Large-Scale Channel Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6460) (Modified procedure used for vegetated channel tests)
|
|
- George Pope
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Large-Scale Channel Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6460) (Modified procedure used for vegetated channel tests) of North American Green s ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM over Loam December 2011 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C Attn: Evan Rothblatt, NTPEP erothblatt@aashto.org Submitted by: TRI/Environmental, Inc Bee Caves Road Austin, TX C. Joel Sprague Project Manager
2 December 12, 2011 Mr. Evan Rothblatt AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C Subject: Channel Testing over Loam of North American Green ShoreMax Mats over P550- TRM manufactured in Poseyville, IN. Dear Mr. Rothblatt: This letter report presents the results for large-scale channel erosion tests performed on ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over loam. Included are data developed for target hydraulic shears ranging from 0.5 to 11.8 psf (0.02 to 0.52 kpa) for the unvegetated condition and from 1 to 12.5 psf (0.04 to 0.55 kpa) for the vegetated condition. All testing work was performed in general accordance with the ASTM D 6460, Standard Test Method for Determination of Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Performance in Protecting Earthen Channels from Stormwater-Induced Erosion. The procedure was modified to use only single replicates when testing vegetated channels. Generated results were used to develop the following permissible or limiting shear (τ limit ) and limiting velocity (V limit ) for the tested material: ShoreMax Mats & 9.0 staples/sy over P550-TRM & 2.25 staples/sy Product Unvegetated 6+ Week Vegetated 1+ Year Vegetated Condition Condition Condition Actual growth period, wks τ limit * 12.5+* V limit * 26+* + = At maximum available flow, the tested system had not reached failure (i.e. > ½-in of soil loss). * = ASTM D 6460 requires that three test replicates be performed using identical procedures to obtain an average threshold of performance. Thus, the results of vegetated testing, being single replicates of each condition, cannot be considered as an average threshold of performance. TRI is pleased to present this final report. Please feel free to call if we can answer any questions or provide any additional information. Sincerely, C. Joel Sprague, P.E. Senior Engineer Geosynthetics Services Division cc: Sam Allen, Jarrett Nelson - TRI
3 ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page 3 CHANNEL TESTING REPORT ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam TESTING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES Overview of Test and Apparatus TRI/Environmental, Inc.'s (TRI's) large-scale channel erosion testing facility is located at the Denver Downs Research Farm in Anderson, SC. Testing oversight is provided by C. Joel Sprague, P.E. The large-scale testing is commonly performed in a rectangular flume having a 10% slope (unvegetated condition) or 20% slope (vegetated condition) using a loamy soil test section. All testing reported herein was performed in flumes having a 20% slope. The concentrated flow is produced by raising gates to allow gravity flow from an adjacent pond. At least four sequential, increasing flows are applied to each test section for 30 minutes (unvegetated condition) or 1 hour (vegetated condition) each to achieve a range of hydraulic shear stresses in order to define the permissible, or limiting, shear stress, τ limit, which is the shear stress necessary to cause an average of 0.5 inch of soil loss over the entire channel bottom. Testing is performed in accordance with ASTM D 6460, though the procedure was modified to use only single replicates when testing vegetated channels. Tables and graphs of shear versus soil loss are generated from the accumulated data. Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) The following information and index properties were determined from the supplied product. Table 1. Tested Product Information & Index Properties Product Information and Index Property / Test Units Values Product Identification - ShoreMax P550 TRM Manufacturer - North American Green North American Green Manufacturing Plant Location - Poseyville, IN Poseyville, IN Lot number of sample Mat / Fiber - Natural rubber polypropylene Netting Openings in n/a 0.5 in x 0.5 in Stitching Spacing in n/a 1.5 in Tensile Strength MD x XD (ASTM D 6818) lb/in 38.3 x x 75.3 Tensile Elongation MD x XD (ASTM D 6818) % x x 24.7 Thickness (ASTM D 6525) mils Light Penetration (ASTM D 6567) % cover Density Net Only (ASTM D 792, Method A) g/cm Test Soil Mass / Unit Area (ASTM D 6475) oz/sy The test soil used in the test plots had the following characteristics.
4 ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page 4 Table 2. TRI-Loam Characteristics Soil Characteristic Test Method Value % Gravel 0 % Sand 45 ASTM D 422 % Silt 35 % Clay 20 Liquid Limit, % 41 ASTM D 4318 Plasticity Index, % 8 Soil Classification USDA Loam Soil Classification USCS Sandy silty clay (ML-CL) Preparation of the Test Channels The initial channel soil veneer (12-inch thick minimum) is placed and compacted. Compaction is verified to be 90% (± 3%) of Proctor Standard density using ASTM D 698 (sand cone method). The test channels undergo a standard preparation procedure prior to each test. First, any rills or depressions resulting from previous testing are filled in with test soil. The soil surface is replaced to a depth of 1 inch and groomed to create a channel bottom that is level side-to-side and at a smooth slope top-to-bottom. Finally, a vibrating plate compactor is run over the renewed channel surface. If a vegetated condition is to be tested, grass seed (tall fescue) is applied to the plot at the rate of 500 seeds per square foot. The submitted erosion control product is then installed using the anchors and anchorage pattern directed by the client. Installation of Erosion Control Product in Test Channel As noted, the submitted erosion control product is installed as directed by the client. For the tests reported herein, the erosion control product was anchored using a diamond anchorage patterns. The ShoreMax anchorage consisted of 2 x 12 steel staples to create an anchorage density of approximately 9 staples per square yard. The P550-TRM anchorage consisted of 2 x 10 steel staples to create an anchorage density of approximately 2.25 staples per square yard. Specific Test Procedure Immediately prior to testing, the initial soil surface elevation readings are made at predetermined cross-sections. The channel is then exposed to sequential 30-minute (unvegetated condition) or 1-hour (vegetated condition) flows having target hydraulic shear stresses selected to create at least three flow events below and one flow event above the shear stress level that results in a cummulative average soil loss of ½-inch. During the testing, flow depth and corresponding flow measurements are taken at the predetermined cross-section locations. Between flow events, the flow is stopped and soil surface elevation measurements are made to facilitate calculation of soil loss. The flow is then restarted at the next desired flow (shear) level. Pictures of typical channel flows and resulting soil/vegetation loss are shown in Figures 7 thru 12.
