A PERSON DESIGNATED WITH THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING.

Transcription

1 AGENDA BIRMINGHAM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING MUNICIPAL BUILDING-COMMISSION ROOM-151 MARTIN STREET WEDNESDAY September 3, 2014 ***** 7:15 PM***** 1) Roll Call 2) Approval of the DRB Minutes of August 20, ) Sign Review 663 S. Adams Orange Theory Fitness 640 N. Old Woodward Jonna Luxury Homes 4) Design and Sign Review 394 S. Old Woodward Roche Bobis 5) Short Term Projects 6) Miscellaneous Business and Communication A. Staff Reports Administrative Approvals Violation Notices B. Communications Commissioners Comments 7) Adjournment Notice: Individuals requiring accommodations, such as interpreter services, for effective participation in this meeting should contact the City Clerk's Office at (248) at least on day in advance of the public meeting. Las personas que requieren alojamiento, tales como servicios de interpretación, la participación efectiva en esta reunión deben ponerse en contacto con la Oficina del Secretario Municipal al (248) por lo menos el día antes de la reunión pública. (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). A PERSON DESIGNATED WITH THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING.

2 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES OF AUGUST 20, 2014 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan Minutes of the regular meeting of the Design Review Board ( DRB ) held Wednesday, August 20, Chairman John Henke called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. Present: Absent: Chairman John Henke; Commission Members Mark Coir, Shelli Weisberg, Michael Willoughby; Student Representatives Mitch Boorstein, Cambrea Rush Commission Members Vice-Chairman Keith Deyer, Natalia Dukas, Darlene Gehringer Administration: Matthew Baka, Sr. Planner Carole Salutes, Recording Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES DRB Minutes of August 6, 2014 Motion by Mr. Coir Seconded by Mr. Willoughby to approve the DRB Minutes of August 6, 2014 as presented. Motion carried, 4-0. VOICE VOTE Yeas: Coir, Willoughby, Henke, Weisberg Nays: None Absent: Deyer, Dukas, Gehringer Chairman Henke offered the petitioner the opportunity to postpone at no penalty to the next meeting when a full board might be present. It requires four affirmative votes to pass a motion and only four of the normal seven board members were in attendance this evening. Therefore, a unanimous vote is required. However, the applicant wished to go forward. DESIGN AND SIGN REVIEW Woodward Ave

3 Design Review Board Minutes of August 20, 2014 Page 2 of 4 Main St. Building Group Zoning: B2-B General Business Proposal: The applicant proposes to rehabilitate the existing façade of Woodward Ave. The existing commercial space is located behind the Domino s Pizza at Woodward Ave. and Bennaville. The existing façade is severely outdated and worn and in need of an update. The applicant is proposing to renovate the two facades that face Bennaville and the public alley respectively and paint the CMU wall of the neighboring building, which is under the same ownership. The current door location along Bennaville will be eliminated and a new double door is proposed at the center of the building. Design: The existing Bennaville elevation has three large single-pane windows and one single man door. The frame from a previous awning is also still on the building but is no longer covered. The rear elevation of the building has a heavily worn roll up door. The applicant proposes to update the façade with new MDF panels and trim molding, two new insulated windows and a new double glass door entryway with a transom window and metal awning above. On the east (rear) elevation the applicant proposes to replace the overhead door and install the same MDF panels and trim. The body of the building and the north facing wall of the neighboring building are proposed to be painted BM #1546 (Gargoyle) with the trim molding painted BM #1545 (Iron Gate) The trim on the new windows, double door and overhead door is proposed to be painted BM #1547 (Dragon s Breath). Above the new entranceway the applicant proposes to install a black metal canopy. The canopy is proposed to be 7 ft. 1 in. wide by 1 ft. 6 in. in height and project 3 ft. out from the face of the building. The mounting height above grade will be 9 ft. 7 in.. The canopy will be supported by tie-back rods attached to the building above the canopy. Illumination: The applicant proposes to install three black coach lamps at 100 watts each. The plans as submitted indicate the lamps are proposed to be mounted at approximately 5 ft. above grade. However, the Engineering Department has indicated that all projections above the right of way must be mounted at a minimum of 7 ft. above grade. The applicant has agreed to raise the mounting height of the fixture to 7 ft. above grade. Signage: The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. However, they have indicated that they may decide to pursue a small non-illuminated raised brushed metal name letter sign in the future that would be attached to the front of the canopy on Bennaville. The area indicated on the plans designated for the sign measures 7 ft. 1 in. x 1 ft. 6 in. for a total of sq ft. of sign area. The total linear building frontage of the building is 41 ft. allowing 61.5 sq. ft. of

