A SURVEY OF PESTICIDE USE ON PEANUTS IN NORTH CAROLINA. Data Report. Submitted to the
|
|
- Earl Miles
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A SURVEY OF PESTICIDE USE ON PEANUTS IN NORTH CAROLINA Data Report Submitted to the National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program Extension Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture on May 0, 203 Prepared by Dr. Doris Sande. Impact Evaluation Specialist Southern Integrated Pest management Center (SIPMC) North Carolina State University Contributors David Jordan Department of Crop Science North Carolina State University Rick L. Brandenburg Department of Entomology North Carolina State University Barbara Shew Department of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University
2 Acknowledgments The following county extension directors and agents are acknowledged for their valuable participation in the mail survey of peanut growers: Lewis Smith (Perquimans County), Paul Smith, (Gates County), Richard Rhodes, (Bertie county), Roy Thagard, (Greene County), Al Cochran, (Martin County), Mike Carroll, (Craven county), Walter Earle (Wilson County), Art Bradley, (Edgecombe County). The use of trade names of pesticides in this report does not imply endorsement of these products by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service nor discrimination against similar products not mentioned. ii
3 Table of Contents Introduction Survey of Peanut Growers Survey Method Survey Results Summary Literature Cited Appendix A: Peanut Growers Survey Questionnaire Appendix B: Peanut Growers Survey Data Appendix C: Trade and Common Names of Pesticides iii
4 Introduction Pesticides are essential to modem crop production and it is important that those pesticide chemicals necessary for effective crop production continue to be available to the grower. In 976, the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) established the National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program (NAPlAP) for the purpose of providing 'the most objective and accurate data available for defining and evaluating benefits and risks of selected pesticides having critical agricultural and forestry uses." Information on the uses and benefits of specific pesticide active ingredients is furnished by Extension specialists and Experiment Station researchers in the various states to the NAPlAP. Amendments to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act in 988 accelerated the reregistration of older pesticide active ingredients by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, which increased the demand for data on the benefits and uses of pesticides. Surveys of growers are required to collect detailed information on actual pesticide use on economically important agricultural commodities to help state Extension specialists and researchers provide information on the uses and benefits of pesticides and their alternatives more timely and accurately. Surveys are also needed to quantify the implementation of IPM on agricultural crops. Finally, survey data supports other federal and state initiatives such as sustainable agriculture, food safety, and minor crop registration and water quality. Since the initiation of the National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program (NAPIAP), data on the uses and benefits of numerous pesticide active ingredients in North Carolina have been assembled and submitted to NAPlAP Pesticide Assessment Teams. In anticipation of further data requests from Assessment Teams, a series of surveys of North Carolina producers was initiated by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service in 989 to determine pesticide use patterns on economically important crops in the state. Pesticide use surveys have been conducted for the 988 peanut crop, 989 flue cured tobacco and potato crops, 990 apple and cucumber crops, 99 sweet potato crop, 992 cotton crop, 993 tomato and poultry crops, 994 potato and Christmas tree crops, 995 peanut crop and 996 sweet potato crop (Bailey et al. 99, 993; Toth 99, 992, , 996a, 996b, 997a, 997b; Toth et al. 993, 994a, 994b. 996a, 996b). Results from the surveys are maintained in a database in order to help Extension specialists and researchers answer Assessment Team requests for information on the uses and benefits of pesticides and their alternatives more timely and accurately. Because pesticide use data collected from grower surveys must be updated periodically to accurately assess pesticide benefits to agriculture, the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service is repeating those grower surveys conducted five or more years ago. Comprehensive data on pesticide use and benefits to peanut producers in North Carolina were needed due to the economic importance of peanut production to the state. Total peanut production in North Carolina in 20 was 292 million pounds, representing approximately 8% of the U. S. production (USDA NASS 202). North Carolina is ranked fourth among the states in peanut production. Peanuts produced in the state in 20 were valued at approximately $97 million. A survey of peanut producers in 0 North Carolina counties was conducted by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service in 989 and 996 to determine pesticide use on the 988 and 995 crop, respectively. This surveys provided extremely useful pesticide use and benefit data; however, these data are more than ten years old and needed
5 updating to reflect changes in peanut pest management in the state since 995. Current data on pest management on peanuts was also needed to quantify the implementation of IPM by North Carolina peanut growers since 995. The purpose of this project was to acquire data on pesticide use and benefits in peanut production in North Carolina in 20. Objectives of the project were the following:. To collect data from peanut producers on their use of herbicides, insecticides, nematicides, and fungicides in North Carolina during 20. Data collected from the producers responding to the survey will include the acres treated and number of applications per acre of each pesticide reported. 2. To gather information from North Carolina peanut producers on their use of non chemical methods of pest control in To obtain general information from producers on peanut production in North Carolina in 20. Information collected will include the acres produced and the average yield per acre. 4. To provide the National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program with information from Objectives 3 for inclusion in a national database for pesticide assessments. 5. To use information from Objectives 3 to help specialists and researchers respond to Assessment Team requests for pesticide use/benefit data from North Carolina. 6. To make information from Objectives 3 available to Extension specialists and county agents to assist in evaluating the success of current Extension programs relating to integrated pest management by North Carolina peanut producers and in planning future programs involving this clientele. 7. To prepare Extension and/or research publications containing information generated from the present and past surveys of pesticide use by North Carolina producers and distribute these publications to interested persons, agricultural groups, and government agencies. 2
6 Survey of Peanut Growers Survey Method On September 20, 995, a committee composed of Gene Sullivan, Dudley Lameck, Mike Linker and Alan York of the Crop Science Department, Jack Bailey of the Plant Pathology Department, and Rick Brandenburg and Steve Toth of the Entomology Department at North Carolina State University met in Raleigh, North Carolina to design a mail survey of North Carolina peanut producers. The committee discussed the design and scope of the survey at this meeting. The survey design selected is described in Dillman (978), Christenson (975), and Salant and Dillman (994). Based on this original survey, updates have been made to account for changes in peanut production practices since 995. Fig.. Counties included in the mail survey of peanut growers in North Carolina, 20. The survey was distributed by county agents to all peanut growing counties in North Carolina. These counties include: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Chowan, Columbus, Cumberland, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Jones, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Onslow, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Sampson, Scotland, Washington, Wayne and Wilson. Responses were received from growers in the following 2 counties; Beaufort, Bertie, Craven, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Jones, Martin, Perquimans, Pitt, Wayne and Wilson. Approximately 00 peanut growers were selected randomly from the county mailing lists for participation in the survey. County agents reviewed the mailing lists for accuracy and eliminated those names on the lists which are not active peanut growers. A total of 00 peanut growers in the aforementioned 2 North Carolina counties were contacted by mail a maximum of three times in March and April of 202. On March 9, a cover letter signed by the county Extension agent, a questionnaire, and a stamped, self addressed return envelope was mailed from the county Extension center to each peanut grower. The 7 page questionnaire requested information regarding the chemical and nonchemical pest management practices used by growers in 20 (Appendix A, pg. ). On March 26, a postcard from the county Extension agent was mailed to each grower as a reminder to complete and 3
