MAURY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Similar documents
DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

STUART-HOBSON MIDDLE SCHOOL

PLUMMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

SEATON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

NOYES EDUCATION CAMPUS

SHEPHERD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

RAYMOND EDUCATION CAMPUS

LEWIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

NALLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

WATKINS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

BARNARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

WALKER-JONES EDUCATION CAMPUS

LASALLE - BACKUS EDUCATION CAMPUS

LECKIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

WILKINSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

PATTERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

POWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

BALLOU SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

GARFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

School Without Walls

KEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

EASTERN HIGH SCHOOL. Site Plan East Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, DC INITIAL YEAR BUILT 1923

COOLIDGE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

LOGAN SCHOOL SCHOOL WITHOUT WALLS AT LOGAN

Evansville Public Schools. Facility Assessment Report January 28, 2 , General Building Data

Collins Middle School

Stevens High School Pre Bond Presentation Claremont, NH

GFW Schools Task Force Meeting 1/23/19 R.A. MORTON & ASSOCIATES GLT ARCHITECTS 1

Coos Bay Best Bond Cost Breakdowns

Deficiency ID Qty UoM Priority. K Play Area Requires Impact Resistant Material Ea. 2

Chenango Valley Central School District Potential Capital Project BCK-IBI Group Project No October 23, 2017

Biddeford School Department

Facilities Feasibility Study Laurence G. Paquin Building Condition Assessment

School Assessment Report

3. 21st Century Learning A. Districtwide Flexible Learning $600,000 Subtotal $600,000

Facilities Feasibility Study Frederick Douglass HS Condition Assessment

FACILITY COMPONENTS - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Appendix J - Custom Uniformat for EDU Migration

School Assessment Report

Deficiency ID Qty UoM Priority. Concrete Walks Are Damaged And Require Replacement ,000 SF 3

School Assessment Report

FACILITY COMPONENTS - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Priority 1 Maintenance Projects Total Investment Needed: $54,875,317. Elementary Schools

Facilities Feasibility Study Matthew A. Henson ES Condition Assessment

CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Deferred Maintenance Plan

School Assessment Report

Board Work Session Feasibility Study. January 9, 2017

The Report: Priority 1 thru 5 $ 2,933,064 New Construction $ 6,797,031 Less Redlined Items $ 218,060

School Assessment Report

School Assessment Report

Addendum to Agenda Item: SUPERINTENDENT S PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMEMT PLAN

MCER Study for Little Powder K-8

Edmonton Public School District No. 7

Project Scope & Budget Breakdown. Mandatory Scope Recommended Additional Scope Wish List Scope

FACILITY COMPONENTS - MIDDLE SCHOOL

Timberglen Recreation Center Summary

Existing Site Aerial Frederick High School Feasibility Study September 5, 2012

Mount Vernon Elementary School Grades PK 5

Belington Elementary School Grades PK 5

Corsicana High School

Presented November 21, 2013 BEDFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Facility Assessment Report. pmcresa.com

2016 BOND INFORMATION

Simcoe County District School Board. 5yr Condition Assessment 2006/07 to 2010/11. Hillcrest PS (Barrie), 9205

Health Life Safety Survey and Master Facilities Plan

PRESENTATION JANUARY 24, 2017

Independence Adult Center

School Assessment Report

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Committee on Budget and Finance ******************************************************************************

MOORESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL REFERENDUM PROJECTS

BRUCE MONROE AT PARK VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROPOSED MAIN ENTRY - EXTERIOR RENDERING

0B MAGNOLIA HALL. Scale: 1:110. Date: Feb Time: 7:40 pm. User: brady. 10 ft

Santa Teresa High School

K.B. Polk Recreation Center Summary

Simcoe County District School Board. 5yr Condition Assessment 2006/07 to 2010/11. Warnica PS, 9283

FREMONT UNIFIED. Thornton Middle School Conversion S C H O O L D I S T R I C T. Quattrocchi Kwok Architects. Sept 26, 2018

FEASIBILITY STUDY SEPTEMBER 1 8,

James Lick High School

BLIND BROOK-RYE UFSD SCHOOL FACILITIES PLANNING SECOND UPDATE ON RECOMMENDED PROJECTS

INSPIRE each student to develop a strong

Facility Improvements

DeKalb County School District/Stadiums Avondale Stadium Final School Assessment Report May 20, 2016

Facility Improvements

DRAFT FY15/16. TBD Roof Repairs $50,000

Kasson Elementary/Middle School Grades PK 8

Hartsville Area Schools - Building Evaluations

Al Behrman Elementary School

Cupertino Union School District

Cultural Facilities: Capital Needs Inventory and Priorities. Arts, Culture and Libraries Committee October 17, 2016

REHABILITATION STANDARDS CHECKLIST

Completed. Project. Melbourne High School. Comprehensive Additions and Renovations

DENNIS TOWNSHIP FEASIBILITY STUDY

Prepared by. Christopher La Follette. Fidelis Management, Inc.

Hartsville Area Schools - Building Evaluations

Architect and Engineer: Friar Associates inc.

