London Freight Forum

Transcription

1 Heading London Freight Forum 04 October 2013 Palestra, 197 Blackfriars Road, Southwark, London SE1 8NJ 1

2 Introduction Heading Graham Inglis CEO, DHL Supply Chain 2

3 Housekeeping Heading Toilets - are located at the back of the room Fire Alarm - there are no fire alarm tests scheduled for today - if the alarm sounds, please follow staff to the emergency exits Emergencies - please contact TfL staff or reception Mobile phones please switch off. Thank you. 3

4 Agenda Heading 1. Chairman's Introduction and background 2. TfL Welcome 3. HGVs and Cycle Safety 4. Construction and Safety 5. TfL Activity 6. What next for the Roads Task Force? Refreshment Break 7. Reducing Penalty Charge Notices 8. Ultra Low Emission Zone (plan and discussion) 9. AOB and questions 10. Wrap-up Refreshments and Networking 4

5 Forum Heading background A Legacy 7 th today Forum originally established to improve planning for London 2012 Games Hosted by TfL, Chaired by Industry Attended by senior representatives from: freight operators businesses trade associations and sector-specific groups London boroughs, regulatory and highway authorities (including VOSA, Police) 4 held prior to the Games, 2 since Held twice per year 5

6 Forum Heading aims Build and develop productive working relationships (operators, local authorities and TfL) to collaboratively produce industry-wide solutions that benefit London Improve the understanding of road freight and its vital contribution to the economy, ensuring all stakeholders recognise freight requirements, restrictions and daily challenges and freight is considered at all stages in the design and management of London s roads and streets Build an evidence base to increase the availability and transparency of information, demonstrating the impact and maximising the uptake of best practice behaviours 6

7 Key Heading themes of the day Delivering a road freight legacy Working together for safer, greener and more efficient deliveries in London HGV and cycling safety linked to the recent DfT and Mayoral announcement The Roads Task Force, recommendations and subsequent actions Activities to reduce PCNs Understanding proposals for an Ultra Low Emission Zone Your opportunity to: promote ongoing partnership working within the industry ensure that we are prepared for the future growth of the Capital 7

8 Welcome Heading Sir Peter Hendy Commissioner, Transport for London 8

9 HGVs Heading and Cycle Safety Sir Peter Hendy Commissioner, Transport for London 9

10 Cycling Heading and HGV fatalities Year Total no. of pedal cycle fatalities No. involving a goods vehicle (over 3.5 tonnes) % of fatalities involving a goods vehicle (over 3.5 tonnes) 2013 YTD (Sept 25th) % % % % 10

11 Target Heading reduce KSI by 40% by

12 HGV Heading and cycle safety 4 September 2013: DfT and Mayor announced plans to tackle HGV safety and support London s cycling revolution Enforcement : Industrial HGV Task Force: dangerous HGV drivers, vehicles and operators Cycle Task Force: improving cyclist anti-social and illegal behaviour DfT to review exemptions to current HGV regulations DfT and Driving Standards Agency issued a call for evidence about how driver training could change Call for EU to speed up reviewing the design of HGVs to increase visibility The Mayor to ask Londoners for their views on whether to use powers for a "safer lorry scheme" on any HGV not fitted with basic safety equipment 12

13 Construction Heading and safety Glen Davies Programme Manager, Freight & Fleet, TfL 13

14 Freight Heading impact on road safety Tragically, between 2008 and 2012: 53% of cycling fatalities involved HGVs HGVs represent 4% of London s road miles driven This includes a disproportionate number of construction vehicles 14

15 Targeted Heading enforcement Over 70% of Police HGV roadside stops identify regulatory infringements 15

16 Identifying Heading causes & improving evidence the management of work-related road risk clearly lags behind the management of more general health and safety. Page 10 there seems to be an underlying attitude that managing road risk is not a legitimate use of time. Page 12 it can be seen that the area not directly or indirectly visible on the mixer (21m 2 ) is 50% greater than that of the curtain side (14m 2 ). Page 15 16

