PROJECT CHARTER South Coast 101 HOV Lanes Project Design Decision Phase
|
|
- Corey George
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PROJECT CHARTER South Coast 101 HOV Lanes Project Design Decision Phase PRIMARY PROJECT SPONSOR Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) Date Prepared 03 April 2015 PROJECT PARTNERS Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) State of California Department of Transportation District 5 (CALTRANS) CHARTER PURPOSE The Project Charter establishes a mutual understanding and agreement between SBCAG, and Caltrans regarding the development of the design decision phase of the South Coast 101 HOV Lanes project. SBCAG and Caltrans agree that managing the projects and programs on the US 101 Corridor over the next several years requires a unique and separate operating model and partnership. In addition to the South Coast 101 HOV Lanes project, several independent projects and programs may be implemented in parallel all moving toward the goal of improving mobility on US 101. With so many projects and programs being implemented a partnership between Caltrans and SBCAG that helps ensure success, pro-active coordination, and aligned public outreach is required. The charter will provide guidance through the completion of the design decision phase for the South Coast 101 HOV Lanes Project. The charter will also serve as the guiding principles for future phases of work including final design and construction. The charter may be amended at a later date to address any changes in future phases. The charter provides a framework to establish the working relationship between Caltrans and SBCAG (and its consultants), which is paramount to the successful completion of improvements within the corridor. Furthermore, this charter begins to establish how SBCAG and Caltrans will coordinate work related to project deliverables, quality control and quality assurance, and independent quality assurance responsibilities. This specifically relates to the submittal of documents, review and approval of these documents and conflict resolution. The charter, which is a non-binding agreement, does not take the place of specific cooperative agreements for individual phases of the project that will be required. A cooperative agreement has a similar focus, as a charter except it is a formal contractual agreement that defines specific terms and clauses for the work to be completed. PROJECT BACKGROUND South Coast 101 HOV Lanes Project US 101 is one of two north-south highways that connect the Los Angeles basin, with a population of 13 million, and the greater San Francisco Bay Area, with a population of 6.7 million. On a daily basis, including weekends, commuters from neighboring Ventura County, interregional traffic, and tourists from around the world contribute to the facility s average daily traffic of 90,000 vehicles a day, exceeding the capacity of the 12 mile, four-lane bottleneck in south Santa Barbara County for hours at a time, bringing the corridor to a crawl. The congestion impacts the economic vitality of the Santa Barbara urbanized area, a vibrant employment center including businesses and industries that benefit from close proximity to Vandenberg Air Force Base near Lompoc, the University of California at Santa Barbara near Goleta, the blossoming and vibrant agricultural industry and hundreds of businesses related to the tourism industry. When Interstate 5 is closed due to accidents, fires, 1
2 snow, or other inclement weather, north-south traffic in California is diverted to the US 101. The US 101 is designated as a state Focus Route, a High Emphasis Route, a principal arterial on the National Highway System, Strategic Highway Network Route, a State Highway Extra Legal Load Route, and part of the National Truck Network. The South Coast 101 HOV Lanes Project is being designed to eliminate the four-lane bottleneck by widening the highway to six lanes, conforming to the cross sections north and south of Santa Barbara and Carpinteria, respectively. The two new lanes will be part-time (peak period), continuous access HOV lanes. Upon completion of the project, the corridor will be a part of a continuous 40-mile, 6-lane facility, extending from the Ventura/Oxnard urbanized area through Carpinteria and Santa Barbara, to the city of Goleta in southern Santa Barbara County. The widening of US 101 has its roots in the 2006 long-range planning study for congestion relief and improved mobility on US 101 called 101 in Motion. 101 in Motion also recommended the implementation a number of other strategies such as commuter rail, operational and incident management, transit projects and demand management programs. However, the US 101 widening strategy was identified as the major congestion relief strategy. Caltrans and SBCAG have identified a four-phase approach for highway widening improvements to be implemented on US 101. A four-phased approach to widening US 101 began with the Milpas to Hot Springs Operational Improvement Project, completed in The project widened US 101 from Milpas Street to the Hot Springs/Cabrillo interchange by adding a new northbound lane from the Cabrillo Boulevard on-ramp to the Milpas Street off-ramp and added a third southbound lane from Milpas Street to the Butterfly Lane Pedestrian undercrossing. Another opportunity to fund a segment of the add a lane portion of the 101 In Motion recommendation came as a result of Proposition 1B being passed by the California voters in Funding for key transportation corridors was approved, and Caltrans Districts 5 and 7, along with the SBCAG and the Ventura County Transportation Commission, joined efforts to seek funding for an HOV lane addition/facility widening project extending from Mussel Shoals (Ventura County) to Carpinteria Creek. Construction on this second phase of the US 101 widening is nearly complete. The third phase of US 101 widening will occur in Carpinteria with the Linden Avenue and Casitas Pass interchanges project, slated for construction in This project would improve operations on US 101 by reconstructing two interchanges Casitas Pass Road and Linden Avenue and replacing the US 101 bridges over Carpinteria Creek. Both of these improvements will provide sufficient width to accommodate a third lane on US 101 in each direction through the project area. The focus of this charter is the South Coast 101 HOV Lanes Project or what is called Phase 4. The limits of the South Coast 101 HOV Lanes Project extend from 0.22 mile south of Bailard Avenue (post mile 1.4) in the City of Carpinteria to Sycamore Creek (post mile 12.3) in the City of Santa Barbara. The project proposes to widen US 101 from four lanes to six lanes (three lanes in each direction) and combined with the first three project efforts, will result in 30 lane-miles of HOV lanes, both northbound and southbound on US 101 between Mussel Shoals in northern Ventura County to the City of Santa Barbara. The environmental document for Phase 4 has been completed as of August In December 2014, initial recommendations for proceeding with design were provided to the SBCAG board, which were subsequently approved in March