4 Design Review Board Minutes of August 20, 2014 Page 3 of 4 signage. In accordance with Article 1.0, section 1.04 (B) of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Combined Sign Area - For all buildings, including multi-tenant office or retail buildings, the combined area of all types of signs shall not exceed 1 sq. ft. (1.5 sq. ft. for addresses on Woodward Ave.) for each linear foot of principal building frontage. The proposal meets this requirement. The applicant has requested permission to administratively approve the signage at a later date with the understanding that it will be located in the area indicated on the plans and be fabricated of raised letter brush metal or material of equal or greater quality. Mr. Baka advised the property owner recently got permission to count some onstreet parking toward their parking requirement. Material samples of both the canopy and signage backing were shown. Mr. Jim Charles, Mainstreet Building, said this space will be his personal office. The door will be clear glass with one panel on the bottom. The landlord has given him permission to paint the wall to the left and the 2 ft. area across the top of his building consistent with his color. Motion by Ms. Weisberg Seconded by Mr. Willoughby to approve the Design Review Application for Woodward Ave., Mainstreet Building Group The proposal meets the of Section of the Zoning Code. There was no one in the audience to comment on the motion at 7:23 p.m. VOICE VOTE Yeas: Weisberg, Willoughby, Coir, Henke Nays: None Absent: Deyer, Dukas, Gehringer MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Staff Reports -- Administrative Approvals (none) -- Violation Notices (none) B. Communications -- Commissioners Comments

5 Design Review Board Minutes of August 20, 2014 Page 4 of 4 Mr. Willoughby suggested that someone from Code Enforcement should look at images glued to the round part of the wall above the camera store. ADJOURNMENT No further business being evident, the board motioned to adjourn the meeting at 7:25 p.m. Matthew Baka Sr. Planner

6 MEMORANDUM Date: August 29, 2014 To: Design Review Board Members From: Matthew Baka, Senior Planner RE: Design and Sign Review 394 S. Old Woodward Roche Bobis Zoning: B-2, General Business Existing Use: Vacant Proposal The applicant proposes to convert a vacant auto showroom into a furniture store. The applicant proposes to clad the exterior in aluminum panels, paint portions of the building, replace two existing doors and install new signage. Design The existing building is brick and CMU. The applicant proposes to remove the theater window and marquee as well as replace the existing façade panels on the east and south elevations of the building with anodic satin mica Alucabond panels. The roll-up door on the south elevation is proposed to be replaced with a 7 double entrance door. The proposal also includes replacing the southern set of double doors on the front elevation with new glass windows to match the existing windows and frames. The CMU, at the west end of the south elevation, will be repainted to match the existing color. The soffits of the canopy are proposed to be painted Decorators white. Signage The applicant proposes to install two internally illuminated box signs with flat translucent fronts and one projecting blade sign. The applicant has been advised that box signs are not permitted under the Birmingham Sign Ordinance and that push-thru dimensional letters will be required for approval. The total linear building frontage is 60, permitting 60 square feet of sign area. The proposed roche bobis signs will measure h x w or square feet each. The proposed projecting sign will measure 60 h x w or 4.7 square feet per side for a total of 9.4 square feet. The total area of all signs will be In accordance with Article 1.0, section 1.04 (B) of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Combined Sign Area - For all buildings, including multi-tenant office or retail buildings, the combined area of all types of signs shall not exceed 1 square foot (1.5 square feet for addresses on Woodward Avenue) for each linear foot of principal building frontage. The proposal meets this requirement. Both box signs are proposed to be mounted above grade. The projecting sign is proposed to be mounted 9 9 above grade. In accordance with Article 1.0, Table B of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance - Wall signs that project more than 3 inches from the building facade shall not be attached to the outer wall at a height of less than 8 feet above a public sidewalk and at a height of less than 15 feet above public alley. The proposal meets this requirement. The proposed Roche Bobis signs are proposed to be constructed of white diffusing Perspex with a lacquered cover sheet. The frames will be bolted to the wall