17 Road Heading risk less important than site risk So would you report [an on-road collision] to the site management here? No, because it s in the roads, it s nothing to do with the site. So if it happens on site then it s generally, it s a totally different story, but if it happens in the street then it s down to whoever it is these people have got enough to do. Primary subcontractor 17

18 Lack Heading of ownership in supply chains When they [your subcontractors] leave the site, do you see any responsibility then for their driving safety? No Primary subcontractor 18

19 Lack Heading of awareness in supply chains The industry doesn t know that these accidents are occurring the industry is not going to do much about it until they re told how do you get everybody else to [improve their safety] unless you re telling them that these things are going on? Primary subcontractor 19

20 Delivery Heading time slots = driver pressure Primary subcontractor They do [feel pressured to arrive on time], there s no question about that if you don t get there on time your delivery just does not get in, it gets sent away so companies are under a lot of pressure to manage their deliveries, to get them to sites when they need it. 20

21 Influencing Heading safety and compliance Through procurement and contracts Through planning consent process 21

22 Construction Heading Logistics & Cycle Safety (CLOCS) Project Goal: To deliver a step change in work related road safety in the construction industry Project Outcomes: 1.1 Increased availability and uptake of new lorries with 100 percent all round vision and maximum driver direct vision 1.2 All existing lorries are fitted with appropriate all round vision equipment as standard 2. For work related road safety cultures within construction logistics operations to be considered as important as that of health and safety culture on construction sites 3. An (Approved) Code of Practice for the construction logistics sector that enables transparency and ownership of work related road risk for developers, their clients and construction logistics operators Workstream 1: Improving vehicle safety Workstream 2: Addressing the safety imbalance Workstream 3: Encouraging adoption of best practice 22

23 Wider Heading logistics industry involvement Inputs Is road risk managed differently in other logistic sectors? Can retail delivery site risk assessments be adapted for the construction sector? Why do general haulage vehicles have more direct vision than vehicles designed for construction logistics? Outputs Whole industry could benefit from improved driver direct vision Common code of practice may be adapted for wider logistic operations Logistics industry could take leadership role for management of work related road safety 23

24 Thank Heading you To get involved

25 TfL Heading Activity Ian Wainwright Head of Freight & Fleet Programmes, TfL 25

26 TfL Heading Activity Delivering a road and fleet legacy Re-timing deliveries FORS update Freight and Fleet team 26

27 Delivering Heading a road freight legacy Developed through collaboration with the Industry Builds on 2012 Games legacy Embeds ongoing work Programme aligned to other activity Informs the long-term freight strategy 27

28 What Heading the legacy includes Better planning: Analysis of growth and nature of freight traffic Delivery and Servicing Plan guidance Freight and servicing activity reflected in criteria for TfL roads Freight considered in the design and management of all TfL-funded schemes Promote similar considerations in schemes not funded by TfL 28

29 What Heading the legacy includes Improving safety: Implement recommendations from Construction Logistics & Cycle Safety research report Ensure industry input into proposed Safer Lorry Scheme Finalise review of FORS Develop and promote site assessment guidance for safe and legal loading Develop common code for managing work-related road risk in construction Work with regulators & executive bodies for widespread adoption of code of practice Work with industry & manufacturers to maximise visibility in future vehicle design 29

30 What Heading the legacy includes Improving kerbside access: Revise kerbside loading guidance Enhance existing industry toolkit to help minimise PCNs and maximise compliance Pilot freight survey for typical London high street Further surveys to identify freight demand, facilities, enforcement and perceptions Detail lessons learnt and methodology Produce recommendations for improving kerbside access 30

31 What Heading the legacy includes Increasing efficiency: Finalise review of home delivery activity for discussion with working group Explore the variety of options to increase freight efficiency across sectors Work with Canal and River Trust / Port of London Authority to develop water freight planning tool and increase understanding of waterways 31

