Chapter Thirteen: THROUGHPUT AND NEAR OPTIMUM CONVERSION
|
|
- Tracey Sullivan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter Thirteen: THROUGHPUT AND NEAR OPTIMUM CONVERSION Don Jones, Chris Hurt, and Jeffrey Hale Introduction This chapter has three objectives. The first is to examine the importance of getting maximum production through a system. The second is to look at the impact on the costs of production to move the 150 sow operation to an intensively managed SEW operation with a weekly farrowing schedule. As such, this system is a near optimum conversion which enables it to incorporate the technology, to gain maximum throughput, and to overcome as many disadvantages of size as possible. Since this system is near an optimum conversion, exploring the impact on costs compared to the 1200 sow system is valuable. The optimum conversion involves major changes. Since many producers will not be able to make the full conversion, the third part of this chapter explores ways to intensify the farrowing schedules to incorporate SEW when an off-site nursery is considered. These stepwise alternatives take the existing 150 sow operation from production of about 2,200 hogs per year up to over 7,000 hogs, and the conversions are made within the existing building systems. Importance of Throughput A quick analysis of the production systems presented in Chapters Three through Six reveals a drastically higher cost of production for the 150 sow low technology system. One of the key reasons for this disparity is the intensity of fixed facility utilization. As an example, in the 150 sow low technology system, the number of market hogs produced annually per thousand dollars of building and equipment investment is 5.5. This compares to for the 1200 sow system. There are a number of items in the costs structure which are largely fixed. These often include the investments in the feed mill and portions of the buildings and equipment. In addition, investments in the breeding stock feed, breeding herd medication, and breeding herd labor are largely fixed. Another large fixed investment is management time. Since many of these costs are fixed, as output increases, the total cost for these items does not rise, and therefore, the costs per hundredweight drops. As an example, in the 1200 sow system pigs are marketed per litter, compared to only in the 150 low technology system. The extra pigs require very little extra effort for management, or extra sow or boar feed, and thus spread these fixed costs over more units of output. The importance of spreading fixed costs over more units of output is among the most critical steps in lowering cost per hundredweight. This point can be illustrated by looking more closely at the systems outlined in this book. Table 13-1 shows the costs per hundredweight for 164
2 some of the key costs items that have some fixed components. These include the breeding herd inventory costs, some of the buildings and equipment, and portions of the labor and management. The differences in these items are dramatic. The total costs per hundredweight for these items in the 1200 sow system are $11.75 per hundredweight, but $21.78 per hundredweight for the 150 sow low technology system, or a $10.03 per hundredweight difference. Assuming that 30% of the costs in these categories were fixed, this means that the impact of fixed costs spreading would be $3.09 per hundredweight, or $7.57 per head as shown on the last line of Table Table 13-1: Estimated Impact of Greater Throughput in Pork Systems ($/cwt.) 1200 Sow 600 Sow 300 Sow 150 Sow 150 Sow High Tech. Low Tech. Breeding Inventory Buildings/Equipment Labor/Management TOTAL (these items) $11.75 $13.21 $14.77 $16.67 $21.78 Difference to 1200 Sow Assume 30% is Fixed $/Head Impact of Fixed Cost +$1.08 +$2.23 +$3.63 +$7.57 While all of the concepts explored in this book are important, most producers have to start with a set of existing buildings and equipment. For this reason this chapter will examine ways to convert a common existing 150 sow system to a near optimum system as well as demonstrate some step-by-step ways to make these conversions for those who may not choose to make the full conversions. Near Optimum Conversion To determine the possible economic ramifications of converting the 7x/year system into a weekly farrowing unit, a production model is presented. The model explores the conversion of the cooperative nursery, Segregated Early Weaning model, presented in Chapter 10, to a weekly farrowing unit with the market hogs moved off-site to a cooperative nursery and on to a cooperative finisher. Central to the weekly model is the idea of several smaller producers banding together in converting their existing farrow-to-finish units to farrowing only and to an accelerated weekly pigflow. A network is required to construct and manage a cooperative nursery. And a cooperative finishing operation is required to handle the increased number of pigs produced on each farm and to produce large enough groups of pigs to take advantage of cost savings from genetic improvement, split-sex feeding, phase feeding, marketing clout, etc. 165
