REQUEST FOR DEROGATION TO USE STRYCHNINE FOR THE CONTROL OF POCKET GOPHERS
|
|
- Horatio Black
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REQUEST FOR DEROGATION TO USE STRYCHNINE FOR THE CONTROL OF POCKET GOPHERS The northern pocket gopher (Thomomys talpoides) is a rodent native to the northwestern United States. Pocket gophers are fossorial animals, spending most of their time solitarily in underground burrow systems (Engeman and Witmer 2000). Gophers feed on a variety of vegetation, and can be considered keystone species in some systems due to their ability to dramatically alter both soil and vegetation structure (Cantor and Whitham 1989, Reichman and Seabloom 2002). Pocket gophers, like many rodents, have high population growth rates and are able to quickly colonize and re-colonize suitable habitat even when their populations have been reduced (Engeman and Campbell 1999, Sullivan et al. 2001). Pocket gophers account for more damage to regenerating forests in the western U.S. than all other animals combined (Crouch 1986, Borrecco and Black 1990). Repeated complete failures at reforestation are not uncommon, sometimes resulting in non-forested conditions lasting for decades (Barnes 1978). Pocket gophers damage and kill large percentages of conifer seedlings in Idaho by feeding on their roots and stems (Graham and Kingery 1990, Ferguson and Adams 1994, Ferguson 1999). Regeneration failure is common in areas with high gopher densities. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) mission is...to promote environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world s forests. Good forest management should balance the three legs of FSC s mission. This mission is further articulated in FSC s 10 Principles and Criteria, of which Criteria 6.6 defines chemicals that are banned by FSC. Banned chemicals are those that are either: 1) WHO Type 1A or 1B (toxic to humans), 2) chlorinated hydrocarbons, 3) have high persistence (half life >100 days), 4) high toxicity (LD50 up to 200mg/kg), 5) carcinogens, mutagens, or endocrine disruptors, or 6) banned by international agreement. Although strychnine is banned by FSC due to its potential high toxicity to humans and other vertebrates, this application for derogation shows that it is the only feasible method for the control of pocket gophers in regenerating forests. Furthermore, we provide strong evidence that the application method used for pocket gophers virtually eliminates the risk of consumption by other vertebrates, and poses no adverse environmental impacts, and therefore its use in controlling pocket gophers is in the best interest of promoting FSC s goals. A variety of methods are available to control pocket gopher damage in regenerating forests, although all are not equally effective (Case and Jasch 1994, Engeman and Witmer 2000; see Table 1). Cultural methods include modifying habitat through harvest prescription or site preparation before regeneration, as well as planting unpalatable or genetically-resistant stock (Engeman and Witmer 2000). Harvest prescriptions that result in early-seral vegetative conditions also favor pocket gophers (Marsh and Steele 1992) by creating an abundance of preferred food composed of grasses, forbs, and conifer seedlings. These prescriptions are often necessary in order to restore the stand to the proper tree species composition. Harvest prescriptions that result in natural regeneration often perform better than planted stands (Marsh 1
2 and Steele 1992). However, successful natural regeneration is unpredictable, especially of ecologically-appropriate tree species. In our area, pocket gopher sites will have natural Table 1. Summary of relative cost-effectiveness of gopher damage management techniques. Method Cost Effectiveness Population Reduction Strychnine Baiting Low High (70-80% pop. reduction) Zinc Phosphide Baiting Low Mod Fumigants Low Low (20% pop. reduction) Trapping High (>6x baiting) Mod (45-60% pop. reduction) Enhance Predation Mod Low Habitat Manipulation Herbicides High Mod Burning High Mod Sheep/cattle grazing Low Mod Barriers Plastic tubing High High (some root deformities) Repellents High Low Silvicultural Natural Regeneration Mod-High Mod Planting Resistant Stock Low Low Larger Seedling Size High Low Increase Stocking Rate High Mod (Engeman and Witmer 2000, Brian Moser unpublished data) regeneration overwhelmingly dominated by grand fir (Abies grandis), while our ecologicallyappropriate target species mix includes western white pine (Pinus monticola), western larch (Larix occidentalis), ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Site preparation such as burning and herbicides can be used to reduce suitable gopher habitat (Engeman and Witmer 2000) by reducing their food supply. We prefer to use herbicides sparingly as they can be costly and also have the potential to reduce habitat for other wildlife. In addition, site preparation methods only suppress vegetation for 2-5 years, after which gopher habitat becomes suitable again. Currently, no gopher resistant tree varieties have been bred, although some species appear to be relatively more resistant (Ferguson 1999). Physical controls include both exclusionary devices and traps (Engeman and Witmer 2000). Vexar tubing has been used to effectively protect seedlings and their roots from gopher damage (Anthony et al. 1978, Engeman et al. 1997, Engeman et al. 1999, Pipas and Witmer 1999). However, the extremely high cost of this method precludes its use in most situations. In addition, the possibility of root deformation and constriction makes it unpractical (Ellis 1972). Trapping has long been used to control pocket gophers with mixed success (Marsh 1998a, Witmer et al. 1999). Potlatch research has shown that trapping is only 45-62% effective in reducing gopher populations, and costs over 6 times that of baiting (Morrow 2004, Potlatch Corp. unpublished data). 2
