MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS GEORGE BAKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FACILITY ENERGY REPORT 139 WEST MAPLE AVENUE MOORESTOWN, NJ 08057

Transcription

1 MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS GEORGE BAKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 139 WEST MAPLE AVENUE MOORESTOWN, NJ FACILITY ENERGY REPORT

2 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST... 2 II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION... 7 III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST... 9 IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS Appendix A ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown Appendix B New Jersey Smart Start Program Incentives Appendix C Portfolio Manager Statement of Energy Performance Appendix D Major Equipment List Appendix E Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix F Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 1 of 30

3 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Electric Utility Rate Structure: Third Party Supplier: Natural Gas Utility Provider: Utility Rate Structure: Third Party Supplier: Public Service Electric & Gas Large Power & Lighting Secondary (LPLS) South Jersey Energy Company Public Service Electric & Gas Large Volume Gas (LVG) Hess The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy. October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 2 of 30

4 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Table 1 Electricity Billing Data ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY Utility Provider: PSE&G Rate: BPL / LPLS Meter No: Unmetered / Account # Third Party Utility Provider: South Jersey Energy Company TPS Meter / Acct No: - MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH DEMAND KW TOTAL BILL Sep-10 35, $7,804 Oct-10 34, $5,642 Nov-10 32, $5,250 Dec-10 63, $10,264 Jan-11 48, $7,312 Feb-11 35, $5,675 Mar-11 28, $4,833 Apr-11 33, $5,169 May-11 35, $7,663 Jun-11 22, $4,730 Jul-11 18, $3,797 Aug-11 38, $7,394 Totals 427, Max $75,531 AVERAGE DEMAND KW average AVERAGE RATE $0.177 $/kwh October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 3 of 30

5 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 4 of 30

6 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Table 4 Natural Gas Billing Data NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY Utility Provider: PSE&G Rate: LVG Meter No: Point of Delivery ID: PG Third Party Utility Provider: Hess TPS Meter No: / MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL Sep $99.39 Oct $ Nov-10 1, $1, Dec-10 3, $3, Jan-11 3, $3, Feb-11 4, $4, Mar-11 2, $2, Apr $ May $99.58 Jun $98.03 Jul $97.65 Aug $99.50 TOTALS 16, $17, AVERAGE RATE: $1.05 $/THERM October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 5 of 30

7 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 6 of 30

8 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION The George Baker Elementary School is located on 139 West Maple Avenue in Moorestown, New Jersey. The 50,680 SF George Baker Elementary School was built in 1952 with additions in 1989 and The building is single story building and is comprised of office space for administrative use, gymnasiums, classrooms, an auditorium, a cafeteria, kitchen and mechanical rooms. Occupancy Profile The typical hours of operation for George Baker Elementary School are Monday through Friday between 8:00 am and 3:00 pm, with custodial services running until 8:00 pm. The elementary school has a 12 month administrative occupancy of 60 people and 10 month occupancy with students of 410. Building Envelope Exterior walls for the George Baker Elementary School are brick faced with a concrete block construction. The amount of insulation within the walls is unknown. The windows throughout the elementary school are in good condition and appear to be maintained. Typical windows throughout the elementary school are double pane, ¼ clear glass with aluminum frames. Blinds are utilized throughout the school per occupant comfort. The blinds are valuable because they help to reduce heat loss in the winter and reduce solar heat in the summer. The roof is a flat, built up rubber roof where the HVAC equipment resides. The amount of insulation below the roof is unknown. HVAC Systems The media center is conditioned by two 5-ton York packaged rooftop units with direct expansion coils and hot water heat from baseboard and unit ventilators. The multi-purpose room is conditioned by four air handling units which are equipped with hot water and direct expansion coils. The cooling coils in these air handlers are set up for 2-stages of cooling and each air handler is combined with two Rheem condensing units. The classroom wings and offices are conditioned by unit ventilators with hot water and direct expansion coils. Heating Hot Water for the building is generated by a boiler plant fitted with two H.B. Smith 28A-8 cast iron sectional boilers. The boilers are natural gas fired with input rating of 2,499 MBH and output rating of 1,965. The boilers are all equipped with Power Flame Burners. Heating water is circulated via two 7.5 horsepower Taco pumps. For further clarification of which areas are being supplied by certain systems, refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix. October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 7 of 30

9 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Exhaust System Air is exhausted from the toilet rooms through the roof exhausters. HVAC System Controls The George Baker Elementary School is controlled by a Niagara Tridium controls system. Supplemental cooling systems are controlled by individual thermostat. Domestic Hot Water Domestic hot water for the George Baker Elementary School is provided by one Bradford White 4.5 KW electric domestic water heater with an integrated storage capacity of 80 gallons. The kitchen for George Baker has a separate domestic hot water system provided by a Bradford White 4.5 KW electric domestic water heater with an integrated storage capacity of 119 gallons. Lighting Refer to the Investment Grade lighting Audit Appendix for a detailed list of the lighting throughout the facility and estimated operating hours per space. October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 8 of 30

10 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix. Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility. October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 9 of 30

11 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed: Table 1 ECM Financial Summary ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's) ECM NO. DESCRIPTION NET INSTALLATION COST A ANNUAL SAVINGS B SIMPLE PAYBACK (Yrs) SIMPLE LIFETIME ROI ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade - General $45,090 $8, % ECM #2 Lighting Upgrade - Media Center $2,240 $ % ECM #3 Lighting Upgrade - Exterior $2,600 $ % ECM #4 Lighting Controls Upgrade $13,560 $3, % ECM #5 AC Unit Upgrades $116,576 $8, % ECM #6 Boiler Upgrade $137,178 $3, % ECM #7 Domestic Hot Water Heater Upgrades $49,500 $11, % ECM #8 NEMA Premium Motor Replacement $3,762 $ % RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's) ECM NO. DESCRIPTION NET INSTALLATION COST ANNUAL SAVINGS SIMPLE PAYBACK (Yrs) SIMPLE LIFETIME ROI REM # KW PV System $177,007 $12, % Notes: A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives. B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings. October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 10 of 30

