June 7, Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "June 7, Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC"

Rachel Wiggins
5 years ago
Views:

1 June 7, 2013 Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC Certified Mail Tracking Number: Dear Cliff: As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review (PIR) for the Jamestown, North Dakota Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) Area Mail Processing (AMP). In accordance with the Non-Disclosure Agreement dated February 11, 2013, the Postal Service is providing both redacted and unredacted copies of the PIR. If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension Sincerely, Neftali Pluguez A/Manager Contract Administration (APWU) Enclosures (CA )

REDACTED Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Facility Name & Type: Jamestown CSMPC Street Address: 212 2nd Street SW City: Jamestown State: ND 50 Facility ZIP Code: 58401 District: Dakotas

2 REDACTED Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Facility Name & Type: Jamestown CSMPC Street Address: 212 2nd Street SW City: Jamestown State: ND 50 Facility ZIP Code: District: Dakotas Area: Western Finance Number: Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 584 Miles to Gaining Facility: 97.8 EXFC office: Yes Plant Manager: Gerald Bercier Senior Plant Manager: Todd Snyder (A) District Manager: Roy T. Reynolds Facility Name & Type: Fargo P&DF Street Address: 657 2nd Avenue N OFC City: Fargo State: ND 50 Facility ZIP Code: District: Dakotas Area: Western Finance Number: Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 565, 580,581 EXFC office: Yes Plant Manager: Paul Rowe Senior Plant Manager: Todd Snyder (A) District Manager: Roy T. Reynolds Approval Date: September 16, 2011 Implementation Date: Jan PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jan : Jun Processing Days per Year: 310 Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,742 EAS Hours per Year: 1,819 Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/ New Facility Start-up Costs Update Date & Time this workbook was last saved: May 7, 2010 ~ ~ :58 Area Vice President: Vice President, Network Operations: Area AMP Coordinator: NAI Contact: Sylvester Black David E. Williams Stephen Murray Doris Billingslea I Sarah Grover PIR Data Entry Page

4 Executive Summary PIR Type: 1st PIR Last Saved: May 2, 2013 Date Range of Data: Jan Jun Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address: City: State: Current SCF ZIP Code(s): Type of Distribution Consolidated: Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address: City: State: Jamestown CSMPC 212 2nd Street SW Jamestown NO 584 Orig & Dest Fargo P&DF 657 2nd Avenue N OFC Savings/Costs 1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved Function 1 Workhour Savings Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint/Trans) PCES/EAS Workhour Savings Transportation Savings Maintenance Savings Space Savings from Workhour Costs- Combined from Other Curr vs Prop from Other Curr vs Prop from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS from Maintenance from Space Evaluation and Other Costs Total Annual Savings Total One-Time Costs ($31,003} ($18,023) from Space Evaluation and Other Costs Total First Year Savings $339,178 $278,941 Staffing Craft Position Loss from Staffing-Craft PCES/EAS Position Loss (2) 2 from Stafflng-PCESIEAS Service Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 0/N) 98.95% 97.13% from Service Performance & CSM First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day) 96.17% 95.42% from Service Performance & CSM First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day) 97.07% 94.77% from Service Performance & CSM Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level 89.58% 85.15% from Service Performance & CSM from Service Performance & CSM PIR Executive Summary

5 Calculation References Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR Function 1 Workhour Costs $12,493,989 $12,409,719 $12,220,069 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs (less Maintenance & Transportation) $3,481,222 $3,481,222 $3,427,853 PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $1,654,009 $1,579,976 $1,544,202 Transportation Costs $727,263 $812,349 $1,065,445 Maintenance Costs $2,296,704 $2,358,047 $2,025,437 Space Savings $0 $0 $0 Total Annual Cost $20,653,187 $20,641,314 $20,283,006 Total One-Time Costs $0 $12,980 $31,003 Total First Year $20,653,187 $20,654,294 $20,314,009 Staffing Craft Position Total On-Rolls PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP!A~~roved) AMP Approved AMP Function 1 Workhour Savings $273,920 $189,651 $84,270 $53,369 $53,369 $0 Non~Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint/Trans) PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $109,807 $35,774 $74,033 Transportation Savings ($338, 182) ($253,095) ($85,086) Maintenance Savings $271,267 $332,610 ($61,343) Space Savings $0 $0 $0 Total Annual Savings $370,181 $358,308 $11,873 Total One-Time Costs ($31,003) ($18,023) ($12,980) Total First Year Savings $339,178 $340,285 ($1,107) Staffing Craft Position Loss PCES/EAS Position Loss (2) 2 (4) PIR Executive Summary

