DI-MGMT-XXXXX (Technical Data DID) April 13, 2017
|
|
- Clinton Gardner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DRAFT DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION DRAFT Title: Technical Data Report (DRAFT) Number: DI-MGMT-XXXXX Approval Date: DRAFT AMSC Number: XXXX Limitation: DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Preparing Activity: CAPE Project Number: FNCL Introduction: The Technical Data Report is the Department of Defense (DoD) system for collecting technical parameter data as part of the Cost, Software, and Technical Data Reporting (CSTDR) requirement. The resulting data repository serves as the primary source for contract cost, software, and technical data for many DoD resource analysis efforts; including cost database development, applied cost estimating, cost research, program reviews, Analysis of Alternatives (AoA), and life cycle cost estimates. The Technical Data Report provides context to cost data to derive cost estimating relationships. The Technical Data Report may be used in response to government solicitations according to Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations Supplement (DFARS) sections , , , , and Office of the Secretary of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (OSD CAPE) and Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Performance Assessments and Root Cause Analyses (AT&L PARCA) have jointly defined the CSTDR/EVM Co-Plan template and process, for use on contracts that meet both the CSTDR and Earned Value Management (EVM) reporting thresholds. The Co-Plan will leverage the consistent Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) and Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) reporting structures against the MIL-STD-881C appendices. All reporting under this DID shall be in accordance with the Cost & Software Data Reporting (CSDR)/Earned Value Management (EVM) Co-Plan (Form 2794); hereafter referenced as the Co-Plan Use/Relationship: For background and detailed requirements related to Cost, Software, and Technical Data Reporting (CSTDR), refer to DoD M-1 (or latest version), Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Manual The Technical Data Report Data Item Description (DID) is structured around the four data groups below, that contain the content and relationships required for the electronic submission: Technical Data Format Data Group Report Metadata Government Furnished Information (Co-Plan) Technical Data Parameters Technical Data WBS Mapping ID A B C D A. Data Group A Report Metadata: Provides metadata on the contract that allows the submitted data to be associated with other Data Groups and program data. Page 1
2 B. Data Group B Government Furnished Information (Co-Plan): Documents WBS reporting elements and any additional data tags as reported by the CSTDR/EVM Co-Plan. C. Data Group C Technical Data Parameters: Used to collect information related to each required item type, the technical parameter value, unit of measure, estimate/actual, margin, and comments. D. Data Group D Technical Data WBS Mapping: Used to map the technical parameter values to the WBS element and end-order codes, as required by the Co-Plan The Technical Data DID is structured around a format that contains the content and relationships required for the electronic submissions. This Data Item Description (DID) summarizes the Technical Data Report and provides instructions to complement the data requirements specified in the contract for CSTDR reporting. The primary purpose of the data is as follows: Technical Data Report data will be used by DoD Component staff, including program managers, systems engineers, cost estimators, logisticians and financial management personnel to: (1) review and evaluate the program technical baseline; (2) describe the technical parameters required to develop a program life cycle cost estimate; and (3) collect technical and programmatic information in support of system trade off analysis and cost analysis activities. It is important that the data be as accurate as possible so that they may be used for their intended purposes This DID summarizes the forms and provides instructions to support the data and frequency requirements specified in the contract for CSTDR technical reporting. The Technical Data Report is related to other program acquisition requirements, including the FlexFile (DI- FNCL-TBD), Quantity Data Report (DI-MGMT-TBD) and SRDR Development/Maintenance (DI-MGMT-82035) Reporting is required throughout the complete life cycle to include the Operating and Support (O&S) phase of the program. Contract reporting is required throughout the life of the contract. Software sustainment activities are captured using the separate SRDR, Software Maintenance and Data Dictionary DID (DI-MGMT-82035) Requirements: 3.1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, will be as cited in ASSIST at the time of the solicitation; or, for non-assist documents, as stated herein References DoD Instruction , Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, (current version). This instruction contains mandatory CSTDR requirements DoDI , Cost Analysis Guidance and Procedures, (current version) DoD M-1, Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Manual, (current version) Operating and Support Cost-Estimating Guide MIL-STD-881C, Work Breakdown Structure for Defense Materiel Items, (current version). Page 2
3 DD Form 2794, Cost, Software, Technical Data Reporting Plan, (current version), available at Commonly referred to as the CSTDR Plan, a completed DD Form 2794 must be approved by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) Deputy Director, Cost Assessment (DDCA) Technical Data Exchange Instructions (DEI), currently being documented Technical Data File Format Specifications (FFS), currently being documented Format. Provide Data Groups A through D using the electronic preparation instructions below. Data must be reported for each Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Element for which an X is marked in Block 13c. iii from the approved contract or subcontract CSDR/EVM Co-Plan. Omit the other WBS Elements The Data Groups A through D of the Technical Data Report, must be submitted electronically in accordance with a CAPE-approved Technical Data DEI/FFS. The specific definition of the Technical Data DEI/FFS are provided under separate covers, (Reference and above). Electronic submittals shall be delivered to the OSD CAPE Defense Cost Resource Center s (DCARC s) secure web-site using the Cost Assessment Data Enterprise (CADE) CSDR Submit-Review (CSDR-SR) system Uploading data to the DCARC requires use of either a DoD Common Access Card (CAC) or a DoD-approved External Certification Authority (ECA) certificate. See for portal registration instructions Implementation. Contractors are responsible for implementing requirements on all subcontracts that meet the reporting thresholds (see DoD Instruction , Table 7.) 