Introduction to DOE s Office of Environmental Management
|
|
- Elinor Hall
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Introduction to DOE s Office of Environmental Management Christine Gelles Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Waste Management Office of Environmental Management 5 June
2 Discussion Topics History and Scope of Environmental Management Program Progress Funding history and current fiscal environment Program goals Details of FY 2014 Budget Request Overview of waste and materials disposition Hot Topics Core Values Wrap Up 2
3 The Fuel Cycle DOE s Manhattan Project History Fabricate uranium fuel Irradiate fuel in reactors for defense purposes Remove spent nuclear fuel from reactor Reprocess spent nuclear fuel Convert and enrich uranium Recovered uranium from spent nuclear fuel Mine uranium ore 3
4 Fabricate uranium fuel Low-level waste Convert and enrich uranium Depleted uranium Low-level waste Irradiate fuel in reactors for defense purposes Mill tailings waste By-Products and Wastes from the Manhattan Project Recovered uranium from spent nuclear fuel Mine uranium ore Low-level waste Remove spent nuclear fuel from reactor Reprocess spent nuclear fuel Highlevel waste Plutonium/ Uranium for weapons fabrication 4
5 EM Site work scope ties directly to Manhattan Project mission Idaho National Lab Hanford, WA Savannah River, SC Fernald, OH Hanford, WA Savannah River, SC Oak Ridge, TN Portsmouth, OH Paducah, KY Fabricate uranium fuel Low-level waste Convert and enrich uranium Depleted uranium Low-level waste Irradiate fuel in reactors for defense purposes Mill tailings waste Idaho National Lab Hanford, WA Savannah River, SC Idaho National Lab Recovered uranium from spent nuclear fuel Mine uranium ore UMTRCA Sites Fernald, OH Moab, UT Low-level waste Remove spent nuclear fuel from reactor Reprocess spent nuclear fuel Highlevel waste Idaho National Lab Hanford, WA Savannah River, SC Plutonium/ Uranium for weapons fabrication Rocky Flats, CO Oak Ridge, TN Pantex, TX Los Alamos, NM Hanford, WA 5
6 EM Mission Complete the safe cleanup of the environmental legacy brought about from five decades of nuclear weapons development, production, and Governmentsponsored nuclear energy research From a legacy of weapons production to the world s largest environmental cleanup program Operating in the world s most complex regulatory environment EM clean-up enables DOE to maintain ongoing operations and other critical missions while achieving compliance with governing environmental laws. 6
7 The EM Cleanup Program: What We Do, How We Do It, and Why EM s mission is to clean up hazardous or potentially hazardous radioactive and other substances, much of which were generated in connection with the early days of the Nation s atomic energy defense activities. EM is building on past successes to complete ambitious remediation projects and treatment facilities. Workers Handling Plutonium with Special Equipment Radioactive Waste Retrieval The Nuclear Legacy Defense Waste Processing Facility Demolition of K-25 Facility Liquid Waste Tanks EM operates one-of-a-kind nuclear facilities to manage high-level radioactive waste and dispose of materials like plutonium. EM cleanup addresses the environmental legacy of America s nuclear weapons research and production complex. 7
8 Safety is EM s Top Priority EM conducts cleanup within a Safety First culture that integrates environmental, safety, and health requirements and controls into all work activities. This ensures protection to the workers, public, and the environment. Worker injury rates for EM cleanup work are significantly lower than averages in comparable industries and have decreased by about one third from FY 2009 to FY EM is further strengthening its organizational safety culture through several programs, including training over 850 senior federal and contractor managers in Leadership for a Safety Conscious Work Environment. 8
9 The Inherently High-Risk Work of Nuclear Cleanup We work with some of the most dangerous substances known to humanity Workers using glovebox to handle plutonium Performing first-of-a-kind tasks in highly hazardous work environments Stabilizing spent (used) nuclear fuel High level waste canisters 9
10 EM is fulfilling real legal obligations Regulatory History DOE created EM to place a focus on bringing its sites into compliance, and entered into a series of site-specific enforceable cleanup agreements that provide the mechanism for bringing those sites into compliance These agreements allow DOE to maintain ongoing operations and the critical missions they support while achieving compliance with governing environmental laws not only in EM but also in NNSA, Science and Nuclear Energy Regulatory Framework EM has approximately 40 compliance agreements across its various sites with Federal and state regulators based primarily on RCRA and CERCLA Stakeholder input is required for most regulatory documents and can significantly impact requirements 10
11 Environmental Cleanup Progress A Snapshot Progress through FY12 FY13 Planned Progress Remaining Remediation Complete (# of release sites) Industrial Facility Completions Radioactive Facility Completions Nuclear Facility Completions Material Access Areas eliminated LLW and M/LLW disposed RH-TRU disposed CH-TRU disposed SNF packaged for final disposition HLW packaged for final disposition Liquid waste tanks closed Liquid waste in inventory eliminated Non-enriched uranium packaged for disposition Pu or uranium residues packaged for disposition Enriched uranium packaged for disposition Pu metal or oxide packaged for long term storage Geographic sites eliminated Life Cycle 10,572 Sites 3,877 Industrial Facilities 987 Radioactive Facilities 476 Nuclear Facilities 35 Material Access Areas 1,567,758 m 3 7,268m 3 150,262m 3 2,450 MTHM 24,183HLW Canisters 239 Liquid Waste Tanks 91,907,000 gallons 736, 801 metric tons 107, 828 kg of bulk 8,198 Containers 5,089 Containers 107 Sites 0% 50% 100% 11
12 EM Has Significantly Reduced Risks to the Environment and Public Completed cleanup on 90 of 107 former nuclear weapons and research sites AK EM Historical Cleanup Sites Sites Remaining in 2012 HI PR Eliminated over 5 million gallons (enough to fill over seven Olympic-sized swimming pools) of radioactive liquid tank waste glass/grout Former plutonium storage vaults Packaged nearly 100% of EM s plutonium and enriched uranium inventories for permanent disposition (over 13,000 containers) 12
13 Historical EM funding (dollars in billions) $8.0 $7.0 $6.0 $6.4 $6.7 $6.9 $7.0 $7.3 $6.6 $6.2 $5.7 $6.0 $6.0 $6.0 $5.7 $5.7 $5.7 $5.5 $5.7 $5.0 $4.0 $3.0 $2.0 $1.0 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY09 ARRA FY10 Approp FY 2011 Oper Plan FY 12 Approp FY 2013 Req. FY 2013 HEWD UE D&D Non-Def Defense $5.8 $6.1 $6.3 $6.1 $6.4 $5.7 $5.3 $5.0 $5.2 $5.1 $5.2 $5.0 $5.0 $5.0 $4.9 $5.1 FY 2013 SEWD 13
14 $ in Millions Budget Reality: EM Appropriations from FY ,200 6,000 5,800 5,600 5,400 5,200 5,000 4, Request 5,655 5,528 5,630 6,047 6,130 5,650 Approp/Op Plan 5,757 5,991 6,006 5,665 5,710 5,290 ARRA 5,988 Delta (382) (420) (360) 14