5 ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page 5 Figure 1. Typical 10% Flumes on Left; 20% Flumes on Right Figure 4. Unvegetated RECP Figure Week Vegetated Shear in 20% Flumes; Recirculation Pump in Background Figure Week Vegetated RECP Figure 3. Typical 20% Temporary Flume Set Up 1+ Year Vegetated Shear Plots Figure Year Vegetated RECP
6 ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page 6 Figure 7. Typical Flow in Unvegetated Channel Figure 10. Unvegetated Channel after Test with Product Removed (typical) Figure 8. Typical Flow in 6+ Week Vegetated Channel Figure Week Vegetated Channel after Test (typical) Figure 9. Typical Flow in 1+ Year Vegetated Channel Figure Year Vegetated Channel after Test (typical)
7 ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page 7 TEST RESULTS Average soil loss and the associated hydraulic shear calculated from flow and depth measurements made during the testing are the principle data used to determine the performance of the product tested. This data is entered into a spreadsheet that transforms the flow depth and velocity into an hydraulic shear stress and the soil loss measurements into an average Clopper Soil Loss Index (CSLI). Measured and calculated data is summarized in Table 3. A graph of shear versus soil loss for the protected condition is shown in Figure 13. The associated velocities and time of vegetation growth are plotted in Figures 14 and 15, respectively. The graphs include the best regression line fit to the test data to facilitate a determination of the limiting shear stress, τ limit,, and limiting velocity, V limit,. The 0.5-inch intercept values are provided in Table 4. Test # (Channel # - Shear Level) Table 3. Summary Data Table Protected Test Reach Actual Growth Period (wks) Flow depth (in) Flow velocity (fps) Flow (cfs) Manning s roughness, n Max Bed Shear Cumm. CSLI (in) C1-S1, Unvegetated C1-S2, Unvegetated C1-S3, Unvegetated C1-S4, Unvegetated C1-S5, Unvegetated C2-S1, Unvegetated C2-S2, Unvegetated C2-S3, Unvegetated C2-S4, Unvegetated C3-S1, Unvegetated C3-S2, Unvegetated C3-S3, Unvegetated C3-S4, Unvegetated C3-S5, Unvegetated # S1, 6+ Wk Vegetated S2, 6+ Wk Vegetated S3, 6+ Wk Vegetated S4, 6+ Wk Vegetated S5, 6+ Wk Vegetated S1, 1+ Yr Vegetated S2, 1+ Yr Vegetated S3, 1+ Yr Vegetated S4, 1+ Yr Vegetated S5, 1+ Yr Vegetated # Test stopped early for impending failure. Not used in regression. Table 4. ShoreMax Mats & 9.0 staples/sy over P550-TRM & 2.25 staples/sy Product Unvegetated 6+ Week Vegetated 1+ Year Vegetated Actual growth period, wks τ limit * 12.5+* V limit * 26+* + = At maximum available flow, the tested system had not reached failure (i.e. > ½-in of soil loss). * = ASTM D 6460 requires that three test replicates be performed using identical procedures to obtain an average threshold of performance. Thus, the results of vegetated testing, being single replicates of each condition, cannot be considered as an average threshold of performance.
8 Cummulative Soil Loss (CSLI), in Cummulative Soil Loss (CSLI), in ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page Limiting Shear via ASTM D Staples/SY Staples/SY Unveg. Channel 1 Unveg. Channel 2 Unveg. Channel 3 With 8 Weeks of Vegetation With 60 Weeks of Vegetation All Unvegetated Channels Poly. (With 8 Weeks of Vegetation) Poly. (With 60 Weeks of Vegetation) Poly. (All Unvegetated Channels) y = x x x R² = Limiting Shear = 8.6 psf y = x x x R² = Limiting Shear = psf y = x x x R² = Limiting Shear = psf Shear, psf Figure 13. Shear Stress vs. Soil Loss Tested Product y = x x x R² = Limiting Velocity via ASTM D Staples/SY Staples/SY Unvegetated #1 Unvegetated #2 Unvegetated #3 All Unveg. Channels With 8 Weeks of Vegetation With 60 Weeks of Vegetation Poly. (All Unveg. Channels) Poly. (With 8 Weeks of Vegetation) Poly. (With 60 Weeks of Vegetation) 1.5 Limiting Velocity = 19.5 ft/sec y = x x R² = Limiting Velocity = ft/sec y = 7E-05x x x R² = Limiting Velocity = 26+ ft/sec Velocity, ft/sec Figure 14. Velocity vs. Soil Loss Tested Product
9 Manning's n Permissible Shear, psf ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page Vegetation Loss vs Time of Vegetation Growth via ASTM D Staples/SY Staples/SY SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Weeks of Vegetation Growth Initial Vegetative Density (stems/ft 2 ) Final Vegetative Density (stems/ft 2 ) % of Initial Vegetation after Max. Shear (%) 0 33% 20% Permissible Shear Time of Vegetation Growth, weeks Figure 15. Shear Stress vs. Time of Vegetation Growth Tested Product 0.06 Manning's n vs. Water Depth 2.25 Staples/SY Staples/SY Unvegetated #1 Unvegetated #2 Unvegetated #3 All Unvegetated Channels With 8 Weeks of Vegetation With 60 Weeks of Vegetation Poly. (All Unvegetated Channels) y = -4E-05x x x R² = Water Depth, in Figure 16. Flow Depth vs. Manning s n Tested Product
10 Elevation Relative to Benchmark, ft Elevation Relative to Benchmark, ft Energy Grade Lines - All Shear Levels Unvegetated Channels ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page y = x y = x Shear Level 4 y = x y = x y = x Shear Level 3 y = x y = x y = x Shear Level 2 y = x y = x y = x Shear Level 1 Shear Level 5 y = x y = x y = x X-Section (ft along test reach) Channel 1 Channel 2 Channel 3 Figure 17a. Energy Grade Lines All Channels, Unvegetated Shears Tested Product Energy Grade Lines - All Shear Levels Vegetated Channels Wk Vegetated 60-Wk Vegetated Shear Level 5 y = x y = x Shear Level 4 y = x y = x Shear Level 3 y = x y = x Shear Level 2 y = x y = x Shear Level 1 y = x y = x X-Section (ft along test reach) Figure 17b. Energy Grade Lines All Channels, Vegetated Shears Tested Product
11 Cummulative Soil Loss (CSLI), in Percent of Initial Vegetation after Shear Stress, % Vegetation Loss vs Shear via ASTM D Staples/SY Staples/SY ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page % With 8 Weeks of Vegetation With 60 Weeks of Vegetation Poly. (With 8 Weeks of Vegetation) Poly. (With 60 Weeks of Vegetation) 90.0% 80.0% Initial 8-Week Vegetative Stand = 341 stems/ft 2 y = x x x + 1 R² = % 60.0% 50.0% Initial 60-Week Vegetative Stand = 471 stems/ft 2 y = x x x + 1 R² = % 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Shear, psf Figure 18. Vegetation vs. Shear Stress Tested Product y = x x x R² = Limiting Shear via ASTM D 6460 Control Runs Unvegetated With 6 Weeks of Vegetation With 61 Weeks of Vegetation Poly. (Unvegetated) Poly. (With 6 Weeks of Vegetation) Poly. (With 61 Weeks of Vegetation) Limiting Shear = y = x x R² = Limiting Shear = 0.5 psf y = x x x R² = Limiting Shear = 8.0 psf Shear, psf Figure 19. Shear Stress vs. Soil Loss Controls (Vegetation Only / No RECP)