7 return the questionnaire sent previously. Finally, on April 9, another letter, questionnaire and stamped, self addressed return envelope was mailed from the county Extension agent to those growers not responding to previous mailings. Information contained on survey questionnaires returned by peanut growers was entered into a computer database and analyzed in the Department of Crop Science at North Carolina State University. Peanut Production. Survey Results A total of 27 (27.0%) peanut growers responded to the survey (Appendix B; page 24). These respondents planted 6827 acres of peanuts in 20 (Appendix B; page 25). Peanut growers responding to the survey harvested 6806 acres of peanuts (Appendix B; page 27). By comparison, 8,000 acres of peanuts were harvested in North Carolina in 20 (USDA NASS). The statewide average yield of peanuts in 20 was 3,600 pounds per acre. The respondents average yield in 20 was (Appendix B; page 28). Pesticide Use. All of the peanut growers responding to the survey used herbicides to manage grasses and broadleaf weeds in their peanuts in 20 (Appendix B; page 29). Morning glory, palmer amaranth, sickle pod, lambs quarters, crabgrass, pigweed ragweed, cocklebur, Bermuda grass, nutsedge, fall panicum, and broadleaf were the most common grasses for which herbicides were applied by survey respondents (Appendix B; page 30). Herbicides applied before planting, at the cracking stage, and between emergence and harvest, for the peanut crop in 20 are reported in Appendix B (pages 3 32). Ninetysix percent of survey respondents used insecticides to manage insects and/or spider mites. The insects and mites for which insecticides and miticides were used on peanuts in 20 were thrips, corn earworms, southern corn rootworms, and fall armyworms (Appendix B; page 33). Insecticides applied by survey respondents during planting to manage insects (i.e. thrips, leafhoppers, aphids and wireworms) are reported in Appendix B (page 33). Appendix B (pages 34 35) also includes those insecticides and miticides used by respondents to manage early season (i.e., thrips and leafhoppers), mid season insects (i.e., southern corn rootworms) and late season insects and/or mites (i.e., corn earworms, fall armyworms and spider mites) on peanuts in 20. Fumigants and/or nematicides were used by 46% of peanut growers to manage nematodes in their peanut crops in 20 (Appendix B; page 35). Fumigants applied by survey respondents prior to planting and nematicides applied at planting to manage nematodes are reported in Appendix B (pages 36). Ninety six percent of peanut growers used fungicides and/or fumigants to manage diseases in their peanut crops in 20 (Appendix 8; page 36). The primary diseases for which fungicides were used in peanut fields in 20 were peanut leaf spot, stem rot (white mold), CBR (black root rot), Rhizoctonia limb rot and Sclerotinia blight (Appendix B; page 37). Fungicides used by survey respondents to manage peanut leaf spot, CBR, and stem rot, Sclerotinia blight or Rhizoctonia limb rot are included in Appendix B (pages 37 39). 4
8 Integrated Pest Management Practices. Peanut growers were asked on the survey questionnaire if they practiced integrated pest management (IPM) in growing peanuts. Seventy eight percent of the growers responding to the question indicated they did use IPM, while 22% reported that they did not (Appendix B; page 40). Approximately 78% of growers considered IPM to be a good pest management practice, while 22% thought IPM was too risky for managing peanut pests (Appendix B; page 4). The primary sources of peanut pest management information for peanut growers were the Cooperative Extension Service (96%), Extension handbook (78%), pesticide dealers (67% of survey respondents), consultants (67%) and others (Appendix B; page 44). 96 percent of the peanut growers responded that they rotated the fields on which they planted peanuts as a means of pest management (Appendix B; page 4). Cotton and corn were the predominant crops they rotated with peanuts (Appendix B; page 4). 33% of survey respondents cultivated their fields, of which 78% cultivated once, % cultivated twice and four times to manage weeds (Appendix B; pages 43). All peanut growers tested their soil for fertility, while only 5% had leaf tissue analyzed for nutrient levels (Appendix B; page 42). Approximately 22% of peanut growers took a soil sample for nematode analysis (Appendix B; page 44). When asked to report how often they use the peanut leaf spot advisory to time fungicide applications, 4% of the survey respondents indicated they used the advisory all of the time, % most of the time, 37% some of the time, and 26% never used the advisory (Appendix B; page 38). Seven percent indicated that they were not aware of the advisory. Grower Information. The peanut growers responding to the survey indicated that they have been growing peanuts an average of 22.7 years. About 93% of the survey respondents were full time growers, while 7% were part time growers (Appendix B; page 46). The lowest level of formal education was 2th grade or less for % of growers, while approximately 48% graduated high school (Appendix B; page 47). Twenty six percent of growers attended two year colleges, and 5% attended four year colleges. Summary A mail survey of peanut growers was conducted to determine pesticide use on peanuts in 20 in North Carolina. Pesticide use data collected from the grower survey are presented in this report. The data will serve to fill gaps in a national data base maintained by the U. S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program to enhance the pesticide assessment process. Extension specialists and researchers in North Carolina can use the information in responses to data requests from NAPlAP Pesticide Assessment Teams. Extension recommendations for pesticide use in peanut production in North Carolina can be found in Lumpkins (998). 5
9 Literature Cited Bailey, J. E., H. D. Tilmon, S. J. Toth, Jr., and P. M. Phipps. 99. Computer assisted evaluation of the economic impact of cancellation of pesticide registrations. Plant Disease 75: Bailey, J. E., G. L. Johnson, and S. J. Toth, Jr Evolution of a weather based peanut leaf spot spray advisory in North Carolina. Plant Disease 78: Christenson, J. A A procedure for conducting mail surveys with the general public. J. Community Development Society 6(): Dillman, D. A Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 325 pp. Lumpkins, D. B., ed North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University. Raleigh. 454 pp. Meadows, B. C., ed North Carolina Agricultural Statistics 996. Report Number 85. North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Raleigh. 32 pp. Salant, P. and D. A. Dillman How to Conduct Your Own Survey. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 232 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr. 99. A Survey of Pesticide Use on Apples, Cucumbers and Peanuts in North Carolina. Data Report to the USDA NAPlAP. June 99. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 256 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr A Survey of Pesticide Use on Sweet potatoes and Irish Potatoes in North Carolina. Data Report to the USDA NAPlAP. July 992. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 36 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr A Survey of Pesticide Use on Cotton in North Carolina. Data Report to the USDA NAPIAP. October 993. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 48 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr A Survey of Pesticide Use on Poultry and Tomatoes in North Carolina Part I. Tomatoes. Data Report to the USDA NAPIAP. March 995. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 42 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr. 996a. A Survey of Pesticide Use on Poultry and Tomatoes in North Carolina. Part II. Poultry. Data Report to the USDA NAPIAP. June 996. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 54 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr. 996b. A Survey of Pesticide Use on Potatoes and Christmas Trees in North Carolina. Part I. Potatoes. Data Report to the USDA NAPIAP. June 996. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 42 pp. 6
10 Toth, S. J., Jr. 997a. A Survey of Pesticide Use on Potatoes and Christmas Trees in North Carolina. Part II. Christmas Trees. Data Report to the USDA NAPIAP. June 997. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 02 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr. 997b. A Survey of Pesticide Use on Sweet potatoes in North Carolina. Data Report to the Southern Region Pesticide Impact Assessment Program. December 997. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 92 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr A Survey of Pesticide Use on Peanuts in North Carolina. Data Report to the USDA NAPIAP. March 998. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 52 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr., H. E. Duncan, D. W. Monks, K. A. Sorensen, and L. G. Wilson Potato Pest Management 989: A Survey of Pesticide Use and Other Pest Management Practices by North Carolina Potato Producers. AG 497. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 20 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr., J. E. Bailey, R. L. Brandenburg, G. A. Sullivan, A. C. York, and H. M. Linker. 994a. Peanut Pest Management 988: A Survey of Pesticide Use by North Carolina Peanut Producers. AG 498. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 20 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr., C. W. Averre, D. W. Monks, J. R. Schultheis, and K. A. Sorensen. 994b. Cucumber Pest Management 990: A Survey of Pesticide Use and Other Pest Management Practices by North Carolina Cucumber Producers. AG 499. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 20 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr., M. L. Parker, W. A. Skroch, T. B. Sutton, and J. F. Walgenbach. 996a. Apple Pest Management 990: A Survey of Pesticide Use and Other Pest Management Practices by North Carolina Apple Growers. AG 544. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 20 pp. Toth, S. J., Jr., C. W. Averre, D. W. Monks, J. R. Schultheis, and K. A. Sorensen. 996b. Sweet potato Pest Management 99: A Survey of Pesticide Use and Other Pest Management Practices by North Carolina Sweetpotato Producers. AG 547. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Raleigh. 20 pp. USDA NASS: Agricultural prices USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service: Crop Values 202 Summary (February 203) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service: Crop Production 20 Summary (January 202) 7