15 (dollars in millions) EM Funding Levels: FY 2012 FY 2014 ($M) 6,000 5,800 5,600 5,400 5,200 5,000 4,800 4,600 4,400 5,710 5, ,003 5,033 5, ,618 5, ,854 4,200 FY 2012 Enacted FY 2013 Annualized CR Sequestration Uranium Enrichment D&D Fund Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup Defense Environmental Cleanup FY 2014 Total Request 15
16 Achieving Cleanup in a New National Environment After 25 years of cleanup progress, the EM program s budget, technical and regulatory challenges have changed significantly. In response to this changing environment, EM must take the opportunity to strategically refocus our cleanup program, maximizing all of our resources to best serve the American people and our local communities. Key Challenges Facing EM Along with other federal agencies, EM is facing an uncertain fiscal environment. Major technical challenges have emerged, particularly for large construction projects. Deferral of work due to fiscal constraints has significantly increased the program s total cost. Need clear linkages between technology development and deployment and end users. The Path Forward In close consultation with stakeholders, work to optimize existing waste disposal processes and systems. Invest in targeted, applied technology development in areas where cleanup depends on the use of new technologies. Work with regulators and stakeholders to ensure that the regulatory framework for remediating each site is riskinformed, aligned with expected future funding levels and based on realistic scenarios for future site use. 16
17 EM Program Goals Goal 1: Goal 2: Goal 3: Goal 4: Improve safety, security, and quality performance Reduce the life cycle cost and risks of the nuclear legacy cleanup Improve project and contract management Achieve excellence in management and leadership 17
18 Current Dollars (Millions) A Multi-Billion Dollar Gap Exists between EM Planned Costs and Available Funding EM s projected costs generally reflect the cleanup actions required to meet regulatory deadlines and other key cleanup goals. A significant gap exists between EM s projected costs and the available funding expected over the next decade $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 TARGETRANGE Compliance baselines were built assuming higher funding targets than EM is currently receiving. Anticipated funding levels may be below requirements level at many EM sites. Gap between projected cost and target is approximately $14 to $29 billion assuming availability of target as sites close. Projected Cost to Go: $174 - $209B $0 18
19 Thousands EM is developing advanced analytical tools to inform planning and budget. Thousands Analysis of last year s hypothetical flat funding cases showed the impact of flat funding: 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Funded ongoing operations such as SRS liquid waste, INL TRU, WIPP Prioritized mortgage reduction projects like River Corridor, PFP, ETTP, INL to free up outyear target Deferred SRS tank closure New ORP tank farm projects until RL transferred target in FY16-18 Assumed Paducah GDP transfer costs would come from additional appropriations Compliance Case 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 River Protection ORP-1 Richland RL-1 Savannah River SRS-1 Idaho ID-1 Oak Ridge OR-1 Paducah PAD-1 Portsmouth PORT-1 WIPP WIPP-1 Moab Moab-1 WVDP WV-1 Brookhaven BNL-1 ETEC ETEC-1 SLAC SLAC-1 SPRU SPRU-1 Los Alamos LANL-1 Livermore LLNL-1 Nevada NV-1 Sandia SN-1 HQ Total HQ $5.7 Target $5.7 Flat Case River Protection ORP-2 Richland RL-2 Savannah River SRS-2 Idaho ID-4 Oak Ridge OR-3 Paducah PAD-2 Portsmouth PORT-2 WIPP WIPP-2 Moab Moab-2 WVDP WV-2 Brookhaven BNL-1 ETEC ETEC-1 SLAC SLAC-1 SPRU SPRU-1 Los Alamos LANL-1 Livermore LLNL-1 Nevada NV-1 Sandia SN-1 HQ Total HQ $5.7 Target 19
20 EM Program Priorities Balancing priorities within the complex Maintain a safe, secure, and compliant posture in the EM complex Radioactive Tank Waste Special Nuclear Materials and Used Nuclear Fuel Transuranic & Solid Waste Facilities D&D Essential Site Services 20
21 EM s FY 2014 Budget Request: Funding by Site Los Alamos National Laboratory $220M Program Direction $281M Paducah $322M Idaho $370M Portsmouth $152M Carlsbad $208M Oak Ridge $413M West Valley Demonstration Project $66M Nevada Other $62M $56M Moab $36M SPRU $24M Richland $993M River Protection $1,210M Total Request $5.622B Savannah River $1,209M 21
22 Where Does Each Dollar of Funding Go? Funding by EM Mission Area in FY 2014 Radioactive Tank Waste $ 1,933M / 34% Special Nuclear Materials and Used Nuclear Fuel** $ 906M / 16% Soil and Groundwater $ 492M / 9% EM s FY 2014 Budget Request - $5.622 Billion Total *Includes Program Direction, Program Support, TDD, Post Closure Administration and Community and Regulatory Support **Includes Safeguards and Security Percentages do not add to 100% due to rounding Facility D&D $ 1,095M / 19% Transuranic & Solid Waste $ 804M / 14% Essential Site Services* $ 392M / 7% 22
23 EM s FY 2014 Budget Request: Funding by State CA $11M WA $2.3B NV $65M ID $377M UT $36M NM Sites Remaining in 2012 $444M Total FY14 Request $5.622B OH $188M KY $332M TN $427M SC $1.3B NY $90M 23
24 Technology Development in FY 14 and Beyond FY 2014 Funding: $24M Maximizing waste loading in glass Groundwater modeling Mercury remediation Separations technologies 24
25 EM is an integrated, national program. No single site, project or programmatic activity can be considered in a vacuum. All strategic plans, regulatory decisions, waste disposition decision, policy change and budget request (etc!) are developed within the balanced, risk informed program which prioritizes safety above all else and targets continued compliance, progress, fiscal responsibility and continuous improvement. 25
26 Major DOE Radioactive Waste Transfers Waste exports from DOE Generator Sites are shown in the incoming shipment boxes for the treatment and disposal facilities. This map is not inclusive of all past or planned shipments. MLLW/LLW from ANL-E, BNL, Fermi, Hanford, INL, Naval Reactor Sites, Paducah, Portsmouth, PPPL, RF, SLAC, and SR for disposal [Naval Reactor sites are located in several states and are not shown on map] TRU from Columbus for processing/storage SNF and HLW to Yucca Mtn for disposal SNF to INL for storage TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW to PEcoS, Permafix, and OR for treatment SNF to INL and SR for storage, treatment, or repackaging TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW/LLW to Envirocare and NTS, for disposal MLLW from Hanford, INL, and RF for treatment SNF from Hanford, OR, and WV, and D/FRR for storage, treatment, or repackaging M/LLW from INL for disposal Stanford Linear Accelerator Lab (SLAC) Lawrence Livermore National Lab (LLNL) HLW and SNF from Hanford, INL, SR, and WV, and D/FRR for disposal Hanford Pacific EcoSolutions (PEcoS) Yucca Mtn (proposed) Envirocare Nevada Test Site (NTS) HLW, SNF, and D/FRR to Yucca Mtn for disposal TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW/LLW to Envirocare, Hanford, and NTS for disposal MLLW to PEcoS, Permafix, and OR for treatment Idaho National Lab (INL) Rocky Flats (RF) Los Alamos National Lab (LANL) Fermi National Accelerator Lab Argonne National Lab-East (ANL-E) Paducah Oak Ridge (OR) Mound Fernald Permafix MLLW from Fernald, Hanford, INL, LLNL, NTS, OR, Paducah, Portsmouth, RF, and SR for treatment MLLW/LLW from OR for disposal West Valley (WV) Columbus Portsmouth Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) Princeton Plasma Physics Lab (PPPL) MLLW from Hanford, INL, LLNL, RF, and SR for treatment MLLW to OR for treatment TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW/LLW from ANL-E, Fernald, INL, LANL, LLNL, Mound, NTS, Paducah, Portsmouth, PPPL, OR, RF, SR, and WV for disposal Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) MLLW/LLW from ANL-E, BNL, Columbus, Fermi, Fernald, INL, LANL, LLNL, Mound, Paducah, Portsmouth, OR, RF, SLAC, SR, and WV for treatment and/or disposal Waste Control Specialists MLLW from RF for treatment TRU from ANL-E. BNL, Hanford, INL, LANL, LLNL, NTS, OR, RF, SR, and WV for disposal Savannah River (SR) Permafix MLLW from INL and RF treatment For Illustrative Purposes Only Dated Information SNF from OR and D/FRR for storage, treatment, or repackaging TRU from Mound for processing/storage LLW from SR and Naval Reactors for disposal HLW and SNF to Yucca Mtn for disposal TRU to WIPP for disposal MLLW/LLW to Envirocare, Hanford, and NTS for disposal MLLW to OR for treatment Low-Level Waste (LLW) Mixed Low-Level Waste (MLLW) High-Level Waste (HLW) Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Domestic/Foreign Research Reactor Fuel (D/FRR) Transuranic Waste (TRU) DOE Generator Site (no on-site disposal facility) DOE On-site Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility DOE Off-site Waste Treatment Facility EXHIBIT B DOE Off-site Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (NTS and Hanford are also generator sites and dispose of some waste on-site) Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (Note: Envirocare also treats waste) Commercial Radioactive Waste Treatment Facility Incoming Waste Shipment Outgoing Waste Shipment
27 Network of Major DOE Radioactive Waste Transfers Shipment lines do not portray actual transportation routes. This map is not inclusive of all past or planned shipments. From Naval Reactor sites located in several states Hanford Pacific EcoSolutions To Hanford To Permafix To Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Idaho National Lab To Oak Ridge Treatment West Valley Brookhaven Stanford Linear Accelerator Lawrence Livermore Yucca Mtn (proposed) Nevada Test Site Envirocare Rocky Flats To Envirocare Fermi Argonne Mound Fernald Columbus Portsmouth Princeton To Oak Ridge Treatment Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Los Alamos Waste Control Specialists Paducah Oak Ridge Permafix Savannah River To Nevada Test Site To Nevada Test Site Permafix To Yucca Mtn For Illustrative Purposes Only Dated Information From Naval Reactor sites located in several states Transuranic Waste Disposal Shipment Transuranic Waste Processing/Storage Shipment DOE Generator Site (no on-site disposal facility) DOE Onsite Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility Spent Nuclear Fuel/High-Level Waste Disposal Shipment Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage, Treatment, or Repackaging Shipment DOE Offsite Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (NTS and Hanford are also generator sites and dispose of some waste onsite) DOE Offsite Radioactive Waste Treatment Facility Low-Level Waste/Mixed Low-Level Waste Disposal Shipment Low-Level Waste/Mixed Low-Level Waste Treatment Shipment Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (Note: Envirocare also treats waste) Commercial Radioactive Waste Treatment Facility
28 High level waste (HLW) management Hanford 176M curies; 55M gallons 177 Tanks; ~ 9,700 canisters (projected) Idaho 37M curies, 900K gallons 15 tanks (11 closed); ~3,590-5,090 canisters (projected) West Valley Demonstration Project (owned by NY) ~ 25M curies in 275 canisters; 4 tanks (emptied) Savannah River Site 292M curies; 37M gallons 51 Tanks (4 closed) ~3,600 canisters (2013); ~7,580 (total projected) 28
29 Spent nuclear fuel management Hanford ~ 2130 mthm Idaho ~280 mthm Fort St. Vrain, CO ~15 mthm Savannah River Site ~30 mthm 29
30 Transuranic (TRU) waste disposition Hanford Site Idaho National Laboratory Materials Fuels Complex Argonne National Laboratory - East NRD, LLC West Valley Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratory Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Oak Ridge National Laboratory KAPL Nuclear Fuel Services Babcock & Wilcox NES Savannah River Site 30
31 WIPP Disposal Operations 31
32 The WIPP Transportation System: Safest shipping containers on the road Nuclear Regulatory Commission certified TRUPACT-II RH-72B The [WIPP transportation] system is safer than that employed for any other hazardous material in the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, WIPP Panel CNS10-160B TRUPACT-III HalfPACT 32
33 National TRU Waste Program Status Safe TRU waste disposal for 14 years (March 1999) More than 11,000 shipments received at WIPP More than 13.5 million safe loaded miles traveled 22 sites cleaned up of legacy TRU waste More than 86,000 cubic meters of waste disposed FY14 Budget to maintain a capability of certifying, shipping, and receiving up to 17 shipments/week WIPP operational plans may be modified to support disposition of unique TRU streams
34 TRU Waste Shipping Routes
35 TRU Shipments Summary Shipments received at WIPP as of April 29, 2013: 11,244 Contact-handled: 10,594 Remote-handled: ,144 1, ,032 1,194 1, CH TRU waste shipments only Total Shipments Received by Calendar Year (Including intersite shipments) CH and RH TRU waste shipments 35
36 PE-Ci per cubic meter emplaced Plutonium Equivalent curies (PE-Ci) per cubic meter by calendar year Higher in 2011 and 2012 than in recent years to date What this trend shows is we are more efficiently disposing of greater curies and, therefore, reducing risks sooner. As of
37 WIPP: Repository Status
38 Low Level/Mixed Low Level Waste Disposition Energy Solutions Hanford Site Idaho National Laboratory Fernald Crescent Junction Nevada Test Site Legend CERCLA Disposal Facility LLW Operations Disposal Facility MLLW Operations Disposal Facility Waste Control Specialists Oak Ridge National Laboratory Savannah River Site Regional LLW/MLLW Facility Commercial LLW/MLLW Operations Disposal Facility Los Alamos National Laboratory Closed CERCLA Facility Byproduct Material Disposal 38
39 (millions of cubic feet) Complex-wide LLW/MLLW Disposal Forecasts -- Continued Downward Trend OnSite Commercial NNSS TBD FY11 Actual FY12 Actual FY13 FY14 FY15 Forecasts from DRAFT 2011 WIMS 39
40 LLW/MLLW Disposition Options EnergySolutions (Utah) Accept Class A LLW and MLLW; 11e(2); NORM FY12 LLW/MLLW Disposal 2% 1% Offers rail access, onsite treatment, and favorable bulk waste handling and disposal Waste Control Specialists LLC (Andrews County, Texas) Multiple disposal facilities/licenses NNSS Commercial Onsite Hazardous/exempt; 11e(2); NORM Texas Compact Class A, B and C LLW non-doe waste 97% Federal Waste Facility Class A, B, and C LLW/MLLW DOE waste 40