4.0. Preparation Instructions: 4.1. General Instructions. All reporting under this Technical Data DID will be in accordance with the CSTDR/EVM Contract or Sub-contract Co-Plan (Form 2794) process Mark the security classification of each report as Unclassified in the space provided on the upper left and lower right of the Form. However, if the report is classified, contact the DCARC for special processing instructions. Please note: Proprietary is not an official DoD security classification, and documents should not be marked as such. If the use of a proprietary disclosure statement is required, it should be inserted in the document s footer The 1921-T reporting frequency is referenced in Block 25 (Submission Events) of the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan. When a corresponding FlexFile, Quantity, or Software Report is required, the Technical Data Report should align by the as of date, as referenced in the approved plan Contractors must report all technical data associated with the contract, including Advance Procurement, Long Lead Materials, Multiyear Procurement, Inter-Division or Inter-Company Work Orders (IWOs), Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Warranty, etc. Technical data should not be omitted based on contract Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) structure or definition. If IWO costs exceed $50M, separate reporting will be required for technical data Specific Instructions: 5.1. Data Group A - Metadata: Page 3
4 The following data elements must be reported: Program Name: Enter the name given to the program as identified on Page 1 (Summary), Item 1a (Program Name) from the approved contract or subcontract Co- Plan Phase/Milestone: Enter one of the following for the appropriate Phase/Milestone which is being reported: 1. Pre-A (Material Solution Analysis Phase), 2. A (Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Phase), 3. B (Engineering and Manufacturing Development Phase), 4. C-LRIP (Low-Rate Initial Production), 5. C-FRP (Full-Rate Production), or 6. O&S (Operations and Support Phase) Prime Mission Product: Enter the most current official military designation for the end item as specified by the appropriate classification standard (e.g., DoD L, Military Designation of Military Aerospace Vehicles, would specify F-35 for the Joint Strike Fighter). For contract (or subcontract) Co-Plans, the end item being reported may have a different designation than the total program (e.g., the preparer would enter AN/APG-81 Radar for the F-35 Radar contract Co-Plan). If the end item does not have a military designation, enter the type of product being developed or procured, for example, radar Reporting Organization Type: Enter one of the following for the appropriate organization type: 1. Prime/Associate Contractor, 2. Direct-Reporting Subcontractor, or 3. Government Performing Organization: Enter the following information for the organization actually performing the work: Organization Name: Enter the name of the organization Division Name: Enter the name of the division of the organization performing the work, if applicable Cage Code: Enter the five-character ID number assigned to the organization performing the work, if applicable. If there are multiple Cage Codes, report all separated by commas Address: Enter the location of the organization, or the division of the organization, if applicable. Include the following information: Street Address City State Zip Code Page 4
5 Approved Plan Number: Enter the Approved Plan Number of the current approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan that authorized the collection of data for this report Customer (Direct-Reporting Subcontractor Use Only): Enter the name of the prime contractor for whom the work on the subcontract is being performed. Otherwise enter NA (for not applicable ) Contract Price: Enter the total contract price applicable to the data reported: If the data are in response to a solicitation in accordance with DFARS sections , , and , enter the total estimated price. If the data being reported is for a lot, delivery order, or task, enter the price for the work being reported, not the total contract price Contract Number: Enter the assigned prime contract number the prime contractor has with the Government customer. This requirement is identical for both reporting contractors and reporting subcontractors Solicitation Number: 1. If the data are in response to a solicitation in accordance with DFARS sections , , and , enter the solicitation number. 2. Otherwise enter NA (for not applicable ) Period of Performance: Enter the dates for the data being reported (contract, lot, delivery order, or task). Enter the appropriate numeric data for the year, month, and day. For example, July 31, 2004, would be shown as Start Date: The actual start date End Date: The actual end date Report Type: Enter one of the following: 1. Initial, 2. Interim, or 3. Final Submission Event: Enter the following information for the report submission: Number: Enter the submission number for the report provided Name: Enter the submission event for the report provided. This must match Item 30c of the current approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan Type: Enter one of the following: 1. Initial, 2. Change Report As Of: Enter the appropriate numeric data for the year, month, and last day of the reporting period. For example, July 31, 2004, would be shown as : For event driven submissions, the Report As Of date should be consistent with the event in Item 30c of the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan. If an event date changes due to a programmatic schedule slip, adjustment to the Page 5
6 As of Date reported in Item 30d of the Co-Plan must be requested through the CSDR Submit-Review system for DCARC approval by the Government Program Office prior to the date reflected in the Co-Plan. A date change request does not require an official Co-Plan revision Point of Contact: Information for the person to contact for answers to any questions about entries on the submission: Name (Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial) Department Telephone Number (including Area Code) Address Date Prepared: Enter the appropriate numeric data for the year, month, and day of the date the report was prepared in the appropriate numeric format. For example, July 31, 2004, would be shown as Order Name: The Order Name as identified in the Co-Plan which results from the contract negotiations of new scope Data Group B Government Furnished Information (Co-Plan): Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Element Code: The WBS element code reflective of the Co-Plan WBS element code for each reporting WBS element. The WBS Element Code shall be the same as Block 11b of the Co-Plan WBS Element Level: The WBS level consistent with the WBS Element Code for each reporting WBS Element. The WBS Element Level shall be the same as Block 