TO MEMBERS TO THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM
|
|
- Arabella O’Neal’
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Office of the President GB3 TO MEMBERS TO THE COMMITTEE ON : For the Meeting of ACTION ITEM CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, AMENDMENT OF THE LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND APPROVAL OF DESIGN, MOUNT ZION PARKING GARAGE, SAN FRANCISCO CAMPUS CAMPUS PROJECT PROPOSED ACTIONS CONCURRENT ACTION RELEVANT AUTHORITIES: San Francisco Mount Zion Parking Garage at 2420 Sutter Street, San Francisco 1. Certify the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 2. Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Final EIR 3. Adopt the Findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 4. Amend Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) to include the 2420 Sutter Street property as part of the Mount Zion campus site 5. Approve design A related ground lease item is being presented to the Committee on Finance. Regents Policy 8102-Policy on Approval of Design, Long Range Development Plans, and the Administration of the California Environmental Quality Act PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT LOCATION 2420 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA BUILDING PROGRAM 228 total parking spaces 20 accessible parking spaces Seven (7) levels of parking - one below grade and six above Basement Level (B1) Connects to Regents owned parking at 1701 Divisadero Street UCSF Transportation Demand Management Office (approx 600 sf) Motorcycle Parking Bicycle Storage SQUARE FOOTAGE 89,000 Gross Square Feet [GSF] TOTAL PROJECT COST Developer Cost: $15,750,000 Campus Cost: $1,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE Lease Rent: Rental payments will be funded by UCSF Parking System revenue backstopped by Medical Center funds. Purchase Option: External financing of $16,750,000 consisting of tax-exempt debt
2 COMMITTEE ON -2- GB3 BUILDING COST/GSF PROJECT COST/GSF PROJECT COST/SPACE $92.79 per GSF $ per GSF $73,464 per Space RECOMMENDATION The President recommends that, upon review and consideration of the environmental consequences of the proposed project, the Committee on Grounds and Buildings: A. Certify the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). B. Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Final EIR. C. Adopt the Findings set forth in Attachment 6 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) D. Amend the Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) to include the 2420 Sutter Street property as part of the Mount Zion campus site. E. Approve the design of the Mount Zion Parking Garage, San Francisco Campus. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Project Description - below Attachment 2: Privatized Development Budget and Cost Data - below Attachment 3: Project Graphics Attachment 4: Environmental Impact Summary Attachment 5: Complete CEQA documentation Attachment 6: CEQA Findings Attachment 7: Long Range Development Plan -
3 COMMITTEE ON -3- GB3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT 1 A. PROJECT SITE Area Location 14,609 square feet (.34 acres) 2420 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA B. PROJECT CONFORMANCE LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN [LRDP] PHYSICAL DESIGN FRAMEWORK See Section G (below, within this Project Description) regarding proposed LRDP Amendment to include the project site as part of the Mount Zion campus site. Conforms to campus design guidelines contained within the accepted UCSF Campus Physical Design Framework. 1. Responds to the Neighborhood Context: Mediates height difference between neighboring buildings including Russian Center (at 45 ) on one side and medical office building (at 65 ) on the other. Same level of floors above grade as parking structure across the street. Design is meant to be simple and quiet to allow elaborate Russian Center to remain prominent. 2. Welcoming to the community: Façade is composed with a variety of materials for visual interest. Transparency at the street level. Active use (lobby, transportation demand management office) at the ground level. Ceramic tiles with interesting color pattern at ground level along with planters and sidewalk trees. 3. Lead through Conservation and Sustainability See Sustainability features under D Project sized to accommodate patients, visitors and limited essential health care providers, not general staff. Transportation Demand Management office included in structure to provide customer service to Mt. Zion employees. C. PROPOSED PROJECT DESIGN Gross Square Feet [GSF] Building Program 89,000 GSF 228 Total Parking Spaces 20 Accessible Parking Spaces UCSF Transportation Demand Management Office (approx
4 COMMITTEE ON -4- GB3 Number of Floors Key Site Planning and Building Design Elements Exterior Materials Structural System Landscaping Executive Architect D. SUSTAINABILITY Target LEED Rating Key Sustainability Features 600 square feet) Motorcycle Parking (15 spaces) Bicycle Storage (approx. 