Hydrogen Storage in Road Vehicles - Regulations in Japan and Standards in the U.S. Presented by Volker Rothe StorHy final Event 3 June, 2008

Transcription

1 Hydrogen Storage in Road Vehicles - Regulations in Japan and Standards in the U.S. Presented by Volker Rothe StorHy final Event 3 June, 2008

2 Topics Japanese Hydrogen Storage Regulations Scope Content Outlook U.S. Hydrogen Storage Standard (SAE J2579) General Structure Guiding Principles Compressed Hydrogen Performance Requirements Summary

3 Scope of Regulations in Japan Vehicle: Road Transportation Vehicle Law Containers & Components (High Pressure Gas Safety Law) Motor Air FC Stack Hydroge n Containers Schematic View of Vehicle (Fuel Cell Vehicle) Water Hydroge n Scope of High Pressure Gas Safety Law (1) High Pressure Hydrogen Container Receptacle (2) Stop Valve Pressure Regulator (3) Safety Valve (PRD) Regulation: (1) High Pressure Hydrogen Containers JARI S 001 (2) Stop Valve & (3) Safety Valve(PRD) JARI S 002

4 Current Standards Situation in Japan Current Japanese Technical Standards (JARI S 001 & S 002) have already been applied as regulations since March JARI S 001(2004) Technical Standards for Containers for Compressed- Hydrogen Vehicle Fuel Device JARI S 002(2004) Technical Standards for Components (valve and PRD) for Compressed-Hydrogen Vehicle Fuel Device

5 Outline of Technical Standard JARI S001 Scope Minimum rupture pressure Stress ratio : 2.25 Materials Container Inspection Room Temperature Pressure Cycle Test VH3-Container and VH4-Container are permitted SUS316L, A6061T6 Maximum filling pressure shall be 35 MPa or less Internal cubic capacity shall be 360L or less The test shall be carried out by shuttling between pressure of up to 2 MPa and pressure equal to or greater than 125% of the maximum filling pressure Bonfire Test in Design Confirmation Test Gas Permeation Test in Design Confirmation Test Hydrogen Gas Cycle Test The gas filled into the container shall be hydrogen gas The rate of hydrogen gas permeation is less than 2 cm3 per hour per liter of container internal cubic capacity pressure shall be added at least 1,000 times

6 Necessity of Japanese Standards Revision JARI S 001 & S 002 are standards for initial introduction of FCVs to the market. But it is necessary to consider the revision for future mass production of FCVs. 1) Light-weight and Low-cost high-pressure hydrogen containers and components are necessary. 2) Expansion of designated materials is necessary. (In Japanese case, the current standards limit the materials that can be used in high-pressure hydrogen environment) 3) Finally standardization of material evaluation methods is necessary.

7 Concepts of New Standard for Containers 1) To change the maximum working pressure from 35MPa to 70MPa. 2) To consider the Vehicle usage, Lifetime, Load conditions and Prospective Performance. a) To change the pressure cycling test condition reflected the FCV cruising distance as a result of prospective performance and lifetime. b) To change the extreme temperature cycling test condition reflected actual low and high temperature (under high speed hydrogen supply and fast filling). 3) To guarantee the Container strength after Durability tests reflected Vehicle usage and Lifetime. a) To change the cycle numbers and condition of burst pressure test. b) To execute the sequential loading tests.

8 Draft Schedule for International Harmonization CY2007 CY2008 CY2009 CY2010 CY2011 CY2012 Japanese New Standards Data Acquisition for Draft Data Acquisition of metal materials Technical Norms for material SAE J2579 Data TIR Issue Collaborate with SAE using each data-based ISO rd DIS Issue? Harmonization Propose 3 rd DIS with SAE gtr Establishment of GTR Issue

9 SAE J2579 Technical Information Report Fuel Systems in Fuel Cell & Other Hydrogen Vehicles

10 Background Work on motor vehicle hydrogen storage system code initiated in SAE Fuel Cell Safety Work Group in Active participation by fuel cell vehicle and storage system manufacturers and testing organizations, including representation from Asia, Europe and North America. Existing codes including NGV2, EIHP, FMVSS 304 and CSA B51 considered, with focus to develop design-independent performance-based code. SAE J2579 balloted in late 2007 and published as Technical Information Report (TIR) in January Two-year period for evaluation testing and workplan items with goal to publish SAE J2579 as Recommended Practice in early 2010.

