FINANCING PROPOSAL FOR THE NATIONAL ADDRESSING AND POSTCODE PROJECT- NATIONAL ROLLOUT PHASE

Transcription

1 FINANCING PROPOSAL FOR THE NATIONAL ADDRESSING AND POSTCODE PROJECT- NATIONAL ROLLOUT PHASE Submitted by Zambia Information and Communications Technology Authority Plot No. 4909, Corner Independence and United Nations Avenue P.O. Box 36871, Lusaka Tel: or Fax: June, 2015

2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... II 1.0. DESCRIPTION OF THE NATIONAL ADDRESSING AND POSTCODE PROJECT RATIONALE FOR THE NATIONAL ADDRESSING AND POSTCODE PROJECT ANTICIPATED BENEFITS OF THE NATIONAL ADDRESSING AND POSTCODE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL ADDRESSING AND POSTCODE PROJECT INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS STRATEGIC PILLARS AND ASSOCIATED CONSIDERATIONS DURING IMPLEMENTATION RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY RESOURCE REQUIREMENT EVALUATION MECHANISM APPENDIX 1- COST ESTIMATES FOR NATIONWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT PER DISTRICT... 14

3 Executive Summary The Government of the Republic of Zambia through the Zambia Information and Communications Technology Authority (ZICTA) is in the process of developing a national addressing and postcode system for Zambia. Specifically, the project primarily seeks to develop addressing infrastructure across the country with a corresponding national address database. The addressing infrastructure includes but is not limited to mounted street and area names as well as mounted numbers on all properties in the country. On the other hand, the national address database will provide details on the physical location of all properties in the country. In 2011, ZICTA financed a feasibility study for the project which was undertaken in conjunction with the Universal Postal Union. Furthermore, the Authority exclusively financed the pilot phase of the project which was recently concluded in The total cost of the preliminary phase of the project was about ZMW 6 million. The subsequent stage of the project will be the national rollout phase that has been segmented into five sub-phases to be completed over a five year period ( ). The National rollout phase of the project is expected to have a huge resource requirement on account of the expanse coverage and volume of inputs. It is for this reason that the government through ZICTA would like to extend an invitation to cooperating partners, development finance institutions and any interest groups to participate in the project. The total cost of the national rollout phase of the project is estimated at ZMW 199 million or approximately US$30 million. The Government of the Republic of Zambia has already committed to meeting about 10 percent of this cost with the balance anticipated to be mobilized through cooperating partners, development finance institutions or any other interest groups. Once fully implemented, the national addressing and postcode system is expected to generate social and economic benefits that are far reaching beyond the growth of the postal and courier services sector. Notably, the project is expected to among other things lead to: Improved service delivery for emergency services such as fire fighters, ambulances and the police; employment and wealth creation; increased investment in projects that rely on postal and courier services; efficiency gains in the delivery of goods and services by postal and courier service providers; and contribute to the improvement of access to financial services such as access to credit and hire Page ii

4 purchase. Furthermore, the project is expected to contribute to the enhancement of efficiency in collecting taxes and levies associated with property by both the local authority and the central government. Overall, this initiative is expected to translate into an improvement in the ease of doing business in the country. Page iii

5 1.0. Description of the National Addressing and Postcode Project The Government of the Republic of Zambia through the Zambia Information and Communications Technology Authority (ZICTA) is in the process of developing and subsequently implementing a comprehensive national addressing and postcode system. This development dubbed the National Addressing and Postcode Project is envisaged to constitute the following components: a) Design, development and rollout of appropriate physical address infrastructure- property numbering, street and area name signage - throughout the country; b) Design and development of a suitable postcode system for the country; c) Design, development and implementation of a national addressing standard that conforms to international best practice; d) Design and development of a national address database for the storage and management of address information; e) Design and development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) that will be integrated with the national address database; and f) National awareness campaign to the public on the benefits of the national addressing and postcode system as well as investment promotion activities for the private sector. The project which was initiated in 2012 is expected to have a national coverage and implemented over the next five years ( ). The implementation of the project has been segmented into two key phases-pilot phase and a national rollout phase. The pilot phase which provided useful insights on the practicality of implementing the project was concluded in 2014 at a cost of about ZMW 6 million. Prior to the pilot phase of the project, ZICTA in conjunction with the Universal Postal Union undertook feasibility studies for the project in Zambia. All the activities preceding the national rollout phase were exclusively financed by ZICTA. The national rollout phase of the project will be segmented into five (5) implementation sub phases covering the entire country. This phase of the project is expected to have huge resource implications on account of the expanse coverage and volume of inputs. Page 1