3 South Coast 101 Rehabilitation Project A separate Caltrans project is planned to rehabilitate the US 101 freeway in Santa Barbara County from the Casitas Pass Overcrossing (OC) in Carpinteria to 0.5 miles north of the Cabrillo Boulevard Undercrossing in the City of Santa Barbara. This proposed project is planned to be constructed concurrently with the South Coast 101 HOV Lanes Project to allow for more efficient traffic control and to minimize long-term construction needs in the corridor. This project proposes to replace the existing structural section of the freeway to correct the existing structural deficiencies. This project proposes to widen outside shoulders to 10 feet (standard for three lane sections), profile grade adjustments, replacing nonstandard guard railing, raising guard railing to standard height, improving ramp geometry, replacing ramp structural sections, upgrading curbs, dikes, gutters and drainage inlets. CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE The management structure proposed in the charter is based in the need to advance project implementation and proceed with 35% design related activities for the entire HOV Lanes project. The objective is to generate more detailed design in order to address stakeholders concerns, explore combining the HOV with the rehabilitation improvements, refine the cost estimate and generate additional information to evaluate alternative delivery methods. Furthermore, by advancing design, the overall project readiness for construction increases, which would enhance the ability to pursue potential opportunities to leverage additional funding. Following completion of this phase, SBCAG and Caltrans will assess the feasibility of advancing the entire project, or portions thereof, to final design and construction and make a final determination of whether alternative design strategies should be utilized. The organization chart below shows how Caltrans and SBCAG staff will cooperate to manage the projects and activities in the US 101 corridor during the initial design phase of the project. Recognizing that several disciplines and studies are common and most effectively and efficiently implemented across the entire corridor and not any one particular design segment, several tasks will be implemented across the entire corridor. The implementation of the organizational structure shown in Figure 1 will include the following: Establishment of a US 101 Executive Steering Committee comprised of SBCAG and Caltrans management, 101 Corridor Manger, and Deputy Corridor Manager that shall meet regularly to discuss projects and programs on-going in the corridor. The corridor manager, with assistance from the US 101 Corridor Advisor, shall be responsible for coordination of these meetings. SBCAG and Caltrans will each assign key individuals to serve in the capacity of the US 101 Executive Management Committee and corridor project organization as defined in Figure 1. SBCAG and Caltrans will coordinate and execute co-operative agreement(s) regarding funding opportunities to leverage existing funding and attract additional funding to ensure the timely completion of corridor improvements. SBCAG and Caltrans will develop and obtain the appropriate approval of a phasing strategy for implementation and/or alternate delivery method of the project that considers available funding, speed of delivery, HOV continuity, ability to leverage additional funding and congestion relief. SBCAG and Caltrans will enter into cooperative agreement to define roles and responsibilities for the design phase of the project 3
4 FIGURE 1 US 101 CORRIDOR PROJECT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Corridor Advisor (SBCAG Consultant) SBCAG Board of Directors US 101 Executive Steering Committee Corridor Manager (Caltrans) & Dep. Corridor Manager (SBCAG) SOUTHERN SEGMENT Project Manager (Caltrans) Mainline 101 Improvements between Carpinteria Crk and Padaro Ln PM 2.0 to PM % PS&E Corridor Task Services (Caltrans) Topographical Surveys and Base Mapping Geotechnical Design, Hazardous Waste Analysis, Pavement Design, Materials, and Preliminary Foundation Reports Corridor Aesthetics Concept Plan Corridor Task Services (SBCAG Consultant) Floodplain Analysis Utility, Railroad, and Right of Way Coordination Community Involvement / Local Agency Coordination / Graphics, 3D Modeling Coastal Permitting Coordination Project Management Support and Oversight Engineering Peer Review / Value Analysis NORTHERN SEGMENT Project Manager (SBCAG Consultant) Reconstruct Interchanges at Cabrillo-Hot Springs and Sheffield and Mainline 101 Improvements between Padaro Ln and Cabrillo Blvd. PM 7.5 to PM % PS&E PROJECT DESIGN SEGMENTS AND PHASING 4
5 SBCAG and Caltrans have agreed that the project be divided into the following two segments for advancing the design to 35% at this time: Southern Segment (PM 2.0- PM 7.5) This segment begins within the City of Carpinteria and extends through the Toro Canyon community of Santa Barbara County, to just north of the Padaro Lane interchange; Northern Segment (PM 7.5- PM 11.9) This segment begins at the southern end of the Summerland community of Santa Barbara County, just north of the Padaro Lane interchange and extends through the Montecito community ending in the City of Santa Barbara, just north of the Cabrillo Blvd interchange. Caltrans District 5 would design the southern segment and an SBCAG selected consultant would design the northern segment. Caltrans would provide independent quality assurance for SBCAG s segment which includes the review and approval of products prepared by SBCAG s consultant. CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT In order