Building consensus on a generic water scarcity indicator for LCA-based water footprint: preliminary results from WULCA
|
|
- Silas Shelton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Building consensus on a generic water scarcity indicator for LCA-based water footprint: preliminary results from WULCA Anne-Marie Boulay 1,*, Jane Bare 2, Lorenzo Benini 3, Markus Berger 4, Inga Klemmayer 5, Michael Lathuilliere 6, Philippe Loubet 7, Alessandro Manzardo 8, Manuele Margni 1, Montserrat Núñez 7, Bradley Ridoutt 9, Sebastien Worbe 10, Stephan Pfister 11 1 CIRAIG, Ecole Polytechnique of Montreal, Canada 2 US EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 3 European Commission, Joint Research Center Sustainability Assessment Unit, Ispra (VA), Italy 4 Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Sustainable Engineering 5 Hamburg University of Technology, Institute for Water Resources and Water Supply, Germany 6 Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada 7 Irstea, UMR ITAP, Montpellier, France 8 CESQA, University of Padua, Department of Industrial Engineering, Italy 9 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Sustainable Agriculture National Research Flagship, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria 3169, Australia 10 Veolia Environment Research & Innovation, France 11 ETH Zurich, Institute of Environmental Engineering Corresponding author. anne-marie.boulay@polymtl.ca ABSTRACT Consuming water can affect human health (e.g. by reducing availability of irrigation water and hence food availability), ecosystems (by decreasing water availability for terrestrial/aquatic species) and future generations (by depleting non-renewable resources). However, no standard method exists to quantify the stress on water without favoring any of these areas of protection. Stress/scarcity indexes have focused on an anthropocentric perspective, and a few on an ecocentric perspective. We explore the possibility of developing an indicator considering the water resource as a whole and propose a method which is not centered on an area of protection but rather assesses the extent to which all water demand and availability differ within a watershed (i.e. hydrocentric). This concept can eventually serve as a single metric to assess potential impacts from water use and be used consistently in the application of the upcoming ISO standard and for ecolabelling of food and energy products. Keywords: water use impact assessment, Water Footprint, environmental impacts, water stress, water scarcity 1. Introduction Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has served as a decision-making tool to help reduce environmental impacts for several decades. Recently, the methodology was used to assess water-specific impacts and group them in a new water footprint concept, currently being framed in an upcoming ISO standard (ISO/FDIS 14046, 2014). While this document provides principles, requirements and guidelines, no specific characterization method is recommended even though several have emerged in the last five years to assess impacts from water use (Kounina et al. 2013). The need for a consensus-based method is clear and particularly relevant for food production systems where product-level environmental labels and declarations are already emerging. In 2013, the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative recognized the need for a consensual method following the many existing water use impact assessment methods described by Kounina et al. (2013), and solicited the Water Use in LCA Working Group (WULCA), fostering method development and applications since 2007, to undertake this task. By bringing together method developers and experts from the fields of LCA, hydrology, ecology, etc., WULCA will propose by the end of 2015, consensus-based indicators to assess impacts from water use, which can be used to comply with the requirements of the ISO document. This paper presents the water footprint concept as defined in the upcoming ISO standard, and WULCA s progress towards a consensus-based method. As agriculture accounts for over 70% of water withdrawal and its water consumption is estimated to increase by a 20% by 2050 (WWAP, 2014), combined with the fact that agri-food global businesses are expanding and hence putting new stress on local aquifers (WBCSD, 2012), the food sector is benefitting most from such methodological developments. 142
2 1.1. LCA and water footprinting In contrast with an LCA, an LCA-based water footprint is the fraction of LCIA results which are related to water resource. These LCIA results include impacts associated with water use, and the subsequent effect on water availability for humans and ecosystems, as well as direct impacts on the water resource and its users from relevant emissions to air, soil and water (see Fig.1). These latter impacts are quantified using traditional LCA impact categories (e.g. freshwater eutrophication, freshwater acidification, human toxicity and eco-toxicity). A water footprint may be presented as the result of a stand-alone assessment or as a sub-set of results of a larger environmental assessment, such as an LCA. As per the ISO standard, a qualifier is used when a water footprint study is limited to certain aspects only. A water scarcity footprint and a water availability footprint assess impacts associated with water use only, whereas a water footprint (no qualifier ) assesses all relevant impacts related to water, hence including relevant emissions that occur without any water use and yet still impact water (e.g. SO x emissions to air causing freshwater acidification). In the recent years, businesses have started to include scarcity indicators (sometimes also called stress indicators) to assess potential impacts of water use. In the context of the standard, this is the equivalent of a water scarcity footprint, or a water availability footprint (if the change in water availability caused by water degradation is also included). However, at this point no consensus-based approach exists for doing so and results are not always comparable when different scarcity/stress indicators are used for characterization. Figure 1: Representation of a water footprint with respects to LCA impact categories (figure from Impact World + (Bulle et al. 2014)) Scarcity From the ISO definition, scarcity is the extent to which demand for water compares to the replenishment of water in an area, such as a drainage basin (ISO ). Up until now, water scarcity indexes have been built to reflect the problem as one for either humans or ecosystems. Most indexes (Pfister et al. 2009; Boulay et al. 2011; Frischknecht et al. 2009; Gassert et al. 2013) considered only human water use divided by water availability (see Eq.1). A few others (Smakhtin et al. 2004; Hoekstra et al. 2012) have considered that water scarcity should exclude water requirement for ecosystems to be maintained in fair condition, resulting in an index that shows whether the human water use impairs ecosystems (>1) or not (<1) (see Eq.2). Hence, none of these indicators represents a neutral assessment of the relationship between all water demand and availability. 143
