ModernThink 2016 Great Colleges Survey The University of Virginia's College at Wise Response Distribution Report

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ModernThink 2016 Great Colleges Survey The University of Virginia's College at Wise Response Distribution Report"

Transcription

1 / Average All Statements (1-66) Your Overall (233) % 38.7% 20.8% 6.5%4.3% Administration (33) % 38.9% 18.8% 5.8%2.3% Faculty (64) % 33.2% 16.4% 5.7%3.8% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 40.7% 20.7% 4.6%3.2% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 40.6% 24.8% 7.5% 5.8% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 42.2% 24.2% 7.5% 5.3% 1. My job makes good use of my skills and abilities. Your Overall (233) % 42.9% 10.7% 2.6%1.3% Administration (33) % 45.5% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 1.6%1.6%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 52.6% 0%5.3%5.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 21.1% 2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 51.7% 13.8% 5.2%0%

2 / 2. I am given the responsibility and freedom to do my job. Your Overall (233) % 32.2% 6.4%0.9%0.9% Administration (33) % 15.2% 6.1%0%0% Faculty (64) % 18.8% 3.1%0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 47.4% 5.3%2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 37.9% 10.3% 1.7%0% 3. My supervisor/department chair makes his/her expectations clear. Your Overall (233) % 32.6% 14.6% 4.7%3.9% Administration (33) % 27.3% 6.1% 9.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 25% 6.3%1.6%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 52.6% 10.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 36.8% 26.3% 0% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 37.9% 19% 10.3% 3.4%

3 / 4. I am provided the resources I need to be effective in my job. Your Overall (233) % 42.1% 23.2% 5.2%3.9% Administration (33) % 33.3% 27.3% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) % 39.1% 20.3% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3% 10.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 52.6% 23.7% 2.6% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 46.6% 27.6% 3.4%3.4% 5. I understand how my job contributes to this institution's mission. Your Overall (233) % 36.5% 7.3% 1.7%0% Administration (33) % 27.3% 3%3%0% Faculty (64) % 15.6% 10.9% 0%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 7.9% 5.3%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 53.4% 3.4%1.7%0%

4 / 6. I am given the opportunity to develop my skills at this institution. Your Overall (231) % 40.7% 12.6% 3.9%1.3% Administration (33) % 39.4% 6.1%6.1%0% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 7.8% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 36.8% 21.1% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 56.1% 14% 1.8%0% 7. I receive feedback from my supervisor/department chair that helps me. Your Overall (233) % 37.3% 16.7% 6% 5.2% Administration (33) % 45.5% 12.1% 3%3% Faculty (64) % 29.7% 12.5% 4.7%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 36.8% 15.8% 10.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 39.7% 24.1% 8.6% 5.2%

5 / 8. When I offer a new idea, I believe it will be fully considered. Your Overall (229) % 38% 17.9% 5.7%4.8% Administration (33) % 42.4% 15.2% 3%3% Faculty (64) % 32.8% 10.9% 1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 35.3% 17.6% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 46.4% 25% 14.3% 1.8% 9. I am regularly recognized for my contributions. Your Overall (231) % 27.3% 30.7% 11.7% 6.1% Administration (32) % 31.3% 25% 6.3%3.1% Faculty (64) % 29.7% 23.4% 9.4% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 33.3% 5.6% 27.8% 5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 23.7% 39.5% 7.9% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 27.6% 32.8% 13.8% 5.2%

6 / 10. I understand the necessary requirements to advance my career. Your Overall (222) % 42.3% 18.5% 6.3%5.4% Administration (32) % 40.6% 25% 0%3.1% Faculty (63) % 34.9% 15.9% 1.6%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 47.1% 11.8% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) % 41.7% 19.4% 13.9% 5.6% Non-exempt Staff (55) % 49.1% 20% 7.3% 7.3% 11. I am paid fairly for my work. Your Overall (231) % 34.6% 20.3% 16% 13% Administration (33) % 33.3% 15.2% 12.1% 6.1% Faculty (64) % 43.8% 20.3% 9.4% 7.8% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 21.1% 10.5% 5.3% 31.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 28.9% 15.8% 31.6% 18.4% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 34.5% 24.1% 17.2% 17.2%

7 / 12. I believe what I am told by my supervisor/department chair. Your Overall (230) % 30% 13.9% 4.8%3.9% Administration (33) % 30.3% 15.2% 3%0% Faculty (63) % 17.5% 6.3%4.8%3.2% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 42.1% 5.3%5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 23.7% 26.3% 2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 43.1% 15.5% 5.2% 8.6% 13. We have opportunities to contribute to important decisions in my department. Your Overall (227) % 33.9% 20.7% 6.2%4.4% Administration (33) % 39.4% 15.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 29.7% 10.9% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 16.7% 16.7% 11.1% 11.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 28.9% 28.9% 5.3% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (55) % 43.6% 27.3% 7.3% 7.3%

8 / 14. I can speak up or challenge a traditional way of doing something without fear of harming my career. Your Overall (226) % 31.4% 21.2% 6.2%5.3% Administration (33) % 33.3% 18.2% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) % 20.3% 18.8% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 37.5% 18.8% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 23.7% 2.6% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 28.6% 26.8% 10.7% 10.7% 15. My supervisor/department chair regularly models this institution's values. Your Overall (229) % 35.8% 11.8% 4.8%5.7% Administration (33) % 30.3% 9.1% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) % 26.6% 6.3%4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 31.6% 31.6% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 50.9% 8.8% 5.3% 12.3%

9 / 16. Promotions in my department are based on a person's ability. Your Overall (206) % 30.6% 25.2% 10.2% 11.2% Administration (31) % 32.3% 12.9% 12.9% 3.2% Faculty (62) % 35.5% 17.7% 6.5%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (14) % 42.9% 42.9% 0%7.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (32) % 31.3% 31.3% 9.4% 18.8% Non-exempt Staff (50) % 22% 30% 14% 22% 17. Our review process accurately measures my job performance. Your Overall (221) % 37.6% 22.6% 11.3% 9% Administration (33) % 45.5% 15.2% 12.1% 3% Faculty (62) % 40.3% 14.5% 8.1% 8.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 29.4% 35.3% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 35.1% 40.5% 0% 10.8% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 39.3% 14.3% 23.2% 14.3%