11 Appendix A Peanut Growers Survey Questionnaire PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES USED ON THE 20 PEANUT CROP: A SURVEY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRODUCERS This survey is one of a series conducted by the Cooperative Extension Service to determine pest management practices used on agricultural crops in North Carolina. The information collected will help us document the benefits of pesticides and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) to crop production in North Carolina. This is necessary to assure the continued availability of those pesticides important to producers. Please answer all of the questions. If you wish to comment on any questions or qualify your answers, feel free to use the space in the margins. Your comments will be read and taken into account. Thank you for your help. GENERAL INFORMATION Q Did you grow peanuts in 20? (Circle one). YES 2. NO Please continue Please return the questionnaire in stamped envelope Q 2 In which county did you grow peanuts in 20? (If more than one, list the county in which you grow the majority of your peanuts) County Q 3 How many acres of peanuts did you grow in 20? Q 4 What varieties of peanuts did you plant in 20? Please list the number of acres of each variety planted Code by variety so you list acres for each respondent for each variety Variety Bailey () Brantley CHAMPS Gregory NC V Perry Phillips Sugg VA98R (9) Others (list) Acres Planted 8
12 Q 5 How many acres of your 20 peanut crop were irrigated? Please list the number of acres of peanuts irrigated acres irrigated number of times irrigated Q 6 How many acres of peanuts did you grow with the following tillage practices in 20? Please list the number of acres of each Tillage Practice Disk chisel Moldboard plow Field Cultivate Rip and Bed in spring Rip and Bed or Bed in fall Bed in spring Strip till No till Acres Q 7 Did you plant a cover crop in fall 200 in your fields planted to peanuts in 20? Please list the cover crop. Cover crop Q 8 How many acres of peanuts did you harvest in 20? Please list the number of acres of peanuts harvested acres harvested Q 9 What was your average yield of peanuts in both 200 and 20? Please list the average pounds of peanuts produced per acre. _ pounds per acre in 200 _ pounds per acre in 200 Q 0 In addition to peanuts, what crops did you plant in 20? Please list the crops and the number of acres planted. Crop Acres Planted 9
13 Q Did you use any pesticides to manage weeds, insects, mites, nematodes and diseases in your 20 peanut crop?. YES 2. NO Please continue Please skip to question 39 HERBICIDE USE Q 2 Did you use any herbicides to manage grasses and broadleaf weeds in your 20 peanut crop? (Circle one).. YES 2. NO Please continue Please skip to question 8 Q 3 For which of the following grasses and broadleaf weeds did you use herbicides in your peanut fields? (Check all that apply) Bermudagrass Broadleaf signalgrass Crabgrass Fall panicum Foxtails Goosegrass Johnsongrass Nutsedge Texas panicum Cocklebur Palmer amaranth Florida beggarweed Jimsonweed Lambsquarters Morningglory Pigweed (not palmer amaranth) Prickly sida Ragweed Sicklepod Spurred anoda Velvetleaf Others (list) Q 4 Which of the following herbicides were applied as a pre plant burn down or pre plant incorporated treatment? Please list the number of acres treated with each herbicide used (if none were used, write none) Herbicide Dual or Dual Magnum Glyphosate Intrro Outlook Paraquat Prowl Pursuit Sonalan Strongarm Valor SX Acres Treated 0
14 2.4 D Others (list): Q 5 Which of the following herbicides were applied as a pre plant burn down or pre plant incorporated treatment? Please list the number of acres treated with each herbicide used (if none were used, write none) Herbicide Dual or Dual Magnum Intrro Outlook Pursuit Strongarm Valor SX Others (list): Acres Treated Q 6 Which of the following herbicides were applied at crackling stage? Please list the number of acres treated with each herbicide used (if none were used, write none). Herbicide Basagran Dual or Dual Magnum Outlook Intrro Paraquat Pursuit Strongarm Others Acres Treated Q 7 Which of the following herbicides were applied between emergence and harvest of your peanuts? Please list the number of acres treated and the number of applications of each herbicide used (if none were used, write none) Herbicide Acres Treated # of Applications Basagran Cadre Classic
15 Clethodim Dual or Dual Magnum Intrro Paraquat Poast Pursuit Storm Ultra Blazer 2.4 DB Others INSECTICIDE AND MITICIDE USE Q 8 Do you use any insecticides to manage insects or mites in your peanut crop in 20? (Circle one). YES 2. NO Please continue Please skip to question 24 Q 9 For which of the following insects and mites did you use insecticides in your peanut fields? (Check all that apply). Aphids Corn earworms Fall armyworms Leafhoppers S. corn rootworms Spider mites Thrips Wireworms Others Q 20 Which of the following insecticides were applied during the planting in the seed furrow of your peanut crop to manage insects (i.e. thrips, leafhoppers, aphids, wireworms)? Please list the number of acres treated with each herbicide used (if none were used, write none). Insecticide Di Syston Orthene or Acephate Temik (applied in furrow) Thimet or Phorate Others (list): Acres Treated 2
16 Q 2 Which of the following insecticides were applied to your peanut crop to manage early season insects (i.e. thrips, leafhoppers)? Please list the number of acres treated and the number of applications of each insecticide used (if none were used, write none). Insecticide Acres Treated # of Applications Baythroid XL Asana XL Karate 2 Lannate Malathion Orthene or Acephate Sevin Others Q 22 Which of the following insecticides were applied at mid season to manage southern corn rootworms? Please list the number of acres treated with each herbicide used (if none were used, write none). Insecticide Lorsban Mocap Thimet Others (list): Acres Treated Q 23 Which of the following insecticides were applied to your peanut crop for late season management of insects and /or mites (i.e. corn earworms, fall armyworms, spider mites)? Please list the number of acres treated and the number of applications of each insecticide used (if none were used, write none) Insecticide Acres Treated # of Applications Asana XL Bythroid Comate Diazinon Karate Z Lannate Lorsban Omite 3
17 Orthene Sevin Steward Others NEMATICIDE USE Q 24 Did you use any fumigants or nematicides to manage nematodes in your 200 peanut crop? (Circle one).. YES 2. NO Please continue Please skip to question 27 Q 25 Which of the following fumigants were applied prior to planting to manage nematodes in your peanut crop? Please list the number of acres treated with each fumigant (if none were used, write none). Fumigant Busan Metam Telone C 7 Telone II UCB Vapam Others (list): Acres Treated Q 26 Which of the following nematicides were applied at planting to manage nematodes in your peanut crop? Please list the number of acres treated with each nematicide. (If none were used, write none) Nematicide Nemacur Temik Temik (applied in furrow) Others (list): Acres Treated 4
18 FUNGICIDE USE Q 27 Did you use any fungicides or fumigants to manage diseases in your 200 peanut crop? (Circle one). YES 2. NO Please continue Please skip to question 35 Q 28 For which of the following diseases did you use fungicides or fumigants in your peanut fields? (Check all that apply). CBR (black root rot) Peanut leaf spot Sclerotinia blight Stem tort Rhizoctonia limb rot Others (list below) Q 29 Did you apply fungicide in the seed furrow at planting Fungicide Proline Others (list): Acres Treated Q 30 Which of the following fungicides were applied to manage peanut leaf spot? Please list the acres treated and the number of applications of each fungicide used. (If none used, write NONE) Fungicide Acres Treated # of Applications Benlate Chlorothanlonil (various) Copper Dithane Convoy Endura Erito Headline Provost Stratego Q 3 How often do you use the leaf spot advisory (forecast) to time your fungicide applications for peanut leaf spot? (Check one) 5
19 ALL OF THE TIME MOST OF THE TIME SOME OF THE TIME NEVER LEAFSPOT ADVISORY NOT AVAILABLE NOT AWARE OF THE LEAFSPOT ADVISORY Q 32 How often do you use the Sclerotinia blight advisory (forecast) to time your fungicide applications for Sclerotinia blight? (Check one) ALL OF THE TIME MOST OF THE TIME SOME OF THE TIME NEVER SCLEROTINA BLIGHT ADVISORY NOT AVAILABLE NOT AWARE OF THE SCLEROTINA BLIGHT ADVISORY Q 33 Which of the following fumigants were applied to control CBR (black root rot)? Please list the # of acres treated with each fumigant used. (If none used, write NONE) Fumigant Busan Metam Vapam Others (list): Acres Treated Q 34 Which of the following fungicides were applied to manage stem rot, sclerotinia blight or rhizoctonia limb rot? Please list the # of acres treated and the number of applications of each fungicide used. (If none used, write NONE) Fungicide Acres Treated # of Applications Artisan Endura Headline Lorsban Omega 500 Proline Provost Tebuconazole (Folicur and various brands) Terrachlor (PCNB) Others 6
20 Q 35 Which of the following growth regulators or growth stimulators were applied to your peanuts in 20? Growth regulator Acres Treated # of applications Apogee Others (list): Q 36 Which of the following fertilizers were applied to your peanuts in 200? Fertilizer Acres Treated # of Applications Boron Calcium sulfate (gypsum or landplaster) Manganese Preplant fertilizer Others (list): Q 37 Which of the following inoculants did you apply to promote nitrogen fixation? Inoculant Acres Treated # of Applications In furrow liquid In furrow granular Applied in hopper with seed Others (list): Q 38 Did you apply more than one agrochemical (adjuvants, micronutrients, growth stimulants or regulators, pesticides) at the same time? Please provide the number of applications you made with the following number of agrochemicals placed in the tank at one time. applications Did all agrochemicals Agrochemicals in tank during season perform as expected (Yes or No) 2 7
21 or more INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Integrated pest management (IPM) involves scouting, planting resistant crop varieties, using disease and insect forecasts, analyzing soil for nematodes, mechanical weeding, and using thresholds to determine when to apply pesticides. Q 39 Did you practice Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in growing peanuts in 20? (Circle one). YES 2. NO Q 40 Do you consider IPM to be a good pest management practice or too risky for managing peanut pests? (Check one.) IPM is a good pest control practice IPM is too risky Q 4 Do you rotate the field(s) that you plant peanuts on each year? (Circle one.) YES 2 NO If yes, please list below the crops that you rotate with peanuts. Q 42 How many years separated peanut plantings? Please list as many different rotations as possible. Code by years between plantings and by acres Years between peanut Acres Q 43 Which of the following practices do you use to manage soil fertility in your peanut fields in 20? (Check all that apply) Soil samples were collected and analyzed to establish and maintain required levels of fertility and ph Analyzed leaf tissue to determine nutrient requirements 8