3 The main gap is that no indicator exists where demand for water in an area is compared with availability in such a way that modeling choices and interpretation of the physical meaning are explicit and transparent. human water use Scarcity Anthropocentric = Fn ( ) Eq. 1 water availability human water use Scarcity Ecocentric = Fn ( ) Eq. 2 water availability ecosystem water requirement 1.3. Consensus-based indicator project from WULCA WULCA commenced a new two-year activity in January 2014 aiming at developing consensus-based indicator(s) for water use impact assessment. The first steps defined a framework (based on previous WULCA deliverable (Bayart et al. 2010; Kounina et al. 2013)) and led to the identification of the three sets of indicators on which to focus (see Fig.2): 1) The impact pathway leading to damages on human health is already modeled by different methods and ready for harmonization (Boulay et al. 2014). Hence it was included in the work and a consensus-based methodology defining this impact pathway is under development. 2) The ecosystem impact pathway includes several methodologies with possible complementary assessments (Kounina et al. 2013). A subgroup was formed to harmonize the different impact pathways in this category, by defining a consistent framework and possibly identify a midpoint indicator early in the impact pathway. 3) Answering the demand from industry for a generic (not human- or ecosystem-oriented) and recommended stress/scarcity indicator, a specific sub-group focused its efforts on the development of such a metric. It was set out as an indicator independent of other impact pathways and not leading directly to any endpoint damages. Further harmonization with the conventional midpoint-endpoint framework may come later as the indicators further develop. This paper is presented by the sub-working group focusing on this last stress-based midpoint indicator and presents results of the findings to date. The impact pathways leading to impacts on resources or compensation processes were considered not sufficiently mature to be included in this consensus building phase. Figure 2. Chosen impact pathways for WULCA s consensus building work. 144
4 2. Methods In order to provide a scarcity indicator which represents a generic assessment of the demand and availability of water in a region, we define scarcity following ISO/FDIS definition, as shown in Eq.3, where the total water demand includes all users, human and non-human, and water availability includes the available renewable resource. This indicator is therefore not anthropocentric or ecocentric, but simply based on the water resource, i.e. hydrocentric. Scarcity hydrocentric = Fn ( Total water demand ) Renewable water availability Eq.3 To illustrate the difference in scarcity definitions, we compare the three approaches using eq. 1-3 without a scaling function (just the ratios) in a simple preliminary assessment. Not all necessary high quality data was available at this early stage of the project and proxy data was used to illustrate the concepts. Human water consumption (HWC) from WaterGap (Alcamo et al. 2003) was used to represent water demand from humans. Environmental water requirements (EWR) assessment from Smakthin et al. (2004) were used to represent ecosystem water demand. These values represent the portion of the available flow required to maintain ecosystems in a fair condition, defined by the authors as moderate or considerable modification from the natural state where the sensitive biota is reduced in numbers and extent. This state represents a modeling choice which should be agreed on and assessed with corresponding data. This data is regionalized and readily available for the entire globe, and was used as a first assessment to illustrate the concepts; it does not yet include terrestrial ecosystems water requirements and may not represent the best data available. Water availability (WA) data from WaterGap (Alcamo et al. 2003) was used for this first assessment. 3. Results Figures 3, 4, and 5 illustrate the different scarcity ratios: anthropocentric, ecocentric and hydrocentric, respectively. They are calculated using the ratios presented in Eq. 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The difference between anthropocentric and ecocentric scarcity is negligible for most of the world, with few watersheds showing visibly higher scarcity in the ecocentric case (hardly visible on a black and white scale). This makes sense, since the scarcity level is increased by environmental flow requirements but the pattern is not changed. Not surprisingly, results on Fig.5 show higher scarcity in most regions of the world for the hydrocentric indicator since this includes ecosystem water demand within the numerator of the equation and therefore also regions with no human water consumption show some scarcity. Figure 6 shows the difference in results between the anthropocentric indicator and hydrocentric indicator. At a minimum, scarcity increases in comparison to the anthropocentric approach between around the world. Most of North and South America, Europe and Central Asia increases between , and some watersheds in the USA and Eastern Europe increase by up to This difference represents exactly the EWR percent of available water assessed by Smakhtin et al. (2004), which varies from 0-47%. By integrating ecosystem s water requirement, this approach therefore gets rid of the artifact that water scarcity in desert areas is 0 if no human is using water, as discussed in Berger et al (2014). Figure 7 shows the difference in results between the hydrocentric approach and the ecocentric indicator. In this case, some highly scarce regions show a higher indicator with the ecocentric indicator than with the hydrocentric approach, but these regions are still consistently at the top of the scarcity scale. As a mathematical demonstration, if one hypothetical region shows a water availability of 100 m 3, with 90% of this amount being consumed by humans (90 m 3 ), yet having a EWR value of 40% (40 m 3 ), the ecocentric indicator would result in 90/(100-40) = 1.5, indicating that the water use is tapping into the ecosystem s requirements. A hydrocentric approach results in ( )/100 = 1.3, indicating the shared pressure on both human and ecosystem needs for water. 145
5 Scarcity Anthropocentric Figure 3. Anthropocentric scarcity assessment showing the ratio of consumed water by humans to available water (HWC/WA). Scarcity Ecocentric Figure 4. Ecocentric scarcity assessment showing the ratio of consumed water by humans to available water, to which water for ecosystem has been subtracted (HWC/(WA-EWR)). Scarcity Hydrocentric Figure 5. Hydrocentric scarcity assessment based on the ratio of all water demand to all water available, showing the pressure on the water resource ((HWC+EWR)/WA). 146
