pop. 15 69...8.5 40 7.3.3 Wikipedia edits/mn pop. 15 69...4.2 87 7.3.4 Mobile app creation/bn PPP$ GDP...17.6 47 NOTES: indicates a strength; a weakness; an income group strength; an income group weakness; * an index; a survey question. indicates that the country s data are older than the base year; see Appendix II for details, including the year of the data, at http://globalinnovationindex.org. Square brackets indicate that the data minimum coverage (DMC) requirements were not met at the sub-pillar or pillar level; see page 75 of this appendix for details. Country/Economy Profiles 181