10 / 18. Issues of low performance are addressed in my department. Your Overall (210) % 29.5% 23.8% 14.8% 14.3% Administration (31) % 45.2% 19.4% 6.5%6.5% Faculty (59) % 32.2% 20.3% 11.9% 13.6% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 13.3% 40% 6.7% 13.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) % 29.4% 17.6% 26.5% 11.8% Non-exempt Staff (53) % 26.4% 32.1% 17% 18.9% 19. My supervisor/department chair is consistent and fair. Your Overall (230) % 33.9% 15.7% 3.5%5.7% Administration (33) % 42.4% 9.1% 3%3% Faculty (64) % 25% 9.4% 1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 42.1% 15.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 39.5% 23.7% 2.6%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 37.9% 19% 5.2% 12.1%

11 / 20. My supervisor/department chair actively solicits my suggestions and ideas. Your Overall (229) % 31.4% 19.2% 3.1%4.8% Administration (33) % 36.4% 21.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 23.4% 10.9% 1.6%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 26.3% 26.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 26.3% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 35.7% 21.4% 7.1% 10.7% 21. In my department, we communicate openly about issues that impact each other's work. Your Overall (229) % 38% 24.5% 5.7%5.7% Administration (33) % 36.4% 24.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 12.5% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 38.9% 22.2% 5.6%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 28.9% 7.9% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 37.9% 31% 8.6% 12.1%

12 / 22. Changes that affect me are discussed prior to being implemented. Your Overall (226) % 36.7% 26.5% 7.5% 8.8% Administration (33) % 33.3% 33.3% 6.1%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 15.6% 3.1%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 52.9% 5.9%0% 11.8% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 28.9% 36.8% 7.9% 15.8% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 32.1% 33.9% 14.3% 12.5% 23. People in my department work well together. Your Overall (228) % 36.8% 19.3% 4.8%4.4% Administration (33) % 30.3% 21.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 12.5% 3.1%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 47.1% 23.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 39.5% 26.3% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 39.7% 22.4% 8.6% 6.9%

13 / 24. I have a good relationship with my supervisor/department chair. Your Overall (230) % 34.3% 11.7% 2.6%2.2% Administration (33) % 33.3% 6.1%0%3% Faculty (64) % 23.4% 6.3%0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 15.8% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 41.4% 19% 8.6% 0% 25. Overall, my department is a good place to work. Your Overall (230) % 34.3% 14.3% 2.2%0.9% Administration (33) % 33.3% 9.1% 0%3% Faculty (64) % 18.8% 15.6% 0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 36.8% 13.2% 5.3%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 48.3% 17.2% 3.4%0%

14 / 26. I can count on people to cooperate across departments. Your Overall (222) % 40.1% 32.9% 8.6% 5% Administration (33) % 27.3% 48.5% 0%3% Faculty (63) % 39.7% 25.4% 7.9% 4.8% Adjunct Faculty (13) % 61.5% 15.4% 7.7% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 36.8% 15.8% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 40.4% 35.1% 10.5% 5.3% 27. Senior leadership provides a clear direction for this institution's future. Your Overall (226) % 36.7% 27.4% 6.2%4.4% Administration (33) % 39.4% 18.2% 12.1% 6.1% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 21.9% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 25% 43.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 31.6% 7.9% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 38.6% 36.8% 3.5%3.5%

15 / 28. My department has adequate faculty/staff to achieve our goals. Your Overall (229) % 28.8% 26.6% 21.8% 14.4% Administration (33) % 24.2% 27.3% 30.3% 6.1% Faculty (64) % 21.9% 20.3% 25% 23.4% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 22.2% 22.2% 27.8% 11.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 26.3% 36.8% 21.1% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 36.2% 25.9% 17.2% 12.1% 29. The institution takes reasonable steps to provide a safe and secure environment for the campus. Your Overall (229) % 49.8% 8.3% 0.9%1.7% Administration (33) % 54.5% 9.1% 0%0% Faculty (63) % 46% 6.3%3.2%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 36.8% 5.3%0%5.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 52.6% 7.9% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 53.4% 12.1% 0%3.4%

16 / 30. Our orientation program prepares new faculty, administration and staff to be effective. Your Overall (213) % 35.7% 30.5% 11.3% 9.9% Administration (33) % 21.2% 24.2% 36.4% 9.1% Faculty (60) % 40% 31.7% 3.3% 8.3% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 46.7% 6.7%6.7%6.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) % 36.1% 38.9% 11.1% 8.3% Non-exempt Staff (54) % 35.2% 29.6% 9.3% 13% 31. The facilities (e.g., classrooms, offices, laboratories) adequately meet my needs. Your Overall (200) % 45.5% 28.5% 7.5% 3% Administration (32) % 43.8% 28.1% 3.1%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 31.3% 7.8% 3.1% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 43.8% 37.5% 0% 12.5% Exempt Prof'l Staff (31) % 51.6% 22.6% 12.9% 3.2% Non-exempt Staff (44) % 52.3% 29.5% 9.1% 0%

17 / 32. Our senior leadership has the knowledge, skills and experience necessary for institutional success. Your Overall (224) % 45.1% 18.3% 5.8%1.8% Administration (33) % 39.4% 9.1% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 37.5% 12.5% 7.8% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 61.1% 5.6%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 44.7% 28.9% 5.3%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (55) % 43.6% 30.9% 1.8%1.8% 33. There is a good balance of teaching, service and research at this institution. Your Overall (198) % 54.5% 18.2% 6.6%2% Administration (32) % 59.4% 18.8% 6.3%0% Faculty (64) % 43.8% 14.1% 9.4% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 52.9% 23.5% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (31) % 58.1% 25.8% 6.5%0% Non-exempt Staff (39) % 66.7% 12.8% 2.6%0%

18 / 34. This institution's benefits meet my needs. Your Overall (217) % 41% 24.9% 7.8% 6.5% Administration (33) % 45.5% 21.2% 3%3% Faculty (64) % 32.8% 26.6% 10.9% 6.3% Adjunct Faculty (11) % 54.5% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 28.9% 10.5% 2.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 44.6% 21.4% 7.1% 10.7% 35. Our recognition and awards programs are meaningful to me. Your Overall (207) % 30.9% 29% 15.5% 8.2% Administration (31) % 41.9% 19.4% 16.1% 3.2% Faculty (62) % 27.4% 24.2% 11.3% 9.7% Adjunct Faculty (13) % 30.8% 23.1% 23.1% 7.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) % 26.5% 38.2% 17.6% 11.8% Non-exempt Staff (52) % 34.6% 32.7% 13.5% 7.7%