22 Applied fertilizer based on results of soil and/or leaf tissue analysis Q 44 Which of the following practices regarding pesticide selection and application did you use in growing your peanuts in 20 (Check all that apply.) chose pesticides less damaging to beneficial Insects Alternatively used different types of pesticides to lessen the development of resistance by pests Calibrated pesticide application equipment before use Used the lowest pesticide application rates needed to manage pests Applied pesticides as they were needed rather than routine spraying Kept records on the pesticides used, application rates and number of applications Trained workers in the proper handling and application of pesticides Q 45 Which of the following weed management practices did you use in growing your peanuts in 20? (Check all that apply.) Scouted your fields in the fall for weeds likely to be a problem for peanuts Scouted peanuts during the growing season to detect problem weeds Removed weeds and brush around peanut fields in the fall and spring (weeds are wild hosts for spider mites) Q 46 Did you cultivate your peanut fields for weed control in 20 (Circle one.) YES 2 NO If yes, how many times did you cultivate your peanut fields before and after planting in 20? Acres Times Q 47 Which of the following insect and mite management practices did you use in growing your peanuts in 20? (Check all that apply.) Peanut fields were scouted for leafhopper Infestation Peanut fields were scouted for thrips damage Peanut fields were scouted for corn earworms Peanut fields were scouted for spider mites Used southern corn rootworm advisory Used lesser tomato spotted wilt advisory Kept records of scouting information collected Used action threshold levels for insect or mite pests for deciding if and when to apply insecticides and miticides 9
23 Q 48 Which of the following nematode and disease management practices did you use in growing your peanuts in 20? (Check all that apply.) Took soil sample for nematode analysis Monitored leaf spot in fields beginning mid season Used Sclerotinia advisory to monitor conditions favorable for the development of Sclerotinia Monitored peanut crop for soil borne diseases such as black root rot, southern stem rot and Sclerotinia Q 49 Did you use pod mesocarp color (pod basting technique) to determine pod maturity and decide when to dig peanuts? If so, how many acres? NO YES Acres Q 50 Did you dig peanuts earlier than optimal maturity because of disease? If so, how many acres? NO YES Acres Q 5 From which of the following sources did you obtain information on peanut pest management in 20? (check all that apply). Another grower Consultant Cooperative Extension service Pesticide company representative Pesticide Dealer Plant disease / Insect clinic Extension Peanut Production handbook Farm magazine or newsletter NC Agricultural Chemicals Manual Newspaper, radio or television NC State peanut website Other source (specify) Q 52 Would you like to receive more information on Integrated Pest management? YES 2 NO If yes, which of the following methods do you prefer receiving IPM information? (Check all that apply.) Group Methods (e.g., farm demonstrations, field trips, scouting schools, IPM seminars, and crop production meetings) Printed Materials 20
24 (e.g., Extension bulletins, peanut production handbook, N. C. Agricultural Chemical Manual, newsletters, etc.) Direct Contact by County Agent, Consultant, Other (e.g., visit, telephone, fax, e mail etc.) Computer Network Q 53 How many years have you been growing peanut plantings? Please indicate the number of years you have been growing peanuts. NUMBER OF YEARS GROWING PEANUTS Q 54 Are you a full time or part time grower (Do you have a business outside of your farming operation)? (Check one) FULL TIME PART TIME Q 55 Did you own or rent the farm (s) on which you grew peanuts in 200? (Check all that apply). Acres OWNED FARM OWNED FARM Q 56 If you owned the farm(s) on which you grew peanuts, what was the type of ownership? (Check all that apply). YOURSELF OR FAMILY PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION OTHER (specify) Q 57 What is your highest level of formal education? (Check one). 2th grade or less High school graduate College (2yrs) College (4yrs) Masters Ph.D. degree 2
25 Is there anything else you would like to tell us about peanut production and the management of pests on peanuts? If so, please use the space below for that purpose. Your contribution to this survey is greatly appreciated. Please return the questionnaire in the stamped envelope provided. Published by North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 94. Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating. Funding for this project was provided by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No , "Management of the Southern IPM Center 20 22
26 Appendix B Peanut Growers Survey Data 23
27 Response of Peanut Growers to Survey Table B: Survey that Grew Peanuts Q Grow peanuts? respondents No 0 0 Yes The total number of respondents to the survey = 27 Table B2: Peanut Survey by County of Residence Q2 County No. planting peanuts Percent of Beaufort/Craven 3.7 Bertie Edgecomb 3.7 Gates Greene Jones 3.7 Martin 3. Perquimons Pitt Craven, Pitt, Beaufort 3.7 Wayne Wilson Total The total number of respondents to the survey = 27 24
28 Table B3: Acres of Peanuts Planted by Survey, By County Q3 County Acres Planted Percent of Planted Acres Average Acres by Respondent Beaufort/Craven Bertie Edgecomb Gates Greene Jones Martin perquimons Pitt Craven, Pitt, Beaufor Wayne Wilson Total Table B4: Acres of Peanuts Planted by Survey, By Variety Q4 Peanut Variety Number Planting Variety Acres of Variety Planted Acreage Planted by Bailey CHAMPS Gregory NC_V Perry Phillips Sugg VA98R 00.5 Florida_ GA_Green Total
29 Table B5: Acres of Peanuts Irrigated by Survey, By County Q5 County Acres Irrigated Times Irrigated Beaufort/Craven 0 0 Bertie 00 3 Edgecomb 0 0 Gates 60 8 Greene 0 0 Jones 0 0 Martin 0 0 perquimons 0 0 Pitt, Craven, Beaufort 60 Pitt Wayne 0 0 Wilson 0 0 Total 520 Table B6: Tillage Practices used in Growing 20 Peanuts Q6 Tillage Practice Acres under practice Percent of Planted acres Disk Chisel Moldbrd plow 05.5 Field cultivate Rip and Bed in spring Rip and Bed or Bed in Fall Bed in spring Strip till No till 0 0 Total The total number of acres planted = Percentages in this column will exceed 00 because growers were asked to list all the acres each equipment was used on and these equipment are not used exclusively 26
30 Table B7: who Planted a Cover Crop within their Peanut Crop Q7 (i) Plant Cover Crop No. planting peanuts No Yes Total The total number of respondents to the survey = 27 Table B8: Cover Crops Planted by Peanut Growers in 20 Q7 (ii) Cover Crop Planted respondents Percent of Rye 3.7 Wheat Wheat seed 3.7 Total The total number of respondents to the survey = 27 Table B9: Acres of Peanuts Harvested by Survey, By County County Acres Harvested Beaufort/Craven Bertie Edgecomb Gates Greene Jones Martin perquimons Pitt Pitt, Craven, Beaufor Wayne Wilson Total Q8 Percent of Harvested Acres Average Acres by Respondent 27
31 Table B0: Average Peanut Yields in 200 and 20 Q9 County Average Yield 200 Average Yield 20 Beaufort/Craven Bertie Edgecomb Gates Greene Jones Martin perquimons Pitt Craven, Pitt, Beaufort Wayne Wilson Total 27 Table : Other Crops Grown in Addition to Peanuts Q0 Other Crop Tobacco Cotton Corn Soybeans Sweet_potatoes 3. Wheat Beans Milo 3. Cucumber 3.7 Oats 3.7 Total The total number of respondents to the survey = 27. The percentage is greater than 00 because growers were to list all the cover crops they grew; several grew more than one cover crop 28
32 Table B2: who Used Pesticides to Manage Weeds, Insects, Mites, Nematodes and Diseases Q Used pesticides No 0 0 Yes The total number of respondents to the survey = 27 Table B3: Survey who Used Herbicides to Manage Grasses and Weeds Used herbicides No 0 0 Yes Q2 The total number of respondents to the survey = 27 29
33 Table B4: Survey that Used Herbicides on these Grasses and Broadleaf Weeds Q3 Grass or Weed Bermudagrass Brodleaf_signalgrass Crabgrass Fall_panicum 40.7 Foxtails Goosegrass 3. Johnsongrass 3. Nutsedge Texas_panicum Cocklebur 7 63 Palmer_amaranth Florida_beggarweed Jimsonweed Lambsquarters Morningglory Pigweed Prickly_sida Ragweed Sicklepod Spurred_anoda 3. Velvetleaf _Others 3.9 Missing = Total The total number of respondents to the survey = 27. The percentage is greater than 00 because growers were to list all the grasses they treated; several growers had multiple weed and grass problems 30
34 Table B5: Herbicides Applied as Pre plant Burn down Q4 Herbicide Acres Applied Planted Acres Dual or Dual Magnu Glyphosate Intrro Outlook Paraquat Prowl Pursuit Sonalan Strongarm Valor SX ,4 D Others Total The total number of acres planted = The percentage of acres applied with herbicides will be greater than 00 because growers applied more than one herbicide for pre plant burn down Table B6: Herbicides Used at Planting Q5 At Planting Herbicide Acres Applied Total Planted Acres Dual or Dual Magnum Intrro Outlook Pursuit Strongarm Valor SX Others Total The total number of acres planted = The percentage of acres applied with herbicides at planting is greater than 00 because growers applied more than one herbicide 3
35 Table B7: Herbicides Applied at cracking Q6 At Cracking Herbicide The total number of acres planted = The percentage of acres applied with herbicides at cracking is greater than 00 because growers applied more than one herbicide Table B8: Herbicides Applied at Emergence harvest Q7 Acres Applied Planted Acres Basagran Dual or Dual Magn Outlook Intrro Paraquat Pursuit Strongarm Others Total At Emergence harvest Herbicide Acres Applied Planted Acres Basagran Cadre Classic Clethodim Dual or Dual Magnum Intrro Paraquat Poast Pursuit Storm Ultra Blazer DB Others Total The total number of acres planted = The percentage of acres applied with herbicides at emergence harvest will be greater than 00 because growers applied more than one herbicide 32