3 Biological control through predation has often been hailed as a natural approach to pest management (Moore et al. 1998). Although predator habitat can be enhanced (Moore et al. 1998), no studies have demonstrated effective control of gopher populations through predator enhancement (Marsh 1998b). Induced infertility is another method of biological control that is still in its infancy (Miller and Fagerstone 2000). Although this approach shows promise, there are many biological and regulatory hurdles before this becomes a cost-effective method to control gopher reproductive rates (Miller and Fagerstone 2000). Chemical controls include toxicants and repellents (Engeman and Witmer 2000). Repellents would appear to be a humane way to reduce gopher damage, although no studies have found a cost-effective method to do so (Witmer et al. 1998, Sterner et al. 1999), especially since gophers are fossorial and for a repellent to protect tree roots it must be applied underground and persist for many months including the spring snowmelt season when a significant flux of water moves through the soil. Toxicants are the most cost-effective chemical control, and strychnine alkaloid is the most costeffective gopher control method used in the western U.S. (Engeman and Witmer 2000). Strychnine is an alkaloid derived from the seeds of Strychnos nux vomica, a native tree of India. It is an acute toxicant that results in quick death when toxic amounts are consumed. Strychnine is banned by FSC only due to its potential toxicity to vertebrates. It is not a chlorinated hydrocarbon, has low persistence, is not a carcinogen, mutagen, or endocrine disruptor, and is not banned by international agreement. Although strychnine is highly toxic, its applicator exposure risk is low and it has a low hazard to non-target animals and for secondary poisoning. Strychnine is applied to grain bait entirely below ground. Application rates range from 0.25 to 1.0 lbs of 0.5% strychnine bait per acre. Once placed below ground the hole is covered with soil. Because gophers vigorously defend their burrows, intrusion of the burrow and consumption of bait by other species is unlikely. Furthermore, caches of bait degrade quickly. Strychnine alkaloid has a half-life of <30 days, and 90% degradation after 40 days (Starr 1993). Studies have shown that limited numbers of ground squirrels and other burrowing rodents may accidentally be poisoned, but that the impact on those populations is minimal (Fagerstone et al. 1980, Anthony et al. 1984, El Hani et al. 2002). Secondary poisoning can only occur if an animal consumes the digestive tract of a dead gopher, because strychnine does not accumulate in tissues. In fact, a scavenger would have to consume a lethal dose at one time, since strychnine does not accumulate over time. Scavenging of dead gophers is highly unlikely as most gophers die underground (Barnes et al. 1985). The only animals that might consume them are small mustelids, which are not usually scavengers. Birds of prey and threatened species such as grizzly bears are unlikely to be affected by strychnine baiting (Anthony et al. 1984, Barnes et al. 1985). Strychnine does not persist long in the environment. Furthermore, strychnine alkaloid binds strongly to soil particles and is not water soluble, thus there is limited movement of strychnine in the environment (Smith 1982). Vegetation does not take up strychnine in detectable quantities, 3
4 therefore the risk of an herbivore consuming strychnine is small (Smith 1982). Because strychnine is applied underground and away from water sources, binds to soil particles, and is not water soluble, the probability of water contamination is nearly zero. If small amounts did reach water, they would be so diluted as to not be toxic. Since strychnine does not accumulate in tissues, multiple sublethal doses would have no adverse effects on aquatic flora and fauna. Both the Clearwater and Nez Perce National Forests have conducted thorough Environmental Assessments for the use of strychnine baiting on National Forests, as required by the U.S. National Environmental Protection Act (U.S. Forest Service 1993a,b). Both have concluded that strychnine is not only the most cost-effective method of gopher abatement, but that it is also an environmentally-safe alternative. Without the use of strychnine, we have two alternatives. Either forgo the harvest on nearly 2000 acres each year, or accept failed regeneration on those acres. The latter is simply not possible in Idaho where forest lands must be regenerated by state law. The former represents a substantial amount of foregone revenue and over many years puts tens of thousands of acres on a trajectory for significant forest health issues that may ultimately be manifested in catastrophic wildfire. Because our acres subject to gopher damage tend to be geographically concentrated, the wildfire concern is even further heightened. We believe that neither of these alternatives are in the best interest of achieving FSC s mission. Literature Cited Anthony, R.M., and V.G. Barnes, Jr Vexar plastic netting to reduce pocket gopher depredation of conifer seedlings. Vert. Pest Conf. 8: Anthony, R.M., G.D. Lindsey, and J. Evans Hazards to golden-mantled ground squirrels and associated secondary hazard potential from strychnine for forest pocket gophers. Vert. Pest Conf. 11: Barnes, V.G., R.M. Anthony, K.A. Fagerstone, and J. Evans Hazards to grizzly bears of strychnine baiting for pocket gopher control. Wildlife Society Bulletin 13: Borrecco, J.E., and H.C. Black Animal damage problems and control activities on National Forest system lands. Vert. Pest Conf. 14: Case, R.M., and B.A. Jasch Pocket Gophers. Pages B17-B29 in S.E. Hygnstrom, R.M. Timm, and G.E. Larson, eds. Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension, Lincoln, Nebraska. Cantor, L.F., and T.G. Whitham Importance of belowground herbivory: pocket gophers may limit aspen to rock outcrop refugia. Ecology 70: Crouch, G.L Pocket gopher damage to conifers in western forests: a historical and current perspective on teh problem and its control. Vert. Pest Conf. 12: El Hani, A., D.L. Nolte, J.R. Mason, and S. Bulkin Response of nontarget species to underground strychnine baiting for pocket gohper in southwest Oregon. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 17:9-13. Ellis, G.R Plastic mesh tubes constrict root development after two years. Tree Planter s Notes 23: Engeman, R.M., R.M. Anthony, H.W. Krupa,and J. Evans The effects of Vexar seeling protectors on the growth and developement of lodgepole pine roots. Crop Protection 16: Engeman, R.M., and D.L. Campbell Pocket gopher reoccupation of burrow systems following population reduction. Crop Protection 18: Engeman.R.M., R.M. Anthony, V.G. Barnes, Jr., H.W. Krupa, and J. Evans Evaluations of plastic mesh tubes for protecting conifer seedlings from pocket gophers in three western states. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 14: Engeman, R.M., and G.W. Witmer Integrated management tactics for predicting and alleviating pocket gopher (Thomomys spp.) damage to conifer reforestation plantings. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 5: Fagerstone, K.A., V.G. Barnes, Jr., R.M. Anthony, and J. Evans Hazards to small mammals associated with underground strychnine baiting for pocket gophers. Vert. Pest Conf. 9: Ferguson, D.E Effects of pocket gophers, bracken fern, and western coneflower on planted conifers in northern Idaho an update and two more species. New Forests 18: Graham, R.T., and J.L. Kingery Seedling damage and mortality of conifer plantations on transitory ranges in northern and central Idaho. Vert. Pest Conf. 14: Marsh, R.E. 1998a. One hundred years of pocket gopher traps and trapping. Vert. Pest Conf. 18: Marsh, R.E. 1998b. Barn owl boxes offer no solution to pocket gopher damage. Vert. Pest Conf. 18: Miller, L.A., and K.A. Fagerstone Induced fertility as a wildlife damage management tool. Vert. Pest Conf. 19: Moore, T., D. Van Vuren, and C. Ingels Are barn owls a biological control for gophers? Evaluating effectiveness in vineyards and orchards. Vert. Pest Conf. 18:
5 Pipas, M.J., and G.W. Witmer Evaluation of physical barriers to protect ponderosa pine seedlings from pocket gophers. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 14: Reichman, O.J., and E.W. Seabloom The role of pocket gophers as subterranean ecosystem engineers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: Smith, H.G Strychnine residue studies and their implications in rodent control. Vert. Pest Conf. 10: Starr, R.I Strychnine aerobic soil metabolism: status of completed studies with recommendations for future aerobic soil research. USDA APHIS Denver Wildlife Research Center. Unpublished Report. Sterner, R.T., K.A. Hollenbeck, and S.A. Shumake Capsicum-laden soils decrease contact time by northern pocket gophers. Physiology and Behavior 67: Sullivan, T.P., D.S. Sullivan, and E.J. Hogue. Reinvasion dynamics of northern pocket gopher (Thomomys talpoides) populations in removal areas. Crop Protection 20: U.S. Forest Service. 1993a. Management for pocket gopher damage: environmental assessment. Clearwater National Forest. U.S. Forest Service. 1993b. Management for pocket gopher damage: environmental assessment. Nez Perce National Forest. Witmer, G.W., M.J. Pipas, and J.C. Bucher Field tests of denatonium benzoate to reduce seedling damage by pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides Rich.). Crop Protection 17: Witmer, G.W., R.E. Marsh, and G.H. Matschke Trapping considerations for the fossorial pocket gopher. Pages in G. Proulx, ed. Mammal Trapping. Alpha Wildlife Research and Management Ltd., Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada. 5
VERTEBRATE PESTS LEARNING OBJECTIVES
C 9 H A P TE R VERTEBRATE PESTS LEARNING OBJECTIVES After completely studying this chapter, you should: Know the types of damage caused by various vertebrate pests and when it is necessary to apply control
More informationPeter H. Singleton John F. Lehmkuhl. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Wenatchee Forestry Sciences Lab
Peter H. Singleton John F. Lehmkuhl USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Wenatchee Forestry Sciences Lab Talk Overview: Wildlife community associated with MMC Considerations for wildlife
More informationResource Use. Questions 1-3 refer to the diagram above.