19 / 36. I am proud to be part of this institution. Your Overall (227) % 32.6% 13.2% 1.3%0% Administration (33) % 21.2% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 15.6% 3.1%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 42.1% 10.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 39.5% 15.8% 2.6%0% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 33.3% 10.5% 0%0% 37. Senior leadership shows a genuine interest in the well-being of faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (225) % 39.1% 20.9% 6.2%6.2% Administration (33) % 39.4% 21.2% 3%6.1% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 14.1% 7.8% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 29.4% 35.3% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 50% 21.1% 5.3% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 42.1% 26.3% 5.3% 7%

20 / 38. The role of faculty in shared governance is clearly stated and publicized. Your Overall (175) % 42.9% 25.1% 6.9%0.6% Administration (30) % 43.3% 23.3% 3.3%3.3% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 18.8% 4.7%0% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 52.9% 17.6% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (24) % 37.5% 45.8% 8.3% 0% Non-exempt Staff (28) % 39.3% 35.7% 10.7% 0% 39. Faculty are appropriately involved in decisions related to the education program (e.g., curriculum development, evaluation). Your Overall (150) % 46% 16.7% 3.3%0.7% Administration (26) % 46.2% 7.7% 7.7% 0% Faculty (64) % 42.2% 9.4% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 41.2% 23.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (14) % 35.7% 50% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (20) % 60% 25% 0%0%

21 / 40. Teaching is appropriately recognized in the evaluation and promotion process. Your Overall (140) % 44.3% 19.3% 6.4%0% Administration (23) % 39.1% 13% 4.3%0% Faculty (62) % 33.9% 19.4% 11.3% 0% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 66.7% 20% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (12) % 33.3% 41.7% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (18) % 66.7% 11.1% 5.6%0% 41. Senior leadership communicates openly about important matters. Your Overall (221) % 32.6% 33% 8.1% 5.4% Administration (33) % 30.3% 33.3% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 25% 7.8% 3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 35.3% 29.4% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 32.4% 35.1% 10.8% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 30.4% 41.1% 7.1%5.4%

22 / 42. Faculty, administration and staff are meaningfully involved in institutional planning. Your Overall (215) % 34% 34% 8.8% 7% Administration (32) % 31.3% 34.4% 6.3%6.3% Faculty (64) % 43.8% 23.4% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 31.3% 37.5% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 32.4% 37.8% 13.5% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (52) % 26.9% 38.5% 13.5% 9.6% 43. At this institution, we discuss and debate issues respectfully to get better results. Your Overall (214) % 31.8% 32.7% 11.2% 4.7% Administration (33) % 30.3% 33.3% 9.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 31.3% 23.4% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 60% 13.3% 0%6.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 35.1% 35.1% 18.9% 2.7% Non-exempt Staff (51) % 21.6% 47.1% 15.7% 5.9%

23 / 44. This institution's policies and practices ensure fair treatment for faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (224) % 42.4% 24.1% 11.2% 2.7% Administration (33) % 42.4% 21.2% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 43.8% 18.8% 7.8% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 33.3% 33.3% 0%5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 26.3% 13.2% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 43.9% 29.8% 12.3% 0% 45. At this institution, people are supportive of their colleagues regardless of their heritage or background. Your Overall (225) % 52% 11.6% 1.8%0.9% Administration (33) % 51.5% 6.1%0%0% Faculty (64) % 31.3% 10.9% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 42.1% 31.6% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 67.6% 8.1% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 63.8% 13.8% 1.7%0%

24 / 46. Faculty, administration and staff work together to ensure the success of institution programs and initiatives. Your Overall (221) % 42.5% 29% 4.1%1.8% Administration (33) % 45.5% 27.3% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 21.9% 0%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 29.4% 47.1% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 43.2% 29.7% 8.1% 2.7% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 41.1% 35.7% 7.1%1.8% 47. My supervisor/department chair supports my efforts to balance my work and personal life. Your Overall (224) % 37.9% 7.1%2.2%2.7% Administration (33) % 39.4% 3%3%3% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 4.7%1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 41.2% 11.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 44.7% 5.3%0%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 41.4% 12.1% 5.2%1.7%

25 / 48. Senior leadership regularly models this institution's values. Your Overall (223) % 40.8% 24.7% 4%2.7% Administration (33) % 39.4% 24.2% 0%6.1% Faculty (64) % 31.3% 18.8% 4.7%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 33.3% 33.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 47.4% 23.7% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 48.2% 30.4% 5.4%0% 49. This institution actively contributes to the community. Your Overall (225) % 44.9% 13.3% 2.7%0% Administration (33) % 39.4% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 37.5% 7.8% 3.1%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 10.5% 5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 59.5% 16.2% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 48.3% 17.2% 3.4%0%

26 / 50. This institution places sufficient emphasis on having diverse faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (220) % 51.4% 15.9% 4.1%0.5% Administration (33) % 54.5% 18.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 45.3% 10.9% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 23.5% 35.3% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) % 58.3% 25% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 55.4% 12.5% 3.6%0% 51. There is appropriate recognition of innovative and high quality teaching. Your Overall (163) % 52.8% 20.2% 4.3%3.7% Administration (28) % 64.3% 7.1%3.6%0% Faculty (63) % 39.7% 22.2% 6.3%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 37.5% 37.5% 12.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (19) % 63.2% 21.1% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (27) % 63% 22.2% 0%3.7%

27 / 52. We celebrate significant milestones and important accomplishments at this institution. Your Overall (220) % 52.7% 15.5% 4.1%1.4% Administration (33) % 42.4% 18.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 51.6% 9.4% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 41.2% 23.5% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 64.9% 13.5% 5.4%0% Non-exempt Staff (55) % 56.4% 18.2% 1.8%0% 53. This institution's policies and practices give me the flexibility to manage my work and personal life. Your Overall (224) % 46.4% 12.9% 1.3%0.9% Administration (33) % 54.5% 18.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 6.3%3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 58.8% 5.9%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 50% 10.5% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 43.1% 19% 1.7%0%

28 / 54. This institution has clear and effective procedures for dealing with discrimination. Your Overall (217) % 59.4% 11.1% 1.4%1.4% Administration (33) % 60.6% 15.2% 0%0% Faculty (59) % 50.8% 8.5% 1.7%3.4% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 64.7% 0%5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 68.4% 7.9% 0%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 58.9% 17.9% 1.8%0% 55. There is regular and open communication among faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (220) % 28.2% 36.4% 10.9% 3.6% Administration (33) % 27.3% 39.4% 9.1% 0% Faculty (64) % 31.3% 21.9% 9.4% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 29.4% 41.2% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) % 22.2% 36.1% 22.2% 5.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 26.8% 51.8% 7.1%5.4%