12 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Table 2 ECM Energy Summary ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's) ECM NO. ELECTRIC DEMAND (KW) ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION (KWH) ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade - General ,607 0 ECM #2 Lighting Upgrade - Media Center 1 1,394 0 ECM #3 Lighting Upgrade - Exterior 0.9 3,552 0 ECM #4 Lighting Controls Upgrade ,703 0 ECM #5 AC Unit Upgrades ,571 0 ECM #6 Boiler Upgrade ,079 ECM #7 Domestic Hot Water Heater Upgrades ,791-2,689 ECM #8 NEMA Premium Motor Replacement 1.0 4,137 0 RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's) ECM NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION ELECTRIC DEMAND (KW) ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION (KWH) NATURAL GAS (THERMS) NATURAL GAS (THERMS) REM # KW PV System ,196 0 October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 11 of 30

13 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Table 3 Facility Project Summary ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ANNUAL ENERGY SAVINGS ($) PROJECT COST ($) SMART START INCENTIVES CUSTOMER COST SIMPLE PAYBACK Lighting Upgrade - General $8,780 $47,410 $2,320 $45, Lighting Upgrade - Media Center $247 $2,240 $0 $2, Lighting Upgrade - Exterior $629 $2,600 $0 $2, Lighting Controls Upgrade $3,841 $14,900 $1,340 $13, AC Unit Upgrades $8,066 $121,038 $4,462 $116, Boiler Upgrade $3,233 $141,178 $4,000 $137, Domestic Hot Water Heater Upgrades NEMA Premium Motor Replacement Design / Construction Extras (15%) $11,122 $50,000 $500 $49, $529 $3,942 $180 $3, $0 $57,496 $0 $57,496 Total Project $36,447 $440,803 $12,802 $428, Design / Construction Extras is shown as an additional cost for the facility project summary. This cost is included to estimate the costs associated with construction management fees for a larger combined project. October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 12 of 30

14 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker ECM #1: Lighting Upgrade General Description: The majority of the interior lighting throughout George Baker Elementary School is provided with fluorescent fixtures with 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. In addition, there are a number of older and outdated fixtures with T12 lamps and magnetic ballasts. It is recommended to replace all of the T12 fixtures in these areas with higher efficiency fluorescent T8 fixtures with electronic ballasts. This ECM includes retrofit of all older fluorescent fixtures with T8 or T5 fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts in the building. The new, energy efficient T8 fixtures will provide adequate lighting and will save on electrical costs due to better performance of the lamp and ballasts. Energy Savings Calculations: The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building. Energy Savings Summary: ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $47,410 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $2,320 Net Installation Cost ($): $45,090 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $8,780 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $8,780 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 5.1 Simple Lifetime ROI 192.1% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $131,707 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 18% Net Present Value (NPV) $59, October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 13 of 30

15 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker ECM #2: Lighting Upgrade Media Center Description: The Media Center at George Baker Elementary School is currently lit via fluorescent T8 and Metal Halide HID fixtures. The space would be better served with a pulse start lighting system. CE recommends upgrading the 250 watt metal halides to pulse start metal halide fixtures. This measure replaces all the HID, 250 watt HID MH fixtures with 200 watt pulse start metal halide fixtures. Energy Savings Calculations: A detailed Investment Grade Lighting Audit can be found in Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix that outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods. Energy Savings Summary: ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $2,240 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0 Net Installation Cost ($): $2,240 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $247 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $247 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 9.1 Simple Lifetime ROI 65.2% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $3,700 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 7% Net Present Value (NPV) $ October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 14 of 30

16 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker ECM #3: Lighting Upgrade Exterior Lighting Description: The exterior lighting at George Baker Elementary School is currently lit via metal halide shoebox area lights. The exterior would be better served with more efficient LED lighting system. CE recommends upgrading the current lighting to an energy-efficient LED lighting system utilizing Neu-Tech LED lighting fixtures. This measure replaces all the 250 watt metal halide area lights with 73 watt Neu-Tech NU-4293 high output LED lights. Energy Savings Calculations: A detailed Investment Grade Lighting Audit can be found in Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix that outlines the proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods. Energy Savings Summary: ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $2,600 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0 Net Installation Cost ($): $2,600 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $629 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $629 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 4.1 Simple Lifetime ROI 262.9% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $9,435 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 23% Net Present Value (NPV) $4, October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 15 of 30

17 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker ECM #4: Lighting Controls Upgrade Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the George Baker Elementary School are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off. Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways, document posted for public use April The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report: Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings. Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and Media Centers. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations: Energy Savings Savings. Energy Savings % Savings Controlled Light Energy $ kwh kwh Ave Elec Cost October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 16 of 30 kwh/yr

18 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Rebates and Incentives: From the NJ Smart Start Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Smart Start Incentive # Wall mount sensors $20 per sensor # Ceiling mount sensors $35 per sensor Energy Savings Summary: ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $14,900 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,340 Net Installation Cost ($): $13,560 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,841 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,841 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 3.5 Simple Lifetime ROI 324.9% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $57,615 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 28% Net Present Value (NPV) $32, October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 17 of 30