3 The conversion from Far Nur Finishing Farrowing G estation farrow-to-finish to (75% of space needed) farrowing/breeding/gestation Breed - Gest Breeding only involves: converting (35% of space needed) existing nursery space to additional farrowing space, Figure 13-1 converting existing finishing space to gestation, and continuing to utilize the old breeding/gestation space for breeding. Sow numbers increase from 135 to about 360. However, note that this system would result in a significant amount of unused space in the old gestation unit. This conversion is depicted graphically in Figure The economic impacts of this conversion are dramatic. The costs of production for the 150 sow low technology system incorporating SEW were $43-44, but are dropped to $35.77 with this conversion. The costs savings come from the greater throughput, from better labor efficiency, and from production efficiencies obtained by incorporating all of the technology. The budget for this alternative is shown as follows. With similar genetics used in the sow herds on all farrowing farms, pigs could be sold (transferred) to the cooperative nursery on a weekly basis and then either finished at a cooperative site, sold (transferred) back to the original farrowing farm, or sold as feeders, (Figure 13-2). (Returning them to the original farm site would require construction of new gestation facilities, and would not be as desirable from the standpoint of separation from the sow herd.) With weekly schedules, a consistent number of pigs of the same age would be moved to the nursery each week so that a large group of nursery pigs could be housed in a common room. A weekly farrowing system would have the added advantage of producing a large number of uniform animals ready to leave the nursery each week, permitting the producer who purchases pigs to use their own finishing unit as an All-In/All-Out facility, buying enough pigs to fill all pens at one time so that all pigs in the unit would be of the same age. Larger groups of more uniform pigs result in cost savings through the use of phase feeding and spit-sex feeding. It would also allow marketing a much larger group of pigs at one time and enable finishing to be emptied and cleaned before purchasing additional nursery pigs. 166
4 Table 13-2: Cost of Production for Accelerated Throughput Item Unit Quantity Price Value/ltr Value/cw Value/hd t Direct Charges: Corn bu Soybean Meal ton Other Feed cwt TOTAL FEED Herd Health dol Fuel & Utilities dol Marketing dol Miscellaneous dol Mortality Disposal dol TOTAL DIRECT Indirect Costs: Investment Charge Market Inventory dol % Breeding Inventory dol % Equipment dol % Buildings dol % Land dol Labor dol. 19, Management dol. 25, TOTAL INDIRECT Nursery & finish charge 95, Conversion capitalization 40, % TOTAL COST Along this line, the cooperative concept might be structured to allow producers to specialize if they chose to do so. Smaller, younger producers with a small land base might begin with specialized farrowing to capitalize on their labor and management skills, while older, more established producers with a larger cropping program might elect to specialize in finishing. 167
5 Another arrangement that may be a better fit for some Midwest producers is to convert their existing farrow-to-finish facilities to finishing only. They might then buy into a portion of a large (600 to 1200 sow) specialized farrowing unit. This arrangement may fit the individual resources and interests of more Midwestern crop/hog farmers. This alternative allows producers to continue to utilize their facilities, feed processing equipment, labor, etc. in hog 8 Farrowing Units Sell Excess Cap. as Feeders COOP NURSERY Hd/Rm Figure 13-2 production. It also frees some labor to be used in the crop operation, but continues to capitalize on the complementary nature of the crop/hog enterprises by sharing labor, equipment, and the animal waste nutrient recycling program. Step-by-Step Conversion Finishers The conversion to SEW technology appears to be one of the more important technologies in terms of positive returns. However, there is a second economically important aspect of the SEW conversion involving the use of the original nursery space when the nursery is moved to another location. Table 13-2 summarizes some of the alternative ways of converting existing facilities in a 150 sow operation which is not being used intensively to SEW with intensive farrowing and pig flow. The base is the 150 sow low technology system which has 135 sows farrowing 7 times per year, with a continuous flow production system. The first conversion abandons the existing nursery and builds a new nursery unit at some other location (likely still on the same farmstead). With the incorporation of SEW technology, the pigs are weaned at a average of 16 days, and the number of days to market drops by 30 days down to 170 days. These enhancements allow the operation to increase total annual output from 2,204 market hogs sold to 3,032 head. The next three alternatives convert the old nursery unit into farrowing space, allowing even greater increases in annual production. The third column in Table 13-2, labeled 52 crate 8x, adds 16 crates in the old nursery, expanding the total number of crates from 36 to 52. This enables the operation to expand to 4,380 pigs marketed per year. 10 Wk Age M K 24 Wk 168
6 The final two conversions involve moving to a bi-weekly farrowing schedule and ultimately a weekly farrowing schedule. In each of these alternatives, the farrowing is divided into either two or three rooms (as shown in Table 13-2). Sow numbers reach as high as 380, and production expands to as high as 7,397 hogs marketed per year in the weekly farrowing alternative. Diagrams of the conversions are provided accompanying Tables 13-4 to 13-6 and Table Please note that the diagrams do not show the required expansions to the finishing facilities that would be required, but the notes on the figures do indicate the needed head capacity in finishing. For example, the base unit has capacity for 918 head of finishing hogs, while the 36 crate 8x alternative has a finishing capacity requirement of 972 pigs, or about 6 % more finishing space than in the base model. While budgets for each of these alternatives were not developed, it is expected that the costs of production for the last alternative which incorporates a weekly farrowing schedule would be similar to the budget for the Near Optimum Conversion earlier in this chapter. Table 13-3: SEW Conversion Alternatives Modeled Base 36 Crate 52 Crate Bi- Weekly Low Tech. 8x 8x Weekly Shown in Fig 13-3 Fig 13-4 Fig 13-5 Fig 13-6 Fig 13-7 Number of Sows Farrowings/Year 7x 8x 8x Bi-weekly Weekly Old Nursery In-line Abandon Farrowing Farrowing Farrowing New Nursery N/A Off-site Off-site Off-site Off-site Number of Crates Farrowing Rooms (24 each) 3(16 each) Avg. Weaning Age Max Days Market Pigs per Year