to effectuate the US 101 Corridor working relationship and organization structure, SBCAG, and Caltrans agree to the following: Executive Committee and Management 1. A US 101 Executive Committee (EC) shall be established to act as the steering committee for Caltrans and SBCAG project delivery teams. The EC will include the following representatives from Caltrans District 5: the District Director, the Deputy Director for Program and Project Management, and the Corridor Manager. The EC will include the following representatives from SBCAG: the Executive Director, the Deputy Corridor Manager, the Corridor Advisor, the Deputy Director for Programming and Project Development, and the Government Affairs Coordinator/Public Information Officer. The EC shall meet as needed but not more infrequently than quarterly. The EC will be charged with providing strategic direction on key issues to the individual project delivery teams, and guide overall funding coordination at the regional, interregional, state and federal levels. 2. The agencies agree to designate a Corridor Manager (CM) and Deputy Corridor Manager (DCM) staffed by Caltrans and SBCAG, respectively. The role of the CM/DCM is to coordinate the work of the consultant and Caltrans design teams working towards 35% design and with the environmental team preparing the Project Approval/Environmental document for the rehabilitation project, coordinate the HOV Lanes project with other projects being developed in the corridor, coordinate internally at Caltrans the oversight of the work being done by the design teams, coordinate input from local agencies, maintain a corridor master schedule, coordinate the programming and allocation of funding for the project, eliminate red tape impediments to progress, ensure that similar project development issues that arise with each team are treated similarly and predictably, and allocate on-call corridor support resources as needed to each team. The CM/DCM are also responsible for keeping the US 101 Executive Team and SBCAG board informed of the progress of the project. 3. Caltrans Corridor Manager and SBCAG s Deputy Corridor Manager shall work closely together as the primary point of contact for establishing consistency in the application of strategy, policy, and design requirements. They shall also work together and with their own individual management teams and the Corridor Advisor to establish the agendas for the regular meetings of the US 101 Management Executive Committee and to provide regular updates to the SBCAG Board of Directors. 35% Design Phase 5
6 1. The South Coast 101 HOV Lanes project will be implemented through the design phase in two design segments: Northern segment and Southern segment. Each of the design segments will require the development of a Project Development Team (PDT). 2. Caltrans shall assign a design team to develop the Southern Segment. The Design team shall be committed to working on this project for the entirety of this phase. 3. Caltrans shall assign an environmental team to develop the environmental documentation for the South Coast 101 Rehabilitation project, both the Northern and Southern segments. Caltrans shall prepare the project report for the Southern Segment. 4. SBCAG shall conduct a consultant selection process by which a design team will be selected to develop the Northern Segment. This consultant team shall also be responsible for preparing the Project Report for the South Coast 101 Rehabilitation project for the Northern Segment. SBCAG shall include representatives from Caltrans and the local agency(s) in the area on the selection panel. 5. SBCAG shall also conduct consultant selection process (es) by which firm(s) will be selected to perform corridor task services as identified in Figure 1. The Deputy Corridor Manager from SBCAG will be responsible for the allocation of these services. 6. Caltrans shall also be responsible for completing corridor task services as identified in Figure 1. The Caltrans Corridor Manager will be responsible for the delivery of these services. 7. Caltrans shall establish a PDT for the Southern Segment. The full PDT will consist of, at minimum, applicable Caltrans functional unit managers, appropriate corridor task services consultants, and local agency staff representatives related to the particular design segment being developed. The PDT is responsible for addressing issues at the lowest possible level and briefing their respective management in a timely manner. Also, the PDT is responsible for developing recommendations for decisions that require management or regulatory agency action. 8. SBCAG shall establish a PDT for the Northern Segment. The full PDT will consist of, at minimum, design consultant technical representatives, Caltrans environmental team and oversight technical representatives, and local agency staff representatives related to the design segment being developed. The PDT is responsible for addressing issues at the lowest possible level and briefing their respective management in a timely manner. Also, the PDT is responsible for developing recommendations for decisions that require management or regulatory agency action. 9. For the purposes of effectuating deliverables, exchanging information, and monitoring progress, a corridor working group shall be established consisting of the Corridor Manager, Deputy Corridor Manager, the Southern and Northern Segment Project Managers, and the Southern and Northern Segment Project Engineers. Any project scope or PDT membership changes for the Northern or Southern segments would need to be considered by the corridor working group. This group is expected to meet tri-annually, or as needed. 10. Caltrans shall act in an oversight role for any design segments led by SBCAG. Caltrans shall provide independent quality assurance as part of their review process. 11. SBCAG s design team shall prepare design deliverables for review by Caltrans oversight representative(s). SBCAG shall be responsible for providing quality assurance and quality control for its submitted deliverables. 12. Caltrans and SBCAG will prepare a work plan to include the scope of work, schedule and estimated cost for their respective design segments. 13. As the design decision phase work products near completion, Caltrans and SBCAG will conduct an evaluation process to develop a recommended phasing and / or alternative delivery method for completing final design, right of way, and construction in the corridor. The evaluation will consider updated design decision phase work products including, but not limited to, project costs, traffic staging, and FEMA coordination needs. Other factors will also be taken into account, including but not limited 6