6 Summary Narrative Last Saved: May 2, 2013 Losing Facility Name and Type: Jamestown CSMPC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 584 Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Gaining Facility Name and Type: Fargo P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 565, 580,581 Background The Dakotas Performance Cluster, with assistance from the Western Area Office, has completed an Area Mail Processing (AMP) 6-month Post Implementation Review to measure the success of consolidation of mail processing operations from the Jamestown ND Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) to the Fargo ND Processing and Distribution Center (P&DC). The AMP was approved on Sept. 16, The approved AMP transferred the processing of all originating and destinating mail processing volumes for the 584 ZIP Code service areas to Fargo P&DC from Jamestown CSMPC. The transfer of volumes was completed on Dec I, 20 II. Jamestown CSMPC is a USPS-owned facility located approximately 98 miles from the GSAleased Fargo P&DC. There have been no changes to retail or BMEU operations as a result of the AMP implementation and Mailers are able to deposit their mail through the Jamestown PO BMEU as done before the AMP was implemented. A local Jamestown postmark is still available from the local office. Financial Summarv Financial savings identified during this first PIR study for this consolidation of originating and destinating operations are: Total Annual Savings $370,181 Total First Year Savings $ 339,I78 Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR Function 1 Workhour Costs $12,493,989 $12,409,719 $12,220,069 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs (less Maintenance & Transportation) $3,481,222 $3,481,222 $3,427,853 PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $1,654,009 $1,579,976 $1,544,202 Transportation Costs $727,263 $812,349 $1,065,445 Maintenance Costs $2,296,704 $2,358,047 $2,025,437 Space Savings $0 $0 $0 Total Annual Cost $20,653,187 $20,641,314 $20,283,006 Total One-Time Costs $0 ($12,980) ($31,003) Total First Year $20,653,187 $20,628,334 $20,252,003 The 6-month PIR identifies that this AMP is meeting the expectations of the approved AMP; however, a portion of these savings can be attributed to another concurrent initiative that are also reflected in the first PIR financials. PIR Summary Narrative

7 In accordance with the 2010 National Field Maintenance Restructure, work was realigned within Dakotas District so that positions now report to the Lead Plant finance number rather than the facility they are domiciled. There were a total of3 Area Maintenance positions that are not charged to the Fargo finance number that were part of the Pre-AMP (base) information. This administrative transfer of the Area Maintenance workload resulted in additional savings over the base period of$332,965. Adjusting for the above, the projected First Year Savings for the Jamestown AMP is $6,213, which is above the Approved AMP First Year cost of $1, Customer Service Considerations There were Nine OND service pair upgrades and 4 downgrades with the implementation of the AMP. National Distribution and Labeling List changes were submitted as appropriate for lists L002, L005 & L201 and published in PB on November 7, The Jamestown CSMPC EXFC First Class Mail Service performance scores from TTMS for the AMP impacted ZIP Codes in SCF 584 are: The Fargo P&DC EXFC First Class performance scores from TTMS for the AMP impacted ZIP Codes are: Initial indicators show significant improvement in all service categories to pre-amp scores. Staffing Impacts The approved Jamestown AMP proposal identified a net reduction of I craft position with Jamestown reducing 4 distribution clerk positions and Fargo adding 2 distribution and I maintenance position from the consolidation of originating and destinating operations. There was also a Joss of 1 management position in Jamestown. The 6-month PIR data ref1ects a net craft complement decrease of I 1 positions (4 in Jamestown, 7 in Fargo), this is mainly due to the fluctuation in Fargo complement due to Joss ofpse and casual employees. Fargo is still in the process of adding the maintenance employee approved in the AMP. Jamestown has reduced the EAS positions projected, with Fargo EAS staff increasing by three from the Pre-AMP levels due to filling of their vacant but authorized EAS position. PIR Summary Narrative

8 1 Craft= FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals The staffing impacts on management-to-craft ratios are summarized in the table below: 1 Craft= FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals 2 Craft= F1 + F4 at losing; F1 only at Gaining All affected employees that were reassigned to other Postal facilities were subject to processes outlined in the National Labor Agreements. Pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN), the USPS is complying with the National Labor Agreements in reassigning employees. Transportation Changes All transportation supporting both Fargo and Jamestown is exclusively HCR with no PVS service. The approved Jamestown AMP projected annual transportation expense of $85,086 with the 6-month PIR data projecting an annual expense of $2 I 2,898 due to changes made both prior to and post AMP implementation. Specific changes to HCR transportation identified in the original AMP include: HCR 584 I I mileage was projected as to be higher for a frequency of 6 days per week rather than 5 due to the AMP. With further review, this route was eliminated and the trip was added to HCR HCR 58440, HCR and HCR were originally projected with higher mileage due to an added stop in Valley City ND to drop off collection volume for HCR (getting it to Fargo earlier). The mileage turned out to be slightly more than projected but at a lower negotiated rate per mile. PIR Summary Narrative