7 Table 13-4: Seven Farrowings per Year 36 Crate-7X/Year PRODUCTION SUMMARY Farrow Every 51 days in 1 Room(s)-36 Crate/Rm- 15 Days Open Wean age: Minimum 28 Days / Maximum 36 Days / Average 32 Days Wean Average 8.5 Pigs/Litter 200 Days to Market Pigs Weaned/Sow/Year 61 Pigs/Crate/Year 259 Litters/Year 2,204 Pigs/Year Sow Herd: 135 in 3 Groups of 45 Sows(no culling) Gest Capacity: 90 Sows Breed Capacity: 60 Sows+13 1st Heat Breed Conception Rate: Average= 80% Seasonal= 60% Sows must be bred within 8 days after weaning. Building Size 306 pigs/grp Farrow: 1 Room(s) = 306 (Maximum Age=36 Days) Nursery: 1 Group(s) = 306 (Maximum Age=87 Days) Finish: 3 Group(s) = 918 (Market Age=200 Days) 150 Sow Low Technology (7X/Year) FARROWING BUILDING 36 crates N Load out FINISHING BUILDING Three rooms of 306 hd 22 hd/pen - 12'x14' pens 918 Head 2 to 3 Acre Site NURSERY BUILDING 306 pigs in 14 pens pigs/pen 16 Sows/Pen 90 Sow Gest Bldg (2 grp) Shed and Lot 12 sow Breeding Bldg-Shed & Lot 60 Sows&13 170
8 Table 13-5: Eight Farrowings per Year with Off-Site Nursery 36 Crate-8X/Year PRODUCTION SUMMARY Farrow Every 39 Days in 1 Room(s)-36 Crate/Room- 18 Days Open Wean Age: Minimum= 10 Days / Maximum= 21 Days / Average= 16 Days Weaning Avg.= 9.0 Pigs/Litter 170 Days to Market Pigs Weaned/Sow/Year 84 Pigs/Crate/Year 337 Litters/Year 3,032 Pigs/Year Sow Herd: 180 in 4 Groups of 45 Sows(no culling) Gest Capacity: 135 Sows Breed Capacity: 60 Sows+16 2nd Heat Breed Conception Rate: Average= 80% Seasonal= 60% Sows must be bred within 30 days after weaning. Building Size 324 Pigs/Grp Farrow: 1 Room(s) = 324 (Maximum Age=21 Days) Nursery: 1 Grp(s) = 324 (Maximum Age=60 Days) Finish: 3 Grp(s) = 972 (Market Age=170 Days) 7X TYPICAL->36 Crate-8X/yr SEW(OFF-SITE NURSERY) (Added finishing space not drawn) FARROWING BUILDING 36 Crates, 7X -> 8X Old Nur. N FINISHING BUILDING Three rooms of 306 (918)hd 22 Hd/Pen - 12'X14' Pens Increase to 972 Pigs Convert Nursery To Other Use-Seal Wall at Finishing 16 Sows/Pen SHED AND LOT 90 Sow Gest -> 135 Sows BREEDING BLDG-SHED & LOT 60 Sow/13 -> 60 Sow/8 171
9 Table 13-6: Eight Farrowings/year with Off-Site Nursery and 52 Crates 52 Crate-8X/Year PRODUCTION SUMMARY Farrow Every 39 Days in 1 Room-52 Crate/Room- 18 Days Open Wean Age: Minimum= 10 Days / Maximum= 21 Days / Average= 16 Days Weaning Average= 9.0 Pigs/Litter 170 Days to Market Pigs Weaned/Sow/Year 84 Pigs/Crate/Year 487 Litters/Year 4,380 Pigs/Year Sow Herd: 260 in 4 Groups of 65 Sows(no culling) Gest Capacity: 195 Sows Breed Capacity: 87 Sows+22 2nd Heat Breed Conception Rate: Average= 80 % Seasonal= 60 % Sows must be bred within 30 days after weaning. Building Size 468 Pigs/Group Farrow: 1 Room(s) = 468 (Maximum Age=21 Days) Nursery: 1 Group(s) = 468 (Maximum Age=60 Days) Finish: 3 Group(s) = 1404 (Market Age=170 Days) 7X TYPICAL-> 52C rate/8x /yr SEW (O FF-SITE NURSERY) (Added finishing space not drawn.) FARROWING BUILDING 36 7X -> 52 crates, 8X N Load out FINISHING BUILDING Three rooms of 306 (918)hd 22 hd/pen - 12'x14' pens Increase to pigs CONVERT NURSERY To Farrowing-Seal Wall at Finishing SHED & LOT 90 Sow Gest.-> 195 Sows BREEDING BLDG-SHED & LOT 60 Sow/13 -> 90 sows &
10 Table 13-7: Bi-Weekly Farrowing with Off-Site Nursery Bi-Weekly, 2 Room PRODUCTION SUMMARY Farrow Every 14 Days in 2 Room(s)-24 Crate/Room- 6 Day Cleanup Wean Age: Minimum= 14 Days / Maximum= 21 Days / Average= 18 Days Weaning Average= 8.5 Pigs/Litter 178 Days to Market(max.) Pigs Weaned/Sow/Year 113 Pigs/Crate/Year 639 Litters/Year 5,435 Pigs/Year Sow Herd: 300 in 10 Groups of 30 Sows (no culling) Gest Capacity: 240 Sows Breed Capacity: 40 Sows+11 1st Heat Breed Conception Rate: Average= 80% Seasonal= 60% Sows must be bred within 7 days after weaning. Building Size 204 Pigs/Group Farrow: 2 Room(s) = 408 (Maximum Age=21 Days) Nursery: 4 Group(s) = 816 (Maximum Age=76 Days) Finish: 8 Group(s) = 1632 (Market Age=175 Days) 173
11 Table 13-8: Weekly Farrowings with Off-Site Nursery Weekly, 3 Room PRODUCTION SUMMARY Farrow Every 7 Days in 3 Room(s)-16 Crate/Room-2 Days Cleanup Weaning Age: Minimum= 12 Days / Maximum= 19 Days / Average= 16 Days Weaning Average= 9.0 Pigs/Litter 178 Days to Market(maximum) Pigs Weaned/Sow/Year 154 Pigs/Crate/Year 822 Litters/Year 7,397 Pigs/Year Sow Herd: 380 in 19 Groups of 20 Sows (no culling) Gest Cap: 320 Sows Breed Capacity: 27 Sows+7 1st Heat Breed Conception Rate: Average= 80% Seasonal= 60% Sows must be bred within 7 days after weaning. Building Size 144 Pigs/Group Farrow: 3 Room(s) = 432 (Maximum Age=19 Days) Nursery: 8 Group(s) = 1152 (Maximum Age=76 Days) Finish: 14 Group(s) = 2016 (Market Age=175 Days) 7X TYPICAL->W EEK LY /3 RM -SEW (O FF-SITE NURSERY) (Added finishing space not shown.) FARROWING BUILDING Convert Far/Nur To 3 RM OF 16 CRATES N Load out FINISHING BUILDING22 hd/pen-12'x14' pens Must Double Capacity from 3 Rm of 306 (918)Hd to 14 Groups of 136 = 1904 Hogs Shed and Lot 90 Sow Gest -> Total Gest.= 300 Sows Breeding Bldg-Shed & Lot Consider AI w/ith 32 sows 174