6 In view of the foregoing, the Government of the Republic of Zambia, through ZICTA intends to invite cooperating partners and development finance institutions to participate in the financial and technical implementation of the national rollout phase of the project. The national rollout phase is scheduled to commence in 2015 with funds amounting ZMW5 million already provided by the government. Selected pictures of Addressing Infrastructure from the pilot phase of the project Page 2

7 2.0. Rationale for the National Addressing and Postcode Project Addresses are a means of uniquely identifying a location. Specifically, an address provides the particulars of the place where an individual lives or where an organisation is situated. In the absence of addresses, it is almost impractical to access emergency services such as ambulance services, fire fighter services or police response services. A verifiable physical address is also a prerequisite to accessing some financial services such as opening a bank account or acquiring goods on hire purchase. Furthermore, addresses are an indispensable part of the postal and courier services supply chain. They facilitate the efficient delivery of letters and parcels to intended recipients. Therefore, Addresses are essential for economic and social development as they allow people to be connected to the formal economy thereby being able to have access to a host of commercial and social products and services. In this sense, addresses should in fact be considered as basic public infrastructure just as roads or railways. However, only a small proportion of the population in Zambia has an address. The country mainly relies on the Post Office Box (P.O. Box) addressing system. However, this system is not only insufficient for the growing population but is also not likely to translate into the numerous benefits associated with a physical address. Consequently, there is an urgent need for an inclusive and comprehensive addressing system in Zambia. Arguably, the absence of a good addressing and postcode system in Zambia has constricted investment and growth in the postal and courier services sector. ZICTA through the Postal Services Act Number 22 of 2009 has the mandate to ensure that the entire population has access to a wide range of postal and courier services that are affordable and of an acceptable quality. However, the country is still faced with the basic challenge of limited access on account of an inadequate addressing system. The Postal Services Act Number 22 of 2009 further provides the Authority with the mandate to stimulate and foster growth and investment in the postal sector. Nevertheless, an eminent barrier to new entrants on the market and further investment by the existing operators is the inadequate addressing infrastructure in the country. Page 3

8 It is against this background that the government through ZICTA embarked on the National Addressing and Postcode project. The anticipated benefits of this project have a wider reach beyond the growth of the postal sector which include but are not limited to: improved service delivery for emergency services such as fire fighters, ambulances and the police; employment and wealth creation; increased investment in projects that rely on postal and courier services; efficiency gains in the delivery of goods and services by postal and courier service providers; and a contribution to the improvement of access to financial services Anticipated Benefits of the National Addressing and Postcode Project A sound national addressing and postcode system is likely to deliver a wide spectrum of benefits to the postal and courier services sector as well as other spheres of the economy. It is also likely to have some contribution on social welfare improvement in the country Benefits to the Postal and Courier Services Sector I. Improved quality of service and delivery success (reduction in costly undeliverable mail) due to increased address accuracy; II. III. IV. Increased scope of the market size; Potential for development of new, untapped revenue streams and mail flows such as direct mail marketing, statement mail, utility bill delivery, logistics and parcel business among others; Potential for new revenue from e-commerce and in particular, e-fulfillment services (where the postal operator delivers goods purchased online to individual households); and V. Potential for increased efficiency from automated mail processing Benefits beyond the Postal and Courier Services Sector I. The integration of a greater proportion of the population into the formal economy will among other benefits increase the market for specific services which require proof of identity and residence such as banking services, access to credit and hire purchase transactions among others; Page 4