29 / 56. I believe what I am told by senior leadership. Your Overall (225) % 40.4% 21.3% 5.3%6.7% Administration (33) % 33.3% 30.3% 0% 9.1% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 18.8% 4.7%6.3% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 44.4% 11.1% 0%5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 50% 15.8% 13.2% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 43.1% 22.4% 5.2%6.9% 57. This institution is well run. Your Overall (226) % 41.2% 27.4% 6.6%1.8% Administration (33) % 42.4% 24.2% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) % 26.6% 25% 6.3%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 57.9% 15.8% 5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 39.5% 7.9% 0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 48.3% 25.9% 8.6% 1.7%

30 / 58. There's a sense that we're all on the same team at this institution. Your Overall (224) % 29% 31.3% 12.1% 7.1% Administration (33) % 24.2% 39.4% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 25% 21.9% 12.5% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 41.2% 29.4% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 28.9% 31.6% 15.8% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 31% 34.5% 12.1% 10.3% 59. This institution's culture is special - something you don't find just anywhere. Your Overall (225) % 45.3% 17.3% 5.8%1.8% Administration (33) % 45.5% 12.1% 0%3% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 17.2% 3.1%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 38.9% 22.2% 5.6%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 57.9% 15.8% 10.5% 2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 51.7% 19% 6.9%1.7%

31 / 60. All things considered, this is a great place to work. Your Overall (226) % 38.5% 13.7% 3.1%0.4% Administration (33) % 33.3% 15.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 21.9% 17.2% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 36.8% 26.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 52.6% 7.9% 2.6%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 48.3% 10.3% 1.7%0% 61. As a faculty member, I believe the College adequately supports scholarship. Your Overall (101) % 39.6% 18.8% 6.9%3% Administration (14) % 64.3% 14.3% 14.3% 0% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 21.9% 4.7%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 46.7% 13.3% 6.7%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (1) 5 100% 0%0%0%0% Non-exempt Staff (4) % 25% 25% 0%0%

32 / 62. As a faculty member, I believe faculty who stay at UVA-Wise are better off than those who leave. Your Overall (100) % 26% 35% 14% 5% Administration (14) % 42.9% 21.4% 14.3% 14.3% Faculty (62) % 24.2% 35.5% 17.7% 3.2% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 25% 43.8% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (1) 3 0%0% 100% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (4) 4 50% 25% 0% 25% 0% 63. As a faculty member, I believe the tenure and promotion process is comprehensible. Your Overall (85) % 41.2% 23.5% 7.1%4.7% Administration (11) % 63.6% 27.3% 0%0% Faculty (58) % 32.8% 24.1% 8.6% 5.2% Adjunct Faculty (10) % 60% 20% 10% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff - - Non-exempt Staff (4) % 50% 0%0% 25%

33 / 64. As a faculty member, I believe the tenure and promotion process is equitable. Your Overall (86) % 44.2% 26.7% 5.8%5.8% Administration (11) % 54.5% 27.3% 9.1% 0% Faculty (58) % 43.1% 22.4% 5.2% 8.6% Adjunct Faculty (11) % 36.4% 54.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff - - Non-exempt Staff (4) % 50% 0% 25% 0% 65. I believe a culture of open discussion and debate exists at the College. Your Overall (202) % 41.6% 31.2% 6.9%2% Administration (30) % 50% 16.7% 10% 0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 18.8% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 31.3% 37.5% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) % 44.1% 41.2% 8.8% 0% Non-exempt Staff (46) % 34.8% 50% 6.5%0%

34 / 66. I believe decisions affecting the College are arrived at in an open manner and understood by the college community. Your Overall (212) % 34% 34.9% 10.4% 6.6% Administration (30) % 43.3% 26.7% 13.3% 0% Faculty (64) % 32.8% 23.4% 9.4% 10.9% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 35.3% 41.2% 0%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 21.6% 54.1% 10.8% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (51) % 35.3% 39.2% 11.8% 5.9%

Great Colleges to Work For. Institutional Research and Information Tim Stanley, Associate Director Taylor Lovell, Research Analyst

Great Colleges to Work For. Institutional Research and Information Tim Stanley, Associate Director Taylor Lovell, Research Analyst Great Colleges to Work For Institutional Research and Information Tim Stanley, Associate Director Taylor Lovell, Research Analyst Purpose UVU participated in the Great Colleges to Work For survey in order

More information

2018 UNC System Employee Engagement. Survey Results

2018 UNC System Employee Engagement. Survey Results UNC System Employee Engagement Survey Results UNC System Strategic Plan Human Capital Goal The University will systematically focus on recruitment, retention, and development of the most talented and diverse

More information

The University of Tennessee Knoxville 2011 Great Colleges Survey

The University of Tennessee Knoxville 2011 Great Colleges Survey The University of Tennessee Knoxville 2011 Great Colleges Survey Richard K. Boyer March 21, 2011 Session Objectives Provide an introduction to ModernThink LLC and an overview of The Chronicle of Higher

More information

Overview of Reports Survey Results

Overview of Reports Survey Results Overview of Reports Survey Results Metropolitan State University of Denver Campus Climate Survey Spring 2015 Prepared by: 2 Mill Road, Suite 102 Wilmington, DE 19806 Phone: 888.684.4658 Fax: 888.684.4659

More information

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall 2017 Engagement Survey Definition of Terms 3WEEKS of survey administration September 6 th 27 th 99% Response rate 86% in 2015 121 responded to the survey 1 Comment Question Sustainable Engagement: 85%

More information

Benchmark Data Package Report Overview

Benchmark Data Package Report Overview Benchmark Data Package University of Texas Pan American Prepared by: ModernThink, LLC 4519 Weldin Road Wilmington, DE 19803 Phone: 888.684.4658 Fax: 302.764.4497 www.modernthink.com Page 1 Introduction

More information

2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey. New Mexico State University

2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey. New Mexico State University 2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey New Mexico State University Total number of employees at NMSU, all locations = 3,938 Total number of clicks of interest = 2,314 Number of useable responses = 1,668 Number

More information

THE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED

THE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED THE 10 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED Metric 1: PERSONAL GROWTH The Personal Growth Metric represents the level of autonomy employees have, whether or not they re improving their skills and if they