41 Current Hot Topics in EM o o o o o o o o o Construction of the Waste Treatment Plant at ORP Construction of Salt Waste Processing Facility at Savannah River Treatment of Sodium Bearing Wastes in Idaho Suspected leaking tanks at ORP Surplus plutonium disposition Impact of delays in availability of a HLW repository on EM inventories Spent nuclear fuel processing? Mission of WIPP Construction of new on-site disposal facilities o o o o Challenging waste stream disposition o Depleted uranium o Uranium 233 o Wastes incidental to reprocessing Scrap metals and contaminated nickel disposition Greater Than Class C LLW Disposal Environmental Impact Statement Mercury Storage Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement o Revision to DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management o Risk Informed Decision Making 41
42 Risk-informed Decision Making Manage environmental contamination and waste in a manner that optimizes, balances protection of human health and the environment and cost effectiveness for current and future generations Will be necessary to leave residual waste in place Allows for natural attenuation Integrates stewardship into holistic, life-cycle management options Requires further development of predictive modeling and visualization, and monitoring and sensor technologies Recognizes U.S. Government s long term commitment to monitoring and other institutional controls Savannah River Tank 5 Heel Removal (Tank Interior) Natural attenuation of uranium contamination 300 area, Hanford Site 42
43 Core Value: Community Involvement EM s success hinges on its collaboration with affected state, local, tribal governments, and local citizen groups. EM supports national intergovernmental organizations and citizen groups through grants and cooperative agreements. Bases for EM processes include: Early public and tribal involvement Communication Coordination among multiple regulators Transparency and confidence in risk ranking methodology Enhance involvement in EM and regulatory decisions 43
44 Core Value: Lessons Learned & Continuous Improvement o Based on successes at Rocky Flats, Fernald, Mound, and other DOE sites, EM has developed Lessons Learned. These lessons are continuing to be applied to ongoing EM cleanup effort. o Over the years, EM program has solved many cleanup problems that one time seemed unsolvable. Lessons Learned from these and other EM efforts can be used to address decommissioning and remediation issues all over the world. o EM lessons learned can be accessed at ohttp://rockyflats.apps.em.doe.gov/ TMI Fuel Storage Facility at Idaho Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor after the disaster Fukushima Reactors damage due to 2011 tsunami 44
45 The World is Watching: EM International Efforts Canada Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL) United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) Sellafield SOI between UK NDA and DOE for Exchange of Information Concerning Management of Radioactive Waste UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE-ONR) Russia SOI between Rosatom and DOE concerning collaboration in innovative technologies for environmental restoration and radioactive waste management Khlopin Radium Institute (KRI) SIA Radon Institute Nuclear Safety Institute Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University (ETU) LETI AtomEco Conference Argentina US-Argentina Joint Standing Committee Meetings on Nuclear Energy Cooperation (JSCNEC) France DOE-CEA Agreement for Cooperation in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies AREVA MOU between ANDRA and DOE concerning cooperation in the field of radioactive waste management ICEM Conference 2011 International Multilateral Organizations International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development / Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA) International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation (IFNEC) International Decommissioning Network (IDN) Sweden SKB, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company Ukraine International Radioecolog y Laboratory (IRL) Hungary MOU with Public Limited Co. for Radioactive Waste Management (PURAM) Taiwan American Institute in Taiwan - Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States (AIT TECRO) State Department led meeting China China Academy of Sciences Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Technology (PUNT) Migration Conference 2011 Japan US-Japan Nuclear Energy Action Plan (JNEAP) U.S.-Japan Science Mission Fukushima workshops Bilateral Commission on Civil Nuclear Energy Cooperation South Korea Nuclear Engineering and Technology Institute (NETEC) US-Korea Joint Standing Committee Meetings on Nuclear Energy Cooperation (JSCNEC) US-Korea Energy Dialogue meeting 45
46 Closing Messages EM reduces risks and protect our workers, our communities and the environment through our continued cleanup. We have demonstrated value for the American Taxpayer by delivering significant progress in the past several years in reducing risks and the overall liability - but our work is not done. Our work is urgent and essential to the health and economic vitality of our communities and the nation and positions our Sites for future missions Our mission is not discretionary - it is a congressional mandate to D&D uranium enrichment facilities and a federal obligation to address the cold war environmental legacy cleanup and honor our regulatory commitments. Time is not on our side costs and risks increase over time. EM s continued success is dependent upon an integrated, risk informed national program, which can only be sustained by support of regulators and stakeholders. 46
Update on the. Federal Facilities Task Force/ May 28, Assistant Secretary
Update on the Office of Environmental Management Federal Facilities Task Force/ State t and Tribal Governments Working Group May 28, 2009 Dr. Inés R. Triay Assistant Secretary Office of Environmental Management
More informationIMPROVING BUSINESS PRACTICES TO INTEGRATE DOE TRANSPORTATION OF LOW-LEVEL AND LOW-LEVEL MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTE
IMPROVING BUSINESS PRACTICES TO INTEGRATE DOE TRANSPORTATION OF LOW-LEVEL AND LOW-LEVEL MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTE Grace Plummer Donette Cappello Contract Reform and Privatization Project Office, DOE Judith
More informationJane Hedges, Manager, Nuclear Waste Program Washington Department of Ecology
Jane Hedges, Manager, Nuclear Waste Program Washington Department of Ecology National Conference of State Legislatures June 20, 2012 586-square-mile site 2,400 waste management units/areas of concern ~72
More informationLos Alamos National Laboratory Waste Management Program
ABSTRACT Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Management Program G. M. Lopez-Escobedo, K. M. Hargis, C. R. Douglass Los Alamos National Laboratory PO Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA Los Alamos National
More informationRIVER PROTECTION PROJECT WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONCEPT AND APPROACH. M. J. Lawrence, British Nuclear Fuels Ltd., Inc.
RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONCEPT AND APPROACH M. J. Lawrence, British Nuclear Fuels Ltd., Inc. ABSTRACT The River Protection Project Waste Treatment Plant (RPP-WTP) is a privatized
More informationNON-REACTOR ALTERNATIVES FOR PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION
NON-REACTOR ALTERNATIVES FOR PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION Edwin S. Lyman Senior Scientist Union of Concerned Scientists Presentation at the AAAS Washington, DC June 10, 2014 SPENT FUEL STANDARD Spent fuel standard
More informationDeclassification of Today's Highly Enriched Uranium Inventories at Department of Energy Laboratories
FAQs Site Map Contact Us SEARCH OPENNET DATABASE GO HOME OPENNESS POLICY OPENNESS INFORMATION RESOURCES HOW TO ORDER OPENNESS DOCUMENTS LOGIN FOR DATA SUBMISSION Advanced Search Scope Office of Classification
More informationPAGE 2 OF 11. History. Savannah River Site Focus. Ongoing Missions
Savannah River Site 198,344 acres, or 310 square miles DOE: Savannah River Operations Office NNSA: Savannah River Site Office Office of Site Engineering and Construction Management U.S. Forest Service
More informationCurrent Status of Nuclear Waste Management (and Disposal) in the United States
Current Status of Nuclear Waste Management (and Disposal) in the United States K. McMahon* a, P. Swift a, M. Nutt b, J. Birkholzer c, W. Boyle d, T. Gunter d, N. Larson d, R. MacKinnon a, and K. Sorenson
More informationThe Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Results* and Personal Observations Charles W. Forsberg Executive Director MIT Nuclear Fuel Cycle Study Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering cforsber@mit.edu
More informationTRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Printed in the United States of America
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
More informationPresented By Quarterly Public Meeting August 22, 2012
West Valley Phase 1 Studies Update Presented By Quarterly Public Meeting August 22, 2012 Agenda Status of Erosion PAS You will hear from SMEs directly in next presentation. Status of Engineered Barriers
More informationHANFORD TANK WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM. T. Z. Smith, S. A. Wiegman U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection
HANFORD TANK WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM T. Z. Smith, S. A. Wiegman U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection ABSTRACT J. O. Honeyman CH2MHILL Hanford Group, Inc. The US Department of Energy is
More informationWM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Treatability Variance for Containerized Liquids in Mixed Debris Waste 12101
Treatability Variance for Containerized Liquids in Mixed Debris Waste 12101 Catherine M. Alstatt Transuranic Waste Processing Center, Lenoir City, TN 37771 Wastren Advantage Inc. ABSTRACT The TRU Waste
More informationffl highly toxic to people ffl explode or ignite in air ffl extremely corrosive ffl unstable (c) CERCLA Superfund liabity 2
HAZARDOUS WASTE 1. WASTE: Its a growing crises!! *We (US) generate an avg. of 4 lbs of "garbage" each day! *every 5 yrs =volume of Statue of Liberty! *4 Billion tons per yr. 2. History (a) Dilute and disperse
More informationRadioactive Waste Management (Joint with the Agriculture & Energy Committee)
COMMITTEE: POLICY: TYPE OF POLICY: Environment Committee Radioactive Waste Management (Joint with the Agriculture & Energy Committee) Consent Low-Level Waste Congress mandated that the states assume total
More informationTransportation of Radioactive Materials
Transportation of Radioactive Materials CRESP Short Course August 2009 Mark Abkowitz Department of Civil & Env Eng Vanderbilt University mark.abkowitz@vanderbilt.edu Types of Radioactive Shipments Uranium
More informationHANFORD SITE WASTE TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL INTEGRATION. Kent M. McDonald Waste Management Federal Services of Hanford, Inc. Richland, Washington
HANFORD SITE WASTE TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL INTEGRATION Kent M. McDonald Waste Management Federal Services of Hanford, Inc. Richland, Washington ABSTRACT In 1998 Waste Management Federal Services of
More informationOverview of Spent Fuel Management Programs
Overview of Spent Fuel Management Programs Presented to: INMM 32nd Spent Fuel Management Seminar Presented By: Nigel Mote, Executive Director January 12, 2017 Washington, DC 1 About the Board The U.S.
More informationProgress on Footprint Reduction at the Hanford Site
Progress on Footprint Reduction at the Hanford Site - 12406 Dale E. McKenney*, Paul Seeley** and Al Farabee*** *CH2M HILL, Plateau Remediation Company, Richland, Washington 99352 **Cenibark International,
More informationPublic Involvement. Portsmouth Public Update Meeting March 18, 2008
Portsmouth Public Update Meeting March 18, 2008 Environmental Cleanup Update Preparations for Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Public Involvement Agenda Topics
More informationWM 06 Conference, February 26 March 2, 2006, Tucson, AZ
The Deactivation, Decontamination and Decommissioning of the Plutonium Finishing Plant, a Former Plutonium Processing Facility at DOE s Hanford Site S. Charboneau U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations
More informationINTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION, USACE STYLE
INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION, USACE STYLE Author Kenneth M. Grumski MHF Logistical Solutions 129 McCarrell Lane Zelienople, Pennsylvania 16063 Co-author Peter W. Coutts The IT Group 175 East Park Drive, Building
More informationWM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Applying Lean Concepts to Waste Site Closure 13137
ABSTRACT Applying Lean Concepts to Waste Site Closure 13137 M. L. Proctor Washington Closure Hanford, 2620 Fermi, Richland, Washington 99354, mlprocto@wch-rcc.com Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) was selected
More informationSustainable Nuclear Fuel Cycles Dr. Pete Lyons Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
Sustainable Nuclear Fuel Cycles Dr. Pete Lyons Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy Georgia Institute of Technology 50 th Anniversary Celebration Founding of the School of Nuclear
More informationDOE s NEW MARKET THRUST: RESTRICTED REUSE PRODUCTS
DOE s NEW MARKET THRUST: RESTRICTED REUSE PRODUCTS Michael Gresalfi, Ph.D., Washington, D.C. Coordinator, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and John Neave, Reuse and Recycle Coordinator, Office of Environmental
More informationA Brief History of the Yucca Mountain Project
DOE-FIU SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM STUDENT SUMMER INTERNSHIP TECHNICAL REPORT June 1, 2010 to August 7, 2010 A Brief History of the Yucca Mountain Project Principal Investigators:
More informationSAVANNAH RIVER SITE CANYON UTILIZATION
DNFSB/TECH-32 SAVANNAH RIVER SITE CANYON UTILIZATION Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Technical Report March 2002 SAVANNAH RIVER SITE CANYON UTILIZATION This report was prepared for the Defense
More informationCommercial Nuclear Fuel Leasing The Relationships to Nonproliferation and Repository Site Performance
Commercial Nuclear Fuel Leasing The Relationships to Nonproliferation and Repository Site Performance D.L. Pentz The Pentz Consulting Company, Inc. 4062 S. Beach Dr., Freeland, WA 98249 USA R.H. Stoll
More informationNuclear Waste Policy: A New Start? Part I: Nuclear Waste 101
Nuclear Waste Policy: A New Start? Part I: Nuclear Waste 101 Eric Loewen, Ph.D. President American Nuclear Society 2011 Charlotte Engineering Conference November 9, 2011 Charlotte, NC Return to the Jungle
More informationCollection and safekeeping of TRIGA Spent Nuclear Fuel
Collection and safekeeping of TRIGA Spent Nuclear Fuel Presented by Ken Whitham, US DOE-ID and Jim Floerke, CH2MWG Idaho 2013 Spent Nuclear Fuel at the Idaho Cleanup Project 2 Atoms for Peace Since the
More informationCleanup at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Challenges
Cleanup at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Challenges - 9493 Susan G. Stiger, Ken Hargis, Michael Graham Los Alamos National Laboratory P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545 George Rael U.S. Department
More informationReport to Congress: Disposition of Surplus Defense Plutonium at Savannah River Site
Report to Congress: Disposition of Surplus Defense Plutonium at Savannah River Site February 15, 2002 National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Fissile Materials Disposition 02/15/02 Table of
More informationTRU WASTE MANAGEMENT PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE AT OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY. K. M. Billingsley K. P. Guay J. R. Trabalka G. L.