Chapter Fourteen: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Chapter Fourteen: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Chris Hurt The pork industry is changing rapidly. These changes not only are numerous but they are also complex, and they are threatening to most producers and
More informationChapter Three: 1200 SOW FARROW-TO-FINISH
Chapter Three: 1200 SOW FARROW-TO-FINISH Kenneth Foster, Chris Hurt, and Jeffrey Hale Introduction This chapter presents the 1200 sow capitalization and cost of production budgets and the associated economic
More informationSwine Production Records
A L A B A M A A & M A N D A U B U R N U N I V E R S I T I E S ANR-844 Production record systems overwhelm many farmers. However, if pork producers want to increase profit, then complete, detailed records
More informationLivestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker
Livestock Enterprise Ag Decision Maker Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21 This publication contains estimates of production costs for common livestock enterprises in Iowa. Estimates are intended to reflect
More informationDiversified versus Specialized Swine and Grain Operations
Animal Industry Report AS 650 ASL R1959 2004 Diversified versus Specialized Swine and Grain Operations Laura Borts Gary May John D. Lawrence Recommended Citation Borts, Laura; May, Gary; and Lawrence,
More informationHog Enterprise Summary
1990-98 Hog Enterprise Summary KENTUCKY FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Agricultural Economics Extension No. 2000-01 February 2000 By: GREGG IBENDAHL, RICK COSTIN, RICHARD COFFEY, AND RON FLEMING University
More informationLivestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2010 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker
Livestock Enterprise Ag Decision Maker Budgets for Iowa 2010 File B1-21 This publication contains estimates of production costs for common livestock enterprises in Iowa. Estimates are intended to reflect
More informationLivestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2008 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker
Livestock Enterprise Ag Decision Maker Budgets for Iowa 2008 File B1-21 This publication contains estimates of production costs for common livestock enterprises in Iowa. Estimates are intended to reflect
More informationVOLUME 6 ISSUE 2 AMBER WAVES ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE/USDA. Steve Woit, AgStockUSA
VOLUME 6 ISSUE 2 16 Steve Woit, AgStockUSA ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE/USDA Technology, Larger Farm Size Increased Productivity on U.S. Hog Farms Nigel Key nkey@ers.usda.gov William D. McBride wmcbride@ers.usda.gov
More informationBENCHMARKING SHOW ME THE MONEY!
BENCHMARKING SHOW ME THE MONEY! Ken McEwan University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown Ontario N0P 2C0 E-mail: kmcewan@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca ABSTRACT Benchmarking is a process
More informationHAPPY DAYS FOR HOG PRODUCERS CONTINUE
HAPPY DAYS FOR HOG PRODUCERS CONTINUE OCTOBER 2005 Chris Hurt 2005 No. 6 Summary The year ahead appears to be one of continued profitable returns for hog producers with average prices near $47 on a liveweight
More informationThe Iowa Pork Industry 2008: Patterns and Economic Importance by Daniel Otto and John Lawrence 1
The Iowa Pork Industry 2008: Patterns and Economic Importance by Daniel Otto and John Lawrence 1 Introduction The Iowa pork industry represents a significant value-added activity in the agricultural economy
More informationA. Circle the best answer. Put a square around your second choice, if you want. If your second choice is correct you get half credit.
Economics 330 Exam 1 Fall 2007 Farm Budgeting and Planning K E Y A. Circle the best answer. Put a square around your second choice, if you want. If your second choice is correct you get half credit. (4
More informationHog Industry Ask Where All the Pigs Came From?
Hog Industry Ask Where All the Pigs Came From? January 2002 Chris Hurt The year of 2001 resulted in pork supplies being up 1.1% with prices averaging $45.78 per live hundredweight. Increasing supplies
More informationEconomic Impacts from Increasing Pig Farrowing in Iowa
Animal Industry Report AS 654 ASL R2365 2008 Economic Impacts from Increasing Pig Farrowing in Iowa Erik M. Guffy Daniel M. Otto James B. Kliebenstein Michael D. Duffy Recommended Citation Guffy, Erik
More informationThe Iowa Pork Industry 2003: Patterns and Economic Importance
The Iowa Pork Industry 2003: Patterns and Economic Importance by Daniel Otto and John Lawrence* Introduction The pork industry of Iowa represents a major value-added activity in the agricultural economy
More information1997 Survey of Former Iowa Hog Producers: Motivations of Exiting and Incentives to Return
1997 Survey of Former Iowa Hog Producers: Motivations of Exiting and Incentives to Return John D. Lawrence 1 Introduction Over 14,000 Iowa farmers quit raising hogs between December 199 and December 1996.
More informationAGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES
AGRICULTURAL ALTERNATIVES http://agalternatives.aers.psu.edu Swine Production Technological change and vertical integration in the swine industry have resulted in fewer farms producing record amounts of
More informationLITTLE EXPANSION, BUT LITTLE PROFIT AS WELL FOR PORK PRODUCERS
LITTLE EXPANSION, BUT LITTLE PROFIT AS WELL FOR PORK PRODUCERS JULY 2006 Chris Hurt 2006 NO. 4 Summary The nation s breeding herd continues to exhibit a small expansion. However, the number of pigs per
More informationThe Big Hog Cycle What goes down, must go up?