7 The Material for the projecting sign was not indicated on the plans. Illumination The box signs are proposed to be internally illuminated. The light source was not indicated on the plans. The applicant is also proposing to replace the existing soffit lights with 6 flush mounted LED down lights. Design Recommendation When reviewing the project against the standards of Section of the City of Birmingham Zoning Ordinance, staff makes the following observations: 1. The appearance color and texture of materials being used will likely preserve and not adversely affect property values in the immediate neighborhood. The overall design is not likely to adversely affect property values. 2. The appearance of the building exterior will not detract from the general harmony of and is compatible with other buildings already existing in the immediate neighborhood. The overall design elements will not detract from the harmony and appeal of the other buildings on S. Old Woodward. The proposed design is compatible with the surrounding building façades. 3. The appearance of the building exterior will not be garish or otherwise offensive to the sense of sight. The proposed design elements are not garish or offensive to the sense of sight. Sign Recommendation In accordance with Section 86, Article 2, 2.02 (c) of the City of Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Planning Division Sign review approval shall be granted only upon determining the following: 1. The scale, color, texture and materials of the sign being used will identify the business succinctly, and will enhance the building on which it is located, as well as the immediate neighborhood. 2. The scale, color, texture and materials of the sign will be compatible with the style, color, texture and materials of the building on which it is located, as well as neighboring buildings. 3. The appearance of the building exterior with the signage will preserve or enhance, and not adversely impact, the property values in the immediate neighborhood. 4. The sign is neither confusing nor distracting, nor will it create a traffic hazard or otherwise adversely impact public safety. 5. The sign is consistent with the intent of the Master Plan, Urban Design Plan(s), and/or Downtown Birmingham 2016 Report, as applicable. 6. The sign otherwise meets all of this Chapter

8 The Planning Division recommends that the Commission consider a motion to approve the design and sign review application for 394 S. Old Woodward with the following condition; 1. The applicant replace the translucent faces of the box signs with push-thru dimensional letters; 2. The applicant provides the material for the projecting sign. Sample Motion Language Motion to APPROVE the design and sign review application for 394 S. Old Woodward, provided the applicant meet(s) the following condition(s): 1. The applicant replaces the translucent faces of the box signs with push-thru dimensional letters. OR Motion to TABLE the design and sign review application for 394 S. Old Woodward. The applicant must provide the following the following items: 1. OR Motion to DENY the design and sign review application for 394 S. Old Woodward. The proposal does not meet the of section of the Zoning Code. Sec Duties of Design Review Board. The Design Review Board shall review all documents submitted pursuant to this section determining the facts given in this section. (1) All of the materials required by this section have been submitted for review. (2) All provisions of chapter 126 of this Code have been complied with. (3) The appearance, color, texture and materials being used will preserve property values in the immediate neighborhood and will not adversely affect any property values. (4) The appearance of the building exterior will not detract from the general harmony of and is compatible with other buildings already existing in the immediate neighborhood. (5) The appearance of the building exterior will not be garish or otherwise offensive to the sense of sight. (6) The appearance of the building exterior will tend to minimize or prevent discordant and unsightly properties in the city. (7) The total design, including but not limited to colors and materials of all walls, screens, towers, openings, windows, lighting and signs, as well as treatment to be utilized in concealing any exposed mechanical and electrical equipment, is - 3 -

9 compatible with the intent of the urban design plan or such future modifications of that plan as may be approved by the city commission. (Code 1963, 5.192(4)) Article 2, Sign review (b) Restrictions. (1) The Historic District Commission, Design Review Board or Planning Board may impose restrictions on the size, placement and appearance of signs in addition to those set forth by this ordinance. (2) The Historic District Commission, Design Review Board or Planning Board shall not allow the alteration or construction of any sign which would violate the of this ordinance

10 Sign Ordinance Requirements Name Letter/Wall Signs Planning Division Property Address: 394 S. Old Woodward Current Zoning: B-4, Business-Residential Sign Copy: Roche Bobis Maximum Area Required Proposed Review Woodward 1.5 square feet per linear foot. Other 1 square foot per linear foot 60' Total Linear Street Frontage Sign height: 22" Sign width: 117.5" Total sign area: sq. ft. Total Area two signs: sq. ft Maximum Height Other Sign measurements Illumination Name Letter Sign Woodward 3 Other 2 Wall Sign Woodward 4 Other 3 Logos/design elements may be greater than 3 in height subject to approval Thickness = 12 maximum Height from grade = 8 sidewalk Height from grade 15 alley, etc. Non-historic District Steady light only No exposed neon B1 Zone 10:00pm or ½ Hour after close of Business Adj. residential no side or rear lights Historic District As listed above Halo backlighting Exterior light fixtures No internal illumination Sign height:1' 10" Logo height: N/A Sign Thickness: 4.75" Sign Height above grade: 10' 4.25" Internal Illumination