19 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker ECM #5: Replace Split System Units with High Efficiency Units Description: The stage, gymnasium, lounge, offices and nurse corridor are cooled by packaged rooftop units and split systems at George Baker Elementary School. The unit capacities range from 2 tons to 5 tons. Please refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for further information about these units. These units are in average condition though the current units in operation are not high efficiency units. These units are approximately twenty-one years old and have surpassed their ASHRAE service life of fifteen years. These units can be replaced with new higher efficiency units. New packaged rooftop units and split system units provide higher full load and part load efficiencies due to advances in inverter motor technologies, heat exchangers and higher efficiency refrigerants such as R410A which would be used in place of R22 that is currently used in the units. This ECM includes one-for-one replacement of the older packaged and split system units with new higher efficiency systems which include new evaporator coils and refrigerant lines. It is recommended to fully evaluate the capacity needed for all new systems prior to moving forward with this ECM. A summary of the unit replacements for this ECM can be found in the table below: IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY ECM INPUTS SERVICE FOR COOLING TOTAL NUMBER CAPACITY, CAPACITY, OF UNITS BTU/HR TONS REPLACE UNIT WITH SS AC , Carrier 24ANA1 SS AC - 9,10, , Carrier 24ANA1 RTU AC , Carrier 24ANA1 RTU AC , Carrier 24ANA1 Total , The manufacturers used as the basis for the calculation is Trane. The unit pricing and install cost were estimated based on current rates quotes and labor rates. The payback may change based on actual unit pricing and install costs if the ECM is implemented. Energy Savings Calculations: Cooling Energy Savings: Seasonal energy consumption of the air conditioners at the cooling mode is calculated with the equation below: October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 18 of 30

20 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Energy Savings, kwh Cooling Capacity, BTU Hr 1 1 Operation Hours SEER SEER 1000 W kwh Demand Savings, kw Energy Savings kwh Hours of Cooling Cooling Cost Savings Energy Savings, kwh Cost of Electricity $ kwh ECM INPUTS COOLING CAPACITY, BTU/Hr ANNUAL COOLING HOURS ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS EXISTING UNITS SEER SPLIT UNITS SEER # OF UNITS ENERGY SAVINGS kwh DEMAND SAVINGS kw SS 54,000 2, SEER 16 SEER 8 32, SS 24,000 2, SEER 19 SEER 3 6, RTU 42,000 2, SEER 16 SEER 1 3, RTU 36,000 2, SEER 18 SEER 1 3, Total 13 45, Project Cost, Incentives and Maintenance Savings From the NJ Smart Start Program appendix, the rebate are $92 per ton for units below 5.4 tons & $73 per ton for units ranging from 5.4 tons to tons.. Summary of cost, savings and payback for this ECM is below. ECM INPUTS INSTALLED COST COST & SAVINGS SUMMARY # OF UNITS TOTAL COST REBATES NET COST ENERGY SAVING PAY BACK YEARS SS $82,800 8 $82,800 $3,312 $79,488 $5, SS $20,700 3 $20,700 $552 $20,148 $1, RTU $9,200 1 $9,200 $322 $8,878 $ RTU $8,338 1 $8,338 $276 $8,062 $ Total $121, $121,038 $4,462 $116,576 $8, October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 19 of 30

21 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Energy Savings Summary: ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $121,038 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $4,462 Net Installation Cost ($): $116,576 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $8,066 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $8,066 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15 Simple Payback 14.5 Simple Lifetime ROI 3.8% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $120,990 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 0% Net Present Value (NPV) ($20,284.12) October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 20 of 30

22 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker ECM #6: Condensing Boiler Installation Description: The existing boiler plant consists of two cast iron boilers which are used as the primary source of heat for George Baker Elementary School. The existing boilers are approaching their life expectancy of a typical cast iron boiler and could be considered for replacement. With the increased efficiency of the condensing boilers, the savings can be substantial. New condensing boilers could substantially improve the operating efficiency of the heating system of the building. Condensing boiler s peak efficiency tops out at 99% depending on return water temperature. Due to the operating conditions of the building, the annual average operating efficiency of the proposed condensing boiler is expected to be 92%. The existing boiler s efficiency is approximately 75%, which makes the condensing boilers an 17% increase in efficiency. This ECM is based on variable supply water temperature adjusted based on outdoor temperature. This ECM includes installation of two condensing gas fired boilers to replace the existing H.B. Smith Series 28A-8 cast iron boilers. The basis for this ECM is Aerco condensing boiler; model number BMK 2.0. The boiler installation is based on a one for one replacement based on capacity of the existing boiler. Energy Savings Calculations: Existing Heating Natural Gas: 16,664 Therms Bldg Heat Re quired Existing Nat Gas BTU Therm Therms Heating Eff. % Fuel HeatValue Pr oposed Heating Gas Usage Bldg Heating Eff. Heat Re quired BTU BTU % Fuel Heat Value Therm Energy Cost Heating Gas Usage $ Therm Therms Ave Fuel Cost October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 21 of 30

23 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker CONDENSING BOILER CALCULATIONS ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS Existing Cast Iron New Condensing ECM INPUTS Boilers Boilers Existing Nat Gas (Therms) 16,664 0 Boiler Efficiency (%) 75% 92% 17% Nat Gas Heat Value (BTU/Therm) 100, ,000 Equivalent Building Heat Usage (MMBTUs) 1,250 1,250 Gas Cost ($/Therm) ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 16,664 13,585 3,079 Energy Cost ($) $17,497 $14,264 $3,233 COMMENTS: From the NJ Smart Start Appendix, the installation of new condensing boilers warrants the following incentive: $1.00 per MBH. October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 22 of 30

24 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Energy Savings Summary: ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $141,178 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $4,000 Net Installation Cost ($): $137,178 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $3,233 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,233 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 25 Simple Payback 42.4 Simple Lifetime ROI -41.1% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0 Simple Lifetime Savings $80,825 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -4% Net Present Value (NPV) ($80,881.16) October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 23 of 30

