BEYOND COMPOSTING Alternative Technologies for Processing Source Separated Organics

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "BEYOND COMPOSTING Alternative Technologies for Processing Source Separated Organics"

Annis Matthews
5 years ago
Views:

1 BEYOND COMPOSTING Alternative Technologies for Processing Source Separated Organics Kate Vasquez, Sr. Consultant Ljupka Arsova, Consultant II Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. Introductions Organics in the U.S. Organics Management Technology Review Conclusions & Recommendations 2 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 1

2 The GBB team Quality Value Ethics Results 3 GBB Overview Established in 1980 Solid Waste Management and Technology Consultants Helping Clients Turn Problems into Opportunities 4 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 2

3 GBB Waste Technology Services Economic, technical and environmental reviews Waste characterization and sourcing Process planning and design Independent feasibility consultant Procurements Due diligence Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 3

4 Ljupka Arsova GBB Consultant II On the phone 7 Organics in the U.S. Why communities pursue organics 8 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 4

Historical Generation & Management of MSW 1970 2009 Source: US EPA, Municipal Solid Waste in the United

Biocycle Estimate: 389 million tons (2008) Combustion with Energy Recovery 11.

5 Historical Generation & Management of MSW Source: US EPA, Municipal Solid Waste in the United States, 2009 Facts and Figures 9 Disposition of MSW in the U.S. EPA Estimate: 250 million tons (2010) Biocycle Estimate: 389 million tons (2008) Combustion with Energy Recovery 11.70% Combustion with Energy Recovery 6.70% Recovered 24.10% Recovery 34.00% Discarded 54.30% Discarded 69.30% 10 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 5

4% Yard Trimmings 13% Paper & Paperboard 29% Food Scraps 14% Other Glass 4%

6 Composition of MSW in the U.S. Total MSW generation before recycling MSW going to landfills after recycling Wood 6% Rubber, Leather & Textiles 8% Metals 9% Plastics 12% Glass 5% Other 4% Yard Trimmings 13% Paper & Paperboard 29% Food Scraps 14% Other Glass 4% 5% Paper & Paperboard Wood, 8% 16% Textiles, 4% Rubber & Leather 17% Metals 9% Plastics, 17% Food Scraps 21% Yard Trimmings 9% 2010 EPA data 11 EPA Waste Hierarchies 12 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 6

7 Management Practices Today we re focusing on source separated organics 13 Who has curbside collection of food waste? Latest data from BioCycle Magazine, March communities offer curbside collection of residential food waste 18 states 2.55 million households 726,250 tons in 2012* 14 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 7

California and Washington and Minnesota and Oregon The majority of residential programs are located on the West Coast, where food waste has been added to existing yard trimmings programs.

8 California and Washington and Minnesota and Oregon The majority of residential programs are located on the West Coast, where food waste has been added to existing yard trimmings programs. 15 Factors driving food waste separation CA: diversion efforts continue WA: entrenched cultural value OR: service is increasingly widespread MN: driven by Twin Cities & PAYT New England: disposal pressures continue 16 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 8

9 Going for it: Portland, OR 17 Can we just ramp up composting? Adding food waste is a challenge Needs about 1 acre per 3000 CY of yard waste (~13,200 tons) Slower throughput Biogas and energy recovery 18 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 9

10 Almost 600 Companies Most of the companies offering this technology have no experience in the US. Source: Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc., April Technology review Existing and emerging technologies 20 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 10

Aerobic Composting Biological decomposition of organic waste under well aerated conditions Compost / soil amendment is the resulting product Great for yard and green waste Cannot be done on 100% food

BioCycle, April 2013 21 Anaerobic Digestion Biological degradation of organic material in absence of oxygen Results are biogas and digestate: Biogas is used as fuel for electricity and/or heat

11 Aerobic Composting Biological decomposition of organic waste under well aerated conditions Compost / soil amendment is the resulting product Great for yard and green waste Cannot be done on 100% food waste There are nearly 2,300 composting facilities in United States. About 50 are taking some quantity of food waste. BioCycle, April Anaerobic Digestion Biological degradation of organic material in absence of oxygen Results are biogas and digestate: Biogas is used as fuel for electricity and/or heat production. It can be conditioned to pipeline quality Digestate can be used as a soil amendment, animal bedding, or rolled into a composting process There are 13 AD plants accepting food waste in the U.S., including demonstration, pilot and commercial projects. Renewable Waste Intelligence, March Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 11