11 # Allowed Principal Wall Sign 1 street = 1 sign 2 streets = 2 identical sgn 3 + streets = each frontage All above can not exceed maximum sign area for building Wall / Name Letter Sign Limited by area per frontage Reviewed by: Matthew Baka Date: August 29, 2014 Two Streets = Two Signs

12 Sign Ordinance Requirements Wall Mounted Projecting Sign Planning Division Property Address: 394 S. Old Woodward Current Zoning: B-2 General Business Sign Copy: Roche Bobis Maximum Area Maximum Height Illumination Required Proposed Review 4.7 sq. ft. per side One side = 7.5 SF Total = 15 SF No more than 12 between sign faces At sign band 8 minimum above street level Non-historic District Steady light only No exposed neon B1 Zone 10:00pm or ½ Hour after close of Business Adj. residential no side or rear lights Historic District As listed above Halo backlighting Exterior light fixtures No internal illumination # Allowed Not allowed within 20 of any other projecting sign, however should not deny any place of business at least 1 projecting sign Additional Provisions Reviewed by: Matthew Baka Date: August 29, 2014 Minimum 6 separation between sign and building Maximum 30 beyond property line Total 9.4 Sq. Ft. At sign band 9' 9" Above Grade N/A Less than 20' from anotehr projecting sign ant a different business 6" separation Less than 30' beyond property line Requirements Requirements Requirements Requirements

13 MEMORANDUM Date: August 27, 2014 To: Design Review Board Members From: Matthew Baka, Senior Planner RE: Sign Review 663 S. Adams Zoning: B-2 General Business Existing Use: Retail Proposal The applicant proposes to install new name letter sign on an existing one-story building. Signage The total linear building frontage is 25, permitting 25 square feet of sign area. The proposed name letter sign will measure 2 h x 9 7 w or 19.2 square feet. In accordance with Article 1.0, section 1.04 (B) of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Combined Sign Area - For all buildings, including multi-tenant office or retail buildings, the combined area of all types of signs shall not exceed 1 square foot (1.5 square feet for addresses on Woodward Avenue) for each linear foot of principal building frontage. The proposal meets this requirement. The wall sign is located at a height of 11 8 on the storefront elevation. In accordance with Article 1.0, Table B of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance - Wall signs that project more than 3 inches from the building facade shall not be attached to the outer wall at a height of less than 8 feet above a public sidewalk and at a height of less than 15 feet above public alley. The proposal meets this requirement. The proposed raceway depth is 4 in accordance with the Sign Ordinance. The total depth of the sign is 9. In accordance with Article 1.0, section 1.05 (K) of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance, No wall signs shall project more than 9 inches measured from the wall to which it is attached to the outer surface. The proposal meets this requirement. The proposed sign consists of LED channel letters representing ORANGE THEORY FITNESS and colored in orange, red and gray. The raceway color is still to be determined. The applicant needs to submit material samples for the proposed sign. Illumination The name letter sign is proposed to be internally illuminated with LED s Sign Recommendation In accordance with Section 86, Article 2, 2.02 (c) of the City of Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Planning Division Sign review approval shall be granted only upon determining the following: 1. The scale, color, texture and materials of the sign being used will identify the business succinctly, and will enhance the building on which it is located, as well as the immediate neighborhood. 2. The scale, color, texture and materials of the sign will be compatible with the style, color, texture and materials of the building on which it is located, as well as neighboring buildings

14 3. The appearance of the building exterior with the signage will preserve or enhance, and not adversely impact, the property values in the immediate neighborhood. 4. The sign is neither confusing nor distracting, nor will it create a traffic hazard or otherwise adversely impact public safety. 5. The sign is consistent with the intent of the Master Plan, Urban Design Plan(s), and/or Downtown Birmingham 2016 Report, as applicable. 6. The sign otherwise meets all of this Chapter. The Planning Division recommends that the Design Review Board consider a motion to approve the proposal for signage on 663 S. Adams. Sample Motion Language Motion to APPROVE the sign review application for 663 S. Adams. The proposal meets the of Section of the Zoning Code. OR Motion to APPROVE the sign review application for 663 S. Adams, provided the applicant meet(s) the following condition(s): OR Motion to TABLE the sign review application for 663 S. Adams. The applicant must provide the following items: 1. OR Motion to DENY the sign review application for 663 S. Adams. The proposal does not meet the of section of the Zoning Code