25 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker ECM #7: High Efficiency Gas Hot Water Heater Description: The George Baker Elementary School s main domestic supply comes from two Bradford White 4.5 KW electric water heaters. This heater has recently reached its ASHRAE service life of 12 years and should be replaced with a new high efficiency model. This ECM will replace the two electric domestic water heaters with two 98.5% thermal efficient Bradford White ef Series Natural Gas fired 125 MBH and 60 gallons of storage domestic water heaters. Energy Savings Calculations: DOM. HOT WATER HEATER CALCULATIONS ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS Existing Electric Hot High Efficiency ECM INPUTS Water Heaters Heaters Building Type Education Building Square-foot 50,680 50,680 Domestic Water Usage, kbtu 263, , DHW Heating Fuel Type Electric Gas Heating Efficiency 98% 98% 0% Total Usage (kbtu) 268, ,914 0 Electric Cost ($/kwh) $ $ Nat Gas Cost ($/Therm) $ $ ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS Electric Usage (kwh) 78, ,791 Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 0 2,689-2,689 Energy Cost ($) $13,946 $2,824 $11,122 COMMENTS: Savings are based on Energy Information Administration Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey 2003 Information October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 24 of 30

26 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Energy Density for Education type building = 5.2 kbtu / SF / year kbtu yr DHW Heat Usage Energy Density Building Square Footage (SF) SF DHW TotalUsage Heating Eff. Energy Cost Heating Fuel Usage Energy Savings Summary: Dom HW Heat Cons. Btu % Fuel Heat Value FuelUnit BTU FuelUnits Ave Fuel Cost FuelUnit ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $50,000 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $500 Net Installation Cost ($): $49,500 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $11,122 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $11,122 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 12 Simple Payback 4.5 Simple Lifetime ROI 169.6% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $133,464 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 20% Net Present Value (NPV) $61, $ October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 25 of 30

27 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker ECM #8: Install NEMA Premium Efficiency Motors Description: The improved efficiency of the NEMA Premium efficient motors is primarily due to better designs with use of better materials to reduce losses. Surprisingly, the electricity used to power a motor represents 95 % of its total lifetime operating cost. Because many motors operate continuously 24 hours a day, even small increases in efficiency can yield substantial energy and dollar savings. The electric motors driving the hot water pumps are candidates for replacing with premium efficiency motors. These standard efficiency motors run considerable amount of time over a year. This energy conservation measure replaces existing inefficient electric motors with NEMA Premium efficiency motors. NEMA Premium is the most efficient motor designation in the marketplace today. EQMT ID IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY FUNCTION MOTOR HP HOURS OF OPERATION EXISTING EFFICIENCY NEMA PREMIUM EFFICIENCY P-1 Hot Water Pump 7.5 4, % 91.7% P-2 Hot Water Pump 7.5 4, % 91.7% Energy Savings Calculations: Electric usage, kwh HP LF Hours of Operation Motor Efficiency where, HP Motor Nameplate Horsepower Rating LF Load Factor Motor Efficiency Motor Nameplate Efficiency Electric Usage Savings, kwh Electric Usage Electric Existing Usage Proposed Electric Usage Savings, kwh Electric Usage Electric Usage Electric cost savings Electric Usage Savings Electric Rate $ kwh The calculations were carried out and the results are tabulated in the table below: October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 26 of 30

28 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker EQMT ID PREMIUM EFFICIENCY MOTOR CALCULATIONS MOTOR HP LOAD FACTOR EXISTING EFFICIENCY NEMA PREMIUM EFFICIENCY POWER SAVINGS kw ENERGY SAVINGS kwh COST SAVINGS P % 84.0% 91.7% ,068 $265 P % 84.0% 91.7% ,068 $265 TOTAL 1.0 4,137 $529 Equipment Cost and Incentives Below is a summary of SmartStart Building incentives for premium efficiency motors: INCENTIVES NJ SMART HORSE START POWER INCENTIVE 5 $ $90 10 $ $ $ $ $ $180 The following table outlines the summary of motor replacement costs and incentives: EQMT ID MOTOR REPLACEMENT SUMMARY MOTOR POWER HP INSTALLED COST SMART START INCENTIVE NET COST TOTAL SAVINGS SIMPLE PAYBACK P $1,971 $90 $1,881 $ P $1,971 $90 $1,881 $ TOTAL Totals: $3,942 $180 $3,762 $ October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 27 of 30

29 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker Energy Savings Summary: ECM #8 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY Installation Cost ($): $3,942 NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $180 Net Installation Cost ($): $3,762 Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $529 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $529 Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 18 Simple Payback 7.1 Simple Lifetime ROI 153.1% Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0 Simple Lifetime Savings $9,522 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 12% Net Present Value (NPV) $3, October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 28 of 30

30 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker REM #1: kw Solar System Description: The George Baker Elementary School has available roof space that could accommodate a significant amount of solar generation. Based on the available areas a kilowatt solar array could be installed, assuming the existing roof structure is capable of supporting an array. The array will produce approximately 35,196 kilowatt-hours annually that will reduce the overall electric usage of the facility by 8.23%. Energy Savings Calculations: See Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations Appendix for detailed financial summary and proposed solar layout areas. Financial results in table below are based on 100% financing of the system over a fifteen year period. Energy Savings Summary: REM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY System Size (KW DC ): Electric Generation (KWH/Yr): 35,196 Installation Cost ($): $177,007 SREC Revenue ($/Yr): $6,725 Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,230 Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $12,955 ECM Analysis Period (Yr): 15 Simple Payback (Yrs): 13.7 Analysis Period Electric Savings ($): $115,866 Analysis Period SREC Revenue ($): $97,426 Net Present Value (NPV) ($43,147.79) October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 29 of 30

31 Moorestown Township Public Schools George Baker V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less. A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%. B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors. C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output. D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ. E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy. F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode. October 31, 2012 FINAL Page 30 of 30

