Organisation Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Bamako, Mali June Date

Transcription

1 Organisation Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Bamako, Mali June Date Reporting period 2015 ActivityImplemented Result by area Rio marker Gender marker Number Name Actual expenditure Name organisation Channel Result area Mitigation/Adaptation Significant/principal2 Significant/principal BAM FIBANI beroepsonderwijs SWISSCONTACT NGO Promote agricultural growth (included livestock and fish) Adaptation Significant Significant BAM_POF Macro et Secteur Privé SOCIETE FRANCK IGUE ET PARTENAIRES (FI&PARTNERS) PPP or network [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

2 Result Area 1 Result question 1a: To what extent have hunger and malnutrition been reduced? Reduce malnutrition At national level no reduction has taken place in this respect. Food insecurity affected nearly two and half million people in Mali for year Malnutrition affects women 15 to 49 years and children under five. Of these, 24% are underweight, 12% acute malnutrition, chronic malnutrition 29%, 47% of anemia are at risk of vitamin A deficiency statistics also indicate that 8 % of women 15 and 49 are thin, 20% are overweight, 68% are anemic. The Mali Enquête Nationale sur la Sécurité Alimentaire et Nutritionnelle (ENSAN) report is based on a national survey of 8,586 households, and MUAC measurement of 15,563 children aged 6-59 months. There is little progress on chronic and severe hunger reduction and malnutrition despite a rise of the national rate for undernourished children. Indicator 1: Prevalence of undernourishment 16.7% ( ) 7.3% <5% <5% <5% FAO, The state of food insecurity in he World 2015 Indicator 2: Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population, based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale 11,50% Système d Alerte Précoce (SAP) Indicator 3: Prevalence of stunting (height for age <-2 standard deviation from the median of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards) among children under 5 years of age Indicator 4: Prevalence of malnutrition (weight for height >+2 or <-2 standard deviation from the median of the WHO Child Growth 20 % (2012) 15% 20% 16.9% 24.2% 29,30% Standards) among children under 5 years of age, by type (wasting and overweight) Indicator 5: Acute malnutrition and chronic malnutrition among children < 5 years (%) 8.9% acute 27.5% chronic (2012) 22% chronic 8.9% acute 27.5% chronic 8.6% acute; 1.9% severe 28.1% chronic 13.3% severe 38,50% 12.4% chronic 2.8% severe health_statistics/2016/whs2016_annexa_ ChildStunting.pdf Rapport campagne agricole 2015/2016 CPS MDR Rapport campagne agricole 2015/2016 CPS MDR Indicator 6: Rate of men, women, girls and boys that have access to less than 2450 kcal per day (20%) (22,04%) CPS/SDR (Rapport de l Enquête Agricole de Conjoncture EAC 2015/2016) Result question 1b: To what extent has your programme contributed to this result? Despite recurrent droughts have caused significant food shortages in 2005, 2007, 2010 and 2012, and the crisis policy since 2012, Mali has managed to achieve objectives of the MDG targets in This success can be attributed to sectoral policies and strategies implemented many years in order to improve the legal framework, better manage water resources and help vulnerable groups.the Embassy has actively participated on Water and Land reforms by suppoting the National Investment Programme for the Agriculture Sector and IWRM througt Plan de Passage and IWRM activities. The various programs funded by the Embassy have also contributed on the capacity building of producers and facilitated the support of studies and rural development work. Indicator 1: Total number of undernourished people reached (m/f/child), (direct) Indicator 1a: Reached number of people with improved access to appropriate food (direct) Indicator 1b: Reached number of people whose nutritional situation became more resilient to possible stresses and/or shocks (direct) Indicator 1c: Reached number of people (m/f/child) with improved food intake (direct) Indicator 2: Agricultural yield of main crops in t/ha (rice) 3.3 (2012)(t/ha) 5,0 (t/ha) 3,3(t/ha) 4,0(t/ha) 4,2(t/ha) 4.5 (t/ha) Indicator 3: Quantity of water consumed in m3/ha (2012) (m3/ha) 9 000(m3/ha) 8 000(m3/ha) 8 000(m3/ha) 8 000(m3/ha) Reports ON, PDIN II, discussions with IER, data from irrigation project Baguineda Reports ON, PDIN II, discussions with IER, data from irrigation project Baguineda Indicator 4: Realisation of training activities, studies, demonstrations Supported projects by the Embassy