15 Sec Duties of Design Review Board. The Design Review Board shall review all documents submitted pursuant to this section determining the facts given in this section. (1) All of the materials required by this section have been submitted for review. (2) All provisions of chapter 126 of this Code have been complied with. (3) The appearance, color, texture and materials being used will preserve property values in the immediate neighborhood and will not adversely affect any property values. (4) The appearance of the building exterior will not detract from the general harmony of and is compatible with other buildings already existing in the immediate neighborhood. (5) The appearance of the building exterior will not be garish or otherwise offensive to the sense of sight. (6) The appearance of the building exterior will tend to minimize or prevent discordant and unsightly properties in the city. (7) The total design, including but not limited to colors and materials of all walls, screens, towers, openings, windows, lighting and signs, as well as treatment to be utilized in concealing any exposed mechanical and electrical equipment, is compatible with the intent of the urban design plan or such future modifications of that plan as may be approved by the city commission. (Code 1963, 5.192(4)) Article 2, Sign review (b) Restrictions. (1) The Historic District Commission, Design Review Board or Planning Board may impose restrictions on the size, placement and appearance of signs in addition to those set forth by this ordinance. (2) The Historic District Commission, Design Review Board or Planning Board shall not allow the alteration or construction of any sign which would violate the of this ordinance

16 Sign Ordinance Requirements Name Letter/Wall Signs Planning Division Property Address: 663 S. Adams. Current Zoning: B-2, General Business, Sign Copy: ORANGE THEORY AND FITNESS Maximum Area Maximum Height Other Sign measurements Illumination Required Proposed Review Woodward 1.5 square feet per linear foot. Other 1 square foot per linear foot 25' Total Linear Street Frontage Name Letter Sign Woodward 3 Other 2 Wall Sign Woodward 4 Other 3 Logos/design elements may be greater than 3 in height subject to approval Thickness = 9 maximum Height from grade = 8 sidewalk if over 3 thick Height from grade 15 alley, etc. Non-historic District Steady light only No exposed neon B1 Zone 10:00pm or ½ Hour after close of Business Adj. residential no side or rear lights Historic District As listed above Halo backlighting Exterior light fixtures No internal illumination # Allowed Principal Wall Sign 1 street = 1 sign 2 streets = 2 identical sgn 3 + streets = each frontage Sign height: 2' Sign width: 9' 7" Total sign area: 19.2 sq. ft. Sign height: 2' Logo height:2' 7" Sign Thickness: 9" Sign Height above grade: 11' 8" LED internal illumination One Street = one sign

17 Reviewed by: Matthew Baka Date: August 28, 2014 All above can not exceed maximum sign area for building Wall / Name Letter Sign Limited by area per frontage

18 MEMORANDUM Date: August 29, 2014 To: Design Review Board Members From: Matthew Baka, Senior Planner RE: Sign Review 640 N. Old Woodward Jonna Luxury Homes Zoning: O-2, Office Commercial Existing Use: Retail Clothing Proposal The applicant proposes to install a name letter sign on the back of a two-story, multi-tenant building. There are currently no other signs on the building at this time, with the exception of a small name plate sign. Signage The applicant proposes to install a name letter sign. The total linear building frontage is 40, permitting 40 square feet of sign area. The proposed name letter sign will measure h x w or square feet. In accordance with Article 1.0, section 1.04 (B) of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Combined Sign Area - For all buildings, including multi-tenant office or retail buildings, the combined area of all types of signs shall not exceed 1 square foot (1.5 square feet for addresses on Woodward Avenue) for each linear foot of principal building frontage. The proposal meets this requirement. The wall sign is proposed to be mounted 9 above grade. In accordance with Article 1.0, Table B of the Birmingham Sign Ordinance - Wall signs that project more than 3 inches from the building facade shall not be attached to the outer wall at a height of less than 8 feet above a public sidewalk and at a height of less than 15 feet above public alley. The proposal meets this requirement. The proposed name letter sign will be constructed of ¼ thick black Alupanel. Stacked letters reading Jonna, Luxury Homes will be in height. The Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Table B lists the maximum height of name letter signs at 24. The proposal does not meet this requirement. The proposed sign letters will be stud-mounted ¾ off the face off the wall with stainless steel bolts. Illumination No Illumination is proposed at this time. Sign Recommendation In accordance with Section 86, Article 2, 2.02 (c) of the City of Birmingham Sign Ordinance, Planning Division Sign review approval shall be granted only upon determining the following: 1. The scale, color, texture and materials of the sign being used will identify the business succinctly, and will enhance the building on which it is located, as well as the immediate neighborhood. 2. The scale, color, texture and materials of the sign will be compatible with the style, color, texture and materials of the building on which it is located, as well as neighboring buildings

