Draft Technical Background for Rule Change Proposal 1 to 01 JAN 2018 version
|
|
- Denis Higgins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers Draft Technical Background for Rule Change Proposal 1 to 01 JAN 2018 version Notes: (1) These Rule Changes enter into force on 1 st July Copyright in these Common Structural Rules is owned by each IACS Member as at 1st January Copyright IACS The IACS members, their affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents (on behalf of whom this disclaimer is given) are, individually and collectively, referred to in this disclaimer as the "IACS Members". The IACS Members assume no responsibility and shall not be liable whether in contract or in tort (including negligence) or otherwise to any person for any liability, or any direct, indirect or consequential loss, damage or expense caused by or arising from the use and/or availability of the information expressly or impliedly given in this document, howsoever provided, including for any inaccuracy or omission in it. For the avoidance of any doubt, this document and the material contained in it are provided as information only and not as advice to be relied upon by any person. Any dispute concerning the provision of this document or the information contained in it is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts and will be governed by English law.
2 Contents CHAPTER 2 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DESIGN... 3 SECTION 3 COMPARTMENT ARRANGEMENT... 3 CHAPTER 3 STRCUTURAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES... 4 SECTION 3 corrosion additions... 4 SECTION 6 STRUCTURAL DETAIL PRINCIPLES... 4 CHAPTER 7 DIRECT STRENGTH ANALYSIS... 6 SECTION 3 local structural strength analysis... 6 CHAPTER 10 OTHER STRUCTURES... 8 SECTION 1 FORE PART... 8 SECTION 3 AFT PART CHAPTER 12 CONSTRUCTION SECTION 3 DESIGN OF WELDED JOINTS SECTION 3 DESIGN OF WELDED JOINTS SECTION 3 DESIGN OF WELDED JOINTS RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 2 OF 14
3 Part 1 General Rule Requirements CHAPTER 2 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DESIGN SECTION 3 COMPARTMENT ARRANGEMENT 2 DOUBLE BOTTOM 2.3 Height of double bottom The proposal is to clarify how to measure the height of double bottom for oil tanker. The measurement of double bottom height for tanker is based on MARPOL Regulation , Figure 1. At any cross-section, the depth of each double bottom tank or space shall be such that the distance h between the bottom of the cargo tanks and the moulded line of the bottom shell plating measured at right angles to the bottom shell plating as shown in figure 1 is not less than specified below: h = B/15 (m) or h = 2.0 m, whichever is the lesser. The minimum value of h = 1.0 m Figure 1 There is no impact on scantlings due to this change. RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 3 OF 14
4 CHAPTER 3 STRCUTURAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 CORROSION ADDITIONS 1 GENERAL 1.2 Corrosion addition determination, Table 1 This proposal is made to clarify how to determine the corrosion addition for slop tank. In current designs, the slop tank is usually designed as a cargo oil tank and in actual operation, the slop tank carries cargo oil in most of the time. The corrosion environment is also considered to be the same as for cargo oil tanks and the same corrosion addition should be applied, even though it is used as a storage tank for washing oil/water in limited part of the time. Therefore, it is proposed to add a new description for the slop tank in Table. 1. Please also find the corrosion margin comparison for the inner bottom plating with two different approaches. Compartment 1 Compartment 2 Required corrosion margin Slop tank considered as heated Double bottom ballast tank = 4.5 mm cargo tank Slop tank considered as ballast tank Double bottom ballast tank = 3.0 mm There is no impact on scantlings due to this change since the slop tank is usually designed as cargo oil tank. SECTION 6 STRUCTURAL DETAIL PRINCIPLES 3 STIFFENERS 3.4 SNIPED ENDS The proposal is to clarify the application area for in the vicinity of engines or generators or propeller impulse zone in [3.4.1]. The application area of stiffeners with sniped ends is not clear with the Rules issued on 1 Jan 2018 and the rule change proposal clarifies that in the vicinity of engines or generators means in the machinery space and propeller impulse zone is in the stern area. There is no impact on scantlings due to this change. RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 4 OF 14
5 3.4.2 The proposal is to clarify the application of requirements. The Rules issued on 1 Jan 2018 requires that the tapering of sniped stiffeners are not to be more than 30. This requirement is intended to be applied for the load bearing members with relatively longer span to mitigate hard spot due to plate bending. For shorter span, the original rules require the stiffener to be triangle with the reduced height due to 30 tapering as shown in Figure 1 so an alternative solution need to be considered in this case. Figure 1: Sniped stiffener at the narrow space The following details may be considered as an alternative solution. One side taper Lap type connection There is no impact on scantlings due to this change. RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 5 OF 14
6 CHAPTER 7 DIRECT STRENGTH ANALYSIS SECTION 3 LOCAL STRUCTURAL STRENGTH ANALYSIS 2 LOCAL AREAS TO BE ASSESSED BY FINE MESH ANALYSIS 2.1 List of mandatory structural details List of structural details The proposal is made to make a mandatory fine mesh analysis for the bracket at the heel of horizontal stringer. The bracket at the heel of horizontal stringers in way of transverse bulkheads is not included in the list of mandatory fine mesh analysis in Pt 1. Ch 7, Sec 3, [2.1.1]. In addition, the screening factor in Table 6 is not applicable for brackets which cannot be modelled properly in the cargo hold FE model due to the size of bracket i.e 600 mm mm. Consequently, there is neither direct fine mesh analysis nor screening requirements defined in Pt 1, Ch 7, Sec 3, table 6, so the proposal is made to take into account the different shape and size of these brackets by direct fine mesh analysis as shown in Figure 1. If the size of bracket is able to be reflected in cargo hold FE model with suitable number of element along the edge of bracket then, the screening requirements in Pt 1, Ch 7, Sec 3, table 6 can be applied. The recommended brackets are defined in Pt.1 Ch.9 Sec.6 Table 9 Design standard I-transverse bulkhead horizontal stringer heel. Figure 1: RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 6 OF 14
