ST. PAUL S COLLEGE PROPERTY. Presentation to ANC 5E01 Saturday, March 18 th, 2017
|
|
- Kory Tucker
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ST. PAUL S COLLEGE PROPERTY Presentation to ANC 5E01 Saturday, March 18 th, 2017
2 SECTION Site Neighborhood Context Evolution of the Plan Landscape Visioning PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS New Paulist Building Residential Architecture Visioning Question & Answer 38 2
3 Aerial View of St. Paul s College THE SITE 3
4 Zoning and Plan Summary Site Area METRIC VALUE 5.5 acres THE SITE Zoning RA-1 # of Units Proposed 62 (Reduced from 93) Allowable F.A.R. Proposed F.A.R (with IZ) ~.86 (w/o Streets) Dwelling Units per Acre 11.3 Allowable Height 40 Proposed Height <= 40 Allowable Stories 3 Proposed Stories 3 Open Area Proposed ~ 3.3 acres Allowable Lot Coverage 40% Proposed Lot Coverage ~ 22% 4
5 Neighborhood Imagery 2800 Block of 5 th Street 2800 Block of 4 th Street NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT 2800 Block of 4 th Street 500 Block of Franklin Street 5
6 Neighborhood Imagery 300 Block of Franklin Street Chancellor s Row NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT Chancellor s Row 2800 Block of 5 th Street 6
7 Relative Density Comparison NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT 7
8 Original Concept January 2016 Feedback Received from OP/HPO*: Suburban plan No new residential should be sited south of the west wing extended of original building ( the viewshed ) Relocation of existing SWM should be considered to allow for greater planning flexibility Consider connecting Regent Place to 4 th Street Townhomes fronting 4 th Street block views into site New parking lot should be removed from in front of original building Open to new Paulist building being sited in the viewshed but final decision would be dependent on design approach EVOLUTION OF THE PLAN 8
9 Revision #1 April 2016 Changes made: Reduced units from 93 to 78 Removed residential from viewshed Relocated SWM Extended Regent Place Removed townhouses fronting 4 th Street Reoriented townhouses - roughly perpendicular to 4 th Removed parking lot in front of original building Created bldg lot for Paulists Feedback received: EVOLUTION OF THE PLAN Plan generally consistent with previous direction (HPO) Too many trees being removed (Neighbors) Too much traffic through Chancellor s Row (Neighbors) Buildings/driveway too close (Neighbors) Loss of open space (Neighbors) Opposed to Regent Place connection (Neighbors) 9
10 Revision #2 October 2016 Changes made: Increased buffer with Chancellor s Row in northern portion of site Created traffic plan to divert nearly all school and (new) residential traffic away from Chancellor s Row and to 4 th Street Shifted school driveway further north away from building Proposed public charrette process to design park area and allow public use EVOLUTION OF THE PLAN Feedback received from OP: Unimaginative plan Not enough trees saved Too little private space for residents Too dense Paulist building as sited not acceptable Too much paving Consider PUD, not BZA Need more info 10
11 Revision #3 December 2016 Changes made: Further reduced units from 78 to 64 Reoriented units. Revised footprint of NPB. Reincorporated tree save Added private courtyard areas for residents Revised grading to reduce retaining walls and integrate site topography into layout of townhouses Reduced pavement Overhauled SWM approach to create more usable open space Reimagined design to integrate townhouses into wooded/landscaped setting Thoughtful design and planning of parks and open spaces Feedback received from OP: EVOLUTION OF THE PLAN Location of NPB is acceptable Preserve additional trees in three specific locations 11
12 Revision #4 January 2017 Changes made: Further reduced units from 64 to 62 Redesigned school s dropoff / parking area to preserve 49 Chestnut Oak Redesigned sidewalk layout to preserve 48 Red Oak Deleted units to preserve 7 additional trees along 4 th Street including a 38 White Oak, 33 Turkey Oak, 24 White Oak and 27 Red Oak Rotated stick of towns in NE corner of site to front existing community EVOLUTION OF THE PLAN 12
13 A. Corner Park Existing Condition LANDSCAPE VISIONING 13
14 A. Corner Park Landscape Vignette LANDSCAPE VISIONING
15 A. Corner Park Representative Images LANDSCAPE VISIONING 15
16 B. The Grove Existing Condition LANDSCAPE VISIONING 16
17 105 B. The Grove Landscape Vignette LANDSCAPE VISIONING
18 B. The Grove Rendering LANDSCAPE VISIONING 18
19 B. The Grove Representative Images LANDSCAPE VISIONING 19
20 C. The Verge Existing Condition LANDSCAPE VISIONING 20