36 Table 9: Who Used Insecticides to Manage Insects/Mites Used Insecticides Q8 The total number of survey respondents = 27 No 3.9 Yes Frequency Missing = Total Table 20: Insects/Mites on Which Insecticides were used Q9 Insect/Mite Controlled Aphids Corn_earworms Fall_armyworms Leafhoppers Southern corn_rootworms Spider_mites Thrips Wireworms Others 3.7 Total The total number of respondents to the survey = 27. The percentage is greater than 00 because growers were to list all the insects/mites on which they used insecticides Table 2: Insecticides Applied at Planting to Manage Insects Q20 Insecticide Applied The total number of acres planted = Acres Applied Acres Planted Di Syston Orthene or Acephate Temik(in furrow) Thimet or Phorate Total
37 Table 22: Insecticides Applied to Manage Early Season Insects Q2 Insecticide Applied The total number of acres planted = Acres Applied Acres Planted Baythrd XL Asana XL Karate Lannate Malathion Orthene or Acephate Sevin Total Insecticide Applied Table 23: Insecticides Applied to Manage Mid Season Insects The total number of acres planted = 6827 Q22 Acres Applied Acres planted Lorsban Mocap Thimet Total
38 Table 24: Insecticides Applied to Manage Late Season Insects/Mites Q23 Insecticide Applied respondents The total number of acres planted = 6827 Acres Applied Percent of total acres Planted Asana XL Bythroid Comite Diazinon Karate Z Lannate Lorsban Omite Orthene Sevin Steward Total Table 25: Who Used Fumigants to Manage Nematodes Q24 Used Fumigant / Nematicide The total number of survey respondents = 27 respondents Percent of No Yes Frequency Missing = Total
39 Table 26: Fumigants Applied Prior to Planting to manage Nematodes Q25 Fumigant Applied Number Acres Applied Percent of Acres Applied Percent of total Acres Planted Busan Metam Telone C Telone II UCB Vapam Others Total The total number of acres planted = 6827 Table 27: Nematicides Applied at Planting to Manage Nematodes Q26 Nematicide at Planting Number Acres Fertilized The total number of survey respondents = 27 Percent of Fertilized Acres Percent of Planted Acres Nemacur Temik Temik (in furrow) Total Table 28: Who Used Fungicides/Fumigants to Manage Diseases Fungicide / Fumigants used Q27 The total number of survey respondents = 27 respondents Percent of No 3.7 Yes Total
40 Table 29: Diseases on which Fungicides/Fumigants were used Q28 Disease respondents Percent of CBR (black root rot) Peanut leafspot Sclerotinia blight Stem rot 7 63 Rhizoctonia limb rot Others 3.7 Total The total number of survey respondents = 27. The percentage is greater than 00 because growers were to list all the diseases they treated Table 30: Fungicides Applied in Seed Furrow at Planting Q29 Fungicide Applied Number Acres Applied Percent of Planted Acres Proline Fungicide Applied Table 3: Fungicides Applied to Manage Peanut Leaf spot Q30 Acres Applied Percent of Total Planted Acres Benlate Chlorothanlonil Copper Dithane Convoy Endura Erito Headline Provost Stratego Other Total The total number of planted acres = Percentage greater than 00 because growers managed leaf spot with more than one fungicide 37
41 Table 32: Use of Leaf spot Advisory to Time Leaf spot Fungicide Applications Used leafspot advisory Q3 Percent of No response 3.7 All of the time Most of the time 3. Some of the time 0 37 Never Leafspot advisory not available 0 0 Not aware of leafspot advisory Total The total number of survey respondents = 27 Table 33: Use of Sclerotinia Advisory to Time Sclerotinia Fungicide Applications Used Sclerotinia advisory Q32 Total The total number of survey respondents = 27 Table 34: Fumigants Applied to control CBR (Black root rot) The total number of planted acres =6827 Q33 Percent of No response 3.7 All of the time 3.7 Most of the time 3. Some of the time Never Sclerotinia blight advisory not avail 3.7 Not aware of Sclerotinia blight advis Fumigant Acres Applied Acres Busan Metam Vapam Others Total
42 Table 35: Fungicides to Manage Stem Rot, Sclerotinia Blight or Rhizoctonia Limb Rot Q34 Percent of Fungicide Applied Acres Applied Total Acres Planted Artisan 75. Endura 00.5 Headline Lorsban Omega Proline Provost Tebuconxl Others Total The total number of planted acres =6827. The percentage is greater than 00 because growers were to list all the fungicides they used Table 36: Growth Regulators / Stimulants Applied to Peanuts in 20 Q35 Fungicide Applied Number Acres Applied Planted Acres Apogee The total number of planted acres = 6827 Table 37: Fertilizers Applied to Peanuts in 200 Q36 Fetilizer Applied Number Acres Applied Planted acres Boron Calcium Sulphate Manganese Pre plant fertilizer Others Total The total number of planted acres = The percentage is greater than 00 because growers were to list all the fertilizers they applied 39
43 Table 38: Inoculants Applied to Promote Nitrogen Fixation Q37 Inoculant Applied Acres treated Percent of Planted acres In furrow liquid In furrow granular Applied in hopper with seed Total The total number of planted acres = 6827 Table 39: Agrochemicals Applied at the Same Time Q38 Did Applications Average Chemicals Chemicals in Work as Tank >5 Applications expected? Yes Yes Yes Yes > respondents making, 2,, >5 applications Practice IPM? Table 40: who Practiced IPM in Growing Peanuts Q39 The total number of survey respondents = 27 No Yes Total
44 Table 4: Considered IPM Good or Risky Pest Management Practice Q40 Is IPM good or risky Risky Good Total The total number of survey respondents = 27 Table 42: Growers who Rotated Fields Planted with Peanuts Q4 (i) Rotate field No 3.7 Yes Total The total number of survey respondents = 27 Table 43: Crops Rotated with Peanuts Q4 (ii) Rotating Crop cotton corn tobacco sweet_potatoes 3. wheat soybeans 3. Milo 3.7 Beans Total The total number of survey respondents = 27. The percentage of respondents is greater than 00 because growers were to list all the crops they grew in rotation with peanuts 4
Production and Pest Management Practices Used on the 2011 Peanut Crop
Production and Pest Management Practices Used on the 2011 Peanut Crop This survey is one of a series conducted by the Cooperative Extension Service to determine pest management practices used on agricultural
More informationKNOWING YOUR FIELD A Guide to On-Farm Testing for Peanut Growers
A Guide to On-Farm Testing for Peanut Growers KNOWING YOUR FIELD A Guide to On-Farm Testing for Peanut Growers To maximize profit when growing peanuts, farmers rely on recommendations for variety selection,
More informationChallenges to Producing Peanuts Using the Organic Approach
Challenges to Producing Peanuts Using the Organic Approach David Jordan, Crop and Soil Sciences North Carolina State University 919-515-4068 david_jordan@ncsu.edu I bet you could sell every pound of organic
More informationMID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER
MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY AREAS 2015 Copyright 2015 The American Society of Agronomy MID-ATLANTIC CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER (CCA)
More informationMID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER
MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY AREAS April 2010 MID-ATLANTIC CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER (CCA) PROGRAM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INTEGRATED
More informationRelative Ranking and Risk to Sustainability of Pest Management Tools in the Virginia- Carolina Region of the United States
1 Relative Ranking and Risk to Sustainability of Pest Management Tools in the Virginia- Carolina Region of the United States D. L. Jordan 1, R. L. Brandenburg 2, B. B. Shew 2, D. Anco 3, M. Marshall 3,
More informationBertie County Ag News
North Carolina Cooperative Extension August 2016 Bertie County Ag News William (Billy) Barrow, Jr. County Extension Director Contact Us For more information regarding any of your farming needs, please
More informationA View of Peanut Production from the Old North State. David Jordan North Carolina State University Raleigh
A View of Peanut Production from the Old North State David Jordan North Carolina State University Raleigh 2016 A year of extremes June and July good weather Not so good in August Extremes dry and wet October
More information11. RISK OF PESTS IN PEANUT, INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT, AND PESTICIDE STEWARDSHIP
11. RISK OF PESTS IN PEANUT, INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT, AND PESTICIDE STEWARDSHIP David L. Jordan Extension Specialist Crop and Soil Sciences Barbara B. Shew Extension Specialist Plant Pathology and Entomology
More informationPeanut Thoughts from North of the Border. David Jordan, Crop and Soil Sciences North Carolina State University
Peanut Thoughts from North of the Border David Jordan, Crop and Soil Sciences North Carolina State University Information and Updates Peanut Notes Peanut Information Series Field days County production
More informationCucumbers (Pickles and Slicers) IPM Element Revised March, 2012
Cucumbers (Pickles and Slicers) IPM Element Revised March, 2012 Edited by Jim Jasinski Contributing Authors: Celeste Welty (Entomology); Bob Precheur, Mark Bennett, Doug Doohan (Horticulture & Crop Science);
More informationSoybean IPM Elements Revised March, 2012
Soybean IPM Elements Revised March, 2012 Edited by Jim Jasinski Contributing Authors: Ron Hammond, Andy Michels (Entomology); Mark Loux, Mark Sulc, Peter Thomison (Horticulture & Crop Science); Robert
More informationDamage Thresholds. Section 8
Damage Thresholds Section 8 Relative yield Hypothetical yield of crop as affected by length of early season weed control 100 80 60 40 20 Yield loss No yield loss 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Weeks of
More informationEVALUATION OF MICHIGAN SUGARBEET ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM. March 2001
EVALUATION OF MICHIGAN SUGARBEET ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM March 2001 An evaluative study conducted in cooperation with Michigan State University Extension The Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station The Michigan
More informationAgricultural Update. April 2013 UPCOMING EVENTS WHEAT STRIPE ALERT & CEREAL LEAF BEETLE
Craven County Center North Carolina Cooperative Extension 300 Industrial Drive New Bern, North Carolina 28562 252-633-1477 Phone 252-633-2120 Fax In this Issue.. Upcoming Events Wheat Stripe Alert Cereal
More informationGood Agricultural Practices for Producing a High Quality Peanut Product
Good Agricultural Practices for Producing a High Quality Peanut Product John P. Beasley, Jr. Professor and Extension Peanut Agronomist Crop and Soil Sciences Department University of Georgia 2009 Georgia
More informationFORAGE Perennial Grasses Followed by Corn or Other Grass Crops...2. PEANUTS Expanded Peanut Production...2 Inoculants for Peanuts...
