Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Rule ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT PREFACE
|
|
- Kevin Austin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Rule ANNUAL GROUNDWATER Report Requirements PREFACE This report documents the status of the groundwater monitoring and corrective action program in place under the federal Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule. Containing data for the previous calendar year, it must be placed in the facility operating record by January 31 and posted publicly by March 2. It summarizes key actions completed, describes any challenges and how they were addressed, and projects key activities for the upcoming year. It must include a map or diagram depicting the CCR unit and all the wells in the monitoring network, identifying any that were decommissioned or installed in the previous year. In addition, it contains the monitoring data summary, a narrative discussing any transitions between detection monitoring and assessment monitoring and the reasons for those transitions. What the Report Is This report describes the first step in a phased, prescriptive process for monitoring groundwater near CCR storage facilities. It is a snap shot in time, showing how the data obtained during the report year compare to all the background data that have been obtained to date, and whether further monitoring for additional substances should be performed based on that comparison. What the Report Is Not The report does not make any determinations regarding potential environmental impact to or contamination of groundwater, and neither the raw data nor the initial statistical analysis should be independently or collectively interpreted in that way. Report Methodology Data comparison is done through a test to determine if monitoring results from wells adjacent to the CCR facility are statistically higher than background levels for that site. Therefore, as the data set increases over time, so does the confidence that any one result represents a statistically significant increase (SSI) over the background data. Groundwater moves slowly and both natural and man-made sources can impact groundwater. Therefore, the federal rule uses a phased approach with data verification steps in between. In this initial annual report, if a data result yields an SSI, the groundwater monitoring effort transitions from the detection program (measuring substances that move most rapidly in groundwater to identify a potential impact) to the assessment program (measuring substances that are of more concern including several that have regulatory standards).
2 MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL COMBUSTION BYPRODUCT LANDFILL Hatfield s Ferry Power Station Greene County, Pennsylvania Prepared for: FirstEnergy 8 Cabin Hill Drive Greensburg, PA 1561 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. 4 Penn Center Boulevard, Suite 2 Pittsburgh, PA Phone: (412) Fax: (412) Tetra Tech Project No. 212C-SW-71
3 MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL COMBUSTION BYPRODUCT LANDFILL HATFIELD S FERRY POWER STATION GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Prepared for: FirstEnergy 8 Cabin Hill Drive Greensburg, PA 1561 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. 4 Penn Center Boulevard, Suite 2 Pittsburgh, PA Phone: (412) Fax: (412) Tetra Tech Project No. 212C-SW-71
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Background and Site Characteristics Regulatory Basis Overview of Report Contents GENERAL INFORMATION Status Of The Groundwater Monitoring And Corrective Action Program Establishing a CCR Groundwater Monitoring Well System Development of a Groundwater Monitoring Plan Completion of Background Groundwater Sampling Selection of Statistical Methods Initial Detection Monitoring Sampling Event Problems Encountered/Resolved Transition Between Monitoring Programs (If Any) Key Activities Planned For The Upcoming Year DETECTION MONITORING INFORMATION Groundwater Analytical Results Summary TABLES FIGURES 212C-SW-71 iii
5 TABLES 2-1 CCR Rule Groundwater Monitoring System Well Summary 3-1 CCR Rule Groundwater Monitoring Analytical Results Summary FIGURES 2-1 CCR Rule Groundwater Monitoring System 212C-SW-71 iv
6 1. INTRODUCTION This 217 Annual Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report was prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) on behalf of FirstEnergy (FE), for the Coal Combustion Byproduct Landfill (CCBL or CCR unit ) at the Hatfield s Ferry Power Station (hereinafter referred to as the Station ). The Station is located in Greene County, Pennsylvania. The report was developed to comply with requirements of 4 CFR 257.9(e). 1.1 BACKGROUND AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS CCRs produced at the Station were placed in the facility s captive CCBL, which is located approximately one mile west-southwest of the Station. The landfill is an existing CCR unit that is regulated under Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Solid Waste Permit No A PADEP groundwater monitoring program for the landfill has been in effect since Although CCR waste generation ceased when the Station closed in 213, a September 215 modification to the permit also allowed coal combustion wastes generated at other FirstEnergy facilities to be disposed at the Hatfield CCBL. However, no disposal from any other facilities has occurred to date. The original topography of the CCBL area has been altered by surface mining of coal that was performed during the 197s and 198s throughout much of the central portion of the site. Mine spoil, in some cases mixed with fly ash, was used as backfill for mined areas. The CCBL consists of three permitted disposal areas: Phase I (approximately acres), Phase II (approximately 2 acres), and Phase III (approximately 17 acres at full build-out). The Phase I and II areas are unlined but do include an underdrain blanket system and are largely overlain by the Phase III area, which has a Pennsylvania Class I Residual Solid Waste liner system that includes two geomembranes, a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL), a leachate collection system, and a leak detection zone. Disposal operations were performed in the Phase I and II areas until 21, at which time all operations were transitioned to the Phase III area. Between 29 and 213, the Phase III area was constructed in stages (referred to as Steps ): Steps 1, 2, and 3-1, which have a combined lined area of approximately 58 acres. Underdrain flows collected from the Phase I and II areas are routed to two concrete sumps where they are then pumped to a passive wetland treatment system located northeast of the Phase II disposal area. Surface water runoff and leachate collected from the Phase III area are routed to the landfill s Leachate Storage Impoundment (LSI), which is located east of the Phase II and Phase III disposal areas. Like the Phase III area, the LSI has a Class I liner system. 212C-SW