11c of the Co-Plan WBS Element Name: The WBS element name reflective of the Co-Plan WBS element name for each reporting WBS element. The WBS Element Name shall be the same as Block 12 of the Co-Plan. There will be no space indentations before the WBS Element Name representing indenture of the WBS Element Level Order Name: The Order Name as identified in the Co-Plan which results from contract negotiations of new scope. When appropriate, the Order Name will have sequence or fiscal year buy information associated with it. The Order Name shall be the same as Block 17b of the Co-Plan. The tag that identifies technical data with each Order Name will be the same as the End-Order Code, defined in of Data Group B below. The End-Order Code will discretely map to one Order Name. Examples include Technology Development (TD), Engineering and Manufacturing Design (EMD), Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) #3, Full Rate Production (FRP) #5, and Operations and Support (O&S) FY17. Examples of Order Names on the same contract Co-Plan include Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3, etc., or, Construction Preparation, Detailed Design & Construction, etc. Page 6
7 End Item: Uniquely identify a Platform, Model, Version, Flight, Variant, Kits or equivalent grouping or variant of a reported unit or system. The End Items shall be the same as Block 18 of the Co-Plan. There will always be at least one End Item on a technical data submission, which may be the same as the Program Name reported in Block 1a of the Co-Plan. Instead of placing each variant into the WBS, the common WBS provided in Co-Plan Blocks 11 and 12 will be reported against with an additional tag that identifies End Item. The tag that identifies technical data with each End Item will be the same as the End-Order Code, defined in of Data Group B below. The End-Order Code will discretely map to one End Item. For example, a family of vehicles may have unique End Items for each variant bought, such as Cargo, Van, Tractor, Wrecker, Dump Truck, and Load Handling. Common material or software costs that span across End Items, if applicable, may also be given their own unique End Item End-Order Code: The End-Order Code is a unique string of five characters provided in Block 19b of the Co-Plan. The End-Order Code identifies the how technical data are segregated across Order Name(s) (Block 17b of the Co-Plan), and further, how technical data within an Order Name are segregated across End Items (Block 18 of the Co-Plan). Technical data will be reported to each and every End-Order Code, representing the unique combination of each and every Order Name along with each and every End Item, as determined in the Co-Plan. The End-Order Code is the tag that relates the technical parameter data to the model/variant with associated cost/hour and quantity information reported through the FlexFile (DI-FNCL-TBD) and Quantity Data (DI-MGMT-TBD), respectively. For example, if there are three Order Names (e.g., Lot 1, Lot 2, and Lot 3 ) and two End Items (e.g., Variant A and Variant B ), then technical data will be reported against six Sub-Order Codes (e.g., A1001, B1002, A1002, etc., representing Lot 1 Variant A, Lot 1 Variant B, Lot 2 Variant A, etc.). If the reporting entity begins charging to new scope before the Co-Plan is amended with updates to Order Name and/or End Item, or the reporting entity would like to logically separate a new Order Name or End Item that is not provided by the Co- Plan, the contractor may create a new End-Order Code so long as the relevant Order Name and End Item names are also identified with the intention of updating the Co-Plan Blocks 17, 18, and 19 to reflect the new tags Data Group C Technical Data Parameters Refer to Page 4 (Technical Parameter Requirements) of the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan for the required WBS Element Codes and Names; Technical Parameter Item Type, Name, Unit of Measure, Unit of Measure Qualifier, Repeatable instructions; and any CWIPT required remarks. Definitions for each parameter are provided on the CADE website, The following data elements must be reported: Page 7
8 Mapping ID: By hardware item, a unique identifier by Item Type for each individual group of parameters. Created by the reporting contractor, the Mapping ID is any unique alpha-numeric code that is used to differentiate between individual parts. This is used to match the technical parameters to the End Item ID and corresponding WBS element code in the Technical Data WBS Mapping ID table, Data Group D (Mapping ID) of the Technical Data Report. If there is only one identified End-Order Code, the reporting contractor may use the WBS element code as the Mapping ID Item Type: The Item Type for each required WBS element, referencing Page 4, Item 23 (Item Type) from the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan. The Item Type is required for management of the Technical Parameter database and will always be defined for the reporting contractor as part of the Co-Plan Technical Parameter Name: The Technical Parameter Name as presented in Page 4, Item 24a (Parameter Name) from the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan Group Key: The Group Key indicator is used to keep like-rows together. This is necessary when a WBS element has repeated subsets of the same parameters. Reference Page 4, Item 24d (Repeatable) from the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan for specific instructions required for the repeating of parameters associated with the WBS Element and Item Type. For example, if an electronic box has multiple cards that perform different functions, the technical parameters will need to be repeated for each unique card. The Group Key is used to ensure these parameters are grouped together in the CADE database. Any unique alpha-numeric content will meet the IT-need to keep records grouped, but even-so, reasonable meaningful keys are recommended. These keys exist solely in the context of a single submission Value: A single value, excluding margin, for the associated Technical Parameter and hardware item identified by the Mapping ID. The value can be considered Estimated or Actual. The Type (numeric, text, multiple choice from list, etc.) of entry and the Unit of Measure (watts, percent, kilos, etc.) are defined by the parameter being requested. Parameters and their associated definition, allowable value, Unit of Measure, etc. will be specified in the approved Co-Plan language or by other means. (Note: Each parameter definition has instructions for the Item Type entry and the additional data type information elements specified below) Unit of Measure: The Unit of Measure as presented in Page 4, Item 24b (Unit of Measure) from the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan. Requirements and guidance for the Unit of Measure entry are specific to each Parameter (or grouping of Parameters) and are provided with each Parameter definition Unit of Measure Qualifier: The Unit of Measure Qualifier name as presented in Page 4, Item 24c (Unit of Measure Qualifier) from the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan. Requirements and guidance for the Unit of Measure Qualifier entry are specific to each Parameter (or grouping of Parameters) and are provided with each Parameter definition. For example, if the area of a Solar Array is required, the Unit of Measure might be square feet. The Unit of Measure Qualifier might be Per Panel if multiple array panels are specified or could be Total if the square footage Page 8