12 Anaerobic Digestion on the Waste Management Hierarchy Expanded hierarchy of Waste Management by Prof. N. J. Themelis (2008) 23 AD plants in the US and types of feedstock they process 1500 digesters at Wastewater Treatment Plants (250 use the biogas) 192 farm digesters 13 pilot, demonstration and commercial plants processing commercial food waste 24 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 12

Types of Feedstock Requires pre-sorting, even

Source separated organic (SSO) waste from

commercial generators such as restaurants,

By-products and refuse material from food

13 Types of Feedstock Requires pre-sorting, even if it takes mixed MSW. Source separated organic (SSO) waste from households and institutions SSO waste from commercial generators such as restaurants, cafeterias, fresh markets and supermarkets. By-products and refuse material from food processing industry 25 Companies at work 26 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 13

Anaerobic Digestion Facility Examples Cleveland, OH-

Monterey, CA- Zero Waste Energy 27 Gasification

Product: Syngas for production of electricity

medical waste, demonstration-scale MSW Plasma

14 Anaerobic Digestion Facility Examples Cleveland, OH- Quasar Energy Toronto, Canada- CCI Bioenergy Monterey, CA- Zero Waste Energy 27 Gasification Partial combustion in an air-controlled environment Product: Syngas for production of electricity chemicals/ fuels (ethanol) Feedstocks: biomass, medical waste, demonstration-scale MSW Plasma gasification: a plasma arc is used as a heat source 28 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 14

15 Pyrolysis? Thermal conversion in the absence of oxygen Non-recyclable plastics to oil 29 Technologies and Risk Alternative Risks/Liability Risk Summary Anaerobic Digestion Pyrolysis Gasification Chemical Decomposition Proven technology; limited U.S. commercial experience Previous failures at scale, uncertain commercial potential; no operating experience with large scale operations Limited operating experience at only small scale; subject to scale up issues Technology under development; not a commercial option at this time Moderate to Low High High High Source: GBB, March Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 15

Conclusions and recommendations The marketplace and your place in it 31 Conclusions Food scraps are the low-hanging fruit toward increasing recycling/diversion Anaerobic digestion is the

16 Conclusions and recommendations The marketplace and your place in it 31 Conclusions Food scraps are the low-hanging fruit toward increasing recycling/diversion Anaerobic digestion is the environmentallysound option for material and energy recovery from organic waste The food processing industry, institutional and commercial sources have great quality feedstock for AD 32 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 16

procurement process Get as much help as you can afford 33 Costs for an additional route Consumer

17 Recommendations Educate yourselves on the challenges of implementing a food waste management system: Consumer challenges Collection and transportation challenges Technology challenges Conduct a solid procurement process Get as much help as you can afford 33 Costs for an additional route Consumer Challenges Reluctance to store food waste Inconvenience of another waste stream 34 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 17

Dirty and messy Heavy and dense waste stream

18 Dirty and messy Heavy and dense waste stream Collection and Transportation Challenges Plastic bags Biodegradable bags 35 Clean feedstock Economics Operational Challenges Specific feedstocks Quality and markets Siting and permitting 36 Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 18

Before you begin evaluating a company, you need to know: What is their experience? What is the technology? How does it work? What can it process? What does it produce? 37 Thank you!

19 Before you begin evaluating a company, you need to know: What is their experience? What is the technology? How does it work? What can it process? What does it produce? 37 Thank you!! Questions and comments? Kate Vasquez Senior Consultant kvasquez@gbbinc.com Ljupka Arsova Consultant II larsova@gbbinc.com Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. 19

Status of Managing the Organic Waste in the U.S.: The 2013 Columbia Survey and Beyond Ljupka Arsova Consultant II Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc.

Status of Managing the Organic Waste in the U.S.: The 2013 Columbia Survey and Beyond Ljupka Arsova Consultant II Gershman, Brickner & Bratton, Inc. Presented at the WTERT Bi-Annual Meeting October 9,