AGENCY: United States Air Force (USAF)
|
|
- Kelly Doyle
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DRAFT FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT INTENT TO ADOPT THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR MULTI-USE OF LAUNCH COMPLEXES 39A AND 39B AT JOHN F. KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA AGENCY: United States Air Force (USAF) BACKGROUND: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) completed the Final Environmental Assessment for Multi-Use of Launch Complexes 39A and 39B, John F. Kennedy Space Center, FL in November 2013 to allow multiple users to prepare and launch vehicles from Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Launch Complexes (LCs) 39A and 39B. The Proposed Action would provide the continued capability of space exploration, including the processing and launching of rocket powered vehicles, to (1) enable improved access to KSC space launch and test operational capabilities by commercial and other non-nasa users; (2) advance NASA s mission by fostering a commercial space launch and services industry; and (3) improve the return on taxpayer investment of KSC spaceport facilities through expanded use and improved utilization. The 2013 NASA Final Environmental Assessment (EA) resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) signed by NASA on February 20, NASA prepared the EA in accordance with National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 United States Code 4321, et seq.); Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) ); and NASA policy and procedures (14 CFR 1216, Subpart ). Following signature of the FONSI in 2014, NASA signed an agreement with Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX) to lease LC-39A, which allowed SpaceX to construct and modify the facilities and infrastructure at LC-39A, and successfully conduct their first launch of a Falcon 9 launch vehicle on February 19, Construction of LC-39B is anticipated to be completed later in Once both complexes are completed and fully operational, users will be able to process a variety of launch vehicle systems on site (including booster component transport; stage and payload integration; system testing, and fueling) and begin conducting launches from either launch pad. All activities, including prelaunch and launch activities, would be conducted in accordance with established range safety regulations and procedures. Because the NASA Final EA Proposed Action to process launch vehicles and conduct launches is substantially similar to actions associated with USAF satellite missions and other space launches, USAF proposes to adopt the NASA Final EA for launch of the Space Test Program (STP) 2 mission on a Falcon Heavy launch vehicle in 2017 from KSC using the modified LC-39 facilities and infrastructure. Other future USAF space launch missions would follow. The USAF proposal for mission launches at KSC is consistent with NASA s plan for expanded use of KSC spaceport facilities. USAF has independently reviewed the NASA Final EA to determine it satisfies their NEPA regulations found at 32 CFR 989 (Environmental Impact Analysis Process). The USAF proposal to formally adopt the EA would be in accordance with USAF policies and procedures in 32 CFR 989.9(b) and with CEQ regulations in 40 CFR (b). The USAF NEPA strategy for applying the NASA Final EA would require the review of individual launch missions, launch programs, or launch vehicle families using the Air Force Form 813, Request for Environmental Impact Analysis, to document whether a categorical exclusion (Appendix B to 32 CFR 989) is applicable. In addition to the NASA Final EA, other applicable USAF and NASA NEPA documents would be utilized in this review process. For those USAF missions that are not covered by the NASA Final EA or other existing NEPA documents, further environmental analyses would be needed. FONSI-1
2 As part of the Air Force Form 813 process for evaluating proposals to use and launch from the LC-39 complexes, the USAF would coordinate with the KSC Environmental Management Branch for any changes in environmental conditions, operations, or regulatory requirements (e.g., climate change and sea level rise) that might alter the environmental effects, including cumulative effects, identified in the NASA Final EA. Additionally, any USAF missions affected by the following factors would require further review and environmental analyses, as needed, before given consideration for approval. 1. Would be launched on a booster vehicle not identified in the NASA Final EA 2. Carry radioactive sources that would trigger threshold requirements for conducting a safety analysis as specified in Air Force Instruction (AFI) (Nuclear Safety Review and Launch Approval for Space or Missile Use of Radioactive Material and Nuclear Systems) and Air Force Space Command Manual (Range Safety User Requirements Manual) 3. Cause the manifested launch rate (per year) to exceed the rate previously approved and permitted 4. Require the construction of any new facilities or substantial modification of existing facilities 5. Use hazardous materials in quantities exceeding the Envelope Payload Characteristics described in the NASA Environmental Assessment for Launch of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Routine Payloads on Expendable Launch Vehicles (2011) 6. Use a potentially hazardous material whose type or quantity would not be covered by new or existing local permits 7. Release material other than propulsion system exhaust or inert gases into the atmosphere during launch 8. Cause potential risk of human casualty from planned reentry debris exceeding the criteria specified in the National Space Policy, Department of Defense Instruction (Space Support), and AFI (Space Safety and Mishap Prevention Program) 9. Use Earth-pointing laser systems that do not meet the requirements of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z136.1 and ANSI Z136.6 for safe operation 10. Have the potential for substantial effects on the environment outside of the United States 11. Have the potential to create substantial public controversy related to environmental issues. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES: The Proposed Action analyzed in the NASA Final EA includes the processing and integration of launch vehicles and payload systems, and providing space launch capabilities to multiple users of LC-39A and LC-39B. As part of the LC-39 facilities, an Integration Facility would provide housing for launch vehicle preparation prior to launch. Launch vehicles covered in the EA for use at LC-39A and LC-39B include Atlas V, Delta IV, Delta IV Heavy, Liberty, Falcon 9 and 9 v1.1, Falcon Heavy, Antares, Radially Segmented Launch Vehicle, Athena IIc, Xaero, and the Space Launch System. The potential for conducting up to two launches per month from the modified facilities is planned. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: The NASA Final EA analyzed 14 environmental resource topics in detail at KSC. A summary of the potential environmental impacts from implementation of the Proposed Action and alternatives is provided below. FONSI-2
3 Land Use (EA 4.1, pages ): Conducting launches from LC-39A and LC-39B does not represent a change in land use classification for the site. Launch noise would affect Section 4(f) properties in the vicinity (i.e., publicly owned lands including Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge and Canaveral National Seashore). Due to the long history of these 4(f) properties experiencing noise from launches at KSC and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, and because no more than two launches per month would occur at the complex, the Federal Aviation Administration determined the Proposed Action would not substantially diminish the protected activities, features, or attributes of any of the 4(f) properties identified. Thus, the launches would not result in substantial impairment of the 4(f) properties. Facilities and Infrastructure (EA 4.2, pages ): Impacts on electricity, natural gas, communications, and solid waste infrastructure at KSC would be minimal. Impacts on water supply and treatment during launch operations are classified as moderate due to the increased volume of water needed for sound suppression during launch, and the acquisition of industrial wastewater permits required for launch deluge water. Transportation impacts are classified as moderate due to increased traffic and road closures during launch events. Health and Safety (EA 4.3.1, pages ): Potential adverse effects on human health and safety are possible during operational activities related to the Proposed Action. Prior to launch operations, however, NASA would establish a safe distance around LC-39 that is cleared of people. Additionally, there are no residential communities nearby. Compliance with applicable NASA, USAF, and 45th Space Wing established hazardous material and range safety regulations and procedures would mitigate the risks, and result in moderate impacts to health and safety. Water Quality (EA 4.3.2, pages ): During launch of booster systems using solid rocket propellant, the fallout of hydrogen chloride from launch exhaust emissions could result in short-term acidification of impounded surface waters near the launch pads. These waters are highly buffered and should return to pre-launch conditions within 72 hours of launch. Although the prior complex industrial wastewater permits for launch deluge water were surrendered in 2012, a new wastewater permit for LC-39A has since been issued. Launch deluge water from LC-39A would be collected, monitored, and disposed in accordance with the requirements and conditions specified in the Industrial Wastewater Facility Permit issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to SpaceX, effective May 15, Thus, the impacts on surface waters during launch are considered moderate, while impacts on groundwater would be minimal. Atmospheric Environment (EA 4.3.3, pages ): The total potential emissions of any criteria pollutants under the Proposed Action would not be expected to cause exceedances of federal or state ambient air quality standards. Combustion emissions from launch vehicles would be of short duration and rapidly dispersed. Moderate impacts would be expected on air quality from launch operations. Noise and Vibration (EA 4.3.4, pages ): Moderate impacts would be expected from increased noise levels during launch. Noise levels from launch are of short duration (less than 30 seconds) and diminish quickly as the vehicle rises. Sonic boom levels would be less than those previously experienced during Space Shuttle launches and reentry. Biological Resources (EA 4.3.5, pages ): Acid deposition in launch emissions could adversely affect vegetation in the exhaust plume; however, changes in plant community composition have not been documented from prior launches. Impacts on wildlife from launch noise would be minimal, resulting in the interruption of normal behavior only twice per month. Compliance with the current KSC exterior lighting requirements during night launches would lessen the potential for disorientation impacts to nesting and hatching marine turtles. Additionally, it is likely that the density of marine mammals and sea FONSI-3