9 is specified for the entire set of panel or entire array(s) Estimate/Actual: For each parameter value, enter Estimate or Actual, for the most representative valuation of the pedigree or derivation of the technical parameter values reported: Estimate the threshold, spec value for any given parameter. Enter Estimate if the parameter value applies to the following definitions: o o o Specified - It is likely that the reported value will deviate somewhat from the current prediction. A specified value might represent a mostlikely estimate derived or taken from a specification expressed as a single value (Objective), or from an expressed pair (Objective and Threshold). It can also be an approximation based on historical experience, Subject Matter Expert (SME) experience, rough sketches, or conceptual analysis. Predicted - There is a realistic likelihood that the reported value specified will remain unchanged from the current prediction. Expected value from a design (e.g. pre-release or released drawings) expressed as a single value (e.g. Most Likely, or a Point Estimate with no statement of likelihood). Spec- There is a good likelihood that the reported value will not deviate or only slightly vary from the current valuation. Expected value may come from (or be extrapolated from) an actual measurement of a developmental or production representative unit or from an un-verified specification or catalog. Actual the measured, known value for any given parameter. Enter Actual if the parameter value applies to the following definition: o Known - The reported value will not deviate as it is a final measurement or valuation. Demonstrated (e.g. measured) value from completed production or operating unit, assembly, or other product being used or delivered and reported Margin: The estimated or measured margin for the associated Technical Parameter specified by the Mapping ID. The margin value should be reported for any hardware item with a reported technical parameter which is an Estimated value, and considered for Actual technical parameters which exhibit significant margin in their measured values Comments: Enter any information that would explain any peculiarities or ambiguities in any of the data reported in Data Group C. Reference Page 4, Item 24e (Comments) from the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan, and enter any required information dictated by the CWIPT. Enter explanations of changes from previous submissions (e.g. error corrections or substantive changes in underlying equipment or products.) Include any basis for, or calculations, used to derive any of the element responses Data Group D - Technical Data WBS Mapping ID: The following data elements must be reported: WBS Element Code: The WBS Element Code for each WBS element being reported. The code must be identical as presented in Block 11b (WBS Element Page 9
10 Code) from the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan End-Order Code (1-n): The Mapping ID from Data Group C (Technical Data Parameters), enter the Mapping ID for Item Types which uniquely identify the corresponding End-Order Code (Model, Version, Flight, Variant, or equivalent grouping or variant of a reported unit or system). Allowable entries for this element and their scope will be specified in from the approved contract or subcontract Co-Plan. Each item must be reported in a single column, expanded to the right (End-Order Code 1 n). End-Order Code is further defined in END OF DI-MGMT-XXXXX Page 10
DI-FNCL-XXXXX (Quantity & Technical Data DID) September 2, 2016
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Contractor Quantity & Technical Data Reports (DD Forms 1921-Q, 1921-T) Number: DI-FNCL-XXXXX Approval Date: DRAFT AMSC Number: XXXX Limitation: DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable:
More informationDI-FNCL-XXXXX (Technical Data DID) July 11, 2016
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Contractor Technical, Quantity, and Repair Part Data Report (DD Forms 1921-Q, 1921-T, 1921-R) Number: DI-FNCL-XXXXX Approval Date: DRAFT AMSC Number: XXXX Limitation: DTIC
More informationTHE DD 2794 COST & SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN GUIDE FOR COMPLETION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE COST ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION
THE DD 2794 COST & SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN GUIDE FOR COMPLETION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE COST ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION FEBRUARY 2019 DD 2794 COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING (CSDR)
More informationCost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Post Award Meeting Procedures
Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Post Award Meeting Procedures Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC) 11/14/2018 This document provides an overview of the CSDR Post Award Meeting procedures. Table
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Functional Cost-Hour Report (DD Form 1921-1) Number: DI-FNCL-81566C Approval Date: 20110518 AMSC Number: D9194 Limitation: DTIC Applicable: GIDEP Applicable: Preparing Activity:
More informationTraveling the Path of DCARC, CSDR, and the Agile ERP SRDR
ICEAA 2018 Traveling the Path of DCARC, CSDR, and the Agile ERP SRDR JAMES I, IPPS-A COST MANAGEMENT BRANCH CHIEF R. KIM CLARK, DIRECTOR, GALORATH FEDERAL DCARC Defense Cost and Resource Center Primary
More informationTitle: Software Resources Data Reporting: Development, Maintenance and Enterprise Resource Planning Development Reports, and Data Dictionary
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Software Resources Data Reporting: Development, Maintenance and Enterprise Resource Planning Development Reports, and Data Dictionary Number: DI-MGMT-82035A Approval Date:
More informationThe DCARC UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. DCARC Helpdesk Jen Horner (253) x1. Software and Web Development
The DCARC Dr. Richard Burke Deputy Director of Cost Assessment Mr. Michael W. Augustus DCARC Director CSDR Operations Jim Manzo (571) 372-4266 Linnay Franklin (571)372-4269 IT Support John McGahan (253)564-1979
More informationCSDR Reporting UNCLASSIFIED. As determined by CSDR plan UNCLASSIFIED. Creation of WBS structure. Resource Distribution Table.