21 C. The Verge Landscape Vignette LANDSCAPE VISIONING 119 Note: To be dedicated to Chancellor s Row residents (if desired). Programming to be determined via charrette. 21
22 C. The Verge Representative Images LANDSCAPE VISIONING 22
23 Bird s Eye View of Proposed Open Space from 4 th Street LANDSCAPE VISIONING 23
24 Section Elevation (from CR through new 4 th Street Connection) EXISTING CR BUILDINGS LANDSCAPE VISIONING 4 TH Street 24
25 E. Private Yard Areas LANDSCAPE VISIONING 25
26 Study of Alternate Building Locations Changes made: Analyzed multiple alternate locations for new Paulist building Building sites on the school parcel were deemed to not be feasible Current proposed location takes advantage of grading to minimize impact on viewshed by retaining significant view corridor Building massing reduces in height as it goes up the hill, focusing the view and lessening its impact on the original building The building sits lower in grade with a 2-story + roof form profile; height above grade is less than adjacent townhouses Proposed grading can also enhance future views of existing building Considered two general grading schemes (vignettes to follow) NEW PAULIST BUILDING Note: Refer to attached Feedback Implementation Chart for greater detail re: comments. 26
27 C. Viewshed Existing Condition NEW PAULIST BUILDING 27
28 Conceptual Footprint and Programming NEW PAULIST BUILDING 28
29 C. Viewshed Representative Images NEW PAULIST BUILDING 29
30 New Paulist Building Elevation Studies EXISTING CR BUILDING NEW PAULIST BUILDING 30
31 New Paulist Building Elevation Studies EXISTING CR BUILDING NEW PAULIST BUILDING EXISTING CR ROOFLINE 31
32 New Paulist Building Elevation Studies EXISTING CR ROOFLINE NEW PAULIST BUILDING EXISTING CR ROOFLINE 32
33 New Paulist Building - Conceptual Elevations NEW PAULIST BUILDING 33
34 New Paulist Building - Conceptual Elevations NEW PAULIST BUILDING 34
35 Analysis of Predominant View Cones Present vs Proposed Present: Proposed: NEW PAULIST BUILDING Current topography obstructs full view of building Proposed grading will open up new views - Current Views - 35
36 Townhome Style Considerations Contemporary and Distinct ARCHITECTURE VISIONING or Traditional and Consistent 36
37 Traditional 16 and 14 Homes Masonry Cornice Detail Masonry Wrap Cementitious Siding/Panel Architectural Shingle Painted Masonry Metal Canopy Shutters Cementitious Siding ARCHITECTURE VISIONING Note: refer to full-size architectural renderings for greater detail 37
38 Traditional 20 Homes Masonry Cornice Detail Masonry Wrap Masonry Wrap Cementitious Siding Cementitious Siding/Panel Cementitious Siding/Panel Metal Canopy Architectural Shingle Painted Masonry ARCHITECTURE VISIONING Note: refer to full-size architectural renderings for greater detail 38
39 ST. PAUL S COLLEGE PROPERTY Question & Answer
Corridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.070 - Corridor Residential Suburban Districts ( CRS ) Sections: Typical Buildings in the CRS District 16.20.070.1 Composition of Suburban Residential Corridors 16.20.070.2 Purpose and Intent
More informationA PPEARANCE REVIEW BOARD
ARB Staff Report A PPEARANCE REVIEW BOARD July 21, 2016 Case Number AGENDA ITEM 4 619, 621, 623 E. PINE ST. THE OLIVE TOWNHOMES ARB2016-00037 Applicant Michael Wenrich Michael Wenrich Architects Owner
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.020 - Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family Districts ( NS ) Sections: Typical Block in a Neighborhood Suburban District 16.20.020.1 History and Composition of Suburban Neighborhoods 16.20.020.2
More informationCorridor Commercial Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.090 - Corridor Commercial Suburban District ( CCS ) CCS-1 CCS-2 Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CCS District INSERT DRAWING: SITE PLAN OF A TYPICAL SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT
More informationCorridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.060 - Corridor Residential Traditional Districts ( CRT ) Typical Buildings in the CRT District Sections: 16.20.060.1 Composition of Traditional Residential Corridors 16.20.060.2 Purpose and
More informationOAK HARBOUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
OAK HARBOUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. PART I: INTRODUCTION ARCHITECHTIRAL CRITERIA 1. Standards and Guidelines 1.1 The Architechtural Criteria consists of established minimum requirements which will
More informationCorridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.070 - Corridor Residential Suburban District ( CRS ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CRS District Sections: 16.20.070.1 Composition of Suburban Residential Corridors 16.20.070.2 Purpose