TRU WASTE MANAGEMENT PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE AT OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY K. M. Billingsley K. P. Guay J. R. Trabalka G. L. Riner Advanced Integrated Bechtel Jacobs U.T. Battelle, LLC U.S. Department
More informationAdvanced Fuel Cycles?
Advanced Fuel Cycles? Paul Murray Paul.Murray@areva.com Atlanta November 2012 Anything is Possible. Is it Pratical? Used Nuclear Fuel US reactors currently discharge > 2,000 tunf/y with a total inventory
More informationINTEI~OFFICE MEMORANDUM
WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY INTEI~OFFICE MEMORANDUM July 19, 2004 TO: Distribution FROM: W. G. Dyer W~~~ RE: Characterization of H-Canyon Wastes When Processing Unirradiated Materials WSRC- TR-2004-00328,
More information1.JAEA s Strategy for the International Cooperation (Overview)
Basic policy 1.JAEA s Strategy for the International Cooperation (Overview) reference Significance of international cooperation Efficient promotion of R&D and maximization of the results using resources
More informationAmec Foster Wheeler Connected excellence in all we do. Invest Japan Paul Fleming Campaign Director, Asia
Amec Foster Wheeler Connected excellence in all we do Invest Japan 2015 Paul Fleming Campaign Director, Asia October 2015 Presentation Topics Brief introduction to Amec Foster Wheeler What attracted us
More informationCRITICAL DECISION-2/3. (Approve Performance Baseline and Project Execution) For. EM Corporate Project: Revision 0
CRITICAL DECISION-2/3 (Approve Performance Baseline and Project Execution) For EM Corporate Project: Revision 0 Submitted by: EM Corporate Project Manager Date: CRITICAL DECISION-2 and 3 (CD-2/3) PACKAGE
More informationHANFORD SITE MIXED WASTE DISPOSAL
HANFORD SITE MIXED WASTE DISPOSAL Kent M. McDonald and Dale E. McKenney Fluor Hanford Waste Management Project Todd A. Shrader, US Department of Energy Richland, Washington ABSTRACT Significant volumes
More informationGoing Underground: Safe Disposal of Nuclear Waste
Going Underground: Safe Disposal of Nuclear Waste Burton Richter Pigott Professor in the Physical Sciences, Emeritus Stanford Energy Seminar January 23, 2012 Nuclear Energy Issues It is too expensive It
More informationOhio Sierra Club Nuclear Free Committee. January 28, 2017 Pat Marida, chair
Ohio Sierra Club Nuclear Free Committee January 28, 2017 Pat Marida, chair Davis-Besse The Reactor with the Hole in the Head IGNORED When a delayed inspection was done in 2002, this is what they found.
More informationMANAGING RADIOACTIVE WASTE - THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY S LAST BASTION OF SELF-REGULATORY AUTHORITY UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT - WHERE ARE WE?
MANAGING RADIOACTIVE WASTE - THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY S LAST BASTION OF SELF-REGULATORY AUTHORITY UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT - WHERE ARE WE? Martin Letourneau US Department of Energy Brenda Flory Girod
More informationMANAGING THE NUCLEAR LEGACY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: STRATEGIES AND PROGRESS IN THE FORMATION OF A LIABILITIES MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
MANAGING THE NUCLEAR LEGACY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: STRATEGIES AND PROGRESS IN THE FORMATION OF A LIABILITIES MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY Alan Edwards, Dr. Bernie L. Meyers Liabilities Management Unit Department
More informationLONG-TERM ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP (LTES) PLANNING AND IMPLEMENATATON
LONG-TERM ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP (LTES) PLANNING AND IMPLEMENATATON J. Estrada, K. Agogino U.S. Department of Energy Sandia Site Office PO Box 5400, Albuquerque, NM 87185-5400 ABSTRACT The Department
More informationWorld Energy Use by Source
US Electricity Production By Source Coal Gas Nuclear Hydro Oil Other 53% 16% 21% 7% 2% 1% World Energy Use by Source In The United States there are 110 commercial reactors in 32 states. Six states rely
More informationLessons Learned from ARRA Work at Oak Ridge
Lessons Learned from ARRA Work at Oak Ridge Ken Schneider Program Manager Environmental Management Program Office Oak Ridge National Laboratory March 2, 2011 Three Different Sites All Supporting DOE s
More informationWashington Closure Hanford: Cleaning up the River Corridor
Washington Closure Hanford: Cleaning up the River Corridor Closure Project River Corridor Jeff Bradford Deputy Project Manager March 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Protecting
More informationOverview of Hanford Site Risk Assessment to Support Cleanup Decision Making
Overview of Hanford Site Risk Assessment to Support Cleanup Decision Making Mark Triplett Senior Advisor Risk and Decision Sciences 1 st International Forum on the Decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi
More informationCASE STUDY: RH-TRU WASTE TRANSPORTATION FROM BATTELLE COLUMBUS LABORATORIES. James H. Eide Battelle Columbus Laboratories
CASE STUDY: RH-TRU WASTE TRANSPORTATION FROM BATTELLE COLUMBUS LABORATORIES James H. Eide Battelle Columbus Laboratories Jennifer Griffin, Murthy Devarakonda IT Corporation Mark Whittaker GTS Duratek Tod
More informationLA-UR-10-TBD. M.E. Cournoyer, Ph.D., and R.L. Dodge
LA-UR-10-TBD Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Title: Pollution Prevention Benefits of Non-Hazardous Shielding Glovebox Gloves 11000 Authors: M.E. Cournoyer, Ph.D., and R.L. Dodge
More informationSmall Scale Nuclear Power: an Option for Alaska? Gwen Holdmann, Director
Small Scale Nuclear Power: an Option for Alaska? Gwen Holdmann, Director Alaska Center for Energy and Power University of Alaska History Overview of of Nuclear Presentation Energy What is nuclear energy?