CSDR Reporting CWIPT Formation Creation of WBS structure Resource Distribution Table CSDR Plan Development Contracting CSDR Reporting CSDR Validation Compliance Ratings As determined by CSDR plan 116 CCDR
More informationDefense Cost & Resource Center (DCARC) Executive Overview Brief
Defense Cost & Resource Center (DCARC) Executive Overview Brief March 2011 Agenda Introduction Mission & Function Organizational Structure Infrastructure Key Products and Services Efficiency Innovations
More informationIUID Education and Training Series. IUID Contracting. IUID Center Representative NSWC Corona, IUID Center 2 August 2016
IUID Education and Training Series IUID Contracting IUID Center Representative NSWC Corona, IUID Center 2 August 2016 1 Housekeeping Please mute your telephone Please use the chat box for questions which
More informationCADE. Cost Assessment Data Enterprise Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC)
CADE Cost Assessment Data Enterprise Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC) Cost and Software Data Reports (CSDRs) Industry and Government Training Washington, DC Last Updated: December 2, 2015 Cost
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Software Resources Data Reporting: Final Developer Report and Data Dictionary Number: DI-MGMT-81740A Approval Date: 20110518 AMSC Number: D9197 Limitation: DTIC Number: GIDEP
More informationSupporting OSD Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC)
Sustainment Cost Reporting Sandi Enser Technomics Sustainment Subject Matter Expert Supporting OSD Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC) June 8, 2017 More than 60 percent of Navy and Marine Corps strike
More informationFOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY!
COMPANY (Bus. Area, Facility or Unit) Unique Identification (UID) And Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Implementation Approach Dated February 17, 2005 FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY! TABLE OF CONTENTS.
More informationDETAIL SPECIFICATION MANUALS, TECHNICAL - SAMPLE BASIC WEIGHT CHECKLISTS AND LOADING DATA
NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE 15 May 2015 SUPERSEDING MIL-DTL-5920G 1 October 2010 DETAIL SPECIFICATION MANUALS, TECHNICAL - SAMPLE BASIC WEIGHT CHECKLISTS AND LOADING DATA Comments, suggestions, or questions
More informationRequest for Solutions: High Energy Laser (HEL) Flexible Prototype. 11 December 2018
Request for Solutions: High Energy Laser (HEL) Flexible Prototype 11 December 2018 1.0 Purpose The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) seeks a prototype groundbased Laser Weapon System (LWS)
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: DD Form 1921-1 Functional Cost-Hour and Progress Curve Report Number: DI-FNCL-81566A Approval Date: 20031031 AMSC Number: D7516 DTIC Applicable: Preparing Activity: (D) OSD/PA&E/CAIG
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROGRAM PLAN Number: Approval Date: 20070404 AMSC Number: N7716 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility:
More informationSection M: Evaluation Factors for Award HQ R LRDR Section M: Evaluation Factors for Award For HQ R-0002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 LRDR Section M: Evaluation Factors for Award For 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Table of
More informationCOST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE. CSDR Submit-Review Website: Reviewer Guide
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE CSDR Submit-Review Website: Reviewer Guide Training Agenda By the end of this training you will understand how to: Log in to the Submit-Review Application Review and comment
More informationCOST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE. FlexFiles
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE FlexFiles FlexFiles Agenda This brief is a success if it demonstrates the Evolution of the FlexFile Benefits of the FlexFile Features of the FlexFile Process of the FlexFile
More informationReferences to Agency Specific Regulations. All References to FAR shall mean Federal Acquisition Regulation.
In all such clauses, unless the context of the clause requires otherwise, the term "Contractor" shall mean Seller, the term "Contract" shall mean this Order, and the terms "Government," "Contracting Officer"
More informationNumber: DI-HFAC-81743A Approval Date: Office of Primary Responsibility: AS/AIR 4.6 Applicable Forms: N/A
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROGRAM PLAN Number: Approval Date: 20110421 AMSC Number: N9190 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility:
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Software Resources Data Reporting: Initial Developer Report and Data Dictionary Number: DI-MGMT-81739 Approval Date: 20070420 AMSC Number: D7724 DTIC Number: Limitation: Office
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION TITLE: The 50/50 Requirements Report NUMBER: APPROVAL DATE: 20070912 AMSC NUMBER: F9002 LIMITATION: N/A DTIC APPLICABLE: N/A GIDEP APPLICABLE: N/A PREPARING ACTIVITY: 10 (ASC/YFPC)
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE
NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE MIL-STD-881D 9 April 2018 SUPERSEDING MIL-STD-881C 3 October 2011 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURES FOR DEFENSE MATERIEL ITEMS AMSC 9915 AREA MISC
More informationLunch n Learn 04 APR 18 CADE Mission & Major Initiatives
Lunch n Learn 04 APR 18 CADE Mission & Major Initiatives Session will start at 1230 EDT (1130 CDT). Audio will be through DCS there will be a sound check 30 minutes prior to the session. Everyone but the