32 Appendix APPENDIX A

33 APPENDIX A 1 of 1 ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWN CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP Moorestown Public Schools - George Baker Elementary School ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY ECM NO. DESCRIPTION MATERIAL INSTALLATION COST LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES NET INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGS ECM LIFETIME LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS ENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime) LIFETIME MAINTENANCE SAVINGS (Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime) LIFETIME ROI (Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) SIMPLE PAYBACK (Net cost / Yearly Savings) INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR) NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($) ECM #1 Lighting Upgrade - General $17,342 $30,068 $2,320 $45,090 $8,780 $0 $8, $131,707 $ % % $59, ECM #2 Lighting Upgrade - Media Center $1,600 $640 $0 $2,240 $247 $0 $ $3,700 $0 65.2% % $ ECM #3 Lighting Upgrade - Exterior $2,400 $200 $0 $2,600 $629 $0 $ $9,435 $ % % $4, ECM #4 Lighting Controls Upgrade $12,435 $2,465 $1,340 $13,560 $3,841 $0 $3, $57,615 $ % % $32, ECM #5 AC Unit Upgrades $63,538 $57,500 $4,462 $116,576 $8,066 $0 $8, $120,990 $0 3.8% % ($20,284.12) ECM #6 Boiler Upgrade $80,080 $61,098 $4,000 $137,178 $3,233 $0 $3, $80,825 $0-41.1% % ($80,881.16) ECM #7 Domestic Hot Water Heater Upgrades $20,000 $30,000 $500 $49,500 $11,122 $0 $11, $133,464 $ % % $61, ECM #8 NEMA Premium Motor Replacement $3,942 $0 $180 $3,762 $529 $0 $ $9,522 $ % % $3, REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY REM # KW PV System $177,007 $0 $0 $177,007 $6,230 $6,725 $12, $194,327 $100, % % ($22,349.89) Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period. 2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate 3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period.

34 Appendix APPENDIX B

35 Appendix B Page 1 of BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY PHONE: (856) FAX: (856) SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011: Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path) Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm gas or electric Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat (Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH Gas Fired Boilers MBH Gas Heating $300 per unit $1.75 per MBH Gas Fired Boilers MBH $1.00 per MBH Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path) Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE 92%

36 Appendix B Page 2 of 4 Ground Source Heat Pumps $450 per ton, EER 16 Closed Loop $600 per ton, EER 18 $750 per ton, EER 20 Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Cooling Towers 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp Natural Gas Water Heating Gas Water Heaters 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better $50 per unit Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $ $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH $300 per unit Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps $10 per fixture w/electronic Ballast in Existing (1-4 lamps) Facilities Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/electronic Ballast in $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps) Existing Facilities Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL) bulb T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4, 1-4 lamps) Lamp & ballast replacement Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent Metal Halide w/pulse Start Including Parking Lot $7 per bulb $10 per fixture $25 - $30 per fixture $25 per fixture T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture HID 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator (must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system) HID 100w Replacement with new HID 100w $50 per fixture $70 per fixture

37 Appendix B Page 3 of 4 LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw Prescriptive Lighting - LED $20 per fixture $10 per fixture LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture LED Wall-wash Lights LED Recessed Down Lights LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area and Roadway Luminaries LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries $30 per fixture $35 per fixture $175 per fixture $175 per fixture LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries $100 per fixture LED Parking Garage Luminaries LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs. LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $100 per fixture $50 per fixture $150 per fixture $150 per fixture LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture LED Linear Panels (2x2 s only) $100 per fixture LED Fuel Pump Canopy LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium and low temperature display case $100 per fixture $42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

38 Appendix B Page 4 of 4 Lighting Controls Occupancy Sensors Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture Occupancy Controlled hi-low Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled Lighting Controls HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors $40 per electronic communicated motor (replacing shaded pole motors in refrigerator/freezer cases) Other Equipment Incentives $1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more Performance Lighting energy efficient than ASHRAE for New Construction and Complete Renovation Custom Electric and Gas Equipment not prescriptive Incentives $0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year payback on estimated savings. Custom Measures Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

39 Appendix APPENDIX C

40 OMB No STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE 4-Moorestown BOE - George Baker Elementary School Building ID: For 12-month Period Ending: August 31, Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: August 01, 2012 Facility 4-Moorestown BOE - George Baker Elementary School 139 West Maple Avenue Moorestown, NJ Year Built: 1952 Gross Floor Area (ft 2 ): 50,680 Facility Owner Moorestown Township Public Schools 803 North Stanwick Road Moorestown, NJ Primary Contact for this Facility Lynn Shugars 803 North Stanwick Road Moorestown, NJ Energy Performance Rating 2 (1-100) 64 Site Energy Use Summary 3 Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 1,459,851 Natural Gas (kbtu) 4 1,666,375 Total Energy (kbtu) 3,126,226 Energy Intensity 4 Site (kbtu/ft 2 /yr) 62 Source (kbtu/ft 2 /yr) 131 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO 2 e/year) 295 Electric Distribution Utility Public Service Electric & Gas Co National Median Comparison National Median Site EUI 71 National Median Source EUI 150 % Difference from National Median Source EUI -13% Building Type K-12 School Stamp of Certifying Professional Based on the conditions observed at the time of my visit to this building, I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate. Meets Industry Standards 5 for Indoor Environmental Conditions: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A Certifying Professional Michael Fischette 520 South Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA. 2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR. 3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period. 4. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period. 5. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality. The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) and welcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C EPA Form