7 Groundwater in the CCBL area occurs primarily within the mine spoil and underlying fractured bedrock and flow is primarily controlled by topography and by the bedrock structure (i.e., dip). The uppermost aquifer in the CCBL area is the mine spoil/weathered bedrock aquifer (shallow aquifer) but some of the shallow groundwater also migrates to the underlying Uniontown sandstone aquifer. Within the footprint of the CCBL the mine spoil/weathered bedrock and Uniontown sandstone form a single interconnected flow unit, as the shallow mine spoil/weathered bedrock groundwater discharges/infiltrates directly into the Uniontown sandstone north of the outcrop of the Waynesburg coal. The Uniontown sandstone is directly underlain by a shale layer that serves as an aquitard to further vertical groundwater flow downward into other aquifers at the site. The mine spoil/weathered bedrock unit has been identified as the uppermost aquifer for CCR Rule groundwater monitoring under most of the CCBL area, with the underlying Uniontown sandstone considered the uppermost aquifer in those CCBL areas located north of the outcrop of the Waynesburg coal. Historic and recent groundwater level data indicate groundwater flow within the mine spoil/weathered bedrock aquifer is primarily to the north along the slope of the top of bedrock. A portion of the shallow groundwater in the eastern portion of the CCBL (northeast of the waste boundary) also flows eastward. Groundwater in the Uniontown sandstone aquifer migrates primarily to the northeast and east towards outcrop areas along major drainage features in the area. The historic and recent groundwater data also indicates that the groundwater flow patterns at the site exhibit very little seasonal and temporal fluctuations. A representative set of water level data from the current reporting period (217) were used for contouring groundwater flow patterns at the site as shown on Figure 2-1. A more detailed discussion of the site s geologic and hydrogeologic characteristics is provided in Section 2. of this report. 1.2 REGULATORY BASIS As required by 257.9(e), of the CCR Rule, Owners or Operators of existing CCR landfills and surface impoundments must prepare an Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report no later than January 31, 218 and annually thereafter. According to the subject section, For the preceding calendar year, the annual report must document the status of the groundwater monitoring and corrective action program for the CCR unit, summarize key actions completed, describe any problems encountered, discuss actions to resolve the problems, and project key activities for the upcoming year. 212C-SW
8 This report has been developed to meet the general requirements above and the specific requirements of 257.9(e)(1) through (5), which include: (1) A map, aerial image, or diagram showing the CCR unit and all background (or upgradient) and downgradient monitoring wells, to include the well identification numbers, that are part of the groundwater monitoring program for the CCR unit (see Figure 2-1); (2) Identification of any monitoring wells that were installed or decommissioned during the preceding year, along with a narrative description of why those actions were taken (see Section 2.1.1); (3) In addition to all the monitoring data obtained under through , a summary including the number of groundwater samples that were collected for analysis for each background and downgradient well, the dates the samples were collected, and whether the sample was required by the Detection Monitoring or Assessment Monitoring programs (see Sections and and Table 3-1); (4) A narrative discussion of any transition between monitoring programs (e.g., the date and circumstances for transitioning from Detection Monitoring to Assessment Monitoring in addition to identifying the constituent(s) detected at a statistically significant increase over background levels) (see Section 2.3); and (5) Other information required to be included in the annual report as specified in through In addition, the Owner and Operator must place the report in the facility's operating record as required by (h)(1), provide notification of the report s availability to the appropriate State Director within 3 days of placement in operating record as required by (h)(1), and place the report on the facility s publically accessible website, also within 3 days of placing the report in the operating record. 1.3 OVERVIEW OF REPORT CONTENTS Section 1. of this report provided an overview of the CCR unit characteristics, regulatory basis, and a summary of the requirements for CCR Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective 212C-SW
9 Action Reports. Section 2. summarizes the status of key actions pertaining to CCR groundwater monitoring completed during 217 for the CCBL and plans for the upcoming year. Section 3. presents Detection Monitoring results from groundwater sampling events completed in C-SW
10 2. GENERAL INFORMATION This section provides an overview of the status of the CCR groundwater monitoring program through 217 and key activities planned for STATUS OF THE GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM During calendar years 216 and 217, the following key actions were completed with regard to the CCR groundwater monitoring program for the CCBL Establishing a CCR Groundwater Monitoring Well System Tetra Tech was contracted by FirstEnergy to review existing groundwater monitoring system information and site hydrogeologic data for the CCBL to evaluate the suitability of the existing system, determine whether additional monitoring wells were needed, and to install and develop any new wells to establish a system that meets the applicable requirements and performance standards for groundwater monitoring under 4 CFR Upon completing this review, one additional groundwater monitoring well and one piezometer were installed in October of 216 to fill data gaps and to develop a network in compliance with CCR Rule requirements. The CCR monitoring well network consists of three upgradient (background) wells in the mine spoil/bedrock aquifer (MW-212A, -213A, and -215A), three upgradient (background) wells in the Uniontown sandstone aquifer (MW-212B, -213B, and - 215B), five downgradient wells to monitor the combined aquifer (MW-216A, -22A, -22B, -23B, and -24B), and one piezometer (PZ-221A), as summarized in attached Table 2-1 and shown on attached Figure 2-1. The piezometer will be used to evaluate groundwater flow patterns near the northwestern edge of the CCR unit, with provision to convert it to a CCR monitoring well if water level data indicates a flow component in the CCR uppermost aquifer from the CCR unit to the northwest. A CCR Groundwater Monitoring System Evaluation Report (Tetra Tech, Inc., October, 217), which discusses the basis for development of the monitoring well network and includes detailed information on the site geology, hydrogeology, and well completion records, was placed in the facility s Operating Record. As required by (f), the CCR groundwater monitoring well network was certified by a Professional Engineer to be in compliance with the applicable requirements of The subject certification was placed in both the facility s Operating Record and on the publically accessible website ( on October 17, C-SW
11 2.1.2 Development of a Groundwater Monitoring Plan On behalf of FE, Tetra Tech prepared a Groundwater Monitoring Plan to comply with applicable requirements of the CCR Rule. The document provides the sampling and analytical methodologies and procedures for collecting and reporting representative groundwater quality data from CCR monitoring wells at the CCBL. As required by (a), the document provides procedures and techniques for the following: Sample collection; Sample preservation and shipment; Analytical procedures; Chain-of-custody control; and Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC). In addition, the document includes the statistical plan describing the process for evaluating groundwater monitoring data developed from the CCR sampling and analysis program [ (f)] Completion of Background Groundwater Sampling To fulfill the applicable requirements of (b), eight independent rounds of background groundwater samples for analyzing all Appendix III and IV parameters from each of the CCR monitoring wells were collected prior to October 17, 217. The sampling events were conducted on the following dates: Sampling Event Dates 1 1/23 to 1/26/17 2 2/2 to 2/21/17 3 3/27 to 3/28/17 4 4/25 to 4/26/17 5 5/23 to 5/24/17 6 6/2 to 6/21/17 7 7/24 to 7/31/17 8 8/22 to 8/24/ Selection of Statistical Methods Based on the attributes of the data set from the eight rounds of background sampling, statistical methods were selected among the available methods referenced in (f) which met the performance standards referenced in (g). Data from the first eight rounds of groundwater 212C-SW