32 What Heading the legacy includes Effective communications: New freight content added to the re-launched TfL website Review communications channels to maximise uptake Journey planning: Review data formats to improve information provision Develop journey planning approaches to assist planning and reduce congestion 32

33 What Heading the legacy includes Retiming deliveries and collections: In detail... 33

34 Why Heading re-time deliveries? 34 34

35 Retiming Heading deliveries and collections London Out-of-Hours Consortium October 2013 boroughs, retailers, London Councils, FTA, RHA A comprehensive review of re-timing activity Publish and promote stakeholder guidance October 2013 Initiate long-term trial December 2013 Develop an initial briefing document for London boroughs December 2013 Develop guidance for boroughs and operators March 2014 Develop a driver training programme for quieter deliveries April

36 Out-of-hours Heading deliveries and servicing Progress so far Out-of-hours Deliveries Consortium FTA, RHA, 2 boroughs and 1 major retailer confirmed, meeting 31 October Publish and promote stakeholder guidance: Web go-live end of October Initiate a long-term trial: Procurement of technical support services underway, December start ontrack Initial borough briefing and borough guidance: Consortium to scope Operator Guidance and driver training: Toolkit - April

37 FORS Heading 37

38 Fleet Heading Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) Running FORS Over the past year FORS registrations have increased by over 90% Over 3000 drivers have been trained on Safe Urban Driving Over 620 managers have undertaken a FORS best practice workshop Growing FORS Industry clients now specifying FORS accreditation in contracts Growing beyond London with a national and international reach Fleet sectors such as coaches and community transport adopting FORS Financing FORS TfL committed to ensuring FORS delivers benefits for London Wider national uptake growing beyond TfL s remit A review is underway to determine options for the future of FORS 38

39 Freight Heading & Fleet Team Ian Wainwright Head of Freight and Fleet Steve Steele Logistics Efficiency Glen Davies Safety & Environment Tim Ward Engagement & Comms Chris Clements Danny Luu Fiona Rose Gaz Raqib Jacqueline Short Hannah White Andy McCarroll Mohammed Mashud Vacancy - TBC Jaz Chani Angela McConville 39

40 Freight Heading & Fleet Ian Wainwright Head of Freight and Fleet Steve Steele Logistics Efficiency Glen Davies Safety & Environment Tim Ward Engagement & Comms Out-of-hours Trials Kerbside Access Route Planning Consolidation Alternative Modes Data and Research Safety and Risks Vehicle design Driver training FORS Cleaner Fuels LaMiLo (EU Project) Forum and Events Industry Liaison Freight Bulletins External Comms Press Publications 40

41 Thank Heading you For further information: 41

42 What next for the Roads Task Force Joseph Uzoka Senior Delivery Planning Manager, Planning, Surface Transport?? London Freight Forum 4 th October 2013

43 Roads Task Force - New Approach London s streets and roads need a coherent and long-term strategy The RTF has set out an ambitious vision for improvements in different areas across London This needs to be integrated with a wider strategy to maintain the overall functioning of London s road network

44 London needs world-class roads and streets Differing Functions of the London Roads Moving Living Unlocking Functioning Protecting Sustaining Street Types approach Range of Tools Infrastructure and assets fit for the future More efficient / flexible use of space Intelligent systems and management Changing behaviour / managing demand Substitute / re-located /enhanced capacity

45 The RTF s headline recommendations Adopt the RTF s vision and aims A bold approach is needed Develop strategic measures Improve governance Adopt the street family approach Implement measures from Toolbox. Also Try new things - pilots! Use world leading technology Enhance evaluation and review Engage like never before!