Resource Use Questions 1-3 refer to the diagram above. 1. Which part of the diagram depicts the resource use that would be in competition if a new species moves into an area and is in direct competition
More informationNeeded: Guidelines for Defining Acceptable Advance Regeneration
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Ogden, UT 84401 Research Note INT- 341 July 1984 Needed: Guidelines for Defining Acceptable Advance
More informationPlantation Forestry: A Global Look
Plantation Forestry: A Global Look Forest Area: 3,952,025,000 ha Woodland Area: 1,375,829,000 ha Annual World Wood Removal + + 620,138,943 m 3 wood (USDA 2008) 620,138,943 m 3 wood (USDA 2008) 620,138,943
More informationMANAGEMENT OF RODENT POPULATIONS AT AIRPORTS
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection
More informationVole Damage Control in Forest Plantations. Hailu Sharew, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service,
Hailu Sharew, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service, 8602 Gambrill Park Road, Frederick, Maryland 21702; and Jonathan S. Kays, University of Maryland Cooperative Extension, 18330 Keedysville
More informationLow-intensity fire burning on the forest floor. High-intensity crown fire
Forest Fires: Answers to 12 Common Questions 1. Is wildfire bad for forests? No. Some forests need fire to be healthy, but it has to be the type of fire that the forest evolved with. Low-intensity fire
More informationPhoto Guide for Assessing Wildfire Severity Peter Kolb (PhD) Montana State Extension Forestry Specialist
Photo Guide for Assessing Wildfire Severity Peter Kolb (PhD) Montana State Extension Forestry Specialist 25% scorch 50% scorch 75% scorch 90% scorch Ponderosa pine 90% survival if stem cambium has not
More informationMeadow Voles. Are they taking over the world?! Ronda Hirnyck University of Idaho Extension Pesticide Specialist
Meadow Voles Are they taking over the world?! Ronda Hirnyck University of Idaho Extension Pesticide Specialist Thanks to the following for use of pictures: Dr. Oliver Neher, TASCO Danielle Gunn, UI Extension
More informationAppendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response
Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response Treatment objectives within the matrix are a combination of objectives for silvicultural, fuels,
More informationWildlife Resources Report
Wildlife Resources Report Butte Mountain Late Successional Reserve Habitat Restoration Project Goosenest Ranger District, Klamath National Forest Prepared by: Karen West, Wildlife Biologist, USDI Fish
More informationMANITOBA ENVIROTHON WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS
MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS Outcome Water and Aquatic Ecosystems as Resources Properties of Water, Water Bodies and Watersheds, and Aquatic Species Identification A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
More information97330, USA. 2
The Importance of Forest Stand Level Inventory to Sustain Multiple Forest Values in the Presence of Endangered Species Debora L. Johnson 1, K. Norman Johnson 2 and David W. Hann 2 1 Oregon State University,
More informationFire Resilience in Moist Mixed Conifer Forests. Penelope Morgan Dept. Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences University of Idaho
Fire Resilience in Moist Mixed Conifer Forests Penelope Morgan Dept. Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences University of Idaho pmorgan@uidaho.edu We live in a fire environment School Fire, Photo by Leigh
More informationCOOLEY SPRUCE GALL APHID (ADELGES COOLEYI) AND OTHER ADELGID SPECIES IN B.C.
Cone and Seed Insect Pest Leaflet No. 14 British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range, Tree Improvement Branch, Saanichton, BC COOLEY SPRUCE GALL APHID (ADELGES COOLEYI) AND OTHER ADELGID SPECIES IN
More informationIntroduction. Methodology for Analysis
Scenic Report Prepared by: /s/gary Kedish Natural Resources Specialist for: Warner Mountain Ranger District Modoc National Forest January 20, 2016 Introduction This report focuses on the Visual Quality
More informationAPPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES
APPENDIX A VEGETATION TREATMENTS APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY This table provides information about the proposed treatment units including the existing conditions, the proposed treatment,
More informationWildlife Conservation Strategy
Wildlife Conservation Strategy Boise National Forest What is the Wildlife Conservation Strategy? The Boise National Forest is developing a Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS) in accordance with its Land
More informationNew Mexico Forest Restoration Principles
New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Preamble These principles were collaboratively developed by a team of dedicated professionals representing industry, conservation organizations, land management
More informationThe Regeneration of Aspen Stands in Southern Utah
The Regeneration of Aspen Stands in Southern Utah By: Justin Britton, Justin DeRose, James Long, Karen Mock, Darren McAvoy Background Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) is an important species in southern
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the
More informationPros and Cons of Salvage and Restoration Operations
Pros and Cons of Salvage and Restoration Operations February 10, 2010 John Sessions College of Forestry Oregon State University Oregon Society of American Foresters Position Statement (2008) The OSAF supports
More informationPESTICIDES. Adapted from K. Sturges
PESTICIDES Adapted from K. Sturges Pests and Pesticides A Pest- any organism that damages crops valuable to us interferes with human welfare or activities Weed- any plant that competes with crops To suppress
More informationAspen Ecology. Read Hessl, Why have a whole lecture for a single species?