9 HCR was originally projected with higher mileage in order to bring DPS to the city of Jamestown. That mileage was instead added to HCR 584A 7 (584xx in approved AMP), which picks up the DPS in Valley City and brings it to Jamestown. There was also a change in the line oftravel and stops on HCR 584A7. HCR was adjusted for the additional layover identified in AMP; however, it was determined in Post-Implementation review that it no longer required to go all the way to Bismarck which resulted in a mileage reduction. HCR 580xx in approved AMP was originally planned as a new route for Jamestown DPS; however, instead these volumes are now dispatched on to Valley City to connect with 584A 7 to Jamestown. These additions were necessary to ensure operating plan performance for timely processing of originating and destinating volumes. Eguiument Relocation and One-Time costs Three CSBCS were removed from Jamestown CSMPC and one additional DBCS was relocated to Fargo P&DC. Fargo is space deficient and a wall was removed from the basement of their GSA owned building to make room for the additional DBCS. This resulted in one-time costs of $18,815 -higher than the $12,980 initial projection in the AMP package. There was also the expense of$12, 188 in maintenance hours to move, assemble and prepare the DBCS for operations. The AMP proposed no change in maintenance costs as a result of the AMP, with the PIR reflecting a savings of$271,267. This savings is not the result of the AMP but of the 2010 National Field Maintenance Restructure that realigned positions reporting to the Lead Plant finance number rather than the facility they are domiciled as identified in the Financial Summary. This administrative transfer of the Area Maintenance workload resulted in additional savings over the base period of $332,965. These savings were offset by the additional work hours to provide coverage for the DBCS deployed to Fargo which were contained in another AMP package that was subsequently not approved. PIR Summary Narrative

10 Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: May 2, 2013 Losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC District:..::D..::a;.;.;k;.:;.o.;;.;ta..::s PIRType: 1st PIR Implementation Date: 01/01/12 After AMP Gaining Facility: -::F:-a":"rg._o:-P_&_D_F District:..::D..::a;.;.;k;.:;.o.;;.;ta;,.;;s;... _ (15) Notes: Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measuremenl Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in CEM. Satisfaction (Overall Experience) ~-8"9.9~;--~J~atisfa<~;ion with Receiving (Experience with receiving) Satisfac:tion with Sending (Experience with sending) ~..-_...:::..:..:: _..;:.;::.;.;.;:..:.;:._-~.._...::.::.:..:;.:...:..:::.._.J- "-'' to recommend the USPS Satisfac:tion with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently visited PO) Satisfac:tion with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact wil PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

I Combined Facilities I Type of Distribution Consolidated: Olig & Oest Workhour Costs Combined Facilities " Last Saved: May 2, 2013.

11 I Combined Facilities I Type of Distribution Consolidated: Olig & Oest Workhour Costs Combined Facilities " Last Saved: May 2, Function 1 Function 4 l-nia /G$ L-N/AIG$ L$37.6! G-NfA 14,. L-N/A 10$40.71 L..NIA!G$43.03 L-N/A/G$ l$44.8 IG-NIA PIR Workhour Costs ~Combined Facilities

12 PIR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

14 (V)NOTES: PIR Workhour Costs ~ Combined Facilities

16 Losing Facility: JamestoiNI'l CSMPC Workhour Costs -Losing Facility Last Saved: May 2, 2013 PIR Type : ~~~:Oo>m;;;,-;s;;n,;;:;;fu;;;t,;;R;S, Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: ~ to Ju~ PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

17 PIR Workhour Costs ~ Losing

18 PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

19 PIR Workhour Costs w Losing

20 PIR Workhour Costs~ Losing

21 Gaining Facility:_:_f_:::a,_,rgc::o.:.P.::&c:D::_F Workhour Costs -Gaining Facility Last Saved: May 2, 2013 PIR Type : ~f.ll:~c-~o:::==;;u;;;;re.toff';;;; Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: ~-~~~ to Jun PIR Workhour Costs- Gaining

22 PIR Workhour Costs Gaining:

23 PiR Workhour Costs ~ Gaining

24 PIR Workhour Costs -Gaining

25 (27)NOTES: PIR Workhour Costs- Gaining

26 I Other Workhour Move Analysis I PIR Other Workhour Costs

28 PIR Other Workhour Costs

29 PIR Other Wori<hour Costs

30 PI R Other Workhour Costs

31 I Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs. --- I PIR Other Workhour Costs

~ ~2.68" -100.00-12.46.-6.640 67.12" ~ -5.