12 analytical results collected at the upgradient and downgradient CCR network wells at the site were evaluated in terms of percent non-detects and data distributions to select the appropriate statistical method for each parameter to identify any Statistically Significant Increases (SSIs) over background concentrations [ (h)]. As required by (f)(6), the statistical method selection was certified by a Professional Engineer as currently appropriate for evaluating the groundwater monitoring data for the CCBL at the Hatfield s Ferry Power Station and as meeting the applicable requirements of (f). The subject certification was placed in both the facility s Operating Record and on the publically accessible website on October 17, Initial Detection Monitoring Sampling Event In accordance with , FirstEnergy collected the first round of Detection Monitoring samples from the upgradient and downgradient CCR groundwater monitoring wells on October 12 and 13, 217 as summarized in the table below. The samples were analyzed for Appendix III parameters, with the laboratory analyses completed by October 25, 217. The laboratory results are discussed in Section 3. of this report. Monitoring Well Location Date Sampled Purpose MW-212A Upgradient/Background - 1/13/17 Detection Monitoring MW-213A Mine Spoil/Bedrock 1/12/17 Detection Monitoring MW-215A 1/13/17 Detection Monitoring MW-212B Upgradient/Background - Uniontown Sandstone 1/12/17 Not Sampled Insufficient Water MW-213B 1/12/17 Not Sampled Insufficient Water MW-215B 1/13/17 Detection Monitoring MW-216A Downgradient 1/12/17 Detection Monitoring MW-22A Mine Spoil/Bedrock 1/12/17 Detection Monitoring MW-22B Downgradient 1/12/17 Detection Monitoring MW-23B Uniontown Sandstone 1/12/17 Detection Monitoring MW-24B 1/12/17 Detection Monitoring 2.2 PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED/RESOLVED During the eight background sampling events and the initial Detection Monitoring sampling event, insufficient recoverable volumes of groundwater from two of the pre-existing upgradient wells (MW-212B and -213B) was found to consistently be problematic. These wells have been part of 212C-SW
13 the PADEP groundwater monitoring program for several years and have been able to yield sufficient water even though they have historically exhibited low to moderate standing water column depths (typically between two and five feet). It s believed that the sampling frequency (approximately every four to six weeks) required to obtain the eight background and initial Detection Monitoring samples in time to meet the CCR groundwater compliance milestone date of October 17, 217 may have overstressed these particular wells. It s also believed that one or both of these wells may still be viable for use in the site s CCR groundwater monitoring system as the required sampling frequency under the CCR Rule (semi-annual) is now in effect. As such, and since the remaining CCR monitoring system still exceeds the minimum required number of upgradient wells, the water levels in MW-212B and -213B will be monitored on a quarterly basis during 218. This additional water level data will be used to determine the viability of using one or both of the wells as part of the site s CCR groundwater monitoring system and, if necessary, help establish the basis for preparing a demonstration - in accordance with (d) - that they must be sampled at a frequency between six months and one year in order to have recoverable groundwater volumes available. If such a demonstration needs to be prepared it will be placed in the landfill s operating record when complete, and included as part of the 218 CCR Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report. Other than the available groundwater sampling volumes for upgradient wells MW-212B and -213B noted above, there were no other significant problems (e.g., quality control issues) encountered during 217 with regard to the CCR groundwater monitoring program. 2.3 TRANSITION BETWEEN MONITORING PROGRAMS (IF ANY) During 216 and 217, the eight rounds of background sampling for all Appendix III and IV parameters were conducted followed by initiation of Detection Monitoring with collection of the first Detection Monitoring samples in October of 217. There was no transition between monitoring programs (e.g., Detection to Assessment Monitoring) during KEY ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR The following are the key CCR groundwater compliance activities planned for 218: Complete the statistical evaluation of the initial round of Detection Monitoring data to determine if there are any Appendix III parameter concentrations in downgradient wells exhibiting SSIs above background. If there are no SSIs, then continue with Detection Monitoring by conducting two semiannual rounds of sampling and analysis for Appendix III constituents [per (c)]. 212C-SW
14 If any SSIs are identified, then potentially conduct an Alternate Source Determination (ASD) [per (e)(2)] to determine if a source other than the CCR unit may be causing the SSIs. If any SSI s are identified and an ASD indicates that an alternate source is not responsible for all the SSI s identified, then initiate Assessment Monitoring for Appendix IV constituents [per (e)(1)]. Obtain quarterly water levels in MW-212B and -213B to determine if one or both of the wells are viable for use in the CCR groundwater monitoring system and if they will require a sampling frequency of between six months and one year. Should it be determined that a demonstration for a modified sampling frequency is needed, it will be prepared in accordance with (d). 212C-SW
15 3. DETECTION MONITORING INFORMATION 3.1 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY As referenced above, the CCR groundwater sampling and analysis program implemented through the end of 217 consists of the eight background sampling rounds conducted between January and August 217 for all Appendix III and IV parameters, and the initial Detection Monitoring round of sampling conducted in October 217 for all Appendix III parameters. Table 3-1 presents the analytical results for these events. As previously noted, statistical evaluation of the Appendix III Detection Monitoring data in Table 3-1 remains in-progress as of the end of the 217 reporting period (lab results were received in the fourth quarter of 217 and a 9 day period is allowed by the CCR Rule for statistical evaluation which falls in the first quarter of 218). If any Appendix III SSIs are identified, ASD or Assessment Monitoring activities will be undertaken as appropriate, and associated recordkeeping, notification, and reporting will be performed in accordance with the applicable requirements of 4 CFR , 95, 15, 16, and C-SW
16 TABLES
17 TABLE 2-1 CCR RULE GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM WELL SUMMARY HATFIELD S FERRY CCB LANDFILL 217 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER Well Year Installed Formation Monitored Ground Surface Elevation (ft MSL) Total Well Depth (ft bgs) Monitored Interval (ft bgs) Monitored Interval (ft MSL) Casing ID and Material Upgradient (Background) MW-212A 25 MW-213A 25 MW-215A 25 Mine Spoil/ Weathered Bedrock Mine Spoil/ Weathered Bedrock Mine Spoil/ Weathered Bedrock " - Sch. 4 PVC " - Sch. 4 PVC " - Sch. 4 PVC MW-212B 25 Uniontown SS " - Sch. 4 PVC MW-213B 25 Uniontown SS " - Sch. 4 PVC MW-215B 25 Uniontown SS " - Sch. 4 PVC Downgradient MW-216A 25 MW-22A 216 Mine Spoil/ Weathered Bedrock Mine Spoil/ Weathered Bedrock " - Sch. 4 PVC " - Sch. 4 PVC MW-22B 1993 Uniontown SS " - Sch. 4 PVC MW-23B 1993 Uniontown SS " - Sch. 4 PVC MW-24B 1993 Uniontown SS " - Sch. 4 PVC Piezometer PZ-221A 216 Mine Spoil/ Weathered Bedrock " - Sch. 4 PVC Notes: SS = sandstone MSL = mean sea level bgs = below ground surface ID = inside diameter PVC = polyvinyl chloride
