MORE EFFICIENT MECHANISMS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL

Similar documents
Re Thinking Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

More Affordable, Reliable and Recoverable Nutrient Removal

Enhanced biological phosphorus removal

An Attempt to Sustainably Stabilize EBPR Performance at Meriden, CT with Side-Stream EBPR

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

GRANULAR ACTIVATED SLUDGE

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

ADVANCING NOVEL PROCESSES FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Biological Phosphorus Removal

Seeking the Optimum Approach to Generate VFA/rbCOD to Ensure Reliable EBPR at the Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility

Secondary Treatment Process Control

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

Fundamental and practical studies on Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Daniel R. Noguera

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PLUS CHEMICAL POLISHING FOR LOW LEVEL COMPLIANCE

ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHIN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS. 255 Consumers Road Toronto, ON, Canada, M2J 5B6

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

OPTIMIZING THE OPERATION OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES GRANT WEAVER, PE & WASTEWATER OPERATOR WEBINAR MARCH 18, 2014

Future Directions In Wastewater Treatment

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

THE SEQUENCED AERATION PROCESS MONTAGUE, MASSACHUSETTS

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Biological Phosphorous Removal Is Coming! Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference, June 23, 2008; Boyne Falls MI

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

James Winslade Instructor, Environmental Resources Training Center Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PROVEN METHODS FOR UPGRADING YOUR FACILITIES

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

2.0 Nutrient Removal Alternatives

Effective Use of Carbon in Nutrient Removal Systems

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Simultaneous Nutrient Removal: Quantification, Design, and Operation. Leon Downing, Ph.D., PE Donohue & Associates

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

The following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Ohio Water Environment Association Present and Future Technologies for Nutrient Removal

Environmental Biotechnology Cooperative Research Centre Date submitted: March 2008 Date published: March 2011

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Increasing Biological Phosphorus Removal: Texas Case Study

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Microbial Population Database for Evaluating Biological Nutrient Removal Process in Kwa- Zulu Natal

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Presentation Outline

SECTION 14.0 BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Chemical and Biological Phosphorus Removal at One of the World s Largest Water Resource Recovery Facilities

Evaluation of Preformance for a Novel Side Stream Enhanced Biological Phopshporus Removal Configuration at a Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment Plant

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

CRUDE COD CHARACTERISTICS SIGNIFICANT FOR BIOLOGICAL P REMOVAL: A U.K. EXAMPLE

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

2015 Spring Conference

Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN OXIDATION DITCH PLANTS

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

Upgrade of an Oxidation Ditch Using Bio-Mass Carriers

Full Scale Testing to Demonstrate Anaerobic Selector Effect for Low Strength Wastewater

ASA Analytics ChemScan Process Analyzers Reprint ASA Publication #194

TROUBLESHOOTING BNR PROCESSES E. Stone, S. Walker, R. Reardon Carollo Engineers, Inc.

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

WELCOME TO THE NOVEMBER EDITION OF THE 2016 M&R SEMINAR SERIES

EFFECT OF FERROUS SULPHATE ON THE SIMULTANEOUS ORGANIC MATTER AND NUTRIENT REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Innovations in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

Implementation and Results of a Feed-Forward Process Controller

A Review of the Current State of Knowledge on Phosphorus Removal

CITY OF WILSON WRF ACHIEVEMENTS IN TOTAL NITROGEN AND PHOSHPORUS REDUCTION BELOW ENR LEVELS

City of Loveland Nutrient Removal Evaluation Final Report

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

A Critical New Look at Nutrient Removal Processes

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

Septicity. Midwest Contract Operations. Presented by: Ryan Hennessy. (Organic Acids/ Sulfide)

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Bathurst Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works, New South Wales, Australia.

NEWEA 2015 Annual Conference Session 16

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Innovative Phosphorus Control to Turn Struvite Headaches into Increase Revenue. Peter Schauer, Rob Baur, Brett Laney PNCWA 2010

Use of Activate Sludge Model No. 3 and Bio-P module for simulating five-stage step-feed enhanced biological phosphorous removal process

MIXED LIQUOR FERMENTATION FOR CARBON AUGMENTATION BREAKING FREE FROM AN UNFAVORABLE INFLUENT CARBON BALANCE

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Making Your Plant Denitrify

Table A1 - Peak Factors Used In Preparation Of Synthetic Database...1. Table A2 - Hourly Factors Used In Preparation Of Synthetic Database...