7 to, funding, coastal development permitting, HOV system continuity, traffic congestion relief, and adjacent projects funding and timing. Final Design, Right of Way and Construction Phases Upon selection of a preferred phasing strategy for completing final design, right of way, and construction, new charter(s) will be developed for the remaining phases of the project. DELIVERABLE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULE Management of the design phase deliverables will be conducted through the individual PDT s. Project progress shall be reported at regularly scheduled progress / coordination and US 101 Executive Committee meetings. Each PDT shall ascribe to the following goals in managing project progress: Meeting notes and correspondence serve as an important basis of documentation for project-related decisions. The project manager for each design segment will develop a delivery schedule and obtain the PDT s concurrence. ISSUE RESOLUTION It is the intent of Caltrans and SBCAG to resolve issues at the lowest level possible. However, certain issues may need to be elevated when consensus cannot be obtained. First level of review and resolution: many of the issues that arise during the development of a project can be resolved by the PDT, especially those that do not impact the scope, cost or schedule of the project. The PDT will review the project issue, the options for resolution, the pros and cons to each option, and any advocate s reasons in support of specific option. Provided the resolution does not change the scope, cost and schedule of the project, the PDT should determine the outcome. If the PDT either does not have sufficient authority to resolve the issue or is unable to agree, then the project manager will elevate the issue within six (6) working days following the meeting that identified and attempted to attain resolution. Second level of review and resolution: the second level involves the Caltrans Corridor Manager and the SBCAG Deputy Corridor Manager. They will review the document presenting the issue, the options for resolution, the pros and cons to each option, and any advocate s reasons in support of specific options. Provided the resolution falls within their responsibility and available contingencies, which they oversee, they should determine the outcome. If they either do not have sufficient authority to resolve the issue or are unable to agree, then they will elevate the issue to the third level of review after two discussions/meetings; an initial meeting to hear the issue, and, if necessary, a second meeting to hear any additional information requested during the first meeting. Third level review and resolution: the third level of review involves the District 5 Director and the SBCAG Executive Director. They will review the document presenting the issue, the options for resolution, the pros and cons to each option, and the advocate s reasons in support of specific options. Provided the resolution falls within the authority granted to them, then they should determine the outcome. If, for some reason, the issue cannot be fully resolved without approval from the SBCAG board of directors and/or Caltrans Headquarters, they will direct the preparation of agenda items for any required action needed to ratify their agreed upon solution. Caltrans expressly reserves the right to exercise its authority to direct the implementation of the appropriate responses to issues affecting the project in the event that Caltrans believes that the implementation of a project proposal may adversely affect: The safety of the traveling public or State or SBCAG employees; 7
8 Future Caltrans liability in respect to the operation and maintenance of the completed project facility; Future operations and maintenance costs of the constructed project facilities; and Future statutory obligations of Caltrans that may arise during the development of the project and pertain to either the new or existing facility but are not yet identifiable at this time. Should Caltrans exercise this authority, it will do so by advising SBCAG s Executive Director and Chair, 15 days prior to issuing a determination and by issuing the determination in a letter signed by the Caltrans District 5 Director. KEY PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS Corridor Manager / Caltrans Deputy Corridor Manager / SBCAG SBCAG Executive Director SBCAG Deputy Director SBCAG Project Manager for North Segment SBCAG Public Information Officer Caltrans District Director Caltrans Deputy Director for Program Project Management Caltrans Project Manager for South Segment APPROVALS Caltrans SBCAG Timothy M. Gubbins, District Director Jim Kemp, Executive Director 8
US-101 CORRIDOR ADVISOR S UPDATE 19 MARCH 2015
US-101 CORRIDOR ADVISOR S UPDATE 19 MARCH 2015 1 DELIVERY RECOMMENDATION GOALS Project Readiness: Enhance Funding pursuits Corridor Related Projects Coordination Develop Information to: Resolve Questions
More informationUS-101 CORRIDOR ADVISOR S UPDATE
US-101 CORRIDOR ADVISOR S UPDATE MONTECITO ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS 12 MAY 2015 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES Identify & evaluate innovative project delivery strategies: Avoid & minimize delays / expedite
More informationDebra Larson and Director Malcolm Dougherty
Caltrans District 5 District Director Timothy Gubbins Looking south at US 101/San Juan Road interchange in Monterey County Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to
More informationRichard Clarke Executive Director Program Management. Capital Program Management
Richard Clarke Executive Director Program Management Capital Program Management Department Overview > Transit, Highway Programs, and Regional Rail o Transit Deliver construction projects on-time and within
More informationNorth County Subregional Planning Committee
North County Subregional Planning Committee Wednesday, April 06, 2011 9:00 am 10:30 AM Buellton Recreation Center, Room A 301 Second Street, Buellton, CA Members Present: Chair, Joni Gray Supervisor Fourth
More informationTHE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.
