ModernThink 2016 Great Colleges Survey The University of Virginia's College at Wise Response Distribution Report
|
|
- Brianne Rice
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 / Average All Statements (1-66) Your Overall (233) % 38.7% 20.8% 6.5%4.3% Administration (33) % 38.9% 18.8% 5.8%2.3% Faculty (64) % 33.2% 16.4% 5.7%3.8% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 40.7% 20.7% 4.6%3.2% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 40.6% 24.8% 7.5% 5.8% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 42.2% 24.2% 7.5% 5.3% 1. My job makes good use of my skills and abilities. Your Overall (233) % 42.9% 10.7% 2.6%1.3% Administration (33) % 45.5% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 1.6%1.6%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 52.6% 0%5.3%5.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 21.1% 2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 51.7% 13.8% 5.2%0%
2 / 2. I am given the responsibility and freedom to do my job. Your Overall (233) % 32.2% 6.4%0.9%0.9% Administration (33) % 15.2% 6.1%0%0% Faculty (64) % 18.8% 3.1%0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 47.4% 5.3%2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 37.9% 10.3% 1.7%0% 3. My supervisor/department chair makes his/her expectations clear. Your Overall (233) % 32.6% 14.6% 4.7%3.9% Administration (33) % 27.3% 6.1% 9.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 25% 6.3%1.6%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 52.6% 10.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 36.8% 26.3% 0% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 37.9% 19% 10.3% 3.4%
3 / 4. I am provided the resources I need to be effective in my job. Your Overall (233) % 42.1% 23.2% 5.2%3.9% Administration (33) % 33.3% 27.3% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) % 39.1% 20.3% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3% 10.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 52.6% 23.7% 2.6% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 46.6% 27.6% 3.4%3.4% 5. I understand how my job contributes to this institution's mission. Your Overall (233) % 36.5% 7.3% 1.7%0% Administration (33) % 27.3% 3%3%0% Faculty (64) % 15.6% 10.9% 0%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 7.9% 5.3%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 53.4% 3.4%1.7%0%
4 / 6. I am given the opportunity to develop my skills at this institution. Your Overall (231) % 40.7% 12.6% 3.9%1.3% Administration (33) % 39.4% 6.1%6.1%0% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 7.8% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 36.8% 21.1% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 56.1% 14% 1.8%0% 7. I receive feedback from my supervisor/department chair that helps me. Your Overall (233) % 37.3% 16.7% 6% 5.2% Administration (33) % 45.5% 12.1% 3%3% Faculty (64) % 29.7% 12.5% 4.7%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 36.8% 15.8% 10.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 39.7% 24.1% 8.6% 5.2%
5 / 8. When I offer a new idea, I believe it will be fully considered. Your Overall (229) % 38% 17.9% 5.7%4.8% Administration (33) % 42.4% 15.2% 3%3% Faculty (64) % 32.8% 10.9% 1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 35.3% 17.6% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 46.4% 25% 14.3% 1.8% 9. I am regularly recognized for my contributions. Your Overall (231) % 27.3% 30.7% 11.7% 6.1% Administration (32) % 31.3% 25% 6.3%3.1% Faculty (64) % 29.7% 23.4% 9.4% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 33.3% 5.6% 27.8% 5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 23.7% 39.5% 7.9% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 27.6% 32.8% 13.8% 5.2%
6 / 10. I understand the necessary requirements to advance my career. Your Overall (222) % 42.3% 18.5% 6.3%5.4% Administration (32) % 40.6% 25% 0%3.1% Faculty (63) % 34.9% 15.9% 1.6%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 47.1% 11.8% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) % 41.7% 19.4% 13.9% 5.6% Non-exempt Staff (55) % 49.1% 20% 7.3% 7.3% 11. I am paid fairly for my work. Your Overall (231) % 34.6% 20.3% 16% 13% Administration (33) % 33.3% 15.2% 12.1% 6.1% Faculty (64) % 43.8% 20.3% 9.4% 7.8% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 21.1% 10.5% 5.3% 31.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 28.9% 15.8% 31.6% 18.4% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 34.5% 24.1% 17.2% 17.2%
7 / 12. I believe what I am told by my supervisor/department chair. Your Overall (230) % 30% 13.9% 4.8%3.9% Administration (33) % 30.3% 15.2% 3%0% Faculty (63) % 17.5% 6.3%4.8%3.2% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 42.1% 5.3%5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 23.7% 26.3% 2.6%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 43.1% 15.5% 5.2% 8.6% 13. We have opportunities to contribute to important decisions in my department. Your Overall (227) % 33.9% 20.7% 6.2%4.4% Administration (33) % 39.4% 15.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 29.7% 10.9% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 16.7% 16.7% 11.1% 11.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 28.9% 28.9% 5.3% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (55) % 43.6% 27.3% 7.3% 7.3%
8 / 14. I can speak up or challenge a traditional way of doing something without fear of harming my career. Your Overall (226) % 31.4% 21.2% 6.2%5.3% Administration (33) % 33.3% 18.2% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) % 20.3% 18.8% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 37.5% 18.8% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 23.7% 2.6% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 28.6% 26.8% 10.7% 10.7% 15. My supervisor/department chair regularly models this institution's values. Your Overall (229) % 35.8% 11.8% 4.8%5.7% Administration (33) % 30.3% 9.1% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) % 26.6% 6.3%4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 31.6% 31.6% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 15.8% 5.3% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 50.9% 8.8% 5.3% 12.3%
9 / 16. Promotions in my department are based on a person's ability. Your Overall (206) % 30.6% 25.2% 10.2% 11.2% Administration (31) % 32.3% 12.9% 12.9% 3.2% Faculty (62) % 35.5% 17.7% 6.5%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (14) % 42.9% 42.9% 0%7.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (32) % 31.3% 31.3% 9.4% 18.8% Non-exempt Staff (50) % 22% 30% 14% 22% 17. Our review process accurately measures my job performance. Your Overall (221) % 37.6% 22.6% 11.3% 9% Administration (33) % 45.5% 15.2% 12.1% 3% Faculty (62) % 40.3% 14.5% 8.1% 8.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 29.4% 35.3% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 35.1% 40.5% 0% 10.8% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 39.3% 14.3% 23.2% 14.3%