More informationThe Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)
Page 1 of 10 The Integrated Baseline (IBR) The IBR management review is concerned more with the technical planning aspects and understanding how a contractor manages a project than past reviews that focused
More informationJSCC. Joint Space Cost Council. Executive Briefing. Joint Space Cost Council. September 2016
Executive Briefing September 2016 Background Cost estimating issues raised at AIA Executive Space Industry Roundtable Nov 05 No clear interface points/opportunities for dialogue between industry and government
More information01/16/2019 Ellen Barber Lunch n Learn Integrated Baseline Review
01/16/2019 Ellen Barber ellen.barber@dau.mil Lunch n Learn Integrated Baseline Review Agenda Who are we? BLUF: What is an Integrated Baseline Review IBR Objectives Who must do an IBR? Current guidance
More informationAgile Software Development Cost Modeling for the US DoD
Agile Software Development Cost Modeling for the US DoD Wilson Rosa, Naval Center for Cost Analysis Ray Madachy, Naval Postgraduate School Bradford Clark, Software Metrics, Inc. Barry Boehm, University
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE
NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE MIL-STD-881C 3 October 2011 SUPERSEDING MIL-HDBK-881A 30 July 2005 MIL-STD-881B 25 March 1993 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURES FOR DEFENSE MATERIEL
More informationInstructions For Populating GFP Attachments
Instructions For Populating GFP Attachments August 2014 The two attachments for GFP serve multiple purposes in the contract. They document the agreement between the Government and the contractor on what
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION TITLE: TRAINING SITUATION DOCUMENT Number: DI-SESS-81517C Approval Date:
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION TITLE: TRAINING SITUATION DOCUMENT Number: DI-SESS-81517C Approval Date: 20130524 AMSC Number: N9379 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility:
More information1.0 BASIS OF ESTIMATE (BOE) HOW TO
1.0 BASIS OF ESTIMATE (BOE) HOW TO 1.1 Definition A Basis of Estimate (BOE) is a document that identifies the logic, data, methodology and calculations used to estimate the resources required to perform
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Request for Nomenclature (DD Form 61)
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Request for Nomenclature (DD Form 61) Number: Approval Date: August 27, 2012 AMSC Number: A9276 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary
More informationMORS Introduction to Cost Estimation (Part I)
MORS Introduction to Cost Estimation (Part I) Mr. Huu M. Hoang Slide 1 Disclosure Form Slide 2 Learning Objectives of Module Two 1. Understand how to define a program using the various documents and other
More informationDoD PARCA EVM. EVM Policy Initiatives. Mr. John McGregor PARCA Director for EVM. NDIA IPMD April 27, 2017
1 NDIA IPMD April 27, 2017 DoD PARCA EVM EVM Policy Initiatives Mr. John McGregor PARCA Director for EVM A Few Words 2 3 1. EVM-CR Industry Role 2. DoDI 5000.02 3. IPMR 4. EVMSIG 5. MIL-STD-881C OUSD AT&L
More informationDepartment of the Navy. Earned Value Management Implementation Guide. Published by THE NAVAL CENTER FOR EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT
Department of the Navy Earned Value Management Implementation Guide Published by THE NAVAL CENTER FOR EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT FIGURE 1: EVM GUIDANCE ROADMAP 1 1 Please note that links to all cited documents
More informationEarned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective
Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective Van Kinney Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition & Technology) REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
More informationSelected Acquisition Report (SAR)
Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-474 F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization (F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod) As of FY 2016 President's Budget Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR)
More informationPARCA. DoD EVM Policy Initiatives. Mr. John McGregor PARCA Deputy Director for EVM. NDIA IPMD Meeting May 3, 2018
NDIA IPMD Meeting May 3, 2018 PARCA DoD EVM Policy Initiatives Mr. John McGregor PARCA Deputy Director for EVM 1 PARCA Recent Publications Ongoing Initiatives Questions 2 Director, Performance Assessments
More informationCost Estimating Documentation Guide
Cost Estimating Documentation Guide Prepared by Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Cost & Economics) Naval Center for Cost Analysis Purpose: Provide Naval Center for Cost Analysis (NCCA) policy on
More informationDETAIL SPECIFICATION PIPE, ALUMINUM ALLOY, DRAWN OR EXTRUDED
INCH-POUND MIL-DTL-299E September 2014 SUPERSEDING MIL-DTL-299D 14 May 2007 DETAIL SPECIFICATION PIPE, ALUMINUM ALLOY, DRAWN OR EXTRUDED 1. SCOPE This specification is approved for use by all Departments
More informationScoping Framework: Scoping Projects for Easier Cost Estimating
Scoping Framework: Scoping Projects for Easier Cost Estimating Darrin DeReus, Ph.D. Air Force Cost Support Project Manager Senior Cost Analyst 25 July 2014 Purpose Show a current project Discuss the current
More informationEXPRESS PROGRAMMATIC STATEMENT OF WORK TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXPRESS PROGRAMMATIC STATEMENT OF WORK TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SCOPE 3.0 PROGRAMMATIC FUNCTIONAL SPECIALTY AREAS 3.1. PS1 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 3.2. PS2 COST ESTIMATING/ANALYSIS 3.3.