41 ENERGY STAR Data Checklist for Commercial Buildings In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlying the building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well as its total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager. Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance. NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note. CRITERION Building Name Type Location Single Structure VALUE AS ENTERED IN PORTFOLIO MANAGER 4-Moorestown BOE - George Baker Elementary School K-12 School 139 West Maple Avenue, Moorestown, NJ Single Facility George Baker Elementary School (K-12 School) CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED IN PORTFOLIO MANAGER Gross Floor Area Open Weekends? Number of PCs Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezer units Presence of cooking facilities 50,680 Sq. Ft. No 89 (Default) 0 Yes Percent Cooled 90 % Percent Heated 100 % Months 10(Optional) VERIFICATION QUESTIONS Is this the official building name to be displayed in the ENERGY STAR Registry of Labeled Buildings? Is this an accurate description of the space in question? Is this address accurate and complete? Correct weather normalization requires an accurate zip code. Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPs cannot be submitted for multiple-building campuses (with the exception of a hospital, k-12 school, hotel and senior care facility) nor can they be submitted as representing only a portion of a building. VERIFICATION QUESTIONS Does this square footage include all supporting functions such as kitchens and break rooms used by staff, storage areas, administrative areas, elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Also note that existing atriums should only include the base floor area that it occupies. Interstitial (plenum) space between floors should not be included in the total. Finally gross floor area is not the same as leasable space. Leasable space is a subset of gross floor area. Is this building normally open at all on the weekends? This includes activities beyond the work conducted by maintenance, cleaning, and security personnel. Weekend activity could include any time when the space is used for classes, performances or other school or community activities. If the building is open on the weekend as part of the standard schedule during one or more seasons, the building should select?yes? for open weekends. The?yes? response should apply whether the building is open for one or both of the weekend days. Is this the number of personal computers in the K12 School? Is this the total number of commercial walk-in type freezers and coolers? These units are typically found in storage and receiving areas. Does this school have a dedicated space in which food is prepared and served to students? If the school has space in which food for students is only kept warm and/or served to students, or has only a galley that is used by teachers and staff then the answer is "no". Is this the percentage of the total floor space within the facility that is served by mechanical cooling equipment? Is this the percentage of the total floor space within the facility that is served by mechanical heating equipment? Is this school in operation for at least 8 months of the year? NOTES NOTES Page 1 of 4

42 High School? No Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10, 11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to high school students at all, the user should check 'yes' to 'high school'. For example, if the school teaches to grades K-12 (elementary/middle and high school), the user should check 'yes' to 'high school'. Page 2 of 4

43 ENERGY STAR Data Checklist for Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Power Generation Plant or Distribution Utility: Public Service Electric & Gas Co Fuel Type: Electricity Meter: electric (kwh (thousand Watt-hours)) Space(s): Entire Facility Generation Method: Grid Purchase Start Date End Date Energy Use (kwh (thousand Watt-hours)) 08/01/ /31/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /30/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /30/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /28/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /30/ , /01/ /31/ , /01/ /30/ , electric Consumption (kwh (thousand Watt-hours)) 427, electric Consumption (kbtu (thousand Btu)) 1,459, Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kbtu (thousand Btu)) 1,459, Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including all Electricity meters? Fuel Type: Natural Gas Meter: gas (therms) Space(s): Entire Facility Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms) 08/01/ /31/ /01/ /31/ /01/ /30/ /01/ /31/ /01/ /30/ /01/ /31/2011 2, /01/ /28/2011 4, /01/ /31/2011 3, /01/ /31/2010 3, /01/ /30/2010 1, Page 3 of 4

44 10/01/ /31/ /01/ /30/ gas Consumption (therms) 16, gas Consumption (kbtu (thousand Btu)) 1,666, Total Natural Gas Consumption (kbtu (thousand Btu)) 1,666, Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters? Additional Fuels Do the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building? Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility. On-Site Solar and Wind Energy Do the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located at your facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from this list. All on-site systems must be reported. Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.) Name: Date: Signature: Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR. Page 4 of 4

45 FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA. Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance (SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR. Facility 4-Moorestown BOE - George Baker Elementary School 139 West Maple Avenue Moorestown, NJ Facility Owner Moorestown Township Public Schools 803 North Stanwick Road Moorestown, NJ Primary Contact for this Facility Lynn Shugars 803 North Stanwick Road Moorestown, NJ General Information 4-Moorestown BOE - George Baker Elementary School Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft 2 ) 50,680 Year Built 1952 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: August 31, 2011 Facility Space Use Summary Space Type George Baker Elementary School K-12 School Gross Floor Area (ft2) 50,680 Open Weekends? No Number of PCs d 89 Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezer units 0 Presence of cooking facilities Yes Percent Cooled 90 Percent Heated 100 Months o 10 High School? School District o No moorestown Energy Performance Comparison Evaluation Periods Comparisons Performance Metrics Current (Ending Date 08/31/2011) Baseline (Ending Date 08/31/2011) Rating of 75 Target National Median Energy Performance Rating N/A 50 Energy Intensity Energy Cost Greenhouse Gas Emissions Site (kbtu/ft2) N/A 71 Source (kbtu/ft2) N/A 150 $/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A MtCO 2 e/year N/A 338 kgco 2 e/ft2/year N/A 7 More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Median column presents energy performance data your building would have if your building had a median rating of 50. Notes: o - This attribute is optional. d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

46 Statement of Energy Performance Moorestown BOE - George Baker Elementary School 139 West Maple Avenue Moorestown, NJ Portfolio Manager Building ID: The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using the Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA s) Energy Performance Scale of 1 100, with 1 being the least energy efficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark. This building s score Least Efficient Median Most Efficient This building uses 131 kbtu per square foot per year.* *Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending August 2011 Buildings with a score of 75 or higher may qualify for EPA s ENERGY STAR. I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov Date of certification Date Generated: 08/01/2012

47 Appendix APPENDIX D

48 Appendix D Page 1 of 6 AC Units Tag AC AC - 9,10,15 Unit Type Condensing Unit Condensing Unit Condensing Unit Qty Location Roof Roof Roof Area Served Stage Music/classrooms Lounge/Office Manufacturer Rheem Ruud Rheem Model # RACC-056CAS UAKB-048JAZ RACC-024JAS Serial # 4147 M M M Cooling Type DX, R-22 DX, R-22 DX, R-22 Cooling Capacity (Tons) 4.5 Tons 4 Tons 2 Tons Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER) 9 EER 9 EER 9 EER Heating Type N/A N/A N/A Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A Efficiency N/A N/A N/A Fuel N/A N/A N/A Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life (6) 7 (6) Comments MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST Concord Engineering Group George Baker Elementary School Note: "N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