10 / 18. Issues of low performance are addressed in my department. Your Overall (210) % 29.5% 23.8% 14.8% 14.3% Administration (31) % 45.2% 19.4% 6.5%6.5% Faculty (59) % 32.2% 20.3% 11.9% 13.6% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 13.3% 40% 6.7% 13.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) % 29.4% 17.6% 26.5% 11.8% Non-exempt Staff (53) % 26.4% 32.1% 17% 18.9% 19. My supervisor/department chair is consistent and fair. Your Overall (230) % 33.9% 15.7% 3.5%5.7% Administration (33) % 42.4% 9.1% 3%3% Faculty (64) % 25% 9.4% 1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 42.1% 15.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 39.5% 23.7% 2.6%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 37.9% 19% 5.2% 12.1%
11 / 20. My supervisor/department chair actively solicits my suggestions and ideas. Your Overall (229) % 31.4% 19.2% 3.1%4.8% Administration (33) % 36.4% 21.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 23.4% 10.9% 1.6%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 26.3% 26.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 26.3% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 35.7% 21.4% 7.1% 10.7% 21. In my department, we communicate openly about issues that impact each other's work. Your Overall (229) % 38% 24.5% 5.7%5.7% Administration (33) % 36.4% 24.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 12.5% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 38.9% 22.2% 5.6%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 28.9% 7.9% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 37.9% 31% 8.6% 12.1%
12 / 22. Changes that affect me are discussed prior to being implemented. Your Overall (226) % 36.7% 26.5% 7.5% 8.8% Administration (33) % 33.3% 33.3% 6.1%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 15.6% 3.1%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 52.9% 5.9%0% 11.8% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 28.9% 36.8% 7.9% 15.8% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 32.1% 33.9% 14.3% 12.5% 23. People in my department work well together. Your Overall (228) % 36.8% 19.3% 4.8%4.4% Administration (33) % 30.3% 21.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 12.5% 3.1%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 47.1% 23.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 39.5% 26.3% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 39.7% 22.4% 8.6% 6.9%
13 / 24. I have a good relationship with my supervisor/department chair. Your Overall (230) % 34.3% 11.7% 2.6%2.2% Administration (33) % 33.3% 6.1%0%3% Faculty (64) % 23.4% 6.3%0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 15.8% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 41.4% 19% 8.6% 0% 25. Overall, my department is a good place to work. Your Overall (230) % 34.3% 14.3% 2.2%0.9% Administration (33) % 33.3% 9.1% 0%3% Faculty (64) % 18.8% 15.6% 0%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 5.3%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 36.8% 13.2% 5.3%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 48.3% 17.2% 3.4%0%
14 / 26. I can count on people to cooperate across departments. Your Overall (222) % 40.1% 32.9% 8.6% 5% Administration (33) % 27.3% 48.5% 0%3% Faculty (63) % 39.7% 25.4% 7.9% 4.8% Adjunct Faculty (13) % 61.5% 15.4% 7.7% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 36.8% 15.8% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 40.4% 35.1% 10.5% 5.3% 27. Senior leadership provides a clear direction for this institution's future. Your Overall (226) % 36.7% 27.4% 6.2%4.4% Administration (33) % 39.4% 18.2% 12.1% 6.1% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 21.9% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 25% 43.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 34.2% 31.6% 7.9% 10.5% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 38.6% 36.8% 3.5%3.5%
15 / 28. My department has adequate faculty/staff to achieve our goals. Your Overall (229) % 28.8% 26.6% 21.8% 14.4% Administration (33) % 24.2% 27.3% 30.3% 6.1% Faculty (64) % 21.9% 20.3% 25% 23.4% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 22.2% 22.2% 27.8% 11.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 26.3% 36.8% 21.1% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 36.2% 25.9% 17.2% 12.1% 29. The institution takes reasonable steps to provide a safe and secure environment for the campus. Your Overall (229) % 49.8% 8.3% 0.9%1.7% Administration (33) % 54.5% 9.1% 0%0% Faculty (63) % 46% 6.3%3.2%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 36.8% 5.3%0%5.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 52.6% 7.9% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 53.4% 12.1% 0%3.4%
16 / 30. Our orientation program prepares new faculty, administration and staff to be effective. Your Overall (213) % 35.7% 30.5% 11.3% 9.9% Administration (33) % 21.2% 24.2% 36.4% 9.1% Faculty (60) % 40% 31.7% 3.3% 8.3% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 46.7% 6.7%6.7%6.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) % 36.1% 38.9% 11.1% 8.3% Non-exempt Staff (54) % 35.2% 29.6% 9.3% 13% 31. The facilities (e.g., classrooms, offices, laboratories) adequately meet my needs. Your Overall (200) % 45.5% 28.5% 7.5% 3% Administration (32) % 43.8% 28.1% 3.1%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 31.3% 7.8% 3.1% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 43.8% 37.5% 0% 12.5% Exempt Prof'l Staff (31) % 51.6% 22.6% 12.9% 3.2% Non-exempt Staff (44) % 52.3% 29.5% 9.1% 0%
17 / 32. Our senior leadership has the knowledge, skills and experience necessary for institutional success. Your Overall (224) % 45.1% 18.3% 5.8%1.8% Administration (33) % 39.4% 9.1% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 37.5% 12.5% 7.8% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 61.1% 5.6%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 44.7% 28.9% 5.3%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (55) % 43.6% 30.9% 1.8%1.8% 33. There is a good balance of teaching, service and research at this institution. Your Overall (198) % 54.5% 18.2% 6.6%2% Administration (32) % 59.4% 18.8% 6.3%0% Faculty (64) % 43.8% 14.1% 9.4% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 52.9% 23.5% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (31) % 58.1% 25.8% 6.5%0% Non-exempt Staff (39) % 66.7% 12.8% 2.6%0%