6 Difference Hydrocentric - anthropocentric Figure 6. Difference (decimal percentage) between the hydrocentric approach as shown in Fig.5 and the anthropocentric scarcity shown in Fig.3. Difference Hydrocentric - ecocentric Figure 7. Difference (decimal percentage) between the hydrocentric approach as shown in Fig.5 and the ecocentric scarcity shown in Fig Discussion Results presented in this paper show intermediate work as the working group progresses towards a consensual indicator. At this point, we have identified that scarcity indicators used until now have been focused mainly on potential impacts on humans, and some towards ecosystems, but none reflected simply the pressure on the resource coming from the demand of all local water users in comparison with the availability. At this point, potential impacts on ecosystems from water use have only been accounted for at the endpoint level (e.g. Pfister et al. 2009, Hanafiah et al. 2011). A combination of human and ecosystem impacts based on endpoint methods and subsequent weighting of these indicators have been suggested by Ridoutt and Pfister (2013). However, such aggregated endpoint-based CF integrate a weighting scheme, which is only allowed by ISO as an additional and subsequent step following impact characterization, after first obtaining separated impact category indicator results. This ensures that value choices are transparently provided and eventually can be adapted to the values of the decision maker. While such weighted methods are still being investigated (Ridoutt and Pfister, 2014), the objective of the approach presented in this paper is rather to provide a generic indicator representing potential problems associated with water use in relation with the local scarcity, without focusing on one area of protection. Findings of this paper indicate that an indicator that assesses scarcity following the ISO definition and considering all water demand can provide an alternative perspective and better reflect the potential consequences of using water in different areas around the world. Hydrocentric scarcity values are higher than anthropocentric scarcity values and generally higher than ecocentric scarcity values (except in highly (eco)scarce regions), and hence may allow the quantification of potential problems in such regions that have been excluded so far on the scarcity level. 147
7 However, the main challenges lie in the proper attribution of ecosystem water needs compared to human water consumption and the data availability to develop a global indicator of reasonable quality for robust assessments. In this paper, human water consumption was used, along environmental water requirements for ecosystems based on fair conditions, which is not based on the same reference and hence still introduces some bias. Results would likely differ and scarcity values increase if the same perspective on demand is taken. However, this was performed as a preliminary assessment with readily available data, and defining and assessing the water demand from humans and ecosystems with the same underlying basis (e.g. actual water demand, ideal/pristine water demand, etc.) is necessary to reduce bias and remain transparent. Best available data should be used to represent the water demand both from a human and an ecosystem perspective, including aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, with special attention to wetlands (Verones, Pfister, et al. 2013; Verones, Saner, et al. 2013). Different definitions and sources of data exist to quantify water availability, whether current or pristine for example, and this aspect should be investigated and the most relevant source for this indicator chosen. Also, while this work has shown only blue water-related data, interactions with green water and the change in blue water associated with land use change should be investigated. Coherence among the sources of data, the geographic and temporal resolution, and close analysis to prevent double counting are important aspects that should be analyzed. 5. Conclusion This work provided an overview of the relationship between LCA, water scarcity, water availability and water footprinting, in light of the upcoming ISO standard It quantifies the characterization factors for different interpretations of the scarcity concept and applied directly the ISO definition to provide a first glance at a generic hydrocentric indicator of water scarcity quantifying the pressure on the water resource in a region by relating the water demand and availability. Results show higher scarcity in comparison with the currently used anthropocentric methods as it encompasses a larger problematic. The WULCA working group is further developing this indicator through ongoing investigating of data sources, hypothesis, data resolutions and choices associated with this novel approach. 6. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the financial support of WULCA s sponsors: Cascades, Cotton Incorporated, Danone, ExxonMobil, GDF SUEZ, Hydro-Québec, Unilever and Veolia. 7. References Alcamo, J. et al., Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48(3), pp Bayart, J.-B. et al., Framework for assessment of off-stream freshwater use within LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(5), p.439. Berger, M. et al., Water Accounting and Vulnerability Evaluation (WAVE): Considering Atmospheric Evaporation Recycling and the Risk of Freshwater Depletion in Water Footprinting. Environmental science & technology, 48(8), pp Available at: Boulay, A.-M. et al., Regional Characterization of Freshwater Use in LCA: Modeling Direct Impacts on Human Health. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(20), pp Available at: Boulay, A.-M. et al., Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, DOI /s Bulle, C. et al., Impact World +. Frischknecht, R., Steiner, R. & Jungbluth, N., The Ecological Scarcity Method - Eco-Factors 2006: A method for impact assessment in LCA U.-W. N. 0906, ed. Gassert, F. et al., AQUEDUCT Global Maps 2. 0, Washington, D.C. 148
8 Hoekstra, A. Y., Mekonnen, M. M., Chapagain, A. K., Mathews, R. E., & Richter, B. D. (2012). Global Monthly Water Scarcity : Blue Water Footprints versus Blue Water Availability. PLoS ONE, 7(2). doi: /journal.pone ISO 14046, Water footprint Principles, requirements and guidelines, Kounina, A. et al., Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, pp Available at: Pfister, S., Koehler, A. & Hellweg, S., Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(11), pp Available at: Ridoutt, B.G. & Pfister, S., A new water footprint calculation method integrating consumptive and degradative water use into a single stand-alone weighted indicator. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, pp Smakhtin, V., Iwra, M. & Water, I., A Pilot Global Assessment of Environmental Water Requirements and Scarcity., 29(3), pp Verones, F., Saner, D., et al., Effects of Consumptive Water Use on Biodiversity in Wetlands of International Importance. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, pp Verones, F., Pfister, S. & Hellweg, S., Quantifying Area Changes of Internationally Important Wetlands Due to Water Consumption in LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, pp WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development) (2009). Water for Business Initiatives guiding sustainable water management in the private sector. Visited online 23/04/2014 WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme), The United Nations World Water Development Report 2014: Water and Energy. Paris, UNESCO. 149
9 This paper is from: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector 8-10 October San Francisco Rita Schenck and Douglas Huizenga, Editors American Center for Life Cycle Assessment
10 The full proceedings document can be found here: It should be cited as: Schenck, R., Huizenga, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014), 8-10 October 2014, San Francisco, USA. ACLCA, Vashon, WA, USA. Questions and comments can be addressed to: ISBN:
Outcome of WULCA harmonization activities: recommended characterization factors for water footprinting
Outcome of WULCA harmonization activities: recommended characterization factors for water footprinting LCA FOR FEEDING THE PLANET AND ENERGY FOR LIFE Stresa, October 7, 2015 Stephan Pfister 1, Jane Bare
More informationWater Footprinting: Where are we now?