More information524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study
Attachment D 524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study Prepared for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City November 2015 Prepared by VODA Landscape + Planning www.vodaplan.com TABLE OF
More informationDESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING Multi family housing is an increasingly popular form of infill development in Shaker Heights because of the city s built out
More informationTHE PRESERVE PHASE TWO
THE PRESERVE PHASE TWO i January 17, 2014 Prepared for: Mattamy Development Corp. Prepared by: NAK Design Strategies 1.0 Introduction The Preserve Phase II Tree Canopy Coverage Analysis represents a general
More informationProposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018
Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018 [Add the following new section to R-1A and R-1B (as 19.06.030 and 19.08.0925 respectively)] [19.06.030 / 19.08.025] Neighborhood Design
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA OLD METAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION REPORT : S: Jennifer Van Vrancken, District Chris Roberts, Division A Cynthia Lee-Sheng, Division B ADVERTISING
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.020 Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District ( NS ) Figure REFRENCE Typical Houses in Neighborhood Suburban 1 Figure REFRENCE Typical Block in a Neighborhood Suburban District Sections: 16.20.020.1
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA OLD METAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION REPORT : OM--17 S: Jennifer Van Vrancken, District Christopher L. Roberts, Division A Cynthia Lee-Sheng, Division
More informationCorridor Commercial Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.080 - Corridor Commercial Traditional District ( CCT ) CCT-1 Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CCT District CCT-2 Sections: 16.20.080.1 Composition of Corridor Commercial Traditional 16.20.080.2
More informationSLOT HOME N TASK FORCE MEETING #8 PACKET
SLOT HOME N TASK FORCE MEETING #8 PACKET Introduction Task Force Meeting #8 will be a review of the testing outcomes and community feedback on the draft strategies in Mixed Use (MX, RX, MS), Multi Unit
More informationRZ-1 LEGEND FUTURE ACCESS TO ALIGN W/ EXISTING HARRIS COVE DRIVE FUTURE ACCESS TO ALIGN WITH PROPOSED ACCESS OPPOSITE COX ROAD
ZONED RU(CD) ZONED RU(CD) LEGEND FUTURE ACCESS TO ALIGN W/ EXISTING HARRIS COVE DRIVE ZONED R-9PUD ZONED R-9PUD ZONED RU(CD) ZONED R-9PUD FUTURE ACCESS TO ALIGN WITH PROPOSED ACCESS OPPOSITE COX ROAD RZ-1
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Multi-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.030 - Neighborhood Suburban Multi-Family District ( NSM ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Multi-Family Uses in NSM Sections: 16.20.030.1 Composition of Suburban Multi-family Neighborhoods 16.20.030.2 Purpose
More informationNORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND PRESTON ROAD AREA PLAN Advisory Task Force Meeting # 4 February 16, 2016
NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND PRESTON ROAD AREA PLAN Advisory Task Force Meeting # 4 February 16, 2016 1 DRAFT SCENARIOS - Alternative Scenarios Overview area - they are not to be considered as future plans for
More informationNeighborhood Traditional Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.010 - Neighborhood Traditional Single-Family Districts ( NT ) Typical Houses in a Neighborhood Traditional District Typical Block in a Neighborhood Traditional District Common Features of
More informationCorridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.060 - Corridor Residential Traditional District ( CRT ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CRT District Sections: 16.20.060.1 Composition of Traditional Residential Corridors 16.20.060.2 Purpose
More informationARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA FOR CAMBRIDGE ESTATES
ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA FOR CAMBRIDGE ESTATES PART I: INTRODUCTION 1. Standards and Guidelines 1.1 The Architectural Criteria consists of established minimum requirements which will be used to regulate
More informationRequest Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval
Applicant C and C Development Co, Inc. Property Owner ETCPAC, LLC Public Hearing February 13, 2019 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 4 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria
More information10 April 10, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: CHALICE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, INC.