More informationReport on Defense-Related Legacy Uranium Mines in the United States
Report on Defense-Related Legacy Uranium Mines in the United States David S. Shafer, PhD, Acting Director of Site Operations Office of Legacy Management US Department of Energy October2013 2013 Technical
More informationBasics. R/P depends on how it is used. High estimate is about 150 years, low estimate is about 40 years. More on this later
Nuclear Power Basics R/P depends on how it is used. High estimate is about 150 years, low estimate is about 40 years. More on this later Rapid growth in 1970 s and 1980 s then stagnant growth still happening
More informationComposition of the U.S.DOE Depleted Uranium Inventory
Composition of the U.S.DOE Depleted Uranium Inventory The past use of uranium recycled from spent fuel for the feed of U.S. uranium enrichment plants raises a number of questions concerning the composition
More informationDisposal Options for Radioactive Waste
Disposal Options for Radioactive Waste Stefan Mayer, IAEA 8th edition of the International Summer School on Nuclear Decommissioning and Waste Management 1st Workshop on Planning R&D towards Geological
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY COMPLETE STATEMENT MIKE FERGUSON CHIEF, COST AND TECHNICAL BRANCH/ENGINEERING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY COMPLETE STATEMENT OF MIKE FERGUSON CHIEF, COST AND TECHNICAL BRANCH/ENGINEERING DIVISION U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, HUNTINGTON DISTRICT BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
More informationBarry Miles. Deputy Director, Reactor Refueling Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program
Barry Miles Deputy Director, Reactor Refueling Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Overview of Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) Overview of Container Shipments Shipping
More informationWM2016 Conference Panel Report. Panel: US DOE WIPP: Lessons Learned and Return to Operations Following 2014 Operational Incidents
PANEL SESSION 15: Co-Chairs: Panel Reporter: Panel: US DOE WIPP: Lessons Learned and Return to Operations Following 2014 Operational Incidents Todd Shrader, US DOE-EM, Carlsbad Field Office Phil Breidenbach,
More informationCUSTOMER AUDIT HANDBOOK CORPORATE OVERVIEW
CUSTOMER AUDIT HANDBOOK CORPORATE OVERVIEW Corporate Headquarters 251 East Front Street, Suite 400, Boise, ID 83702 (800)590-5220 * (208)331-8400 INTRODUCTION This customer audit handbook provides environmental
More informationSpent Fuel and Waste Disposition
Office of Nuclear Energy Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition William Boyle Director, Office of Spent Fuel & Waste Science and Technology Office of Nuclear Energy INMM 32 nd Spent Fuel Management Seminar In
More informationInterim Storage of Used Nuclear Fuel. The Nuclear Energy Institute
Interim Storage of Used Nuclear Fuel January 2008 The Nuclear Energy Institute NEI is the organization responsible for establishing unified nuclear industry policy on matters affecting the nuclear energy
More informationOffice of Nuclear Energy Research and Development. Jay Jones Office of Nuclear Energy Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project
Office of Nuclear Energy Research and Development Jay Jones Office of Nuclear Energy Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group Meeting January 27, 2016
More informationCAPABILITIES STATEMENT
CAPABILITIES STATEMENT 2014 Longenecker & Associates, Inc. Innovative and cost-effective solutions to challenges in the environmental management, defense and energy industries since 1989 1 THE L&A TEAM
More informationICEM DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENVI SIMULATOR TO ESTIMATE KOREAN SNF FLOW AND ITS COST
Proceedings of the 12 th International Conference on Environmental Remediation And Radioactive Waste Management ICEM 2009 October 11-15, 2009, Liverpool, England, UK ICEM 2009 16060 DEVELOPMENT OF THE
More informationWM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Collaboration in Long-Term Stewardship at DOE s Hanford Site 13019
ABSTRACT Collaboration in Long-Term Stewardship at DOE s Hanford Site 13019 *Rick Moren, PG, *David Brown, **Ella Feist, ***Keith Grindstaff, PMP, ***Jamie Zeisloft *Mission Support Alliance, LLC, Richland,
More informationNUCLEAR POWER: Prospects in the 21st Century
NUCLEAR POWER: Prospects in the 21st Century Mike Corradini Nuclear Engr. & Engr. Physics WINS: Wisconsin Institute of Nuclear Systems Background Information Population continues to increase worldwide
More informationWaste Management for Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants An EPRI Decommissioning Project Report
Waste Management for Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants An EPRI Decommissioning Project Report Rich McGrath (Presenter) - EPRI Consulting Employee Rick Reid, PhD - Senior Technical Leader Symposium
More informationRadioactive-Waste Classification in the United States: History and Current Predicaments
UCRL-CR-128127 S/C # B332804 Radioactive-Waste Classification in the United States: History and Current Predicaments M. D. Lowenthal July 1997 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory DISCLAIMER This document
More informationENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF TRANSPORTATION TO THE POTENTIAL REPOSITORY AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF TRANSPORTATION TO THE POTENTIAL REPOSITORY AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN R.L. Sweeney, USDOE Yucca Mountain Project; R. Best, Jason and Associates; P. Bolton, P. Adams, Booz-Allen & Hamilton
More informationFast Reactor Fuel Cycle Cost Estimates for Advanced Fuel Cycle Studies
Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Cost Estimates for Advanced Fuel Cycle Studies Technical Meeting on Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycle Facilities with Improved Economic Characteristics IAEA Headquarters, Vienna,
More information[ P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. National Nuclear Security Administration
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/27/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-27303, and on FDsys.gov [6450-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY National
More informationIssues with petroleum
Issues with petroleum Limited reserves (near peak in Hubbert curve) Trade deficit (most oil imported) Externalities (military costs, environmental impacts) Environmental pollution (persistent combustion
More informationTHE STATE OF LLRW DISPOSAL IN. John O Neil Chase Environmental
THE STATE OF LLRW DISPOSAL IN THE UNITED STATES Presented by: John O Neil Chase Environmental Group, Inc. A Brief History of LLRW Disposal in the U.S. A Detailed ldlook at North Carolina Current LLRW Activities
More informationAtomic Energy of Canada Limited CORPORATE PLAN SUMMARY TO
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited CORPORATE PLAN SUMMARY 2017-18 TO 2021-22 Table of Contents. 1 Executive Summary 2 Mandate 3 Corporate Profile 6 Operating Environment 11 Objectives and Plans 24 Annex A.
More informationConsiderations for Disposition of Dry Cask Storage System Materials at End of Storage System Life
Considerations for Disposition of Dry Cask Storage System Materials at End of Storage System Life Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies Nuclear Energy
More informationWM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. The Sellafield Plan
The Sellafield Plan - 12458 Mr Iain Irving, Stakeholder Relations Director, Sellafield Ltd, Cumbria, UK ABSTRACT The Sellafield Performance Plan represents the start of a new era for the Sellafield site.