4 turtles in the splash down zones is low. Thus, the probability of vehicle elements striking animals is negligible. Geology and Soil (EA 4.3.6, pages ): Chemical characteristics of soils in the vicinity of the launch pads could be altered by deposition from the launch exhaust plume. These impacts would be moderate, but the buffering capacity of the soils prevents long-term effects. Historic and Cultural Resources (EA 4.3.7, pages ): For KSC operations, NASA has a programmatic agreement with the State Historic Preservation Officer for the protection of historic properties on the range. By complying with the programmatic agreement, conducting launches from LC- 39 is not expected to impact historic and cultural resources. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management (EA 4.3.8, pages ): Wastes generated by range users would be properly managed and disposed of in full regulatory compliance. Impacts due to use of large quantities of hazardous materials during processing of launch vehicles would be measurable, but could be reduced through appropriate management and conservation measures and would therefore be moderate. Global Environment (EA 4.3.9, pages ): Increased energy use related to the Proposed Action would result in an increased generation of carbon dioxide. With continued implementation of energy conservation programs at KSC and other measures that minimize the use of fossil fuels, it is expected that emissions from the additional workforce and increased flight activities would not make a substantial contribution to greenhouse gas emissions or climate change. Socioeconomics and Children s Environmental Health and Safety (EA , pages ): Operations associated with the Proposed Action would be beneficial to the local economy from the creation of full-time jobs. In addition, increased noise during launches would not pose disproportionately high or adverse impacts on children s environmental health or safety. Orbital and Reentry Debris (EA , pages ): NASA or other user entities would ensure that Notices to Mariners and Notices to Airmen were provided prior to any launch (for the launch area and downrange zones) to minimize risks to aircraft and surface vessels. During atmospheric reentry, the majority of spacecraft and spent launch vehicle debris would burn up because of aerodynamic heating. Any debris surviving reentry would most likely impact in the ocean. Procedural requirements and standards applied to each mission would limit the risk of human casualty from reentry debris to 1 in 10,000 and require that missions be designed to assure that domestic and foreign landmasses be avoided in both controlled and uncontrolled reentries. Thus, the risk for an individual to be hit and injured from reentering debris would be extremely low. Aesthetics (EA , pages ): Because the Proposed Action locations are in industrialized areas, the visual sensitivity is low. Therefore, the Proposed Action is not expected to have significant impacts related to aesthetics. PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT: USAF published a Notice of Availability for public review of the NASA Final EA and USAF Draft FONSI in the Florida Today newspaper on or about May 18, 2017, initiating a 30-day review period. During this time, USAF placed copies of the Final EA and Draft FONSI in local libraries and on the Internet at POINT OF CONTACT: The point of contact for questions, issues, and information relevant to USAF s intent to adopt the NASA Final EA for launch of the STP-2 mission and other reasonably expected future USAF space launch missions is Ms. Jecely Torres-Ramos, SMC/ENC, 483 North Aviation Boulevard, El FONSI-4
5 Segundo, CA, Ms. Torres-Ramos also can be reached by calling (310) or by at CONCLUSION: USAF has independently reviewed the 2013 NASA Final EA and determined it satisfies USAF regulations for implementing NEPA. Because the USAF s Proposed Action would fit within the bounds of the actions and resulting environmental effects identified in the NASA Final EA, supplementation of the EA is not required. Based upon a review of current information, and the facts and analysis contained in the EA, USAF finds the Proposed Action for use of the LC-39 complexes at KSC to process launch vehicles and conduct space launches would not have a significant impact on the natural or human environment, either by itself or cumulatively with other actions. After thoroughly considering the facts herein, the undersigned finds that the Proposed Action would be consistent with existing environmental policies and objectives set forth in NEPA and its implementing regulations. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. APPROVED: MICHELLE A. LINN, GS-15, DAFC Chief, Engineer Division Command Civil Engineer DATE FONSI-5
Updates on FAA Order F. Agenda. Communicate FAA Order Updates. Educate attendees on the changes to FAA Order
Updates on FAA Order 1050.1F Rhonda Solomon March 3, 2015 Airports Conference 2015 Agenda Communicate FAA Order 1050.1 Updates Educate attendees on the changes to FAA Order 1050.1 1 1 Overview of NEPA
More informationFinal Supplemental Environmental Assessment
Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment Boost-Back and Landing of the Falcon 9 Full Thrust First Stage at Iridium Landing Area Vandenberg Air Force Base, California and Offshore Landing Contingency
More informationSPACE LAUNCH AUTOMATION AND INTEGRATION: A COMMON ARCHITECTURE FOR MISSION ASSURANCE, SAFETY, AND LAUNCH OPERATIONS
SPACE LAUNCH AUTOMATION AND INTEGRATION: A COMMON ARCHITECTURE FOR MISSION ASSURANCE, SAFETY, AND LAUNCH OPERATIONS O. Rusty Powell Millennium Engineering and Integration Company, rpowell@meicompany.com
More informationDRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR THE MISSILE TRANSFER FACILITY F. E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR THE MISSILE TRANSFER FACILITY AT F. E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING December 2017 Prepared by: 90 CES/CEIEC Francis E. Warren AFB, Wyoming Point of Contact: Mr.