18 TABLE 3-1 CCR RULE GROUNDWATER MONITORING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY HATFIELD'S FERRY CCB LANDFILL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER SAMPLING EVENT NO. 2 WELL ID3 SAMPLE DATE BORON METALS MG/L APPENDIX III (all Chemical Constituents sampled as TOTAL RECOVERABLE) 1 APPENDIX IV (all Chemical Constituents sampled as TOTAL RECOVERABLE) 1 CALCIUM CHLORIDE FLUORIDE PH SULFATE TDS ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CHROMIUM COBALT METALS MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC METALS METALS METALS METALS METALS METALS METALS LEAD LITHIUM MERCURY MOLYBDENUM SELENIUM 1 MW-22B 1/24/ J U.54 J U.175 U.3 U U U.85 J. U.175 U.376 U MW-22B 2/2/ U.1 U U.175 U.3 U.423 J.52 U U.72 J. U.175 U.121 U.599 U 3 MW-22B 3/28/ J U.3 J J.175 U.3 U.473 J.52 U.1359 J-.4 U.95 J. U.175 U U 4 MW-22B 4/25/ J U.19 J U.175 U.3 U.436 J.52 U U.55 J. U.175 U.291 U.124 U 5 MW-22B 5/24/ J U.29 J U.17 U.3 U.493 J.52 U U.7 J. U.17 U U.527 U 6 MW-22B 6/2/ U.38 J U.17 U.3 U U U.56 J. U.17 U U 7 MW-22B 7/24/ U.24 J U.17 U.45 U U U.5 J. U.32 J.59 U.543 J 8 MW-22B 8/23/ U.3 J J.17 U.45 U U U.33 J. U.17 U.364 U (DM-1) MW-22B 1/12/ J MW-23B 1/26/ J U.45 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.285 U. U.175 U.328 U.77 U 2 MW-23B 2/2/ J U.1 U U.9 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.285 U.3 J.175 U.178 U.54 U 3 MW-23B 3/28/ J-.89 J U.15 U U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U.335 J-.4 U.285 U. U.175 U.374 U.389 U 4 MW-23B (D) 4/25/ J U.24 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.285 U. U.175 U.641 U U 4 MW-23B 4/25/ J-.89 J J.25 J U.19 J.3 U.475 U.52 U U.43 J. U.175 U.346 U U 5 MW-23B 5/24/ J-.83 J U.19 J U.17 U.3 U.47 U.52 U U.45 J. U.17 U.172 U U 6 MW-23B 6/2/ J U.24 J U.17 U.3 U.47 U.52 U U.28 U. U.17 U -.1 U.36 U 7 MW-23B (D) 7/24/ J U.33 J U.17 U.45 U.8 J.52 U U.28 U.16 J.17 U.45 U.322 U 7 MW-23B 7/24/ J U.21 J U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U.28 U. U.17 U.896 U.522 J 8 MW-23B 8/23/ J U.15 U UJ.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U J.28 U. U.17 U.696 U (DM-1) MW-23B (D) 1/12/ J (DM-1) MW-23B 1/12/ J MW-24B 1/25/ J U.15 U J.175 U.3 U.67 J.52 U J.285 U. U.175 U.192 U.676 U 2 MW-24B 2/2/ U.1 U.2.1 U.175 U.3 U.48 J.52 U U.285 U.146 J.175 U.15 U.482 U 3 MW-24B 3/28/ J-.94 J U.15 U J.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U.7859 J-.4 U.285 U. U.175 U U 4 MW-24B 4/25/ J-.83 J U.15 U U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.285 U.136 J.175 U.542 U U 5 MW-24B 5/24/ J-.81 J U.28 J U.17 U.3 U.5 J.52 U U.28 U. U.17 U.796 U.455 U 6 MW-24B 6/2/ J U.16 J U.17 U.3 U.47 U.52 U.39.4 U.28 U. U.17 U.7 U.168 U 7 MW-24B 7/24/ J U.15 U U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U.28 U. U.17 U.415 U.724 J 8 MW-24B 8/23/ U U.15 U J.17 U.45 U.54 J.52 U U.28 U. U.17 U.462 U (DM-1) MW-24B 1/12/ J MW-212A (D) 1/26/ U.28 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.3. U.175 U.25 U.633 U 1 MW-212A 1/26/ U.29 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.12. U.175 U.276 U.652 U 2 MW-212A 2/21/ U.1 U U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.76. U.175 U.128 U.566 U 3 MW-212A 3/27/ J U.18 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U.6336 J-.4 U.152. U.175 U U 4 MW-212A 4/26/ U.24 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.717. U.175 U U 5 MW-212A 5/23/ U.37 J U.17 U.3 U.47 U.52 U J.62. U.17 U.131 U.968 U 6 MW-212A 6/21/ U.19 J U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U.459 J. U.17 U U 7 MW-212A 7/25/ U.34 J U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U.429 J. U.17 U.127 U.312 U 8 MW-212A 8/23/ U.28 J UJ.17 U.45 U.41 J.52 U U.314 J. U.17 U.472 U (DM-1) MW-212A 1/13/ J MW-213A 1/25/ U U.175 U.137 J.4 J.13 J.23 J.4 U U.175 U.28 U.687 U 2 MW-213A 2/21/ J U.2357 U U.175 U.44 J.475 U.52 U U U.175 U.163 U.58 U 3 MW-213A 3/27/ J U J.175 U.6 U.475 U.52 U.2897 J.4 U U.175 U.271 U.992 U 4 MW-213A 4/26/ J-.19 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U U.175 U.19 U U 5 MW-213A (D) 5/23/ J U U.17 U.3 U.47 U.52 U J U.17 U.345 U.736 U 5 MW-213A 5/23/ J U U.39 J.3 U.47 U.52 U J U.17 U.74 U.93 U 6 MW-213A 6/21/ U U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U U.17 U.679 U MW-213A 7/31/ U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U.2186 J.4 U.464. U.17 U.426 U MW-213A 8/23/ U J.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U J.17 U.773 U (DM-1) MW-213A 1/12/ MW-215A 1/24/ J U.2 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U J.285 U.126 J.175 U.339 U MW-215A (D) 2/21/ U.15 U.88.1 U.175 U.3 U.48 J.52 U U.285 U. U.175 U.158 U.486 U 2 MW-215A 2/21/ U.15 U U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.3 J. U.175 U.145 U.528 U 3 MW-215A 3/27/ J U.15 U J.175 U.3 U.48 J.52 U.1539 J-.4 U.33 J. U.175 U.785 U.236 U 4 MW-215A 4/26/ J U.15 U U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.285 U. U.175 U.691 U U 5 MW-215A 5/23/ U.21 J U.17 U.3 U.48 J.52 U J.28 U. U.17 U.413 U U 6 MW-215A 6/21/ U.15 U U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U.36 J. U.17 U.756 U.539 U 7 MW-215A 7/31/ U.15 U U.17 U.45 U.6 J.52 U U.35 J. U.17 U.33 U -.28 U 8 MW-215A (D) 8/23/ U.15 U J.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U.28 U. U.17 U.466 U MW-215A 8/23/ U.15 U J.17 U.75 J.47 J.52 U U.28 U. U.17 U.184 U (DM-1) MW-215A 1/13/ J MW-215B 1/24/ J U.49 J U.175 U.71 J-.228 J.21 J J J.175 U.355 U.83 2 MW-215B 2/21/ U.15 U U.175 U.55 J.475 U.52 U U.472 J. U.175 U.212 U.5 U 3 MW-215B 3/27/ J U.21 J U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U.649 J-.4 U J.175 U.356 U.151 U 4 MW-215B 4/26/ J J U.15 U U.175 U.3 U.475 U.52 U U.363 J.156 J.175 U.315 U.787 U 5 MW-215B 5/23/ U.34 J U.17 U.3 U.47 U.52 U J.422 J. U.17 U.972 U.219 U 6 MW-215B 6/21/ U.15 U U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U.267 J. U.17 U.349 U -.51 U 7 MW-215B 7/31/ U.15 U U.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U U.27 J. U.17 U U 8 MW-215B 8/23/ U.15 U UJ.17 U.45 U.47 U.52 U.73.4 U.255 J. U.17 U.875 U (DM-1) MW-215B 1/13/ J MW-216A 1/25/ U J.175 U.3 U U J.4 J. U.175 U MW-216A 2/2/ U.9 U U.9 U.3 U U U.285 U. U.175 U.157 U.58 U 3 MW-216A 3/28/ J U J.175 U.3 U U J-.4 U.285 U. U.175 U METALS THALLIUM RADIUM-226 RADIUM-228 METALS METALS METALS METALS METALS RADIOCHEM RADIOCHEM MG/L MG/L MG/L S.U. MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L PCI/L PCI/L Sheet 1 of 2
19 TABLE 3-1 CCR RULE GROUNDWATER MONITORING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY HATFIELD'S FERRY CCB LANDFILL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER SAMPLING EVENT NO. 2 WELL ID3 SAMPLE DATE BORON METALS MG/L APPENDIX III (all Chemical Constituents sampled as TOTAL RECOVERABLE) 1 APPENDIX IV (all Chemical Constituents sampled as TOTAL RECOVERABLE) 1 CALCIUM CHLORIDE FLUORIDE PH SULFATE TDS ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CHROMIUM COBALT METALS MISC MISC MISC MISC MISC METALS METALS METALS METALS METALS METALS METALS LEAD LITHIUM MERCURY MOLYBDENUM SELENIUM METALS THALLIUM RADIUM-226 RADIUM-228 METALS METALS METALS METALS METALS RADIOCHEM RADIOCHEM MG/L MG/L MG/L S.U. MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L PCI/L PCI/L 4 MW-216A 4/25/ J-.158 J U U.25 J.3 U U U.285 U.7 J.175 U MW-216A 5/24/ J-.91 J U U.27 J.3 U U U.28 U.124 J.17 U MW-216A 6/2/ J U U.17 U.3 U U U.28 U. U.17 U.662 U.287 U 7 MW-216A 7/24/ J U.83 J U.17 U.45 U U U.28 U.272 J.17 U J 8 MW-216A 8/24/ U.98 J J.2 J.45 U U U.28 U.275 J.17 U.787 U (DM-1) MW-216A 1/12/ J MW-22A 1/23/ J U U.175 U.3 U.8.52 U J.2 J. U.175 U.423 U.558 U 2 MW-22A 2/2/ J U J.175 U.3 U U U.94 J.17 J.175 U.169 U.544 U 3 MW-22A (D) 3/27/ J U J.175 U.3 U U.6826 J-.4 U.77 J. U.175 U U 3 MW-22A 3/27/ J U U.175 U.3 U U.7278 J-.4 U.79 J. U.175 U U 4 MW-22A 4/25/ J-.62 J U U.175 U.3 U U U.66 J. U.175 U.8.2 U 5 MW-22A 5/23/ J U U.17 U.3 U U J.68 J. U.17 U U 6 MW-22A (D) 6/2/ J U J.17 U.45 UJ.8153 J-.52 U.7296 J-.4 U.53 J. U.17 U.144 U -.89 U 6 MW-22A 6/2/ J U U.17 U.3 U U U.41 J. U.17 U U 7 MW-22A 7/24/ J U U.17 U.45 U U.72.4 U.28 U. U.17 U U 8 MW-22A 8/24/ J U J.17 U.91 J U U.28 U. U.17 U U 9 (DM-1) MW-22A 1/12/ J NOTES: 1 Lab analyses were completed by Beta Lab and TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc., both of which are accredited/certified laboratories: Beta Lab ISO/IEC 1725 Cert No (Exp ) and ISO/IEC 91 Cert. No IS7 (Exp ) and TestAmerica NELAP Identification Number: 2-416, EPA Region: 3, Expiration Date: Event Nos. 1 through 8 were background/baseline sampling events. Event No. 9 was the initial Detection Monitoring (DM-1) sampling event. 