Alliancing in Tampere, Finland The Tunnel of Rantaväylä. Viikko 39/2012

Transcription

1 Alliancing in Tampere, Finland The Tunnel of Rantaväylä Viikko 39/2012 1

2 Tunnel allows built new housing to the city center 2

3 2 one-way 2,3 km road tunnels Interchange in both ends Provision for one in the middle Daily traffic volume Over In the future Target costs 180,3 M (May 2013) Development period (in Alliance) July 2012 autumn 2013 Implementation period (in Alliance) has been started October 2013 Ready to use in 2017 Finishing

4 The time scale for the project Development phase Design Key targets Target price Impl. plan Implementation phase Construction New target Defects correction period 4

5 th October

6 IPD Integrated Project Delivery The owner and service providers combine an integrated project team to implement the project Target is to provide value for the owners money 6

7 Why IPD? We were not satisfied to: Risks Management Costs Control Operational transparency between owner and contractor Lack of innovations The construction sector's productivity 7

8 One way to do IPD is Alliance Some Key words: Project Delivery The commercial model of Alliance encourage everybody to do everything for the best of the project You can not succeed by optimizing only your own delivery 9

9 Alliance key words Risks will be shared collectively If participant can t control some risk, then it is owners risk No blame between participants except if it is question about wilful default Open book method with payments Direct costs will be paid by the open book method Fee is based of actual costs 10

10 Unanimous desicion making We all must agree Project team has been selected so that there is the best person for the right job 11

11 Integrated Project Delivery Allianssin pääpiirteet Traditional Project Delivery 12

12 Tampere tunneling alliance partners WE DO EVERYTHING TOGETHER OWNERS Finnish Transport Agency Tampere City WE SHARE ALL IDEAS TO ALL OTHERS SERVICE PROVIDERS Lemminkäinen Infra Oy Saanio & Riekkola Oy A-Insinöörit Suunnittelu Oy 13

13 Not like this 14

14 Lessons learnt Clear evidence of innovation promotion No contractual barriers which prevents changes Explode the innovations systematically APPROVED UNFINISHED FROZEN CAST OFF More than 50 ideas More than 20 innovations ~ 20 M value We can plan and prepare right things in the right time Time table is not stretching because of the changes ROAD BRIDGE TUNNEL One Big room is better tha several Rather workshop than meeting Tecnology groups takes TECNICAL SYSTEMS responsibility Liikennevirasto to explode the ideas 15

15 Tunnels safety Dir: 2004/54/EU and equipment Safety lane through the whole tunnel Tapani Toivanen Rantatunnelin tekniset järjestelmät

16 ALSO: Interchange near the tunnel end increases need to change lanes inside the tunnel Ventilation with high traffic volume is much easier if the tunnels are designed to be only one-way roads If there is a reasonable vice road, think very carfefully the reasons why there is a need for automatic fireextinguishing Road tunnels maintenance should be planned and modeling before

17 Optimizing Minimum requirements or? Improving the productivity Module building enables Lean Lean improves quality and quality improves safety

18 Tunnel tube and the technology corridor

19 Modular building moduulia Every gateway between tunnel tubes is standard module 150m long tunnel is own module which is going to be repeated

20 1. Extraction N 2. Reinforcement N-1 3. Groundworks N-2 4. technology installation N-3 Modular building

21 With innovative methods you can: Increase productivity and efficiency Make more room for quality and safety Design life-cycle costs to be more meaningful Ensure better functionality of the various technical systems and design more flexible 22

22 Thank you 23