More information

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Laramie County Community College - Spring 2016 Respondents. Mean

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Laramie County Community College - Spring 2016 Respondents. Mean Section 1: Campus Culture and Policies IMPORTANCE SATISFACTION RATE IMPORTANCE (1 = "Not important at all" / 5 = "Very important") AND SATISFACTION (1 = "Not satisfied at all" / 5 = "Very satisfied") GAP

More information

Institutional Climate Update

Institutional Climate Update Institutional Climate Update Board of Trustees Thursday, June 1, 2017 Presented by Clyde W. Pickett, Ed.D. 1 Overview Coordination: Office of Institutional Diversity and Inclusion Office of Planning and

More information

2017 Engagement Survey. Results Overview

2017 Engagement Survey. Results Overview UK@Work Engagement Survey Results Overview Survey Overview 3WEEKS of survey administration September 6 th 27 th 62% Response rate 48% in 2015 5,269 responded to the survey (Staff: 4,093 Faculty: 1,176)

More information

ModernThink Employee Engagement Survey Summary Report

ModernThink Employee Engagement Survey Summary Report ModernThink Employee Engagement Survey 2018 Summary Report Prepared for the Office of the Provost Prepared by the Office of Institutional Research August 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary.. 2 About

More information

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. College of Ag, Food and Environment Overall

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. College of Ag, Food and Environment Overall 2017 Engagement Survey Definition of Terms 2 How to Read Results Scores Scores shown are the total Percent (typically the top two options). For example: Agree Tend to Agree? Responses Tend to Disagree

More information

COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS. A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: STRATEGIC PLANNING AND REPORTING

COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS. A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: STRATEGIC PLANNING AND REPORTING COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: 2010 2015 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND REPORTING December 2009 Challenge 1 Developing a Shared and Inclusive Understanding of Diversity

More information

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey Summary Report Fourth Annual Opinion Survey Conducted via telephone and online Spring 2003 Survey Background 57 Questions in the survey. Includes comment

More information

THE DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE-TUCSON, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MENTORING PROGRAM

THE DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE-TUCSON, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MENTORING PROGRAM COLLEGE OF MEDICINE-TUCSON, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MENTORING PROGRAM Goals The goals of the Department of Surgery mentoring program are: To create an environment that encourages and enables success of our

More information

Equitable Access and Success for Students Human Resources Awareness and Celebration of Diverse Cultures

Equitable Access and Success for Students Human Resources Awareness and Celebration of Diverse Cultures November 2011 Introduction The 2010 Cultural Climate Survey was administered in response to the need for a current study on campus climate and cultural competency to support SDCCD s commitment to diversity

More information

CHRONICLE GREAT COLLEGE TO WORK FOR 2016

CHRONICLE GREAT COLLEGE TO WORK FOR 2016 CHRONICLE GREAT COLLEGE TO WORK FOR University of Idaho AUGUST 25, DALE PIETRZAK, ED.D., DIRECTOR Institutional Research and Assessment Contents Introduction to Overall... 2 Overall Strengths: Performance

More information

General Information. 1. What department do you work for? 2. How long have you worked for the City? 3. Supervision: Do you supervise other employee(s)?

General Information. 1. What department do you work for? 2. How long have you worked for the City? 3. Supervision: Do you supervise other employee(s)? General Information 1. What department do you work for? Administrative Services City Attorney Community and Economic Development Community Services Court Executive Human Resources & Risk Management Police

More information

August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1

August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1 August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1 CAC/MSOS (MPI) 1-50 Reference: 2009 Annual Report page 27. Preamble: In response to Goal 6, one of MPI s strategies is To continue to respond to the issues raised

More information

Equitable Access and Success for Students Human Resources Awareness and Celebration of Diverse Cultures

Equitable Access and Success for Students Human Resources Awareness and Celebration of Diverse Cultures September 2011 Introduction The 2010 Cultural Climate Survey was administered in response to the need for a current study on campus climate and cultural competency to support SDCCD s commitment to diversity

More information

2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS 2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION 100% 95% 75% 65% 55% 86% 84% 65% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 Employee Survey Results Institutional Planning, Effectiveness, and

More information

Design Recruitment and support of a diverse student population.

Design Recruitment and support of a diverse student population. May 2011 Introduction Purpose To respond to the need for a current study on cultural competency in support of SDCCD s commitment to diversity as defined in Board Policy 7100. To meet WASC/ACCJC diversity

More information

2017 CALS Employee Survey Results Executive Summary. Heather Roberts-Wrenn March 2017

2017 CALS Employee Survey Results Executive Summary. Heather Roberts-Wrenn March 2017 2017 CALS Employee Survey Results Executive Summary Heather Roberts-Wrenn March 2017 Summary Of 1,375 CALS employees invited to participate on February 8 th, 2017 we received 454 usable survey responses

More information

Employee Satisfaction Survey. Office of Institutional Research & Assessment

Employee Satisfaction Survey. Office of Institutional Research & Assessment Employee Satisfaction Survey Office of Institutional Research & Assessment December, 2011 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary... 1 Appendices: Appendix A: Summary Data Figure 1: Average Importance

More information

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS March 2012 Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration Robert Pignatello 4th Annual JJC Employee Engagement Survey Summary Designed to obtain

More information

ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT

ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT WSU VANCOUVER For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 49 respondents in compared to 30 respondents in who identified their department within WSU Vancouver. Within WSU Vancouver, the response

More information

SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings

SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey Results and Findings Prepared by Dr. Hannah Lawler, Dean of Institutional Research March 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Santa Monica College (SMC)

More information

Pellissippi State Community College. Performance Evaluation Process (Administrative and Support Staff)

Pellissippi State Community College. Performance Evaluation Process (Administrative and Support Staff) Pellissippi State Community College Performance Evaluation Process (Administrative and Support Staff) January 2016 The Performance Evaluation Process serves as a formal mechanism for ensuring that all

More information

2010 Employee Survey Results. May 2010

2010 Employee Survey Results. May 2010 2010 Employee Survey Results May 2010 Response Rate Response rate was similar to previous CCC Employee Surveys Status Number Responding Response Rate Full Time 101 70% Part Time 46 19% Total 147 38% Responses

More information

Self Assessment Guide for a Great Safety Culture

Self Assessment Guide for a Great Safety Culture Self Assessment Guide for a Great Safety Culture Overview: Safety culture is in an intrinsic part of organization culture. Safety culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, and attitudes that influence