18 / 34. This institution's benefits meet my needs. Your Overall (217) % 41% 24.9% 7.8% 6.5% Administration (33) % 45.5% 21.2% 3%3% Faculty (64) % 32.8% 26.6% 10.9% 6.3% Adjunct Faculty (11) % 54.5% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 28.9% 10.5% 2.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 44.6% 21.4% 7.1% 10.7% 35. Our recognition and awards programs are meaningful to me. Your Overall (207) % 30.9% 29% 15.5% 8.2% Administration (31) % 41.9% 19.4% 16.1% 3.2% Faculty (62) % 27.4% 24.2% 11.3% 9.7% Adjunct Faculty (13) % 30.8% 23.1% 23.1% 7.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) % 26.5% 38.2% 17.6% 11.8% Non-exempt Staff (52) % 34.6% 32.7% 13.5% 7.7%
19 / 36. I am proud to be part of this institution. Your Overall (227) % 32.6% 13.2% 1.3%0% Administration (33) % 21.2% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 15.6% 3.1%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 42.1% 10.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 39.5% 15.8% 2.6%0% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 33.3% 10.5% 0%0% 37. Senior leadership shows a genuine interest in the well-being of faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (225) % 39.1% 20.9% 6.2%6.2% Administration (33) % 39.4% 21.2% 3%6.1% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 14.1% 7.8% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 29.4% 35.3% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 50% 21.1% 5.3% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 42.1% 26.3% 5.3% 7%
20 / 38. The role of faculty in shared governance is clearly stated and publicized. Your Overall (175) % 42.9% 25.1% 6.9%0.6% Administration (30) % 43.3% 23.3% 3.3%3.3% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 18.8% 4.7%0% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 52.9% 17.6% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (24) % 37.5% 45.8% 8.3% 0% Non-exempt Staff (28) % 39.3% 35.7% 10.7% 0% 39. Faculty are appropriately involved in decisions related to the education program (e.g., curriculum development, evaluation). Your Overall (150) % 46% 16.7% 3.3%0.7% Administration (26) % 46.2% 7.7% 7.7% 0% Faculty (64) % 42.2% 9.4% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 41.2% 23.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (14) % 35.7% 50% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (20) % 60% 25% 0%0%
21 / 40. Teaching is appropriately recognized in the evaluation and promotion process. Your Overall (140) % 44.3% 19.3% 6.4%0% Administration (23) % 39.1% 13% 4.3%0% Faculty (62) % 33.9% 19.4% 11.3% 0% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 66.7% 20% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (12) % 33.3% 41.7% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (18) % 66.7% 11.1% 5.6%0% 41. Senior leadership communicates openly about important matters. Your Overall (221) % 32.6% 33% 8.1% 5.4% Administration (33) % 30.3% 33.3% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 25% 7.8% 3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 35.3% 29.4% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 32.4% 35.1% 10.8% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 30.4% 41.1% 7.1%5.4%
22 / 42. Faculty, administration and staff are meaningfully involved in institutional planning. Your Overall (215) % 34% 34% 8.8% 7% Administration (32) % 31.3% 34.4% 6.3%6.3% Faculty (64) % 43.8% 23.4% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 31.3% 37.5% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 32.4% 37.8% 13.5% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (52) % 26.9% 38.5% 13.5% 9.6% 43. At this institution, we discuss and debate issues respectfully to get better results. Your Overall (214) % 31.8% 32.7% 11.2% 4.7% Administration (33) % 30.3% 33.3% 9.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 31.3% 23.4% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 60% 13.3% 0%6.7% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 35.1% 35.1% 18.9% 2.7% Non-exempt Staff (51) % 21.6% 47.1% 15.7% 5.9%
23 / 44. This institution's policies and practices ensure fair treatment for faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (224) % 42.4% 24.1% 11.2% 2.7% Administration (33) % 42.4% 21.2% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 43.8% 18.8% 7.8% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 33.3% 33.3% 0%5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 26.3% 13.2% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (57) % 43.9% 29.8% 12.3% 0% 45. At this institution, people are supportive of their colleagues regardless of their heritage or background. Your Overall (225) % 52% 11.6% 1.8%0.9% Administration (33) % 51.5% 6.1%0%0% Faculty (64) % 31.3% 10.9% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 42.1% 31.6% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 67.6% 8.1% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 63.8% 13.8% 1.7%0%
24 / 46. Faculty, administration and staff work together to ensure the success of institution programs and initiatives. Your Overall (221) % 42.5% 29% 4.1%1.8% Administration (33) % 45.5% 27.3% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 21.9% 0%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 29.4% 47.1% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 43.2% 29.7% 8.1% 2.7% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 41.1% 35.7% 7.1%1.8% 47. My supervisor/department chair supports my efforts to balance my work and personal life. Your Overall (224) % 37.9% 7.1%2.2%2.7% Administration (33) % 39.4% 3%3%3% Faculty (64) % 28.1% 4.7%1.6%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 41.2% 11.8% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 44.7% 5.3%0%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 41.4% 12.1% 5.2%1.7%
25 / 48. Senior leadership regularly models this institution's values. Your Overall (223) % 40.8% 24.7% 4%2.7% Administration (33) % 39.4% 24.2% 0%6.1% Faculty (64) % 31.3% 18.8% 4.7%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 33.3% 33.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 47.4% 23.7% 5.3%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 48.2% 30.4% 5.4%0% 49. This institution actively contributes to the community. Your Overall (225) % 44.9% 13.3% 2.7%0% Administration (33) % 39.4% 12.1% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 37.5% 7.8% 3.1%0% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 47.4% 10.5% 5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 59.5% 16.2% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 48.3% 17.2% 3.4%0%