12 ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Page 12 Figure 20. Typical 6+ Week Control Vegetation-Only Before Testing Figure 22. Typical 1+ Year Control Vegetation-Only Before Testing Figure 21. Typical 6+ Week Control Vegetation-Only After Testing 5 Figure 23. Typical 1+ Year Control Vegetation-Only After Testing CONCLUSIONS Rectangular channel (flume) tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D 6460 using sandy loam soil protected with an RECP. Three replicates of the unvegetated condition and one replicate each of the 6+ week and 1+ year vegetated conditions were performed. Testing in a rectangular (vertical wall) channel was conducted to achieve increasing shear levels in an attempt to cause at least 0.5-inch of soil loss. Figure 13 shows the maximum bottom shear stress and associated soil loss from each flow event. Figure 14 presents the velocity versus soil loss. Figure 15 relates the permissible shear stress to the length of time the vegetation had been allowed to grow. Figure 16 relates channel liner roughness (Manning s n ) to flow depth. Together, this data describes the relevant performance characteristics of the tested RECP. It is important to note that ASTM D 6460, the procedure used to guide the testing reported herein, requires that three test replicates be performed using identical procedures to obtain an average threshold of performance. Thus, the results of the testing of vegetated channels reported herein, being single replicates of each condition, cannot be considered as an average threshold of performance. The data in Figures 17a, 17b, 18 and 19, the calculated energy grade lines for each channel and shear level, the retained vegetation at each shear level, and the control condition shear stress vs. soil loss relationships, are included to provide a reference for the reported test results.
13 ShoreMax Mats over P550-TRM, over Loam Channel Erosion Testing December 12, 2011 Appendix APPENDIX A RECORDED DATA Test Record Sheets (Note: Unvegetated Test Record Sheets are in a Separate Report)
14 2-1 CHANNEL 2 - SHEAR STRESS 1 Date: 11/15/10 Start Time: 1:15 PM End Time: 2:15 PM Soil: Loam Target Shear : 1.00 Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Outlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 2 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 2.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.0 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.0 Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 3.2 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 3.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft 25.5Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 3.4 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.0 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.0 Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 3.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.0 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.2 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.0 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.0 Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.6 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = -0.1 Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.1
15 2-2 CHANNEL 2 - SHEAR STRESS 2 Date: 11/15/10 Start Time: 2:45 PM End Time: 3:45 PM Soil: Loam Target Shear : 2.00 Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: 1500 rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Inlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 4 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.2 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.0 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.0 Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.0 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.0 Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.6 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.7 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.6 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.6 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = -0.1 Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.1
16 2-3 CHANNEL 2 - SHEAR STRESS 3 Date: 11/23/10 Start Time: 10:40 AM End Time: 11:40 AM Soil: Loam Target Shear : 4.50 Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Inlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 2 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 11.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.0 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.0 Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 11.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 12.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 11.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 11.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 12.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 11.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = 0.0 Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 12.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 12.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.3 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.3 Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 12.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 12.4 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.1 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = -0.2 Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.2
17 2-4 CHANNEL 2 - SHEAR STRESS 4 Date: 11/29/10 Start Time: 2:45 PM End Time: 3:45 PM Soil: Loam Target Shear : 6.00 Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Inlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 2 C = 0.00 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 15.3 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 15.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.0 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.1 Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 15.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.3 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.3 Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 15.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 16.0 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 16.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.3 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.3 Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 16.5 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.3 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.3 Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 16.8 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.3 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.3 Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 16.7 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.5 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.5 Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 17.0 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 17.0 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in -0.2 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in -0.2 Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = -0.2 Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.2