10 April 10, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: CHALICE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, INC. REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit for Religious Use (Church) STAFF PLANNER: Stephen J. White ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION:
More informationTHE PRESERVE PHASE THREE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE ANALYSIS. Second Submission: March 2, 2016
THE PRESERVE PHASE THREE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE ANALYSIS i Second Submission: March 2, 2016 Prepared for: Mattamy Development Corp. Prepared by: NAK Design Strategies THE PRESERVE PHASE 3 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
More information1530 Grizzly Peak Blvd. Lot 598
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION JULY 12, 2012 1530 Grizzly Peak Blvd. Lot 598 Use Permit #11-10000016 to construct a two-story, 3,183 square foot single-family
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: APRIL 20, 2016 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Jennifer Le, Principal
More informationResidential Uses in the Historic Village Core
BLACK DIAMOND DESIGN GUIDLINES for Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core Adopted June 18, 2009 Introduction and Purpose These guidelines are intended to guide infill development within the Historic
More informationINTENT OBJECTIVES HISTORIC DESIGNATIONS
TOWN OF LOS GATOS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ALL SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS IN ALL ZONES EXCEPT THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES INTENT These development
More informationWith Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation
MESA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS HANDBOOK With Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation November 14, 2011 1 INDEX A. Purpose... 1 B. Applicability... 1 C. Design Standards... 2 1. Site
More informationWHEREAS, the proposed Land Management Code (LMC) amendments enhance the design standards to maintain aesthetic experience of Park City; and
Exhibit A Draft Ordinance Ordinance 2019-07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND MANAGEMENT CODE OF PARK CITY, UTAH, AMENDING SECTIONS 15-2.1-6 DEVELOPMENT ON STEEP SLOPES, 15-2.2-3 LOT AND SITE REQUIREMENTS,
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue February 5, 2015
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Applicant: Fernando Silva Staff: Katia Pace (801) 535-6354 or katia.pace@slcgov.com Tax ID: 09-31-340-039 Current Zone: RMF-35 Moderate Density Multifamily Terrace
More information# Mercyhealth Hospital Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission
#2017-38 Mercyhealth Hospital Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Dates: December 6, 2017 and January 3, 2018 Requests: 1. Preliminary Planned Unit Development and 2. Special Use
More information# 7 ) UN MY PLACE HOTEL SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING
# 7 ) UN-53-16 MY PLACE HOTEL SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Meeting date: September 14, 2016 Item: UN-53-16 Prepared by: Marc Jordan GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant:
More informationAccessory Dwelling Unit Permit Submittal Requirement Checklist (Corte Madera Municipal Code Section 18.31)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 300 TAMALPAIS DRIVE CORTE MADERA, CA 94925 Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit Submittal Requirement Checklist (Corte Madera Municipal Code Section 18.31) Address of Project Site Definition:
More informationEASTERN SE & 750 CHERRY SE - REQUEST FOR NEW BUILDINGS
Planning Staff Report Meeting Date: November 1, 2017 215-255 EASTERN SE & 750 CHERRY SE - REQUEST FOR NEW BUILDINGS BACKGROUND: The project in question is in regards to two new buildings previously approved
More informationResidential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS ORDINANCE DRAFT 9 AUGUST 2013 17.25 Residential Design Standards 17.25.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum design standards for new residential
More informationCity Commission Workshop
Causeway Boulevard Corridor Study City of Dunedin, Florida City Commission Workshop January 10, 2012 Causeway Boulevard Corridor Study City of Dunedin, Florida Workshop Agenda Where we re at in the process.