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Biological Nutrient Removal Processes

Transcription:

NEWEA ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION MORE EFFICIENT MECHANISMS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL JAMES BARNARD, MARK STEICHEN & PATRICK DUNLAP January 22-25 Boston MA

AGENDA History of EBPR Proposed mechanisms Alternative flowsheets Possible limitations of existing practices Problems with modeling alternative flow sheets Proposed remedies

2 SOME EARLY OBSERVATIONS Hi-rate no nitrification 30 to 40 h in Stripper Supernatant high in P treated with lime All primary effluent to aeration basin RAS thru deep anaerobic conditions Influent Wastewater Return Biomass Aerated P-enriched Lime Sludge Phostrip Process Levin et al (1975) Lime Settling Stripper Effluent Wasted Biomass 3

MIXED LIQUOR FERMENTER (MLF) Fermenter resulted from basin configuration and not deemed important Excellent phosphorus removal resulted Note orthophosphates profile through plant Performance could not be replicated in laboratory Barnard suggested organisms (PAO) should pass through anaerobic phase with low ORP which triggered EBPR Suggested Phoredox process by adding anaerobic zone up front Barnard 100 m 3 /d pilot 1972

PHOREDOX (AKA AO) CONCEPT OF PASSING ALL PRIMARY EFFLUENT THROUGH ANAEROBIC ZONE

2 FUHS & CHEN (1975) Studied the Pho-strip process Suggested PAO take up P when aerobic, use that energy to take up VFA in anaerobic zone Identified PAO as Acinetobacter Mechanisms further developed by Comeau & Wentzel As adapted by Comeau & Wentzel Problem not always sufficient VFA in primary effluent 6

VFA FROM FERMENTERS

VIEW OF KELOWNA B.C. Fermenter Anaerobic Zones PST

2 FURTHER STUDIES IDENTIFIED CANDIDATUS ACCUMULIBACTER AS THE DOMINANT PAO it was incorrectly considered that PAOs were of the genus Acinetobacter. or Tetrasphaera by Fuhs & Chen and others* More recently, culture-independent methods have shown Accummulibacter phosphatis is a PAO which can be grown in enriched cultures * For the purpose of design it will be considered that anoxic P uptake is not significant * *IWA Biological Wastewater Treatment - Principles,, Modeling and Design Henze et al 9

WESTBANK WITH FERMENTER Westside Kelowna BC (Westbank) X TN < 6 mg/l BOD < 5 mg/l TSS < 2 mg/l TP < 0.15 mg/l

WESTBANK WWTP Primary Anaerob Anoxic 1 Anoxic 2 Anoxic 3 Aerobic 1 Aerobic 2 Aerobic 3 5.36 10.00 20.56 2.20 1.84 1.60 0.50 0.20 0.03 Phosphorus mg/l 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Tetrasphaera can denitrify Bioreactor Profile Phosphorus by Zone Primary Anaerob Anoxic 1 Anoxic 2 Anoxic 3 Aerobic 1 Aerobic 2 Aerobic 3 Note P uptake in Anoxic Zone

MIX OF ORGANISMS IN WESTSIDE PLANT Dunlap et al 2015 FISH Image from WR WWTP Sludge with EUB mix (all bacteria) Shown in Green, Tet2-174 (Tetrasphaera clade 2B) in Orange, and Tet3-654 (Tetrasphaera clade 3) in Red.

0.3 PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH SIDE- STREAM FERMENTATION Iowa Hill CO plant From Chris Maher 9/8/2011 9/9/2011 9/10/2011 0.25 Effluent Ortho P mg/l 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0

EXPERIMENT AT DENVER METRO RAS Cavanaugh, L., Carson, K., Lynch, C., Phillips, H., Barnard, J. and McQuarrie, J. (2012) A Small Footprint Approach for Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal: Results from a 106 mgd Full-Scale Demonstration. Proceedings of the 85 th Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition and Conference, New Orleans, LA, October 2012.

PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL BY RAS FERMENTATION DENVER METRO 3.0 25 NSEC Effluent TP 2.5 20 2.0 NSEC Effluent TSS 15 mg-p/l 1.5 1.0 10 mg-tss/l 0.5 5 0.0 NSEC Effluent PO4-P 10/4/2011 10/6/2011 10/8/2011 10/10/2011 10/12/2011 10/14/2011 10/16/2011 10/18/2011 10/20/2011 10/22/2011 10/24/2011 10/26/2011 10/28/2011 10/30/2011 11/1/2011 11/3/2011 11/5/2011 11/7/2011 11/9/2011 11/11/2011 11/13/2011 11/15/2011 11/17/2011 11/19/2011 11/21/2011 11/23/2011 11/25/2011 11/27/2011 11/29/2011 12/1/2011 12/3/2011 12/5/2011 0 Cavanaugh, L., Carson, K., Lynch, C., Phillips, H., Barnard, J. and McQuarrie, J. (2012) A Small Footprint Approach for Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal: Results from a 106 mgd Full-Scale Demonstration. Proceedings of the 85 th Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition and Conference, New Orleans, LA, October 2012.