18 bicycles) Seven Levels (one basement level and six above grade) B1 Level Connects to Regents owned Parking Facility at 1701 Divisadero Street UC is not subject to local zoning regulations, but as a matter of policy, UCSF strives to be consistent with local zoning to the extent feasible. The property is within an NC-3 (Moderate-Scale Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district in which a parking structure would be permitted with conditional use authorization. The design falls within the height and bulk limitations of the San Francisco Planning Code. The structure will be constructed with no setback along the south, west and north sides of the property, and setback 5 feet at the east side of the property. Glass curtain wall Metal panel system and plaster on the south elevation (Sutter Street) Exposed and painted concrete and masonry on the east, west and north elevations. Cast-in-place concrete columns supporting elevated, posttensioned concrete decks. Two trees will be replaced on the sidewalk on Sutter Street and planter boxes with vines will be installed on the 5 th Level on a portion of the north elevation. Gould Evans Baum Thornley, Inc., San Francisco Currently, there is no LEED or equivalent standards for parking structures; nonetheless, this project will employ conservation and sustainability measures to the fullest extent possible. Electric vehicle charging stations Bicycle parking Public transportation information center Natural ventilation on Levels 5 and 6 Energy efficient light fixtures Recycled /re-used materials: - fly ash concrete - perforated metal screen
5 COMMITTEE ON -5- GB3 E. INDEPENDENT REVIEWS Design: UCSF Design Advisory Committee - November 2009 Seismic: Murphy, Burr & Curry - February 2011 Value Engineering: Cambridge CM - January 2011 F. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION Project Delivery Method Management and Oversight Public / Private Partnership with a developer delivering the project under a Parking Facility Lease and Improvement Agreement. The proposed garage, which will be operated by UCSF, is a critical support function for UCSF clinical facilities at Mount Zion. UCSF Real Estate Services will manage the project. The Campus Building Official will issue permits and an Inspector of Record will be retained to inspect construction. The Campus Fire Marshal shall perform plan review and construction inspection for this project to ensure compliance with fire and life safety regulations. The Division of the State Architect (DSA) will approve the construction documents for accessibility requirements. Proposed Schedule Start of Construction: Estimated to be July 2011 Projected Completion of Construction: Estimated to be July 2012 Estimated Construction Duration: 12 months, not to exceed 24 months G. LRDP AMENDMENT Amend Long Range Development Plan to include the 2420 Sutter Street property as part of the Mount Zion campus site. The project site was identified as a Parking Opportunity Site in the 1996 LRDP (Figure 10, pg. 125). It was similarly identified as a potential location for parking in the 1992 UCSF Mount Zion Program Revisions and Associated Building Projects Subsequent EIR. The 1996 LRDP proposed 1.1 million gross square feet of medical uses for the Mount Zion campus site, not including parking. Therefore the proposed project will not reduce amount of space available for medical uses at the Mount Zion site. H. CEQA COMPLIANCE In accordance with CEQA, the environmental effects of the project have been analyzed in the UCSF Mount Zion Garage Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No ) and summarized below:
6 COMMITTEE ON -6- GB3 Environmental Document Tiered from LRDP EIR or Other Previously Certified EIR Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Analysis is not tiered. In November 2010, UC prepared an Initial Study that analyzed the project s potential impacts in all 17 CEQA topic areas. Based on the results of the Initial Study, comments received at the scoping meeting and in response to the Notice of Preparation, the EIR evaluated the following environmental topics in further detail: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use and Planning, Noise, and Transportation and Traffic. Public Review Dates Public comment period on Draft EIR: January 3, February 16, 2011 EIR public hearing date: January 26, 2011 Project-Specific Impacts Reduced to Less than Significant Level with Project Mitigation Impacts/Mitigation Project level: potential archaeological resources Cumulative: None Mitigation Incorporated from 1996 LRDP EIR: Project level: Aesthetics (light and glare) Aesthetics (construction nighttime lighting) Air quality (construction) Hydrology/water quality (construction) Noise (construction) Cumulative: None Project Impacts Adequately Addressed in Previously Certified EIR Significant and Unavoidable Impacts Alternatives Analyzed in EIR Public Comment Letters Not Tiered Project level: None Cumulative: None (1) No Project, (2) Reduced Project, and (3) Alternative Location on Main Hospital Block. In addition, several other alternatives were found to be infeasible and therefore not analyzed, including (1) Alternate Location on Post Street alternative, and (2) Enhanced TDM Program. Public Agency: None Individuals: One (Ernest McNabb, adjacent property owner)
7 COMMITTEE ON -7- GB3 Environmental Topic Area Issues Raised in Comments and How They Were Resolved Commenter alleges UC is not constitutionally exempt from local land use in this case because it does not currently own or lease the property, and lacks jurisdiction to conduct environmental review. UCSF responded that it proposes to lease the site (with an option to purchase the property following construction), and that preparation of the EIR in compliance with CEQA is required prior to approving the project, including executing the lease. Response also cites CEQA Guidelines defining lead agency. Commenter alleges the project was piecemealed from the Osher Building project. UCSF responded that at the time the EIR and EIR Addendum for the Osher Building were prepared, there was no immediate plan to develop a proposed parking structure at the project site, and the project was not reasonably foreseeable. No piecemealing has occurred. Commenter alleges that UCSF began implementing the development process for the project before completing the CEQA process, and because of its investment is predisposed to support the project, precluding informed and reasoned decision-making. UCSF