49 Appendix D Page 2 of 6 AC Units Tag Unit Type Qty Location Area Served Manufacturer Model # Serial # Cooling Type Cooling Capacity (Tons) Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER) Heating Type Heating Input (MBH) Efficiency Fuel Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life Comments AC - 12 Packaged Cooling Rooftop Unit Condensing Unit Condensing Unit Roof Roof Roof Library Office Rooms Across from media center York Rheem Evcon ZJ061C00N2AAA5A RSND-042C AC012M1021CG N1K F WHNM DX, R-410A DX, R-22 DX, R-22 5 Tons 3.5 Tons 1 Ton 12.2 EER 10 SEER 10 SEER N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (6) 3 Note: "N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

50 Appendix D Page 3 of 6 AC Units Tag Unit Type Qty Location Area Served Manufacturer Model # Serial # Cooling Type Cooling Capacity (Tons) Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER) Heating Type Heating Input (MBH) Efficiency Fuel Approx Age ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life Comments AC - 14 Condensing Unit Condensing Unit Condensing Unit Roof Roof Roof Nurse Corridor Cafeteria Classrooms Rheem Ruud Ruud RSND-036C UAKB-060CAZ UAKB-042JAZ 4569-F M M DX, R-22 DX, R-22 DX, R-22 3 Tons 5 Tons 3.5 Tons 10 SEER 9 EER 9 EER N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (6) 7 7 Note: "N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

51 Appendix D Page 4 of 6 MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST Concord Engineering Group George Baker Elementary School Boilers Tag Unit Type Cast Iron Sectional Boiler Qty 2 Location Area Served Manufacturer Boiler Room Hot Water Loop H.B. Smith Model # 28A-8 Serial # N92 99 Input Capacity (Btu/Hr) Rated Output Capacity (Btu/Hr) 2499 MBH 1965 MBH Approx. Efficiency % 75.0% Fuel Natural Gas Approx Age 20 ASHRAE Service Life 35 Remaining Life 15 Comments Note: "N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

52 Appendix D Page 5 of 6 MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST Concord Engineering Group George Baker Elementary School Domestic Water Heaters Tag Unit Type Electric Domestic Hot Water Heater Electric Domestic Hot Water Heater Qty 1 1 Location Boiler Room Kitchen Area Served Hot Water Loop Kitchen Manufacturer Bradford White Bradford White Model # MI80R6DS13 M2120R6DS3 Serial # TH BE Size (Gallons) 80 Gallons 119 Gallons Input Capacity (MBH/KW) 4500 Watts 4500 Watts Recovery (Gal/Hr) - - Efficiency % 98% 98% Fuel Electric Electric Approx Age 13 7 ASHRAE Service Life Remaining Life (1) 5 Comments Note: "N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

53 Appendix D Page 6 of 6 MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST Concord Engineering Group George Baker Elementary School Pumps Tag Unit Type Base Mounted End Suction Qty 2 Location Area Served Manufacturer Boiler Room Hot Water Loop Taco Model # BB Serial # - Horse Power 7.5 HP Flow - Motor Info US Electric Motors Electrical Power /460/3/60 RPM 1740 RPM Motor Efficiency % 84.0% Approx Age 20 ASHRAE Service Life 20 Remaining Life 0 Comments Note: "N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

54 Appendix APPENDIX E

55 CEG Project #: Facility Name: Address: City, State, Zip George C. Baker Elementary School Fixture Reference # Location Average Burn Hours Description Lamps per Fixture Existing Fixtures Watts per Fixture Qty of Fixtures Total kw Usage kwh/yr Work Description Equipment Description Proposed Fixtures Retrofit Lamps per Fixture Watts per Fixture Qty of Fixtures Total kw Usage kwh/yr Retrofit Energy Savings Energy Savings, kwh Energy Savings, kw Energy Control Ref Savings, $ # Controls Description Proposed Lighting Controls Qty of Controls Hour Reduction % Energy Savings, kwh Energy Savings, $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Classroom 3 Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Classroom 5 Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Classroom 7 Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,291 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,431 $ % 572 $ Classroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens ,014 (1) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $64 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom 9 Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom 9 Closet (2) 600 1x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,329 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,989 $ % 468 $ Supply Room 600 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 5 Switch Mnt % 22 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $78 5 Switch Mnt % 104 $ Classroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens (1) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $39 5 Switch Mnt % 78 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $78 5 Switch Mnt % 104 $18 Appendix E - Lighting Audit - George C. Baker Elementary School.xlsx Page 1

56 Fixture Reference # Location Average Burn Hours Classroom Description 1x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens Lamps per Fixture Existing Fixtures Watts per Fixture Qty of Fixtures Total kw Usage kwh/yr Work Description Equipment Description Proposed Fixtures Retrofit (1) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, Lamps per Fixture Watts per Fixture Qty of Fixtures Total kw Usage kwh/yr Retrofit Energy Savings Energy Savings, kwh Energy Savings, kw Energy Control Ref Savings, $ # $26 5 Controls Description Switch Mnt. Proposed Lighting Controls Qty of Controls Hour Reduction % Energy Savings, kwh Energy Savings, $ % 52 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $78 5 Switch Mnt % 104 $ Classroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens (1) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $26 5 Switch Mnt % 52 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $78 5 Switch Mnt % 104 $ Classroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens (1) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $26 5 Switch Mnt % 52 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,443 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, $117 5 Switch Mnt % 156 $ Faculty Restroom (2) x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Electric Room / Custodial Closet 600 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Electric Room / Custodial Closet 600 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,886 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,326 $ % 312 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,886 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,326 $ % 312 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,886 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,326 $ % 312 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,886 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,326 $ % 312 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,886 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,326 $ % 312 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,886 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,326 $ % 312 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,886 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,326 $ % 312 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,886 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,326 $ % 312 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,848 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,768 $ % 416 $ Classroom 31 Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,848 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,768 $ % 416 $ Classroom 33 Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 Appendix E - Lighting Audit - George C. Baker Elementary School.xlsx Page 2