46 TfL s response TfL have worked closely with the RTF and welcome its report Published in tandem TfL s response outlines... Our work to date Immediate activity Longer term actions

47 Six work streams 1. Project development and delivery 2. Street type and service level development 3. High level vision and strategic measures 4. Capability and partnership development 5. Monitoring and evaluation 6. Comms and stakeholder engagement

48 Project development and delivery Unparalleled 4bn investment programme Key task is to use total available options to meet London s road challenges A significant programme of improvements: Tackle congestion Improve London s public spaces and streets Get more from our road network Make it easy & attractive to walk, cycle & take the bus Help London grow Make our streets safer, greener and cleaner Ensure assets are fit for the future Reflect the RTF s vision and parallel work streams

49 Project development and delivery Unparalleled 4bn investment programme Key task is to use total available options to meet London s road challenges A significant programme of improvements: Tackle congestion Improve London s public spaces and streets Get more from our road network Make it easy & attractive to walk, cycle & take the bus Help London grow Make our streets safer, greener and cleaner Ensure assets are fit for the future Reflect the RTF s vision and parallel work streams

50 The programme includes innovations, pilots and trials A corridor pilot to understanding the street types and their associated service levels Trialling out-of-hours delivery and servicing pilots Pilot using logistics information and collaborative ways of working to reduce congestion from the growth of internet shopping Supporting the roll out of 20 mph zones on boroughs roads and trialling 20 mph limits on some parts of the TLRN. Trial flexible lane management Trial sites for early start traffic signal technology for cyclist Work with the boroughs to create public spaces which can change their use over time and be managed through moveable street furniture And many more... 50

51 The programme includes innovations, pilots and trials A corridor pilot to understanding the street types and their associated service levels Trialling out-of-hours delivery and servicing pilots Pilot using logistics information and collaborative ways of working to reduce congestion from the growth of internet shopping Supporting the roll out of 20 mph zones on boroughs roads and trialling 20 mph limits on some parts of the TLRN. Trial flexible lane management Trial sites for early start traffic signal technology for cyclist Work with the boroughs to create public spaces which can change their use over time and be managed through moveable street furniture And many more... 51

52 Applying street types Engaging fully throughout... Street Types senior stakeholder group Meeting to be arranged for mid October Working group incl. TfL, GLA and borough officers etc tbc Inclusive programme of engagement shaped by the working group and assured by the mini RTF senior stakeholder group Workshops? Seminars? Pilots?

53 We are confirming the need for strategic measures and their feasibility before commencing more detailed studies Confirm the case for strategic measures and their feasibility This needs to be done first to provide the context for strategic studies Inner ring road Key corridors Orbital road tunnel Demand m gment Freight in London The scale of the challenge for these studies to address will be confirmed by the initial strategic case analysis Timescales: Start asap and aim to complete by late

54 High level vision and strategy Freight in London 2 interdependent elements 1) Longer term strategy Objective: to set out the longer term (c5-20year) strategy to support freight & servicing activity, 2) Operational management plan Objective: to establish the plan to support the freight and servicing industry s operations over the next 3-5 years, mitigating the potential impacts of the Mayor s cycling vision, improvements to the road network for vulnerable road users and other physical changes primarily in Central London.

55 Thank you Questions For further information: Web:

56 Break Heading 30 minutes 56

57 PCNs Individual and collaborative approaches to reduce PCNs Presentation to TfL s Freight Forum 4 October 2013 Natalie Chapman Head of Policy London Freight Transport Association

58 Why are PCNs a problem for the freight industry? Millions every year! Not just the cost of the PCN, but also the administration 50% over the last 3½ years (to June 2012) London is the biggest problem: 80% by 10 London authorities 60% by 4 authorities (TfL, Westminster, Camden & City of London) The rules for loading/unloading can be complex. The rules vary from council to council Have to take into account other restrictions Sometimes there is nowhere suitable to stop legally or the time allowed is too short

59 Advice & compliance material for companies Compliance Guide Driver Card Delivery Assessment Guide Code of Practice PCN spreadsheet PCN driver report pad PCN admin service Also check out individual borough websites for info