3 Field duplicate samples that were taken for Quality Control purposes are noted with a (D). DATA QUALIFER DEFINITIONS: The following definitions provide brief explanations of the validation qualifiers assigned to results in the data review process. U J The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected at a level greater than or equal to the level of the adjusted method detection limit for sample and method. The analyte was positively identified and the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample (due either to the quality of the data generated because certain quality control criteria were not met, or the concentration of the analyte was below the reporting limit). J+ The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high. J- The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased low. UJ The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected. The reported detection limit is approximate and may be inaccurate or imprecise. R The sample result (detected) is unusable due to the quality of the data generated because certain criteria were not met. The analyte may or may not be present in sample UR The sample result (nondetected) is unusable due to the quality of the data generated because certain criteria were not met. The analyte may or may not be present in sample. Sheet 2 of 2
20 FIGURES
21 FIGURE NUMBER 1 4 DRAWN BY: S. PAXTON 1/26/ CHECKED BY: B. BAKER/26/18 APPROVED BY: B. BAKER 1/26/ REVISION GREENSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION CONTRACT NUMBER: 212C-SW Feet HATFIELD'S FERRY CCR RULE GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM CCB LANDFILL (U) MW-212B (165.5) MW-212A (U) MW-213B (U) MW-213A (U) 8 Topographic Contour (1-foot) Approximate Waste Boundary (15.98) Approximate Parcel Boundary Groundwater Elevation Contour (137.36) Groundwater Elevation May Uniontown Sandstone Pre-Existing Monitoring Well (6.3) MW-22A 7 (125.78) 2 1 MW-216A (U) New Piezometer Mine Spoil EASTING NORTHING ³ 1357 Coordi na tes a re i n NAD 1983 Sta te Pl a ne Penns yl va ni a South (feet) (956.72) R 5 New CCR Monitoring Well 5 Legend (138.1) 93 MW-23B (D) 1 (948.24) 9 1 WELL NO MW-22B (D) MW-23B (D) MW-24B (D) MW-212A (U) MW-212B (U) 92 MW-213A (U) MW-213B (U) MW-215A (U) MW-215B (U) MW-216A (U) MW-22A PZ-221A MW-215A (U) MW-22B (D) (N/A) MW-215B (U) R PZ-221A 1 7 (959.18) MW-24B (D) References: 1. Aerial photograph provided by ESRI's ArcGIS Online World Imagery map service ( 214 ESRI and its data suppliers). 98 from the Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access 2. Contours obtained (PASDA) website and from FirstEnergy Drawing No. C , Rev.. 3. Pre-Existing monitoring99well locations were obtained from FirstEnergy Drawing No. C , Rev.. 4. Approximate Waste Boundary lines were obtained from FirstEnergy Drawing Nos. C834825, Rev., C835358, Rev. C, C834821, Rev. 1 and C83482, Rev Approximate Parcel Boundary obtained from FirstEnergy Drawing No. C A, dated 8/31/5. 6. Monitoring well MW-22A and piezometer PZ-221A were installed by Tetra Tech, Inc. in well locations were 3 October 216. As-built Tetra Tech, Inc. on /22/216. obtained by field survey performed by PGH P:\GIS\FIRST_ENERGY\MAPDOCS\HATFIELDSFERRY_PROPOSED_MW_MAY217_CCR.MXD 1/26/18 SP
Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Rule ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT PREFACE
Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Rule ANNUAL GROUNDWATER Report Requirements PREFACE This report documents the status of the groundwater monitoring and corrective action program
More informationJanuary 31, Mr. David M. Heger Senior Counsel AES US Services, LLC One Monument Circle, Suite 701A Indianapolis, Indiana
January 31, 2018 Mr. David M. Heger Senior Counsel AES US Services, LLC One Monument Circle, Suite 701A Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2901 ATC Group Services LLC 7988 Centerpoint Dr. Suite 100 Indianapolis,
More informationDisposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Rule ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT PREFACE
Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Rule ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT Report Requirements PREFACE This report documents the status of the groundwater
More information2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Correction Action Report
2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Correction Action Report Milton R. Young Station Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Disposal Facility Center, ND Prepared for Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. December
More informationJanuary 31, Mr. Lon Petts Hoosier Energy REC, Inc. P.O. Box 908 Bloomington, Indiana 47402
ATC Group Services LLC January 31, 2018 Mr. Lon Petts Hoosier Energy REC, Inc. P.O. Box 908 Bloomington, Indiana 47402 7988 Centerpoint Dr. Suite 100 Indianapolis, IN 46256 Phone +1 317 849 4990 Fax +1
More informationFIRST ANNUAL COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR) GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT LANDFILL AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
FIRST ANNUAL COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR) GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT LANDFILL AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS R.D. MORROW, SR. GENERATING STATION 304 OLD OKAHOLA SCHOOL ROAD PURVIS,
More information2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report
Marion Power Plant Emery Pond 2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Marion Power Plant Southern Illinois Power Cooperative Marion, Williamson County, Illinois Table of Contents
More informationJanuary 31, Mr. David M. Heger Senior Counsel AES US Services, LLC One Monument Circle, Suite 701A Indianapolis, Indiana
January 31, 2018 Mr. David M. Heger Senior Counsel AES US Services, LLC One Monument Circle, Suite 701A Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2901 ATC Group Services LLC 7988 Centerpoint Dr. Suite 100 Indianapolis,
More informationINITIAL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT FOR 2017 FOR DISPOSAL AREA 8
INITIAL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT FOR 2017 FOR DISPOSAL AREA 8 U.S. EPA COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR) RULE BRUNNER ISLAND STEAM ELECTRIC STATION EAST MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP
More informationGroundwater Monitoring System Certification
Groundwater Monitoring System Certification for Compliance with the Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule Xcel Energy July 21, 2016, Denver, Colorado Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Facility
More informationREPORT ON 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT A.B. BROWN GENERATING STATION WEST FRANKLIN, INDIANA
www.haleyaldrich.com REPORT ON 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT WEST FRANKLIN, INDIANA by Haley & Aldrich, Inc. Greenville, South Carolina for Southern Indiana Gas and Electric
More informationSECOND ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT U.S. EPA COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR) RULE
SECOND ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT - 2018 U.S. EPA COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR) RULE DISPOSAL AREA 8 BRUNNER ISLAND STEAM ELECTRIC STATION EAST MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP YORK
More informationGroundwater Monitoring Requirements of the CCR Rule What s Next?