Water Footprinting: Where are we now? DF50, Zurich, Tuesday December 4 th, 2012 Anne-Marie Boulay, M.Sc.A. Ph.D. Student CIRAIG Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal Plan Timeline of water footprint and Water/LCA
More informationIntroduction to Water Assessment in GaBi Software
Introduction to Water Assessment in GaBi Software Version 1.0 November 2012 Authors Dr. Annette Koehler a.koehler@pe-international.com Daniel Thylmann d.thylmann@pe-international.com PE INTERNATIONAL AG
More informationWater Use Metrics in Energy Systems
Water Use Metrics in Energy Systems Dr. Jesse Daystar Nicholas School of the Environment Duke University Assistant Director - Duke Center for Sustainability & Commerce Jesse.daystar@duke.edu 1 Agenda Background
More informationWater Footprint: Application in the food industry. J.B. Bayart. [avnir] 4 Nov 2011 Lille
[avnir] 4 Nov 2011 Lille Footprint: Application in the food industry J.B. Bayart 07/11/2011 ) Veolia Environnement Recherche & Innovation jean-baptiste.bayart@veolia.com Impacts of water use: a gaining
More informationEnvironmental impacts of cultured meat: alternative production scenarios
Environmental impacts of cultured meat: alternative production scenarios Hanna L. Tuomisto 1,*, Marianne J. Ellis 2, Palle Haastrup 1 1 European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment
More informationWater footprinting: Context, approach and future perspectives
Water footprinting: Context, approach and future perspectives Agrion, May 10, 2012 Samuel Vionnet Water project expert Samuel.vionnet@quantis-intl.com Sébastien Humbert VP, Scientific affairs Sebastien.humbert@quantis-intl.com
More informationRefining the water footprint concept to account for non- renewable
Sarah Dickin McMaster University, Canada Refining the water footprint concept to account for non- renewable water resources Discussion Paper 1303 January 2013 This article outlines the rationale for further
More informationa practical guide for SMEs ISO Environmental management Water footprint
a practical guide for SMEs ISO 14046 Environmental management Water footprint a practical guide for SMEs ISO 14046 Environmental management Water footprint Copyright protected document All rights reserved.
More informationPRODUCT WATER FOOTPRINTING: HOW TRANSFERABLE ARE THE CONCEPTS FROM CARBON FOOTPRINTING?
PRODUCT WATER FOOTPRINTING: HOW TRANSFERABLE ARE THE CONCEPTS FROM CARBON FOOTPRINTING? B.G. Ridoutt 1, S.J. Eady 2, J. Sellahewa 3, L. Simons 4 and R. Bektash 5 1 CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering,
More informationThe World Food LCA Database project: towards more accurate food datasets
The World Food LCA Database project: towards more accurate food datasets Laura Peano 1,*, Xavier Bengoa 1, Sébastien Humbert 1, Yves Loerincik 1, Jens Lansche 2, Gérard Gaillard 2, Thomas Nemecek 2 1 Quantis,
More informationComparison of CO2e emissions associated with regional, heated and imported asparagus
Comparison of CO2e emissions associated with regional, heated and imported asparagus Florian Schäfer, Michael Blanke *, Jacob Fels INRES - University of Bonn, Auf dem Huegel 6, D-53121 Bonn, Germany Corresponding
More informationImplementing LCA Results for Primary Production in the Agri-Food Sector
Implementing LCA Results for Primary Production in the Agri-Food Sector Kerrianne Koehler-Munro 1,*, Alexandre Courchesne 2, Aung Moe 1, Roger Bryan 1, Tom Goddard 1, Len Kryzanowski 1 1 Alberta Agriculture
More informationEnvironmental LIFE CYCLE Information for Products Used Every Day in Households
Environmental LIFE CYCLE Information for Products Used Every Day in Households INTRODUCTION The environmental performance of different product options is of growing importance to producers, retailers,
More informationTool for Environmental Analysis and Management (TEAM ) Demonstration
Tool for Environmental Analysis and Management (TEAM ) Demonstration Annie Landfield First Environment, Inc. Seattle, WA September 22, 2003 Agenda 1) Intro to LCA and TEAM (15 Minutes): Objectives of the
More informationLife Cycle Assessment (LCA)
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Author: Vincenzo Piemonte, Associate Professor, University UCBM Rome (Italy) 1.Theme description The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) allows to evaluate the interactions that a product
More informationApplication of the Water Footprinting Concept for Sustainable Water Management
Application of the Water Footprinting Concept for Sustainable Water Management Acknowledgements Funding Agencies Water Research Foundation Anglian Water, UK Project Manager Maureen Hodgins, Water Research
More informationLosses in the supply chain of Swedish lettuce wasted amounts and their carbon footprint at primary production, whole sale and retail
Losses in the supply chain of Swedish lettuce wasted amounts and their carbon footprint at primary production, whole sale and retail Ingrid Strid *, Mattias Eriksson Department of Energy and Technology,
More informationInstruction Manual. New Generation Carbon Footprinting. thanks to the Dynamic carbon footprinter v1.0
Instruction Manual New Generation Carbon Footprinting thanks to the Dynamic carbon footprinter v1.0 1 Acknowledgements Production This guide was produced by the CIRAIG Author Annie Levasseur, CIRAIG Supervision
More informationIntegrating Biodiversity Loss in LCA A Perspective from the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative s Secretariat
42 nd LCA Discussion Forum: Integrating Biodiversity in LCA Integrating Biodiversity Loss in LCA A Perspective from the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative s Secretariat Guido Sonnemann, Sonia Valdivia, Mireille
More informationInvestigation of sustainable national water resources management of India in a changing climate
22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 3 to 8 December 2017 mssanz.org.au/modsim2017 Investigation of sustainable national water resources management of India
More informationUniversity of Huddersfield Repository