26 / 50. This institution places sufficient emphasis on having diverse faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (220) % 51.4% 15.9% 4.1%0.5% Administration (33) % 54.5% 18.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 45.3% 10.9% 6.3%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 23.5% 35.3% 5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) % 58.3% 25% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 55.4% 12.5% 3.6%0% 51. There is appropriate recognition of innovative and high quality teaching. Your Overall (163) % 52.8% 20.2% 4.3%3.7% Administration (28) % 64.3% 7.1%3.6%0% Faculty (63) % 39.7% 22.2% 6.3%4.8% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 37.5% 37.5% 12.5% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (19) % 63.2% 21.1% 0%5.3% Non-exempt Staff (27) % 63% 22.2% 0%3.7%
27 / 52. We celebrate significant milestones and important accomplishments at this institution. Your Overall (220) % 52.7% 15.5% 4.1%1.4% Administration (33) % 42.4% 18.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 51.6% 9.4% 3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 41.2% 23.5% 11.8% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 64.9% 13.5% 5.4%0% Non-exempt Staff (55) % 56.4% 18.2% 1.8%0% 53. This institution's policies and practices give me the flexibility to manage my work and personal life. Your Overall (224) % 46.4% 12.9% 1.3%0.9% Administration (33) % 54.5% 18.2% 0%0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 6.3%3.1%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 58.8% 5.9%0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 50% 10.5% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 43.1% 19% 1.7%0%
28 / 54. This institution has clear and effective procedures for dealing with discrimination. Your Overall (217) % 59.4% 11.1% 1.4%1.4% Administration (33) % 60.6% 15.2% 0%0% Faculty (59) % 50.8% 8.5% 1.7%3.4% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 64.7% 0%5.9%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 68.4% 7.9% 0%2.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 58.9% 17.9% 1.8%0% 55. There is regular and open communication among faculty, administration and staff. Your Overall (220) % 28.2% 36.4% 10.9% 3.6% Administration (33) % 27.3% 39.4% 9.1% 0% Faculty (64) % 31.3% 21.9% 9.4% 1.6% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 29.4% 41.2% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (36) % 22.2% 36.1% 22.2% 5.6% Non-exempt Staff (56) % 26.8% 51.8% 7.1%5.4%
29 / 56. I believe what I am told by senior leadership. Your Overall (225) % 40.4% 21.3% 5.3%6.7% Administration (33) % 33.3% 30.3% 0% 9.1% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 18.8% 4.7%6.3% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 44.4% 11.1% 0%5.6% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 50% 15.8% 13.2% 7.9% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 43.1% 22.4% 5.2%6.9% 57. This institution is well run. Your Overall (226) % 41.2% 27.4% 6.6%1.8% Administration (33) % 42.4% 24.2% 6.1%3% Faculty (64) % 26.6% 25% 6.3%3.1% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 57.9% 15.8% 5.3%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 42.1% 39.5% 7.9% 0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 48.3% 25.9% 8.6% 1.7%
30 / 58. There's a sense that we're all on the same team at this institution. Your Overall (224) % 29% 31.3% 12.1% 7.1% Administration (33) % 24.2% 39.4% 12.1% 3% Faculty (64) % 25% 21.9% 12.5% 4.7% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 41.2% 29.4% 5.9%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 28.9% 31.6% 15.8% 13.2% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 31% 34.5% 12.1% 10.3% 59. This institution's culture is special - something you don't find just anywhere. Your Overall (225) % 45.3% 17.3% 5.8%1.8% Administration (33) % 45.5% 12.1% 0%3% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 17.2% 3.1%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (18) % 38.9% 22.2% 5.6%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 57.9% 15.8% 10.5% 2.6% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 51.7% 19% 6.9%1.7%
31 / 60. All things considered, this is a great place to work. Your Overall (226) % 38.5% 13.7% 3.1%0.4% Administration (33) % 33.3% 15.2% 3%0% Faculty (64) % 21.9% 17.2% 4.7%1.6% Adjunct Faculty (19) % 36.8% 26.3% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (38) % 52.6% 7.9% 2.6%0% Non-exempt Staff (58) % 48.3% 10.3% 1.7%0% 61. As a faculty member, I believe the College adequately supports scholarship. Your Overall (101) % 39.6% 18.8% 6.9%3% Administration (14) % 64.3% 14.3% 14.3% 0% Faculty (64) % 34.4% 21.9% 4.7%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (15) % 46.7% 13.3% 6.7%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff (1) 5 100% 0%0%0%0% Non-exempt Staff (4) % 25% 25% 0%0%
32 / 62. As a faculty member, I believe faculty who stay at UVA-Wise are better off than those who leave. Your Overall (100) % 26% 35% 14% 5% Administration (14) % 42.9% 21.4% 14.3% 14.3% Faculty (62) % 24.2% 35.5% 17.7% 3.2% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 25% 43.8% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (1) 3 0%0% 100% 0%0% Non-exempt Staff (4) 4 50% 25% 0% 25% 0% 63. As a faculty member, I believe the tenure and promotion process is comprehensible. Your Overall (85) % 41.2% 23.5% 7.1%4.7% Administration (11) % 63.6% 27.3% 0%0% Faculty (58) % 32.8% 24.1% 8.6% 5.2% Adjunct Faculty (10) % 60% 20% 10% 0% Exempt Prof'l Staff - - Non-exempt Staff (4) % 50% 0%0% 25%
33 / 64. As a faculty member, I believe the tenure and promotion process is equitable. Your Overall (86) % 44.2% 26.7% 5.8%5.8% Administration (11) % 54.5% 27.3% 9.1% 0% Faculty (58) % 43.1% 22.4% 5.2% 8.6% Adjunct Faculty (11) % 36.4% 54.5% 0%0% Exempt Prof'l Staff - - Non-exempt Staff (4) % 50% 0% 25% 0% 65. I believe a culture of open discussion and debate exists at the College. Your Overall (202) % 41.6% 31.2% 6.9%2% Administration (30) % 50% 16.7% 10% 0% Faculty (64) % 40.6% 18.8% 6.3%4.7% Adjunct Faculty (16) % 31.3% 37.5% 0%6.3% Exempt Prof'l Staff (34) % 44.1% 41.2% 8.8% 0% Non-exempt Staff (46) % 34.8% 50% 6.5%0%
34 / 66. I believe decisions affecting the College are arrived at in an open manner and understood by the college community. Your Overall (212) % 34% 34.9% 10.4% 6.6% Administration (30) % 43.3% 26.7% 13.3% 0% Faculty (64) % 32.8% 23.4% 9.4% 10.9% Adjunct Faculty (17) % 35.3% 41.2% 0%5.9% Exempt Prof'l Staff (37) % 21.6% 54.1% 10.8% 8.1% Non-exempt Staff (51) % 35.3% 39.2% 11.8% 5.9%
Great Colleges to Work For. Institutional Research and Information Tim Stanley, Associate Director Taylor Lovell, Research Analyst