responded that based on the UC CEQA Handbook, design approval is typically the point at which a project is approved, which has not yet occurred for this project. University development projects are subject to budget and capital planning cycles and schedules that often require authorization for preliminary funding for planning and feasibility purposes months or years before University approval of the proposed project. This is true for the proposed Mount Zion parking garage. Commenter makes numerous comments about the lack of justification for the garage and/or alleged errors in parking data collection that do not support justification of the garage. These comments do not address environmental issues or the adequacy of the EIR, but were responded to appropriately in the Responses to Comments document. Commenter alleges that the EIR failed to consider other projects in the vicinity in the impacts analysis, including the Westside Renaissance project and the potential use of the commenter s vacant property to the north at 2655 Bush Street as a nursing home. UCSF responded that no formal applications with the City of San Francisco for these developments have been made and that these two projects are not reasonably foreseeable within the construction timeframe of the proposed project and are speculative. The development of the property to the north at 2655 Bush
8 COMMITTEE ON -8- GB3 Street is entitled for demolition of the existing building and new construction of residential units. This future project has been accounted for in the impacts analysis. Commenter alleges that the project is not consistent with the City of San Francisco Transit First Policy. UCSF responded that UCSF is not subject to but strives to be consistent with the City of San Francisco Transit First Policy. Sixty-five percent (65%) of the existing Mount Zion employees already access the site via alternative transportation. The parking structure is intended for use by patients many of whom are seriously ill, and coming to Mount Zion for treatment at the Comprehensive Cancer Center, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine or the dialysis center. Many Mount Zion patients are coming from outside the Bay Area for medical treatment. Parking is also intended for essential health care professionals who may need to access multiple UCSF sites and cannot be accommodated in a time efficient manner by UCSF existing shuttle system. The Transit First Policy does not prohibit parking garages, and therefore the project is not inconsistent with this Policy. Commenter raises issues regarding construction-period impacts on the potential nursing home use on his property, including impacts of construction vibration, dust and noise. The commenter also raised concerns about hazardous materials in soils, potential shadows, and operational impacts of light and glare. UCSF adequately responded to these comments in the Responses to Comments document. Commenter alleges that the EIR does not adequately analyze future departmental moves from Parnassus to Mount Zion. UCSF responded that a much larger development envelope for Mount Zion was analyzed under CEQA and included in the current LRDP. Commenter requests additional information about alternatives to the project that were studied or pursued. Commenter also makes suggestions for alternatives to the proposed project. These comments were adequately responded to in the Response to Comments document. Mitigation Monitoring Program See attachment 5 Final Environmental Document See attachment 5 Findings See attachment 6 Project Level Statement of No Overriding Considerations
9 COMMITTEE ON -9- GB3 ATTACHMENT 2 PRIVATIZED DEVELOPMENT BUDGET MATERIAL PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION ONLY. [COMMITTEE ON FINANCE REVIEWED THE TERMS BELOW AT THE MARCH 2011 MEETING.] A. COSTS Category Total % of Total DEVELOPER COSTS Building Cost $8,258, % Developer s Hard Cost Contingency 375, % (structural steel escalation and tieback at $250,000; only paid if incurred) Soft Costs - Consultants 836, % Testing & Inspection 298, % Permit & Impact Fees 278, % Legal 145, % Financing & Appraisal Fees 178, % Property Tax and Insurance 113, % Developer Overhead 475, % Soft Cost Contingency 165, % Land Cost 3,400, % Interest 657, % Development Fee 567, % Sub-Total $15,750, % CAMPUS COSTS Parking Equipment $367, % Parking Security Systems 150, % IT Cabling and Equipment 100, % Way-finding Signage 80, % UCSF Environmental Review 80, % Transportation Impact Analysis 33, % CEQA Legal Review Outside Counsel 30, % UCSF Internal Recharges 100, % Feasibility / Construction Peer Review 10, % Printing & Reimbursables 5, % Cost of Issuance 5, % Contingency 38, % Sub-Total $1,000, % Project Total $16,750, %
10 COMMITTEE ON -10- GB3 ATTACHMENT 2 [CONT] DEVELOPMENT COST DATA A. ANALYTICAL DATA Gross Square Feet (GSF) 89,000 Assignable Square Feet (ASF) NA Efficiency ratio: ASF/GSF NA Building Cost/GSF $92.79 Number of Spaces 228 Building Cost/Parking Space $36,259 Project Cost/GSF $ Project Cost/Parking Space $73,464 B. COMPARABLE UNIVERSITY PROJECTS (CCCI 5624) NOTE: In March 2011, the Committee on Finance approved the lease with option to purchase and finance action for this project in closed session. The following challenges and constraints directly affect the cost and delivery of this project: Constrained Urban Infill Site dimensions and access Below Grade Connection with 1701 Divisadero, which requires a specific depth requirement Need for excavation, shoring and underpinning of three adjacent buildings Inefficient Below Grade Dimensional Constraints not able to double load the parking Infill Site = need to mechanically ventilate Levels B1 through 4 Compliance with City s Bulk Requirements = inefficient parking layout at top level Construction Constraints no lay-down, access from one side of site only, busy two-way urban street with active parking garage entrance across the street Accessible Parking Requirement for Outpatient Use (10%) Campus Project Name Building Cost/GSF Building Cost/Space Project Cost/ Space Date of Last Approved CIB Berkeley Underhill Parking Garage $113 $27,973 $39,006 7/5/2005 San Francisco Mission Bay Building 21A Parking Garage $86 $28, 048 $38,003 4/15/2004 San Francisco Mission Bay Bldg. 23B Parking Structure $84 $25, 314 $38,485 6/17/2003
TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM
GB1 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: For the Meeting of May 20, 2015 ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF EXTERNAL FINANCING, CLINICAL SCIENCES
More informationI. CONSIDERATION OF 2020 LRDP FEIR (1/05) AND ADDENDUM #8 1
ATTACHMENT 5 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT #2 TO THE 2020 LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN -- CAMPUS SPACE AND INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER, AND APPROVAL
More information101 B. COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS January 18, 2001
COMMITTEE ON 101 B B. CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND APPROVAL OF DESIGN, SOUTHWEST CAMPUS HOUSING AND PARKING PHASE 1, LOS ANGELES CAMPUS The President recommends that upon review and
More informationTO MEMBERS TO THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM CONSENT
Office of the President GB1C TO MEMBERS TO THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: For the Meeting of ACTION ITEM CONSENT ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, ADOPTION OF FINDINGS, ACCEPTANCE OF
More informationSUMMARY University of California San Francisco Institute for Regeneration Medicine
SUMMARY University of California San Francisco Institute for Regeneration Medicine Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (State Clearinghouse No. 2008022027) March 2008 INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATION
More informationADDENDUM #4 TO THE UCSF 2014 LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
University of California San Francisco Real Estate, Planning, & Capital Programs ADDENDUM #4 TO THE UCSF 2014 LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The Joan and Sanford I. Weill Neurosciences
More informationCEQA FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS BUILDING PROJECT, LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY
ATTACHMENT 4 CEQA FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS BUILDING PROJECT, LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY I. CONSIDERATION OF THE 2006 LRDP EIR AND INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS
More informationSUMMARY. Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Academic Building, Mission Bay Block 25A State Clearinghouse Number
ATTACHMENT 5 SUMMARY Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Academic Building, Mission Bay Block 25A State Clearinghouse Number 2012062042 Project Location and Description UCSF proposes the construction
More informationUC CEQA CHECKLIST TEMPLATE INSTRUCTIONS & GLOSSARY
A. Introduction UC CEQA CHECKLIST TEMPLATE A project is an activity or transaction that may result in an environmental effect that is being approved or carried out by the University, and may consist of
More informationTO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM CONSENT
Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: For the Meeting of November 16, 2016 ACTION ITEM CONSENT APPROVAL OF THE NON-STATE BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF EXTERNAL FINANCING,
More informationTO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM
GB2 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: For Meeting of May 14, 2014 ACTION ITEM AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM,
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO REVELLE COLLEGE APARTMENTS AND COMMONS DINING RENOVATION PROJECT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO REVELLE COLLEGE APARTMENTS AND COMMONS DINING RENOVATION PROJECT FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2008101108)
More information2.1 Project Definition/Classification/Initial Study Project Definition
2.1 Project Definition/Classification/Initial Study 2.1.1 Project Definition The correct and complete definition of all reasonably foreseeable elements of a proposed project is the single most important
More informationFrom: City of Santa Cruz, Planning Dept., 809 Center Street, Room 206, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
CITY OF SANTA CRUZ Notice of Exemption To: Clerk of the Board Office of Planning and Research County of Santa Cruz 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Governmental Center Sacramento, CA 95814 701 Ocean Street
More informationI. CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR
CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, FINDINGS AND APPROVALS OF THE AMENDMENT OF THE LRDP AND DESIGN OF TWO UNDERHILL AREA PROJECTS: CENTRAL DINING AND OFFICE FACILITY AND, BERKELEY CAMPUS
More information2014 LRDP Impacts and Mitigation Measures
CHAPTER 5 2014 LRDP Impacts and Mitigation Measures 5.0 Components of the 2014 LRDP 5.0.1 Introduction This LRDP EIR evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposed 2014 Long Range Development Plan
More informationCALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE SEGUNDO INFILL HOUSING PROJECT, DAVIS CAMPUS
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE SEGUNDO INFILL HOUSING PROJECT, DAVIS CAMPUS I. ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR WOODLAND RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PARK SPECIFIC PLAN FOCUS OF INPUT NOP RESPONSES