University of Huddersfield Repository Georgopoulou, Anneza, Angelis Dimakis, Athanasios, Arampatzis, George and Assimacopoulos, Dionysis Eco efficiency assessment in the agricultural sector: The case of
More informationUsing databases from different data providers in parallel for a case study on light bulbs
Using databases from different data providers in parallel for a case study on light bulbs Andreas Ciroth GreenDelta GmbH San Francisco, LCAXIV, Oct 8 2014 Using databases from different data providers
More informationThis project was conducted to support the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affair s Inclusive Green Growth aim of increasing water use efficiency by
October 2016 This project was conducted to support the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affair s Inclusive Green Growth aim of increasing water use efficiency by 25% in Dutch financed projects. The project
More informationNatural capital valuation of a t-shirt
Natural capital valuation of a t-shirt Heinz Zeller, March 2016 HUGO BOSS HUGO BOSS AT A GLANCE HUGO BOSS March 2016 3 HUGO BOSS AT A GLANCE A Global Success Story ~13.000 130 EMPLOYEES WORLDWIDE COUNTRIES
More informationGHG Emissions from an Aquaculture System of Freshwater Fish with Hydroponic Plants
GHG Emissions from an Aquaculture System of Freshwater Fish with Hydroponic Plants Kumiko Ohgaki 1, Yoko Oki 2, Atsushi Inaba 3 1 Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute
More informationModeling fuel use for specific farm machinery and operations of wheat production
Modeling fuel use for specific farm machinery and operations of wheat production Frédéric Pelletier *, Stéphane Godbout, Luc Belzile, Jingran LI Research and Development Institute for the Agri-Environment
More informationWATER STEWARDSHIP POSITION STATEMENT
WATER STEWARDSHIP POSITION STATEMENT The current situation Water is an increasingly stressed resource, recognised as one of the key challenges of the 21 st century. A third of the global population lives
More informationModule 6. Life Cycle Assessment
Module 6. Life Cycle Assessment NSF Summer Institute on Nano Mechanics and : A Short Course on Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, and Green Manufacturing for Creating Sustainable Technologies June 20-24, 2005
More informationClosure Report of Working Group Environment (WG-ENV) Strategy Theme: Basin
(WG-ENV) 1. Background Strategy Theme: Basin Prepared by Dr Sylvain R. Perret 1, Dr Michael van der Laan 2, and Prof. Nobumasa Hatcho 3 This document aims at reporting on the mandate of ICID Working Group
More informationILCD Handbook: Framework and requirements for LCIA models and indicators
EUR 24586 EN - 2010 The mission of the JRC-IES is to provide scientific-technical support to the European Union s Policies for the protection and sustainable development of the European and global environment.
More information1 Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment
Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment 1 Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment This section of the handbook introduces the concept of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Videos 2, 3 and 4 of the GaBi Paper Clip
More informationAdvice to decision maker on coal mining project
. Advice to decision maker on coal mining project IESC 2015-063: West Muswellbrook Project New Development Requesting agency The New South Wales Mining and Petroleum Gateway Panel Date of request 27 January
More informationDraft resolution on promoting conservation, restoration and sustainable management of coastal blue carbon ecosystems
RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS 54th Meeting of the Standing Committee Gland, Switzerland, 23 27 April 2018 Doc. SC54-21.9 Draft resolution on promoting conservation, restoration and sustainable management
More informationWater Footprint for cotton irrigation scenarios utilizing CROPWAT and AquaCrop models
European Water 59: 285-290, 2017. 2017 E.W. Publications Water Footprint for cotton irrigation scenarios utilizing CROPWAT and AquaCrop models M. Zoidou, I.D. Tsakmakis, G.D. Gikas * and G. Sylaios Laboratory
More informationPrinting and Writing Papers Life- Cycle Assessment Frequently Asked Questions
Printing and Writing Papers Life- Cycle Assessment Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is LCA? Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is a comprehensive environmental accounting tool with wellestablished procedures
More informationLife Cycle Assessment-based Product Claims
Life Cycle Assessment-based Product Claims Prepared for the West Coast Climate and Materials Management Forum Photo image area measures 2 H x 6.93 W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or
More informationCanada s Freshwater Quality in a Global Context Indicator
Canada s Freshwater Quality in a Global Context Indicator Data Sources and Methods March 2011 Cat.#: En4-144/3-2011E-PDF ISBN: 978-1-100-17978-0 1. Introduction This report is released under the Canadian
More informationLife Cycle Assessment of Ecosystem Services for Phoenix s Building Stock. Janet Ferrell, Graduate Student Mikhail Chester, Assistant Professor
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING AND THE BUILT Life Cycle Assessment of Ecosystem Services for Phoenix s Building Stock Janet Ferrell, Graduate Student Mikhail Chester, Assistant
More informationOVERHEAD GLAZING ALUMINUM SLOPED CURTAIN WALL
ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION OVERHEAD GLAZING ALUMINUM SLOPED CURTAIN WALL Kawneer Company, Inc., part of Arconic's global Building and Construction Systems (BCS) business, has provided the commercial
More informationDECISION. FORTY-SIXTH SESSION OF THE IPCC Montreal, Canada, 6 10 September 2017
FORTY-SIXTH SESSION OF THE IPCC Montreal, Canada, 6 10 September 2017 (10.IX.2017) Agenda Item: 7 ENGLISH ONLY DECISION CHAPTER OUTLINE OF THE WORKING GROUP II CONTRIBUTION TO THE IPCC SIXTH ASSESSMENT
More informationTHE INTERNATIONAL EPD COOPERATION (IEC) PCR BASIC MODULE. CPC Division 68: Postal and courier services VERSION 1.