11 Verification of Compressed Hydrogen Storage System Performance Demand Distribution (Simulate Exposures in Field) Probability Hydrogen Extreme Ambient Temperatures Pressure and Temperature Cycles Extended Static Pressure Holds Production and Handling Damage Chemical exposure Penetration and Fire Capability Distribution Severity of Exposure

12 Typical Compressed Hydrogen System Receptacle with check Excess flow Full System Isolation High Pressure Regulator Low Pressure Regulator Fill Check Valve Container Isolation Valve PRV Service Defuel Shufoff PRV PRD vent Container Vessel Compressed Hydrogen Containment System Includes all components and parts that form the primary pressure boundary for stored hydrogen Downstream Hydrogen Piping for delivery to Fuel Cell System or Engine Isolates stored hydrogen from -- the remainder of the fuel system the surrounding environment

13 Principle of Design for Safety No single-point failure should cause unreasonable risk to safety or uncontrolled vehicle behavior: Fail-safe design Isolation and separation of hazards to minimize cascading of events Fault management with staged warnings and shutdowns Isolation and containment of stored hydrogen is required to practice fault management on hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles.

14 Content Section 5.2 Compressed Hydrogen Storage System Performance Requirements Expected service performance test sequence (pneumatic pressure cycling) Durability performance test sequence (hydraulic pressure cycling) Performance under service-terminating conditions

15 Expected Service (pneumatic) Burst <20% Burst Pressure 125%NWP 180%NWP 30 sec (hydr.) time 150% NWP Production Proof Pressure 25%cy -40 o C a 25%cy +50 o C b,c 125%NWP 500hr +85 o C Leak/Permeation 25%cy +50 o C 25%cy -40 o C 125%NWP 500hr +85 o C Leak/Permeation a System -40 o C 5cy +20 o C fuel; 5cy <-35 o C fuel b System +50 o C 5cy <-35 o C fuel c Service defuel rate >50cy

16 Durability Performance (hydraulic) burst <20% burst 30 sec 180%NWP Pressure 150% NWP Proof Pressure Drop Flaws & Chem 48hr 125%NWP Durability Cy 125%NWP 10cy T amb 150%NWP time

17 Service Terminating Conditions Bonfire Penetration No burst & controlled PRD release No burst Burst Pressure Cycle Life Manufacturer will establish new-vessel burst pressure and cycle life criteria

18 Key Distinctions from other Pressure Vessel Codes System-level performance code that is independent of storage system design. Uses two sequences of tests (expected service and durability performance) rather than discrete testing of virgin tanks. Specifies end-of-life (EOL) burst margins rather than beginning-of-life (BOL) burst margins. In addition to requiring EOL burst margin to be at least 1.8 times maximum working pressure, also requires EOL burst pressure to be at least 80% of virgin-tank burst pressure. Includes pneumatic cycling and sustained stand time (in expected service sequence).

19 Workplan for 2008 and 2009 Complete validation testing, and revise SAE J2579 as appropriate based on findings. Develop localized fire test procedure(s) and performance criteria for possible inclusion in SAE J2579. Consider refinements to specific provisions based on additional data analyses: Permeation requirements Number of pressure cycles Hold times and temperatures Criteria for redesign not requiring re-qualification. Re-qualification for additional service. Criteria for allowing parallel (versus series) performance testing

20 Summary JARI S 001 has almost same concept as ISO for Hydrogen Containers. Both of them have been derived from CNG standards. Revision expected to cover 70 MPa and a wider material range SAE J2579 provides performance based system level requirements to assess hydrogen storage safety while also facilitating future improvements in technology. Validation testing scheduled for completion during 2008.

21 Thank you!