More information

Inclusive Excellence at the University of Missouri System Framework Draft

Inclusive Excellence at the University of Missouri System Framework Draft Inclusive Excellence at the University of Missouri System 2016-2018 Framework Draft The Inclusive Excellence Framework reaffirms the University of Missouri System s commitment to growing and sustaining

More information

Report Employee Satisfaction Survey

Report Employee Satisfaction Survey Report Employee Satisfaction Survey Communication 1 In my company, there is open, honest communication. 2 My ideas and suggestions are heard and valued by upper management. 3 I receive adequate information

More information

Guide for Faculty Mentors

Guide for Faculty Mentors Guide for Faculty Mentors To receive an electronic copy of this document, send a request to lou.duarte@nyumc.org Updated: April 18, 2017 2017 NYU Langone Medical Center Contents Introduction: Goals & Responsibilities...3

More information

VOILAND COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE 2018

VOILAND COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE 2018 For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 103 respondents in compared to 52 respondents in 2016 who identified their department within the Voiland of Engineering and Architecture (VCEA). For,

More information

Goal 1: Prepare Students for Leading Roles in an Innovation-driven Economy and Global Society

Goal 1: Prepare Students for Leading Roles in an Innovation-driven Economy and Global Society Goal 1: Prepare Students for Leading Roles in an Innovation-driven Economy and Global Society Objective 1.1 Enroll more high-ability students from all societal segments. Strategy 1.1.1 Enhance marketing

More information

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY Customer Service Centre March 31, 2015 on behalf of TTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overall Engagement Score 14 Aspects of Employee Engagement 18 What Drives Engagement

More information

Dartmouth College Employee Survey Results. April 27, 2006

Dartmouth College Employee Survey Results. April 27, 2006 Dartmouth College Employee Survey Results April 27, 2006 Goals and Objectives The Dartmouth College Employee Survey will help the administration: To better understand employees experience To identify employees

More information

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government What We ll Cover 1. What is employee engagement and why does it matter? 2. Measuring engagement 3. Improving engagement 4. Creating an engagement

More information

FACULTY MENTORING RESOURCE BOOK-2012

FACULTY MENTORING RESOURCE BOOK-2012 FACULTY MENTORING RESOURCE BOOK-2012 OFFICE OF THE PROVOST UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE 1 Table of Contents 1. Purpose 3 2. Introduction.3 3. Importance of Mentoring 3 4. Faculty Development Needs Assessment

More information

NTID Faculty Workload Guidelines

NTID Faculty Workload Guidelines Draft #8-FINAL April 4, 1997 NTID Faculty Workload Guidelines Background Recent efforts of NTID faculty and administration to review faculty workload guidelines are the direct result of internal and external

More information

Fall 2017 Campus Climate and Diversity Survey

Fall 2017 Campus Climate and Diversity Survey Fall 2017 Campus Climate and Diversity Survey Background and Implementation The Campus Climate and Diversity Survey for Faculty and Staff is a campus-wide assessment of diversity, inclusion, and workplace

More information

Draft Faculty Mentoring

Draft Faculty Mentoring Draft Faculty Mentoring This draft document begins the conversation of how to tailor a mentoring program for our college by offering two methods along a spectrum of possible vehicles for implementation

More information

Faculty Mentorship. April 26, 2016.

Faculty Mentorship. April 26, 2016. Faculty Mentorship April 26, 2016. COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE, DESIGN, AND THE ARTS Faculty Mentorship Presentation FORMS OF FACULTY MENTORSHIP 1. Faculty Mentoring Plan 2. P+T Seminar 3. Grants Seminar 4.

More information

Strategic Diversity Plan

Strategic Diversity Plan Strategic Diversity Plan 2017-2022 Policy Statements Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Statement Regarding Gender Discrimination Policy Statement Regarding Discrimination Shared Values Integrity We act

More information

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP)

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP) INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP) An Individual Development Plan (IDP) is an essential planning document that identifies your goals and objectives. It is expected that all graduate students will utilize

More information

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY COO's Office/DCOO's Office/Operations Control March 30, 2015 on behalf of TTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overall Engagement Score 10 Aspects of Employee Engagement 14 Overall

More information

Accountability and Development Review

Accountability and Development Review Accountability and Development Review Policy Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Scope 1 3 Benefits 1 4 Statement of Policy and Key Principles 2 5 Process 2 5.1 Self-Review 3 5.2 Review Meeting 3 5.3 Following

More information

GENDER PAY GAP REPORT

GENDER PAY GAP REPORT GENDER PAY GAP REPORT 2017 UEA Gender Pay Gap Report 2017 2 UEA WELCOMES THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUBLISH THIS FIRST REPORT ON THE GENDER PAY GAP. At UEA we are proud to provide the facilities and the working

More information

What We ve Done to Date: A status report to employees on progress made on the 2004 employee survey

What We ve Done to Date: A status report to employees on progress made on the 2004 employee survey What We ve Done to Date: A status report to employees on progress made on the 2004 employee survey One year ago, the results of the first employee survey were released and government made some commitments

More information

Employer handbook for. Internships. We are in the business of building successful futures. TM

Employer handbook for. Internships. We are in the business of building successful futures. TM Employer handbook for Internships Our mission is to support careers by bridging the gap between business students and the business community through internship and placement opportunities. internship Who

More information

Current Practices in Faculty Mentoring at RIT: A Summary of 2013 Questionnaire Results November 15, 2013

Current Practices in Faculty Mentoring at RIT: A Summary of 2013 Questionnaire Results November 15, 2013 : A Summary of 2013 Questionnaire Results vember 15, 2013 Anne Marie Canale Cheryl Herdklotz Lynn Wild Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Questionnaire Results... 4 General Information on College

More information

Internship. design an. Creating a valuable experience for employers and students. Establishing an Internship or Co-op Program 2 3

Internship. design an. Creating a valuable experience for employers and students. Establishing an Internship or Co-op Program 2 3 Creating a valuable experience for employers and students. Internship design an C O N T E N T S Establishing an Internship or Co-op Program 2 3 Guidelines Benchmarks of Quality Supervising Your Student

More information

Staff Survey september - october 2016 results. Voice Project

Staff Survey september - october 2016 results. Voice Project Staff Survey september - october 2016 results Voice Project report overview This report on the 2016 Edith Cowan University Staff Survey: Assesses multiple indicators of Edith Cowan University's performance