More informationHanford Site River Corridor Cleanup Effectiveness of Interim Actions and Transition to Final Actions
WM2014 Conference, March 2-6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA Hanford Site River Corridor Cleanup Effectiveness of Interim Actions and Transition to Final Actions - 14468 J. A. Lerch*, L. J. Cusack**, J. A.
More informationU.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, Response to IPC 1000 Independence Ave SW. Washington, DC
TO: FR: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, Response to IPC 1000 Independence Ave SW. Washington, DC 20585 consentbasedsiting@hq.doe.gov Donna Gilmore SanOnofreSafety.org San Clemente,
More informationDevelopment of FBR Fuel Cycle Technology in Japan
International Conference on Fast Reactors And Related Fuel Cycles: Development of FBR Fuel Cycle Technology in Japan December 8, 2009 H. FUNASAKA, T. KOYAMA, T. NAMEKAWA and T. NAGATA Advanced Nuclear
More informationThe Importance of Interim Storage in the Management of Higher Activity Radioactive Waste
in the Management of Higher Activity Radioactive Waste February 2017 Contents 1. Purpose of the document 1 2. The lifecycle of HAW 1 3. Storage of HAW implementing Government policies 1 4. Storage of HAW
More informationJ STI INTEGRATED MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. Steven E. Aumeier B. Gail Walters
J831 2 1 1997 STI INTEGRATED MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Steven E. Aumeier B. Gail Walters Technology Development Division Argonne National Laboratory-West P. 0. Box 2528 Idaho
More informationPlanning for the Decontamination of the Plutonium Fuel Form (PuFF) Facility Savannah River Site (SRS), South Carolina
Planning for the Decontamination of the Plutonium Fuel Form (PuFF) Facility Savannah River Site (SRS), South Carolina - 10095 Richard J. Abitz, Andrew J. Duncan, Marie C. Kane, Raymond A. Dewberry, Joseph
More informationRenseignements supplémentaires Intervention orale. Supplementary Information Oral intervention. Presentation from Don Hancock
Deep Geologic Repository Joint Review Panel Commission d examen conjoint du projet de stockage dans des couches géologiques profondes PMD 13-P1.169A File / dossier : 8.01.07 Date: 2013-08-27 Edocs: 4193686
More informationRepository Perspective
Repository Perspective Peter Swift Sandia National Laboratories DOE Fusion-Fission Hybrid Workshop Gaithersburg, MD October 1, 2009 Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a
More informationNuclear Waste Management Forum
Monday, November 27, 2017 6:30-9:00p.m. Registration and Opening Reception - Hermitage C/D ~ Vendor Area Open Tuesday, November 28, 2017 7:15-8:00a.m. Registration and Breakfast - Hermitage C/D ~ Vendor
More informationDISPOSITION OF ORNL S SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL*
DISPOSITION OF ORNL S SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL* D.W. Turner Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC P.O. Box 4699, Building 7078F, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6402 B.C. DeMonia Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office P.O.
More informationNeutron Capture by 238 U 239 Pu
Neutron Capture by 238 U 239 Pu 90 Sr proton neutron 238 U 92 In fuel most of what these released neutrons hit is 238 238 U β 239 U 92 β 137 Cs 239 94 Pu 239 93 Np formation of the actinides Energy Equivalence
More informationYucca Mountain. High-level Nuclear Waste Repository
Yucca Mountain High-level Nuclear Waste Repository The purpose of the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project is to determine if Yucca Mountain, Nevada, is a suitable site for a spent nuclear fuel
More informationL. Stern Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance th Street, NW, Suite 803 Washington, DC 20036
The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance North American Standard Level VI Inspection Program: Ensuring Safe Transportation of Radioactive Material - 9408 L. Stern Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance 1101
More informationOVERVIEW CAPACITY & CONDITION
OVERVIEW Over 18,000 sites and an associated 22 million acres of land are related to the primary hazardous waste programs that comprise much of the nation s hazardous waste infrastructure, and more than
More informationPlutonium-238 and the Radioisotope Power Systems Supply Chain Office of Nuclear Energy
Plutonium-238 and the Radioisotope Power Systems Supply Chain Office of Nuclear Energy Tracey Bishop Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy February 27, 2017 What are Radioisotope
More informationImprovements in Hanford TRU Program Utilizing Systems Modeling and Analyses
Improvements in Hanford TRU Program Utilizing Systems Modeling and Analyses P. A. Baynes, K. B. Bailey, D. E. McKenney Fluor Hanford, Inc. PO Box 1000, Richland, WA 99352 E. Uytioco Fluor Government Group
More informationRSRL Update. IMechE Nuclear. Conference 27 June Tony Wratten RSRL Managing Director
RSRL Update IMechE Nuclear Decommissioning Conference 27 June 2012 Tony Wratten RSRL Managing Director RSRL - WHO ARE WE? 2 sites Harwell (Oxfordshire) and Winfrith (Dorset) 100 miles apart Turnover ~
More informationRADIOACTIVE WASTES AND THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE
RADIOACTIVE WASTES AND THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE Robert Alvarez Senior Scholar Institute for Policy Studies February 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 2 INTRODUCTION. 2 CONSOLIDATED STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR
More informationRADIOLOGICAL FIELD CHARACTERIZATION OF LOW LEVEL WASTE BY MEASURING SURFACE CONTAMINATION AND CALCULATING TOTAL AND SPECIFIC ACTIVITY
RADIOLOGICAL FIELD CHARACTERIZATION OF LOW LEVEL WASTE BY MEASURING SURFACE CONTAMINATION AND CALCULATING TOTAL AND SPECIFIC ACTIVITY ABSTRACT Gary Bracken RMRS Brian Colby GTS Duratek Rocky Mountain Remediation
More informationStatus Report on IDN Activities
Eleventh Annual Meeting of the International Decommissioning Network (IDN) Vienna, 4-6 December 2017 Status Report on IDN Activities Patrick O Sullivan Decommissioning Specialist Waste Technology Section
More informationLEAD SUBSTITUTION AND ELIMINATION STUDY, PART II
ABSTRACT LEAD SUBSTITUTION AND ELIMINATION STUDY, PART II Timothy P. Martinez, and Michael E. Cournoyer, Ph.D.* Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 665-7616 Within the Nuclear Materials
More informationExcellence in Control of Radiation Exposures
Excellence in Control of Radiation Exposures Kenneth W. Crase Abstract Savannah River Site (SRS) operating contractors have continuously maintained excellence in the control of radiation exposures to both
More informationLinde FUSRAP Site Tonawanda, New York
Linde FUSRAP Site Tonawanda, New York U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Building Strong Buffalo District February 2016 FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action
More information