2017 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference in Lexington, KY - May 9-11, 2017 http://www.flyash.info/ Groundwater Monitoring Requirements of the CCR Rule What s Next? Thomas A. Mann, PE SynTerra Corporation,
More informationREPORT ON 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT A.B. BROWN GENERATING STATION WEST FRANKLIN, INDIANA
www.haleyaldrich.com REPORT ON 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT A.B. BROWN GENERATING STATION WEST FRANKLIN, INDIANA by Haley & Aldrich, Inc. Greenville, South Carolina for
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Year Ending December 31, 2017
City Water, Light & Power Coal Combustion Residuals Surface Impoundments Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Year Ending December 31, 2017 January 2018 Prepared for: City Water,
More informationANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT FOR 2018 JAMES RIVER POWER STATION (JRPS) Prepared for:
ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT FOR 2018 JAMES RIVER POWER STATION (JRPS) Prepared for: City Utilities of Springfield 301 E. Central Street Springfield, Missouri Prepared by:
More informationINITIAL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
Prepared For: Fort Armistead Road Lot 15 Landfill, LLC 1005 Brandon Shores Road, Suite 100 Baltimore, Maryland 21226 INITIAL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT FEDERAL CCR RULE
More informationANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT ACTIVE COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS LANDFILL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 2017 Escalante Generating Station Prewitt, New Mexico Submitted To: Tri-State Generation
More informationINITIAL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT FOR YEAR 2017 FOR ASH BASIN 6
INITIAL ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT FOR YEAR 2017 FOR ASH BASIN 6 U.S. EPA COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR) RULE BRUNNER ISLAND STEAM ELECTRIC STATION EAST MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP
More information2017 GROUNDWATER MONITORING & CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL ASH PONDS ELMER SMITH STATION DAVIESS COUNTY OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY
2017 GROUNDWATER MONITORING & CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL ASH PONDS ELMER SMITH STATION DAVIESS COUNTY OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY Prepared For: OWENSBORO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY Prepared By:
More informationGroundwater Monitoring System Certification
Groundwater Monitoring System Certification for Compliance with the Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule Xcel Energy May 4, 2016, Boulder County, Co lorado Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0
More informationPurpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report
Purpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report During the initial phase of ground water monitoring, the CCR rule requires AEP to collect at least eight independent samples from at least one up-gradient
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report
Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Southwestern Electric Power Company John W. Turk Power Plant Landfill CCR Management Unit Fulton, Arkansas January 218 Prepared by: American Electric Power Service
More information2018 GROUNDWATER MONITORING & CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL ASH PONDS ELMER SMITH STATION DAVIESS COUNTY OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY
2018 GROUNDWATER MONITORING & CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL ASH PONDS ELMER SMITH STATION DAVIESS COUNTY OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY Prepared For: OWENSBORO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY Prepared By:
More informationValmont Station CCR Landfill and Surface Impoundments Notification of Statistically Significant Levels over Groundwater Protections Standards
Valmont Station CCR Landfill and Surface Impoundments Notification of Statistically Significant Levels over Groundwater Protections Standards Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo), an Xcel Energy Company,
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report
nnual Monitoring Report ppalachian Power Company John E. mos Plant Landfill CCR Management Unit Winfield, West Virginia January 218 Prepared by: merican Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza
More informationOverview of the EPA RCRA Coal Ash Rule
Overview of the EPA RCRA Coal Ash Rule Outline: I. RCRA Citizen Suit Provisions II. Applicability of the Coal Ash Rule III. Major Deficiencies of the Rule IV. Major Advances of the Rule V. General Solid
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report
nnual Monitoring Report Cardinal Operating Company Cardinal Plant Bottom sh Brilliant, OH January 218 Prepared by: merican Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, Ohio 43215 Table
More information2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report
2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Prairie Creek Generating Station Cedar Rapids, Iowa Prepared for: Alliant Energy 25216074.18 January 31, 2019 2830 Dairy Drive Madison, WI
More information2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
Northern Indiana Public Service Company R.M. Schahfer Generating Station Wheatfield, Indiana CCR Management Unit Referred to as Schahfer Landfill Phase V and Phase VI 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING
More informationACTIVE COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS LANDFILL GROUNDWATER STATISTICAL METHOD CERTIFICATION. Escalante Generating Station
ACTIVE COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS LANDFILL GROUNDWATER STATISTICAL METHOD CERTIFICATION Escalante Generating Station Prewitt, New Mexico REPORT Submitted To: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association,
More information2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Generating Station Chesterton, Indiana CCR Management Unit Referred to as Bailly Primary 2 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
More informationPrimary Bottom Ash Pond CCR Management Unit
nnual Groundwater Monitoring Report Southwestern Electric Power Company J. Robert Welsh Power Plant Primary Bottom sh CCR Management Unit 1187 Country Road 486 Titus County Pittsburg, Texas January 218
More information2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Generating Station Chesterton, Indiana CCR Management Unit Referred to as Bailly Boiler Slag Pond 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
More informationSludge Sedimentation Basins Statistical Methods Certification per 40 CFR (f)(6)
Sludge Sedimentation Basins Statistical Methods Certification per 40 CFR 257.93(f)(6) Clover Power Station Clover, Virginia October 2017 Prepared For Virginia Electric and Power Company R. Kent Nilsson,
More informationANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR) RULE
0 ANNUAL GROUWATER MONITORING A CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL COMBUSTION RESIUALS (CCR) RULE GREEN STATION CCR LAFILL GREEN STATION CCR SURFACE IMPOUMENT REI/HMPL STATION CCR SURFACE IMPOUMENT WEBSTER
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report
nnual Monitoring Report Kentucky Power Company Big Sandy Plant Bottom sh Pond CCR Management Unit Louisa, Kentucky January 2018 Prepared by: merican Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza
More informationPresque Isle Power Plant Ash Land ill No. 3 Marquette, MI
2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT Presque Isle Power Plant Ash Land ill No. 3 Marquette, MI We Energies January 31, 2018 PRESQUE ISLE POWER PLANT ASH LANDFILL NO. 3 2017 ANNUAL
More informationThe electronic PDF version of this paper is the official archival record for the CCGP journal.