19 3. The appearance of the building exterior with the signage will preserve or enhance, and not adversely impact, the property values in the immediate neighborhood. 4. The sign is neither confusing nor distracting, nor will it create a traffic hazard or otherwise adversely impact public safety. 5. The sign is consistent with the intent of the Master Plan, Urban Design Plan(s), and/or Downtown Birmingham 2016 Report, as applicable. 6. The sign otherwise meets all of this Chapter. The Planning Division recommends that the Design Review Board consider a motion to approve the sign review application for 568 S. Old Woodward with the following condition; 1. The applicant provide the width of the building; 2. The applicant reduces the height of the sign to 24. Sample Motion Language Motion to APPROVE the 640 N. Old Woodward, provided the applicant meet(s) the following condition(s): 1. The applicant provide the width of the building; 2. The applicant reduces the height of the sign to 24. OR Motion to TABLE the 640 N. Old Woodward. The applicant must provide the following items: 1. OR Motion to DENY the 640 N. Old Woodward. The proposal does not meet the of section of the Zoning Code

20 Sec Duties of Design Review Board. The Design Review Board shall review all documents submitted pursuant to this section determining the facts given in this section. (1) All of the materials required by this section have been submitted for review. (2) All provisions of chapter 126 of this Code have been complied with. (3) The appearance, color, texture and materials being used will preserve property values in the immediate neighborhood and will not adversely affect any property values. (4) The appearance of the building exterior will not detract from the general harmony of and is compatible with other buildings already existing in the immediate neighborhood. (5) The appearance of the building exterior will not be garish or otherwise offensive to the sense of sight. (6) The appearance of the building exterior will tend to minimize or prevent discordant and unsightly properties in the city. (7) The total design, including but not limited to colors and materials of all walls, screens, towers, openings, windows, lighting and signs, as well as treatment to be utilized in concealing any exposed mechanical and electrical equipment, is compatible with the intent of the urban design plan or such future modifications of that plan as may be approved by the city commission. (Code 1963, 5.192(4)) Article 2, Sign review (b) Restrictions. (1) The Historic District Commission, Design Review Board or Planning Board may impose restrictions on the size, placement and appearance of signs in addition to those set forth by this ordinance. (2) The Historic District Commission, Design Review Board or Planning Board shall not allow the alteration or construction of any sign which would violate the of this ordinance

21 Sign Ordinance Requirements Name Letter/Wall Signs Planning Division Property Address: 640 N. Old Woodward Current Zoning: O-2, Office Commercial Sign Copy: Jonna Luxury Homes Maximum Area Maximum Height Other Sign measurements Illumination Required Proposed Review Woodward 1.5 square feet per linear foot. Other 1 square foot per linear foot 40' Total Linear Street Frontage Name Letter Sign Woodward 3 Other 2 Wall Sign Woodward 4 Other 3 Logos/design elements may be greater than 3 in height subject to approval Thickness = 9 maximum Height from grade = 8 sidewalk if over 3 thick Height from grade 15 alley, etc. Non-historic District Steady light only No exposed neon B1 Zone 10:00pm or ½ Hour after close of Business Adj. residential no side or rear lights Historic District As listed above Halo backlighting Exterior light fixtures No internal illumination # Allowed Principal Wall Sign 1 street = 1 sign 2 streets = 2 identical sgn 3 + streets = each frontage Sign height: 38.79" Sign width: 68.96" Total sign area: sq. ft. Sign height: 38.79" Logo height: N/A Sign Thickness:.25" Sign Height above grade: 9' N/A One Street = One Sign Does not meet

22 Reviewed by: Matthew Baka Date: August 29, 2014 All above can not exceed maximum sign area for building Wall / Name Letter Sign Limited by area per frontage

23

24