UPPER ARLINGTON SCHOOLS 2015 FACILITIES ASSESSMENT. Windermere Elementary School Physical Assessment

Mills Elementary School Site Summary

HISTORIC PLAN, FLOOR PLANS, AERIAL PHOTOS

HILLSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Overview: Livingston School District Hillside Elementary School

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Transcription:

INITIAL YEAR BUILT 1886 BUILDING AREA 46,800 SF CURRENT PROGRAM CAPACITY 276 ENROLLMENT 2008 238 WARD 6 PROPOSED PROGRAM CAPACITY 325 Site Plan MAURY - 1

PROPOSED PROGRAM PROFILE GRADE CONFIGURATION PK-5 SQ. FT. (EXISTING) 46,800 TYPE PROPOSED TYPE PROPOSED Pre-School 1 Pre-Kindergarten 2 Kindergarten 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 Gym Bleachers Locker Rooms Gym-Cafeteria Cafetorium Gym-Cafetorium Gym-Auditorium Auditorium Multi-Purpose 1 Cafeteria Kitchen Services 1 Special Education 1 Media Center 1 Administrative/Health Suite 1 Computer Lab 1 OT/PT 1 Science Lab Art 1 Music 1 Teacher Workroom 1 Parent Resource 1 Proposed Planning Profiles The inventory of spaces listed here is intended to outline the program of educational and support spaces necessary to support the proposed program capacity. Individual educational specifications and facility programs will be developed with the School Improvement and School Planning / Design teams at the time of project initiation. MAURY - 2

CONDITION ASSESSMENT Building System ADA Compliance Conveying Systems Electrical Exterior Finish HVAC Interior Finish Plumbing Roof Structure Technology 2008 Rating Unsatisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Unsatisfactory Poor Fair Poor Fair Fair Poor Condition Assessment The body of information summarized below is based on a detailed facility condition assessment completed in 2006 and updated by visual observations conducted in 2007. Improvement initiatives completed by OPEFM in 2007 and 2008 are noted in red text in each section. An overall summary of work completed under various OPEFM programs is provided at the end of the condition assessment. Condition Scorecard These ratings reflect the overall condition and level of replacement need for an entire system, in adherence with the Facility Condition Index (FCI) System, categorizing systems as Good (FCI <.25), Fair (FCI 0.25 0.50), Poor (FCI 0.51 0.85), or Unsatisfactory (FCI >.86). Comments: 1 Conveying System There is no escalator, lift, or elevator in the building. 2 Electrical 3 Exterior Finish Original equipment in poor condition. Electrical cables and wiring are over forty years old. There is no emergency generator. The fire alarm system is not code compliant. Lighting is generally in fair condition but not particularly energy efficient. Windows are in poor condition and not operable; single pane and need replacement. Brickwork in fair condition and in need of sporadic repointing or other minor repair work. Exterior doors need to be repaired or replaced. 2007: Replaced Exterior Lighting. 4 Structure Exterior structure is in fair condition. Repainting and masonry repairs needed in areas. 5 HVAC 6 Interior Finish 7 Plumbing 8 Roof Ventilation and exhaust systems in building are not operational. Cooling by window units in many cases is unsatisfactory as the units are in poor condition. Visible ductwork in poor condition and should be replaced. 2007: Heating Plant Upgrades. 2008: Repairs to boiler(s) and Classroom heating units. Installed 2 AC Window Units. Service to HVAC units has been completed. AC unit replacements also completed. Asbestos floor tiles throughout represents potential health safety issue. Interior finishes are worn. Isolated areas of walls and ceilings require patching and repainting. 2007: Replace ceiling tiles completed, flooring, plaster repair, and painting completed. No sprinkler system in 1961 portion. Hot water system valves and pump need replacement. Fixtures are outdated and not code compliant. Drinking fountains should also be replaced. 2007: Plumbing completed. Portions of the building roofing are in poor condition and need replacement. Membranes, slate, and metal seams are all used for roofing materials and all require some manner of repair. Flashing and gutters should be maintained to a higher standard. MAURY - 3

9 ADA Compliance Building does not meet ADA code requirements. A few deficiencies are: conveying, access, fixtures and alarms. 10 Technology Little to no technology was observed. Visual inspection is a limited tool for technology assessments. Upgrades should include software, hardware, networking, and a climate controlled environment to house the equipment. 11 Grounds Parking lot needs repaving or resurfacing. The playground needs repaving as well. MAURY - 4

RECENT HISTORY OF MODERNIZATION 2007 WHOLE SCHOOL BLITZ Interior Finishes - Door Replacements/Door Hardware Repair Interior Finishes - Drywall & Ceiling Repairs Interior Finishes - Select Carpet Replacements/Flooring Repairs Interior Finishes - Painting/Plastering Plumbing Repairs - Restrooms/Fixtures & Flush Valves; Water Fountains Electrical Repairs - Lighting & Power Mechanical Repairs - AHU & Boiler Repairs, HVAC Filter Replacement Exterior Work & Building Envelope - Lighting, Site Work, Playground, etc. Other Work Orders 2008 STABILIZATIONS Emergency Security Repair Work (Exterior Lighting Replacements) AC Window Units Installations & Electrical Upgrades LEGACY PROJECTS - OTHER STABLIZATIONS Mechanical - Boiler Replacements/Heating Plant Upgrades Planning Design Pre-Construction In Progress Completed MAURY - 5

Basement Concept Plans These floor plans represent planning concepts for proposed facility use, aligning the proposed program capacity, the proposed planning profiles, and the conceptual reconfiguration of the building. Each project is subject to a formal design process, incorporating input from the School Improvement team at the time of project initiation. MAURY - 6

First Floor Concept Plans These floor plans represent planning concepts for proposed facility use, aligning the proposed program capacity, the proposed planning profiles, and the conceptual reconfiguration of the building. Each project is subject to a formal design process, incorporating input from the School Improvement team at the time of project initiation. MAURY - 7

Second Floor Concept Plans These floor plans represent planning concepts for proposed facility use, aligning the proposed program capacity, the proposed planning profiles, and the conceptual reconfiguration of the building. Each project is subject to a formal design process, incorporating input from the School Improvement team at the time of project initiation. MAURY - 8