THE INTERNATIONAL EPD COOPERATION (IEC) PCR BASIC MODULE CPC Division 68: Postal and courier services VERSION 1.0 D 2009-03-03 03-03-2009 2/16 How to use PCR Basic Modules based on the UN CPC structure...
More informationSAI Platform Australia water footprint pilot project: wheat, barley and oats grown in the Australian state of New South Wales
SAI Platform Australia water footprint pilot project: wheat, barley and oats grown in the Australian state of New South Wales Summary report Brad Ridoutt and Perry Poulton November, 2009 Enquiries should
More informationPROJECTED & CASEMENT WINDOWS ALUMINUM WINDOWS
ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION PROJECTED & CASEMENT WINDOWS ALUMINUM WINDOWS Kawneer Company, Inc., part of Arconic's global Building and Construction Systems (BCS) business, has provided the commercial
More informationHUNG & SLIDING WINDOWS ALUMINUM WINDOWS
ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION HUNG & SLIDING WINDOWS ALUMINUM WINDOWS Kawneer Company, Inc., part of Arconic's global Building and Construction Systems (BCS) business, has provided the commercial construction
More informationOverview and highlights
This country profile was compiled by the OECD Secretariat and reflects information available as of March 2015. Further information and analysis can be found in the publication: OECD (2015) Water Resources
More informationMINISTÈRE DES AFFAIRES ÉTRANGÈRES ET EUROPÉENNES 20 December /5 6th World Water Forum Ministerial Process Draft document
MINISTÈRE DES AFFAIRES ÉTRANGÈRES ET EUROPÉENNES 20 December 2011 1/5 6th World Water Forum Ministerial Process Draft document 1. We the Ministers and Heads of Delegations assembled in Marseille, France,
More informationNW STD 20CM GLPW CONCRETE BLOCK
Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) NW STD 20CM GLPW CONCRETE BLOCK is pleased to present this environmental product declaration (EPD) for the Normal Weight Standard (NW STD) 20CM Glass Powder (GLPW)
More informationMillennials Inheritance Revisited by Alberto Bientinesi, FAO Volunteer
Millennials Inheritance Revisited by Alberto Bientinesi, FAO Volunteer September 2017 An uncomfortable inheritance Planetary boundaries and a decadelong crisis have replaced the after-war concept of infinite
More informationDOCUMENTATION (Version 1)
UNEP/SETAC scientific consensus model for characterizing human toxicological and ecotoxicological impacts of chemical emissions in life cycle assessment DOCUMENTATION (Version 1) USEtox 2.0 Documentation
More informationLife Cycle Environmental Assessment of Engineering Plastics compounds :
Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Engineering Plastics compounds : towards an advanced level of data quality. TM Jean-François VIOT Françoise LARTIGUE Congrès ACV Lille 6-7 nov 2012 Agenda Rhodia
More informationLEADERSHIP Closer to you and the environment
THE FOOTPRINT OF LEADERSHIP Closer to you and the environment LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT CONTENTS 1 ENVIRO HAS THE SMALLEST ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT 2 WHAT IS A LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT? 4 THIS IS ENVIRO S ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationWater Resource Sustainability Metrics and Tools for the Energy Sector
Water Resource Sustainability Metrics and Tools for the Energy Sector Laura Weintraub, PE LimnoTech ENV VISION Environmental Vision - An International Electricity Sector Conference May 10-11, 2016 Washington,
More informationTHE EU ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT METHODOLOGY. What can it deliver and what not?
THE EU ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT METHODOLOGY What can it deliver and what not? p.2 PRODUCT ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINTS A viewpoint from environmental NGOs WHO WE ARE AND WHAT ISSUES WE WORK ON CAN WE BUILD
More informationThis project was conducted to support the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affair s Inclusive Green Growth aim of increasing water use efficiency by
October 2016 This project was conducted to support the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affair s Inclusive Green Growth aim of increasing water use efficiency by 25% in Dutch financed projects. The project
More informationProject Order Proforma 2015
Project Order Proforma 2015 1. Short Project Title (less than 15 words) Whole of life cycle greenhouse gas assessment of the exploitation of the Surat Basin gas reserve: global benefits and risks Long
More informationBritish Columbia s. VVater Act. Modernization. Policy Proposal on British Columbia s new Water Sustainability Act. December 2010
British Columbia s VVater Act Modernization Policy Proposal on British Columbia s new Water Sustainability Act December 2010 British Columbia has a rich heritage in our lakes, rivers and streams. Linked
More informationLEXMARK MS810DN ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION MONO LASER PRINTER
ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION LEXMARK MS810DN MONO LASER PRINTER Lexmark hardware, software and services combine to help our customers securely and efficiently capture, manage and print information.