9 II. III. IV. The advertising industry can benefit from the introduction of a previously under utilised channel Direct Mail Marketing & Mail Order Business; E-commerce becomes a distinct possibility with such a system in place; Utility companies such as water and electricity can better manage and maintain their networks and collect fees which could in turn improve their operational efficiency; V. Facilitate improvements in collecting taxes and levies related to properties by the Government and local authority VI. VII. VIII. Ease planning and deployment of social services such as electricity, water and sanitation services; For the public, the improved street naming, property numbering and area coding makes cities more user-friendly and helps people find their way around more easily; and The system facilitates the efficient delivery of emergency health, fire and police services to the correct address within the shortest possible time. Selected Emergency services that can be facilitated by a National Addressing system 4.0. Implementation of the National Addressing and Postcode Project 4.1. Institutional Arrangements The implementation of the National Addressing and Postcode Project will involve the participation of various stakeholders who include but are not limited to: ZICTA; Infrastructure Page 5

10 Suppliers; Local Authorities; Installation teams; Communities; and local businesses. The linkage between these players and their strategic roles are highlighted in figure 1 below: Figure 1: Participation of Various Stakeholders in the National Addressing and Postcode Project ZICTA Project Management Supplier Infrastructure Supplier Local Authorities Maping and Supervision ZICTA Secretariat Community SMES/ Installation Teams Installation Field Data Collectors Data Collection/Verification ZICTA will be responsible for the overall management and implementation of the project during the national rollout phase. Its responsibility will also involve the efficient management and deployment resources towards the project. The Local Authorities will also be an important partner in the project. They will be responsible for the provision of initial mapping resources and supervision of works once contracts have been awarded to the installation teams. The local authorities also have the legal mandate of naming streets or designated areas in the country. A local supplier will be identified through a competitive bidding process that will also act as the sole manufacturer and supplier of addressing infrastructure in the national rollout phase. This will be done so as to ensure standardization in the quality of infrastructure being installed. At the Page 6

11 same time, the company will act as a wholesaler to the community based installation teams so as to reduce on the overall cost of the project. A project secretariat, based at ZICTA, has been appointed to coordinate the implementation of the project. The secretariat will provide an operational link among the identified stakeholders. The Secretariat will also be responsible for managing and updating the National Address database that was developed during the pilot phase of the project. The secretariat will also be responsible for the overall monitoring and evaluation of the project. ZICTA will handle all procurement arrangements needed during the project including the award and supervision of contracts. However, prospective financiers of the project are free to prescribe their own procurement or administrative guidelines for any funds that they may wish to commit to the project Strategic Pillars and Associated Considerations during Implementation Two strategic pillars will be taken into consideration during the national rollout phase of the project. The first pillar will focus on the deployment of addressing infrastructure and all associated processes needed for the creation of addresses. The second pillar will concentrate on the management of the address data emanating from the physical addresses that would have been created. The key considerations under each strategic pillar are summarized in figure 2 below: Figure 2: Strategic Pillars and Key Considerations during the National Rollout Phase Cost minimisation Physical Infrastructure Deployment Operational efficiency and quality control Local empowerment Address Data Management Comprehensive coverage Data Quality Page 7