Theoretical Four Year Hog Cycle Source: Hog Market Cycles, http://ndsuext.nodak.edu/extpubs/ansci/swine/ec1101w.htm The Big Hog Cycle What goes down, must go up? John Bancroft OMAF Grower-Finisher Specialist
More informationEconomics of Breeding, Gestating and Farrowing Hogs in Natural Pork Production; Financial Comparison
Animal Industry Report AS 652 ASL R2165 2006 Economics of Breeding, Gestating and Farrowing Hogs in Natural Pork Production; Financial Comparison Denis Reich Iowa State University James B. Kliebenstein
More informationTwo-litter Outdoor Farrowing System Budget
Two-litter Outdoor Farrowing System Budget Benjamin Larson, senior undergraduate; Mark Honeyman, associate professor of animal science; and James Kliebenstein, professor of economics ASL-R1501 Summary
More informationMarket Forces. Sharpen the saw concepts, resources & issues. Market Forces. Market Forces
Sharpen the saw concepts, resources & issues Corn July contract June 11, 2008 3.8 X higher Mark Storlie ISU Swine Field Specialist 563-425-3331 or mstorlie@iastate.edu GOLD June contract Monthly Corn and
More informationAGEC 641 Chapters 8 and 9 Homework Spring 2006
AGEC 641 Chapters 8 and 9 Homework Spring 2006 1. Suppose that you are hired as the manager of Sam's Hog and Crop Conglomerate. Sam owns two crop farms and a hog operation. Sam wishes to maximize overall
More informationRevised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007
Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007 The Economics Department at Iowa State University has prepared monthly Estimated Returns to Feeding Livestock in Iowa since the 1960s. Each month the
More informationPROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997
January 1997 A.E.A. Information Series No. 150 PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF CATTLE, DAIRY PRODUCTION, SWINE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE CROPS IN LOUISIANA, 1997 by Robert W. Boucher Jeffrey M. Gillespie
More informationNational Pork Producers Council
National Pork Producers Council Economic Impact Studies OKLAHOMA PORK PRODUCTION AT-A-GLANCE 1,947 FARMS PRODUCING HOGS 2,150,000 TOTAL HOGS 12,100 JOBS IN PORK PRODUCTION $473.3 MILLION OF PERSONAL INCOME
More information3/10/ Much less important today 2. Less important t today 3. Equally important 4. More important today 5. Much more important today
Economic Evaluation of Swine Health and Disease Interventions 2009 Iowa Pork Regional Conferences Dr. Derald Holtkamp, DVM, MS Iowa State University The conventional wisdom that served the industry reasonably
More informationHOG PRODUCERS SHOW LITTLE SIGN OF RETREAT
HOG PRODUCERS SHOW LITTLE SIGN OF RETREAT APRIL 2007 Chris Hurt 2007 NO. 2 Hog producers reported in the latest USDA update that they increased the size of the breeding herd by 1 percent. This means pork
More informationHog Producers Show Little Sign of Retreat
Hog Producers Show Little Sign of Retreat April 2007 Chris Hurt 2007-No2 Hog producers reported they are continuing to increase the size of the breeding herd by one percent in the latest USDA update. This
More informationTrends in the Missouri Swine Industry
Trends in the Missouri Swine Industry Dee Hartley and Joe Parcell* d Overview The value of hog production in the state of Missouri followed a downward trend throughout the s. The value of hog production
More informationRECENT PROGRESS IN SWINE BREEDING AND RAISING TECHNOLOGIES
RECENT PROGRESS IN SWINE BREEDING AND RAISING TECHNOLOGIES John Carr; Shih Ping Chen; Chuan Hising Chang; Hsueh-Tao Liu; Ke-Jian Cheng; Jui-Tai Chou; Shuen-Ren Liou and Sheng-Yi Zeng Agricultural Technology
More informationHOG PROFITS NARROW AS CORN PRICE RISKS RISE
HOG PROFITS NARROW AS CORN PRICE RISKS RISE APRIL 2006 Chris Hurt 2006 NO. 3 After two years of notable profits, hog producers have started to worry about eroding hog prices and rising risk of higher corn
More informationCost of Organic Pork Production: A Seasonal Analysis and Needed Price Premium for Continuous Production
Cost of Organic Pork Production: A Seasonal Analysis and Needed Price Premium for Continuous Production By James Kliebenstein 1, Sean Hurley 2, Ben Larson 1, and Mark Honeyman 1 1 Kliebenstein, Larson
More informationEconomic Impact of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus on U.S. Pork Producers
Animal Industry Report AS 658 ASL R2671 2012 Economic Impact of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus on U.S. Pork Producers Derald J. Holtkamp Iowa State University James B. Kliebenstein
More informationBorn in Canada and Raised in the USA
Born in Canada and Raised in the USA Greg Howard Vice President, Chief Operating Officer Premium Pork A look at a large cross border farrow to finish operation Premium Pork is a farrow to finish system
More informationLivestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2016 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker
Livestock Enterprise Ag Decision Maker Budgets for Iowa 2016 File B1-21 This publication contains estimates of production costs for common livestock enterprises in Iowa. Estimates are intended to reflect
More informationOctober 1998 ARPR 98-03
October 1998 ARPR 98-03 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1172 http://dare.colostate.edu/pubs SWINE INDUSTRY ECONOMICS Jennifer Grannis and Andrew Seidl 1,2 Changes
More informationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Production and Marketing Characteristics of U.S. Pork Producers, 2006 John D. Lawrence, Glenn Grimes June 2007 Working Paper # 07014 Department of Economics Working Papers Series
More informationIowa Pork Congress Meat Sector Outlook. Steve R. Meyer, Ph.D. Paragon Economics, Inc. Paragon Economics, Inc. From information, knowledge
Iowa Pork Congress 2012 Meat Sector Outlook Steve R. Meyer, Ph.D. Key issues for 12 pork producer profits Exports Exchange rates, trade policy, disease status U.S. demand U.S. economy, prices of competitor
More informationEconomics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting
Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1 K E Y Strategic Planning and Budgeting Circle the letter of the best answer. You may put a square around the letter of your second choice. If your second choice is right,
More informationHOGS VS. ETHANOL: ETHANOL WINS!