More informationARTICLE 623. PD 623. PD 623 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on September 25, (Ord.
ARTICLE 623. PD 623. SEC. 51P-623.101. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. PD 623 was established by Ordinance No. 25033, passed by the Dallas City Council on September 25, 2002. (Ord. 25033) SEC. 51P-623.102. PROPERTY
More informationCANNON RIDGE HOMES ASSOCIATION
Resolution 2013-01 CANNON RIDGE HOMES ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTION OF ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE; RULES RELATED TO EXTERIOR PAINT AND STAIN COLORS, WINDOWS, ROOFS, DECKS,
More informationMONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Decker Appeal of MBAR Denial
MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Decker Appeal of MBAR Denial Deputy Director: Dave Ward Staff Report Date: August 17, 2009 Division: Development Review South Case Nos.: 09APL-00000-00020;
More informationGraydon-Banning / Shevchenko (NORTH OAKVILLE)
Graydon-Banning / Shevchenko (NORTH OAKVILLE) Tree Canopy Coverage Analysis Prepared by: NAK Design Strategies Prepared for: Martillac Estates Inc. September 9, 2016 02 GRAYDON-BANNING/SHEVCHENKO NORTH
More information1951 SHATTUCK AVENUE. D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t. Continued Preliminary Design Review
D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t 1951 SHATTUCK AVENUE For Discussion / Majority Recommendations MARCH 21, 2019 Continued Preliminary Design Review Design Review #DRCP2018-0005
More informationSingle Family District
Alley Single Family District R1 4.01 Intent: The R1 Single Family District is established to protect, promote and maintain the development of single family dwellings, as well as provide for limited public
More informationPEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED BUILDING B - Since building B is sited along an established residential street, its architectural language and built form
driveway entry that also doubles as an increased spacial buffer towards the adjacent low-rise Church rectory. In addition to the large spatial buffer at this boundary, the building mass also transitions
More informationProposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Final Draft Revised 08/29/2018
Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Final Draft Revised 08/29/2018 Drafting Notes: The 8/29/18 draft reflects the following changes from the 7/25/18 draft based on City Council and/or Planning Commission
More informationSLOT HOME STRATEGY OVERVIEW
ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY SLOT HOME STRATEGY OVERVIEW In recent years, slot homes have been constructed in many neighborhoods throughout Denver, resulting in a new development pattern that can detract from the
More informationLDR RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE C.O.W. January 19, 2017
LDR 2017-01 RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE C.O.W. January 19, 2017 SECTION NO. SECTION TITLE COMPLEXITY DESCRIPTION 1. 16.20.010.5. Maximum development potential Problem Statement:
More informationArchitectural and Landscape Guidelines
Architectural and Landscape Guidelines Introduction The document outlines the opportunities and constraints associated with the Wolf Creek Village development and provides a set of subdivision guidelines
More informationLegacy Existing Homes Design Guidelines and Submittal Requirements
Owners are required to submit plans for all new site work, landscaping, structures, improvements, and other items placed on a lot or exterior of any existing structure (the Improvements ). New home construction
More informationPLNPCM Verizon Wireless Rooftop Antenna Conditional Use CONDITIONAL USE
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To: From: Salt Lake City Planning Commission Lex Traughber, (801) 535-6184, lex.traughber@slcgov.com Date: May 25, 2016 Re: PLNPCM2016-00204
More informationResidential Design Guidelines Village of Elwood, Illinois
Residential Design Guidelines Village of Elwood, Illinois 1. PURPOSE The Village of Elwood Comprehensive Plan provides that single-family housing will be one of the largest land uses within the Village.
