Sweet Creek Road Retaining Wall Replacement. Mapleton, OR

Similar documents
ARGENTINE CONNECTION BRIDGE TRIPLE TRACK CROSSING. Kansas City Terminal Railway Company

MOA Project # Golden View Drive Intersection & Safety Upgrades

Tilikum Crossing Transit Bridge. Portland, OR

Sandy High School. Sandy, OR

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF DERRY ROAD AND CANADIAN NATIONAL RAIL GRADE SEPARATION

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

OR99E: Clackamas River Bridge Dunes Drive. Oregon City, OR

Bonner Bridge Replacement Update:

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Safe, innovative, quality construction since Riding on the Strength

Final Estimates Level 2

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Abo Canyon Second Main Track

Traffic Management Guide to Concrete Overlay Solutions. Dale S. Harrington P.E. Representing CP Tech Center

TABULATION OF TOTAL QUANTITIES - CR 44H (BUCKHORN ROAD) (1 OF 2)

Well Road Project Accelerated Bridge Construction Using Self-Propelled Modular Transporters (SPMT s) By: Mark Bucci, P.E.

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION OF 1990

ODOT Design & Construction Requirements for MSE Walls

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED THROUGH 1:00 PM ON MAY 24, 2018:

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Case Histories. Cap and Compaction Grouting for Sinkhole Remediation R.M. Bivens, P.E. Rembco Geotechnical Contractors, Inc.

Platform District at Orenco. Hillsboro, OR

SOUTH MEDFORD INTERCHANGE BRIDGES

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

10:00 AM, Wednesday, May 6, Peters Creek Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project

ENTRY FORM. DVASE 2014 Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program

VT 14 East Montpelier Bridge Project Informational Meeting. February 22, 2017

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

A. Section includes temporary excavation support and protection systems.

Excavate drilled shafts in accordance with Item 416, Drilled Shaft Foundations.

JANUARY 4, 2017 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN. (Estimated Cost: $4,600,000) Bids J D WILLIAMSON CONSTRUCTION CO INC $3,799,476.25

6 th STREET VIADUCT SIESMIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Ingenuity Offers a Solution to an Anomaly in a Bridge Support

STRUCTURES INSPECTION CERTIFICATION TRAINING COURSE

ESTABLISHING A SOLID FOUNDATION FOR NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE OVER THE SOUTH CANADIAN RIVER NEAR PURCELL, OKLAHOMA

The Chief Estimator Software. Item Cost Summary Bridge & Overpass Projects

Kicking Horse Cantilever Structure. Bruce Hamersley, P.Eng., Klohn Crippen Berger Ltd. Keith Mitchell, P.Eng., Klohn Crippen Berger Ltd.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR PIPE JACKING (PJ) October, 2006

SR 0136-G10 ABC BRIDGE REPLACEMENT in Eighty Four, PA

SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR HORIZONTAL AUGER BORING (HAB) October, 2006

This drawing. is preliminary. and not for. construction or. implementation. purposes. project number 170 END VIEW DESIGN STRENGTHS: PLAN

Ohio Department of Transportation Central Office 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, OH John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director

Economical Design / Case Studies

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Clear Creek Road (PM 1.82 & 0.25) Bridge Replacement Projects. Public Meeting, Wednesday, November 20, 2013 Pleasant Valley Middle School

Foundation Innovations Ensure Successful Bridge Replacement


twenty six concrete construction: foundation design ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2013

Lecture 13: Practical Design, The Future of Prestressed Concrete, and Concluding Thoughts...

STANDARDIZED CONCRETE BRIDGES IN TEXAS. John Holt, PE, Texas Department of Transportation Ronald Medlock, PE, Texas Department of Transportation

204 - EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR STRUCTURES SECTION 204 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR STRUCTURES. Granular Backfill (Wingwalls) (Set Price)

PHASING CONSIDERATIONS FOR BRIDGES

Traffic Technical Memorandum: Hickman Road over Tuolumne River Bridge Replacement Project, Stanislaus County (BRLO-5938(199))

Stevens & Associates, Inc. Tunnel Construction Projects. Fact Sheets

SECTION 39 - MANHOLES TABLE OF CONTENTS 39-1 GENERAL PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLES

HALLS RIVER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

DSNY/DDC Spring Street Salt Shed

Take Me to the Other Side:

CHEF MENTEUR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement California Practices

SECTION 39 - MANHOLES TABLE OF CONTENTS

WELCOME TO THE PILE DRIVING INSPECTOR COURSE

twenty seven concrete construction: foundation design Foundation Structural vs. Foundation Design Structural vs. Foundation Design

West Virginia s First ABC Deck Replacement Project Bill Manuel & Johann Aakre HNTB Corporation

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Presented by: Taya Retterer BRG Webinar July 30, 2012

Misan University - College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department

Halls River Bridge Update

COVER FEATURE. Micropile. Design Minimizes. California Edison Project

9 Concrete Pavement Patching

Lesner Bridge Replacement

Upon speaking with the representatives with Technical Foundations as well as Walder Foundations, it was determined that:

Lessons Learned Meeting Notes

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

twenty four foundations and retaining walls Foundation Structural vs. Foundation Design Structural vs. Foundation Design

Deep Foundations Institute Fall 2004 Fall 2004

Flood Hazard Assessment Report Falls Gulch, Larimer County, Colorado January 16, 2013

Proposal. Revised The Residences Anne Arundel County, Maryland. 1/14/2011 Faculty Advisor - Dr. Richard A. Behr Ryan English - Structural Option

Converting square ft to cubic yards concrete

Using Load Testing to Save Money and Time on the I-35W Bridge Project

HANt>LtNC WORK AND MtN 171

Technical Report #2. Matthew R Peyton

Specification Changes and Their Effect on Plans. Bridge Construction Issues. BRG VTC April, 2010

SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR MICROTUNNELING (MT) October, 2006

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

JOB BB0113 SHELL LAKE STR. & APPRS. (S) MARCH 10, 2015 LETTING QUESTIONS PREVIOUSLY ASKED UNDER JOB BB0106.

CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ADDENDUM NUMBER 1, APRIL 25, 2018 FOR THE CITY OF BRECKSVILLE,

DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK 2006 Edition, Published January 1, 2006; Division Revision Date: January 31, 2012

St. Anthony Falls I-35W Bridge Replacement. ASHE National Conference June 13, Dustin Thomas, P.E. I-35W Bridge Construction Engineer

ITEM QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE AMOUNT. Contractor Construction Staking 1.0 Lump Sum

Performance of Ultra-Thin Whitetopping District 58. Neal West, P.E.

Performance Verification Packet. Supervisor

US-131 Over the Muskegon River. Corey Rogers, P.E. Bridge Construction Engineer

City of Mesquite General Design Standards Revision Date:

John James Audubon Bridge. Introduction

Norfolk Southern s Online Rebuild of the Coosa River Bridge

Transcription:

Sweet Creek Road Retaining Wall Replacement Mapleton, OR

Technical Information Project Completion Date: April 30, 2013 Project Location: Mapleton, OR Size of Project: 15,000 SF, 870 CY Concrete Strength Requirements: (cu. yds., sq. ft., etc.) : The 15 span, 1130 foot bridge, was constructed using 105, four-foot wide by 30 inch thick precast, pre-stressed concrete slabs, varying in length from 50 to 81 feet and totaling 7,902 linear feet. Each span is made up of 7 slabs. The slabs rest on a total of 16 reinforced concrete caps ranging from 3 to 4 foot wide by 4 foot deep. 240 yards of concrete was used for bridge cap construction. Each cap sets on four concrete-filled steel pipe piles drilled 15 feet into bedrock. A total of 64 steel pipe piles support the length of the structure. The 64 pipe piles are encased in a total of 121 yards of concrete. Water/Cement Ratios: : Reinforced Bridge Caps and End Panels: 0.45 (Standard) / 0.35 (Early Strength); Concrete in Bridge Pipe

Unique or High Volume Admixtures: Four primary concrete mix designs were used on the project. Admixtures were needed to slow the set time of the concrete for transportation and also to keep the concrete fluid like for placement by pump operation. 1. Drilled Shaft Concrete 2. Exterior Structural Concrete 3. Exterior Structural Concrete 4. Type F Bridge Rail - Slip Form Total LEED points attributed to concrete construction: This project is credited with two LEED points for the respective sections: Water Quantity (6.1) and Water Quality (6.2). Describe unique mix designs: The most unique concrete mix design used on this project was the 5,000 psi Structural High-Early mix used in bent cap construction. Describe placement challenges or unique techniques: Given the immediate proximity of the Siuslaw River, the narrow roadbed and work area, the adjacent steep rock bluffs, and the needs of motorists, this project presented numerous placement challenges which inevitably drove a completely new design.

Sweet Creek Road is located near the community of Mapleton, Oregon, approximately 15 miles east of the Pacific Ocean, and is a vital transportation link between State Route 126 and large tracts of public and private forest lands. The road provides the only all-season access route to 68 rural residences. Particular sections of the roadway had been constant maintenance challenges due to settling pavement, sunken grades and failing retaining walls. Maintenance issues were compounded by a 22 foot wide roadway, bordered by a sheer rock bluff and steep banks of the Siuslaw River. In January 2011, one lane of the roadway sunk severely, resulting in a huge crack, leaving the westbound lane impassable.

The Sweet Creek Road Retaining Wall Replacement Project was designed to replace the failing retaining walls as viewed from the adjacent Siuslaw River and rebuild both lanes of the roadway by constructing two tieback retaining walls totaling 900 feet, connected by a 240 foot long pre-stressed bridge.

The contractor could only work during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, allowing traffic to pass through the work zone every hour for a period of five minutes. Full road closures were permitted during the hours of 8:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. as on-site discoveries forced a completely different design and construction approach.

Prior to beginning construction, the contractor presented Lane County with a Value Engineering Plan (VEP) which proposed replacing the deepest sections of the retaining wall with additional bridge spans. The contractor had difficulty designing a shoring plan that would allow deep excavations for double tieback retaining wall construction while maintaining traffic flow on half of the existing roadway.

The VEP served as the foundation for extensive design changes. It eliminated all double tieback sections of the wall and it changed the project from a single, 240-foot, three-span bridge with two tieback retaining walls into two bridges having a total of 11 spans connected by a 180-foot tieback retaining wall.

As soldier piles were being drilled and installed for the remaining retaining walls, a second issue presented itself. In some locations bedrock was being encountered at depths greater than those estimated on the plans. These soldier piles were so deep they would require a double tieback.

It was further discovered during the initial drilling for the retaining wall soldier piles, that the rock encountered, which was thought to be bedrock, was actually large boulders. As a result, some soldier piles were installed with inadequate embedment into bedrock.

The project team eliminated all but 40 feet of retaining wall and added additional spans which tied the two concrete bridge structures into a single bridge. The result was the construction of one, continuous 15-span concrete bridge structure totaling 1,130 feet.

The construction limitations initially imposed by the river, the rock bluff and the narrow and heavily utilized roadway were compounded by differing soil and bedrock conditions discovered during construction.

This project was unique in that it began its life primarily as a retaining wall replacement project, but quickly morphed into a bridge construction project. In spite of these dramatic changes, the project team through a close partnership was able to retain the project s original scope, schedule and budget.