HOGS VS. ETHANOL: ETHANOL WINS! OCTOBER 2006 Chris Hurt 2006 NO. 6 The pork industry s concerns about higher corn prices from the extraordinary growth in corn demand for ethanol appears to be moving from
More informationand returns for an enterprise of a different size and type than the one in this budget or for different
Department of Animal Science Campus Box 7621 Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7621 Phone: (919) 515-2755 Fax: (919) 515-6884 Sustainable Outdoor Drylot Farrow to Finish Hog Enterprise Budget Geoffrey A. Benson,
More informationGrant County Blake s Point RE, LLC information sheet for a sow farm
Grant County Blake s Point RE, LLC information sheet for a sow farm February, Purpose: To produce high quality weaned piglets to supply family pork producers located in the Midwest. Why Grant County: Ag
More informationReport on Minnesota Farm Finances. August, 2009
2008 Report on Minnesota Farm Finances August, 2009 Acknowledgements: Contributing Minnesota producers Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Farm Business Management Education Program Southwestern
More informationSWINE MARKET OUTLOOK
2017 IOWA PORK REGIONAL CONFERENCES February 20-24, 2017 SWINE MARKET OUTLOOK Lee Schulz, Department of Economics, Iowa State University (515) 294-3356; lschulz@iastate.edu U.S. Corn Supply and Use 2013
More informationGuidelines for Estimating. Swine Farrow-Finish Costs 2012 in Manitoba
Guidelines for Estimating Swine Farrow-Finish Costs 2012 in Manitoba Guidelines For Estimating Swine Farrow-Finish Costs Based On 500 Sows and 11,338 Pigs Sold Based on all feed being purchased Date: October,
More informationCATTLE MAY HAVE A DECENT, BUT VOLATILE YEAR
CATTLE MAY HAVE A DECENT, BUT VOLATILE YEAR FEBRUARY 2004 Chris Hurt 2004 NO. 2 Summary Early indications are that 2004 will not be as difficult for the cattle industry as many producers had feared in
More informationCosts And Returns Of Producing Market Hogs In Alabama
Costs And Returns Of Producing Market Hogs In Alabama / 4 ~,d\ "~~ BULLETIN 406 NOVEMBER 1970 Agricultural Experiment Station AUBURN UNIVERSITY ~7 r I E. V. Smith, Director/Auburn, Alabama CONTENTS Page
More informationFeeder Pig Marketing Techniques
Feeder Pig Marketing Techniques Originally published as PIH-72. Authors Dennis DiPietre, University of Missouri Ronald L. Plain, University of Missouri Ted Schroeder, Kansas State University Roderick C.
More informationEconomic Impact of Swine Operations. User Guide. National Pork Board
Economic Impact of Swine Operations User Guide National Pork Board Table of Contents Economic Impact of Swine Operations... 3 Overview...3 How to use... 3 How to use guide...3 General tips...3 Instructions...
More informationReal-Life Implementation of Controlled Breeding Season
Real-Life Implementation of Controlled Breeding Season T. R. Troxel, Ph.D. Professor and Associate Department Head, Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR Story in Brief Reducing the length
More informationUsing Seasonal Hog Price Patterns in Marketing
EC-653 Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service West Lafayette, IN 47907 Using Seasonal Hog Price Patterns in Marketing Chris Hurt, Extension Economist Hog prices tend to move in regular price patterns
More informationPork Industry Makes Turn for the Better
Pork Industry Makes Turn for the Better July 2004 Chris Hurt After a period of grave concern regarding depressed hog prices and rising feed prices in the spring, markets have turned positive for hog producers.
More informationCosts and Returns of Producing Feeder Pigs in Alabama
NOVEMBER 1970 Costs and Returns of Producing Feeder Pigs in Alabama ~z ~72 2~ / IY I ~ ta1rcf P ~ k N N I Awu.rn, Aitvt mo CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION -- Objectives of Study 3 Selection of Sam ple- - -
More informationWeekly Hog Report Cash Slaughter Weight Hog Prices Futures Markets
This information is provided as a resource by Saskatchewan Agriculture staff. All prices are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. Please use this information at your own risk. Weekly Hog Report
More informationHog and Pork Situation and Outlook
Hog and Pork Situation and Outlook August 13, 2014 Lee Schulz Assistant Professor & Extension Livestock Economist Department of Economics Iowa State University lschulz@iastate.edu (515) 294-3356 2014 Midwest
More informationReport on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2015
2014 Report on Minnesota Farm Finances April, 2015 Acknowledgements: Contributing Minnesota producers Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Farm Business Management Education Program Southwestern Minnesota
More informationMSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.