Aspen Ecology Read Hessl, 2002 11/16/09 1 Why have a whole lecture for a single species? Populus tremuloides is the most widespread tree in N. America and 2 nd most widely distributed tree species in the
More informationBig Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action
Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action Project Background and 2014 Farm Bill The Big Hill Insect and Disease project on the Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District of the Salmon-Challis National
More informationLecture 3.4: Fire effects on vegetation
Lecture 3.4: Fire effects on vegetation First-order fire effects Occur during or immediately after a fire Localized to the burned area Some examples of 1 st order fire effects: Burned or scorched foliage
More informationMountain Pine Beetle Management in Canada s Mountain National Parks
Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Canada s Mountain National Parks Dave Dalman Ecosystem Secretariat Manager, Banff National Park of Canada, Banff Field Unit, Box 900, Banff, AB T1L 1K2 Abstract Coordinated
More informationCentral Texas vegetation: the role of fire
Central Texas vegetation: the role of fire or Why conservation land managers are pyromaniacs Norma Fowler, Professor Section of Integrative Biology University of Texas at Austin fire-controlled plant communities
More informationEffect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on Ponderosa Pine Seedling Survival and Growth
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station http://www.psw.fs.fed.us/ Research Paper PSW-RP-242 Effect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on
More informationAPPALACHIAN AND MIXED MESOPHYTIC FORESTS. Isabel Williams, Sykes Williams, Karlo Mercado
APPALACHIAN AND MIXED MESOPHYTIC FORESTS Isabel Williams, Sykes Williams, Karlo Mercado Group Slide (1) Characteristics Once covered most of temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere As of today, only
More informationFire History in the Colorado Rockies
Fire History in the Colorado Rockies Brief overview of fire regimes in different forest ecosystem types Relationship of wildfire activity to climate variability Effects of fire exclusion and fire suppression
More informationPLANT AND ANIMAL DIVERSITY
by the planning rule team as of. These ideas are for discussion purposes and do not What we want to achieve PLANT AND ANIMAL DIVERSITY The Forest Service is committed to protecting species and sustaining
More informationCollaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program Meg Roessing U.S.D.A. Forest Service Forest Management Staff Washington Office mroessing@fs.fed.us Background: Department and Agency Priority Our shared
More informationWisconsin County Forests Association Position Statement Relating To White Tailed Deer Herd Management in Wisconsin
Wisconsin County Forests Association Position Statement Relating To White Tailed Deer Herd Management in Wisconsin Concern Recent legislative decisions appear to place a greater emphasis on social and
More informationOchoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains
[3410-11- P] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Ochoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains Forest Resiliency Project AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION:
More informationForest Biomes. Chapter 9
Forest Biomes Chapter 9 9.1 Objectives ~Describe the characteristics of the coniferous forest. ~Explain adaptations that enable organisms to survive in coniferous forests. 9.1 Coniferous Forests Coniferous
More informationChapter 30. Conserving Earth s Biodiversity
Chapter 30 Conserving Earth s Biodiversity Chapter 30 At a Glance What Is Conservation Biology? Why Is Biodiversity Important? Is Earth s Biodiversity Diminishing? What Are the Major Threats to Biodiversity?
More informationSKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest
SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest I. Introduction The Laurentian Ranger District of the Superior National Forest is proposing management activities within
More informationElk and Vegetation Management in Rocky Mountain National Park: Research and Planning. Therese L. Johnson and Ryan Monello
Elk and Vegetation Management in Rocky Mountain National Park: Research and Planning Therese L. Johnson and Ryan Monello BACKGROUND ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK MISSION The purpose of Rocky Mountain National
More informationCANADA. INFORMAL SUBMISSION TO THE AWG-KP Information and Data on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) September 2009
CANADA INFORMAL SUBMISSION TO THE AWG-KP Information and Data on Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) September 2009 1. INTRODUCTION Canada believes that improvements to LULUCF rules should
More informationGuide to the City of San Francisco s Reduced Risk Pesticide List Revised February 2013
Guide to the City of San Francisco s Reduced Risk Pesticide List Revised February 2013 Introduction The City of San Francisco Department of the Environment s (SFE) Reduced-Risk Pesticide List is the result
More informationRAINFOREST ALLIANCE CERTIFICATION STANDARDS NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS ADDENDUM
Type of document: Scope: Status of document: Date of this version: RA Standard Canada NTFP Maple Sugaring Operations Approved Version Number: 07-12 Consultation period: Approval body: August 2012 OPEN
More informationAuger Hole Shape, Size, and Tree Placement Affect Survival and Root Form of Planted Ponderosa Pine in South Central Idaho1
Auger Hole Shape, Size, and Tree Placement Affect Survival and Root Form of Planted Ponderosa Pine in South Central Idaho1 John Sloan2 Abstract.-- Ponderosa pine seedlings (2-0) were planted in 4- and
More informationTelegraph Forest Management Project
Telegraph Forest Management Project Black Hills National Forest Northern Hills Ranger District Lawrence and Pennington Counties, South Dakota Proposed Action and Request for Comments March 2008 Table of
More informationAerial Survey Highlights for Colorado, 2016
Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado, 2016 Aerial detection surveys of tree-killing or damaging insects and diseases are conducted annually over Colorado s forestlands. This is a cooperative effort between
More informationChapter 12: Effects of Agriculture on the Environment
Chapter 12: Effects of Agriculture on the Environment How Agriculture Changes the Environment Major environmental problems Soil erosion Sediment transport and deposition downstream On-site pollution from
More informationAdaptation Options for Managing Ecosystems; Coping with Climate Change Forest Service Research and Development Support for Management of Wildlands
Adaptation Options for Managing Ecosystems; Coping with Climate Change Forest Service Research and Development Support for Management of Wildlands Peter A. Stine, Ph.D. Sierra Nevada Research Center Pacific
More informationTexas Biology Standards Review. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company 85
5.B.11.B 1 Researchers have found that a local squirrel population fluctuates from year to year, increasing one year and decreasing the next. Which of the following factors would cause the squirrel population
More informationFood Chains, Food Webs, and Bioaccumulation Background
Food Chains, Food Webs, and Bioaccumulation Background Introduction Every living organism needs energy to sustain life. Organisms within a community depend on one another for food to create energy. This
More informationENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Advanced Placement ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Agriculture + Pesticides Student 2014 Agriculture and Pesticides Food Production At present 11% of the world s land is being used to produce crops. This represents
More informationAppendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations
Appendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations July 24, 2014 Hood River Collaborative Stew Crew Objectives/Priorities: Protect the integrity of and access to recreational trails and
More informationUnit A: Introduction to Forestry. Lesson 2:Understanding Forest Ecology
Unit A: Introduction to Forestry Lesson 2:Understanding Forest Ecology 1 Terms Bole Ecology Ecosystem Forest ecology Hardening-off Hardiness Material cycle Mycorrhizae Overstory Photoperiod Stratification
More informationAG. 350 FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
AG. 350 FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT COURSE DESCRIPTION: A course designed to examine the importance of forestry, wildlife, and outdoor recreation with emphasis on efficient use of natural resources.
More informationUNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY
UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY Rolf Gersonde, 6/6/2015 Uneven-aged Management in 90 Minutes 2 Silviculture Background Forest Ecology Management Tools and Stocking Control Multi-aged
More informationIndiana Soil and Water
EXTENSION AY-363-W Indiana Soil and Water Authors Jennifer Woodyard and Eileen Kladivko Four Strategies to Improve Your Field s Soil Health Purdue Agronomy ag.purdue.edu/agry What Is Soil Health? The definition
More informationMixed Conifer Forests An Overview
Mixed Conifer Forests An Overview Thomas Spies PNW Research Station December 4, 2013 Pendleton, OR "Ecosystems are not only more complex than we think, but more complex than we can think. ---Frank Egler