7 The shape or scantling of bracket at the heel may need to be improved Bracket at the heel of horizontal stringer [2.1.7] is newly made to support rule change for [2.1.1] The selection of fine mesh analysis is described in this new paragraph [2.1.7]. The location with maximum yield utilization found in cargo hold coarse mesh analysis (See Figure 1) is to be chosen for the local fine mesh analysis with 50x50mm mesh size. If the geometry, scantling or mesh size are significantly different compared with the typical detail, then this location is to be analysed additionally. The recommended brackets can be found in Pt.1 Ch.9 Sec.6 Table 9 Design standard I-transverse bulkhead horizontal stringer heel. Figure 1: Cargo hold coarse mesh model The shape or scantling of small backing bracket may need to be improved. 3 SCREENING PROCEDURE 3.2 List of structural details RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 7 OF 14
8 3.2.2 Outside midship cargo hold region The proposal is made to make a screening requirement for the bracket at the heel of horizontal stringer outside midship cargo hold region. The bracket at the heel of horizontal stringer is newly added in [2.1.1] as a mandatory structural detail for fine mesh FEA in the midship cargo hold region and the screening requirement shall therefore be considered outside the midship cargo hold region. The screening procedure is the same as the connections of corrugation to adjoining structure so the screening stress concentration factor, K SC, can be found in Pt 1, Ch 7, Sec,3 Table 4. The shape or scantling of backing brackets outside midship cargo hold region may need to be improved. 3.3 Screening criteria Screening factors and permissible screening factors The proposal is made to specify the screening factors, λ sc, and permissible screening factors, λ scperm, for brackets at the heel of horizontal stringer outside midship cargo hold region. A requirement for bracket is newly added in table 4 to be in line with rule change proposal of [3.2.2] The shape or scantling of backing bracket outside midship cargo hold region may need to be improved. CHAPTER 10 OTHER STRUCTURES SECTION 1 FORE PART 3 STRUCTURE SUBJECTED TO IMPACT LOADS 3.2 BOTTOM SLAMMING Shell plating The Rule change is to clarify the requirements about bilge plating thickness within cylindrical part of the ship for the bottom slamming pressure. The extent of strengthening due to slamming pressure is significantly increased for bulk carrier (0.17L to 0.3L from F.P.) and now applicable even for transversely stiffened bilge plating within the cylindrical part of the ship. RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 8 OF 14
9 Rules issued on 1 Jan 2018 is applicable for the flat of bottom and adjacent plating with attached stiffeners (Longitudinally stiffened panels) up to a height of 500 mm above the base line so this rule change is a clarification for the transversely stiffened bilge plating. Please also note that transversely stiffened bilge plating within cylindrical part is most likely located between 0.23L and 0.3L from the F.P (See A below) and the slamming pressure in this area is not maximum. A direct fine mesh analysis with mesh size of 50 x 50 mm was carried out to prove that the capacity of bilge plating within cylindrical part of the ship has enough strength with respect to the bottom slamming pressure. A capsize bulk carrier was chosen since the large part of bilge plating within cylindrical part of the ship is still inside 0.3L from F.P (Slamming Zone). The local model was prepared in accordance with Pt 1, Ch 7 and includes all relevant structures within hopper tank as shown in Figure 1. The slamming pressure is calculated in accordance with Pt 1, Ch 4, Sec 5, [3.2] at the location where the maximum pressure is expected for the bilge plating as shown in Figure 1. The total surface stress including both bending and membrane stresses at the upper and lower plate surface together with the deformation were evaluated and plotted in Figure 2. The maximum stresses are found at the long edge of flat bottom plating due to the plate bending. However, the total stress level in way of the bilge plating is found to be much lower than that of the flat bottom plating since only the lower part of the bilge plating up to 500 mm from the base line is exposed to the slamming pressure and the plate bending stress is significantly reduced due to the curvature of the bilge plating, even if the membrane stress is increased slightly. RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 9 OF 14
10 Figure 1: FE local model and load application Figure 2: Stress plots for both surface Figure 3: Deformation RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 10 OF 14
11 There may be slight impact on material yield strength of bilge plating in some cases but the results are more rational. SECTION 3 AFT PART 3 STERN FRAMES 3.2 Propeller posts Gross scantlings of propeller posts The Rule change proposal is to clarify the requirements. The wording of those above is replaced by Table 1 and Table 2 to clarify the requirements. Scantling impact is not expected Section modulus below the propeller shaft bossing The Rule change proposal is to remove confliction between [3.2.1] and [3.2.2]. [3.2.1] is applicable for the typical current design of propeller post without sole piece and the second paragraph of [3.2.1] allows deviations in scantlings and proportions required by Table 1 & 2 provided the RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 11 OF 14