MSU Extension Publication Archive Archive copy of publication, do not use for current recommendations. Up-to-date information about many topics can be obtained from your local Extension office. Marketing
More informationTHE EFFECT OF WATER ON PIGS: PERFORMANCE OR WASTE
THE EFFECT OF WATER ON PIGS: PERFORMANCE OR WASTE Dr. Glen Almond Department of Population Health and Pathobiology North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 2766 Introduction Water is important in pork
More informationMapping for manure management Written by Diane Mettler
1 of 6 02/07/2009 10:15 AM Mapping for manure management Written by Diane Mettler By employing new manure mapping technologies and through their own progressive initiatives, Iowa s Van Gilst brothers are
More informationCOMPARATIVE PRODUCTION PERFORMANCES OF CERTAIN PIC GENOTYPES IN SWINE COMMERCIAL FARMING
COMPARATIVE PRODUCTION PERFORMANCES OF CERTAIN PIC GENOTYPES IN SWINE COMMERCIAL FARMING I. Ladoşi 1, M.G. Bereş 2, Ileana Bereş 2, Daniela Ladoşi 3, Paula Muntean 1, C. Lăpuşte 1, M. Boc 1 1 Pig Improvement
More informationContract Finishing for New Entrants in Pork Production By Laura L. Martin, Dale Rozeboom and Gerald D. Schwab. Staff Paper March 1997
Staff Paper Contract Finishing for New Entrants in Pork Production By Laura L. Martin, Dale Rozeboom and Gerald D. Schwab Staff Paper 97-15 March 1997 Department of Agricultural Economics MICHIGAN STATE
More informationHOG INDUSTRY NEEDS MORE DOWNSIZING IN 2004
HOG INDUSTRY NEEDS MORE DOWNSIZING IN 2004 JANUARY 2004 Chris Hurt 2004 NO. 1 Summary Rising costs of production and continued nearrecord pork production will keep producer margins near breakeven in 2004.
More informationBenchmark Perspectives for The Ontario Swine Industry
Benchmark Perspectives for The Ontario Swine Industry Prepared for Ontario Pork Producers Marketing Board Etobicoke, Ontario By Lynn Marchand and Ken McEwan Fall, 1999 Acknowledgements This study was made
More informationReport on Minnesota Farm Finances. April, 2010
2009 Report on Minnesota Farm Finances April, 2010 Acknowledgements: Contributing Minnesota producers Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Farm Business Management Education Program Southwestern Minnesota
More informationReport on Minnesota Farm Finances. May, 2017
2016 Report on Minnesota Farm Finances May, 2017 Acknowledgements: Contributing Minnesota producers Minnesota Farm Business Management Education, Minnesota State Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management
More informationGrass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009
AS 658 ASL R2684 2012 Grass-fed and Organic Beef: Production Costs and Breakeven Market Prices, 2008 and 2009 Denise Schwab Iowa State University Margaret Smith Iowa State University H. Joe Sellers Iowa
More informationFarrow-to-Finish Swine Production in Ten Counties of West Tennessee
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Research Reports AgResearch 2-1987 Farrow-to-Finish Swine Production in Ten Counties of West Tennessee University of Tennessee
More informationWorld Pig Meat Production Welcome to Denmark 5.4 million people 16, 000 sq miles 62% farmed
Iowa Pork Regional Conferences, February 2-24, 26 Maximizing Productivity and Throughput: Reflections from Denmark ISU Swine Field Specialists Dennis DeWitt, Russ Euken, Larry McMullen, Dave Stender, Mark
More informationLooking Ahead: 2014 Livestock and Grain Economic Outlook
Looking Ahead: 2014 Livestock and Grain Economic Outlook February 2014 Lee Schulz Assistant Professor & Extension Livestock Economist Department of Economics Iowa State University lschulz@iastate.edu (515)
More informationOpportunities in Coordinated Hog Production
Opportunities in Coordinated Hog Production J. Ray, M. Boehlje, and C. Hurt Department of Agricultural Economics Hogs have traditionally been raised on independent farms in which most of the needed services
More informationNZPork Guide: Outdoor Pigs in OVERSEER
NZPork Guide: Outdoor Pigs in OVERSEER This guidance has been developed for nutrient budget advisors that provide support outdoor pork producers and their consultants using the online version of OVERSEER.
More informationMARGINS EVERY PRODUCER SHOULD HAVE 2017 I.S.U. Swine Day. June 28, 2017
MARGINS EVERY PRODUCER SHOULD HAVE 2017 I.S.U. Swine Day June 28, 2017 AgStar Swine Team Kent Bang Steve Malakowsky Daryl Timmerman Dusty Compart VP & Team Leader VP Industry Specialist Sr. Financial
More informationEconomics of Finishing Pigs in Hoop Structures and Confinement: A Summer Group under Different Space Restrictions
Economics of Finishing Pigs in Hoop Structures and Confinement: A Summer Group under Different Space Restrictions Ben Larson, research assistant James Kliebenstein, professor, Department of Economics Mark
More informationWeaner Pig (Nursery) Costs 5-23 kg
Guidelines For Estimating Weaner Pig (Nursery) Costs 5-23 kg Based on marketing 35,308 pigs Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines for determining the
More information2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)
2011 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2 Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information) Please use the Market Value when making the calculations for the Zimmerman
More informationPastured Pork Production. Tim Holmes Director of Compliance A Greener World
Pastured Pork Production Tim Holmes Director of Compliance A Greener World A Greener World was founded to: Identify and promote agricultural systems that have a positive impact on the environment, society
More informationAgriculture & Business Management Notes...