12 Physical Infrastructure Deployment Under this strategic pillar, the project will seek to incur the least cost while adhering to high quality and standards. Particularly, the cost of the house numbers and the steel poles will be reduced on account of a sole supplier being sourced on negotiated price terms. This initiative is also expected to guarantee the same level of quality across all project areas. Furthermore, the project is expected to generate some benefits to local communities and small businesses. Particularly, youths from the local communities are likely to be engaged by the local businesses that will be hired to install the physical infrastructure Address Data Management The management of address data will remain a key component throughout the project. In order to streamline the collection, verification and uploading of data into the national address database, data collection will be conducted simultaneously with the installation of house numbers. As a measure for enhancing the quality of data collected, training in the collection and management of spatial data will also be conducted by the project secretariat Risk Management Strategy Effort was also taken during the pilot phase of the project to identify risks associated with the implementation of the project and some countervailing measures to mitigate these risks were identified (See table1). The risk assessment process is expected to continue throughout the implementation of the project. This will hedge against any likely attributes of project failure as well as anticipate any challenges for the successful completion of the project. Table 1: Identified Risks and Mitigation Measures during the Implementation of the Project Risk Project Size Excessive Man-hours for key project participants Risk Level L/M/H H: In excess of normal working hours Likelihood Event of Mitigation Strategy Certainty Project participation not restricted to committee members but extended to their respective organisations that may provide alternative representatives when required. Page 8

13 Unmanageable team size at Peak H: Includes field staff and vendors of address infrastructure. Certainty Comprehensive communications plan, frequent meetings, tight project management oversight Project Definition Project Scope Creep Project Deliverables unclear Vendor Project Deliverables L: Scope clearly defined, subject to revision Unlikely Scope initially defined in project plan, to be reviewed monthly to prevent undetected scope creep L: Well defined Unlikely Included in project plan, subject to amendment M: Generally defined Somewhat likely Included in project plan, subject to amendment Cost Estimates Unrealistic M: Largely estimated Likely Included in project budgets, subject to amendment as actual costs become apparent and new details regarding project scope are revealed Timeline Unrealistic Estimates Project Leadership Steering Committee nonexistence Absence of Commitment Level/Attitude of Project Sponsor Absence of Commitment Level/Attitude of Committee members Project Staffing Project Team Availability Physical Location of Team prevents effective management M: Timeline assumes no derailment L: Ministry aware of project and enthusiastic L: Understands value & supports project L: Understands value & supports project M: Distributed team makes availability questionable M: Team will be dispersed among several sites Somewhat likely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Timeline reviewed monthly by Project Leadership & Secretariat to prevent undetected timeline departures ZICTA Management to engage Parent Ministry to initiate formation of Policy-level Steering Committee led by Minister Frequently seek feedback to ensure continued support Frequently seek feedback to ensure continued support Continuous review of project momentum by Secretariat to identify any impacts caused by unavailability. If necessary, propose increased commitment by participants to full time status Use of mobile phones, two-way radios, and strict adherence to Communication Strategy Poor working relationship among Project team members M: Multi-stakeholder committee that has not worked together before Somewhat likely Communication Plan enhances team cohesion Project Management Page 9

14 Procurement process for key project elements may be excessively long Project Management Procedures unclear H: Procurement Methodology must conform to public procurement procedures Likely Timely preparation of TORs and use of requests for Expressions of Interest as a means of reducing vendor selection time. L: Well-defined Unlikely Included in project plan, subject to amendment Vendor Management Poor Functional Match of outsourced Project elements to Initial System Requirements M: Rework required Somewhat likely Vendor selection to be based, in part, on how well the proposed application matches defined functional specifications Resource Requirement The total cost of the project is estimated at ZMW 199,000,000 (One Hundred and Ninety Nine Million Kwacha) or approximately US$30 million. The Government through ZICTA has already pledged about 10 percent of the total cost of the project while the balance is anticipated to be financed by cooperating partners, development finance institutions or any other interest groups. Table 2: Project Financing Data [ ] Loan [ ] Credit [X] Grant [ ] Guarantee [ ] Other: Total Financing (US$30million.) (Thirty Million United States Dollars) Proposed Financing Plan: Recipient: Government of the Republic of Zambia Lusaka Responsible Agency: ZICTA Project implementation period: Start: July 1, December 31, 2019 Page 10