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC & PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue January 15, 2015
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC2014-00576 & PLNHLC2014-00823 171 East 3 rd Avenue January 15, 2015 Applicant: Fernando Silva Staff: Katia Pace (801) 535-6354 or
More informationStaff Review Date: February 14, 2018 HDC PID#
Charlotte Historic District Commission Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness Staff Review Date: February 14, 2018 HDC 2017-682 PID# 07103504 LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUMMARY
More informationPROPERTY IMPROVEMENT / ACCESSORY / DESIGN / DEMO APPLICATION
PLANNING & ZONING 2829 MINERVA LAKE RD COLUMBUS OH 43231 PHONE: 614-882-5743 FAX: 614-882-0701 PERMIT NO: MP NO. RECD BY DATE: PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT / ACCESSORY / DESIGN / DEMO APPLICATION USE FOR: Accessory
More information4 May 14, 2014 Public Hearing
4 May 14, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MID ATLANTIC COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES PROPERTY OWNER: 336 CEDAR ROAD LLC STAFF PLANNER: Kevin Kemp REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Gas Station with Convenience Store)
More informationDEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES The following provides a summary of the language and methodology changes that have been approved by the SunPAC for the commercial zone and applied to residential
More informationREQUEST FOR ACTION CHASKA CITY COUNCIL APRIL 16, 2018
REQUEST FOR ACTION CHASKA CITY COUNCIL APRIL 16, 2018 Agenda Item No. 8 Subject: Applicant: Former Hot Spot and Michael s Cycles - Concept Plan Alliance Contracting, Inc. and RDS Architects Locations:
More informationRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES (RF)
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES (RF) Planning Division DENSITY STANDARDS (MMC 17.12.010) Lot Size (applies to the creation of new lots or lot line adjustments) ZONE MINIMUM LOT AREA MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: MAY 1, 2013 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Jennifer Le, Senior
More informationDRAFT Queen Street Community. in the City of Brampton. Addendum to the Creditview Crossing Community Design Guidelines. April 2017.
1403 Queen Street Community in the City of Brampton Addendum to the Creditview Crossing Community Design Guidelines Prepared by: Prepared for: April 2017 DRAFT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1
More informationArticle 5: Supplemental to Zones
Article 5: Supplemental to Zones Division 5.1: Building Type Standards Page 5-1 5.1.10 Purpose 5-1 5.1.20 Applicability 5-1 5.1.30 Building Types Overview 5-1 5.1.40 Carriage House 5-6 5.1.50 Estate House
More informationARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES FOR LAKE ZACHARY LAKE ZACHARY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION
FOR LAKE ZACHARY BY LAKE ZACHARY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION THESE ARE WRITTEN PRIMARILY FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, BUT THESE STANDARDS ALSO APPLY TO ANY ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS OR REPAINTING OF EXISTING STRUCTURES
More informationSingle Family District
Alley Single Family District R1 4.01 Intent: The R1 Single Family District is established to protect, promote and maintain the development of single family dwellings, as well as provide for limited public
More informationTHE PENINSULA NEIGHBORHOOD CODE
THE PENINSULA NEIGHBORHOOD CODE Revised March 2012 GOVERNING CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PENINSULA NEIGHBORHOOD COMPONENTS OF THE PENINSULA NEIGHBORHOOD CODE The Peninsula Neighborhood is a new neighborhood
More informationSpecial Use Permit Application Martin Street Property
Special Use Permit Application Martin Street Property Submitted to City of Reno February 08, 2016 Prepared for PCD Asset Group 2760 Camino Diablo Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared by Martin Street Property
More informationA. Applicability and Review Authority.