More informationTimber Sale Contract/Purpose and Need/Range of Alternatives
North Fork Mill Creek Revised Project Environmental Assessment (EA) Objection Statements and Responses Hood River and Barlow Ranger Districts Mt. Hood National Forest December 2014 Objectors Bark and Oregon
More informationEarly Indiana Forestry. Current Forestry in Indiana
Tree Planting in Indiana Bob Hawkins and Phil O Connor Nursery Program Supervisor and Tree Improvement Specialist, Indiana Division of Forestry, Vallonia, IN Early Indiana Forestry In the past 100 years,
More informationFire Regimes and Pyrodiversity
ESPM 134 Scott Stephens Fire Regimes and Pyrodiversity 1) Fire regimes consist of 5 components: - A measurement of fire frequency such as the mean fire return interval or median fire return interval. Fire
More informationTreatments for preventing and controlling Scotch broom
Treatments for preventing and controlling Scotch broom Timothy B. Harrington, PNW Research Station Olympia, WA Four-year-old invasion Acknowledgements Thanks for collaboration and support from: Forest
More informationNORTH FORK MILL CREEK REVISED
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact NORTH FORK MILL CREEK REVISED USDA Forest Service Hood River and Wasco Counties, Oregon T1S, R11E, Sections 4-9; Willamette Meridian DECISION AND REASONS
More informationUngulate Herbivory in Aspen Communities. Paul Rogers, Western Aspen Alliance & Utah State University
Ungulate Herbivory in Aspen Communities Paul Rogers, Western Aspen Alliance & Utah State University Road Map 1. What s the issue? 2. Ungulates since settlement 3. Documentation methods 4. Response toolbox
More informationEcology. Quaking Aspen. Chapter 2. Quick Facts about. Geographic distribution of aspen
Ecology of Quaking Aspen Stephen Fitzgerald Quick Facts about Quaking Aspen Common names: Trembling aspen, mountain aspen, golden aspen, popple, poplar, trembling poplar Family: Willow family (Salicaceae)
More informationSpecialist Report for the Mountain Top PCT CE ~Silviculture~ Chris Roy, Forester March 15, 2015
Specialist Report for the Mountain Top PCT CE ~Silviculture~ Chris Roy, Forester March 15, 2015 Introduction The Mountain Top PCT Project is located on the Bend-Ft. Rock Ranger District of the Deschutes
More informationEffectiveness of rodenticides for managing invasive roof rats and native deer mice in orchards
Environ Sci Pollut Res (2014) 21:5795 5802 DOI 10.1007/s11356-014-2525-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Effectiveness of rodenticides for managing invasive roof rats and native deer mice in orchards Roger A. Baldwin
More information2/24/2009. The factors that determine what type of forest will grow in a region are temperature precipitation growing season soil land forms
FOREST FACTS Forestry 37% of Canada's land area covered by forests. Stretches in a continuous band from BC to NL. Commercial forests are forests that could be easily be harvested for timber. Non-commercial
More informationEstimating Biomass of Shrubs and Forbs in Central Washington Douglas-Fir Stands Craig M. Olson and Robert E. Martin
This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
More informationChapter 23 Pest Management
Chapter 23 Pest Management Overview of Chapter 23 What is a Pesticide? Benefits and Problems With Pesticides Risks of Pesticides to Human Health Alternatives to Pesticides Laws Controlling Pesticides Use
More informationProposed Action Report Big Creek WBP Enhancement Project
Proposed Action Report Big Creek WBP Enhancement Project USDA Forest Service Cascade Ranger District Boise National Forest Valley County, Idaho July 2013 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION The encroachment
More informationSpecies Dataform and Scoresheet for Hedera helix L (English ivy) Dataform and Scoresheet
Species Dataform and Scoresheet for Hedera helix L (English ivy) Dataform and Scoresheet Hedera helix L (English ivy) Native range: Europe Date evaluated: March 25, 2009 Answer Choices Response Introductory
More informationBC Hydro Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program. Hoodoo/Hofert Property Wildlife Tree Creation (Contract # )
BC Hydro Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program Hoodoo/Hofert Property Wildlife Tree Creation (Contract # 0028810) Final Report January 2008 Prepared for: Fish and Wildlife Compensation
More informationWildlife Management Intensity Standards
Habitat Control Practices Required Intensity Description Grazing Management The planned manipulation of livestock numbers and grazing intensities to increase food, The planned manipulation of livestock
More informationBiophysical Indicators of Longleaf Pine Sandhill Change. Ryan R. Jensen Department of Geography, Geology, and Anthropology
Biophysical Indicators of Longleaf Pine Sandhill Change Ryan R. Jensen Department of Geography, Geology, and Anthropology Sandhills Species Long-leaf pine Turkey oak Wiregrass Extremely rich herbaceous
More informationSeward Park s Sword Fern Die-off. Tim Billo, Kramer Canup, Tristan O Mara
Seward Park s Sword Fern Die-off Tim Billo, Kramer Canup, Tristan O Mara 1 Fragmentation and species introductions Possible additional effects of climate change Interaction of abiotic and biotic stressors
More informationCommunity: an assemblage of species living close enough together for potential interactions How do organisms of different species interact?
1 BIO 1101 Lecture 17 (Guided Notes) Chapter 20: Community Ecology 2 Community: an assemblage of species living close enough together for potential interactions How do organisms of different species interact?
More informationNancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Forest Management Nancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Material translated by: Mohammadullah Karimi, Training & Liaison Officer Afghan Conservation Corps Managing
More informationProposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015
Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015 Walking Iron County Wildlife Area is 898 acres situated in the Town of Mazomanie between Walking Iron County Park
More informationThe Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project
Introduction The Galton Project The Fortine Ranger District of the Kootenai National Forest is in the early stages of developing a project entitled Galton, named for the mountain range dominating the eastern
More informationR085XY189TX Very Shallow PZ Ecological Site
R085XY189TX Very Shallow 30-38 PZ Ecological Site Plant Community Photos 1.1 Midgrass Prairie Community Page 1 of 9 1.2 Midgrass/Shortgrass Prairie Community Page 2 of 9 2.1 Pricklypear/Shrubland Community
More informationImportant Copyright Information
NSC 2017 Winter Conference: Common Ground: Silvicultural Tools and Tactics for Diverse Ecosystems and Management Goals February 20-21, 2017 Important Copyright Information The following content is provided
More informationNorthern Rockies Lynx Management Direction Record of Decision
USDA Forest Service National Forests in Montana, and parts of Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah March 2007 Northern Rockies Lynx Management Direction Record of Decision The United States Department of Agriculture
More informationHistory and Future of Oaks in and around the San Joaquin
History and Future of Oaks in and around the San Joaquin January 24, 2011 San Joaquin County Historical Society Tom Gaman California Oaks East-West Forestry Associates, Inc. www.forestdata.com Tonight:
More informationForsythe II Project. September 2015
Forsythe II Project September 2015 The Boulder Ranger District (BRD) of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests is proposing vegetation treatments on 3,840 acres of National Forest System (NFS) lands
More informationRe: Comment on the Proposed Aspen Recovery and Reforestation Project
May 28, 2014 Aspen Recovery and Reforestation Project Interdisciplinary Team High Sierra Range District 29688 Auberry Road Prather, CA 93651 Sent via email to: comments-pacificsouthwest-sierra@fs.fed.us
More informationValue of native bees to agriculture
Value of native bees to agriculture Native bees pollinated approximately $3 billion of crops in the year 2000 There are approximately 4,000 species of native bees in North America, hundreds of which contribute
More informationSimulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands
Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands Powered By Powered by: USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Dr. David Loftis Powered By Powered by: Regen for Excel is a simulation model
More informationTHE STATUS OF BROMADIOLONE IN THE UNITED STATES
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Proceedings of the Twelfth Vertebrate Pest Conference (1986) Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings collection March 1986
More informationDraw disruptive, stabilizing, and directional selection on the board. Explain disruptive selection using an example. What effects speciation most?
Draw disruptive, stabilizing, and directional selection on the board. disruptive selection using an Disruptive selection is when the average physical characteristic of a population is not beneficial. Example:
More informationDrought, Tree Mortality, Insects and Diseases. Donald R. Owen California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Drought, Tree Mortality, Insects and Diseases Donald R. Owen California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Survival of Fire-Injured Conifers in California Donald R. Owen, 1 Daniel R. Cluck, 2 and
More informationOntario Envirothon LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Ontario Envirothon Learning Objectives
Ontario Envirothon LEARNING OBJECTIVES Updated Fall 2015 5 Contents Contents... 6 Overall Objectives... 7 Aquatic Ecology... 8 Specific Objectives... 8 Overall Objectives... 8 Application/Analysis... 9
More informationThe Westervelt Company 2017 SFI Fiber Sourcing Public Summary Audit Report
Introduction The Westervelt Company 2017 SFI Fiber Sourcing Public Summary Audit Report Printed: November 29, 2017 The SFI Program of The Westervelt Company of Tuscaloosa, AL has demonstrated conformance
More informationVERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT MATERIALS
VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT MATERIALS Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Test Methods for Vertebrate Pest Control and l\/lanagement Materials A symposium sponsored by ASTM Committee E-35
More informationSmall Mammal Response to Temporal Variations of Prescribed Fire in Blue Oak Woodlands
Mark Lynch Small Mammal Response to Temporal Variations of Prescribed Fire in Blue Oak Woodlands Introduction Fire is an integral component of terrestrial ecosystem processes. Naturally the intensity and
More informationECOLOGICAL CHANGE, FIRE HISTORY, AND CLIMATE: HOW LAND MANAGERS ARE USING PALEOECOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF ECOSYSTEMS
ECOLOGICAL CHANGE, FIRE HISTORY, AND CLIMATE: HOW LAND MANAGERS ARE USING PALEOECOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF ECOSYSTEMS Marlow Pellatt The Team Ze ev Gedalof Marian McCoy Shyanne Smith
More informationPRESCRIBED GRAZING (Ac.)
PA528 1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD PRESCRIBED GRAZING (Ac.) CODE 528 DEFINITION Managing the harvest of vegetation with grazing and/or browsing animals. PURPOSE
More informationForest Resources of the Ashley National Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Research Station December 1997 Forest Resources of the Ashley National Forest Renee A. O Brien Ronald P. Tymcio This summary of the
More informationManaging Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1
Managing Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1 Why? Primarily Food. Acorns 142 calories/ounce. 9 grams of fat. 15 grams carbohydrate 2 grams protein Wildlife SuperFood Acorns can compose more than 75 percent
More informationManaging for a healthy sugarbush in a changing climate
Managing for a healthy sugarbush in a changing climate Vermont Maple Conference, Peoples Academy, Morrisville, VT January 28, 2017 Jared Nunery & Nancy Patch County Foresters Vermont Dept. of Forests,
More information