More informationThe Role and Use of Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements And Environmental Assessments in Fulfilling NEPA and State Environmental Mandates
The Role and Use of Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements And Environmental Assessments in Fulfilling NEPA and State Environmental Mandates by James R. Park U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville,
More informationSafety Framework for Nuclear Power Source Applications in Outer Space
Safety Framework for Nuclear Power Source Applications in Outer Space NASA/ESA/ASI/JPL The IAEA Safety Glossary clarifies and harmonizes terminology and usage in the IAEA safety standards. To this end,
More informationFINAL. Prepared For. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Hawthorne, California and 45th Space Wing Patrick Air Force Base, Florida
FINAL Supplemental Environmental Assessment to the December 2014 EA for Space Exploration Technologies Vertical Landing of the Falcon Vehicle and Construction at Launch Complex 13 at Cape Canaveral Air
More information7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES This section provides a description of the developed remedial alternatives based on viable remedial technologies and process options, as identified in Section 4.0,
More informationProject Overview. Northwest Innovation Works LLC and the Port of Kalama propose to develop and operate
Project Overview Northwest Innovation Works LLC and the Port of Kalama propose to develop and operate a natural gas-tomethanol production plant and storage facilities, and a new marine terminal, in the
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER 45TH SPACE WING 45TH SPACE WING INSTRUCTION 91-101 25 APRIL 2016 Certified Current, 1 December 2016 Safety PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT (PSM) PLAN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION
More informationChapter 3.8. Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice
Chapter. Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice NWSTF BOARDMAN DRAFT EIS AUGUST 0 This Page Intentionally Left Blank CHAPTER. SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE NWSTF BOARDMAN DRAFT EIS AUGUST
More informationCHAPTER 12 THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION PURPOSE APPLICABILITY
CHAPTER 12 THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) PARAGRAPH PAGE SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION PURPOSE... 12100 12-2 APPLICABILITY... 12101 12-2 BACKGROUND... 12102 12-2 FEDERAL STATUTES... 12103 12-2
More informationAPPENDIX F. SECTION 404(B)(1) EVALUATION SHORT VERSION. Herbert Hoover Dike Dam Safety Modification Study
Appendix F Section 404(b)(1) APPENDI F. SECTION 404(B)(1) EVALUATION SHORT VERSION Herbert Hoover Dike Dam Safety Modification Study HHD Dam Safety Modification Study EIS June 2016 E i Appendix F Section
More informationOctober 19, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #4 Overview of Environmental Effects
Lake Elmo Airport Environmental Assessment (EA)/ Environmental Assessment (EAW) Worksheet October 19, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #4 Overview of Environmental Effects Agenda Public Event #2
More informationMissile Defense Agency Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS)
Missile Defense Agency Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement January 2007 VOLUME 1 FINAL BMDS PEIS Department of Defense Missile Defense Agency 7100 Defense
More informationNEPA OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS Environmental Law Workshop Loyola Law School/Sierra Club Angeles Chapter
NEPA OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS 2010 Environmental Law Workshop Loyola Law School/Sierra Club Angeles Chapter Summary 1. OVERVIEW OF STATUTE 2. COMPARISONS TO CEQA 3. DISCUSSION OF NEPA AND GHG s CASE LAW RECENT
More informationDRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMARY
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMARY Proposed Leasing of Lands at Fort Bliss, Texas for the Proposed Siting, Construction, and Operation by the City of El Paso of a Brackish Water Desalination
More informationMISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION Project Title: AN/TPY-2 Radar Deployment at the Ted Stevens Marine Research Institute (TSMRI) on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
More informationPUBLIC SCOPING MEETING AGENDA
PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING AGENDA MANATEE HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS Integrated Feasibility Study & Environmental Impact Statement Opening Poster Session 1 Presentation Poster Session 2 Presentation Adjourn
More informationAIRBORNE LASER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
AIRBORNE LASER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA AGENCY: ACTION: Missile Defense Agency Finding of No Significant Impact BACKGROUND: The attached Environmental
More informationFrequently Asked Questions
North Wake Landfill Q1. Where is the North Wake Landfill located? The North Wake Landfill is located at 9300 Deponie Drive, off of Durant Road in north Raleigh, between Falls of Neuse Road and Capital
More informationDepartment of Defense MANUAL
Department of Defense MANUAL NUMBER 4140.01, Volume 1 February 10, 2014 Incorporating Change 1, November 27, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Procedures: Operational Requirements
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Date: September 19, 2017 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT To: Agencies and Interested Parties Lead Agency: Sacramento Municipal Utility District 6201 S Street, MS B203 Sacramento,
More informationIdaho National Laboratory, 1955 Fremont Ave, Idaho Falls, ID Glenn Research Center, Brookpark Rd, Cleveland, OH 44135
The 2014 NASA Nuclear Power Assessment Study: Assembly, Test and Launch Operations Comparisons between a Notional 1 kwe Fission Power System and a Conventional Radioisotope Power System Stephen G. Johnson
More informationPeterson Air Force Base
FELSBURG H O LT & ULLE VI G December 2012 Peterson Air Force Base Draft Environmental Assessment: Base Wide Comprehensive Transportation Plan 2012 PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE BASE WIDE COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION
More informationDraft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements
JUNE 2016 RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements PREPARED BY: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. IN
More informationPROPOSED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE MINUTEMAN III PROPULSION REPLACEMENT PROGRAM HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH. August 2001.