AGRONOMY NOTES January, 2005 IN THIS ISSUE CORN Corn Seed Supplies...2 COTTON Cotton Use and Export in the U.S....2 FORAGE Perennial Grasses Followed by Corn or Other Grass Crops...2 PEANUTS Expanded Peanut
More informationIPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests
The University of Tennessee IPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests West TN Experiment Station 605 Airway Boulevard Jackson, TN 38301 No. 2 March 18, 2005 Past Newsletters and other information
More informationHow old are you? (1530 responses) 2009 Private Applicator Certification Program years years
2009 Private Applicator Certification Program IPM Assessment (Turning Point Data) Pesticide Safety & Environmental Education Program Fritz Breitenbach, IPM Specialist Lisa Behnken, Ryan Miller, Liz Stahl,
More informationB Suggestions for Weed Control in Peanuts
B-6010 04-01 Suggestions for Weed Control in Peanuts Suggestions for Weed Control in Peanuts Dr. Paul A. Baumann, Extension Weed Specialist Dr. Robert G. Lemon, Extension Agronomist - Peanuts Texas Agricultural
More informationThe University of Georgia Cooperative Extension College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences March 9, 2009 www.ugacotton.com Cotton Burndown 1 Understanding the Proper Methods When Applying Valor
More informationManaging Pesticide Resistance
Kentucky Pesticide Education Program copyright 2016 University of Kentucky Department of Entomology Managing Pesticide Resistance Pesticide resistance presents an increasing challenge to growers. A resistant
More informationIPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests
The University of Tennessee IPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests West TN Research and Education Center 605 Airways Boulevard Jackson, TN 38301 No. 1 February 13, 2009 Past newsletters
More informationPrepared by Clyde R. Weathers, Extension Farm Management Specialist Published by THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE North Carolina Stat
Summary of the Farmers Pest Management Services Project in Chowan, Perquimans and Pasquotank Counties 1 979-1 980 north carolina AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE Prepared by Clyde R. Weathers, Extension
More informationField Corn IPM Elements Revised March, 2012
Field Corn IPM Elements Revised March, 2012 Edited by Jim Jasinski Contributing Authors: Ron Hammond, Andy Michels (Entomology); Mark Loux, Mark Sulc, Peter Thomison (Horticulture & Crop Science); Robert
More information10/22/2008. AGRN 1003/1004 Dr. Weaver
AGRN 1003/1004 Dr. Weaver Weeds Disease pathogens (fungi, bacteria, viruses, nematodes) Insects and related organisms Birds Mammals (deer, rabbits, rodents) Discussion of specific pest problems will occur
More informationPoultry production is the number one agricultural
The Value of Poultry Litter in South Georgia Claudia S. Dunkley, Extension Poultry Scientist, Department of Poultry Science Dan L. Cunningham, Extension Poultry Scientist, Department of Poultry Science
More informationCotton Herbicide Performance
Cotton Herbicide Performance GRASSES AND NUTSEDGE Key: P=Less than 65% F=65-79% G=80-89% E=90% or better TOLERANCE BARNYARDGRASS BERMUDAGRASS B.L. SIGNALGRASS CRABGRASS F. PANICUM FOXTAILS GOOSEGRASS SEEDLING
More informationTechnology and Agriculture: History and Future
Technology and Agriculture: History and Future DISCUSSION QUESTIONS What were the most predominant crops in Ohio 100 years ago (1917)? What are the most predominant three crops in Ohio today? Why did these
More informationPeanut Weed Control Update Eric P. Prostko, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil Sciences
Peanut Weed Control Update - 2014 Eric P. Prostko, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil Sciences Topics Valor Paraquat Classic Palmer amaranth Sicklepod T. spiderwort
More informationCONSERVATION TILLAGE IN GEORGIA COTTON PRODUCTION: RESULTS OF A 2005 SURVEY
CONSERVATION TILLAGE IN GEORGIA COTTON PRODUCTION: RESULTS OF A 2005 SURVEY W. Don Shurley Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia, Tifton Introduction In 1983, Georgia cotton
More informationWheat IPM Elements Revised March, 2012
Wheat IPM Elements Revised March, 2012 Edited by Jim Jasinski Contributing Authors: Ron Hammond, Andy Michels (Entomology); Mark Loux, Mark Sulc, Peter Thomison (Horticulture & Crop Science); Robert Mullen
More informationGreen Bean Production and Management
WISCONSIN VEGETABLE SUSTAINABILITY GREEN/SNAP BEAN SPECIFIC PROTOCOL - DRAFT 1/25/2012 Developed by the Wisconsin Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, University of Wisconsin - Madison Note: To determine
More informationEBB2 Po Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Shepody Commercial Potatoes: Fumigation and No Storage District II
EBB2 Po2 07 2007 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Shepody Commercial Potatoes: Fumigation and No Storage Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions District II The University
More informationSURVEY OF WEED CONTROL AND PRODUCTION PRACTICES ON SUGARBEET IN WESTERN NORTH DAKOTA AND EASTERN MONTANA IN 2015
SURVEY OF WEED CONTROL AND PRODUCTION PRACTICES ON SUGARBEET IN WESTERN NORTH DAKOTA AND EASTERN MONTANA IN 2015 Andrew Lueck 1, Thomas J. Peters 2, Mohamed F.R. Khan 2, and Mark A. Boetel 3 1 Sugarbeet
More informationAGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES
AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES http://agalternatives.aers.psu.edu Snap Bean Production Snap beans are a vegetable crop in the legume family that lend themselves well to small-scale and part-time farming operations.
More informationProduction, Pests, Profitability Neighborhood On-Farm Education for Field Corn and Alfalfa
Production, Pests, Profitability Neighborhood On-Farm Education for Field Corn and Alfalfa The Pest, Production and Profit (Triple P) program was completed and was very successful! This intensive, on-farm
More informationTIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources
PLANT PATHOLOGY SERIES TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources EXTENSION PLANT PATHOLOGY, 961 S. DONAHUE DRIVE, AUBURN UNIVERSITY, AL 36849-5624 May 24, 2011 PP-698 2011 Peanut Disease Risk
More informationWeed Management in Transgenic, Herbicide-Resistant Soybeans 1
SS-AGR-11 Weed Management in Transgenic, Herbicide-Resistant Soybeans 1 J.A. Ferrell, G. E. MacDonald, B. J. Brecke, and J. Tredaway Ducar 2 Transgenic or herbicide-resistant soybeans are genetically altered
More informationJarette s Farm Journal
Jarette s Farm Journal Jarette Hurry October 2017 Contact Us For more information regarding any of your farming needs, please feel free to contact the Bertie County Cooperative Extension Office at 794-5317.