More informationWater scarcity footprint of primary aluminium
Int J Life Cycle Assess (2016) 21:1605 1615 DOI 10.1007/s11367-015-0997-1 LCA OF METALS AND METAL PRODUCTS: THEORY, METHOD AND PRACTICE Water scarcity footprint of primary aluminium Kurt Buxmann 1 & Annette
More informationPolpropylene (PP-R) Pressure Piping Systems ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION
Polpropylene (PP-R) Pressure Piping Systems ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION The declared, average piping system includes the following products: aquatherm green pipe, mechanical piping that is especially
More informationPerformance Standard 6 V2
Introduction 1. Performance Standard 6 recognizes that protecting and conserving biodiversity, maintaining ecosystem services, and sustainably managing living natural resources are fundamental to sustainable
More informationOrganisation Environmental
Organisation Environmental Footprint Guide EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Environment and Sustainability H08 Sustainability Assessment Unit DRAFT ONLY FOR USE IN STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
More informationTRIFAB FRAMING SYSTEMS AND STOREFRONT FRAMING SYSTEMS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING SYSTEMS
ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION TRIFAB FRAMING SYSTEMS AND STOREFRONT FRAMING SYSTEMS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING SYSTEMS Kawneer Company, Inc., part of Arconic's global Building and Construction Systems
More informationInformation Requirements Table for Liquid Waste
Applicant Summary Tracking # Authorization # Applicant / Facility Name Ministry of Environment Prepared by: Title Date The Information Requirements Table (IRT) for Liquid Waste is a tool used by Ministry
More informationGuidance document Life cycle assessment for the self-adhesive label
Guidance document Life cycle assessment for the self-adhesive label Prepared by Why is Life Cycle Assessment useful? Labels play a critical role in the communication and marketing of products. The growing
More informationProtection of Australia s freshwater ecosystems
Protection of Australia s freshwater ecosystems Jonathan Nevill OnlyOnePlanet Consulting, Australia Discussion Paper 1248 November 2012 This article looks at the status and trends of biodiversity conservation
More informationLecture 1 Integrated water resources management and wetlands
Wetlands and Poverty Reduction Project (WPRP) Training module on Wetlands and Water Resources Management Lecture 1 Integrated water resources management and wetlands 1 Water resources and use The hydrological
More informationUK CARES Sustainability Scheme; Enabling Sustainable Procurement. Ayhan Tugrul Business Development Manager
UK CARES Sustainability Scheme; Enabling Sustainable Procurement Ayhan Tugrul Business Development Manager + Contents CARES Organization and assurance services provided as not-for-profit company structure
More informationIntegrated Metrics for Improving the Life Cycle Approach to Assessing Product System Sustainability
Sustainability 2014, 6, 1386-1413; doi:10.3390/su6031386 Article OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Integrated Metrics for Improving the Life Cycle Approach to
More informationProduct Biodiversity Footprint
Caroline Catalan 1, Suzanne Rabaud 1, Hugo Anest 1, Benjamin Lévêque 1, Anne-Claire Asselin 2, Guillaume Neveux 1, Niels Jungbluth 3 1 I Care & Consult, 28 rue du 4 Septembre 75002 Paris, France; 2 Sayari,
More informationTC 111 ITALY [TBD] The title of TC 111 is Environmental Standardization for Electrical and Electronic Products and Systems.
SMB/6127/R STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN (SBP) IEC/TC OR SC: SECRETARIAT: DATE: TC 111 ITALY [TBD] Please ensure this form is annexed to the Report to the Standardization Management Board if it has been prepared
More informationEPD Environmental Product Declaration EPD 2202 MATRIX REVESTIMENTO FACHADA BY VOTORANTIM CIMENTOS (50 KG PACK)
EPD ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION EPD Environmental Product Declaration EPD 2202 MATRIX REVESTIMENTO FACHADA BY VOTORANTIM CIMENTOS (50 KG PACK) ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT Registration number: S-P-00897
More informationLife Cycle Assessment vs. CO 2 -Footprint Coop s position on CO 2 -Labelling and LCA s. Christian Rüttimann Public Affairs and Sustainability
Life Cycle Assessment vs. CO 2 -Footprint Coop s position on CO 2 -Labelling and LCA s Christian Rüttimann Public Affairs and Sustainability Content Profile of Coop Main Sustainability Issues Coop and
More informationCriteria for good biodiversity indicators for forest management in the context of product life cycle assessment
Criteria for good biodiversity indicators for forest management in the context of product life cycle assessment Final report 21st February 2008 Bo P. Weidema 2.-0 LCA consultants, Hørsholm 1. Introduction
More informationAccounting and Reporting Protocol for Avoided Greenhouse Gas Emissions along the Value Chain of Cement-based Products
Accounting and Reporting Protocol for Avoided Greenhouse Gas Emissions along the Value Chain of Cement-based Products Version 1.0 for public release. 15.01.2016 2016 LafargeHolcim 2 Content Executive Summary
More informationDesigning the Key Features of a National PRTR System
UNITAR Guidance Series for Implementing a National PRTR Design Project Supplement 2 Designing the Key Features of a National PRTR System July 1997 UNITAR Guidance Series for Implementing a National Pollutant
More informationOther issues for Volume 2 of the revised SEEA
LG/15/6 15 th Meeting of the London Group on Environmental Accounting Wiesbaden, 30 November 4 December 2009 Other issues for Volume 2 of the revised SEEA Peter Comisari OTHER ISSUES FOR VOLUME 2 OF THE
More informationThis project was conducted to support the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affair s Inclusive Green Growth aim of increasing water use efficiency by
October 2016 This project was conducted to support the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affair s Inclusive Green Growth aim of increasing water use efficiency by 25% in Dutch financed projects. The project
More informationAdvancing Natural Capital Accounting A New GEO initiative: Earth Observations for Ecosystem Accounting (EO4EA)