URSCN: H5-F0002793.15 PROPOSED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE MINUTEMAN III PROPULSION REPLACEMENT PROGRAM HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH August 2001 Prepared for: Ms. Kay Winn OO-ALC/EMP 7274 Wardleigh
More informationPortbury Dock Renewable Energy Plant. Cumulative Impact Assessment Non-Technical Summary September 2009
Portbury Dock Renewable Energy Plant Cumulative Impact Assessment Non-Technical Summary September 2009 INTRODUCTION On 28 th August 2009 E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Developments Limited (EC&R) submitted
More information& New Mexico. Final. December Prepared For: HQ, US Army Garrison, Fort Bliss ATTN: IMBL-ZA 1741 Marshall Road Fort Bliss, TX 79916
Final & New Mexico Photo Credit: US Army Prepared For: HQ, US Army Garrison, Fort Bliss ATTN: IMBL-ZA 1741 Marshall Road Fort Bliss, TX 79916 Prepared By: United States Army Environmental Command and Directorate
More informationSpace Safety and Space Traffic Management IISL-ECSL Symposium Space Law Symposium 2015 Vienna 13 April 2015
Space Safety and Space Traffic Management IISL-ECSL Symposium Space Law Symposium 2015 Vienna 13 April 2015 By Isabelle Rongier - IAASS President Tommaso Sgobba IAASS Executive Director International Association
More informationNavigating the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Process
Navigating the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Process Angela Ryan Biologist Tampa Permits Section May 16, 2012 US Army Corps of Engineers JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT Regulatory Mission To protect the
More informationSAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER
Decision Notice And Finding of No Significant Impact Watershed and Fisheries Conservation Treatments SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Public Lands Center Rio
More informationPublic Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:
Public Notice Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF- 2014-00151 Date: April 18, 2014 The purpose of this public notice is to inform you of a proposal for work in which you might be interested. It
More informationWe can attract new business
L a u n c h i n g Advanced Energy» Business Investment» Regional Growth» opport We can attract new business High-tech companies, university research partnerships, public and private contractors, federal
More informationSmall Satellite Rideshares on Commercial Resupply Missions to the International Space Station
SSC12-V-2 Small Satellite Rideshares on Commercial Resupply Missions to the International Space Station Joshua R. Robinson and Daniel W. Kwon Orbital Sciences Corporation 45101 Warp Drive Dulles, VA 20166
More informationCOST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS. Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Activities. USDA Forest Service
December 7, 2005 COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Activities USDA Forest Service COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration
More informationClifton Marsh Landfill Variation of planning permission 05/09/0376 & 06/09/0395 for the continuation of landfilling until Non Technical Summary
Clifton Marsh Landfill Variation of planning permission 05/09/0376 & 06/09/0395 for the continuation of landfilling until 2035 Non Technical Summary SLR Consulting Limited Project Ref: 403.00079.00474
More informationMOBILE SENSORS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
MOBILE SENSORS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY: ACTION: Missile Defense Agency Finding of No Significant Impact BACKGROUND: The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA)
More informationMissile Defense Agency Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) Sea-Based X-Band (SBX) Radar Placement and Operation Adak, Alaska
Missile Defense Agency Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) Sea-Based X-Band (SBX) Radar Placement and Operation Adak, Alaska Environmental Assessment October 2005 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for
More informationDistribution Restriction Statement
CECW-A Engineer Regulation 1165-2-501 Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 ER 1165-2-501 30 September 1999 Water Resources Policies and Authorities CIVIL WORKS
More information4.13 POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, AND HOUSING; GROWTH INDUCEMENT; AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
4.13 POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, AND HOUSING; GROWTH INDUCEMENT; AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE This section describes the existing and projected demographics of the project area and analyzes the LWRP 2020 Plan
More informationSecondary Launch Services and Payload Hosting Aboard the Falcon and Dragon Product Lines
Secondary Launch Services and Payload Hosting Aboard the Falcon and Dragon Product Lines Dustin Doud, Brian Bjelde, Christian Melbostad, Lauren Dreyer Space Exploration Technologies Corp. 1 Rocket Road,
More information4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES. Negative or adverse impacts during the construction phase are:
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4.1.1 Impacts during Construction Phase Negative or adverse impacts during the construction phase are: Land environment:
More informationDetermining Whether a Proposal is Subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Section 102 Updated March
Determining Whether a Proposal is Subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Section 102 Updated March 2005 1 This paper presents some key thresholds to consider when determining whether a
More informationRESOLUTION NO.15- The Planning Commission of the City of La Habra does hereby resolve as follows:
RESOLUTION NO.15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA CERTIFYING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 14-02 FOR A 32 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