More informationPeanut Variety Performance in Florida,
SS AGR 311 Peanut Variety Performance in Florida, 2004-2007 1 Barry Tillman, Dan Gorbet, Mark Gomillion, Justin McKinney, George Person, and Bill Thomas 2 Variety choice is a critical management decision
More informationFLEXIBILITY TO SPRAY CORN FROM PREPLANT TO POSTEMERGENCE
FLEXIBILITY TO SPRAY CORN FROM PREPLANT TO POSTEMERGENCE Solutions for the Growing World SURESTART II HERBICIDE WIDE APPLICATION WINDOW Preplant Preemergence Early Postemergence Up to 11-inch Corn APPLICATION
More informationObjective 1: Meetings and Multi-State Alliance/Pest Management Center Coordination
Prairie States Pest Management Alliance to Support the North Central Region Pest Management Center Missouri Final Report for 2001 George Smith, Missouri Department of Agriculture Funds Granted: $59,679
More informationProduction of Ultra Narrow Row Cotton 1
SS-AGR-83 1 D. L. Wright, J. J. Marois, and R. K. Sprenkel 2 Shorter season cotton varieties have allowed growers to start harvesting cotton sooner with fewer problems with hardlocked cotton bolls. Stripper
More informationBob Pearce, David Ditsch, Jack Zeleznik, and Wade Turner
Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002 Burn Down Management of Winter Cereal Cover Crops for No-tillage Burley Tobacco Production Bob Pearce, David Ditsch, Jack Zeleznik, and Wade Turner INTRODUCTION Recent developments
More informationPLANT PATHOLOGY SERIES TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources
PLNT PTHOLOGY SERIES TIMELY INFORMTION griculture & Natural Resources EXTENSION PLNT PTHOLOGY, S. DONHUE DRIVE, UURN UNIVERSITY, L - July, PP- Impact of Cropping Sequence on Diseases, Nematodes, and Yield
More informationUse of Telone II and Temik 15G to Improve Yields and Returns of Cotton Grown in Northwest Florida Fields Infested with Root-Knot Nematodes 1
FE318 Use of Telone II and Temik 15G to Improve Yields and Returns of Cotton Grown in Northwest Florida Fields Infested with Root-Knot Nematodes 1 D.J. Zimet, J.L. Smith, R.A. Kinloch, J.R. Rich, and T.D.
More informationOverview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques
Overview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques David Wright, Jim Marois, Duli Zhao, and Cheryl Mackowiak IFAS-North Florida Research and Education Center University of Florida, Quincy,
More informationWeed Control in Vine Crops: Consider All Your Options. Mark VanGessel, Barb Scott, and Quintin Johnson
Weed Control in Vine Crops: Consider All Your Options Mark VanGessel, Barb Scott, and Quintin Johnson Topics Pumpkins with rye cover crops Watermelon Plastic culture Application timing for row middles
More informationPeanut Research at OSU 2002
Partners in P artners E A N U T in S P artners in Peanut Research at OSU 2002 Supported by the Oklahoma Peanut Commission National Peanut Board Oklahoma State University Division of Agricultural Sciences
More informationMINIMIZING DISEASES OF PEANUT IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES. The 2016 Version of the Peanut Disease Risk Index
The Spotted Wilt Index and the Peanut Fungal Disease Risk Index were successfully combined in 2005 to produce the Peanut Disease Risk Index for peanut producers in thesoutheastern MINIMIZING DISEASES OF
More informationEco-Label Opportunities for Processing Vegetable Crops. W. R. Stevenson J. A. Wyman P. Rogers L. Granadino
Eco-Label Opportunities for Processing Vegetable Crops W. R. Stevenson J. A. Wyman P. Rogers L. Granadino Goals of Eco-Labeling Project Increased adoption of advanced IPM technology pest tolerant cultivars
More informationWEED CONTROL IN NO-TILL SOYBEANS. W. M. Lewis
WEED CONTROL IN NO-TILL SOYBEANS W. M. Lewis Weed control in no- till planted soybeans is almost completely denendent upon herbicides. no-till soybeans are most commonly planted as a doublecrop following
More informationTABLE 7A Weed Response to Herbicides in Sugar Beets*
TABLE 7A Weed Response to Herbicides in Sugar Beets* ANNUAL BROADLEAVES ANNUAL GRASSES PERENNIALS SITE OF ACTION CROP RESPONSE** COCKLEBUR JIMSONWEED LAMBSQUARTERS NIGHTSHADE (BLACK) PIGWEED RAGWEED (COMMON)
More informationFUNGICIDE & INSECTICIDE ON SOYBEANS
FUNGICIDE & INSECTICIDE ON SOYBEANS Presented by: Anthony Martin & Brett McArtor Northeast Field Agronomist Southeast Field Agronomist Overview What is IPM Fungicide and Insecticide resistance Review of
More informationH O T, H O T, H O T! Newsletter for the Southern Piedmont of North Carolina
Newsletter for the Southern Piedmont of North Carolina Volume 1, Issue 5, July 2008 Inside This Issue Wheat Variety Test Results/ Multiple Yr Avg. Featured Element-Boron(B) Grasshoppers in Soybeans Featured
More informationInsecticide Applications on Minnesota s 2016 Soybean Acres
Insecticide Applications on Minnesota s 2016 Soybean Acres Minnesota Department of Agriculture 625 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55155-2538 651-201-6000 1-800-967-AGRI www.mda.state.mn.us In accordance
More informationSOYBEANS. August 2009
Field Crop Newsletter August 2009 SOYBEANS Melissa J. Evans Extension Agent, Agriculture Field Crops Contact Us: NCCE-Onslow County 4024 Richlands Hwy. Jacksonville, NC 28540 (910) 455-5873 (910) 455-0977
More informationGlyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth Initial concerns in 2005
Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth Initial concerns in 2005 Untreated Glyphosate 0.75 lb ae/a 12 inches at treatment 14 DAT Parkton, NC 2005 Untreated Glyphosate 3.0 lb ae/a 14 DAT Parkton, NC 2005 290
More informationPEAnut InSECt COntROl
Insect Insecticide Formulation/Acre lb ai/acre Acres/Gallon /Comments thrips acephate 0.35-0.5 DO NOT graze or feed vines treated with Treat with foliar Orthene 9 6- oz Orthene. insecticides when 0.0-0.05
More informationSyngenta delivers grower value in sunflowers
Syngenta delivers grower value in sunflowers At Syngenta, we are proud to support the sunflower industry. To help growers meet increasing demand and capitalize on market opportunities, we continue to invest
More informationWEED MANAGEMENT. DEVELOPMENT STAGES Most crop plants and weeds have four stages of development: LEARNING OBJECTIVES
C 6 H A P TE R WEED MANAGEMENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES After completely studying this chapter, you should: Be able to define a weed and its four stages of development. Understand the differences between annual,
More information2015 WEED MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND INCENTIVES
MIDSOUTH AND SOUTHEAST CLEAN FIELDS 2015 WEED MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND INCENTIVES CLEAN FIELDS ADD UP TO STRONG YIELDS How it Works: Soybeans and Corn PLANT Genuity Roundup Ready 2 Yield soybeans,
More informationPlanning for Weed Management in Vegetables
Planning for Weed Management in Vegetables Presented at Indiana Horticultural Congress January 30, 2007 Steve Weller and Liz Maynard Dept. of Horticulture and LA Purdue University weller@purdue.edu emaynard@purdue.edu
More informationPest Management in Silage Crops
Pest Management in Silage Crops From planting to harvesting MARCELO WALLAU & KEVIN KORUS Assistant professor Forage extension specialist University of Florida - Agronomy Dr. Plant Health, Ag and Natural
More informationCraig H. Canaday, Jim E. Wyatt, and Don D. Tyler. Interpretative Summary
Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato, West Tennessee Experiment Station, 2000 Craig H. Canaday, Jim E. Wyatt, and Don D. Tyler
More informationIPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests
The University of Tennessee IPM NEWSLETTER Update for Field Crops and Their Pests West TN Research and Education Center 605 Airways Boulevard Jackson, TN 38301 No. 22 August 28, 2009 Past newsletters and
More information2015 WEED MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND INCENTIVES
MIDSOUTH AND SOUTHEAST CLEAN FIELDS 2015 WEED MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND INCENTIVES CLEAN FIELDS ADD UP TO STRONG YIELDS How it Works: Soybeans and Corn PLANT Genuity Roundup Ready 2 Yield Soybeans,
More informationA Survey of Southern New Mexico Chile Producers
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business A Survey of Southern New Mexico Chile Producers Production Practices and Problems To find more resources for your business, home, or family,
More informationCERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES FOR THE SOUTHEAST ALABAMA-FLORIDA-GEORGIA-SOUTH CAROLINA. August, 2016
CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES FOR THE SOUTHEAST ALABAMA-FLORIDA-GEORGIA-SOUTH CAROLINA August, 2016 Copyright 2016 The American Society of Agronomy FOREWORD Performance Objectives for the
More informationHerbicide Injury on Crop Caused by Excessive Rainfall Steve Li. Extension Specialist, Assistant Professor. Auburn University
Herbicide Injury on Crop Caused by Excessive Rainfall Steve Li. Extension Specialist, Assistant Professor. Auburn University June 6, 2017 In the last several weeks since the start of May, we had too much
More informationCrop Profile for Corn in Oregon
Prepared October, 2000 Crop Profile for Corn in Oregon General Production Information Oregon is the fourth-ranking producer of sweet corn for processing in the United States. In 1998, this represented
More informationAgronomy Notes. Features: April-August Weed Science: Crop Science: Miscellaneous:
Agronomy Notes April-August 2015 Features: Weed Science: Cadre + Select Tank-Mixes...2 Crop Oil Adjuvants: 1% v/v or 1 qt/a?...3 Mid-season Morningglory Control in Peanuts 4 Crop Science: Natural Reseeding
More information2014 Weed Control Tactics Alabama Vegetable Conference. Stanley Culpepper UGA Tifton Campus
2014 Weed Control Tactics Alabama Vegetable Conference Stanley Culpepper UGA Tifton Campus Weed Control Responsibilities Weed Management At Its Best Herbicide/ Fumigant Agronomic Weed Control Herbicide
More informationGRAIN SORGHUM. Preemergence
68 Grain Sorghum GRAIN SGHUM See page 22 for PRECAUTIONS on use of atrazine containing products near ground and surface water. See comments in the corn section for detailed information on each of the herbicides
More information2. Where do you work?
