MRV IN TURKEY: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE CEMENT SECTOR EXPERIENCE

Transcription

1 MRV IN TURKEY: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE CEMENT SECTOR EXPERIENCE COP 23, Bonn/Germany 14 November 2017 Canan DERİNÖZ GENCEL Head of Environment and Climate Change Department Turkish Cement Manufacturers Association

2 TURKISH CEMENT MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION- TCMA Formal representative of the Turkish Cement Producers Founded in 1957 Based in Ankara/Turkey 64 employees (R&D, laboratory analyses, certification and environment) Links sector - government public Local and international relations Issues: production, quality, training and technology Certification Body (environment & product quality) 2

3 TCMA Memberships/Memorandum of Understanding/Partners 1972 European Cement Association European Concrete Paving Association Arab Union for Cement and Building Materials Indian Cement Association China Cement Association European Cement Research Academy 2015 Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) 3

4 4

5 Country-wide Production 5

6 Turkish Cement Sector th Anniversary 80 Million tons/year (Europe 1. World 4.) 72 plants (54 integrated, 18 grinding) tons/year Share of Local Capital %81 Share of Foreign Capital %19 (French, Italian, German, Brazilian and Greek companies) 6

7 Turkish Cement Sector Important Topics Housing Infrastructure Energy Projects Concrete Road & Barriers Energy Efficiency AF/ARM Utilization Iran, Iraq, Syria & S. Arabia Environmental Liabilities Climate Change Technological Investments TCMA has a dedicated department for climate change and environment

8 MRV Scope Energy Fossil Fuels + O 2 Energy+ CO 2 Proces- Calcination Raw Meal (Carbonates) + Energy Oxides + CO 2 Raw Meal + Fuel Clinker Grinding Cement 8

9 MRV Profile of Turkish Cement Sector Total emissions generally > tons CO2 eq/year Category C Highest Tier required 9

10 MRV Profile of Turkish Cement Sector General Preference Standard Calculation Method A- input based Method B- output based Mass Balance Calculation (input and output is clear) Continuous Measurement (Calibrations, Annual Surveillance Tests) 10

11 Aim of MRV in Cement Sector So simple: Determine CO2 from fuels and calcination correctly and precisely Verify your emissions 11

12 Turkey s MRV Pathway and the Cement Sector Regulations in line with EU MRV Legislation (some exceptions, i.e. unreasonable costs) Contributed to drafting legislation of the Turksih Ministry of Environment (MOE) Sector completed duties in the legislation 2012 Monitoring regulation 2014 Revised monitoring regulation 2015 Verifier regulation 2017 Cement sector Submitted monitoring plans Monitoring emissions Verifying emissions reports 2011 Start-up 12

13 Cement Sector Capacity Building- Trainings/Exercise Capacity Building efforts for more than 10 years for the sector specialists Trainings organized by TCMA 2008/2009 CSI methods- sector filled out CSI forms for CO2 budgeting Monitoring Plans 2013-Emissions Calculations Emissions Calculations (EU Experience) 2017-Emissions Calculations/Uncertainty (German Experience) Uncertainty Calculations (Dec, 2017) Trainings organized by GIZ & MOE Monitoring Plans as per the new regulation 2015-Emissions Calculations as per the new regulation 13

14 Capacity Building 14

15 Cement Sector Capacity Building-Pilot Projects GIZ Capacity Building Project 1 Pilot Plant The World Bank Partnership for Market Readiness Project, Turkey- 5 Pilot Plants Sectoral participation to Lessons Learnt Seminars 15

16 Application of the Turkish MRV Regulation EU started MRV with Phase I and Phase II ( )- learning period Members states had flexibility for scope of monitoring plans and reporting in Phase I and Phase II Turkish MRV is adoption of EU Phase III regulation (EU 601/2012 Monitoring and Reporting Regulations) Detailed Covers missing points in Phase I and II Provides harmonization in the EU 16

17 Application of the Turkish MRV Regulation Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization-Great ambition& performance to accomplish the new system continuous dialogue with private sector Capacity Building Projetcs of the MOE (Detailed GIZ supported trainings/guidelines on monitoring plans/ emission reports/verification was very helpful) Transition period of 3 years for using lowest tiers provided room for adaptation to beginners ( ) Monitoring plan software provided harmonization Difficult and time consuming learning by doing period and expected to continue Sector was familiar with CSI methodology but (EU adopted) MRV rules were differentthus need to change emissions reporting methods Text too complicated and detailed for EU legislation beginners Turkish translation of the monitoring plan software should have been in parallel to issue of the regulation (Companies that do not have English speaking staff could not use the MP template on time) Authorization of verifiers and verifier companies were delayed. 17

18 Challenges: Transition Period ends in 2018 By 2018, highest Tiers will be used (Tier 3 and Tier 4) Detailed Uncertainty calculations Revision of measurement devices may be required Tier Maximum uncertainty to report quantity of fuel (t or m3) 1 7,5% 2 5,0 % 3 2,5 % 4 1,5 % 18

19 Challenges: Transition Period ends in 2018 Frequent analyses for process and fuel emissions and waste fuels (fossil and biomass) Higher precision Additional workforce (sampling etc.) and costs Representativeness of the samples Rough estimate for number of analyses required by 2018 Frequency Total Consumption* Number of Analyses Carbonates each tons (CaCO3, MgCO3) 104 million ton analyses/year Solid fuels each ton (for lots containing higher amount, analyses of each lot) 8 million ton analyses/year Waste Fuels 0.6 million ton analyses/year * TCMA Data

20 Challenges and Recommendations Use of Non Accredited Laboratories Legislation requires accredited laboratories for analyses. Laboratories non accredited (e.g. cement plant laboratories) are allowed if accredited labs are; technically not feasible that the non-accredited laboratory meets requirements equivalent to ISO standard for accreditation of analysis laboratories (EN ISO/IEC 17025) Issue of a formal guideline/technical paper on equivalency procedure and conditions for technical unfeasibility will be helpful for the industry 20

21 Challenges and Recommendations Emissions monitoring and reporting is not the job of environmental staff only- it is an integrated job. More accredited laboratories are required Conflict of interest definitions should be more clear Number of experienced verifiers and verifier companies expected to increase in forthcoming years 21

22 Cement sector has been working seriously to fulfill its MRV requirements and support of the Ministry for capacity building has always been very important for the sector 22

23 Thank You Turkish Cement Manufacturers Association