3 Assessment of results achieved by NL across the entire Result Area 1 Reduce malnutrition B. Results achieved as planned Embassy has supported and contributed to improved agricultural practices, including increased water productivity and decreased water consumption in both the rainy and dry seasons. The introducing of onion seeds for rainy season and the LVHD (Little Volume Hight Density) on modern fish farming will increase the resilience for Malian people related to food secuity. Implications for planning: The activities on food security improvement are on-going and are expected to reach their targets and outcomes on years 2016/17. The value chain program on onion/ sjalot and fish has started various demonstrations for fish (05) and onion/sjalot(40) and will made it on scale starting More than people will be involved with 25,200 on sjalot/onion and on fish related activities. Result Area 2 Result question 2a: To what extent has inclusive and sustainable growth in the agricultural sector been realised? Promote agricultural growth (included livestock and fish) The cereals balance sheet shows a net surplus of tones in 2015 with a huge weight of rice and maize (60%). The production of onions, traditional fishing rose as compared to 2015.The rice production rose to 7.58 % and traditionnal fish farming increased to 15 % from 2014 to Indicator 1: Volume of production per labour unit by classes of farming/pastoral/forestry enterprise size 2 889,6 Kg /Ha(2014) 2 778,3 Kg/Ha 3 462,23 Kg/Ha 3 381,56 Kg/Ha 3167 K/Ha (Rice ) DEP PEA final report 2014, Bilan de campagne agriocole 2015 Indicator 2: Average income of small-scale food producers, by sex and indigenous status FCFA (2014 by househod) FCFA FCFA FCFA DEP PEA final report 2014 Indicator 3: Production onions/sjalots (T) (2012) Mopti Segou (2012) Mopti Segou (growth rate : 31%) (est) (est) Interprofession Echalotte/Oignon (IFEO) Indicator 4: Production fish farming (T) 2795 (2011) 137 (food crisis) , , 8 Direction National de Peche (DNP) Annual Report 2015 Indicator 5: Production traditional fish farming (T) (2012) (growth rate %) CPS/SDR (Rapport de l Enquête Agricole de Conjoncture EAC 2015/2016) Indicator 6: Rice Production(T) (2012) (growth rate %) , (+7,58 %) CPS/Rapport de l Enquête Agricole de Conjoncture EAC 2015/2016) Result question 2b: To what extent has your programme contributed to this result? The completed program DEBPEA (formerly supported by the Dutch Embassy) has contributed significantly on inclusive and growth of sustainabale agriculture with the CASE (Competitive Agribusiness Systems and Enterprises ) for more 28 value chains, 96 Agriculture clusters, more than households reached and actors capacities enhanced on Soil Fertility Integrated Management (GIFT).These results are consolidated with the 2Scale project for some crops (maize, sesame, rice, potato and nutts) for the year 2015, Indicator 1: Total number of farmers reached (m/f/young) (direct) with women interim report 2015 Number of hectares manageg on durable way Indicator 1a: Reached number of farmers (male/female/young) with increased productivity and income (direct) (est) DEP PEA Final report with women DEP PEA Final report 2014, FIBANI, final evaluation report 2015 Indicator 1b: Reached number of farmers with improved access to input/output markets (direct) Indicator 1c: Reached number of farmers whose farming enterprise became more resilient to possible stresses and/or shocks (direct)

4 Assessment of results achieved by NL across the entire Result Area 2 Promote agricultural growth (included livestock and fish) C. Results achieved poorer than planned The value chain program started later than expected so there are are no significant results in The major activities of this year are baseline studies and demonstrations tests for onion/sjalot and fish farming with LVHD (Little Volume Hight Density) tests. Implications for planning: The Embassy will request a speeding up of interventions within the Value chain project team. Result Area 3 Result question 3a: To what extent have ecologically sustainable food systems been created? Create ecologically sustainable food systems With the programs PACOP, PASARC, PADIN II in Mopti region, and GAO + program in Gao region good progress has been made on sustainable management of natural ressources. This has partially also been reported in the Water fiche as far as irrigation is concerned. Here the combined data for irrigated and rainfed agriculture are presented. Indicator 1: Proportion of agricultural area under productive and sustainable agriculture (ha) (2012) PACOP, PASARC, PADIN II, GAO+ reports Indicator 2: Number of plant and animal genetic resources for food and agriculture secured in either medium or long term conservation facilities Indicator 3: Proportion of local breeds, classified as being at risk, not-atrisk or unknown level of risk of extinction Result question 3b: To what extent has your programme contributed to this result? As explained under 3a, a number of existing programs are working on this and have well contributed to this result. With CASE and Clusters approach through value chain improvement in Mali, the sustainability of agriculture will be enhanced for each supported value chain by the programme. The indicators mentioned hereunder are too detailed for us, limited data available. Also in our view there is overlap between the suggested indicators - notably 2,3 and 4. Assessment of results achieved by NL across the entire Result Area 3 Create ecologically sustainable food systems B. Results achieved as planned Mali needs reforms to achieve the sustanainable goals for the agricultural sector and the Embassy is supporting the Governement with different programs. At program / project level, useful results have been recorded but at the institutional level more efforts are needed to improve the general situation. More consultation with concerned ministries is required, Implications as well asfor with planning: other development partners.

5 To what extent have general enabling conditions for food and nutrition security (incl. private sector development conditions) been strengthened? (please report here only the type of results that cannot fit under the three food and nutrition security objectives) The broader picture Mali has imported from Netherlands goods for USD 85,711 in 2015 (4.6% of total Imports of goods by Mali) with 59% milk and cereals products and exported USD 10,753,000 (1.2% of total exports of goods from Mali ) to Netherlands, with 61,5% of Edible, fruits, nutes etc, according ITC's trade statistics report From 2014 to 2015 the trade between Mali and Netherlands increased to 3,13 % for Mali importations from Netherlands and 63 % for Mali's exportations to the Netherlands, especially on agrifood sectors. The result depends for a huge part on business links made (105) in 2015 and capacities building programs on Farming, and Private sectors Development Tools (PSD) use on value chains for rice, maize, mango, sesame, and other fruits and nuts. Number of persons (m/f/young) reached/trained with improved technology/skills (direct) Mopti 71% male /46% female interim report 2015 Indicator 1: Number of collaborations established or strengthened (in dedicated programmes) 70 (2010) EKN, Trade missions Indicator 2: Number of institutions strengthened (in dedicated programmes) DRA Value Chain Program, FIBANI Indicator 3: Number of land titles secured (persons (m/f/young) and hectares) Indicator 4: Number of farmers/value chain actors strengthened organisationally Indicator 5: Number of substantial policy changes/reforms contributed to (plus effects) with women with women with women with women PDA, PNSIA interim report 2015, FIBANI final evaluation report Indicator 6: Doing Business Indicator (ranking) 151 (2012) WB