18 2-5 CHANNEL 2 - SHEAR STRESS 5 Date: 11/30/10 Start Time: 2:45 PM End Time: 3:45 PM Soil: Loam Target Shear : Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Inlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 2 C = 0.00 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.36
19 3-1 CHANNEL 3 - SHEAR STRESS 1 Date: 10/5/11 Start Time: 9:25 AM End Time: 10:25 AM Soil: Loam Target Shear : 2.00 Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Outlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 2 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.02 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.52 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.17 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.00 Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.71 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft 25.5Loss/Gain, in 0.09 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 5.07 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.10 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.00 Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 4.82 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.00 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 5.84 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 5.76 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 5.27 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.16 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.00 Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 5.64 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 5.89 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 6.16 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = 0.01 Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.06
20 3-2 CHANNEL 3 - SHEAR STRESS 2 Date: 10/5/11 Start Time: 11:18 AM End Time: 12:18 PM Soil: Loam Target Shear : 4.00 Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: 1500 rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Inlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 9.10 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = 9.46 Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.14 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in 0.00 Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.01 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.01 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in 0.08 Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.09
21 3-3 CHANNEL 3 - SHEAR STRESS 3 Date: 10/6/11 Start Time: 9:08 AM End Time: 10:08 AM Soil: Loam Target Shear : 8.00 Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Inlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 4 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.14
22 3-4 CHANNEL 3 - SHEAR STRESS 4 Date: 10/6/11 Start Time: 11:18 AM End Time: Soil: Loam Target Shear : Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Inlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 2.00 C = 0.00 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.24
23 3-5 CHANNEL 3 - SHEAR STRESS 5 Date: 11/4/11 Start Time: 11:18 AM End Time: Soil: Loam Target Shear : Slope: 20% 40 ft long flume 20 ft test section RECP: P550 + ShoreMax Anchorage: 1900 rpms 2 ft wide flume TEST DATA Inlet Weir Weir Channel Targets FLOW Water Depth, in Weir width (ft) = 2.00 C = 0.00 Water Velocity, ft/s ft A B C Flow Rate, cfs Cross-section 1 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 2 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 3 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 4 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 5 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 6 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 7 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 8 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 9 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 10 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = ft Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Cross-section 11 A B C 0.2d 0.6d 0.8d To Water Surf, cm To original Surface Elev, cm To eroded Surface Elev, cm Vavg (fps) = Soil Loss / Gain, cm navg = & 9.0 pins / sy Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Stress Clopper Soil Loss, cm Flow (cfs) = Avg Bottom Loss/Gain, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss, in Soil Loss / Gain, in Avg Bottom Loss/Gain per Cross-Section = Clopper Soil Loss, in Avg Clopper Soil Loss per Cross-Section = -0.39
24 Sample Period & Date (Plots Started: 10/3/10) Channel Product Vegetation Count 6-Week Vegetated P550+ShoreMax Zone # Stems Stems/ft 2 Blades* # Ht. Avg., in. Sample Vegetation Count Period & Channel 1-Year Vegetated Date (Plots Product P550+ShoreMax % of Started: # Initial 9/14/10) Zone # Stems Stems / ft 2 Blades* Ht. Avg., in. % of Initial Initial - 11/15/10 After Shear #1-11/15/10 After Shear #2-11/15/10 After Shear #3-11/23/10 After Shear #4-11/29/10 After Shear #5-11/30/ Initial /5/ Avg % Avg % After Shear # /5/ Avg % Avg % After Shear # /5/ Avg % Avg % After Shear # /6/ Avg % Avg % After Shear # /6/ Avg % Avg % After Shear # /4/ Avg % Avg % Sample Area: 3" x 3" = ft 2 Sample Area: 3" x 3" = ft 2
Vegetated Large-Scale Channel Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6460) (Modified procedure used for vegetated channel tests)
Vegetated Large-Scale Channel Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6460) (Modified procedure used for vegetated channel tests) of North American Green s P300, Double Net Poly Fiber Mat, over Loam May 2013 Submitted
More informationLarge-Scale Channel Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6460, modified) ErosionTech s ETPP-10, Double Net Synthetic Fiber Mat, over Loam
Large-Scale Channel Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6460, modified) of ErosionTech s ETPP-10, Double Net Synthetic Fiber Mat, over Loam December 2011 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite
More informationLarge-Scale Channel Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6460) (Modified procedure used for vegetated channel tests)
Large-Scale Channel Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6460) (Modified procedure used for vegetated channel tests) of East Coast Erosion Blanket ECP-3 Permanent Turf Reinforcement Mats over Loam December 2011 Submitted
More informationLarge-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) FLEXSTORM Inlet Filter
Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) of FLEXSTORM Inlet Filter February 2009 Submitted to: Inlet & Pipe Protection, Inc. 24137 W. 111 th St., Unit A Naperville, IL 60564 Attn: Mr.