Great Colleges to Work For Institutional Research and Information Tim Stanley, Associate Director Taylor Lovell, Research Analyst Purpose UVU participated in the Great Colleges to Work For survey in order
More information2018 UNC System Employee Engagement. Survey Results
UNC System Employee Engagement Survey Results UNC System Strategic Plan Human Capital Goal The University will systematically focus on recruitment, retention, and development of the most talented and diverse
More informationThe University of Tennessee Knoxville 2011 Great Colleges Survey
The University of Tennessee Knoxville 2011 Great Colleges Survey Richard K. Boyer March 21, 2011 Session Objectives Provide an introduction to ModernThink LLC and an overview of The Chronicle of Higher
More informationOverview of Reports Survey Results
Overview of Reports Survey Results Metropolitan State University of Denver Campus Climate Survey Spring 2015 Prepared by: 2 Mill Road, Suite 102 Wilmington, DE 19806 Phone: 888.684.4658 Fax: 888.684.4659
More informationUniversity of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall
2017 Engagement Survey Definition of Terms 3WEEKS of survey administration September 6 th 27 th 99% Response rate 86% in 2015 121 responded to the survey 1 Comment Question Sustainable Engagement: 85%
More informationBenchmark Data Package Report Overview
Benchmark Data Package University of Texas Pan American Prepared by: ModernThink, LLC 4519 Weldin Road Wilmington, DE 19803 Phone: 888.684.4658 Fax: 302.764.4497 www.modernthink.com Page 1 Introduction
More information2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey. New Mexico State University
2014 Employee Satisfaction Survey New Mexico State University Total number of employees at NMSU, all locations = 3,938 Total number of clicks of interest = 2,314 Number of useable responses = 1,668 Number
More informationTHE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED
THE 10 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED Metric 1: PERSONAL GROWTH The Personal Growth Metric represents the level of autonomy employees have, whether or not they re improving their skills and if they
More informationCOLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Laramie County Community College - Spring 2016 Respondents. Mean
Section 1: Campus Culture and Policies IMPORTANCE SATISFACTION RATE IMPORTANCE (1 = "Not important at all" / 5 = "Very important") AND SATISFACTION (1 = "Not satisfied at all" / 5 = "Very satisfied") GAP
More informationInstitutional Climate Update
Institutional Climate Update Board of Trustees Thursday, June 1, 2017 Presented by Clyde W. Pickett, Ed.D. 1 Overview Coordination: Office of Institutional Diversity and Inclusion Office of Planning and
More information2017 Engagement Survey. Results Overview
UK@Work Engagement Survey Results Overview Survey Overview 3WEEKS of survey administration September 6 th 27 th 62% Response rate 48% in 2015 5,269 responded to the survey (Staff: 4,093 Faculty: 1,176)
More informationModernThink Employee Engagement Survey Summary Report
ModernThink Employee Engagement Survey 2018 Summary Report Prepared for the Office of the Provost Prepared by the Office of Institutional Research August 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary.. 2 About
More informationUniversity of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. College of Ag, Food and Environment Overall
2017 Engagement Survey Definition of Terms 2 How to Read Results Scores Scores shown are the total Percent (typically the top two options). For example: Agree Tend to Agree? Responses Tend to Disagree
More informationCOLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS. A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: STRATEGIC PLANNING AND REPORTING
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: 2010 2015 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND REPORTING December 2009 Challenge 1 Developing a Shared and Inclusive Understanding of Diversity
More informationCoconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey
Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey Summary Report Fourth Annual Opinion Survey Conducted via telephone and online Spring 2003 Survey Background 57 Questions in the survey. Includes comment
More informationTHE DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE-TUCSON, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MENTORING PROGRAM
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE-TUCSON, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MENTORING PROGRAM Goals The goals of the Department of Surgery mentoring program are: To create an environment that encourages and enables success of our
More informationEquitable Access and Success for Students Human Resources Awareness and Celebration of Diverse Cultures
November 2011 Introduction The 2010 Cultural Climate Survey was administered in response to the need for a current study on campus climate and cultural competency to support SDCCD s commitment to diversity
More informationCHRONICLE GREAT COLLEGE TO WORK FOR 2016
CHRONICLE GREAT COLLEGE TO WORK FOR University of Idaho AUGUST 25, DALE PIETRZAK, ED.D., DIRECTOR Institutional Research and Assessment Contents Introduction to Overall... 2 Overall Strengths: Performance
More informationGeneral Information. 1. What department do you work for? 2. How long have you worked for the City? 3. Supervision: Do you supervise other employee(s)?
General Information 1. What department do you work for? Administrative Services City Attorney Community and Economic Development Community Services Court Executive Human Resources & Risk Management Police
More informationAugust 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1
August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1 CAC/MSOS (MPI) 1-50 Reference: 2009 Annual Report page 27. Preamble: In response to Goal 6, one of MPI s strategies is To continue to respond to the issues raised
More informationEquitable Access and Success for Students Human Resources Awareness and Celebration of Diverse Cultures
September 2011 Introduction The 2010 Cultural Climate Survey was administered in response to the need for a current study on campus climate and cultural competency to support SDCCD s commitment to diversity
More information2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS
2018 EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION 100% 95% 75% 65% 55% 86% 84% 65% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 Employee Survey Results Institutional Planning, Effectiveness, and
More informationDesign Recruitment and support of a diverse student population.