32 ~ ~2.68" " ~ -5.75% Operation Number PIR Other Wori<hour Costs

Staffing - Craft Last Saved: May 2, 2013 PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 07/02/12 Craft Positions Craft Positions r------------,-----------1, (23), (24), I

33 Staffing - Craft Last Saved: May 2, 2013 PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 07/02/12 Craft Positions Craft Positions r , , (23), (24), I 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed I,,, Total Craft Position Loss:l 11 I 10 I I I I #(p:;;:r;~~e-;:;;; ~rrt"~;rwa~k;"it;;e;~iivts~;;;"'m:;;y) PIR Staffing -Craft

34 Staffing- PCES/EAS Last Saved: May 2, 2013 PIR Type: 1st PIR Losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC Data Extraction Date: 712/2012 Finance#..:3.;..74.;..68:.;:.;;..8 PCES/EAS Positions On-Rolls (6) (7) Position Title PIR Staffing PCES/EAS

35 Gaining Facility:.:.F.:::a::..;rg~~:o::...:..,P:;:;&;::D::,F= Data Extraction Date: 7/2/2012 Finance #.:3.:.7.:.30;:.;5:.;6:... _ r~-' ~------~ ~ ,! Total PCES/EAS, ( 37 ), ( 38 ),! Position Loss! -2! 2! ' L L ' (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary) PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS

36 Losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC Finance Number:..:3..:..7...:.46.:.:8:..:8= Transportation - PVS Last Saved: May 2, 2013 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jan to- Jun Gaining Facility: -;F;-:;a:::;rg~o;:.:::-P.:.:&.:.:D.:..F Finance Number: ~~~ (8) PIR (10) Variance 1st I Variance 1 PIR vs Pre PIR vs (11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: ($252) (This number added to the Executive Summary (12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: ($252) (This number added to the Executive Summary) (13) Notes= PIR Transportation- PVS

37 Transportation - HCR Last Saved: May 2, 2013 losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC PIR Type: 1st PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Data of HCR Data File: 07/01/12 CT for Outbound Dock: (1) (4) (7) Route# 1st PIR 1st PIR Annual Cost 1st PIR PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

38 Change Analysis (11) (12) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

39 Transportation - HCR Last Saved: May 2, 2013 Gaining Facility: Fargo P&DF --~ Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest CET for Inbound Dock: Date of HCR Data File: 07/01/12 CET for Cancellations: PIR Type: Orig & Dest CETforOGP: CT for Outbound Dock: *-~ " ~ PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

Change Analysis (11) (12) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed Losing Gaining Summary HCR Losing & Gaining (13) 1 (14) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP $212,152 $126.282 1st PIR vs Proposed $150.

40 Change Analysis (11) (12) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed Losing Gaining Summary HCR Losing & Gaining (13) 1 (14) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP $212,152 $ st PIR vs Proposed $ $102,978 (13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities) $338,434 (14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities) :.?. Total Transportatio~ $253,347. > > (16) (15) 1st PIR vs Pre 1st PIR vs Proposed AMP HCR $ PVS {$252) (15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR): $338,182 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary) $ \$252) (16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary) $253,095 PIR Transportation HCR Gaining

Data Extraction Date: ----- MPE Inventory Last Saved: May 2, 2013 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 -to- Jun-30-2012 Losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC Gaining

41 Data Extraction Date: MPE Inventory Last Saved: May 2, 2013 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jan to- Jun Losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC Gaining Facility:..;.F..;;;a::...rgz.::o:..:P...:&::.:D::..:F Costs Relocation Costs Variance in Costs 0 $0 $0 $() $4,208 (10) Notes: Carried to Space Evaluation and PIR MPE Inventory

