Baltimore City Department of Public Works

Similar documents
CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Sewer Facilities 102. Hampstead Sewer Service Area. Carroll County Water & Sewer Master Plan. Current Conditions

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Assuming 100 gallons per capita per day, and 3 people per REU, design flows for the development are proposed to be:

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

Town of Robbinsville Constructs Cheoah River BNR Wastewater Treatment Facility to Meet New Nitrogen and Phosphorus Permit Limits

SMCSD Headworks, Primary and Secondary Treatment Pre-Design

COG Region s Potomac Water Quality & Wastewater Treatment Fact Sheet (current draft, as of 7/28/09)

Public Information Meeting Wastewater Master Plan

Borough of Chambersburg Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Upgrade Project

TAMING TIGERS AND WRESTLING ANACONDAS: PENDER COUNTY COMMERCE PARK WWTP

Synergy: Addressing Combined Sewer Overflows and Nitrogen

Page 1 For More Information Call (801)

North Side WRP Master Plan Research and Development Department 2006 Seminar Series October 27, 2006 Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

Addendum I to Request for Qualifications for Large Capital Projects Engineering Services

VILLAGE OF ALGONQUIN 2014 WASTEWATER FACILITY PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

CHAPTER 4 WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS WASTEWATER FLOWS

HIGH RATE TREATMENT AS PART OF THE SOLUTION FOR WET WEATHER FLOWS JUNE

Filtrate Treatment Facility Update

Presenters: Rodrigo Pena-Lang, PE (D&B Engineers), Magdalena Gasior, PE (D&B Engineers) and Paul D. Smith, PE (NYCDEP)

and Drinking Water Issues

Membrane Bioreactor and High Flow Biological Treatment System for the Cox Creek WRF

Council of Governments

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Refinement of Nitrogen Removal from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

NEWEA 2015 Annual Conference Session 16

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. INTRODUCTION B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS. 1. Conveyance System

SeRVice: Wastewater Treatment

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2012

Anderson Water Pollution Control Plant

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL STUDY CLEARFIELD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY FOR CLEARFIELD MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY APRIL 2008

Wet Weather Planning for Wastewater Treatment Plants

Oxidation Ditch Technologies

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

Masses at Massillon: IFAS for Industrial Loads and Nutrient Removal

City of Ames. Water Pollution Control. Long Range Facility Plan

Pamela Reitsma Environmental Scientist Narragansett Bay Commission

East Coast P Removal Technology Performance Summary

Oxidation Ditch Technologies WATER TECHNOLOGIES

An Evaluation of Nitrogen Loading into Upper Narragansett Bay

Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity

Public Information Meeting Wastewater Master Plan Facilities Plan Update June 23, 2010

PROJECT AND REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS (WASTEWATER PROJECTS)

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

DESIGNING LAGOON-BASED WWTP FOR <1 MG/ L AMMONIA (AND TN) IN <34 F WATER. Nick Janous Regional Manager

Comparative Study on Total Suspended Solids and Nutrients of the Las Vegas Wash Between the Demonstration Weir and its Terminus at the Las Vegas Bay

Presentation Outline

Module 1: Introduction to Wastewater Treatment Answer Key

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Dipankar Sen, PhD, PE Santa Clara Valley Water District Professor, Virginia Tech Civil & Env Engr

Upgrade of an Oxidation Ditch Using Bio-Mass Carriers

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

Septic System Impacts on Stormwater and Impaired Waterbodies. December 8, 2016 Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering Marcy Frick, Tetra Tech

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

Controlling CSO Discharges in the City of Toronto: Don River and Central Waterfront Project

2012 Nutrient Regulations Update

The alternatives addressed in this EIR were selected in consideration of one or more of the following factors:

2015 Spring Conference

Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Technical Information

THE ROLE OF MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS IN ADDRESSING CHESAPEAKE BAY CHALLENGES. Introduction. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Challenges

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

UDWQ POTW Nutrient Removal Cost Impact Study: Analysis of Tremonton City Wastewater Treatment Plant

DRAFT SUBMITTED TO: TOWNSHIP OF LONG HILL PREPARED BY: KLEINFELDER

Utilization of Dynamic Modeling to Evaluate and Design Secondary Clarifiers for the Muddy Creek WWTP

Algae Removal from a Facultative Lagoon System Using Dissolved Air Flotation. J. Patrick Pierce, P.E. Environmental Treatment Systems, Inc.