THE PROJECT A freeway segment ranked 6th worst in the Nation, with levels of congestion, pollution and accidents that are simply unacceptable and which have Statewide and National implications. Executive
More informationPresented to : I 710 Project Committee June 30, 2011
Presented to : I 710 Project Committee June 30, 2011 Overview Metro s Public Private Partnership (PPP) program Traffic Effects of Tolling Trucks on I 710 Statutory Authority for Tolling Interstate Highways
More informationMembers of the Board of Directors. Laurena Weinert, Clerk of the Board
COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL July, 06 To: From: Subject: Members of the Board of Directors Laurena Weinert, Clerk of the Board Update on the State Route Improvement Project Between Interstate 0 and Interstate
More informationSTAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: June 19, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: 6A
STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: AMTRAK Pacific Surfliner Service MEETING DATE: June 19, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: 6A RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize the chair to sign a letter supporting release of State Proposition 1B bond
More informationFOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310
INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT FOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310 PREPARED BY: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STAUNTON DISTRICT DECEMBER 13, 2006
More informationELEMENT M GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Growth Management ELEMENT M GROWTH MANAGEMENT GOAL: To ensure that growth and development are integrally planned with, and phased concurrently with, the City of Irvine s ability to provide an adequate
More informationChapter 4: Transportation and Circulation
Chapter 4: Transportation and Circulation 4.1 Introduction Circulation improvements constructed for the West Valley Logistics Center will improve the functional efficiency of the circulation system in
More information5/11/2016 SR 15 SECTION 088 CSVT SOUTHERN SECTION SR 15 SECTION 088 CSVT SOUTHERN SECTION AGENDA
PUBLIC OFFICIALS MEETING MAY 11, 2016 AGENDA I. INTRODUCTIONS V. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS VI. PROJECT SCHEDULE VII. UPCOMING ACTIVITIES VOPEN DISCUSSION & QUESTIONS IX. ACTION ITEMS 1 A. Bridge Lighting
More informationProject Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018
Project Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects 2018 TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018 Challenge Limited funding for transportation improvements requires strategic selection of projects to ensure resource
More informationPROJECT STUDY REPORT. Cal Poly Pomona Senior Project
06/2014 PROJECT STUDY REPORT (Cal Poly Pomona Senior Project) For Conceptual Approval of an Interchange Improvement And Cooperative Agreement with The City of Lake Elsinore for completion of Project Approval
More informationReduce Congestion and Repair Central Tri-State Tollway (I-294) April 27, 2017
Reduce Congestion and Repair Central Tri-State Tollway (I-294) April 27, 2017 Tri-State Tollway (I-294) Corridor Overview Workhorse of Tollway system Annual Daily Traffic Integral to state and region s
More informationFEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION AUGUST 2015 Table of Contents 1 Decision... 1 1.1 Project Description... 2 1.2 Basis for the FHWA Decision... 7 1.2.1
More informationNORTH I-75 MASTER PLAN Summary Report
NORTH I-75 MASTER PLAN Summary Report Interstate 75 (SR 93) From the Florida s Turnpike Interchange to the I-10 Interchange Alachua, Bradford, Clay, Citrus, Columbia, Duval, Levy, Marion, and Sumter Counties,
More informationComparison of I-210 and I-710 as Potential ICM Corridors
Comparison of I-210 and I-710 as Potential ICM Corridors Positive Aspects Traffic sensors Very good PeMS coverage of freeway mainline, HOV lanes, and ramps Many intersections within Pasadena already equipped
More informationExit 73 I-29 Interchange Modification Justification Study
xit 73 I-29 Interchange Modification Justification tudy Introduction Figure 1 shows the location of xit 73. This interchange is proposed to be the connecting point of the ast and West Corridors to I-29.
More informationI 75 PD&E STUDIES TABLE OF CONTENTS DTTM, TECHNICAL REPORT No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS DTTM, TECHNICAL REPORT No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. SECTION TITLE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -------------------------------------------------------------------- ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More informationRequest for Proposals. Hillsdale Pedestrian/Bicyclist Bridge Design
Request for Proposals Hillsdale Pedestrian/Bicyclist Bridge Design Public Works Department City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 JUNE 13, 2013 The City of San Mateo (CITY) is accepting
More informationSBCAG is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) of the nine county jurisdictions, which provides a forum for solving regional problems
SBCAG is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) of the nine county jurisdictions, which provides a forum for solving regional problems The SBCAG region is coextensive with the County of Santa Barbara SBCAG fulfills
More informationAppendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY 2014 REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2014 RTP/SCS APPENDIX O SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
More informationCLA /10.54, PID Project Description:
Project Description: The proposed project will consist of widening IR 70 to three lanes from Enon Road (SLM 06.75) to the US 68 interchange ramps (SLM 10.55). IR 70 is a component of the Strategic Highway
More informationSouth Bay Measure R Highway Program (SBHP) Strategic Transportation Element. Planning & Programming Committee Meeting
South Bay Measure R Highway Program (SBHP) Strategic Transportation Element Planning & Programming Committee Meeting July 17, 2013 Strategic Transportation Element (STE) What is STE? STE is to provide
More informationSummary. Preliminary Alternative Development and Screening. DEIS July 23, 2018
What is the Carolina Crossroads Project? The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is proposing to upgrade and redesign a key
More informationCONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. 10/20/2016 Draft
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 10/20/2016 Draft [BLANK PAGE] 2016 SBCAG BOARD MEMBERSHIP ROSTER SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DISTRICT THIRD DISTRICT FOURTH DISTRICT FIFTH DISTRICT Member
More informationSANTA BARBARA COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM APPROVED JUNE 18, 2009
2009 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM APPROVED JUNE 18, 2009 SUPERVISORS Member Supervisorial District SALUD CARBAJAL (Vice-Chair) JANET WOLF DOREEN FARR JONI GRAY JOE CENTENO FIRST
More informationI-64 Peninsula Shoulder Usage Evaluation. Eric Stringfield VDOT Hampton Roads Transportation Planning April 3, 2013
I-64 Peninsula Shoulder Usage Evaluation Eric Stringfield VDOT Hampton Roads Transportation Planning April 3, 2013 Briefing Purpose Evaluation Area / Existing Conditions Code and Policy Engineering Facts
More informationSouth County Traffic Relief Effort (SCTRE) Draft Project Study Report (PSR)-Project Development Support (PDS)
July 25, 2018 Mr. David Speirs Project Manager Corridor Management Group Transportation Corridor Agencies 125 Pacifica, Suite 120 Irvine, CA 92618 RE: South County Traffic Relief Effort (SCTRE) Draft Project
More informationEXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION REPORT (IJR) FOR INTERSTATE 75 AT OVERPASS ROAD
Scope of Services 12/08/2008 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION REPORT (IJR) FOR INTERSTATE 75 AT OVERPASS ROAD TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pace I. 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................,............................................................