More informationInformation on the focal point for the Convention. Information on the point of contact for the Convention
Questionnaire for the REPORT OF MONTENEGRO ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN A TRANSBOUNDARY CONTEXT in the period 2006 2009 Information on the focal point for
More informationCOMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES
COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES 0 0. Introduction This chapter compares the proposed Project to the six alternatives identified in Chapter, Project Description. Both CEQA and NEPA require analysis of a reasonable
More informationNYSDOT Project Development Manual (PDM)
Company LOGO NYSDOT Project Development Manual (PDM) Overview of NYSDOT Project Development Process January 24, 2006 Farhan F. Haddad, P.E. Design Quality Assurance Bureau Project Development Manual
More informationEuropean Perspectives
European Perspectives This new regular section looks at emerging issues with a definite pan-european focus and high significance for transport and/or infrastructure research. Three general inter-related
More informationAppendix H Traffic Study
Appendix H Traffic Study Appendix I Description of Units Appendix J Responses to Comments RESPONSES
More informationElon Musk, CEO & CTO Customer:
I. Program Overview Name of Program: SpaceX Falcon 1 Flight 4 Your Name/title: Elon Musk, CEO & CTO Customer: SpaceX Falcon 1 Demonstration Flight Program Category o Sub-System R&D/SDD program or project
More informationFinal Environmental Assessment Falcon 9 and Falcon 9 Heavy Launch Vehicle Programs from Space Launch Complex 4 East
Final Environmental Assessment Falcon 9 and Falcon 9 Heavy Launch Vehicle Programs from Space Launch Complex 4 East Vandenberg Air Force Base California 1 March 2011 Report Documentation Page Form Approved
More information6 Risk assessment methodology
Risk assessment methodology 6 Risk assessment methodology 6.1 Introduction INPEX has committed to a systematic risk assessment process as a means of achieving best practice in environmental management
More informationDraft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan
Draft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan USDA Forest Service Aspen-Sopris Ranger District, White River National Forest Gunnison Ranger District, Grand
More information40 CFR - Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40: Protection of Environment
40 CFR - Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40: Protection of Environment TITLE 40 - PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER I - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY SUBCHAPTER I - SOLID WASTES PART 270 - EPA ADMINISTERED
More informationEnvironmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures
First page header CHAPTER 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Sections 4.1 through 4.13 of Chapter 4 of this EIR contain a discussion
More informationNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Jeff Wade Center for Governmental Responsibility University of Florida Levin College of Law The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) first significant,
More informationThe existing land use surrounding North Perry Airport can be described as follows:
7.1 INTRODUCTION This land use evaluation will accomplish the following: Identify existing and future land uses in the Airport environs; Document existing land use, future land use, and zoning around the
More informationInglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Environmental Impact Report Public Information Meetings
Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Environmental Impact Report Public Information Meetings Tuesday, October 24, 2017 6:30 to 8:00 PM El Rincon Elementary School 11177 Overland Avenue Monday, October
More informationDraft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR DIVERT ACTIVITIES AND EXERCISES, GUAM AND COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
Draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR DIVERT ACTIVITIES AND EXERCISES, GUAM AND COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS J UNE 202 Privacy Advisory Public comments on this Draft EIS are requested
More informationExcerpt of Thermal Power Guidelines for New Plants
Excerpt of Thermal Power Guidelines for New Plants The following is an excerpt of the Thermal Power guidelines for New Plants, a complete version of which is found in the Pollution Prevention and Abatement
More information47.0 GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICE STACK HEIGHT
47.0 GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICE STACK HEIGHT 47.1 General Provisions A. This section provides that the degree of emission limitation required of any source for control of any air pollutant must not be affected
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LIQUID PROPELLANT TARGETS AT WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW MEXICO
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LIQUID PROPELLANT TARGETS AT WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, NEW MEXICO AGENCY: ACTION: Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Finding of No Significant Impact BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Council
More informationEnvironmental Assessment MCAS Cherry Point Range Operations
January 2009 Environmental Assessment MCAS Cherry Point Range Operations MCAS Cherry Point, North Carolina Action Proponent: MCAS Cherry Point THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
More informationVoluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program (AC 00-56)
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program (AC 00-56) FY 2004 Audit Report Prepared by Aircraft Certification Service & Flight
More informationResponse to Comments of Don and Tricia Nevis (Letter I25) See the master response to Public Outreach Process.