5.6 Development Plans Required for Architectural and Site Design Review in the TC: Town Center District, the R-U: Urban Residential District and the MU: Mixed Use District. Intent In order to: assure the
More information137 Beechwood Avenue Design Brief. Prepared by
Design Brief Prepared by Existing Site Plan The proposal requests permission of the City of Ottawa for Site Plan Control of. The proposed development of the site envisions the intensification of the lot,
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report
3330 South 1300 East Millcreek, UT 84106 801-214-2700 millcreek.us File # CU-18-014 Planning Commission Staff Report Meeting Date: September 19, 2018 Applicant: Simple Homes LLC Property Address: 3350
More informationAPPLICATION FOR Second Dwelling Unit
PLANNING DIVISION 411 Main Street (530) 879-6800 P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 www.chicoca.gov Application No. APPLICATION FOR Second Dwelling Unit Applicant Information Applicant Name Applicant Street
More informationCity of Oviedo Development Services Department 400 Alexandria Boulevard, Oviedo, Florida, 32765, (407)
City of Oviedo Development Services Department 400 Alexandria Boulevard, Oviedo, Florida, 32765, (407) 971-5796 Lockwood Charter School COMPLIANCE REVIEW 1 Project Number: 15-1194-SDOFE/Arch. Order Plans
More informationSUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES
SUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR WYNDSOR GROVE (Lots 1-50, Block A, Lots 17-47, Block B; and Lots 1-10, Block C of the Record Plat for Wyndsor Grove as Recorded in Volume N, Pages 849 et. al. in the Real
More informationREPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento
REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramnto.org 9 PUBLIC HEARING November 17, 2016 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: MARCH 15, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director Monique
More informationChapel Hill Historic District Certificate of Appropriateness Application Project Description:
Town of Chapel Hill Office of Planning and Sustainability QUESTIONS? Development Services 919-969-5066 Call or email us! planning@townofchapelhill.org Chapel Hill Historic District Certificate of Appropriateness
More informationBonaventure of Thornton Senior Living Planned Developed Standards October 23, 2015 Revised: December 9, A. Statement of Intent
Bonaventure of Thornton Senior Living Planned Developed Standards October 23, 2015 Revised: December 9, 2015 A. Statement of Intent These Planned Development (PD) Standards will permit the development
More informationCITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA
CITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES SUB AREA 3 PURPOSE Architectural Review by its nature is a creative and largely subjective process. These Guidelines are intended to allow
More informationARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RULES
4th Addition Home Owners Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RULES Adopted by the Forest Hills 4 th Addition Architectural Updated 9/6/11 Review Committee Objective of Architectural Review Committee
More informationBROWNE S ADDITION HD: DESIGN REVIEW OVERVIEW. Overview of District Design Review in general Standards for New Construction
BROWNE S ADDITION HD: DESIGN REVIEW OVERVIEW Overview of District Design Review in general Standards for New Construction OVERVIEW Betsy Bradley, representing Borth Preservation Consulting LLC Consultants
More informationCHAPTER 15 THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA
CHAPTER 15 THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA The Commercial District Character Area constitutes the business core of the historic downtown, in which most buildings were constructed with storefronts
More informationRESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN (RAD) REVIEW STANDARDS AND PROCESS
RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN (RAD) REVIEW STANDARDS AND PROCESS The Residential Architectural Design (RAD) Review process was adopted by the El Cerrito City Council in 1994. It was intended to strike
More informationPublic and Institutional Development
Public and Institutional Development Facts to Know INTRODUCTION: In the City of Commerce City, there is one Public zone district, as follows: PUBLIC: Public Zone District Each zone district in Commerce
More informationRE: Letter of Intent Land Use Application for Plan Commission and UDC Initial/ Final Approval Request
TO: City of Madison Planning Division 126 S. Hamilton Street Madison, WI 53701 Jessica Vaughn Department of Planning & Development City of Madison 126 S. Hamilton Street Madison, WI 53701 RE: Letter of