More informationPREPARED TESTIMONY OF LEE LISECKI. Q. Please state your name, professional position, and business address.
Application 06-12-005 et al. Exhibit Date: August, 2008 PREPARED TESTIMONY OF LEE LISECKI Q. Please state your name, professional position, and business address. A. My name is Lee Lisecki. I am a principal
More informationVicinity Map. Interstate 605 (I-605) and State Route 91 (SR-91) in Los Angeles County
07 - LA - 605 - PM 2.87/PM 6.36 07 - LA - 91 - PM 14.10/PM 19.81 Vicinity Map N On Routes Interstate 605 (I-605) and State Route 91 (SR-91) in Los Angeles County I-605 between Excelsior Dr UC (PM 6.36)
More informationSCS Scenario Planning
E SCS Scenario Planning Introduction As part of the 2035 MTP/SCS process, AMBAG developed a series of land use and transportation alternative scenarios for evaluation and testing to demonstrate how the
More informationChapter 6 Freight Plan
Chapter 6 Freight Plan Overview This chapter presents a review and assessment of needs, deficiencies, policies and improvement options affecting the freight transportation system within the Medford Urban
More informationI-25 South Gap Project
I-25 South Gap Project Monument to Castle Rock I-25 Gap Coalition Meeting April 26, 2018 EA Schedule/Key Dates EA Release April 27, 2018 EA Comment Period = 30 days, ends May 28, 2018 Media Briefing April
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-12 RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN: 2017-2020 WHEREAS, the Southeastern
More informationBow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee
Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee December 15, 2016 Agenda Project History / Project Development Process Traffic Modeling Alternatives Development o
More informationReconstruction Project Update
I-65/I-70 North Split Interchange Reconstruction Project Update September 18, 2017 Agenda Welcome/introductions Project overview Scope and limits Need Environmental Assessment Maintenance of traffic Financial
More informationConceptual Design Report
Conceptual Design Report I-244/Arkansas River Multimodal Bridge Tulsa, Oklahoma Prepared for the Oklahoma Department of Transportation Prepared by: August 2009 I-244 / ARKANSAS RIVER MULTIMODAL BRIDGE
More informationProgress Report Regional Express & Bus Rapid Transit Program
Progress Report Regional Express & Bus Rapid Transit Program ST Express Bus routes serve urban centers in Snohomish, King, and Pierce. March 2018 Prepared by Project Control & VE l Design, Engineering
More information6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS
6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS 6.1 MODEL RUN SUMMARY NOTEBOOK The Model Run Summary Notebook (under separate cover) provides documentation of the multiple
More informationRequest for Proposal (RFP 13-02)
Request for Proposal (RFP 13-02) for Preparation of Scoping and Project Report, Environmental Document, Plans, Specifications and Estimate for I-680 North Segment Express Lane Conversion Posted on website
More informationMOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
6 MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS BACK OF SECTION DIVIDER 6.0 Mobility and Alternatives Analysis Travel demand analysis provides a framework for the identification of transportation facilities and services
More informationCHAPTER 8 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
CHAPTER 8 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Section 8.01 Purpose: The purpose of this Chapter (element) is to establish the desired and projected transportation system within Niceville and to plan for future motorized
More informationINTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS APPENDIX
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS APPENDIX Southern California Association of Governments ADOPTED APRIL 2012 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Introduction 1 Existing System Description 1 Existing System
More information4.9 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
4.9 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.9 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION This section describes the current transportation setting for and generally assesses the impacts of future dairy development on the
More informationCROWS LANDING CORRIDOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK CROWS LANDING CORRIDOR PLAN INTRODUCTION: StanCOG proposes the Crows Landing Corridor Plan (Plan), which is needed to determine the feasibility of inter-jurisdictional transportation
More informationEXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR FINANCIAL PROJECT ID TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSM&O) GENERAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR FINANCIAL PROJECT ID 432430-1-32-13 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSM&O) GENERAL CONSULTANT SERVICES DISTRICT TWO November 27, 2017 Page 1 EXHIBIT A SCOPE
More informationI-74 Final Design Request For Proposal
Dear Consultants: Introduction I-74 Final Design Request For Proposal Iowa Department of Transportation (In cooperation with Illinois Department of Transportation) October 5, 2007 The Iowa Department of
More informationEngineering Design Services for Safety Improvements along CR 476 from the Hernando County Line to US 301 (SR 35) Sumter County, Florida
Engineering Design Services for Safety Improvements along CR 476 from the Hernando County Line to US 301 (SR 35) Sumter County, Florida November 7, 2014 SUBMITTED BY: Dewberry Bowyer-Singleton 520 South
More informationLOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM GENERAL SUBJECT: Design Exceptions / Waivers SPECIFIC SUBJECT: Design Exception Request Form
More informationPeninsula Widening. Project Description. Overview of Project Status. Estimated Total Project Cost $4.7 - $7.3 Billion
Peninsula Widening SYSTEM: Interstate FROM: I-664 (Hampton Roads) TO: I-95 (Richmond) DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Provide for increased capacity, improve safety standards and minimize roadway geometric and structural
More informationThe Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges
The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges I. ABSTRACT Keith A. Riniker, PE, PTOE This paper presents the Folded Interchange design and compares
More informationSan Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (FCMS) Phase 1 Report