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR WOODLAND RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PARK SPECIFIC PLAN To: Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties From: Erika
More informationI. CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR FOR AMENDMENT # 2 TO THE LRDP
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT #2, HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, I. CERTIFICATION
More informationCHAPTER 3: DESIGN. TN Higher Education Designers Manual October 2018 Page 1 of 12
3.01 GENERAL A. Design the project to meet the authorized scope, budget, and schedule. B. Upon initiation of the project, arrange to review with the Owner the service and administrative requirements as
More informationExhibit C: Design Review & Document Approval Procedures
Exhibit C: Design Review & Document Approval Procedures 1. INTRODUCTION This Kendall Square Urban Renewal Plan Design Review and Document Approval Procedure, (DRDAP) sets forth the procedure for design
More informationUC Davis Medical Center Education Building Project Phase 2 Telemedicine Resource Center and Rural PRIME Facility January CEQA Findings
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE EDUCATION BUILDING PROJECT, PHASE 2 (TELEMEDICINE RESOURCE CENTER AND RURAL PRIME FACILTY PROJECT) DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.0 INTRODUCTION This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) evaluates the potential for the San Joaquin Apartments and Precinct Improvements Project (the project or San Joaquin Apartments project to result
More informationThe following Findings are hereby adopted by The Regents in conjunction with the approval of the project which is set forth in Section III below.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR, FINDINGS, AND APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE SURGERY AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PAVILION, DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER
More informationThese findings and the Mitigation Monitoring Program ( MMP, attached as Exhibit B) address only the impacts of the West Branch Library Project.
Page 1 of 6 FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES, ALTERNATIVES AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE BERKELEY WEST BRANCH LIBRARY PROJECT INTRODUCTION: The Berkeley Branch
More informationFirst and foremost, alternatives in an EIR must be potentially feasible. In the context of CEQA, feasible is defined as:
ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT 5.0 5.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS CEQA requires that an EIR analyze a reasonable range of feasible alternatives that meet most or all project objectives while reducing or avoiding
More informationEnvironmental and Development Services Department Planning Division San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito, CA (510) FAX: (510)
Environmental and Development Services Department Planning Division 10890 San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 215-4330 - FAX: (510) 233-5401 N O T I C E O F P R E P A R A T I O N DATE: April 4,
More informationPERMITTED USES: Within the MX Mixed Use District the following uses are permitted:
6.24 - MX - MIXED USE DISTRICT 6.24.1 INTENT: The purpose of the MX Mixed Use District is to accommodate the development of a wide-range of residential and compatible non-residential uses (including major
More informationDelaware Street
A t t a c h m e n t 1 F i n d i n g s a n d C o n d i t i o n s 2004-06 Delaware Street Use Permit #09-10000052 JULY 22, 2010 CEQA FINDINGS 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
More information5.0 ALTERNATIVE VARIATIONS
5.0 ALTERNATIVE VARIATIONS 5.1 INTRODUCTION The Draft EIR for the Beverly Hilton Revitalization Plan evaluated five alternatives to the project, pursuant to Section 15126.6 of the California Environmental
More informationCALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE MUSIC BUILDING PROJECT
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE MUSIC BUILDING PROJECT I. APPROVAL OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Title 14, California
More informationFINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1. NBC Universal Evolution Plan ENV EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO Council District 4
Division of Land / Environmental Review City Hall 200 N. Spring Street, Room 750 Los Angeles, CA 90012 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1 ENV-2007-0254-EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2007071036 Council
More informationADOPTION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE SCIENCES LABORATORY BUILDING AND LECTURE HALL, DAVIS CAMPUS I. ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
More informationSan Francisco Water Power Sewer Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco Water Power Sewer Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 525 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 T 415.554.3155 F 415.554.3161 TTY 415.554.3488 September
More informationAttachment 3 UC MERCED 2020 PROJECT
Attachment 3 UC MERCED 2020 PROJECT Addendum No. 6 to the 2009 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report The following Addendum has been prepared
More informationHASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW. Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and Approval of the Long Range Campus Plan
HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and Approval of the Long Range Campus Plan Agenda Item #3 Agenda Item: 3 Board of Directors July 14, 2016 ACTION ITEM