Coal Combustion and Gasification Products is an international, peer-reviewed on-line journal that provides free access to full-text papers, research communications and supplementary data. Submission details
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report
nnual Monitoring Report Kentucky Power Company Mitchell Plant Bottom sh Moundsville, WV January 2018 Prepared by: merican Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, Ohio 43215 Table
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report
nnual Groundwater Monitoring Report Southwestern Electric Power Company Flint Creek Power Plant Primary Bottom sh Pond CCR Management Unit Gentry, rkansas January 218 Prepared by: merican Electric Power
More information2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report. Columbia Energy Center Dry Ash Disposal Facility Pardeeville, Wisconsin
2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Columbia Energy Center Dry Ash Disposal Facility Pardeeville, Wisconsin Prepared for: Alliant Energy Prepared by: SCS ENGINEERS 2830 Dairy
More informationBACKGROUND WATER QUALITY STATISTICAL CERTIFICATION
BACKGROUND WATER QUALITY STATISTICAL CERTIFICATION for Compliance with the Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule Public Service Company of Colorado January 15, 2018 PSCo Background Water Quality Statistical
More informationGROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT MONITORING REPORT APRIL 2014
Tennessee Valley Authority John Sevier Fossil Plant GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT MONITORING REPORT APRIL 2014 Prepared by Amos L. Smith, PG Chattanooga, Tennessee June 4, 2014 DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION I certify
More information2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report. Pleasant Prairie Power Plant Ash Landfill Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin.
2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Pleasant Prairie Power Plant Ash Landfill Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin We Energies January 31, 2019 2018 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND
More information2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report
Prepared For: Gavin Power, LLC Cheshire, Ohio Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Bottom Ash Complex Gavin Power Plant Cheshire, Ohio 31 January 2018 Environmental Resources Management
More informationGROUNDWATER STATS CONSULTING
GROUNDWATER STATS CONSULTING October 11, 218 HR Green, Inc. Attn: Mr. Greg Brennan 871 Earhart Ln, SW Cedar Rapids, Iowa 5244 Dear Mr. Brennan, Groundwater Stats Consulting, formerly the statistical consulting
More informationCaledonia Ash Land ill Caledonia, WI
2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT Caledonia Ash Land ill Caledonia, WI We Energies January 31, 2018 CALEDONIA ASH LANDFILL 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE
More informationGROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM AND SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM
GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM AND SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM CCR LANDFILL MUSCATINE POWER AND WATER Muscatine County, Iowa May 18, 2016 Prepared For: Muscatine Power and Water Prepared By: O:\10100095.03\6-7.
More information2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUE (CCR) LANDFILL PERMIT NO. #70-SDP-06-82P
HR Green, Inc. Project No. 10100095.10 2017 Annual GMCA Report CCR Landfill Muscatine Power & Water 2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUE (CCR) LANDFILL
More informationRE: Water Quality Split Samples April 2017 Charah Brickhaven Facility
June 13, 2017 Mr. Brian Burkhart, P.E. Environmental Quality Director Chatham County 720 Renaissance Drive Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312 RE: Water Quality Split Samples April 2017 Charah Brickhaven Facility
More informationThe Relationship Between Water and the CCR Rule
The Relationship Between Water and the CCR Rule A Vital Issue for CCR Rule Compliance Teresa L. Entwistle, P.E., CFM AECOM St. Louis, MO 07.11.16 MWCC Conference Introduction With the strict regulations
More informationHatfield s Ferry Landfill Unstable Areas Demonstration
Hatfield s Ferry Landfill Unstable Areas Demonstration Hatfield s Ferry Landfill October 2018 Prepared for: 76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308-1812 Prepared by: GAI Consultants, Inc. Murrysville Office
More informationPurpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report
Purpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report During the initial phase of ground water monitoring, the CCR rule requires AEP to collect at least eight independent samples from at least one up-gradient
More informationPurpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report
Purpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report During the initial phase of ground water monitoring, the CCR rule requires AEP to collect at least eight independent samples from at least one up-gradient
More informationPurpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report
Purpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report During the initial phase of ground water monitoring, the CCR rule requires AEP to collect at least eight independent samples from at least one up-gradient
More information2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report
Solid Waste Management Consultants Offices Nationwide Dallas / Fort Worth Office 1901 Central Drive Suite 550 Bedford, Texas 76021 817-571-2288 Main 800-579-6671 817-571-2188 FAX January 30, 2018 SCS Project
More information2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report
Prepared For: Gavin Power, LLC Cheshire, Ohio Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Fly Ash Reservoir Gavin Power Plant Cheshire, Ohio 31 January 2018 Environmental Resources Management
More informationAlternative Source Demonstration
Consulting Engineers and Scientists Alternative Source Demonstration Brayton Point Power Station Somerset, Massachusetts Submitted to: Brayton Point, LLC 165 Des Peres Road, Suite 23 St. Louis, MO 63131
More informationPurpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report
Purpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report During the initial phase of ground water monitoring, the CCR rule requires AEP to collect at least eight independent samples from at least one up-gradient
More informationPurpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report
Purpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report During the initial phase of ground water monitoring, the CCR rule requires AEP to collect at least eight independent samples from at least one up-gradient
More informationGreen Station CCR Surface Impoundment Sebree Generating Station Address: 9000 Highway 2096 Robards, Kentucky 42452
Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Groundwater Monitoring System and Statistical Methods Assessment and Certification
More informationGreen Station CCR Surface Impoundment Sebree Generating Station Address: 9000 Highway 2096 Robards, Kentucky 42452
Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Groundwater Monitoring System and Statistical Methods Assessment and Certification
More informationPurpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report
Purpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report During the initial phase of ground water monitoring, the CCR rule requires AEP to collect at least eight independent samples from at least one up-gradient
More informationANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR) RULE
0 ANNUAL GROUNWATER MONITORING AN CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT COAL COMBUSTION RESIUALS (CCR) RULE.B. WILSON CCR LANFILL OHIO COUNTY, KENTUCKY for: Big Rivers Electric Corporation.B. Wilson Generating Station
More informationCCR Landfill Information. D.B. Wilson CCR Landfill D.B. Wilson Generating Station 5663 State Route 85 West Centertown, KY 42328
Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Landfill Groundwater Monitoring System and Statistical Method Assessment and Certification
More informationDETECTION MONITORING STATISTICAL METHODS CERTIFICATION REPORT
Prepared for Fort Armistead Road Lot 15 Landfill, LLC 1005 Brandon Shores Road, Suite 100 Baltimore, Maryland 21226 DETECTION MONITORING STATISTICAL METHODS CERTIFICATION REPORT FEDERAL CCR RULE LOT 15
More informationPurpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report
Purpose of Statistical Analysis Summary Report During the initial phase of ground water monitoring, the CCR rule requires AEP to collect at least eight independent samples from at least one up-gradient
More informationTHE COST OF COAL ASH MISMANAGEMENT: ENERGY FINANCE 2015 CONFERENCE
THE COST OF COAL ASH MISMANAGEMENT: ENERGY FINANCE 2015 CONFERENCE Eric Schaeffer/Environmental Integrity Project March 17, 2015 Final Coal Ash Rule Location Restrictions Structural Stability Requirements
More informationTechnical Memorandum Groundwater Quality Sampling, November 2010 Event
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Technical Memorandum Groundwater Quality Sampling, November 2010 Event Date: 10 March 2011 To: From: Subject: Amy Blain City of Longview Steve Misner Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
More information2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT EPA CCR RULE COMPLIANCE. SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS: Wateree Station: Ash Pond
2017 ANNAL GRONDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT EPA CCR RLE COMPLIANCE SOTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS: Wateree Station: Ash Pond January 2018 Prepared by: Brian S. Boutin, PG Nautilus Geologic
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report. The business of sustainability
Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report CPS Energy Calaveras Power Station Fly Ash Landfill San Antonio, Texas January 2018 www.erm.com The business of sustainability Calaveras Power
More information2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report
2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Lansing Generating Station Lansing, Iowa Prepared for: Alliant Energy 25216070.18 January 31, 2019 2830 Dairy Drive Madison, WI 53718-6751
More information2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report
2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Primary Ash Pond Columbia Energy Center Pardeeville, Wisconsin Prepared for: Alliant Energy 25216067.18 January 31, 2019 2830 Dairy Drive
More informationCoal Combustion Residual Statistical Method Certification for the CCR Landfill at the Boardman Power Plant Boardman, Oregon
Coal Combustion Residual Statistical Method Certification for the CCR Landfill at the Boardman Power Plant Boardman, Oregon Prepared for Portland General Electric October 13, 2017 CH2M HILL Engineers,
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report
Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report DTE Electric Company Monroe Power Plant Fly Ash Basin Coal Combustion Residual Unit 7955 East Dunbar Road Monroe, Michigan January 2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring
More informationTechnical Memorandum Groundwater Quality Sampling, First 2010 Semiannual Event
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Technical Memorandum Groundwater Quality Sampling, First 2010 Semiannual Event Date: 30 July 2010 To: From: Subject: Amy Blain City of Longview Steve Misner Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
More information2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report
Prepared For: Gavin Power, LLC Cheshire, Ohio Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Residual Waste Landfill Gavin Power Plant Cheshire, Ohio 31 January 2018 Environmental Resources
More informationGroundwater Forensics to Evaluate Molybdenum Concentrations Near a CCR Landfill
15 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference in Nasvhille, TN - May 5-7, 15 http://www.flyash.info/ Groundwater Forensics to Evaluate Molybdenum Concentrations Near a CCR Landfill Bruce R. Hensel 1, Thomas J.