Agriculture & Business Management Notes... Using Partial Budgeting to Analyze Drought Management Strategies Quick Notes... To minimize financial hardship under drought conditions, partial budgeting is
More informationUPDATED HOG PRODUCTION ESTIMATED RETURNS
February 15, 21 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 187 UPDATED HOG PRODUCTION ESTIMATED RETURNS The Iowa State University Extension Estimated Livestock Returns have provided a barometer of profitability for the Iowa
More informationEconomic Opportunities for Missouri with Swine Finishing Operations. January 2013
Economic Opportunities for Missouri with Swine Finishing Operations January 2013 The Commercial Agriculture Program at the University of Missouri completed this report. This program is an interdisciplinary
More informationAgricultural. Experiment Station OREGON STATE COLLEGE. Corvallis HOG. PRODUCTIOfl. Grant E. Blanch STATION BULLETIN 561. June 1957
Agricultural Experiment Station S OREGON STATE COLLEGE Corvallis HOG PRODUCTIOfl Grant E. Blanch S STATION BULLETIN 561 June 1957 Contents The Situation 2 What Affects Production Costs 12 What It Costs
More informationCATTLE EXPANSION IS UNDERWAY
CATTLE EXPANSION IS UNDERWAY February 2005 Chris Hurt 2005 No. 2 Summary Cattle producers have responded to record high cattle prices by expanding the breeding herd, and more expansion is on the way. USDA
More informationREDUCING FEED COSTS IN GROWER-FINISHER BARNS
REDUCING FEED COSTS IN GROWER-FINISHER BARNS Greg Simpson Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 6484 Wellington Road 7, Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 E-mail: greg.simpson@ontario.ca INTRODUCTION
More informationRon Plain Beth Young Marcia Shannon John Lory Joe Zulovich
Ron Plain Beth Young Marcia Shannon John Lory Joe Zulovich Document improvements in: Sow Productivity/Cost of production (Ron Plain) Herd health (Beth Young) Herd feed efficiency (Marcia Shannon) Environmental
More information2006 Iowa Farm Costs. and Returns File C1-10. Ag Decision Maker. Definition of Terms Used
2006 Iowa Farm Costs Ag Decision Maker and Returns File C1-10 The farm record data utilized in this report were obtained from the Iowa Farm Business Associations. The average of all farms in each table
More informationBackgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity
1 of 7 10/30/2009 3:17 PM University of Missouri Extension G2095, Reviewed October 1993 Backgrounding Calves Part 1: Assessing the Opportunity Homer B. Sewell Department of Animal Sciences Victor E. Jacobs
More informationPork Production Costs: A Comparison Of Major Pork Exporting Countries
Pork Production Costs: A Comparison Of Major Pork Exporting Countries Clarence Brewer, James Kliebenstein, and Marvin Hayenga Staff Paper No. 302 June 30, 1998 Department of Economics Iowa State University
More informationCost of Production Benchmark for Ontario, Manitoba and Iowa
Cost of Production Benchmark for Ontario, Manitoba and Iowa Prepared for: Prepared by: Randy Duffy and Ken McEwan November 2007 Acknowledgements The report Cost of Production Benchmark for Ontario, Manitoba
More information2017 FINBIN Report on Minnesota Farm Finances
Acknowledgements: Contributing Minnesota producers Minnesota Farm Business Management Education, Minnesota State Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management Association Thank you to Brittni Lamoreux
More information04/11 14/10 23/09 02/09 12/08 22/07 01/07 10/06 20/05 29/04 08/04 18/03
Monthly Summary Nov-5 Target Average 4/11 14/1 23/9 2/9 12/8 22/7 1/7 1/6 2/5 29/4 8/4 18/3 Stock Sows 237.8 237 229 224 229 229 23 237 243 247 255 25 244 Maiden Gilts 7.5 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 12 19 Sucklers
More informationKansas Farm Economy Update Land and Leasing
Kansas Farm Economy Update Land and Leasing Mykel Taylor Kansas State University January 10, 2017 Net Farm and Ranch Income Returns over Total Costs ($/ac) $230,000 $180,000 $130,000 $80,000 $30,000 $(20,000)
More informationReview of Manitoba Guidelines for Estimating Costs of Production 2013 Name (optional):
Review of Manitoba Guidelines for Estimating Costs of Production 2013 Name (optional): 1. What type of operation do you run? 2. What is the size of your operation (number of pig spaces/ number of sows)?
More informationLIVESTOCK FEEDING ENTERPRISES PROFITABLE IN 1996
January 15, 1997 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 1709 LIVESTOCK FEEDING ENTERPRISES PROFITABLE IN 1996 In spite of record high corn prices, 1996 will go into the books as a profitable year for livestock feeding
More informationHog Producers Near the End of Losses
Hog Producers Near the End of Losses January 2003 Chris Hurt Last year was another tough one for many hog producers unless they had contracts that kept the prices they received much above the average spot
More informationLivestock Marketing Information Center State Extension Services in Cooperation with USDA
Analysis & Comments Livestock Marketing Information Center State Extension Services in Cooperation with USDA May 3, 2018 Letter #18 www.lmic.info Hog Situation and Outlook: Dressed Weights Adding to Production
More informationUNIT 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS FOR PRODUCING, BREEDING, AND MARKETING AGRICULTURE ANIMALS
UNIT 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS FOR PRODUCING, BREEDING, AND MARKETING AGRICULTURE ANIMALS THE ANIMAL AGRICULTURE PROCESS The process for producing and caring for animals varies greatly depending on the
More informationDRAFT REPORT. November Tim Sexton, Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Richmond, VA
Recommendations to Estimate Swine Nutrient Production in the Phase 6 Watershed Model DRAFT REPORT Report to the Agricultural Modeling Subcommittee and Agricultural Workgroup November 2016 Report generation
More informationFARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT 2009 Annual Report Central and West Central Minnesota April, 2010 A Management Education Program Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Ridgewater College VISIT OUR WEBSITE
More information