May 2011 Introduction Purpose To respond to the need for a current study on cultural competency in support of SDCCD s commitment to diversity as defined in Board Policy 7100. To meet WASC/ACCJC diversity
More information2017 CALS Employee Survey Results Executive Summary. Heather Roberts-Wrenn March 2017
2017 CALS Employee Survey Results Executive Summary Heather Roberts-Wrenn March 2017 Summary Of 1,375 CALS employees invited to participate on February 8 th, 2017 we received 454 usable survey responses
More informationEmployee Satisfaction Survey. Office of Institutional Research & Assessment
Employee Satisfaction Survey Office of Institutional Research & Assessment December, 2011 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary... 1 Appendices: Appendix A: Summary Data Figure 1: Average Importance
More informationEMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS March 2012 Office of the Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration Robert Pignatello 4th Annual JJC Employee Engagement Survey Summary Designed to obtain
More informationENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT
WSU VANCOUVER For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 49 respondents in compared to 30 respondents in who identified their department within WSU Vancouver. Within WSU Vancouver, the response
More informationSANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings
SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey Results and Findings Prepared by Dr. Hannah Lawler, Dean of Institutional Research March 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Santa Monica College (SMC)
More informationPellissippi State Community College. Performance Evaluation Process (Administrative and Support Staff)
Pellissippi State Community College Performance Evaluation Process (Administrative and Support Staff) January 2016 The Performance Evaluation Process serves as a formal mechanism for ensuring that all
More information2010 Employee Survey Results. May 2010
2010 Employee Survey Results May 2010 Response Rate Response rate was similar to previous CCC Employee Surveys Status Number Responding Response Rate Full Time 101 70% Part Time 46 19% Total 147 38% Responses
More informationSelf Assessment Guide for a Great Safety Culture
Self Assessment Guide for a Great Safety Culture Overview: Safety culture is in an intrinsic part of organization culture. Safety culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, and attitudes that influence
More informationInclusive Excellence at the University of Missouri System Framework Draft
Inclusive Excellence at the University of Missouri System 2016-2018 Framework Draft The Inclusive Excellence Framework reaffirms the University of Missouri System s commitment to growing and sustaining
More informationReport Employee Satisfaction Survey
Report Employee Satisfaction Survey Communication 1 In my company, there is open, honest communication. 2 My ideas and suggestions are heard and valued by upper management. 3 I receive adequate information
More informationGuide for Faculty Mentors
Guide for Faculty Mentors To receive an electronic copy of this document, send a request to lou.duarte@nyumc.org Updated: April 18, 2017 2017 NYU Langone Medical Center Contents Introduction: Goals & Responsibilities...3
More informationVOILAND COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE 2018
For the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) there were 103 respondents in compared to 52 respondents in 2016 who identified their department within the Voiland of Engineering and Architecture (VCEA). For,
More informationGoal 1: Prepare Students for Leading Roles in an Innovation-driven Economy and Global Society
Goal 1: Prepare Students for Leading Roles in an Innovation-driven Economy and Global Society Objective 1.1 Enroll more high-ability students from all societal segments. Strategy 1.1.1 Enhance marketing
More informationEMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY Customer Service Centre March 31, 2015 on behalf of TTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overall Engagement Score 14 Aspects of Employee Engagement 18 What Drives Engagement
More informationDartmouth College Employee Survey Results. April 27, 2006
Dartmouth College Employee Survey Results April 27, 2006 Goals and Objectives The Dartmouth College Employee Survey will help the administration: To better understand employees experience To identify employees
More informationBuilding a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government
Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government What We ll Cover 1. What is employee engagement and why does it matter? 2. Measuring engagement 3. Improving engagement 4. Creating an engagement
More informationFACULTY MENTORING RESOURCE BOOK-2012
FACULTY MENTORING RESOURCE BOOK-2012 OFFICE OF THE PROVOST UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE 1 Table of Contents 1. Purpose 3 2. Introduction.3 3. Importance of Mentoring 3 4. Faculty Development Needs Assessment
More informationNTID Faculty Workload Guidelines
Draft #8-FINAL April 4, 1997 NTID Faculty Workload Guidelines Background Recent efforts of NTID faculty and administration to review faculty workload guidelines are the direct result of internal and external
More informationFall 2017 Campus Climate and Diversity Survey
Fall 2017 Campus Climate and Diversity Survey Background and Implementation The Campus Climate and Diversity Survey for Faculty and Staff is a campus-wide assessment of diversity, inclusion, and workplace
More informationDraft Faculty Mentoring
Draft Faculty Mentoring This draft document begins the conversation of how to tailor a mentoring program for our college by offering two methods along a spectrum of possible vehicles for implementation
More informationFaculty Mentorship. April 26, 2016.
Faculty Mentorship April 26, 2016. COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE, DESIGN, AND THE ARTS Faculty Mentorship Presentation FORMS OF FACULTY MENTORSHIP 1. Faculty Mentoring Plan 2. P+T Seminar 3. Grants Seminar 4.