San Francisco Freeway Corridor Management Study (FCMS) Phase 1 Report This Report summarizes the study s purpose and institutional setting; proposes a framework of Goals and Objectives for freeway corridor
More informationMEMORANDUM. Date: July 14, 2006 Project #: To: US 97 & US 20 Refinement Plan Steering Committee
MEMORANDUM Date: July 14, 2006 Project #: 6389 To: US 97 & US 20 Refinement Plan Steering Committee From: Sonia Hennum, P.E., Andrew Cibor, E.I.T., & Julia Kuhn, P.E. Project: US 97 & US 20 Refinement
More informationInterchange Workshop Report (August 2004)
U.S. Highway 14 Corridor Study New Ulm to North Mankato Table of Contents Section Interchange Workshop Report (August 2004) Page 1. Introduction and Next Steps 1 2. Interchange Workshop Participants &
More informationAgenda Item B.9 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: May 19, 2015
CPMS Agenda Item B.9 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: May 19, 2015 TO: FROM: Mayor and Councilmembers Rosemarie Gaglione, Public Works Director CONTACT: James Winslow, Sr. Project Manager SUBJECT: Amendment
More informationI-69 Angelina and Nacogdoches Counties Scoping Study Executive Summary
I-69 Angelina and Nacogdoches Counties Scoping Study Executive Summary November 2013 The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is working to find the most appropriate means to develop the Interstate
More informationCONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. 2/25/2015 Draft
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2/25/2015 Draft [BLANK PAGE] 2016 SBCAG BOARD MEMBERSHIP ROSTER SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DISTRICT THIRD DISTRICT FOURTH DISTRICT FIFTH DISTRICT Member
More informationTransportation Update
Transportation Update Projects Underway Norview Avenue About the Project: The Norview Avenue Interchange Improvement Project will eliminate the existing weave movement associated with the on- and off-ramps
More informationDESIGN & CONSTRUCTION BUDGET AND FIVE YEAR CIP PROJECT SUMMARY - ZONE 1 FISCAL YEARS THROUGH
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION BUDGET AND FIVE YEAR CIP PROJECT SUMMARY - ZONE 1 FISCAL YEARS 2018-19 THROUGH 2022-23 Project Number Stg No. Project
More informationHighway Construction Program
Highway Construction Program Monthly Delivery Progress Report Watch List February 2017 This report focuses on Capital Highway Program projects, which have, or may have significant changes in scope, schedule,
More informationINTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT
INTERSTATE 75 AND STATE ROAD 884 (COLONIAL BOULEVARD) INTERCHANGE LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation District One May 2017 Interchange
More informationFACT SHEETS LOS ANGELES COUNTY
FACT SHEETS LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHAT IS THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY (RTP/SCS) Every four years the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) prepares a
More informationEIGHT PLANNING FACTORS
EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS Under the provisions of SAFETEA-LU, all Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are required to consider eight (8) broad planning factors in the development of multi-modal transportation
More informationFuture Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis
4.2.10 Future Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis For the five Build Alternatives, study intersections within one mile of potential station locations were analyzed, as it
More information35 Moving Forward. O p t i m i z a t i o n P l a n E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y. Project # KA Johnson and Wyandotte Counties
Moving Forward Johnson and Wyandotte Counties Project # -106-KA-2597-01 O p t i m i z a t i o n P l a n E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y June 2013 I- Corridor Optimization Plan Executive Summary Study Purpose
More informationCHAPTER 1 PROPOSED PROJECT
CHAPTER 1 PROPOSED PROJECT 1.1 INTRODUCTION The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), propose to
More informationCommunity Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2. June 22, 2006
Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2 June 22, 2006 Introductions The Study Team KDOT Wichita Partners Consultants CAC members Overview Today s Agenda Opinion Survey Study Status Starting Concept
More information2016/2017 Organizational Chart. Effective 7/1/2016 Budgeted 29 FTE Positions Budgeted 1 Part-Time Position Budgeted 4 Intern Positions
2016/2017 Organizational Chart Effective 7/1/2016 ed 29 FTE Positions ed 1 Part-Time Position ed 4 Intern Positions Ricardo Sandoval Administrative Secretary (1) Transportation/Land Development Project
More information5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 5.1 INTRODUCTION A preliminary environmental review was performed on the proposed freeway improvements that form Concept C, which encompasses the three freeway corridors
More informationContra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT February 15, 2017 Page 2 of 3 Background MTC is expected to seek authorization from the State Legis
Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: February 15, 2017 Subject Summary of Issues Regional Measure 3 (RM3) Candidate Projects for Submittal to the Metropolitan Transportation
More informationFACT SHEETS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FACT SHEETS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY WHAT IS THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY (RTP/SCS) Every four years the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) prepares
More informationWhat is the Dakota County Principal Arterial Study?
What is the Dakota County Principal Arterial Study? The Dakota County is underway and will address future designations of certain highways as Principal Arterials. What Are Principal Arterials? Principal
More informationThe Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element
Roadways The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) The Indian Nations Council of Governments is the designated regional planning organization for the Tulsa Transportation Management Area (TMA).
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. for improving the efficiency, mobility, reliability, and safety of this critical transportation corridor.