More informationSelected Acquisition Report (SAR)
Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-355 Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) As of FY 2017 President's Budget Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) March 4, 2016
More informationCost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) & Earned Value Management (EVM) Training
Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) & Earned Value Management (EVM) Training Defense Cost and Resource Center Orlando, Florida November 18 19, 2014 Agenda: November 18 8:00 8:30 Combined Introduction
More informationAFCAA CEM Tabular CARD Train the Trainer
Headquarters U.S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e AFCAA CEM Tabular CARD Train the Trainer May 2016 DRAFT 2 Outline Tabular CARD Basics Table Features Describing Your
More informationAMRDEC Counterfeit Risk Management Recommendations
AMRDEC Counterfeit Risk Management Recommendations Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Review completed by the AMRDEC Public Affairs Office 29 Aug 2013; PR0033.. August 2013 Presented
More informationHow to Use the Government Furnished Property Attachments: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
How to Use the Government Furnished Property Attachments: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Presented by: Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP) 1 This information:» Should not be construed as changing
More informationCollection of Operating and Support Data from Weapon System Support Contracts
INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES Collection of Operating and Support Data from Weapon System Support Contracts Lance M. Roark, Project Leader Waynard C. Devers James A. Myers Robert L. Suchan Christopher
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: DISTRIBUTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DoD) DEPOT MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD (50/50) REPORT Number: Approved Date: 20160322 AMSC Number: F9645 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No
More informationCOST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE. CADE Overview & Portal Navigation
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE CADE Overview & Portal Navigation CADE Overview is CADE? http://cade.osd.mil Cost Earned Value (EVM) Acquisition Technical Library Actuals: Cost & Technical Program and
More informationDCMA MANUAL PLANT CLEARANCE
DCMA MANUAL 2501-04 PLANT CLEARANCE Office of Primary Responsibility: Contract Maintenance Effective: February 14, 2019 Releasability: Cleared for public release New Issuance Implements: DCMA-INST 2501,
More informationPerformance Assessments and Root Cause Analyses
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED: 15-S-1951, 15 JUL 2015. 0 Performance Assessments and Root Cause Analyses August 13, 2015 Mr. Gary Bliss Director, PARCA gary.r.bliss.civ@mail.mil 571-256-0646
More informationPreparing for the Future: Electronic Data Delivery and the DCMA Automated Surveillance Process
Preparing for the Future: Electronic Data Delivery and the DCMA Automated Surveillance Process Dave Scott, BDO USA, dmscott@bdo.com Date: January 18, 2018 Learning Objectives Understand the new DCMA automated
More informationApex Industries Inc. 100 Millennium Blvd. Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada E1E 2G8 Purchase Order Quality Assurance Clauses
Issue: 1 Rev. L Date: 20-Aug-2015 Page 1 of 7 Any product and/or service (hereafter referred to as product ) supplied to fulfill an (Apex) purchase order must be provided in accordance with the quality
More informationData Item Description
Data Item Description Title: Software/Firmware Change Request Approval Date: 20100420 Number: Limitation: N/A AMSC Number: N9130 GIDEP Applicable: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility:
More informationDOD INSTRUCTION BUSINESS SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS AND ACQUISITION
DOD INSTRUCTION 5000.75 BUSINESS SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS AND ACQUISITION Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Effective: February 2, 2017 Change
More informationProgram Manager's Desktop Guide for Continuous Acquisition and Life-Cycle Support (CALS) Implementation. 14 March 1997
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. Program Manager's Desktop Guide for Continuous Acquisition and Life-Cycle Support (CALS) Implementation 14 March 1997 Foreword
More informationNew Acquisition Policy and Its Impact on Systems Engineering
New Acquisition Policy and Its Impact on Systems Engineering NDIA 11 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference October 21, 2008 Sharon Vannucci Systems and Software Engineering/Enterprise Development Office
More informationATSP4 RFP Questions and Answers Last edited 10 March 2015 Questions have been modified only to provide anonymity
ATSP4 RFP Questions and Answers Last edited 10 March 2015 Questions have been modified only to provide anonymity This Q&A document provides responses to questions submitted to DMEA in response to both
More informationSelected Acquisition Report (SAR)
Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-468 B61 Mod 12 Life Extension Program Tailkit Assembly (B61 Mod 12 LEP TKA) As of December 31, 2012 Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
More informationNational Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Small Business Conference
National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Small Business Conference Faye Esaias Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego faye.esaias@navy.mil What is the government buying? Items to support
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE FOR CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS
NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE MIL-STD-1839C 27 November 2000 SUPERSEDING MIL-STD-1839B 20 AUGUST 1995 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE FOR CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS AMSC F4562 AREA QCIC
More informationDownloaded from DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE FOR CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS
NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE 27 November 2000 SUPERSEDING MIL-STD-1839B 20 AUGUST 1995 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE FOR CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS AMSC F4562 AREA QCIC DISTRIBUTION
More informationINSPECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
MILITARY SPECIFICATIONS MIL-I-45208A INSPECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS This specification has been approved by the Department of Defense and is mandatory for use by all Agencies. 1. SCOPE 1.1 Scope. This
More informationDAU-South Acquisition Update February 23, 2017 Session Topics and Descriptions (Presentations will be available for download after the event.
DAU-South Acquisition Update February 23, 2017 Session Topics and Descriptions (Presentations will be available for download after the event.) Session 1: 8:00 9:30 am (CENTRAL) 1.1: Understanding Government:
More informationAMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES J 1 8 2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
More informationMCMR-AAP-A 24 May 2013
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH AND MATERIEL COMMAND 504 SCOTT STREET FORT DETRICK MD 21702-5014 MCMR-AAP-A 24 May 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this memorandum
More informationREQUEST FOR DEVIATION (RFD) Army Materiel Command (AMC)
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: REQUEST FOR DEVIATION (RFD) Army Materiel Command (AMC) Number: DI-CMAN-81590 Approval Date: 5 October 2000 AMSC Number: A7405 Limitation: None DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable:
More informationCOST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE. Bill of Material (BOM) Data Item Description (DID) Review
COST ASSESSMENT DATA ENTERPRISE Bill of Material (BOM) Data Item Description (DID) Review Summary of IPT Effort & Path Forward BOM Objectives Problem Statement: Current FAR/DFARS Requirements provide very
More informationSAM Supplement Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors for Government Related Orders
PRIME Contractor/Offeror System Studies and Simulation Inc, 615 Discovery Drive, Huntsville, AL 35806 (256) 539-1700 SAM Supplement Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors for
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION TITLE: TRAINING EVALUATION DOCUMENT Number: DI-PSSS-81524C Approval Date:
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION TITLE: TRAINING EVALUATION DOCUMENT Number: DI-PSSS-81524C Approval Date: 20141120 AMSC Number: N9493 Limitation: DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office Of Primary Responsibility:
More informationPARCA EVM PARCA. EVM Central Repository Analyst Guide. June Office of Performance Assessments and Root Cause Analyses (PARCA)
PARCA Central Repository Analyst Guide June 2016 0 ANALYST GUIDE The following document provides step-by-step illustrations of the major actions performed by Analysts in the -CR system: Obtaining an ECA
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8320.04 September 3, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, vember 14, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Item Unique Identification (IUID) Standards for Tangible Personal Property
More informationAREA HFAC. AMSC A6121 on Stwent A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MIL-STD May ,..