More informationStrategic Diversity Plan
Strategic Diversity Plan 2017-2022 Policy Statements Equal Employment Opportunity Policy Statement Regarding Gender Discrimination Policy Statement Regarding Discrimination Shared Values Integrity We act
More informationINDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP)
INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP) An Individual Development Plan (IDP) is an essential planning document that identifies your goals and objectives. It is expected that all graduate students will utilize
More informationEMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY COO's Office/DCOO's Office/Operations Control March 30, 2015 on behalf of TTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overall Engagement Score 10 Aspects of Employee Engagement 14 Overall
More informationAccountability and Development Review
Accountability and Development Review Policy Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Scope 1 3 Benefits 1 4 Statement of Policy and Key Principles 2 5 Process 2 5.1 Self-Review 3 5.2 Review Meeting 3 5.3 Following
More informationGENDER PAY GAP REPORT
GENDER PAY GAP REPORT 2017 UEA Gender Pay Gap Report 2017 2 UEA WELCOMES THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUBLISH THIS FIRST REPORT ON THE GENDER PAY GAP. At UEA we are proud to provide the facilities and the working
More informationWhat We ve Done to Date: A status report to employees on progress made on the 2004 employee survey
What We ve Done to Date: A status report to employees on progress made on the 2004 employee survey One year ago, the results of the first employee survey were released and government made some commitments
More informationEmployer handbook for. Internships. We are in the business of building successful futures. TM
Employer handbook for Internships Our mission is to support careers by bridging the gap between business students and the business community through internship and placement opportunities. internship Who
More informationCurrent Practices in Faculty Mentoring at RIT: A Summary of 2013 Questionnaire Results November 15, 2013
: A Summary of 2013 Questionnaire Results vember 15, 2013 Anne Marie Canale Cheryl Herdklotz Lynn Wild Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Questionnaire Results... 4 General Information on College
More informationInternship. design an. Creating a valuable experience for employers and students. Establishing an Internship or Co-op Program 2 3
Creating a valuable experience for employers and students. Internship design an C O N T E N T S Establishing an Internship or Co-op Program 2 3 Guidelines Benchmarks of Quality Supervising Your Student
More informationStaff Survey september - october 2016 results. Voice Project
Staff Survey september - october 2016 results Voice Project report overview This report on the 2016 Edith Cowan University Staff Survey: Assesses multiple indicators of Edith Cowan University's performance
More informationGenerational Differences Quiz
Generational Differences Quiz Self Quiz Circle the description that best describes your perception of work in each row. Then, add up your score for all columns. Attitude toward work assignments Role of
More informationDeveloping a Culture of Collaboration Through Employee Engagement
Developing a Culture of Collaboration Through Employee Engagement HR@UW CONFERENCE Developing a Culture of Collaboration Bob Lavigna Director, Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement What We ll
More informationDepartment of Facilities Management Equity Action Plan
Department of Facilities Management Equity Action Plan Organization: Division of Maintenance As Of: March 2014 Foreword The Department of Facilities Management (DFM) is committed to the tenets of the Montgomery
More informationOrganizational Integration of Part-Time Faculty Teaching Developmental Mathematics. Sylvia Gray, Researcher September 15, 2017
Organizational Integration of Part-Time Faculty Teaching Developmental Mathematics Sylvia Gray, Researcher September 15, 2017 Introduction In 1969 about 78% full-time tenured or tenure-track 22% were non-tenure-track
More informationEmployee Opinion Survey
Employee Opinion Survey Canutillo Independent School District April 6, 2017 Catherine Rubiera Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Background... 2 Survey Administration and Respondents... 2 Major Findings...
More informationVision Human Resources
Vision 2020 Human Resources Welcome from the Director Mission: We will provide high-quality, added value service that will attract and support our people. Imperial College HR will be an exemplar of excellence
More informationDartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey
Dartmouth College 2008 Staff Survey Data Analysis Solutions Prepared for: Dartmouth College Survey Overview Revised survey allowed for new questions and comparison to results from the 2006 Dartmouth College
More informationPlant the SEEDS for your College s Future Using a Competency-Based Performance Management System. Presented by Alexa Bazley & Kaye Waugh
1 Plant the SEEDS for your College s Future Using a Competency-Based Performance Management System Presented by Alexa Bazley & Kaye Waugh A-B Tech background Location: Asheville, North Carolina Employees:
More informationP a g e 1. Growing through people. 1. What is Performance for Growth (P4G)?
P a g e 1 1. What is Performance for Growth (P4G)? P4G is a framework that provides the opportunity for all UCD employees to have at least one annual conversation with their line manager, Head of School
More informationENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM
NO. 3072 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM 1.0 POLICY STATEMENT: Oklahoma City Community College (OCCC) provides and maintains working conditions that comply with federal, state and local standards
More informationITS. All-Staff Strategic Planning Launch. July 9 & 16, 2018
ITS All-Staff Strategic Planning Launch July 9 & 16, 2018 + Expectations for the day + Agenda Introduction Living Our Core Values Progress Update - Strategic Planning Envisioning the Future Wrap up + Introductions
More informationDO YOU WANT A MENTOR?
DO YOU WANT A MENTOR? TABLE OF CONTENTS I THINK I WANT A MENTOR--AM I READY?...2 HOW TO FIND A MENTOR THAT IS RIGHT FOR YOU...3 TIPS FOR A SUCCESSFUL RELATIONSHIP...4 THE GOALS ARE ACHIEVED--WHAT NEXT?...6
More informationEMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY Subway Extensions (Spadina/Scar.) March 24, 2015 on behalf of TTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overall Engagement Score 10 Aspects of Employee Engagement 14 Overall Organizational
More informationStaff Survey Feedback 2012
Staff Survey Feedback 2012 In July 2012 Brisbane Catholic Education conducted a staff survey involving all schools within the Archdiocese. The purpose of the survey is to promote and inform discussions
More informationNEW COLLEGE LEICESTER. Policy for the Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) at New College Leicester
NEW COLLEGE LEICESTER Policy for the Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) at New College Leicester 2017-2018 Policy for the Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers (NQTs) at New College Leicester
More informationHuman Capital. Date of Report. Theme Group Name. Members. Introduction. Innovation. February 2, Human Capital
Date of Report February 2, 2018 Theme Group Name Human Capital Members Co-Chair 1: On-Campus Faculty: Roy Issa Co-Chair 2: Off-Campus: Puff Niegos Facilitator: David Kohler Resource: Nancy Hampton Off-Campus
More informationInstitutional Strengths. Improvement Opportunities & Implementation Suggestions. Institutional Summary
Institutional Summary As part of RMUoHP s comprehensive institutional assessment and continuous improvement process, the purpose of the annual Employee Engagement Survey is to collect institutional data
More informationMetropolitan Community College Omaha, Nebraska
Metropolitan Community College Omaha, Nebraska Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Custom Report by Katie Ratterree & Alessandra Dinin The National Initiative for Leadership & Institutional
More informationCSC MERIT POLICY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER Revised, 6/12/14
CSC MERIT POLICY COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER Revised, 6/12/14 PURPOSE This policy outlines Community Service Center (CSC) procedures for determining and assigning merit raises, when available. 1. Full Inclusion
More informationBuilding a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government
Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government Introduction Bob Lavigna Director Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement CPS HR Consulting 2 What We ll Cover 1. What is employee engagement
More informationWilliam & Mary 2015 Employee Climate Survey
Summary Report umber of Respondents: 155 Page 0 Page 1 eutral W&M As A Place To Work 1. Considering your experience here as well as what you know of other organizations, how would you rate William & Mary
More informationNAVIGATING THROUGH ACADEMIC CAREER PATHS: A MENTORING CONTINUUM
NAVIGATING THROUGH ACADEMIC CAREER PATHS: A MENTORING CONTINUUM ORIENTATION EARLY SOCIALIZATION ESTABLISHING CREDENTIALS MID-CAREER/ MID-DEGREE TRANSITIONS to the unit establishing ongoing relationship
More informationThe Red Book Code of Business Conduct
The Red Book Code of Business Conduct Our medicines can improve people s health profoundly. Whether they know us by name or not, our customers count on each of us at Lilly, in our own ways, to help them
More informationCampus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness
Campus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness Background Within the last decade, SDSU has sought to create a healthy and welcoming campus community. Students, employees, and constituents contribute
More informationSample Company. Bringing Best Practices, Engagement Programs, and Outstanding Results to HR Departments. New Hire Surveys: *Dates.