More informationQuality Control, Quality Assurance and Performance Testing of ECPs. Erosion. Erosion Control
Testing and Specifying Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECPs) Presented by: C. J. (Joel) Sprague, TRI/Environmental, Inc., United States J. E. (Jay) Sprague, TRI s Denver Downs Research Facility, United
More informationLarge-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing Representing Exposure to Post-Construction Sediment Load. FLEXSTORM PC Inlet Filters
Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing Representing Exposure to Post-Construction Sediment Load of FLEXSTORM PC Inlet Filters November 2009 Submitted to: Inlet & Pipe Protection, Inc. 24137 W. 111
More informationTESTING AND SPECIFYING EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS
TESTING AND SPECIFYING EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS C. Joel Sprague, P.E. TRI/Environmental, Inc. PO Box 9192, Greenville, SC 29604 Phone: 864/242-2220; Fax: 864/242-3107; jsprague@tri-env.com James E. (Jay)
More informationUser Guide. Overview. March product innovation. NTPEP test reports contain data collected according to laboratory testing protocols
AASHTO/NTPEP Erosion Control Products User Guide Overview The National Transportation Product Evaluation Program (NTPEP) was developed to provide quality and responsive engineering to the testing and evaluation
More informationTechnical Note. Hydraulic Flow Capacity of Concrete Cloth
Introduction: Stormwater flow in drainage channel and flume applications may be subjected to high velocity water conditions generating high shear forces on the side slopes. These applications are designed
More informationManual for Erosion and Sediment Control Updates
Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control Updates Chapter 1 - The Erosion and Sedimentation Act of 1975 Minor revisions were made to content Existing pictures were replaced with new ones Chapter 2 Sediment
More informationSpecifications for the Selection and Application of Erosion Control Blanket on Slopes or Channels
Specifications for the Selection and Application of Erosion Control Blanket on Slopes or Channels Excel CS-3 All Natural - Provided by Western Excelsior PART I - GENERAL 1.01 Summary A. The Erosion Control
More informationRE: Bench-scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (Log # E )
Ms. Kellyn Hargett GeoHay, LLC PO Box 160040 Spartanburg, SC 29316 (info@geohay.com) RE: Bench-scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (Log # E2280-14-10) Dear Kellyn: TRI appreciates the opportunity to
More informationROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (RECP)
Supplemental Technical Specification for ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (RECP) SCDOT Designation: SC-M-815-9 (07/17) 1.0 Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECP) This Supplemental Specification replaces
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 836 SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL WITH TURF REINFORCING MAT January 18, 2013
836.01 Description 836.02 Materials 836.03 Construction 836.04 Maintenance 836.05 Method of Measurement 836.06 Basis of Payment STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 836
More informationEC-04 ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (RECP)
Greenville County Technical Specification EC-04 ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (RECP) 1.0 Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECP) 1.1 Description A variety of Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECP) are
More informationNTPEP Evaluation of Erosion Control Products (ECP) and Sediment Retention Devices (SRD)
Standard Practice for NTPEP Evaluation of Erosion Control Products (ECP) and Sediment Retention Devices (SRD) AASHTO Designation: ECP 14-01 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
More informationRecyclex TRM TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SPECIFICATION
Recyclex TRM TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SPECIFICATION PART I - GENERAL 1.01 Summary A. The Turf Reinforcement Mat (TRM) contains post-consumer recycled polyester fiber for the purpose of erosion control and
More informationCurlex Enforcer EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION
PART I - GENERAL Curlex Enforcer EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION 1.01 Summary A. The biocomposite Turf Reinforcement Mat (TRM) contains excelsior wood fiber for the purpose of erosion control and
More informationDevelopment of transition mat scour protection design methodology and comparison to the state-of-the-practice
Hydrology Days 2011 Development of transition mat scour protection design methodology and comparison to the state-of-the-practice Michael D. Turner, Amanda L. Cox 1, and Christopher I. Thornton Department
More informationTriNet Coconut EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION
PART I - GENERAL TriNet Coconut EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION 1.01 Summary A. The biocomposite Turf Reinforcement Mat (TRM) contains coconut fiber for the purpose of erosion control and revegetation
More informationTriNet Coconut EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION
PART I - GENERAL TriNet Coconut EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION 1.01 Summary A. The biocomposite Turf Reinforcement Mat (TRM) contains coconut fiber for the purpose of erosion control and revegetation
More informationStandards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES. Definition
STANDARD FOR SLOPE PROTECTION STRUCTURES Definition Structures to safely conduct surface runoff from the top of a slope to the bottom of the slope. Purpose The purpose of this practice is to convey storm
More informationStandards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS. Definition. Purpose
STANDARD FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS Definition A natural or constructed watercourse shaped or graded in earth materials and stabilized with suitable vegetation for the safe conveyance of runoff water. Purpose
More informationARMORMAX ENGINEERED EARTH ARMORING SOLUTIONS
ARMORMAX ENGINEERED EARTH ARMORING SOLUTIONS The ARMORMAX Engineered Earth Armoring Solution is the most advanced flexible armoring technology available for severe erosion and surficial slope stability
More informationMr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No
Environmental Resources Management January 13, 2017 Mr. Michael Malone 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 Project No. 0352436 CityCentre Four 840 West Sam Houston Parkway North, Suite 600 Houston,
More informationCurlex II EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION
Curlex II EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION PART I - GENERAL 1.01 Summary A. The erosion control blanket contains excelsior wood fiber for the purpose of erosion control and revegetation as described
More informationAEC Premier Straw Double Net Quick Mow EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION
AEC Premier Straw Double Net Quick Mow EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION PART I - GENERAL 1.01 Summary A. The erosion control blanket contains agricultural straw fibers for the purpose of erosion control
More informationFlow Diversion Banks: On earth slopes
Flow Diversion Banks: On earth slopes DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] [1]
More informationSECTION EROSION CONTROL MATTINGS AND COMPONENTS
SECTION 02375 EROSION CONTROL MATTINGS AND COMPONENTS PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. This section addresses erosion control blankets, erosion control revegetation matting, turf reinforcement matting, and
More informationCurlex High Velocity EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION
Curlex High Velocity EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPECIFICATION PART I - GENERAL 1.01 Summary A. The erosion control blanket contains excelsior wood fiber for the purpose of erosion control and revegetation
More informationWritten by: Lindsay O Leary Date: 11 /08 /26 Reviewed by: Brandon Klenzendorf Date: 11 /08 /26 YY MM DD YY MM DD
Page 2 of 21 Written by: Lindsay O Leary Date: 11 /08 /26 Reviewed by: Brandon Klenzendorf Date: 11 /08 /26 YY MM DD YY MM DD Client: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Project: ASARCO El Paso Site Project/Proposal
More informationFlexamat Tied Concrete Block Mats
Flexamat Tied Concrete Block Mats 1. DESCRIPTION 2. MATERIALS Flexamat Tied Concrete Block Erosion Control Mats This work shall consist of furnishing and placing the Flexamat system in accordance with
More informationDiversion Dikes. Fe=0.95
2.2 Diversion Dike Erosion Control Description: A diversion dike is a compacted soil mound, which redirects runoff to a desired location. The dike is typically stabilized with natural grass for low velocities
More information[1] Level spreaders can release sheet flow down steep slopes, but the level spreader itself must be constructed across a level gradient.