More information

Generational Differences Quiz

Generational Differences Quiz Generational Differences Quiz Self Quiz Circle the description that best describes your perception of work in each row. Then, add up your score for all columns. Attitude toward work assignments Role of

More information

Developing a Culture of Collaboration Through Employee Engagement

Developing a Culture of Collaboration Through Employee Engagement Developing a Culture of Collaboration Through Employee Engagement HR@UW CONFERENCE Developing a Culture of Collaboration Bob Lavigna Director, Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement What We ll

More information

Department of Facilities Management Equity Action Plan

Department of Facilities Management Equity Action Plan Department of Facilities Management Equity Action Plan Organization: Division of Maintenance As Of: March 2014 Foreword The Department of Facilities Management (DFM) is committed to the tenets of the Montgomery

More information

Organizational Integration of Part-Time Faculty Teaching Developmental Mathematics. Sylvia Gray, Researcher September 15, 2017

Organizational Integration of Part-Time Faculty Teaching Developmental Mathematics. Sylvia Gray, Researcher September 15, 2017 Organizational Integration of Part-Time Faculty Teaching Developmental Mathematics Sylvia Gray, Researcher September 15, 2017 Introduction In 1969 about 78% full-time tenured or tenure-track 22% were non-tenure-track

More information

Employee Opinion Survey

Employee Opinion Survey Employee Opinion Survey Canutillo Independent School District April 6, 2017 Catherine Rubiera Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Background... 2 Survey Administration and Respondents... 2 Major Findings...

More information

Vision Human Resources

Vision Human Resources Vision 2020 Human Resources Welcome from the Director Mission: We will provide high-quality, added value service that will attract and support our people. Imperial College HR will be an exemplar of excellence

More information

Dartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey

Dartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey Dartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey Data Analysis Solutions Prepared for: Dartmouth College Survey Overview Revised survey allowed for new questions and comparison to results from the 2006 Dartmouth College

More information

Plant the SEEDS for your College s Future Using a Competency-Based Performance Management System. Presented by Alexa Bazley & Kaye Waugh

Plant the SEEDS for your College s Future Using a Competency-Based Performance Management System. Presented by Alexa Bazley & Kaye Waugh 1 Plant the SEEDS for your College s Future Using a Competency-Based Performance Management System Presented by Alexa Bazley & Kaye Waugh A-B Tech background Location: Asheville, North Carolina Employees:

More information

P a g e 1. Growing through people. 1. What is Performance for Growth (P4G)?

P a g e 1. Growing through people. 1. What is Performance for Growth (P4G)? P a g e 1 1. What is Performance for Growth (P4G)? P4G is a framework that provides the opportunity for all UCD employees to have at least one annual conversation with their line manager, Head of School

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM NO. 3072 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM 1.0 POLICY STATEMENT: Oklahoma City Community College (OCCC) provides and maintains working conditions that comply with federal, state and local standards

More information

ITS. All-Staff Strategic Planning Launch. July 9 & 16, 2018

ITS. All-Staff Strategic Planning Launch. July 9 & 16, 2018 ITS All-Staff Strategic Planning Launch July 9 & 16, 2018 + Expectations for the day + Agenda Introduction Living Our Core Values Progress Update - Strategic Planning Envisioning the Future Wrap up + Introductions

More information

DO YOU WANT A MENTOR?

DO YOU WANT A MENTOR? DO YOU WANT A MENTOR? TABLE OF CONTENTS I THINK I WANT A MENTOR--AM I READY?...2 HOW TO FIND A MENTOR THAT IS RIGHT FOR YOU...3 TIPS FOR A SUCCESSFUL RELATIONSHIP...4 THE GOALS ARE ACHIEVED--WHAT NEXT?...6

More information

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY Subway Extensions (Spadina/Scar.) March 24, 2015 on behalf of TTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overall Engagement Score 10 Aspects of Employee Engagement 14 Overall Organizational

More information

Staff Survey Feedback 2012

Staff Survey Feedback 2012 Staff Survey Feedback 2012 In July 2012 Brisbane Catholic Education conducted a staff survey involving all schools within the Archdiocese. The purpose of the survey is to promote and inform discussions

More information

NEW COLLEGE LEICESTER. Policy for the Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) at New College Leicester

NEW COLLEGE LEICESTER. Policy for the Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) at New College Leicester NEW COLLEGE LEICESTER Policy for the Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) at New College Leicester 2017-2018 Policy for the Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) at New College Leicester

More information

Human Capital. Date of Report. Theme Group Name. Members. Introduction. Innovation. February 2, Human Capital

Human Capital. Date of Report. Theme Group Name. Members. Introduction. Innovation. February 2, Human Capital Date of Report February 2, 2018 Theme Group Name Human Capital Members Co-Chair 1: On-Campus Faculty: Roy Issa Co-Chair 2: Off-Campus: Puff Niegos Facilitator: David Kohler Resource: Nancy Hampton Off-Campus

More information

Institutional Strengths. Improvement Opportunities & Implementation Suggestions. Institutional Summary

Institutional Strengths. Improvement Opportunities & Implementation Suggestions. Institutional Summary Institutional Summary As part of RMUoHP s comprehensive institutional assessment and continuous improvement process, the purpose of the annual Employee Engagement Survey is to collect institutional data

More information

Metropolitan Community College Omaha, Nebraska

Metropolitan Community College Omaha, Nebraska Metropolitan Community College Omaha, Nebraska Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Custom Report by Katie Ratterree & Alessandra Dinin The National Initiative for Leadership & Institutional

More information

CSC MERIT POLICY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER Revised, 6/12/14

CSC MERIT POLICY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER Revised, 6/12/14 CSC MERIT POLICY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER Revised, 6/12/14 PURPOSE This policy outlines Community Service Center (CSC) procedures for determining and assigning merit raises, when available. 1. Full Inclusion

More information

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government Introduction Bob Lavigna Director Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement CPS HR Consulting 2 What We ll Cover 1. What is employee engagement

More information

William & Mary 2015 Employee Climate Survey

William & Mary 2015 Employee Climate Survey Summary Report umber of Respondents: 155 Page 0 Page 1 eutral W&M As A Place To Work 1. Considering your experience here as well as what you know of other organizations, how would you rate William & Mary

More information

NAVIGATING THROUGH ACADEMIC CAREER PATHS: A MENTORING CONTINUUM

NAVIGATING THROUGH ACADEMIC CAREER PATHS: A MENTORING CONTINUUM NAVIGATING THROUGH ACADEMIC CAREER PATHS: A MENTORING CONTINUUM ORIENTATION EARLY SOCIALIZATION ESTABLISHING CREDENTIALS MID-CAREER/ MID-DEGREE TRANSITIONS to the unit establishing ongoing relationship

More information

The Red Book Code of Business Conduct

The Red Book Code of Business Conduct The Red Book Code of Business Conduct Our medicines can improve people s health profoundly. Whether they know us by name or not, our customers count on each of us at Lilly, in our own ways, to help them

More information

Campus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness

Campus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness Campus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness Background Within the last decade, SDSU has sought to create a healthy and welcoming campus community. Students, employees, and constituents contribute

More information

Sample Company. Bringing Best Practices, Engagement Programs, and Outstanding Results to HR Departments. New Hire Surveys: *Dates.