Bringing Best Practices, Engagement Programs, and Outstanding Results to HR Departments Sample Company New Hire Surveys: *Dates 53 Employees 44 Responses Response Rate McLean & Company 1 Interpreting the
More informationAnalyzing Employee Survey Data. Task Force on Race and Race Relations February 2016
Analyzing Employee Survey Data Task Force on Race and Race Relations February 2016 Employee Survey Emailed to 2,765 employees. Faculty were included for the first time. 71% response rate (n=1,955) Higher
More information2015 Staff Senate Survey Results
2015 Staff Senate Survey Results Overall Results The 2015 results, for the most part, continue the increasing satisfaction levels shown in the 2014 survey results. Staff are proud to work for WCU, are
More information2016 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results
216 Survey of Employee Engagement Work Group Results 1 216 Survey of Employee Engagement - Work Group Results The Survey of Employee Engagement (SEE) is conducted every two years at Texas A&M University
More information2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS JULY 2016 Survey Administered by the Institutional Effectiveness Committee March-June 2016 Report Prepared by the Office of Institutional Advancement Data Support
More informationVery. dissatisfied. Somewhat. dissatisfied 11% Somewhat. satisfied 42%
About the 2016 Employee Survey The first Cornell Employee Survey in 2011 was a response to a resolution from the Employee Assembly calling for a study to better understand staff engagement. This second
More information2017 Merritt College Employee Satisfaction Survey
2017 Merritt Employee Satisfaction Survey Merritt Executive Summary In spring 2017, Merritt administered the Noel Levitz Employee Satisfaction Survey to all faculty, staff and administrators. This survey
More informationThis report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2.
This report was obtained (via FOIA) and posted by AltGov2 www.altgov2.org/fevs 2014 CFPB annual employee survey December 2014 Introduction Interpretation of results More than 83 percent of the CFPB employee
More informationGender pay gap report 2017
Gender pay gap report 2017 Introduction Nick Hugh CEO Women should expect to have the same opportunities to advance their careers as men. It is not only right for society but for the success of our business.
More information2018 Employee Climate Survey
2018 Employee Climate Survey 2018 Employee Climate Survey Summary Employees were invited to take the 2018 campus climate survey between Oct. 15 and Nov. 9, 2018. The survey consisted of 79 questions. Thirty-four
More informationM. Patrice Eiff, MD Professor Director of Faculty Development- Family Medicine Director, SOM TALENT Program
M. Patrice Eiff, MD Professor Director of Faculty Development- Family Medicine Director, SOM TALENT Program Workshop Objectives Discuss tips for strategic career management. Reflect on your career strengths
More informationHLC Criteria and Core Component Crosswalk with AQIP Portfolio Processes
HLC Criteria and Core Component Crosswalk with AQIP Portfolio Processes General Guidelines for Using this Crosswalk The crosswalk below gives the connections between HLC Criteria/Core Components and AQIP
More informationSampleCo Organization Survey Results
SampleCo Organization Survey Results October 2009 Profile Report (This report was created on 5/30/2017) Table of Contents 1 Introduction: High Performance Organizations 2 Understanding the Data 3 Overall
More informationBUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION DECEMBER 2018 2018 BCFP Annual Employee Survey Results Introduction Interpretation of results More than 72 percent of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
More informationUVM Extension Workforce Diversity Recruiting and Retention Plan: 2012
UVM Extension Workforce Diversity Recruiting and Retention Plan: 2012 Summary All Search Committee Chairs and members are provided a copy of this document and the University Diversity Workforce Recruitment
More informationAssignment of Responsibility
Assignment of Responsibility The tables below show who is responsible for implementing the strategies and action items for each goal of the Plan. 1) Recruit, support and retain a diverse student body Key
More informationGender Differences in Pathways to Career Satisfaction
Gender Differences in Pathways to Career Satisfaction Heather Doty Assist. Prof., Mechanical Engineering Robin Andreasen Assoc. Prof., Linguistics & Cognitive Science Dandan Chen Ph.D. Candidate, School
More informationOVERVIEW. Relationship Between Versatility and Diversity Among Leaders
A T R A C O M G R O U P W H I T E P A P E R Relationship Between Versatility and Diversity Among Leaders OVERVIEW In a study of 143 managers at a large multinational defense contractor, we found that managers
More informationInclusive Excellence at MU Framework Draft
Inclusive Excellence at MU 2016-2020 Framework Draft The Inclusive Excellence Framework reaffirms the University of Missouri s commitment to growing and sustaining a diverse and inclusive learning, living,
More informationI. Introduction. Diversity Strategic Plan v4 1
Administrative Department/Unit/Division: Texas State University Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan Administrative Support Plan 2017-2023 [Final June 2017] I. Introduction State your administrative
More information