60 What should the freight industry do to reduce its PCN bill? 1. Read FTA s PCN compliance guide to understand the full process 2. Educate your drivers on the rules of loading/unloading (using FTA s PCN driver card) 3. Issue your drivers with an FTA PCN report pad from Shopfta to fill in when they receive a PCN. 4. If you receive a PCN, decide whether to pay or appeal quickly (if paying, do so within the 50% discount period). 5. Record your PCNs in a spreadsheet FTA has a good (free!) template and so does FORS 6. Analyse your PCN data to understand where your hotspots are using FTA s Delivery Assessment Guide 7. Find out about FTA s PCN Admin Service

61 Data Data Data

62 Delivery Assessments Identify top five hotspots Conduct a site visit Can you make changes to the time or location of the delivery? Is there an off-road loading facility? Can your customer be flexible on the time or day of their delivery? Contact the traffic authority Focus on your next five hotspots

63 G4S & Transport for London Working Collaboratively

64 Network Fit Brixton Trial Issues: Individual high street stops for each customer Service times same as peak flows Loading bay restrictions Night time use only Actions: Consolidated services Service times altered from peak commuter flow Use of alternative locations rear access etc Work with drivers on solutions Sep- 12 Oct- 12 Nov- 12 Dec- 12 Jan-13 Feb- 13 Mar- 13 Apr-13 May- 13 Jun-13 Jul-13 64

65 Network Fit Brixton Trial Outcome: G4S have resolved 50% - 2 incompliant locations left causing the other 50% TfL have provided remaining solutions by lifting a loading bay restriction & providing a compliant & safe parking spot Learning's: Where possible ensure all new customers comply with the current network fit Work closely with drivers eye s & ears Trying a new approach Currently parking 100% compliant 65

66 What should local authorities do to help? Understand the delivery needs in their area Recognise that needs change over time Work with their neighbouring authorities and develop a consistent system (i.e. 40 minutes loading/unloading on yellow lines) Plan delivery needs into new developments (don t forget home deliveries for residential properties) Ensure that enforcement officers understand the definition of loading and unloading Help advise drivers on where to stop enforcement should be the last resort Manage enforcement contracts effectively If lots of PCNs are being issued in the same area it is a failure in the system. Investigate Whilst PCNs can be appealed, this is resource intensive. Provide a back office service which can talk to companies about PCNs in bulk and run reports on outstanding PCNs. (City of Westminster is a great example)

67 What can TfL do to help? Increase loading bay times from 20 to 30 (or even 40) minutes as is being rolled out with parking bays. Scrap code 46 and use specific codes for specific contraventions Dedicated staff in back office to deal with PCNs

68 What should the Government do to improve the parking policy framework? Review the Traffic Management Act 2004 It s over 5 years since part 6 of the TMA came into operation Review the supporting operational guidance and provide more clarity around timescales for correspondence There are minimum time limits for issuing NTOs and Orders for Recovery but no clear maximum Consider merging PATAS and TPT Will give operational savings as only administering one service Will allow appellants wanting to appear in person for London hearings to be able to attend a hearing nearer to where they are based

69 Thank you Natalie Chapman Head of Policy London Freight Transport Association

70 Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) Michele Dix October 2013 TfL Planning - Environment

71 Contents London s challenges Objectives and wider outcomes ULEZ timetable Associated policies What is ultra low? Reducing pollutants Update of Euro VI vehicles Ultra Low Emission Zone variables Questions TfL Planning - Environment 71

72 London s challenges London suffers from poor air quality Causes and exacerbates health problems London at risk of being fined by the EU for missing targets on: NO 2 (Nitrogen Dioxide) not expected to comply with EU limit values until after 2020 PM (Particulate Matter) This year, four monitors have already recorded more than their daily allowance for PM 10 exceedance, with a further four monitoring sites having surpassed ¾ of their annual allowance for daily PM 10 exceedance so likely to go on to break their allowance for However none of these sites are part of the monitoring network used by Defra to assess compliance with the EU Directive, and as such do necessarily meet the strict location and equipment criteria. There is also strong policy drivers from the Government to encourage reduction in levels of carbon created by vehicles road transport responsible for 21% CO 2 emissions in central London, which equates to around 4% of the emissions across the Capital TfL Planning - Environment 72