12 strength integrity i.e the section modulus of the propeller post is kept based on Table 1 & 2, while the paragraph of [3.2.2] allow section modulus deviation, conflicting with [3.2.1]. To keep consistency of the Rule, [3.2.2] is removed. Typical design has same thickness for both below and above the propeller shaft bossing so no scantling impact is expected otherwise there might be slight impact on scantling. CHAPTER 12 CONSTRUCTION SECTION 3 DESIGN OF WELDED JOINTS 2 TEE OR CROSS JOINT 2.5 Weld size criteria (Table 1: Minimum leg size) The proposal is made to clarify the minimum leg size for 3m below top of compartment. In Table 1, additional leg length of 0.5mm is required for areas within 3m below top of a compartment. This requirement is originally taking into account the excessive corrosion of this area. The corrosion addition specified in Pt.1, Ch.3, Sec.3, Table 1 has the same categorization of Within 3m below top of tank for cargo oil tanks and ballast tanks. The corrosion addition in CSR-OT and CSR-BC basically follow the same philosophy and it is understandable that the top part of tanks would be a more corrosive environment compared with Elsewhere in the tank due to the presence of high salty and humid vapour during hot weather (sun effects). On the other hand, the table for minimum leg size in this Chapter has categorization of Welds within 3m below top of compartment for welds both in water ballast/cargo tanks and also in fresh water tanks, fuel/diesel oil/other tanks, dry spaces and voids. In addition, it is not specified that the 3m below top of compartment are to be considered only for spaces located immediately below the weather deck. It is desirable to resolve the current discrepancy between these two requirements for corrosion additions and minimum leg sizes in terms of the types of compartments for which excessive corrosion is expected. It is proposed to amend the minimum leg length requirements so as to be in line with the requirements for corrosion addition, i.e. the application of additional requirement of Within 3m below top of tank of compartment is limited to cargo oil tanks and water ballast tanks with weather deck as tank top considering the technical background about this requirement. In Table 1, specific requirement for superstructures and deckhouses is missing, therefore it is proposed to add a new category based on the relevant requirements specified in CSR-BC and CSR-OT. Because this change affects only the size of fillet welding, there is no impact on scantlings. SECTION 3 DESIGN OF WELDED JOINTS 2 TEE OR CROSS JOINT RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 12 OF 14
13 2.5 Weld size criteria (Table 2: Weld factors for different structural members) The proposal is to limit the extent of full penetration welding of the connection of the longitudinal hatch coaming plating to the deck. Weld factors are provided for various connections in Table 2. For the connection of the longitudinal hatch coaming to deck plating at corners of hatchways, full penetration welding is required, and the extent of full penetration welding is 15% of the hatch coaming length. This is not in line with the requirement of connection of hatch coaming end bracket to the deck plating, which is 15% of the hatch coaming height in Pt 1, Ch 12, Sec 3, [2.4.5] (h) and the minimum extent of full penetration welding described in Pt 1, Ch 12, Sec 3, [2.4.4] and [2.4.7] A fine mesh FEM study is carried out to analyse the stress level of such connections in consideration of all relevant EDWs. The stress plots are shown in Figure 1. The connection of the longitudinal hatch coaming to deck plating is shown in a green line, and the connection of the transverse coaming to deck is shown in a red line. The maximum utilization factors, which is represented by λ f / λ fperm, refer to Pt 1, Ch 7, Sec 3, [6.2], of elements in way of connection are about , as listed in Table 1. Figure 1. Stress plots of hatch coaming connection to deck plating Max Stress of Seagoing condition Max stress of HSM load cases Max stress of FSM load cases Max stress of BSR load cases Max stress of BSP load cases Max stress of OST load cases RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 13 OF 14
14 Max Stress of Harbour condition Table 1. Maximum utilization factors of hatch coaming connection to deck plating Location Seagoing condition Harbour condition Longitudinal hatch coaming Transverse hatch coaming According to the study, the stress levels of these connections based on 50 x 50 mm mesh size are within a reasonable range. Therefore, full penetration welding can be limited to a local area only, and 15% of hatch coaming height is proposed to be in line with the principle of full/partial penetration welding for the local peak stress area in accordance with Pt 1, Ch 12, Sec 3, [2.4.4] and [2.4.7]. In addition, Non-destructive examination (NDE) is less reliable in fillet welding compared with a full penetration welding as crack propagation from the root is difficult to detect before the crack reach the surface so the fillet welding for such a critical locations i.e hatch corner should be avoided for better quality control. The remaining part of the connection within 15% of the longitudinal hatch length should follow the general requirement of watertight plate to boundary plating with welding factor of The extent of full penetration welding will be reduced. SECTION 3 DESIGN OF WELDED JOINTS 2 TEE OR CROSS JOINT 2.5 Weld size criteria (Table 2: Weld factors for different structural members) The proposal is to clarify the requirements. The requirement has been updated to clarify that the superstructure and deck house, as well as the bulkheads of these structures, are in the same category. Scantling impact is not expected. RCP 1 TO 1 JANUARY 2018 PAGE 14 OF 14
COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR BULK CARRIERS AND OIL TANKERS RULE CHANGE PROPOSAL 1 This proposal contains amendments within the following Parts and chap
Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers Draft Rule Change Proposal 1 to 01 JAN 2018 version Notes: (1) These Rule Changes enter into force on 1 st July 2019. Copyright in these Common
More informationTechnical Background for Urgent Rule Change Notice 1 to 01 JAN 2014 version
Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers Technical Background for Urgent Rule Change Notice 1 to 01 JAN 2014 version Copyright in these Common Structural Rules is owned by each IACS Member
More informationIACS Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers, January Background Document
IACS Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers, January 2006 Background Document SECTION 9/2 DESIGN VERIFICATION STRENGTH ASSESSMENT (FEM) NOTE: - This TB is published to improve the transparency
More informationCorrigenda 1. Rule Editorials
COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR BULK CARRIERS JULY 2012 Corrigenda 1 Rule Editorials Notes: (1) These Rule Corrigenda enter into force on 1st July 2012. (2) These Rule Corrigenda should be read in conjunction
More informationImpact of Harmonized CSR for oil tanker
Impact of Harmonized CSR for oil tanker UnChul Choi Hundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd, Ulsan, Korea Abstract This paper covers the design experience for oil tankers designed by the Harmonized
More informationConsequence Assessment of Harmonized CSR
7 th ASEF in KOBE November 7 th -8 th, 2013 Consequence Assessment of Harmonized CSR FUJII, Toshihiro OSHIMA SHIPBUILDING CO., LTD. JAPAN 1 Contents 1 Summary of Consequence Assessment 2 3 4 Weight Impact
More informationPart 7 Ships of Special Service
2017 Rules for the Classification of Steel Ships Part 7 Ships of Special Service 2017 Guidance Relating to the Rules for the Classification of Steel ships Part 7 Ships of Special Service Rules Guidance
More informationRules for the Classification of. Dredgers
017 Rules for the Classification of Dredgers KR 017 Rules for the Classification of Dredgers RB-04-E KR APPLICATION OF "RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF DREDGERS" 1. Unless expressly specified otherwise,
More informationOre Carriers Part 4, Chapter 11
Section 1 Section 1 General 2 Materials and protection 3 Longitudinal strength 1.2 Structural configuration and ship arrangement 1.2.1 The requirements contained in the Chapter apply to single deck ships
More informationRULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Inland navigation vessels. Part 5 Ship types Chapter 1 Cargo vessels. Edition December 2015 DNV GL AS
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Inland navigation vessels Edition December 2015 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 1 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by ("DNV
More informationIACS Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers Complying with IMO GBS. Gang Wang, IACS HP member Busan,Korea, October 2016
TSCF 2016 Shipbuilders Meeting IACS Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers Complying with IMO GBS Gang Wang, IACS HP member Busan,Korea, 26 27 October 2016 1 Content 1 Introduction 2
More informationImpact of IACS Harmonized CSR on Tankers
Impact of IACS Harmonized CSR on Tankers Wu Jiameng (wujm_maric@sina.cn) Zheng Wenqing Liu Yinhua Gu Jun Marine Design & Research Institute of China (mcb@maric.com.cn), Shanghai, China Abstract The external
More informationPart 10 Hull Structure and Equipment of Small Steel Ships
2015 Rules for the Classification of Steel Ships Part 10 Hull Structure and Equipment of Small Steel Ships 2015 Guidance Relating to the Rules for the Classification of Steel ships Part 10 Hull Structure
More informationRule Change Notice 1 to 01 JAN 2014 version
Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers Rule Change Notice 1 to 01 JAN 2014 version Notes: (1) These Rule Changes enter into force on 1 st July 2015. Copyright in these Common Structural
More informationTHE COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES INITIAL DESIGNS AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
THE COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES INITIAL DESIGNS AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Gary Horn, ABS, USA Dan Cronin, ABS, Singapore Abstract This paper will discuss the design of oil tankers built to the IACS Common Structural
More informationWorking together for a safer world. RulesCalc 2017 Release Notes
Working together for a safer world RulesCalc 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Product information 1 3. System requirements 1 4. Training and Support information 1 5. What s new in RulesCalc 2017.0.0.4
More informationPreliminary Consequence Assessment on Harmonized CSR from Chinese Shipbuilding Industry
6 th ASEF in Guangzhou, 22-23 Nov. 2012 Preliminary Consequence Assessment on Harmonized CSR from Chinese Shipbuilding Industry Zhang Fan China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry (CANSI)
More informationPart 5 Ship types Chapter 1 Bulk carriers and dry cargo ships
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition October 2015 Amended January 2016 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 1 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by ("DNV
More informationShipRight Design and Construction
ShipRight Design and Construction Additional Design Procedures Assessment of Steel Hatch Covers Using Finite Element Analysis January 2018 Working together for a safer world Document History Document Date:
More informationDesign Development of Corrugated Bulkheads
Design Development of Corrugated Bulkheads Hayato Suga Tatsuya Hayashi Shinichiro Ishimaru Koki Hirano Tsubasa
More informationRight Additional Design Procedures
ShipRight Design and construction Additional Design Procedures Assessment of Steel Hatch Covers Using Finite Element Analysis July 2007 ABCD Lloyd s Register Marine Business Stream 71 Fenchurch Street
More informationRule Changes Notice. Number 1 to the 2010 Edition
COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR BULK CARRIERS JULY 2010 Rule Changes Notice Number 1 to the 2010 Edition Notes: (1) These Rule Changes enter into force on 1st July 2012. (2) This Rule Change Notice should
More informationMR. Tanker with Harmonized CSR
MR. Tanker with Harmonized CSR Ha-Young So hyso@hmd.co.kr Min-Kwon Bae bmk@hmd.co.kr Dug-Ki Min mdkjey@hmd.co.kr Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co., Ltd, Korea Abstract HCSR(Harmonized CSR) which came into force
More informationUse of Steel Grades for Various Hull Members - Ships of 90 m in Length and Above
(1978) (Rev.1 1980) (Rev.2 1996) (Rev.3 May 2002) Rev.4 July 2003) (Rev.5 Sept 2007) (Rev.6 May 2010) (Rev.7 Apr 2013) (Rev.8 Dec 2015) (Rev.9 July 2018) Use of Steel Grades for Various Hull Members -
More informationUse of Steel Grades for Various Hull Members - Ships of 90 m in Length and Above
(1978) (Rev.1 1980) (Rev.2 1996) (Rev.3 May 2002) Rev.4 July 2003) (Rev.5 Sept 2007) (Rev.6 May 2010) (Rev.7 Apr 2013) (Rev.8 Dec 2015) Use of Steel Grades for Various Hull Members - Ships of 90 m in Length
More informationSTEEL BARGES 1991 RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING. NOTICE NO. 8 September The following Rule Changes are EFFECTIVE AS OF 1 JANUARY 2003.