Sample Company. Bringing Best Practices, Engagement Programs, and Outstanding Results to HR Departments. New Hire Surveys: *Dates. Bringing Best Practices, Engagement Programs, and Outstanding Results to HR Departments Sample Company New Hire Surveys: *Dates 53 Employees 44 Responses Response Rate McLean & Company 1 Interpreting the

More information

Analyzing Employee Survey Data. Task Force on Race and Race Relations February 2016

Analyzing Employee Survey Data. Task Force on Race and Race Relations February 2016 Analyzing Employee Survey Data Task Force on Race and Race Relations February 2016 Employee Survey Emailed to 2,765 employees. Faculty were included for the first time. 71% response rate (n=1,955) Higher

More information

2015 Staff Senate Survey Results

2015 Staff Senate Survey Results 2015 Staff Senate Survey Results Overall Results The 2015 results, for the most part, continue the increasing satisfaction levels shown in the 2014 survey results. Staff are proud to work for WCU, are

More information

2016 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results

2016 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results 216 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results 1 216 Survey of Employee Engagement - Work Group Results The Survey of Employee Engagement (SEE) is conducted every two years at Texas A&M University

More information

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS JULY 2016 Survey Administered by the Institutional Effectiveness Committee March-June 2016 Report Prepared by the Office of Institutional Advancement Data Support

More information

Very. dissatisfied. Somewhat. dissatisfied 11% Somewhat. satisfied 42%

Very. dissatisfied. Somewhat. dissatisfied 11% Somewhat. satisfied 42% About the 2016 Employee Survey The first Cornell Employee Survey in 2011 was a response to a resolution from the Employee Assembly calling for a study to better understand staff engagement. This second

More information

2017 Merritt College Employee Satisfaction Survey

2017 Merritt College Employee Satisfaction Survey 2017 Merritt Employee Satisfaction Survey Merritt Executive Summary In spring 2017, Merritt administered the Noel Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey to all faculty, staff and administrators. This survey

More information

This report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2.

This report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2. This report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2 www.altgov2.org/fevs 2014 CFPB annual employee survey December 2014 Introduction Interpretation of results More than 83 percent of the CFPB employee

More information

Gender pay gap report 2017

Gender pay gap report 2017 Gender pay gap report 2017 Introduction Nick Hugh CEO Women should expect to have the same opportunities to advance their careers as men. It is not only right for society but for the success of our business.

More information

2018 Employee Climate Survey

2018 Employee Climate Survey 2018 Employee Climate Survey 2018 Employee Climate Survey Summary Employees were invited to take the 2018 campus climate survey between Oct. 15 and Nov. 9, 2018. The survey consisted of 79 questions. Thirty-four

More information

M. Patrice Eiff, MD Professor Director of Faculty Development- Family Medicine Director, SOM TALENT Program

M. Patrice Eiff, MD Professor Director of Faculty Development- Family Medicine Director, SOM TALENT Program M. Patrice Eiff, MD Professor Director of Faculty Development- Family Medicine Director, SOM TALENT Program Workshop Objectives Discuss tips for strategic career management. Reflect on your career strengths

More information

HLC Criteria and Core Component Crosswalk with AQIP Portfolio Processes

HLC Criteria and Core Component Crosswalk with AQIP Portfolio Processes HLC Criteria and Core Component Crosswalk with AQIP Portfolio Processes General Guidelines for Using this Crosswalk The crosswalk below gives the connections between HLC Criteria/Core Components and AQIP

More information

SampleCo Organization Survey Results

SampleCo Organization Survey Results SampleCo Organization Survey Results October 2009 Profile Report (This report was created on 5/30/2017) Table of Contents 1 Introduction: High Performance Organizations 2 Understanding the Data 3 Overall

More information

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER 2018 2018 BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results Introduction Interpretation of results More than 72 percent of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

More information

UVM Extension Workforce Diversity Recruiting and Retention Plan: 2012

UVM Extension Workforce Diversity Recruiting and Retention Plan: 2012 UVM Extension Workforce Diversity Recruiting and Retention Plan: 2012 Summary All Search Committee Chairs and members are provided a copy of this document and the University Diversity Workforce Recruitment

More information

Assignment of Responsibility

Assignment of Responsibility Assignment of Responsibility The tables below show who is responsible for implementing the strategies and action items for each goal of the Plan. 1) Recruit, support and retain a diverse student body Key

More information

Gender Differences in Pathways to Career Satisfaction

Gender Differences in Pathways to Career Satisfaction Gender Differences in Pathways to Career Satisfaction Heather Doty Assist. Prof., Mechanical Engineering Robin Andreasen Assoc. Prof., Linguistics & Cognitive Science Dandan Chen Ph.D. Candidate, School

More information

OVERVIEW. Relationship Between Versatility and Diversity Among Leaders

OVERVIEW. Relationship Between Versatility and Diversity Among Leaders A T R A C O M G R O U P W H I T E P A P E R Relationship Between Versatility and Diversity Among Leaders OVERVIEW In a study of 143 managers at a large multinational defense contractor, we found that managers

More information

Inclusive Excellence at MU Framework Draft

Inclusive Excellence at MU Framework Draft Inclusive Excellence at MU 2016-2020 Framework Draft The Inclusive Excellence Framework reaffirms the University of Missouri s commitment to growing and sustaining a diverse and inclusive learning, living,

More information

I. Introduction. Diversity Strategic Plan v4 1

I. Introduction. Diversity Strategic Plan v4 1 Administrative Department/Unit/Division: Texas State University Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan Administrative Support Plan 2017-2023 [Final June 2017] I. Introduction State your administrative

More information