57 Fixture Reference # Location Average Burn Hours Description Lamps per Fixture Existing Fixtures Watts per Fixture Qty of Fixtures Total kw Usage kwh/yr Work Description Equipment Description Proposed Fixtures Retrofit Lamps per Fixture Watts per Fixture Qty of Fixtures Total kw Usage kwh/yr Retrofit Energy Savings Energy Savings, kwh Energy Savings, kw Energy Control Ref Savings, $ # Controls Description Proposed Lighting Controls Qty of Controls Hour Reduction % Energy Savings, kwh Energy Savings, $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,848 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,768 $ % 416 $ Classroom 28 Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,848 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,768 $ % 416 $ Classroom 26 Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Boy's Restroom Boy's Restroom Girl's Restroom Girl's Restroom Storage 600 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens 2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens 2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,772 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,652 $ % 624 $ Classroom ' Channel, 2 Lamp, 85w T12, Mag. Ballast, Pendant ,848 (2) 2x4, 2 Lamp 28w T8, , ,768 $ % 416 $ MPR x4, 4 Lamp, 54w T5HO ,472 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $ % 3,494 $ Stage w A Lamp ,120 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain ,120 $552 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Electrical Room Hall x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens 2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Lounge x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic ,012 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $ % 402 $ Media Center x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/Indirect ,366 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $ % 1,073 $ Media Center Office x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 5 Switch Mnt % 179 $ A/V x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic ,342 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $0 5 Switch Mnt % 268 $ Computer Room x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Direct/Indirect ,472 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $ % 894 $ Boiler Room 600 1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $ % 60 $11 Appendix E - Lighting Audit - George C. Baker Elementary School.xlsx Page 3

58 Fixture Reference # Location Average Burn Hours Boy's Restroom 1200 Description 2x4, 4 Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens Lamps per Fixture Existing Fixtures Watts per Fixture Qty of Fixtures Total kw Usage kwh/yr Work Description Reballast & Relamp Equipment Description Proposed Fixtures Retrofit 4 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit Lamps per Fixture Watts per Fixture Qty of Fixtures Total kw Usage kwh/yr Retrofit Energy Savings Energy Savings, kwh Energy Savings, kw Energy Control Ref Savings, $ # Controls Description Proposed Lighting Controls Qty of Controls Hour Reduction % Energy Savings, kwh $24 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 Energy Savings, $ Girl's Restroom x4, 4 Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 4 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $24 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 652 Custodial Closet 600 "Industrial" Relector, 28w CFL Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Kitchen x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $ % 193 $ Cafeteria x4, 4 Lamp, 54w T5HO ,104 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $ % 2,621 $ Main Office x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic ,248 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $ % 850 $ Principal's Office x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic ,342 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $0 5 Switch Mnt % 268 $ Nurse x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 5 Switch Mnt % 151 $ Main Office Restroom x4, 2-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Wall Mnt., Prismatic Lens Reballast & Relamp 2 Lamp, 28w T8, Elect. Ballast; retrofit $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $ Corridors x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic ,702 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 TOTAL , , ,607 8, ,267 3,764 Appendix E - Lighting Audit - George C. Baker Elementary School.xlsx Page 4

59 CEG Project #: Facility Name: Address: City, State, Zip George C. Baker Elementary School Fixture Reference # Location Average Burn Hours 744 Media Center 2600 Description 250w MH Pendant Mount, Uplight Lamps per Fixture Existing Fixtures Proposed Fixtures Retrofit Retrofit Energy Savings Proposed Lighting Controls Energy Energy Watts per Qty of Total Usage Lamps per Watts per Qty of Total Usage Energy Control Ref Qty of Work Description Equipment Description Savings, Savings, Controls Description Fixture Fixtures kw kwh/yr Fixture Fixture Fixtures kw kwh/yr Savings, $ # Controls kw kwh ,136 Reballast & Relamp Retrofit; 200w MH Pulse Start Lamp and Ballast; Venture Lighting Hour Reduction % Energy Savings, kwh , ,394 $247 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 TOTAL 8 2 6, , , Energy Savings, $ Appendix E - Lighting Audit - George C. Baker Elementary School.xlsx Page 5

60 CEG Project #: Facility Name: Address: City, State, Zip George C. Baker Elementary School Fixture Reference # Location Average Burn Hours Description Lamps per Fixture Existing Fixtures Proposed Fixtures Retrofit Retrofit Energy Savings Proposed Lighting Controls Energy Energy Watts per Qty of Total Usage Lamps per Watts per Qty of Total Usage Energy Control Ref Qty of Work Description Equipment Description Savings, Savings, Controls Description Fixture Fixtures kw kwh/yr Fixture Fixture Fixtures kw kwh/yr Savings, $ # Controls kw kwh Hour Reduction % Energy Savings, kwh Energy Savings, $ 735 Front Entrance w MH Wallpack ,680 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $0 1 Photo Cell % 336 $ Exterior w MH Shoebox Area Light ,720 Relamp Neu-Tech NU-4293-HO , ,552 $629 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 735 Exterior w MH Wallpack ,680 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain , $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 710 Exterior w HPS Wallpack Existing to Remain Existing to Remain $0 1 Photo Cell % 100 $18 TOTAL 9 2 8, , , Appendix E - Lighting Audit - George C. Baker Elementary School.xlsx Page 6

61 Appendix APPENDIX F

62 Appendix F Page 1 of 2 Location Description George C. Baker Elementary School Area (Sq FT) Panel Qty 2700 SHARP NU-U235F2 Panel Sq Ft Panel Total Sq Ft Total KW DC Total Annual kwh Total KW AC Panel Weight (41.9 lbs) W/SQFT , , , Notes:.= Proposed PV Layout 1. Estimated kwh based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.