More informationGroundwater Monitoring Statistical Methods Certification City of Grand Island, Nebraska Platte Generating Station Fossil Fuel Combustion Ash Landfill
Groundwater Monitoring Statistical Methods Certification City of Platte Generating Station Fossil Fuel Combustion Ash Landfill NDEQ Permit No. NE0203831 Facility ID No. IWM 58027 Submittal Date: December
More informationLivingston County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division. Hydrogeologic Investigation Requirements for Land Division Developments
Livingston County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division Hydrogeologic Investigation Requirements for Land Division Developments Reviewed March 1, 2013 Table of Contents Scope/Authority..1
More informationStatistical Analysis Plan Sherco Unit 3 Landfill
Statistical Analysis Plan Sherco Unit 3 Landfill Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation 10/16/2017 Prepared by: Chuck Donkers, NSPM Nick Bonow, Carlson McCain, Inc. Statistical Analysis
More informationShallow Land Disposal Area (SLDA)
Shallow Land Disposal Area (SLDA) Parks Township, PA Groundwater Monitoring Review and 2013 Sampling Results Pittsburgh and Buffalo Districts Building Strong US Army Corps of Engineers Building Strong
More informationGroundwater Statistical Analysis Plan
Groundwater Statistical Analysis Plan Milton R. Young Station Coal Combustion Residuals Waste Disposal Facility Center, ND Prepared for Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. October 2017 Groundwater Statistical
More informationLiner Design Criteria Report Jeffrey Energy Center Inactive Bottom Ash Pond
Liner Design Criteria Report Jeffrey Energy Center Inactive Bottom Ash Pond Prepared for: Westar Energy Jeffrey Energy Center St. Marys, Kansas Prepared by: APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. A
More informationDETECTION MONITORING STATISTICAL METHODS CERTIFICATION U.S. EPA COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUAL RULE
DETECTION MONITORING STATISTICAL METHODS CERTIFICATION U.S. EPA COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUAL RULE COAL ASH PONDS ELMER SMITH STATION DAVIESS COUNTY OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY Prepared For: OWENSBORO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
More information2.0 BACKGROUND. 2.1 Project Area Background
2.0 BACKGROUND Due to concerns regarding potential impacts to groundwater quality from the use of fly ash as fill at the Battlefield Golf Club, the City of Chesapeake is undertaking efforts to supply water
More informationAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Report
Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report DTE Electric Company Belle River Power Plant Diversion Basin 4505 King Road China Township, Michigan January 2018 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report DTE Electric
More informationCoal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Ash Monofill Groundwater Detection Monitoring Plan
Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Ash Monofill Groundwater Detection Monitoring Plan Revision 0 Rawhide Energy Station Laramie County, Colorado Platte River Power Authority Project Number: 60514655 October
More informationEscalante Generating Station. Submitted To: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. Post Office Box Denver, Colorado 80233
ACTIVE COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS LANDFILL GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION Escalante Generating Station Prewitt, New Mexico REPORT Submitted To: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association,
More informationPond D Closure Alternatives Report
Pond D Closure Alternatives Report Hutsonville Power Station Crawford County Illinois April 27, 2009 Project No: 1954 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...1-3 1.1 Background...1-3 1.2 Closure Objectives
More information2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report. Edgewater Generating Station Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Alliant Energy.
2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Report Edgewater Generating Station Sheboygan, Wisconsin Prepared for: Alliant Energy Prepared by: SCS ENGINEERS 2830 Dairy Drive Madison, Wisconsin
More informationTrans- Ash Landfill Benton County, Tennessee Class II Disposal Facility
1 Trans- Ash Landfill Benton County, Tennessee Class II Disposal Facility We have reviewed the Environmental Integrity report concerning the Trans Ash Landfill and believe there are several errors and/or
More informationCCR RULE 40CFR LOCATION RESTRICTIONS CRITERIA CERTIFICATION REPORT ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY COMANCHE STATION PUEBLO, COLORADO
CCR RULE 40CFR 257.60 64 LOCATION RESTRICTIONS CRITERIA CERTIFICATION REPORT ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY COMANCHE STATION PUEBLO, COLORADO Prepared For: Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) Prepared by:
More informationGuidance for Remediation Program Landfills and Open Dumps. MSECA s Quarterly Meeting February 19, 2019
Guidance for Remediation Program Landfills and Open Dumps MSECA s Quarterly Meeting February 19, 2019 Remediation Program Landfills and Open Dumps Guidance Resource www.idem.in.gov/cleanups/ files/tech_guidance_landfill
More informationCell 2 Composite Liner Design Certification
Cell 2 Composite Liner Design Certification SWEPCO John W. Turk, Jr. Power Plant Class 3N Landfill Permit No. 311-S3N-R1 AFIN: 29-56 July 16, 218 Project No. 35177127 Prepared for: Southwestern Electric
More informationPasco County Florida. Water Monitoring Plan West Pasco Class I Landfill PA87-23, WACS # Revised April 2014
Pasco County Florida Water Monitoring Plan West Pasco Class I Landfill PA87-23, WACS # 45799 Revised April 2014 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction... 1 Section 2 Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network...
More information2017 ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT EPA CCR RULE COMPLIANCE. SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS: Wateree Station: FGD Pond
2017 ANNAL GROWATER MONITORING A CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT EPA CCR RLE COMPLIANCE SOTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS: Wateree Station: FGD Pond January 2018 Prepared by: Brian S. Boutin, PG Nautilus Geologic
More informationStatistical Method Selection Certification
Statistical Method Selection Certification R.M. Heskett Station Prepared for Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. October 2017 Statistical Method Selection Certification R.M. Heskett Station Prepared for Montana-Dakota
More informationMAYO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT RISK CLASSIFICATION
MAYO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT RISK CLASSIFICATION Mayo Steam Electric Plant Overall Risk Classification DEQ has proposed the risk classification for the Ash Pond as LOW. Groundwater Key Factor. Based on the
More information