CAROUSEL PLANT HENDERSON NV 60 ML/D UPGRADED TO BNR Switching off a mixer in the anaerobic zone resulted in In-plant Fermentation Ortho-P for May 2010 0.5 ANA Eft SPS SCC Final Eft 0.4 Phosphorus (mg/l) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 5/3/2010 5/4/2010 5/5/2010 5/6/2010 5/7/2010 5/8/2010 5/9/2010 5/10/2010 5/11/2010 5/12/2010 5/13/2010 5/14/2010 5/15/2010 5/16/2010 5/17/2010 5/18/2010 5/19/2010 5/20/2010 5/21/2010 5/22/2010 5/23/2010 5/24/2010 5/25/2010 5/26/2010 5/27/2010 5/28/2010 5/29/2010 5/1/2010 5/2/2010 5/30/2010

POSSIBLE LIMITATIONS OF EXISTING CONFIGURATION Were we perhaps selecting mostly for species of Accumulibacter that needed a supply of acetic & propionic acid They could have prevailed in standard anaerobic zones since conditions were not ideal for fermenting species like Tetrasphaera Tetrasphaera can ferment glucose and amino acids and other higher carbon forms and store phosphorus Nguyen et al They actually produce VFA that allow a population of Accumulibacter to grow alongside them They can denitrify under anoxic conditions Why did we not grow them not deep enough anaerobic conditions 2 17

WHY DID WE MISS IT? It appears that we need an ORP of <-300 mv most anaerobic zones struggle to get -150 mv Impossible to achieve with nitrates or DO anywhere Most plants were over-mixed with turbulent surfaces that entrained air which prevented deeper anaerobic conditions Standard mixing energy 0.6 hp/kcf need 0.08 hp/kcf (huge saving in energy) Too much air entrained in primary effluent Too much primary effluent per se which may contain very little VFA thus diluting the content of the anaerobic zone and reducing the anaerobic SRT 18

ORP IN ANAEROBIC ZONES Anaerobic Zone Conventional Anaerobic Zone Side-stream Fermenter 0 VFA -100 Accummulibacter Accummulibacter ORP (mv ) -200 Tetrasphaera VFA Glucose -300 19

2 MODIFIED WESTBANK PROCESS Aim for 1 to 2 day SRT in anaerobic zone (12-18 h with fermentate 20

WHEN NO PRIMARIES USE MIXED LIQUOR FERMENTER OLATHE KS, SACRAMENTO CA 5.0 4.5 4.0 Flow Split Fermentation Power Outage End of MLF 5.0 4.5 4.0 Ortho-Phosphate, mg-p/l 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 COD: TKN 7.2 Nitrates 7.5 Average SVI ~ 90 ml/g Hardly any Acetate addition Present Limit 2.3 mg/l 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 12/2/13 1/1/14 1/31/14 3/2/14 4/1/14 5/1/14 5/31/14 6/30/14 7/30/14 Time MLF mixed only once per day or less often Guideline SRT of MLF approximately 2 days And here I would like to thank Kevin Clark from Pinery Water for showing us the way 21

Black & Veatch LAY-OUT OF CHANGIPLANT - SINGAPORE Aerobic Aerobic Aerobic Aerobic Aerobic RAS Feed Step-feed nitrification/denitrification Achieve EBPR Denite PAO Presence of Accumulibacter & Tetrasphaera The Occurrence of Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal in a 200,000 m3/day Partial Nitration and Anammox Activated Sludge Process at the Changi Water Reclamation Plant, Singapore Cao et al, 2016 22

2 23

TETRASPHAERA IMPACTS MODEL BEHAVIOR Anaerobic Process Aerobic Processes Fermentation With Tetrasphaera OHOs Only Sb Tetrasphaera Ordinary Heterotroph Poly-P Growth COD Acetate COD Typical PAO Poly-P PO 4 PO 4 Tetrasphaera Ordinary Heterotroph Growth PO 4 Poly-P Sb COD O 2 COD Poly-P Growth Typical PAO PO 4

DRAWBACKS OF PARAMETER ADJUSTMENT Coarse parameter adjustment can offer insight into current model shortcomings but; the adjustment of many variables likely results in over adjustment & compensation, calibration is only possible if all relevant mechanisms are incorporated, and it will provide little predictive power when extrapolating beyond specific scenario. We are working with Northeastern University towards recommendations for better modeling sidestream EBPR as part WERF study Refer to WWTmod 2016 paper for more information; Rethinking EBPR: What do you do when the model will not fit real-world evidence?

2 CONCLUSIONS Shortcomings of design resulted in selection for limited variety of PAO, mainly those that need a supply of SCVFA Deeper anaerobic conditions are needed to cultivate fermenting PAO such as Tetrasphaera These organisms can also take up phosphorus under anoxic conditions Limit HRT in anaerobic zone by reduced primary effluent discharge and/or reduced RAS flow Wastewater characteristics irrelevant Modeling for alternative species of fermenting PAOs 26

2 27

2 28

www.bv.com