Level Spreaders DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient [1] Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] Level spreaders can release
More informationEvaluation of ALDOT Ditch Check Practices using Large-Scale Testing Techniques
Research Report No. 3 Project Number: 930-826R Evaluation of ALDOT Ditch Check Practices using Large-Scale Testing Techniques Large-scale Channel Testing (ASTM D 7208 modified) of Evaluation of Sand Bag
More informationTesting, Analyses, and Performance Values for Slope Interruption and Perimeter Control BMPs
Testing, Analyses, and Performance Values for Slope Interruption and Perimeter Control BMPs Kurt Kelsey Research Scientist American Excelsior Company 831 Pioneer Ave Rice Lake, WI 54868 Phone: 715-236-5643
More information521D-1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD POND SEALING OR LINING COMPACTED CLAY TREATMENT (NO.) CODE 521D DEFINITION A liner for a pond or waste storage impoundment constructed
More informationTreatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation
Stormwater Engineering Bioretention Design Bill Hunt, PE, Ph.D. Extension Specialist & Assistant Professor NCSU-BAE www.bae.ncsu.edu/stormwater Bioretention Design Six Step Process 1 Determine Volume to
More informationIndex. outlet protection Rev. 12/93
6 Index outlet protection level spreader outlet stabilization structure 6.40.1 6.41.1 Rev. 12/93 Practice Standards and Specifications 6.40 level spreader Definition Purpose Conditions Where Practice Applies
More informationPERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SOLUTIONS
PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SOLUTIONS Erosion Prevention and Protection Flexamat Provides Permanent Erosion Control Solutions for a Wide Range of Applications Including: AIRPORTS DOT ROADSIDE DRIVABLE SURFACES
More informationHYDRAULIC TESTING AND DATA REPORT FOR SIX- INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS
HYDRAULIC TESTING AND DATA REPORT FOR SIX- INCH TRITON FILTER MATTRESS Prepared for Tensar International Corporation Colorado State University Daryl B. Simons Building at the Engineering Research Center
More informationPOND SEALING OR LINING COMPACTED SOIL TREATMENT
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD POND SEALING OR LINING COMPACTED SOIL TREATMENT CODE 520 (FT. 2 ) DEFINITION A liner for an impoundment constructed using compacted
More informationPOST CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (d) Pond 1. Clinch Power Plant Russell County, West Virginia. November Prepared for: Appalachian Power Company
POST CLOSURE PLAN CFR 257.104(d) Pond 1 Clinch Power Plant Russell County, West Virginia November 2016 Prepared for: Appalachian Power Company Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure,
More informationSECTION EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS
SECTION 312500 PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Attention is directed to the CONTRACT AND GENERAL CONDITIONS and all Sections within DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS which are hereby made
More informationRETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE
-7 Given: Total Tributary Area = 7.5 ac o Tributary Area within Existing R/W = 5.8 ac o Tributary Area, Impervious, Outside of R/W = 0.0 ac o Tributary Area, Pervious, Outside of R/W = 1.7 ac o Tributary
More informationSediment Retention Fiber Roll (SRFR) General Usage and Installation Guidelines
April 2011 Version 1.0 Sediment Retention Fiber Roll (SRFR) General Usage and Installation Guidelines Erosion Control Technology Council Introduction Table of Contents Introduction 1 Reducing Slope Length
More informationMATERIAL SPECIFICATION Manufactured Ditch Checks
MATERIAL SPECIFICATION 514. Manufactured Ditch Checks 1. SCOPE This specification covers the types of material used in various manufactured ditch check products and associated installation materials. 2.
More informationEvaluation of ALDOT Ditch Check Practices using Large Scale Testing Techniques
Research Report No. 2 Project Number: 930 826R Evaluation of ALDOT Ditch Check Practices using Large Scale Testing Techniques Large scale Channel Testing (ASTM D 7208 modified) of Evaluation of ALDOT Class
More informationFlexamat Erosion Control Mat
Flexamat Erosion Control Mat 1. DESCRIPTION 2. MATERIALS Furnish and install Flexamat Erosion Control Mats. Submit manufacturer s performance research results and calculations in support of the Flexamat
More informationNTPEP Evaluation of Spray Applied Non-Structural and Structural Pipe Liners for Storm Water Conveyance
Work Plan for NTPEP Evaluation of Spray Applied Non-Structural and Structural Pipe Liners for Storm Water Conveyance AASHTO Designation: [SAL] (2018) American Association of State Highway and Transportation
More informationDecember 6, Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229
December 6, 2016 Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 RE: Drainage Conformance Letter Hilton Garden Inn @ The Grove The Grove Filing No 1, lot 5E Thornton,
More informationAwareness Training. Overview of Proposed Changes. John Showler, P.E. NJDA-SSCC
Awareness Training Overview of Proposed Changes John Showler, P.E. NJDA-SSCC December 12, 2012 Revised review process in the Governor s office added to timeline (was not present in 1999) Several revised
More informationWarner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual
Warner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual Prepared for Houston County City of Warner Robins City of Perry City of Centerville May 17, 2005 Version 4 (As presented with adopted Stormwater Ordinance)
More informationAPPENDIX I: EROSION TEST RESULTS ON NEW ORLEANS LEVEE SAMPLES
APPENDIX I: EROSION TEST RESULTS ON NEW ORLEANS LEVEE SAMPLES I.1 THE EFA: EROSION FUNCTION APPARATUS The EFA (Briaud et al. 1999, Briaud et al., 2001a) was conceived by Dr. Briaud in 1991, designed in