RULES FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING STEEL BARGES 1991 NOTICE NO. 8 September 2002 The following Rule Changes are EFFECTIVE AS OF 1 JANUARY 2003. SECTION 7 PART B MAIN FRAMING TANK BARGES 7B.3 Double Skin Tank
More informationDesign Development of Corrugated Bulkheads
Design Development of Corrugated Bulkheads TSCF 2010 Shipbuilders Meeting 27 October 2010 Nippon Kaiji Kyokai 1 Topics Purpose of corrugated bulkheads Structural types of corrugated bulkheads Types of
More informationGOAL-BASED NEW SHIP CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. Status reports addressing observations SUMMARY
E MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE 99th session Agenda item 6 MSC 99/INF.19 13 March 2018 ENGLISH ONLY GOAL-BASED NEW SHIP CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Status reports addressing observations Submitted by IACS SUMMARY
More informationFurther impact on Bulker design by the current draft of CSR-H
Further impact on Bulker design by the current draft of CSR-H SHIBASAKI, Kohta Japan Marine United Corp. The Shipbuilders Association of Japan The 8 th ASEF in Jeju, 27-28 Nov. 2014 Current situation of
More informationShipRight Notice for. Linked Supporting Services Anti-Corrosion System Notation, July Issue date: September 2014
ShipRight Notice for Linked Supporting Services Anti-Corrosion System Notation, July 2012 The status of this Rule set is amended as shown and is now to be read in conjunction with this and prior Notices.
More informationRULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS
RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS 2013 Part 2 - HULL Amendments No. 1 CROATIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING Hrvatska (Croatia) 21000 Split Marasovićeva 67 P.O.B. 187 Tel.: (...) 385 (0)21 40 81 11 Fax.: (...)
More informationGUIDANCE FOR CHECKING THE STRUCTURE OF BULK CARRIERS
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR Telephone: 020 7735 7611 Fax: 020 7587 3210 IMO E Ref. T1/2.01 MSC/Circ.1117 24 June 2004 GUIDANCE FOR CHECKING THE STRUCTURE OF BULK
More informationPart 3 Hull Structures
2014 Rules for the Classification of Steel Ships Part 3 Hull Structures 2014 Guidance Relating to the Rules for the Classification of Steel ships Part 3 Hull Structures Rules Guidance 2014 Rules for the
More informationRules for the Classification of. Steel Barges
2017 Rules for the Classification of Steel Barges KR 2017 Rules for the Classification of Steel Barges Rules 2017 Guidance Relating to the Rules for the Classification of Steel Barges Guidance 2017 Rules
More informationCOMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR DOUBLE HULL OIL TANKERS WITH LENGTH 150 METRES AND ABOVE
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IACS COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES PART 8 CHAPTER 1 COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR DOUBLE HULL OIL TANKERS WITH LENGTH 150 METRES AND ABOVE JANUARY 008 This booklet includes the
More informationShipRight Notice 1 Design and Construction
ShipRight Notice 1 Design and Construction Structural Design Assessment Primary Hull and Cargo Tank Structure of Type A Liquefied Gas Carriers, January 2017 The status of this Rule set is amended as shown
More informationDesign of Catamaran Ship Main Deck and Bulkhead to Withstand the Crane Load
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development e-issn: 78-067X, p-issn: 78-800X, www.ijerd.com Volume 8, Issue 3 (August 013), PP. 31-41 Design of Catamaran Ship Main Deck and Bulkhead to
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN A SHIP CONSTRUCTION FILE
E 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR Telephone: +44 (0)20 7735 7611 Fax: +44 (0)20 7587 3210 Ref. T4/3.01 MSC.1/Circ.1343 2 June 2010 GUIDELINES FOR THE INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN A SHIP CONSTRUCTION
More informationIMO ANY OTHER BUSINESS. Verification of technical standards for ship construction. Submitted by the United Kingdom
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION E IMO SUB-COMMITTEE ON SHIP DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT 48th session Agenda item 24 DE 48/INF.6 17 December 2004 ENGLISH ONLY ANY OTHER BUSINESS Verification of technical standards
More informationThis paragraph should be modified as below for clarification. It is not suitable
IACS Common Structural Rules Knowledge Cre Tanker Q&As and CIs on the IACS CSR Knowledge Cre 4 6/2.1.1.7 anodes 2006/3/5 Where anodes are fitted in ballast tank are to be submitted for approval The requirem
More informationStrength analysis of hull structure in liquefied gas carriers with membrane tanks