15 The project is planned to be implemented over a five year period ( ) segmented into five sub phases. The proposed implementation plan is based on a feasibility assessment conducted by ZICTA aimed at ascertaining the accuracy of quantity and cost projections. The feasibility assessment also evaluated the level of preparedness of the various provinces for the rollout of the addressing infrastructure (see figure 3).This was based on a number of parameters that included spatial and non-spatial address data including maps, street indices, layout plans, existing naming and numbering policies and neighbourhood typology among others. Wherever possible, information about the capability of the local industry to produce and install required signage was also collected. Figure 3 : Implementation Plan of the National Rollout Phase On the basis of the intended implementation plan, the summarized resource requirement schedule below is proposed to cover the five year lifecycle of the project: Page 11

16 Table 3: Summary of Estimates for Resource Requirement Expenditure (ZMW) Phase 1 (2015) Phase 2 (2016) Phase 3 (2017) Phase 4 (2018) Phase 5 (2019) Total Addressing 1 Standard Feasibility Assessment and project planning 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, ,000 Mapping & GIS support 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30, ,000 Data collection 3 50, ,000 Data Management 4 600, , , , ,000 3,000,000 Physical Infrastructure 5 60,734,268 27,949,502 28,653,351 38,945,718 27,411, ,693,900 Post Code Development 6 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 80, ,000 Public Awareness 900, , , , ,000 3,000,000 Capital + Operational 7 900, , , , ,000 3,000,000 Total Budget Estimate 63,294,268 29,859,502 30,563,351 40,555,718 29,071, ,343,900 A detailed breakdown of the cost of implementing the project disaggregated to the district level is provided in Annex 1. Cooperating partners and Development finance institutions are invited to participate in the implementation of any component of the project. 1 ZMW34,750 expenditure incurred during the development of addressing standard prior to updating/creating of spatial data for use in the addressing system 3 public awareness, field data collection, verification & validation, GPS data capture 4 database development, data entry, dissemination, integration & interoperability 5 street name signage and house numbers 6 development and dissemination of postcode directories 7 Project Secretariat Capital and Operational Costs Page 12

17 6.0. Evaluation Mechanism The Monitoring and Evaluation function on the project will be undertaken by the project secretariat at ZICTA. This will particularly involve tracking the performance of the project against the set targets in the project implementation plan. Emphasis will be on timeliness of delivery, cost management and adherence to quality and standards. Monitoring reports are expected to be prepared every quarter and shared with all the financiers of the project. An evaluation exercise is also expected to be undertaken at the end of each phase of the project. It is recommended that the financing of subsequent phases of the project should be tied to the evaluation reports of the preceding phases. Cooperating partners and development finance institutions are also free to recommend their own monitoring and evaluation reporting tools on the project. Page 13

18 Appendix 1- Cost Estimates for Nationwide Infrastructure Deployment per District 1.0 Key Assumptions & Focus Areas This appendix is based on the assumption that the full implementation process will be completed over a period of five (5) years and builds on the lessons learnt from the Pilot Phase in determining the national implementation approach. The document also assumes that the use of a local manufacturer and wholesaler of addressing infrastructure will reduce the unit cost per item by at least 50% from current levels. The focus of the appendix is to attempt to accurately forecast the costs of infrastructure deployment on a national scale by determining the quantities and costs of house numbers and street name signage to be deployed at district and provincial level. 2.0 QUANTITIY & COST ESTIMATES FOR STREET SIGNAGE In the absence of detailed mapping resources including street layout maps for each and every district, an attempt at estimating the number of signs to be deployed on a countrywide scale is particularly challenging. Despite this challenge, however, a reasonable correlation between the population density (which is readily available from the 2010 Census Report) and the average number of streets in a given area has been helpful in arriving at such an estimate. Furthermore, the number of street intersections was estimated to be 4 times the number of streets, with each intersection requiring at least 2 signs. The detailed forecasts for each province are outlined in the tables below: Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs LUSAKA PROVINCE Km Cost K Lusaka 4,853 3,640 14,560 29, ,560,000 Chongwe ,000 Kafue ,000 Luangwa ,000 TOTAL 4,906 3,680 14,720 29,440 N/A 14,720,000 Page 14