BMSB Impact Survey First year of longitudinal study on the impact of the Brown Marmorated stink bug 4 key states, VA, PA, MD and NJ 26 sites (Grower and commodity meetings) Economic, societal, and educational
More informationEBB2 On Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Spanish Yellow Onions District II
EBB2 On 07 2007 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Spanish Yellow Onions Mike Thornton, Lynn Jensen, Paul E. Patterson, and Neil R. Rimbey Background and
More informationPOTATO IPM PROTOCOL for PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
POTATO IPM PROTOCOL for PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Integrated Pest Management (IPM): A knowledge-based, decision-making process that uses all available techniques (Chemical, Cultural, and Biological) to suppress
More informationManaging Herbicide-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Pigweed) In Field Corn, Grain Sorghum, Peanut, and Soybean
Managing Herbicide-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Pigweed) In Field Corn, Grain Sorghum, Peanut, and Soybean - 2014 Eric P. Prostko, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil
More informationPermanent Pastures For Delaware
Revision Date: 9/1/1998 Richard Barczewski, PhD Animal Scientist Richard W Taylor, PhD Extension Specialist III AF-10 Permanent Pastures For Delaware Pasture, like any other crop, must be properly managed
More informationEQIP application information by state
IPM Plan Guide Sheet Practices for Field Crop Production Introduction This tool has been designed as a guide for evaluating on-farm pest management practices for farmers interested in a Natural Resource
More informationMississippi Sweetpotato News
Mississippi Sweetpotato News Summer 2013 Mississippi Sweetpotato Crop Report (7-31-2013) Benny Graves, Executive Director Mississippi Sweet Potato Council Well it is the beginning of August and the Mississippi
More information2016 SOYBEAN PRODUCTION AND MOST EFFICIENT YIELD CONTESTS FOR NORTH CAROLINA (Rules and Regulations)
2016 SOYBEAN PRODUCTION AND MOST EFFICIENT YIELD CONTESTS FOR NORTH CAROLINA (Rules and Regulations) PURPOSES. The purposes of the N. C. Soybean Production and Most Efficient Yield (MEY) Contests are to
More informationBEFORE USING ANY PESTICIDE STOP READ THE LABEL I Prepared by Furney A. Todd, Extension Professor of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University at
CONTROL BLACK IN BU RLEY / TOBACCO BEFORE USING ANY PESTICIDE STOP READ THE LABEL I Prepared by Furney A. Todd, Extension Professor of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University at Raleigh and the
More informationMID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER
MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT COMPETENCY AREAS Revised March 2006 MID-ATLANTIC CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER (CCA) PROGRAM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
More informationIn 2000 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 4-8, San Antonio, Texas, pp
In 2000 Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 4-8, San Antonio, Texas, pp. 76-79 VALUE OF BT AND HERBICIDE-RESISTANT COTTONS Janet E. Carpenter and Leonard P. Gianessi National Center for Food
More informationRevised 2009 Publication
www.ext.vt.edu Revised 2009 Publication 2810-1017 Produced by Communications and Marketing, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2009 Virginia
More informationRAISE YOUR EXPECTATIONS OF WHAT AN ACRE CAN DO.
RAISE YOUR EXPECTATIONS OF WHAT AN ACRE CAN DO. Corn and Soybean Solutions Guide Corn Donald Tragger Grand Ridge, Illinois About four years ago, we started spraying Headline on all of our acres. We did
More informationEastern Region FFA Agronomy Career Development Event
Eastern Region FFA Agronomy Career Development Event Purpose To create interest and promote understanding in agronomy and crop management by providing opportunities for recognition through the demonstration
More informationWeed Management in Tree Fruit Residual herbicides Non-residual herbicides Selective Nonselective
Weed Management in Tree Fruit Bradley A. Majek majek@aesop.rutgers.edu Rutgers Agricultural Research & Extension Center 121 Northville Road, Bridgeton, NJ 08302 A good orchard floor management program
More informationArchival copy: for current recommendations see or your local extension office.
Fact Sheet RF-AA006 Vegetable Crops 1 George Hochmuth 2 VEGETABLE CROPS SERVICE PROGRAMS Non-parasitic Disorders Clinics for Vegetable Crops This service diagnoses disorders (other than parasitic diseases,
More informationSoybean Herbicide Performance
Soybean Herbicide Performance GRASSES AND NUTSEDGE Key: P=Less than 65% F=65-79% G=80-90% E=90% or better For weed control, apply the symbols to the percentage of infestation controlled. For crop tolerance,
More informationMINIMIZING DISEASES OF PEANUT IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES. The 2015 Version of the Peanut Disease Risk Index (Peanut Rx)
MINIMIZING DISEASES OF PEANUT IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES The 2015 Version of the Peanut Disease Risk Index (Peanut Rx) Robert Kemerait, Albert Culbreath, Eric Prostko, Tim Brenneman, Nathan Smith,
More informationTABLE 5A Weed Response to Herbicides in Dry Edible Beans*
TABLE 5A Weed Response to Herbicides in Dry Edible Beans* ANNUAL BROADLEAVES ANNUAL GRASSES PERENNIALS SITE OF ACTION CROP TOLERANCE** COCKLEBUR JIMSONWEED LAMBSQUARTERS NIGHTSHADE (E. BLACK) PIGWEED RAGWEED
More information2018 SOYBEAN PRODUCTION AND MOST EFFICIENT YIELD CONTESTS FOR NORTH CAROLINA (Rules and Regulations)
2018 SOYBEAN PRODUCTION AND MOST EFFICIENT YIELD CONTESTS FOR NORTH CAROLINA (Rules and Regulations) PURPOSE. The purpose of the N. C. Soybean Production and Most Efficient Yield (MEY) Contests are to
More informationEffects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato
Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato Craig H. Canaday, Jim E. Wyatt, and Don D. Tyler Interpretative Summary The effects of
More informationFIELD CROPS NEWSLETTER
FIELD CROPS NEWSLETTER December/January 2014 Melissa E. Huffman Extension Agent, Agriculture Field Crops Contact Us: NCCE-Onslow County 4024 Richlands Hwy. Jacksonville, NC 28540 (910) 455-5873 (910) 455-0977
More informationWEED CONTROL IN CHICKPEA PRODUCTION
WEED CONTROL IN CHICKPEA PRODUCTION 2017 Far West Winter Conference Matt Renfrow 208 310 0309 matt.renfrow@basf.com US Chickpea Production 600000 500000 400000 2015 207,500 acres 2016 320,000 acres 2017
More informationWEED CONTROL IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO Charles S. Johnson, Extension Plant Pathologist, Tobacco Good weed control uses crop rotation, early root and
WEED CONTROL IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO Charles S. Johnson, Extension Plant Pathologist, Tobacco Good weed control uses crop rotation, early root and stalk destruction, cultivation, and appropriate use of herbicides.
More informationU.S. California Crop Percent Percent Cotton Corn Soybeans 68 Canola 55
Integrating Weed Management Tools in Cotton and Corn: GMO s and Conventional Herbicides Steve Wright and Ron Vargas University of California Cooperative Extension, Tulare and Madera Integrating herbicide
More information