TxDOT I-45 Freight Corridor Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Interstate 45 (I 45), linking Galveston, Houston and Dallas is the most heavily traversed multimodal freight corridor in Texas. The highway element of
More informationDECEMBER P R O G R E S S R E P O R T
DECEMBER 201 2 P R O G R E S S R E P O R T The My 35 Plan is a dynamic document and will continue to be re-evaluated and updated by the Committee as needed. The My 35 Plan contains the ideas and recommendations
More informationContra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT October 15, 2014 Page 2 of 3 Options The Authority could elect to not approve this request. However
Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: October 15, 2014 Subject Summary of Issues State Route 4 Widening Loveridge Road to Somersville Road (Project 1406/3003) No. 6 to Agreement
More informationNORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV
Noise Technical Report 2015 Addendum NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum PREPARED FOR: Federal Highway Administration and Georgia Department of Transportation PREPARED BY: Parsons Brinckerhoff Project
More informationChapter 5. Congestion Management Program. Chapter 5
Chapter 5 Congestion Management Program Chapter 5 67 Chapter 5 Congestion Management Program Enacted in the early 1990s, California s Congestion Management Program (CMP) statutes encourage local jurisdictions
More informationOn behalf of the Carolina Crossroads project team we thank you for taking the time to attend this meeting.
On behalf of the Carolina Crossroads project team we thank you for taking the time to attend this meeting. Located in the heart of South Carolina, the I-20/26/126 Corridor is the crossroads of the state
More informationTable of Contents. Table of Figures
Table of Contents ES 1 EECUTIVE SUMMARY... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. OVERVIEW OF EISTING CONDITIONS IN THE UNION PACIFIC COAST LINE... 2 2.1 Description of the Project Area... 2 2.2 Current Infrastructure
More informationTRANSPORTATION PROJECT REPORT DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002
TRANSPORTATION INTERSTATE 87 INTERCHANGE 11A TOWN OF MALTA SARATOGA COUNTY, NY DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002 PROJECT REPORT NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JOSEPH
More informationNotice of Preparation For Link Union Station (Link US) Project. Joint Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report
Notice of Preparation For Link Union Station (Link US) Project Joint Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report Date: May 27, 2016 To: Subject: Project Title: From: All Interested Agencies,
More informationInformational Brochure. Proposed Interchange. Interstate Route 295 (I-295) AT Greenville Avenue (State Route 5) Town of Johnston, Rhode Island
Informational Brochure Proposed Interchange OF Interstate Route 295 (I-295) AT Greenville Avenue (State Route 5) Town of Johnston, Rhode Island October 5, 2016 Department of Transportation Two Capitol
More informationState Route 710 North Environmental Study Update Online Media Briefing July 12, 2013
State Route 710 North Environmental Study Update Online Media Briefing July 12, 2013 Frank Quon, P.E. Executive Officer, Metro Highway Program Michelle Smith, P.E. Project Manager, Metro Highway Program
More informationTRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN AND COUNTY REGULATIONS VISION FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ROAD NETWORK SECTION 7
TRANSPORTATION Like many growing western counties, Douglas County focuses on one of the most integral elements in land-use planning: transportation. The primary purpose of a transportation network is to
More informationIH 30/IH 35E Reconstruction Project Pegasus Final Technical Memorandum - Evaluation of Conceptual Alternatives Task 7.5
MEMO TO: Timothy Nesbitt, P.E. DATE: August 26, 2002 FROM: SUBJECT: Sandy Wesch-Schulze, P.E., AICP IH 30/IH 35E Reconstruction Project Pegasus Final Technical Memorandum - Evaluation of Conceptual Alternatives
More informationLOCATION HYDRAULIC REPORT
Draft LOCATION HYDRAULIC REPORT Florida Department of Transportation District One US 41 at Fruitville Road (CR 780) Intersection Improvements - PD&E STUDY Sarasota County, Florida Financial Project ID
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 3A 1
Article 3A. Transportation Systems in and around Municipalities. 136-66.1. Responsibility for streets inside municipalities. Responsibility for streets and highways inside the corporate limits of municipalities
More informationCUY-90-Innerbelt ODOT PID No 77510
CUY-90-Innerbelt ODOT PID No 77510 Chapter 1: Project History and Background Figure 1-1: Innerbelt Study Area Points of Interest 1.0 Introduction Planned in the 1940s and built during the 1950s and early
More informationARROWS RANSPORTATION LAN
ARROWS RANSPORTATION LAN Developed by the Transportation Planning Division Of the Virginia Department of Transportation In Cooperation With The U.S. Department Of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
More information2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement
2 Purpose and Need 2.1 Study Area Interstate 81 (I-81) is relied upon for local and regional travel and interstate travel in the eastern United States. It extends 855 miles from Tennessee to New York at
More informationDRAFT. SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0
SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0 October 9, 2017 Contents 1 Purpose of ICE Memo... 1 2 Background... 1 3 Existing Interchange Deficiencies... 1 4 Context Sensitive
More informationFinal Air Quality Report
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Final Air Quality Report PD&E Study From East of Babcock Street (SR 507) to US 1 Brevard County, Florida Financial Project ID: 430136-1-22-01 ETDM Project Number: 13026
More information04 ALA /6.7. Vicinity Map
04 ALA 80 6.5/6.7 04 ALA 80 6.5/6.7 Vicinity Map Note: I-80 is designated as an east-west freeway. Gilman Street is referred to as a northsouth urban arterial for the remainder of the report. 04 ALA 80
More informationAB 758, as amended, Eggman. Transportation: Tri-Valley San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority.
AB 758, as amended, Eggman. Transportation: Tri-Valley San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority. Existing law provides for the creation of statewide and local transportation agencies, which may be established
More informationTable of Contents SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN i
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS... I SECTION 1: 2015 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE... 1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN... 8 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2019... 9 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2025... 15 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2035...
More information