19 COPPERBELT Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs PROVINCE Km Cost K Chililabombwe ,000 Chingola ,000 Kalulushi ,000 Kitwe ,000 4, ,000,000 Luanshya , ,000 Lufwanyama ,000 Masaiti ,000 Mpongwe ,000 Mufulira ,000 Ndola ,228 2, ,228,000 TOTAL 1,761 1,321 5,286 10,572 N/A 5,286,000 Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs CENTRAL PROVINCE Km Cost K Chibombo ,000 Kabwe ,000 Kapiri Mposhi ,000 Mkushi ,000 Mumbwa ,000 Serenje ,000 TOTAL ,160 N/A 580,000 NORTHWESTERN Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs PROVINCE Km Cost K Chavuma ,000 Ikelenge ,000 Kabompo ,000 Kasempa ,000 Mufumbwe ,000 Mwinilunga ,000 Solwezi ,000 Zambezi ,000 TOTAL N/A 168,000 Page 15

20 Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs WESTERN PROVINCE Km Cost K Kalabo ,000 Kaoma ,000 Lukulu ,000 Mongu ,000 Senanga ,000 Sesheke ,000 Shang'ombo ,000 TOTAL N/A 168,000 Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs SOUTHERN PROVINCE Km Cost K Choma ,000 Gweembe ,000 Itezhi-Tezhi ,000 Kalomo ,000 Kazungula ,000 Livingstone , ,000 Mazabuka ,000 Monze ,000 Namwala ,000 Siavonga ,000 Sinazongwe ,000 TOTAL ,266 2,532 N/A 1,266,000 Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs NORTHERN PROVINCE Km Cost K Chilubi ,000 Kaputa ,000 Kasama ,000 Luwingu ,000 Mbala ,000 Mporokoso ,000 Page 16

21 Mpulungu ,000 Mungwi ,000 TOTAL N/A 364,000 Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs LUAPULA PROVINCE Km Cost K Chienge ,000 Kawambwa ,000 Mansa ,000 Milenge ,000 Mwense ,000 Nchelenge ,000 Samfya ,000 TOTAL , ,000 Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs MUCHINGA PROVINCE Km Cost K Chama ,000 Chinsali ,000 Isoka ,000 Mafinga ,000 Mpika ,000 Nakonde ,000 TOTAL N/A 240,000 Persons/ Sq Unit Total Cost Streets Intersections Signs EASTERN PROVINCE Km Cost K Chadiza ,000 Chipata ,000 Katete ,000 Lundazi ,000 Mambwe ,000 Nyimba ,000 Petauke ,000 TOTAL ,512 N/A 756, QUANTITY& COST ESTIMATES FOR HOUSE NUMBERS Page 17

22 Although there was a strong temptation to base the quantity of house number plaques on known statistics pertaining to the number of households per district, it must be mentioned that such an estimate would grossly overstate the requirements. A more reasonable estimate can instead be derived from the number of planned cadaster/plots in each district. Based on available data form selected districts, the number of planned plots was estimated to be 45% of the number of households in each district as outlined in the tables below: House Households LUSAKA PROVINCE Numbers Unit Cost K Total Cost K Lusaka 358, , ,801,413 Chongwe 36,319 16, ,206,379 Kafue 44,556 20, ,706,777 Luangwa 4,672 2, ,824 TOTAL 444, ,988 N/A 26,998,394 COPPERBELT House Households PROVINCE Numbers Unit Cost K Total Cost K Chililabombwe 17,326 7, ,052,555 Chingola 39,657 17, ,409,163 Kalulushi 19,203 8, ,166,582 Kitwe 96,666 43, ,872,460 Luanshya 29,043 13, ,764,362 Lufwanyama 15,597 7, ,518 Masaiti 20,511 9, ,246,043 Mpongwe 17,350 7, ,054,013 Mufulira 30,065 13, ,826,449 Ndola 85,707 38, ,206,700 TOTAL 371, ,006 N/A 22,545,844 House Households CENTRAL PROVINCE Numbers Unit Cost K Total Cost K Chibombo 53,179 23, ,230,624 Kabwe 39,862 17, ,421,617 Page 18