42 r:-:::::::- Losing Facility: Workhour Activity Mail Processing 1 Lu'-' ~o Equipment ILDC 37 Jamestown CSMPC rn J (3) Maintenance Last Saved May 2, 2013 (4) (5) Variance 1st Variance 1st Proposed 1st PIR PIR to Pre PIRto Costs Costs AMP Proposed 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 ILDC ,234 $ 262 (45,972) $ (45,972) ILoc ,942 $ 94,570 37,627 $ 37,627 lli!iildc I 0 $ 0 () $ -- {81:) 812 $ 0 (812) $ ,988 $ 94,832 {9,156) $ {9,156) II PIR Type :...:.1:::.;st:...:P...:.I:...:R Date Range of Data: Jan : Jun Gaining Facility: Fargo P&DF --~ !l~inilli~~~j5j;9itj,0} (7) (8) (9) Variance 1st Workhour Activity Proposed 1st PIR PIR to Pre Costs Costs AMP :!lll~t Mail ~;;~~nn; $~: ]Ji~~~!ili $ ~cxr" i ;,:x,.::, 1,395,906 $ 1,530, ,114 $ Building Equipment $ ilil!!1-im11, $ 332,065 $ 0 {33l,9&5) $ ~UIIUIII~ ~C'I YI\;C'~ 0 $ 0 li 0 $ 78,739 $ 78,339 (400) $ 50,763 $ 14,625 \%,137) $ 1,858,373 $ 1,622,985,~, (235,383) $ (10) Variance 1st PIR to Pre Proposed (332,965) 0 {400) ( ) (23S,3S!t) 39, ,050 Grand Total (11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP -Maintenance Savings: (12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:,267),267) (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary) (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary) (13) "Data in P!R columns is annualized for First PIR PIR Maintenance

43 Distribution Changes Last Saved: May Losing Facility : Jamestown CSMPC PIR Type: 1st PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jan to-- Jun (1) Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP. DMM L001 DMM L011 Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions. < 2 l PB /17/11 X DMM L002 X DMM L003 DMM L004 DMM L201 DMM L601 DMM L602 Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP? < 3 l YES X DMM L005 DMM L006 DMM L007 DMM L008 DMM L009 DMM L010 DMM L603 DMM L604 DMM L605 DMM L606 DMM L607 DMM L801 (4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS Total No-Show Late Arrival Open Facility Name Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count % May '12 Losing Facility 584 JAMESTOWN N/A June '12 Losing Facility 584 JAMESTOWN N/A May '12 Gaining Facility 580 FARGO % % % June '12 Gaining Facility 580 FARGO % % % - ' Closed Count % % % Unschd I Count 0 0 (5) Notes: Vast majority of mail is dropped at NASS code 581AX- the Fargo ASF Annex PIR Distribution Changes

44 Customer Service Issues Last Saved: May 2, 2013 Losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC 5-Digit ZIP Code: Data Extraction Date:..:Oc:c7,:,/1"'6'""t1"'"2 1. Collection Points Number picked up before 1 p.m. Number picked up between 1-5 p.m. Number picked up after 5 p.m. Total Number of Collection Points 2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"? I o I 3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? I o J 4. Delivery Performance Report % Carriers returning before 5 p.m. 5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours 7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes 8. Notes: Gaining Facility: _F_a_,rg,_o_P_&_D_F 9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? [ Fargo NO 581 J PIR Customer Service Issues

45 Losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC 1. Affected Facility Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved: May 2, 2013.' Date: 2. One-Time Costs 3. Savings Information Enter any one-time costs: $;,;5;.:.,000='-- $18,815 $13,815 (These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.) Space Savings ($):...;$:.;0 $0 $0 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summaty) 4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain. Some s~ace was gained in Jamestown due to removal of three CSBCS's, this space is used for hashing to STAR Rtes as they remain a hub. 5. Notes: WFSO site prep $18, (Downes) Employee Relocation Costs $0 $0 $0 Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs $7,980 $12,188 $4,208 (from MPE lnventoty) Facility Costs $5,000 $18,815 $13,815 (from above) Total One-Time Costs $12,980 $31,003 $18,023 PIR costs carried forward to Executive Summary) Losing Facility: Jamestown CSMPC Pre-AMP: FY 2011 Range of Report PIR: FY 2012 YTD Gaining Facility:.c..F..;:a;..;rgz.;:o:..;P...;&::;D::.F:.., _ (5) 1st PIR Cost per 1,000 Images PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

October 23, Certified Mail Tracking Number:

October 23, Certified Mail Tracking Number: October 23, 2014 Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128 Certified Mail Tracking Number: 7013 3020 0002 3616 9500 Dear Mark: As