73 London s challenges - PM 10 emissions sources in 2010 Rail 3% River <1% Resuspension 21% Petrol Car 33% Van 16% Other 7% Road Transport 47% Artic HGV 3% Industry 4% NRMM 13% Gas Non-domestic 1% Gas - Domestic 2% Aviation 2% Diesel Car 26% Motorcycle 1% Taxi 4% Rigid HGV 10% TfL Bus 5% Coach / other bus 2% TfL Planning - Environment 73

74 London s challenges - NO x emissions sources in 2010 Other 1% Rail 8% River 1% Van 12% Artic HGV 8% NRMM 14% Industry 7% Gas - Nondomestic 9% Gas - Domestic 7% Aviation 8% Road Transport 47% Car (petrol) 15% Car (diesel) 23% Motorcycle <1% Rigid HGV 17% TfL Bus 17% Taxi 4% Coach / other bus 5% TfL Planning - Environment 74

75 London s challenges CO 2 emissions sources in 2010 Industry 19% NRMM 2% Other 1% Rail 1% River 0% Van 10% Artic HGV 4% Gas - Nondomestic 16% Gas - Domestic 31% Road Transport 25% Car (petrol) 44% Car (diesel) 20% Taxi 3% Rigid HGV 9% TfL Bus 7% Coach / other bus 2% Aviation 4% Motorcycle 1% NB: locally emitted sources, excludes consumption of electricity outside London TfL Planning - Environment 75

76 Central London emissions sources NO x PM 10 CO 2 NB: not presented at forum additional slide in response to query. TfL Planning - Environment 76

77 London s challenges in Air Quality Hotspots Road vehicles not the only source of emissions: Airports Construction sites Industrial Areas Greatest amount of public exposure to air pollutants and highest amount of roadside activity occurs in central London EU limit 2020 NO 2 Annual Mean (µgm -3 ) Wider action plan still required to address exceedance elsewhere TfL Planning - Environment 77

78 Objectives and wider outcomes Primary Objective reduce air pollutant emissions from road transport particularly those with greatest health impacts, to support Mayoral strategies and contribute to achieving compliance with EU limit values Secondary Objective reduce CO 2 emissions from road transport to support Mayoral strategies and contribute to a London-wide reduction Wider outcomes Promote sustainable travel / mode shift Increase the proportion of ultra low or zero emission vehicles in London TfL Planning - Environment 78

79 Proposed Timetable February 2013 Announcement by the Mayor of air quality measures, LEZ Phase 5 and proposal for a ULEZ April 2013 Briefing to the Mayor on London s air quality and emissions challenges and ULEZ Central London and other hotspots will not achieve compliance with NO 2 limit values by 2020 Risk of PM 10 daily exceedence at selected non-reportable sites in 2013 June 2013 Mayor agreed a package of moderate, high and very high ambition measures to be taken through a feasibility assessment June -Dec 2013 Further ULEZ policy development looking at 3 levels of ambition: moderate, high, very high; feasibility assessment and stakeholder engagement December 2013 ULEZ policy options recommended to the Mayor to take through to public consultation Early 2014 Public consultation on scheme principle and further refinement of recommended policy options 2015 Public consultation on ULEZ scheme order TfL Planning - Environment 79

80 Associated policies Need to ensure any central London air quality management policy is consistent with other policies in development Roads Task Force Cycling/ Walking West End Mayor s 2020 Vision Freight Tourist Bus Action Plan Wider Air Quality issues will continue to be addressed through: The Mayor s Air Quality Strategy Transport Emissions Action Plan; and The Mayor s Low Emission Vehicle Road Map TfL Planning - Environment 80