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 21, 2013 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Jennifer Le, Senior
More informationB. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section Class 1 of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION SEPTEMBER 10, 2009 1655 Solano Avenue Use Permit #09-10000036 to modify an existing building used as a dental clinic by
More information3 December 11, 2013 Public Hearing
3 December 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT : HALL AUTOMOTIVE, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: AUTO PROPERTIES HALL NISSAN VIRGINIA BEACH, AUTO PROPERTIES HALL COLLISION, VIRGINIA E. CORNICK TRUST STAFF PLANNER:
More informationLDR RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE D.R.C. June 7, 2017
LDR 2017-01 RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE D.R.C. June 7, 2017 SECTION NO. SECTION TITLE COMPLEXITY DESCRIPTION 1. 16.20.010.5. Problem Statement: Concerns have been expressed
More informationCommunity Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 15, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 7.A File No. 18-0004 HARVEST
More informationEXHIBIT V G LEHIGH ACRES DESIGN STANDARDS CHECKLIST LEHIGH ACRES PLANNING COMMUNITY
EXHIBIT V G LEHIGH ACRES DESIGN CHECKLIST LEHIGH ACRES PLANNING COMMUNITY a. b. c. a. b. c. a. b. c. COMMERCIAL DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS - BASIC ELEMENTS [LCLDC Section reference] Parking. In addition
More informationCommercial Development
Commercial Development Facts to Know INTRODUCTION: In the City of Commerce City, there are three commercial zone districts. They are as follows: C-1: Local Commercial District C-2: General Commercial District
More informationMATURE NEIGHBOURHOOD OVERLAY REGULATIONS
OVERLAY REGULATIONS Effective September 1, 2017 On May 29, City Council approved the following changes to the Mature Neighbourhood Overlay (Section 814 of Edmonton Zoning Bylaw 12800). These new regulations
More informationStaff Recommendation: Staff recommends final approval of 15-DRB9 subject to the following conditions:
Meeting of February 25, 2015 Petition 15-DRB7 Address: 894 Airport-Pulling Road North Project: 15-DRB7 (P) Clean Machine Car Wash Company / Name of Architect: Stephen Seaton, Linea Design Network Staff
More informationRESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. June 17, 2014
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-0198 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council June 17, 2014 AMENDING THE PARKEBRIDGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND SCHEMATIC PLAN FOR THE PARKEBRIDGE POST SUBDIVISION MODIFICATION
More informationCHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PORT HURON
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PORT HURON 3800 Lapeer Road Phone: (810) 987-6600 Port Huron Twp., Michigan 48060 Fax: (810) 987-6712 www.porthurontownship.org KLavigne@PortHuronTownship.org MEMORANDUM To: Chairman
More informationCITY OF NEW ORLEANS Vieux Carré Commission
VIEUX CARRE COMMISSION ESTABLISHED 1936 CITY OF NEW ORLEANS Vieux Carré Commission Guidelines for New Construction, Additions & Demolition New CoNstruCtioN, AdditioNs & demolition New building construction
More informationREPORT TO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CITY OF Community Development Department Planning Division Meeting Date: January 18, 2012 Case Numbers: CDR11-001 Project Planner: Sarjit Dhaliwal (415) 485-3397 REPORT TO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SUBJECT:
More informationCity of Lafayette Staff Report
City of Lafayette Staff Report For: By: Design Review Commission Chris Juram, Planning Technician Meeting Date: May 23, 2016 Subject: SS07-16 Lauren & Marc Rubenstein (Owners) R-10 Zoning: Request for
More informationHoldener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE
Holdener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE As approved by City Council June 24, 2002 City of Enumclaw Holdener Farm Area PUD Design Guidelines Phase One TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationRESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES - INFILL
Residential Infill INTRODUCTION University Park experienced three significant building booms at the end of the 19 th and beginning of the 20 th century. These resulted in the great wealth of historic houses
More informationPlanning Commission Staff Report Project Plan Approval Hearing Date: June 24, 2015
Planning Commission Staff Report Project Plan Approval Hearing Date: June 24, 2015 ITEM 4 Provo City s Energy Department requests Final Project Plan approval to rebuild and expand the Energy Department
More information