Downloaded from http://wwweveryspeccom m 13May 1991 - --, MILITARY STANDARD TASK PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AMSC A6121 on Stwent A Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited AREA HFAC Downloaded
More informationUnderstanding Requirements for Subcontract EV flow down and Management
Understanding Requirements for Subcontract EV flow down and Management Introduction The purpose of an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) is to accurately portray the project plan, changes, status, costs,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SOFTWARE RESOURCE DATA REPORT (SRDR) VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION (V&V) GUIDE VERSION 3.0
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SOFTWARE RESOURCE DATA REPORT (SRDR) VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION (V&V) GUIDE VERSION 3.0 29 February 2016 Primary Authors: Nicholas Lanham, NCCA Mike Popp, OMNITEC/NAVAIR 4.2 This
More informationSelected Acquisition Report (SAR)
Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-474 F-22 Increment 3.2B Modernization (F-22 Inc 3.2B Mod) As of FY 2017 President's Budget Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR)
More informationReliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Update
Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Update Mr. Andrew Monje Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 15th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference San
More informationIntroduction to Cost Estimation - Part I
Introduction to Cost Estimation - Part I Best Practice Checklists Best Practice 1: Estimate Purpose and Scope The estimate s purpose is clearly defined The estimate s scope is clearly defined The level
More information2016 NAVSUP STRATEGY (in process of update)
2016 NAVSUP STRATEGY (in process of update) The Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) established its Small Business Strategy in 2015, identifying how NAVSUP will incorporate and promote small business
More informationDCMA Manual Negotiation Intelligence Procedures
DCMA Manual 2401-01 Negotiation Intelligence Procedures Office of Primary Responsibility Negotiation Intelligence Capability Effective: December 20, 2018 Releasability: Cleared for public release Implements:
More informationReducing Lifecycle Sustainment Costs
UNCLASSIFIED Reducing Lifecycle Sustainment Costs Hon David J. Berteau Assistant Secretary of Defense (Logistics and Materiel Readiness) Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public
More informationMIL-HDBK-512A 31 October 2001 SUPERSEDING MIL-HDBK October 2000 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK PARTS MANAGEMENT
NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE MIL-HDBK-512A 31 October 2001 SUPERSEDING MIL-HDBK-512 04 October 2000 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK PARTS MANAGEMENT This handbook is for guidance only. Do not cite this document
More informationProduct Support Publication Requirements
Product Support Publication Requirements Robin Alexander 06 December 2012 Purpose To discuss requirements set forth by Department of Defense, Department of the Army and Logistics Support Activity (LOGSA)
More informationSupplier Quality Clauses
Requirement Name Management System Design, Process, or Material Changes Submission of Nonconforming Material to POC Deviation / Waiver Resubmission of Material Notification of Previous Delivery of Defective
More informationValidation rules were updated Minor changed were made related to editing 2015 CSDR/EVM Co-Plans
What s New Updates for Version 2.6.1, Feb 27, 2017 Validation rules were updated Minor changed were made related to editing 2015 CSDR/EVM Co-Plans Updates for Version 2.6, Feb 1, 2016 Added support for
More informationINTRODUCTION TO PARTS MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION TO PARTS MANAGEMENT Parts Standardization and Management Committee LMI Approved for Public Release COURSE INFORMATION Defense Acquisition University Continuous Learning Register Browse CLL
More informationDepartment of Defense Risk Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs
Department of Defense Risk Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs 7th Edition (Interim Release) December 2014 Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering Washington,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK PARTS MANAGEMENT
NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE MIL-HDBK-512A 31 October 2001 SUPERSEDING MIL-HDBK-512 04 October 2000 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK PARTS MANAGEMENT This handbook is for guidance only. Do not cite this document
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: MANUFACTURING PLAN Number: Approval Date: 20130118 AMSC Number: N9311 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility: AS/AIR 4.1.9/PMA-251
More informationDFARS Business Systems Compliance. March 11, 2015
DFARS Business Systems Compliance March 11, 2015 Speakers Steven Tremblay Ernst & Young Executive Director Government Contract Services Jack Gay Ernst & Young Senior Manager Government Contract Services
More informationMIL-STD October 2007 SUPERSEDING MIL-HDBK-512A 31 October 2001 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE PARTS MANAGEMENT
NOT SENSITIVE MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE 15 October 2007 SUPERSEDING MIL-HDBK-512A 31 October 2001 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE PARTS MANAGEMENT AMSC 7730 AREA SDMP FOREWORD 1. This standard is approved
More informationWBS vs CES: Navigating Different Structures for Software Systems
WBS vs CES: Navigating Different Structures for Software Systems Bakari Dale and Brad Dahlin 1 Agenda The Challenge: Developing a WBS for AIS/DBS Sustainment activities Generating the WBS Data Dictionary
More information