81 What is ultra low? reducing air pollutants Euro standards All new vehicles must comply with current European standard Most vehicles in central London expected to be Euro V/5 by 2020 Euro VI likely to achieve significant improvement in NO x emissions New vehicles registered from 2014/15/16 (depending on vehicle type) need to meet Euro VI/6 standard brings about most significant reductions for diesel vehicles previous Euro standards failed to realise anticipated emission reductions Euro VI/6 will deliver savings over Euro V/5 but level of effectiveness is still being assessed UK Government Focussing on low carbon vehicles especially alternative fuels TfL Will need to specify a requirement for each vehicle type that can be enforced, is technology neutral and widely recognised Investigating what is needed to work towards meeting EU targets TfL Planning - Environment 81

82 Percentage of the fleet Euro 6 / VI Projected uptake of Euro VI vehicles BAU 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Taxi Petrol Car (national f leet) Diesel Car (national f leet) Petrol LGV Diesel LGV TfL Buses Coaches and non-tf L Buses Rigid HGV Articulated HGV NB: Car percentages based on national average estimates and central London profile likely to be more suitable Others based on estimates from London ANPR and TfL audit data TfL Planning - Environment 82

83 ULEZ Time and place? Boundary Greatest amount of public exposure to air pollutants and highest amount of roadside activity in central London Existing Congestion Charge Zone is understood by vehicle drivers and operates using an existing camera network Standard should be technology neutral and options need to consider how to incentivise low CO 2 technology Investigating times of operation of the zone consider feasibility of different time periods e.g. peak hrs, CC period, longer hrs, 24hrs, weekdays, weekends Understand impacts on day/night economies and roadside activity TfL Planning - Environment 83

84 ULEZ - Who will be affected? All types of vehicles being investigated HGVs Vans Cars and powered two-wheelers Taxis Private Hire Vehicles Coaches and non-tfl buses TfL buses Economic impact and compliance costs are being considered in the feasibility study Potential exemptions, mitigations and incentives are also being considered TfL Planning - Environment 84

85 Range of policies being investigated Moderate High Very high CO2 standard Euro VI Zero emission TfL Planning - Environment 85

86 Questions (to be used in the round table discussions) 1. Will the HGV and van market be ready to support a Euro VI/zero emission capable central London zone in 2020? 2. What policies are required for HGV and van manufacturers to bring zero emission or Euro VI vehicles to market in sufficient volume, at attractive prices and covering all market segments? 3. What steps/measures/incentives would help to ensure compliance and early adoption? 4. How can we help you engage further on ULEZ? TfL Planning - Environment 86

87 The Heading Ultra Low Emission Zone - Discussion On each table 1 member of the ULEZ team will lead discussion and feedback on what you have heard 20 minutes 87

88 Questions Heading - ULEZ discussion 1. Will the HGV and van market be ready to support a Euro VI/zero emission capable central London zone in 2020? 2. What policies are required for HGV and van manufacturers to bring zero emission or Euro VI vehicles to market in sufficient volume, at attractive prices and covering all market segments? 3. What steps/measures/incentives would help to ensure compliance and early adoption? 4. How can we help you engage further on ULEZ? 88

89 Thank you For further information: Please contact Esme Yuill at TfL Planning - Environment 89

90 AOB Heading & Question Session Graham Inglis CEO, DHL Supply Chain Sir Peter Hendy, Michele Dix, Leon Daniels, Ian Wainwright 90

91 Forum Heading wrap up Leon Daniels Managing Director, Surface Transport 91

92 Thank Heading You Networking & Refreshments Next London Freight Forum - April 2014 For further information: freight@tfl.gov.uk 92

93 Useful Heading Links Delivering a Road Freight Legacy Construction Logistics Plans Guidance for Planners and Developers Improving road safety through procurement Construction Logistics and Cyclist Safety Report Summary and Full Report Mayor s Vision for Cycling Mayor's Cycle Safety Action Plan Safe Streets for London: Road Safety Action Plan The Roads Task Force Report London Assembly Environment Committee on ULEZ 93