Freeport Regional Water Authority and the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Chapter 8. Responses to Comments from Individuals Don and Tricia Nevis (I25) Response to Comments of Don
More information6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STATUS TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Chapter 6 Air Quality 6.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents a project-level analysis of the potential for air quality impacts that could result from mobile and stationary sources of air emissions generated
More information130A-294. Solid waste management program.
130A-294. Solid waste management program. (a) The Department is authorized and directed to engage in research, conduct investigations and surveys, make inspections and establish a statewide solid waste
More informationCEQA BASICS. The California Environmental Quality Act. Prepared for: Orange County Department of Education. Prepared by:
The California Environmental Quality Act CEQA BASICS Prepared for: Orange County Department of Education Prepared by: Contact: DWAYNE MEARS, AICP Principal 714.966.9220 dmears@planningcenter.com The Beginning
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
p-ear2-44b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED RANDY S SANITATION TRANSFER FACILITY PROPOSED
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
p-ear2-59b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED HEARTLAND HUTTERIAN BRETHREN, INC. FEEDLOT
More informationFactor Potential Effects Mitigation Measures
Natural Environment No impacts of provincial significance to the natural environment are anticipated for the rapid transit project. Other impacts and how they will be mitigated are outlined in the table
More informationDefense Logistics Agency REGULATION
Defense Logistics Agency REGULATION DLAR 1000.22 Effective December 2, 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS IN DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ACTIONS Subpart A - Introduction Section 1 Purpose. a. This part implements
More information5.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 INTRODUCTION GENERAL CEQA REQUIREMENTS California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15126.6(a) states an EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to
More informationScoping & Concept of Operations (ConOps) Module
Scoping & Concept of Operations (ConOps) Module Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 Space Systems Engineering: Scoping & ConOps Module Module Purpose: Scoping & ConOps To understand the importance of
More informationINTRODUCTION. 1 Proposed Plan for the Former Lee Field Naval Air Station Landfill Area 2 Site
1 Proposed Plan for the Former Lee Field Naval Air Station Landfill Area 2 Site U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District Formerly Used Defense Site Program PROPOSED PLAN for the LANDFILL AREA
More informationDRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE UH-1N AIRCRAFT F. E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE UH-1N AIRCRAFT AT F. E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING 07 JANUARY 2017 Prepared by: 90 CES/CEIEC Francis E. Warren AFB, Wyoming Point of Contact:
More informationTHE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Regulatory Branch THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY AUTHORITY IS BASED UPON 1. SECTION 10 OF THE RIVERS AND HARBORS ACT OF 1899 (RHA) AND 2. SECTION 404 OF THE
More informationGuidelines for Preparing an Alternatives Analysis
Policy Number: Policy No. 2017-01 Title: Guidelines for Preparing an Alternatives Analysis Effective Date: September 7, 2017 Authority: Policy: Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., Sections 3.1, 3.4(2),
More informationGENERAL PRESENTATION OF YUZHNOYE SDO ACTIVITIES IN ROCKET SPACE DOMAIN
GENERAL PRESENTATION OF YUZHNOYE SDO ACTIVITIES IN ROCKET SPACE DOMAIN Yuzhnoye State Design Office named after M.K.Yangel was founded in 1954 to initiate development of strategicpurpose missile-weapon
More informationReview and Assessment of Reusable Booster System for USAF Space Command
Review and Assessment of Reusable Booster System for USAF Space Command Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Committee Chair: David Van Wie Review and Assessment of RBS Tasking and Committee Membership
More informationEnvironmental Awareness Training
Environmental Awareness Training Issued by: Environmental Branch Code 1023 July 2017 Administrative or Operational Use as determined 08 July2015. Other requests shall be referred to Public Affairs Officer
More informationADOPTION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE A PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ CAMPUS I. ADOPTION OF THE
More informationCement Plant Development Project in the Territory of Port-Daniel-Gascons
Cement Plant Development Project in the Territory of Port-Daniel-Gascons UPDATE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REPERCUSSIONS STUDY Consolidated document for public distribution including the original report and