Water Resources Director: Chris Graybeal

CLR Process. Vertical Loop Configuration

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

City of Andover, Kansas Energy Assessment-Wastewater Treatment Plant

SEWPCC Upgrading/Expansion Conceptual Design Report. SECTION 6 - Process Flow Diagram / Mass Balance. Table of Contents

Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems

City of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant. Redlands, CA LOCATION: Carollo Engineers; CH2M HILL MBR MANUFACTURER: COMMENTS:

EPA Waste Water Discharge Licence Application

Determination of Treatment Requirements for Municipal and Private Sewage Treatment Works Discharging to Surface Waters

Chapter 4 TMACOG Areawide Water Quality Management 208 Plan 4-116

Volume 4 Final Facility Plan for the West and East Wastewater Treatment Plants. May 31, 2013

Executive Summary. Introduction

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Wastewater Treatment Works and Collections System Annual Report Year 2005 General Information

Improvements to the Missouri River Wastewater Treatment Plant- Schedule BProject. Public Meeting June 4, 2013 South Omaha Public Library

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant 6.7 Alternative 7: Upgrade Existing Lagoons with New Percolation Bed

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

Clean Water 2020 Program

Sustaining Our Water Resources Public Health. April 27, 2011

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

Bloomingdale WWTF Private/Public Partnership Works. Bob Wilcox, PE Fleis & VandenBrink May 10, 2016

Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update City Project # City of Liberty, Missouri May 6, 2013

Georgia Power Plant Bowen NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised December 2017

Enhanced Nitrogen Removal Using Upflow Biological Filtration

Transcription:

Baltimore City Department of Public Works Back River WWTP Process and Construction Overview Michael F. Gallagher, Chief Wastewater Facilities Division

Wastewater Treatment Chesapeake Bay Restoration Water Quality Improve dissolved oxygen (DO) levels Reduce dead zones Increase submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) Improve marine habitat Factors affecting Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Sediment loading Nutrients Nitrogen and Phosphorus (N and P) loading Wastewater Treatment Plants (point-sources) Reduce levels of N and P through best available technology

Original facilities constructed in 1907; operational 1912 Today the plant occupies 466-acres and serves 1.3 million people. Among the largest wastewater treatment plants in the mid-atlantic region. Physical, chemical and biological treatment processes 24-hour operation. Can process flows over 400 million gallons per day and handle peak flows up to 800 MGD w/flow equalization after head works upgrade.

Current permit through the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to meet stringent effluent limits (monthly averages): BOD5 10 mg/l Total Suspended Solids 10 mg/l Seasonal ammonia-n 2.0 / 5.7 mg/l (summer/winter) Total nitrogen ( BNR ) 8 mg/l (annual average) Total Phosphorus 0.2 mg/l E.coli (disinfection) 126 MPN/ 100 ml

ENR Improvements Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) (in late 1980 s): Reduce total nitrogen (TN) 30 40 mg/l 8 10 mg/l Reduce total phosphorus (TP) 4 6 mg/l 0.2 mg/l Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) (in late 2016): Reduce total nitrogen (TN) 8 10 mg/l 3 mg/l Reduce total phosphorus (TP) 0.2 mg/l 0.3 mg/l

ENR Improvements Back River WWTP receives about 35,000 lbs. of Nitrogen and 6,000 lbs. of Phosphorus every day with the influent Back River WWTP began nutrient (N and P) reduction in the late 1990 s targeting about 70% reduction of the incoming Nitrogen using Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) technology More than 90% of the Phosphorus is already being removed through chemical treatment ENR will remove over 90% of the Total Nitrogen

ENR Improvements

PHASED CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM DURATION Started construction in the fall of 2013 Construction completion by end of 2016 Plant must achieve permit compliance by September 2017

BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY AND BAY Overall cleaner effluent to Back River and the Chesapeake Bay 95% or more of the bio-available nitrogen and phosphorus will be removed this improves the aquatic conditions, with fewer algae blooms and better environment for the fish Baltimore City/County commitment to the State, and the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Program

APPROXIMATE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Back River WWTP Upgrade: Phase I - $275 million Phase II - $300 million Patapsco River WWTP Upgrade: Phase I - $115 million Phase II - $145 million Total costs more than ¾ billion dollars Funded in part by the State (about 70%)

Patapsco Plant Aerial view

Patapsco BAF and De-Nitrification Filter

2008 cogeneration facility constructed to reduce the purchase of electrical power by $1.4 million annually by using the methane gas produced at Back River to generate electricity. 2012 solar array: 4,200 American-made panels, installed at a cost of about $4 million, supply about 5 percent of the energy up to 1,000 kilowatts per hour needed to run the plant.

SC-918 Headwork Improvements Screen and Grit Facility improvements New influent wet weather pumping station Peak flow equalization (36 MG storage) to protect downstream treatment processes

Very flat slope - 0.025% to 0.04 % Hydraulic restriction BRWWTP grit tank weir Two primary influences: Contributes to grit and sediment deposition in the Outfall Sewer(s) Reduces conveyance capacity during wet weather events and increases the potential of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs)

Project Goals and Objectives Provide Influent Pumping Station at the Back River WWTP to: Remove the hydraulic restriction in the Outfall Sewer System Increase hydraulic capacity of the Outfall Sewer System Provide new Head works Facilities with capacity to treat future, model predicted wet weather flows: Coarse Screen Facility Fine Screen Facility Grit Removal Facility Provide Equalization Pumping and Tanks for storage of wet weather flows in excess of the hydraulic and treatment capacities of the headworks facilities and downstream plant processes

10 MW Emergency Generators Influent Pumping Station Equalization Pumping Station 16.5 MG Storage Tank Coarse Screen Facility Fine Screen Facility Grit Removal Facility 3 MG Storage Tank

QUESTIONS?