More informationCase History: Value Engineering of Driven H-Piles for Slope Stability on the Missouri River
DEEP FOUNDATIONS 207 Case History: Value Engineering of Driven H-Piles for Slope Stability on the Missouri River W. Robert Thompson, III, 1 M.ASCE, P.E., Jeffrey R. Hill, 2 M.ASCE, P.E., and J. Erik Loehr,
More informationINTERLOCK BETWEEN PARTICLES AT EACH PERFORATION
for Storm Water Management RUN OFF CONTROLS Porous Parking & Vehicle Access Cellular Confinement Systems (CCS) A Cellular Confinement System (CCS) is an engineered, expandable, polyethylene, honeycomb-like
More informationMVP 17.3 WATER BAR END TREATMENT SIZING AND DETAILS 1/22/18
MVP 17.3 WATER BAR END TREATMENT SIZING AND DETAILS 1/22/18 The purpose of this detail is to document the methodology developed to size the length of the water bar end treatments to ensure flow leaving
More informationCCR Annual Inspection (b) for the Ash Pond at the A.B. Brown Generating Station. Revision 0
Submitted to Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Company dba Vectren Power Supply, Inc. (SIGECO) One Vectren Square Evansville, IN 47708 Submitted by AECOM 9400 Amberglen Boulevard Austin, Texas 78729 257.83
More informationP R E M I E R M A N U F A C T U R E R O F E R O S I O N C O N T R O L P R O D U C T S
P R E M I E R M A N U F A C T U R E R O F E R O S I O N C O N T R O L P R O D U C T S T E M P O R A R Y E X T E N D E D P E R M A N E N T S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L BLANKETING NATURE WITH NATURE Blanketing
More informationJanuary 20, Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303)
January 20, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter
More informationCatch Drains Part 4: Geotextile-lined
Catch Drains Part 4: Geotextile-lined DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] [1]
More informationSediment Basin. Fe= (Depends on soil type)
3.9 Sediment Control Description: A sediment basin is an embankment with a controlled outlet that detains stormwater runoff, resulting in the settling of suspended sediment. The basin provides treatment
More informationSE-6 GRAVEL BAG BERM. Objectives. Potential Alternatives
Objectives Erosion Control - EC Sediment Control - SE Tracking Control - TC Wind Erosion Control - WE Non-Storm Water Management - NS Materials and Waste Management - WM DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE A gravel
More informationSlope Erosion Testing Identifying Critical Parameters
Slope Erosion Testing Identifying Critical Parameters C. Joel Sprague, P.E. TRI/Environmental, Inc. PO Box 9192, Greenville, SC 29604 Phone: 864/242-2220, Fax: 864/242-3107; cjoelsprague@cs.com Presented
More informationCOMPACTED CLAY LINERS
Technical Reference Document for Liquid Manure Storage Structures COMPACTED CLAY LINERS Table of Contents SECTION 1 - PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1.1. Purpose of the Technical Reference Document 1.2. Requirement
More informationErosion Control Blankets
2.3 Erosion Control Description: An erosion control blanket (ECB) is a temporary, degradable, rolled erosion control product that reduces soil erosion and assists in the establishment and growth of vegetation.
More informationATTACHMENT 6 WATER QUALITY SWALE DESIGN ADDENDUM
ATTACHMENT 6 WATER QUALITY SWALE DESIGN ADDENDUM 12 October 2010 Project No. 073-81694.0022 Mr. Robert R. Monok Project Manager Energy Fuels Resource Corporation 44 Union Boulevard, Suite 600 Lakewood,
More informationRE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016
April 12, 2016 Mr. Craig Perl, P.E. Senior Engineer City of Aurora Public Works Department 15151 E. Alameda Parkway Aurora, CO 80012 RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016
More informationDr. Mark Risse Dr. Sidney Thompson Xianben Zhu Keith Harris Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Evaluation of Belted Strand Retention Fabric and Conventional Type C Silt Fence using ASTM standards Dr. Mark Risse Dr. Sidney Thompson Xianben Zhu Keith Harris Department of Biological and Agricultural
More informationRational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT
Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel Harlan H. Bengtson, PhD, P.E. COURSE CONTENT 1. Introduction Calculation of peak storm water runoff rate from a drainage area is often done with the
More informationAugust 15, 2006 (Revised) July 3, 2006 Project No A
August 15, 2006 (Revised) July 3, 2006 Project No. 01-05-0854-101A Mr. David Reed, P.E. Protean Design Group 100 East Pine Street, Suite 306 Orlando, Florida 32801 Preliminary Soil Survey Report Polk Parkway
More informationAlternative BMPs for Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control
Alternative BMPs for Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control J.P. Johns, PE - Woolpert March 11, 2011 Agenda + Traditional BMPs + Performance Specifications + Erosion Prevention + Sediment Control + The
More informationB. Install storm drain inlet protection to prevent clogging of the stormsewer and sediment loads to downstream stormwater facilities or waterbodies.
The language provided in these specifications is meant to serve as a reminder and provide a generic example of the type of language that should be provided in final construction documents. This language
More informationDetermination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities
Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities 1 Introduction This document, developed by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
More informationStormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia
Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia Adopted November 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 2 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 2 2.1.1.