CLASSIFICATION NOTES No. 31.9 Strength analysis of hull structure in liquefied gas carriers with membrane tanks JULY 2016 The electronic pdf version of this document found through http://www.dnvgl.com
More informationRULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SEA-GOING STEEL SHIPS
CCS Rule Change Notice For: RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SEA-GOING STEEL SHIPS Version: RCN No.1, July, 2017 Effective from 01/07/2017 Beijing CHINA CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY CCS Rule Change Notice For: RULES
More informationFatigue strength of knuckle joints - a key parameter in ship design D. Beghin Marine Division, Bureau Veritas, Paris, France
Fatigue strength of knuckle joints - a key parameter in ship design D. Beghin Marine Division, Bureau Veritas, Paris, France Abstract Structural integrity of knuckle joints in inner hull for double hull
More informationShipRight Design and Construction
ShipRight Design and Construction Structural Design Assessment Procedure for Primary Structure of Ore Carriers September 2016 Working together for a safer world Lloyd's Register Group Limited 2016. All
More informationPART II. HULL 1. DESIGN PRINCIPLES
1.1 GENERAL 1.1.1 Application. 1.1.1.1 Unless provided otherwise, requirements of the present Part of the Rules apply to steel ships of welded construction, from 12 to 350 m in length whose proportions
More informationStrength analysis of hull structure in container ships
CLASS GUIDELINE DNVGL-CG-0131 Edition October 2015 Amended February 2015 Strength analysis of hull structure in container ships The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from
More informationHull Surveys for Liquefied Gas Carriers
(May 2007) (Rev.1 Nov 2007) (Rev.2 Mar 2009) (Rev.3 July 2011) Hull Surveys for Liquefied Gas Carriers CONTENTS 1. General 1.1 Application 1.2 Definitions 1.3 Repairs 1.4 Thickness measurements and close-up
More informationPart 3 Hull Structures
2017 Rules for the Classification of Steel Ships Part 3 Hull Structures 2017 Guidance Relating to the Rules for the Classification of Steel ships Part 3 Hull Structures Rules Guidance 2017 Rules for the
More informationShipRight Design and Construction
ShipRight Design and Construction Structural Design Assessment Procedure for Membrane Tank LNG Ships September 2016 Working together for a safer world Document History Date: May 2000 November 2001 July
More informationCargo Tank/Local fine mesh FE Analysis Procedure in way of opening
CI-T 3 (Mar. 2008) Cargo Tank/Local fine mesh FE Analysis Procedure in way of opening Rule Section Table 9.2.1 Maximum Permissible Stresses Table 9.2.2 Maximum Permissible Utilisation Factor Against Buckling
More informationCommon Structural Rules for. Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers
Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers EXTERNAL RELEASE 1 APRIL 2013 COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR BULK CARRIERS AND OIL TANKERS TECHNICAL BACKGROUND RULE REFERENCE This document is an
More informationHull damage experience in CSR tankers
MARITIME Hull damage experience in CSR tankers TSCF SBM, Busan October 2016 Ivar Håberg Senior Principle Surveyor, DNV GL SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER Using data to identify improvement opportunities for the
More informationInformation Paper on Cargo Tank Corrugated Bulkhead Damages of Double Hull Tankers
Tanker Structure Co-operative Forum Information Paper on Cargo Tank Corrugated Bulkhead Damages of Double Hull Tankers SUMMARY The paper reviews current corrugated bulkhead design practise and provides
More informationThe Assessment of CSR Regulations Implementation on the Midship Strength and Structural Weight of DWT Bulk Carrier
The Assessment of CSR Regulations Implementation on the Midship Strength and Structural Weight of 77.500 DWT Bulk Carrier Ahmad Fauzan Zakki Abstract Since April 1 st 2006, all of the ships that built
More informationPART 4 STEEL AND ALUMINIUM CONSTRUCTION
PART 4 STEEL AND ALUMINIUM CONSTRUCTION PART 4 STEEL AND ALUMINIUM CONSTRUCTION SECTION SUBJECT 4.1 Materials 4.2 Steel and aluminium hull construction 4.3 Keel, centre and side girders 4.4 Bottom construction
More informationCSA - Direct Analysis of Ship Structures
CLASSIFICATION NOTES No. 34.1 CSA - Direct Analysis of Ship Structures JANUARY 2013 The electronic pdf version of this document found through http://www.dnv.com is the officially binding version The content
More informationShipRight ABCD. Structural Design Assessment. Primary Structure of Membrane Tank LNG Ships Guidance on Direct Assessment.