23 Kapiri Mposhi 45,977 20, ,793,103 Mkushi 28,389 12, ,724,632 Mumbwa 39,142 17, ,377,877 Serenje 29,011 13, ,762,418 TOTAL 235, ,002 N/A 14,310,270 NORTHWESTERN House Total Cost Households Unit Cost K PROVINCE Numbers K Chavuma 6,670 3, ,203 Ikelenge 5,830 2, ,173 Kabompo 16,536 7, ,004,562 Kasempa 11,970 5, ,178 Mufumbwe 10,119 4, ,729 Mwinilunga 18,103 8, ,099,757 Solwezi 46,574 20, ,829,371 Zambezi 15,001 6, ,311 TOTAL 130,803 58,861 N/A 7,946,282 House Total Cost Households Unit Cost K WESTERN PROVINCE Numbers K Kalabo 26,480 11, ,608,660 Kaoma 36,068 16, ,191,131 Lukulu 16,676 7, ,013,067 Mongu 36,605 16, ,223,754 Senanga 25,162 11, ,528,592 Sesheke 20,159 9, ,224,659 Shang'ombo 19,029 8, ,156,012 TOTAL 180,179 81,081 N/A 10,945,874 House Total Cost Households Unit Cost K SOUTHERN PROVINCE Numbers K Choma 44,483 20, ,702,342 Gweembe 9,846 4, ,145 Itezhi-Tezhi 12,237 5, ,398 Kalomo 44,728 20, ,717,226 Kazungula 20,024 9, ,216,458 Livingstone 30,461 13, ,850,506 Mazabuka 43,411 19, ,637,218 Monze 32,849 14, ,995,577 Page 19

24 Namwala 16,662 7, ,012,217 Siavonga 17,757 7, ,078,738 Sinazongwe 19,721 8, ,198,051 TOTAL 292, ,481 N/A 17,749,874 House Households NORTHERN PROVINCE Numbers Unit Cost K Total Cost K Chilubi 16,716 7, ,015,497 Kaputa 23,740 10, ,442,205 Kasama 45,862 20, ,786,117 Luwingu 24,307 10, ,476,650 Mbala 40,096 18, ,435,832 Mporokoso 19,347 8, ,175,330 Mpulungu 19,650 8, ,193,738 Mungwi 30,843 13, ,873,712 TOTAL 220,561 99,252 N/A 13,399,081 LUAPULA PROVINCE Households House Numbers Unit Cost K Total Cost K Chienge 24,415 10, ,483,211 Kawambwa 25,196 11, ,530,657 Mansa 43,631 19, ,650,583 Milenge 7,594 3, ,336 Mwense 23,990 10, ,457,393 Nchelenge 30,157 13, ,832,038 Samfya 39,979 17, ,415,217 TOTAL 194,962 87,733 N/A 18,830,435 House Households MUCHINGA PROVINCE Numbers Unit Cost K Total Cost K Chama 19,420 8, ,179,765 Chinsali 28,668 12, ,741,581 Isoka 14,136 6, ,762 Mafinga 12,648 5, ,366 Mpika 39,956 17, ,427,327 Nakonde 23,955 10, ,455,266 TOTAL 138,783 62,452 N/A 8,431,067 Page 20

25 EASTERN PROVINCE Households House Numbers Unit Cost K Total Cost K Chadiza 19,822 8, ,204,187 Chipata 88,065 39, ,349,949 Katete 46,852 21, ,846,259 Lundazi 62,069 27, ,770,692 Mambwe 13,196 5, ,657 Nyimba 16,040 7, ,430 Petauke 59,154 26, ,593,606 TOTAL 305, ,339 N/A 18,540,779 Page 21

26 Page 22