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This Environmental Impact Report (EIR) evaluates the impacts of the proposed West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill (WCCSL) Bulk Materials Processing Center (BMPC) land use permit amendment
More informationHALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER B-201 RESPECTING THE BUILDING CODE
HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BY-LAW NUMBER B-201 RESPECTING THE BUILDING CODE BE IT ENACTED by the Council of the Halifax Regional Municipality under the authority of the Building Code Act as follows:
More informationDelaware Street
A t t a c h m e n t 1 F i n d i n g s a n d C o n d i t i o n s 2004-06 Delaware Street Use Permit #09-10000052 APRIL 22, 2010 CEQA FINDINGS 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
More informationTO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM CONSENT
Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: For the Meeting of November 16, 2016 ACTION ITEM CONSENT APPROVAL OF THE NON-STATE BUDGET, CENTER FOR THE HEALTH SCIENCES
More informationMAXINE HALL HEALTH CENTER RENOVATION AND SEISMIC UPGRADE
MAXINE HALL HEALTH CENTER RENOVATION AND SEISMIC UPGRADE CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW - PHASE 1 - JUNE 19, 2017 CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH PROJECT LOCATION: 1301 Pierce Street San
More informationRE: Letter of Intent Land Use Application for Plan Commission and UDC Initial/ Final Approval Request
TO: City of Madison Planning Division 126 S. Hamilton Street Madison, WI 53701 Jessica Vaughn Department of Planning & Development City of Madison 126 S. Hamilton Street Madison, WI 53701 RE: Letter of
More informationREPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento
REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramento.org 9 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission PUBLIC HEARING April 16,
More informationSECTION 5: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
SECTION 5: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT 5.1 - Introduction In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, this Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) contains a comparative impact
More informationTOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of February 6, 2017 Agenda Item 5C
TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT For the meeting of February 6, 2017 Agenda Item 5C Owner: David Jones Design Professional: Mark Groody Project Address: 12 Austin Avenue Assessor s
More informationDESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING Multi family housing is an increasingly popular form of infill development in Shaker Heights because of the city s built out
More information5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.1 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines state that an EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project, or to the location of the Project, which
More informationMONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
MONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Meeting: February 10, 2004 @ 9:45 AM Agenda Item D-7 Project Description: Combined Development Permit (Shachmut; PLN040627) consisting a Coastal Administrative Permit
More informationFindings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Pursuant to Sections 21081 and 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines Creative Arts & Holloway
More informationA PPEARANCE REVIEW BOARD
ARB Staff Report A PPEARANCE REVIEW BOARD July 21, 2016 Case Number AGENDA ITEM 4 619, 621, 623 E. PINE ST. THE OLIVE TOWNHOMES ARB2016-00037 Applicant Michael Wenrich Michael Wenrich Architects Owner
More informationChristy Usher, AICP Associate Planner Phone Fax:
Item No: 2 Meeting Date: March 12, 2013 To: Planning Commission Date: March 7, 2013 Authorized By: Ron Munekawa Chief of Planning By: Christy Usher, AICP Associate Planner Phone 650 522-7215 Fax: 522-7201
More informationCity Manager s Recommendation: That the City Council take the following action:
City Council Successor Agency Housing Authority Reclamation Authority Joint Powers Authority Date: May 9, 2018 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council William K. Tam, City Manager Issue:
More informationU S E P E R M I T. CITY OF BERKELEY ZONING ORDINANCE Berkeley Municipal Code Title 23 USE PERMIT # MODUP c/o The Austin Group LLC
Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning U S E P E R M I T CITY OF BERKELEY ZONING ORDINANCE Berkeley Municipal Code Title 23 USE PERMIT # MODUP2014-0001 Property Address: Permittee Name:
More informationArchitectural Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 Subject:
More informationSpecial Land Use Permit Application Planning Division
Special Land Use Permit Application Planning Division Form will not be processed until it is completely filled out. 1. Applicant Name:_ Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email address: 3. Applicant s
More informationSECTION 8. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
SECTION 8. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 8.1 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS PURPOSE STATEMENTS 8.2 PERMITTED AND SPECIAL USES 8.3 BULK AND SETBACK REGULATIONS 8.4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 8.5 GENERAL
More informationArchitectural Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 Subject:
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THE DRAFT EIR 1-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION This Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR or EIR) has been prepared for the 1020 S. Figueroa Street Project (the Project). Jia Yuan USA Co., Inc., the Applicant, proposes to develop
More informationSpecial Land Use Permit Application Planning Division Form will not be processed until it is completely filled out.