More informationCurlex Blocs Natural Filters for Challenging Conditions
Curlex Blocs Natural Filters for Challenging Conditions August 2013 By: American Excelsior Company ErosionLab Kurt Kelsey, M.S., CPESC, CPSWQ Director of Technical Services 831 Pioneer Ave Rice Lake, WI
More informationLow Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]
Diversion Channels DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] [1] The design of permanent
More informationMODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville
MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual City of Centerville Adopted December 6, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 1 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 1 2.1.1. Discharge
More informationFACING OPTIONS FOR REINFORCED STEEPED SLOPES
FACING OPTIONS FOR REINFORCED STEEPED SLOPES Prepared by: TenCate TM Geosynthetics North America 365 South Holland Drive Pendergrass, GA 30567 Tel 706 693 2226 Fax 706 693 4400 www.tencate.com Revised:
More information( ) or 811 or mo1call.com
Missouri One Call 1-800-DIG RITE (800-344-7483) or 811 or mo1call.com Missouri One Call 1-800-DIG RITE (800-344-7483) or 811 or mo1call.com Missouri One Call 1-800-DIG RITE (800-344-7483) or 811 or mo1call.com
More informationSTORM WATER REPORT. Proposed Row House Complex Clare and Hilson 566 Hilson Ave. & 148 Clare St. Ottawa, Ontario PREPARED FOR:
Civil Geotechnical Structural Environmental 210 Prescott Street, Unit 1 (613) 860-0923 P.O. Box 189 Kemptville, Ontario K0G 1J0 FAX: (613) 258-0475 STORM WATER REPORT Proposed Row House Complex Clare and
More informationDrop-In Specification Standard Flexamat Erosion Control System (English Units)
Drop-In Specification Standard Flexamat Erosion Control System (English Units) The following specification is a sample guideline to be customized by the engineer as needed for preparing a site-specific
More informationSECTION MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTHEN SLOPES. Display hidden notes to specifier by using Tools / Options / View / Hidden Text.
PART 1 GENERAL SECTION 02260 MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTHEN SLOPES Display hidden notes to specifier by using Tools / Options / View / Hidden Text. 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. ** NOTE TO SPECIFIER ** Delete
More informationMaine s Land Use Regulations and Erosion Control Techniques
Maine s Land Use Regulations and Erosion Control Techniques Protecting Maine s Air, Land and Water Colin Clark 441-7419 colin.a.clark@maine.gov Tom Gilbert 441-8031 thomas.gilbert@maine.gov Jim Rodrigue
More informationHUITEX GEOCELL INSTALLATION MANUAL
Table of Contents 1 Site Preparation 2 Installation for the Retaining Wall 2.1 Base Preparation 2.2 Footing Installation 2.3 Placement of the Drainage System 2.4 Placement of the HUITEX Geocell panels
More informationErosion Control Solutions. By: Cathy Wall, Frank Lauro, Marc Theisen Quality Seeds Ltd., Profile Products LLC
Erosion Control Solutions By: Cathy Wall, Frank Lauro, Marc Theisen Quality Seeds Ltd., Profile Products LLC Introduction Evolution of Erosion Control Technologies Goals Material Categories Performance
More informationErosion Control Product Testing
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Reports Utah Water Research Laboratory January 1979 Erosion Control Product Testing C. Earl Israelsen Eugene K. Israelsen Joel E. Fletcher Jerald S. Fifield Ronald
More informationFlow Diversion Banks: On grassed slopes
Flow Diversion Banks: On grassed slopes DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] [1]
More informationGRADING, FILL, EXCAVATION AND LANDSCAPING 2012 EDITION
CHAPTER 23.105 GRADING, FILL, EXCAVATION AND LANDSCAPING 2012 EDITION Sections 23.105.101 General... 1 23.105.102 Definitions... 1 23.105.103 Permits required... 3 23.105.104 Hazards.... 4 23.105.105 Permit
More informationMarch 28, Port of Kalama Mr. Jacobo Salan 380 West Marine Drive Kalama, Washington 98625
11917 NE 95 th Street, Vancouver, Washington 98682 Phone: 360-823-2900, Fax: 360-823-2901 March 28, 2014 Port of Kalama Mr. Jacobo Salan 380 West Marine Drive Kalama, Washington 98625 Re: Construction
More informationROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval. SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07. Exemptions EMBANKMENT HEIGHT. Height of Dam Weir Wall
SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07 Ken Wolfe Warren Johnson USDA, NRCS Frederick, Maryland ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval MDE, WMA, Dam Safety Division Authority (COMAR 26.17.04.03)
More informationLyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual
Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual Prepared by: Mike Shaw Stormwater Program Manager City of Mountlake Terrace January 2010 Section I General Information This
More informationmtec REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION FTFA Construct Bin Wall at HERD Eglin AFB, Florida
mtec REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION FTFA 14-3001 - Construct Bin Wall at HERD Eglin AFB, Florida MTEC Project Number 2014-101 November 10, 2014 Revised: January 5, 2015 Prepared For: Peterson Engineering,
More informationSOIL MECHANICS Assignment #2: Soil Classification Solution.
Geotechnical Engineering Research Laboratory One University Avenue Lowell, Massachusetts 01854 Edward L. Hajduk, D.Eng, PE Lecturer PA105D Tel: (978) 934 2621 Fax: (978) 934 3052 e mail: Edward_Hajduk@uml.edu
More informationPrecipitation Surface Cover Topography Soil Properties
Precipitation Surface Cover Topography Soil Properties Intrinsic capacity of rainfall to cause erosion Influenced by Amount, intensity, terminal velocity, drop size and drop size distribution of rain.
More informationApril 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT David A. Jones, P.E., Director April 7, 2017 Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No. 2017-022 Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1 Please make the following changes
More informationGeosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs) Advances in GCLs. Bruno Herlin, P.Eng. Bentofix Product Manager
Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs) Advances in GCLs Bruno Herlin, P.Eng. Bentofix Product Manager bherlin@terrafixgeo.com Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs) Advances in GCLs Bruno Herlin, P.Eng. Bentofix Product
More informationNovember 21, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report
November 21, 2016 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7295 RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report As per your request, we are submitting to you the drainage report
More informationSECTION EROSION CONTROLS
SECTION 31 25 13 EROSION CONTROLS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Section Includes installing, maintaining and removing: 1. Silt Fence. 2. Temporary Construction Entrances. 3. Diversion Channels. 4. Sediment
More informationWQ-08 ENHANCED DRY SWALE
Greenville County Technical Specification for: WQ-08 ENHANCED DRY SWALE 1.0 Enhanced Dry Swale 1.1 Description An Enhanced Dry Swale is a shallow open-channel drainage way stabilized with turf grass or
More information