More informationWater Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the Ute Mountain Ute Reservation
Ute Mountain Ute Tribe Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the Ute Mountain Ute Reservation Appendix C Anti-Degradation Implementation Policy 1. INTRODUCTION Section 301 of the Clean Water Act
More informationChemical Waste Management, Inc. Emelle, Alabama EPA I.D. Number ALD FACT SHEET
Chemical Waste Management, Inc. Emelle, Alabama EPA I.D. Number ALD 000622464 FACT SHEET A draft Alabama Hazardous Wastes Management and Minimization Act (AHWMMA) variance has been prepared for the Chemical
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISPOSAL CORE PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES, UNIVERSAL WASTES, AND USED OIL
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISPOSAL CORE PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES, UNIVERSAL WASTES, AND USED OIL February 21, 2000 Prepared for State of Tennessee Department of Transportation
More informationAppendix D. Living Marine Resources Program Ocean Observing System Notification Procedures
Appendix D Living Marine Resources Program Ocean Observing System Notification Procedures All LMR funded activities must comply with the Ocean Observing System (OOS) Handling Procedures in Enclosure 1
More informationREPORT OF SURVEY CONDUCTED AT NASA KENNEDY SPACE CENTER CAPE CANAVERAL, FL OCTOBER 1996
REPORT OF SURVEY CONDUCTED AT NASA KENNEDY SPACE CENTER CAPE CANAVERAL, FL OCTOBER 1996 Best Manufacturing Practices BEST MANUFACTURING PRACTICES CENTER OF EXCELLENCE College Park, Maryland F o r e w o
More informationCarriage of Dangerous Goods and Harmful Substances
MANX SHIPPING NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MSN 056 Issued 01 August 2015 Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Harmful Substances This Notice provides information on Isle of Man Regulations which
More informationCanaveral Port Authority: Rail Extension Update
Rail Extension Update Canaveral Port Authority: Rail Extension Update Thursday, April 30, 2015 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. Port Canaveral Maritime Center John Walsh CEO, Canaveral Port Authority Jim Dubea Speakers
More informationFree Response 2000 #4 human population age structure diagram 2003 #2 human population growth rate (calculations)
APES Main Chapters to Review C.4 Human population Multiple Choice 1998 # 8 stable population # 36, 37, 38 population growth rate # 51, 52 population pyramid # 56 population impact # 62 population size
More informationFAQ. Lady Elliot Island Eco Resort Carbon Offset Program FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
FAQ Lady Elliot Island Eco Resort Carbon Offset Program FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS WHERE IS THE $2 OFFSET GOING? We, Lady Elliot Island Eco Resort (LEIER), request our guests donate $2 per person to help
More informationISO Environmental Management System Manual
Corresponding Requirements: ISO Standard / EMS Manual: 4.4.4 City of Gastonia Wastewater Treatment Division ISO 14001 - Environmental Management System Manual Prepared By: Beth Eckert, Industrial Chemist
More informationEnvironmental Management System Integrated Pollution Control. Origination Date 1 st February Area: The Group
Environmental Management System Integrated Pollution Control Document No. 5.2.1 Version no. 1 Origination Date 1 st February 2017 Area: The Group Approval: Group Services & Facilities Last Revision Date
More informationYes: Y No: N (a) (b) (c) (d) (a) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Checklist: 3. Hydropower Stations, Dams and Reservoirs (1) 1 Permits and Explanation 2 Pollution Control (1) EIA and Permits (2) Explanation to the Local Stakeholders Main Check s Have EIA reports been
More informationBerths [Everport] Container Terminal Improvements Project Draft EIS/EIR Public Meeting
Berths 226-236 [Everport] Container Terminal Improvements Project Draft EIS/EIR Public Meeting U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles Harbor Department May 10, 2017 Opening Remarks Agenda Christopher
More informationNeighborhood Advisory Committee. EIR Process Overview. Chapman University April 20, 2016
Neighborhood Advisory Committee EIR Process Overview Chapman University April 20, 2016 2 What is CEQA? California Environmental Quality Act (1970) Modeled after NEPA, but more stringent CEQA applies to
More informationWind Energy Development Specialist Report
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southwestern Region Cibola National Forest and National Grasslands Wind Energy Development Specialist Report Kiowa, Rita Blanca, Black Kettle and
More informationTIER 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. 7. Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies
TIER 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 7. Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies Table of Contents Chapter 7 7 Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences,
More information