ShipRight Design and construction Structural Design Assessment Primary Structure of Membrane Tank LNG Ships Guidance on Direct Assessment October 2013 ABCD ShipRight Design and construction Structural
More informationSURVEY PROGRAMME for Bulk Carriers other than Double Skin Bulk Carriers
Survey Programme for BC (SH) (ver. 2016.07) SURVEY PROGRAMME for Bulk Carriers other than Double Skin Bulk Carriers Basic Information and Particulars Name of Ship : IMO Number : Flag State : Port of Registry
More informationSURVEY PROGRAMME for Bulk Carriers other than Double Skin Bulk Carriers
Survey Programme for BC (SH) (ver. 2019.01) SURVEY PROGRAMME for Bulk Carriers other than Double Skin Bulk Carriers Basic Information and Particulars Name of Ship : IMO Number : Flag State : Port of Registry
More informationDevelopment of HighCRest Software for Ship Structure Verifications under CSR-H Requirements
TEAM 2014, Oct. 13-16, 2014, Istanbul, Turkey Development of HighCRest Software for Ship Structure Verifications under CSR-H Requirements Chi-Fang Lee*, Tin-Jung Chen, Yann Quéméner, Kuan-Chen Chen, Chien-Hua
More informationFATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF SHIP STRUCTURES * * *
No.56 No.56 (July 1999) FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF SHIP STRUCTURES * * * Recom. 56.1 IACS Rec. 1999 FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF SHIP STRUCTURES ************ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL 2. DETERMINATION OF THE LONG
More informationRULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 8 Buckling. Edition October 2015 DNV GL AS
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition October 2015 Part 3 Hull Chapter 8 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that
More informationPart 3 Hull Chapter 3 Structural design principles
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition January 2017 Part 3 Hull Chapter 3 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that
More informationReference table of the clarification of the applicability of SOLAS regulations
(Nov 2008) (Rev.1 Dec 2012) IACS Unified s (UI) for on the application of SOLAS regulations to conversions of Single-Hull Oil Tankers to Double-Hull Oil Tankers or Bulk Carriers Single Hull Tanker to Double
More informationRULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 8 Buckling. Edition January 2017 DNV GL AS
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition January 2017 Part 3 Hull Chapter 8 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that
More informationAllowable thickness diminution for hull structure
CLASS GUIDELINE DNVGL-CG-0182 Edition February 2016 Allowable thickness diminution for hull structure The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com, is
More informationRules for Classification and Construction Analysis Techniques
V Rules for Classification and Construction Analysis Techniques 1 Hull Structural Design Analyses 4 Guidelines for of Multipurpose Vessels Edition 2013 The following Guidelines come into force on 1 May
More informationAllowable Thickness Diminution for Hull Structure
CLASSIFICATION NOTES No. 72.1 Allowable Thickness Diminution for Hull Structure JULY 2013 The electronic pdf version of this document found through http://www.dnv.com is the officially binding version
More informationRULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 5 Ship types Chapter 3 RO/RO Ships. Edition January 2016 DNV GL AS
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition January 2016 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 3 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by ("DNV GL"). The user accepts
More informationRESOLUTION MSC.158(78) (adopted on 20 May 2004) AMENDMENTS TO THE TECHNICAL PROVISIONS FOR MEANS OF ACCESS FOR INSPECTIONS
RESOLUTION MSC.158(78) MSC.lS8(78) (adopted on 20 May 2004) AMENDMENTS TO THE TECHNICAL PROVISIONS FOR MEANS OF ACCESS FOR INSPECTIONS THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE, RECALLING Article 28(b) of the Convention
More informationPART 4 STEEL CONSTRUCTION
PART 4 STEEL CONSTRUCTION SECTION SUBJECT 4.1 Materials 4.2 Steel hull construction 4.3 Keel, centre and side girders 4.4 Bottom construction floors and longitudinals 4.5 Integral tanks 4.6 Stem 4.7 Bulbous
More informationSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF DWT SULPHUR BITUMEN TANKER
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF 11000 DWT SULPHUR BITUMEN TANKER Yaşar GÜL, Levent KAYDIHAN, Osman BEDEL DELTA MARINE Engineering Co. y.gul@deltamarine.com.tr, l.kaydihan@deltamarine.com.tr, o.bedel@deltamarine.com.tr
More informationZ10.2 Z10.2. Hull Surveys of Bulk Carriers
1992 (Rev.1 1994) (Rev.2 1994) (Rev.3 1995) (Rev.4 1996) (Rev.5 1996) (Rev.6 1996) (Rev.7 1997) (Rev.8 April 1998) (Rev.9 July 1999) (Rev.10 Sept. 2000) (Rev.10.1 Sept. 2000) (Rev.11 Nov. 2000) (Rev.11.1
More informationTechnical Information
Subject Format Revision of Condition Evaluation Report (CER) To whom it may concern Technical Information No. TEC-1092 Date 17 November 2016 When Special is carried out for ships applying Enhanced Program(ESP),
More information1.15 Chemical Tanker Longitudinal corrugated bulkhead (vertical type).
Table A.1 corrugated bulkhead s Case Ship Type Damage Location 1.1 Chemical Tanker Longitudinal corrugated bulkheads (horizontal type) in way of mid cargo area. 1.2 Product Tanker Transverse corrugated
More informationHULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN, STEEL
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF HIGH SPEED, LIGHT CRAFT AND NAVAL SURFACE CRAFT STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT PART 3 CHAPTER 2 HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN, STEEL JULY 1999 CONTENTS PAGE Sec. 1 Structural Principles...