Special Land Use Permit Application Planning Division Form will not be processed until it is completely filled out. 1. Applicant Name:_ Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email address: 3. Applicants Attorney/Contact
More information65 East Project (P18-045) Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report
65 East Project (P18-045) Addendum to an Environmental Impact Report File Number/Project Name: 65 East Project (P18-045) Project Location and Surrounding Land Uses: The proposed project site consists of
More informationThe ARDEN Group Development Standards 05/17/13 Rezoning Petition No (University City Auto Mall) Site Development Data:
The ARDEN Group Development Standards 05/17/13 Rezoning Petition No. 2013-052 (University City Auto Mall) Site Development Data: --Site Acreage: +/- 39 Ac. --Tax Parcel #: 047-23-108 --Existing Zoning:
More informationSTAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 28, 2018 FILE NO: SUP AGENDA ITEM: E.2
STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 28, 2018 FILE NO: SUP-18-022 AGENDA ITEM: E.2 STAFF CONTACT: Kathe Green, Assistant Planner AGENDA TITLE: For Possible Action: To consider a request
More informationUCSF Parnassus Campus Institute For Regeneration Medicine 18 March 2008
UCSF Parnassus Campus Institute For Regeneration Medicine 18 March 2008 Institute for Regeneration Medicine IRM Goals Foster groundbreaking research in stem cell biology, cell differentiation, and tissue
More informationORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map.
ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section 12.04 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section. Section 12.04 of the
More informationEl Dorado Avenue
A t t a c h m e n t 1 F i n d i n g s a n d C o n d i t i o n s 1995-1999 El Dorado Avenue Use Permit #08-10000055 JULY 10, 2008 CEQA FINDINGS 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions
More informationCITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF LOMPOC PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: JULY 9, 2008 TO: FROM: MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION KEITH C. NEUBERT, PRINCIPAL PLANNER RE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW DR 08-03 AGENDA ITEM
More informationResolution affirming the Planning Department's certification of the Final Environmental
FILE NO. AMENDED IN COMMITTEE // RESOLUTION NO - 0 [California Environmental Quality Act Findings - Seawall Lot and Pier Mixed-Use Project] Resolution affirming the Planning Department's certification
More informationCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: Agenda Item No: No. 3 Staff Contact: Scott Drapkin, Planning Manager (949) 497-0362 sdrapkin@lagunabeachcity.net Project
More informationADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (AFTER PREQUALIFICATION)
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (AFTER PREQUALIFICATION) Subject to conditions prescribed by the University of California, San Francisco (the University or UCSF ), bids for a Construction Manager at Risk Agreement
More informationPERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Sections: 9-101 Purpose 9-102 Performance Standards - District "AG" 9-103 Performance Standards - Districts R-1, "R-2", "R-3" and "V-1" 9-104 Performance Standards - Conditional Uses 9-101 Purpose: The
More informationSECTIONFIVE. Comments and Responses to Comments
Comment Letter-C 1 Comment Letter-C (cont d) 1 2 3 4 Comment Letter-C (cont d) 4 5 6 7 Comment Letter-C (cont d) 8 9 SECTIONFIVE Comments and Responses to Comments Response to Comment Letter C 1. The comments
More informationINITIAL STUDY UCSF 2014 LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
University of California San Francisco Campus Planning Financial and Administrative Services INITIAL STUDY UCSF 2014 LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Lead Agency The University of California Prepared by UCSF
More informationHealth Sciences Graduate Student Housing Project Tiered Environmental Impact Report (SCH No ) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section is an executive summary of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Health Sciences Graduate Student Housing project,
More informationREPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento
REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramnto.org 9 PUBLIC HEARING November 17, 2016 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission
More informationChapter 4. Environmental Setting and Impacts 4. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACTS
4. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACTS INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the existing environmental conditions in the Seawall Lot 337 and Pier 48 Mixed- Use Project (Mission Rock Project or proposed project)
More informationDRAFT FOCUSED TIERED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. Conference Center, Hotel, and Graduate School of Management Building University of California, Davis
DRAFT FOCUSED TIERED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Conference Center, Hotel, and Graduate School of Management Building University of California, Davis Prepared for: University of California, Davis Office
More information1530 Grizzly Peak Blvd. Lot 598
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION JULY 12, 2012 1530 Grizzly Peak Blvd. Lot 598 Use Permit #11-10000016 to construct a two-story, 3,183 square foot single-family
More informationCALIFORNIA NATIONAL PRIMATE RESEARCH CENTER RESPIRATORY DISEASES CENTER PROJECT
CALIFORNIA NATIONAL PRIMATE RESEARCH CENTER RESPIRATORY DISEASES CENTER PROJECT Final Focused Tiered Environmental Impact Report Prepared By: ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY University of
More informationSECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project
SECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project 6.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT CEQA requires that an EIR include an analysis of a range of project alternatives that could feasibly attain most
More informationHodgson Road. Randolph Road Variable Public Right of Way VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE. 50' Public Right of Way
Site Development Data: MPV Properties Development Standards 07/18/18 Rezoning Petition No. 2018-061 --Acreage: ± 2.192 acres --Tax Parcel #: portion of 185-033-01 --Existing Zoning: R-3 --Proposed Zoning:
More informationAppendix H. Millennium Hollywood Project Trip Cap and Mitigation Triggers
Appendix H Millennium Hollywood Project Trip Cap and Mitigation Triggers MILLENNIUM HOLLYWOOD PROJECT TRIP CAP AND MITIGATION TRIGGERS Crain and Associates Introduction The Millennium Hollywood Project
More informationNew Commercial Construction Permit
New Commercial Construction Permit Zoning requirements Staff recommends always verifying the zoning requirements for your project before deciding to build. Warrensburg has eleven separate zoning districts,
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 1, 2015 Agenda Item: 7.6 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Grace Page, ARB Liaison Steve Traeger, Principal Urban
More information6.1 SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT
SECTION 6.0 ALTERNATIVES CEQA requires that an EIR identify alternatives to a project as it is proposed. The CEQA Guidelines specify that the EIR should identify alternatives which would feasibly attain
More informationLDR RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE C.O.W. January 19, 2017
LDR 2017-01 RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE C.O.W. January 19, 2017 SECTION NO. SECTION TITLE COMPLEXITY DESCRIPTION 1. 16.20.010.5. Maximum development potential Problem Statement:
More information6 ALTERNATIVES 6.1 INTRODUCTION
6 ALTERNATIVES 6.1 INTRODUCTION Environmental impact reports (EIRs) are required to consider alternatives to the project that are capable of reducing or avoiding significant environmental impacts. Section
More informationRESOLUTION NO.15- The Planning Commission of the City of La Habra does hereby resolve as follows:
RESOLUTION NO.15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA CERTIFYING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 14-02 FOR A 32 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: July 31, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.8 Russell Bunim, Associate Planner Stephanie Reich,
More informationSpecial Use Permit Application Martin Street Property
Special Use Permit Application Martin Street Property Submitted to City of Reno February 08, 2016 Prepared for PCD Asset Group 2760 Camino Diablo Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared by Martin Street Property
More informationPlanning Commission Agenda Item
Planning Commission Agenda Item TO: THRU: FROM: Chair Gladson and Members of the Planning Commission Anna Pehoushek Assistant Community Development Director Monique Schwartz Assistant Planner SUBJECT PUBLIC
More informationSAN CITY OF CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY
COUNCIL AGENDA: 06/14/16 ITEM: j a SAN CITY OF IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: Harry Freitas SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: May 31, 2016 Approved Date (,(i tv»
More informationFIFTH ADDENDUM TO THE CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN EIR APRIL 2015
FIFTH ADDENDUM TO THE CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN EIR APRIL 2015 CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1685 MAIN STREET SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 INTRODUCTION This document is the Fifth Addendum
More informationCERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR
FINDINGS, AND APPROVAL OF DESIGN FOR THE CENTER FOR COMPANION ANIMAL HEALTH PROJECT, DAVIS CAMPUS CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR FOR THE VETERINARY MEDICINE FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT I. CERTIFICATION
More informationEnvironmental Setting, Impacts, Standard Conditions of Approval, and Mitigation Measures
CHAPTER 4 Environmental Setting, Impacts, Standard Conditions of Approval, and Mitigation Measures This Draft EIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA, as amended (Public Resources Code Section 21000,
More informationAgenda (Items may be taken out of order)
I. ROLL CALL LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES FACILITIES MASTER PLANNING & OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Educational Services Center Board Room 770 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90017
More informationFacebook Campus Project. City Council Study Session January 31, 2012
Facebook Campus Project City Council Study Session January 31, 2012 Meeting Purpose Opportunity for the City Council to become familiar with project and reports released to date Opportunity for the City
More informationArchitectural Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 Subject:
More informationMenlo Park Planning Commission Draft EIR Public Hearing June 20, 2016
Menlo Park Planning Commission Draft EIR Public Hearing June 20, 2016 1 Purpose of Hearing Introduction to EIR Project Team Project Overview Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Impacts and Mitigation
More informationHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC & PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue January 15, 2015
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC2014-00576 & PLNHLC2014-00823 171 East 3 rd Avenue January 15, 2015 Applicant: Fernando Silva Staff: Katia Pace (801) 535-6354 or
More information