Advancing Natural Capital Accounting A New GEO initiative: Earth Observations for Ecosystem Accounting (EO4EA) A new intiative: demand and user driven John Matuszak U.S. Department of State Bureau of Oceans,
More informationSession 3 case study: Improving corporate decisionmaking by valuing ecosystems James Griffiths, WBCSD
Payments for Ecosystem Services: What role for a green economy? United Nations, Geneva 4 5 July 2011 Session 3 case study: Improving corporate decisionmaking by valuing ecosystems James Griffiths, WBCSD
More informationAn Integrated Approach for the Management of Uncertainty in Decision Making Supported by LCA-Based Environmental Performance Information
An Integrated Approach for the Management of Uncertainty in Decision Making Supported by LCA-Based Environmental Performance Information L. Basson a,b and J.G. Petrie a,b a Department of Chemical Engineering,
More informationThe European soil information system and its extension to the Mediterranean Basin
The European soil information system and its extension to the Mediterranean Basin Montanarella L. in Zdruli P. (ed.), Steduto P. (ed.), Lacirignola C. (ed.), Montanarella L. (ed.). Soil resources of Southern
More informationEnvironmental Footprint pilot phase Imola Bedo
Environmental Footprint pilot phase Imola Bedo Environmental Footprint Team DG Environment B1 Sustainable Production, Products & Consumption Why EF pilot phase Strong request from industry o o calling
More informationIndicator 6.4.2: Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources
Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all Target 6.4: By 2030, substantially increase water-use efficiency across all sectors and ensure sustainable withdrawals
More informationAccess from the University of Nottingham repository:
Liu, Junguo and Yang, Hong and Gosling, Simon N. and Kummu, Matti and Flörke, Martina and Pfister, Stephan and Hanasaki, Naota and Wada, Yoshihide and Zhang, Xinxin and Zheng, Chunmiao and Alcamo, Joseph
More informationReview of existing frameworks and tools for developing eco-efficiency indicators
Meso-level eco-efficiency indicators to assess technologies and their uptake in water use sectors Collaborative project, Grant Agreement No: 282882 Deliverable 1.4 Review of existing frameworks and tools
More informationRequirements on Consumer Information about Product Carbon Footprint
New ANEC study Requirements on Consumer Information about Product Carbon Footprint SUMMARY Single number CO 2 labels make no sense this is one of the major conclusions of a new ANEC study carried out by
More informationFramework for Carbon Footprints for paper and board products. April 2017
Framework for Carbon Footprints for paper and board products April 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary Climate change has become a topic of high public interest. Building on this, politicians are
More informationEnvironmental Product Declaration
Environmental Product Declaration According to ISO 14025 Fabricated Steel Reinforcing Bar (Rebar) Issue Date: August 7, 2017 Valid Until: August 7, 2022 Copyright ASTM International, 300 Barr Harbor Drive,
More informationUncertainty analysis of cattle-based product LCA related to model variables: case study of milk production in Belgium
Uncertainty analysis of cattle-based product LCA related to model variables: case study of milk production in Belgium Michaël Mathot 1, Florence Van Stappen 2, Astrid Loriers 1, Viviane Planchon 1, Jérémie
More informationBanco Santander white paper on private climate finance
Banco Santander white paper on private climate finance The purpose of this white paper is to analyze the impact that the global agreement on climate change has on privately-owned banks. Thus, it details
More informationISO 14001:2015 Updates and Key Themes
ISO 14001:2015 Updates and Key Themes November 10, 2016 Alex Lowry Agenda Overview of changes in ISO 14001:2015 standard Discussion of key ISO 14001:2015 themes Context of the organization Internal and
More informationConcrete Just Got Greener
Concrete Just Got Greener About Cadman Inc. Life Cycle Impact Results (per m 3 ) Declared Unit: 1 m 3 of 10,000 psi concrete at 28 days OPERATIONAL IMPACTS PerformX PECC10K Plant Operating Energy (MJ)
More informationYear in Review: Global Water Quality Data
Year in Review: Global Water Quality Data Results: Development and maintenance of global water quality data and information systems to improve accessibility to credible and comparable data; and contribution
More informationGROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT APPROACH: GUIDANCE FOR APPLICATION PN 1568 ISBN PDF
GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT APPROACH: GUIDANCE FOR APPLICATION PN 1568 ISBN 978-1-77202-038-0 PDF Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2.
More informationWater use: Critical link between hydrosphere & anthroposphere
Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, Germany Water use: Critical link between hydrosphere & anthroposphere Joseph Alcamo, Center for Environmental Systems Research, University
More informationWater Management and Biodiversity
Group Water Management and Biodiversity Jim Rushworth - 09/07/12 Areas Covered by this Presentation: The Global Water Challenge Lafarge Approach to Water Management Biodiversity Management within Lafarge
More informationAssessing the sustainability of freshwater systems: A critical review of composite indicators
DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0792-7 REVIEW Assessing the sustainability of freshwater systems: A critical review of composite indicators Derek Vollmer, Helen M. Regan, Sandy J. Andelman Received: 6 January 2016
More informationTeaching Ecological Economics: Climate, Energy, Water
Teaching Ecological Economics: Climate, Energy, Water International Society for Ecological Economics Washington, D.C. June 29, 2016 Jonathan M. Harris and Anne-Marie Codur http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae Copyright
More informationKey Environmental Performance Indicators for a simplified LCA in food supply chains
Key Environmental Performance Indicators for a simplified LCA in food supply chains Geneviève Doublet 1, Gyda Mjöll Ingólfsdóttir 2, Eva Yngvadóttir 2, Birgit Landquist 3, Niels Jungbluth 1, Anna Aronsson
More information