More informationEnhanced Survey Programme (ESP) For CHEMICAL TANKERS. Preparation for Special Survey (Planning Document)
Enhanced Survey Programme (ESP) For CHEMICAL TANKERS Preparation for Special Survey (Planning Document) Revision 9.1 (July 2005) Lloyd s Register EMEA is a part of Lloyd s Register. Lloyd s Register EMEA
More informationEnhanced Survey Programme (ESP) For BULK CARRIERS. Preparation for Special Survey (Planning Document)
Enhanced Survey Programme (ESP) For BULK CARRIERS Preparation for Special Survey (Planning Document) Revision 9.1 (July 2005) Lloyd s Register EMEA is a part of Lloyd s Register. Lloyd s Register EMEA
More informationEnhanced Survey Programme (ESP) For CHEMICAL TANKERS. Preparation for Special Survey (Planning Document)
Enhanced Survey Programme (ESP) For CHEMICAL TANKERS Preparation for Special Survey (Planning Document) Revision 9.2 (July 2006) Lloyd s Register EMEA is a part of Lloyd s Register. Lloyd s Register EMEA
More informationHull Structural Design, Steel
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF High Speed, Light Craft and Naval Surface Craft PART 3 CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT Hull Structural Design, Steel JULY 2012 The electronic pdf version of this document found
More informationStructural Design of a Containership Approximately 3100 TEU According to the Concept of General Ship Design B-178
Structural Design of a Containership Approximately 3100 TEU According to the Concept of General Ship Design B-178 W.Souadji, Zbigniew Sekulski, B.Hamoudi 1 Abstract The design developed in this work is
More informationLiquefied gas carriers with independent prismatic tanks of type A and B
CLASS GUIDELINE DNVGL-CG-0133 Edition October 2015 Liquefied gas carriers with independent prismatic tanks of type A and B The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com,
More informationRULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SEA-GOING STEEL SHIPS
CCS Rule Change Notice For: RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SEA-GOING STEEL SHIPS Version: Septemer 2018. RCN No.2 Effective date: 1 October 2018 Beijing CHINA CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY CCS Rule Change Notice
More informationSafety of bulk carriers - prime concern of the maritime community
Safety of bulk carriers - prime concern of the maritime community D. Beghin Bureau Veritas, Paris, France ABSTRACT Further to the severe damages which occurred in the recent years on bulk carriers, the
More informationPart 3 Hull Chapter 3 Structural design principles
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition October 2015 Part 3 Hull Chapter 3 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that
More informationIMO AMENDMENTS TO RESOLUTION A.744(18) Report of the Working Group
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION E IMO SUB-COMMITTEE ON SHIP DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT 50th session Agenda item 3 DE 50/WP.1 8 March 2007 Original: ENGLISH AMENDMENTS TO RESOLUTION A.744(18) Report of the
More informationHULL - INTERNAL MEMBERS & SUBDIVISIONS
VOLUME II Copyright 2013 Overseas Marine Certification Services OMCS CLASS INDEX VOLUME II: PART A: HULL CHAPTER 1: TERMS 1.1. LENGTH 1 1.2. BREADTH 1 1.3. DEPTH 1 1.4. DRAUGHT 1 1.5. FREEBOARD DECK. 1
More informationHULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN, STEEL
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF HIGH SPEED, LIGHT CRAFT AND NAVAL SURFACE CRAFT STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT PART 3 CHAPTER 2 HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN, STEEL JANUARY 2011 CONTENTS PAGE Sec. 1 Structural Principles...
More informationTripping bracket:no requirement is given for the thickness of tripping bracket when its edge is stiffened.
Tanker Q&As and CIs on the IACS CSR Knowledge Cre 98 10/2.4.2.3 PSM 2006/10/5 Other StructureIt is understood that small intermediate brackets, i.e. docking bracket, bilge bracket which are not PSMs may
More informationIMO GBS and IACS Harmonised Common Structural Rules
IMO GBS and IACS Harmonised Common Structural Rules TSCF Shipbuilder Meeting 24 25 October 2013 Philippe Baumans, IACS Project Management Team BV Director of Development Department IMO GBS AND IACS HARMONISED
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES BULK CARRIERS
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES BULK CARRIERS Guidance and Information on Bulk Cargo Loading and Discharging to Reduce the Likelihood of Over-stressing the Hull Structure Rev.1 July
More informationRules for Classification and Construction Analysis Techniques
V Rules for Classification and Construction Analysis Techniques 1 Hull Structural Design Analyses 1 Guidelines for Global Strength Analysis of Container Ships Edition 2011 The following Guidelines come
More informationASSESSMENT PROCEDURE WITH TODAY S LATEST CALCULATION TOOLS OF MODERN AND EXISTING DESIGNS OF LARGE LPG TANKERS.
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE WITH TODA S LATEST CALCULATION TOOLS OF MODERN AND EISTING DESIGNS OF LARGE LPG TANKERS. Bruno Dabouis, Product Manager Tankers Philippe Cambos, Head of Tanker Structure Department,
More informationRight Structural Design Assessment
ShipRight Design and construction Structural Design Assessment Primary Structure of Type B Spherical Tank LNG Ships Guidance on direct calculations May 2004 ABCD Lloyd s Register Marine Business Stream
More informationIACS Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers, January Background Document
IACS Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers, January 006 Background Document SECTION 10 BUCKLING AND ULTIMATE STRENGTH NOTE: - This TB is published to improve the transparency of CSRs and
More information