AdaptIVe Current Status

Transcription

1 Felix Fahrenkrog Institut für Kraftfahrzeuge, RWTH Aachen University AdaptIVe Current Status Bordeaux 04 October 2015

2 // AdaptIVe structure 2 // 4 October 2015

3 // Projects facts Budget: EUR 25 Million European Commission: EUR 14,3 Million Duration: Coordinator: 42 months (January 2014 June 2017) Aria Etemad, Volkswagen Group Research 8 Countries: France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, United Kingdom 3 // 4 October 2015

4 // Timeline DEFINITION OF SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS DEFINITION OF SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE EQUIPMENT OF DEMONSTRATORS PROJECT RESULTS & IMPACT ANALYSIS Jan 14 June 14 Dec 14 June 15 Dec 15 June 16 Dec 16 Jun 17 DEFINITION OF USE CASES AND REQUIREMENTS PRODUCTION OF LEGAL GLOSSARY MIDTERM EVALUATION OF HVI DEFINITION OF LEGAL ASPECTS FUNCTIONAL DEMANDS ON HVI EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION 4 // 4 October 2015

5 // SP2 - Levels of driving automation acc. to SAE and VDA LDW FCW LKA ACC Parking Assistance Traffic Jam Chauffeur Parking Garage Pilot Robot Taxi level 0 level 1 level 2 level 3 level 4 level 5 No automation Assisted Partial automation Conditional automation High automation Full automation Driver in the loop No significant change with respect to existing driver assistance systems Deliverable D2.1 System Classification and Glossary available 5 // dd month yyyy event, place Driver out of the loop Not in accordance with regulatory law (Vienna Convention of 1968, national road law) Shared responsibility for control between driver and system need for action Source: SAE document J3016, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Automated Motor Vehicles, issued , see also 5 // 4 October 2015

6 // Vertical Subprojects & Demonstrators 5 Parking assistance, garage, special areas, multi-level garage, Stop & go // dd month yyyy event, place City cruise, City chauffeur, Supervised city control Enter & exit highway, following lane, lanechange, filter-in, overtaking, danger spot intervention, Stop & go Minimum Risk Manoeuvre 6 // 4 October 2015

7 // SP2 RESPONSE 4 AdaptIVe held a project workshop on legal aspects of automated driving on 17 September 2015 at Federation of French Car Manufacturers in Paris, France. Nearly 80 experts participated Topics: regulatory, technical approval and liability law data privacy questions insurance models Presentation are available: Deliverable 2.1 System Classification and Glossary 7 // 4 October 2015

8 // SP3 Human-Vehicle Interaction Working tasks Status Next steps Develop high level Use cases Delivered May be refined according to findings from our experiments State of Art of the Human Factors research. Collect research questions and carry out experiments. Create functional requirements and strategies for collaborative automation. Close dialogue with the other SPs in the project in order to identify relevant research topics. Provide input to the system architectures. Provided Seven experiments have been carried out. A first version Human Factors requirement catalogue has been created. Established structure and routines Dialogue established 8 // 4 October 2015 Continuously providing with new references, e.g. findings from our experiments and from technical progresses Meta-analysis of the findings. Identify relevant research topics and plan for the next round of experiments. The Human Factors requirement catalogue is continuously updated according to the findings from our experiments. Final catalogue will be delivered at the end of the project. Continue the dialogue and provide support regarding the human-vehicle integration in the demo-vehicles Provide support as the systems development is progressing.

9 // Automation in highway scenarios V2V communication protocols based on ITS G5 will be specified to enable dialog and negotiations before and during lane change or filter-in manoeuvres Driver take-over situations e.g. from partial automated to driver only or conditional automated to driver only demonstrated and evaluated Currently implementation of functions and build up demonstrator vehicles 10 // 4 October 2015

10 // Level 3 Highway Chauffeur Conditional automated driving up to 130 km/h on motorways or similar roads From entrance to exit, on all lanes, incl. overtaking Driver must activate the system, but does not have to monitor the system Driver can at all times override or switch off the system Take over request in time, if automation gets to its system limits 11 // 4 October 2015

11 // Automation in highway scenarios: Merge-in manoeuvres This situation is challenge for an automated driving functions of the first generation! 12 // 4 October 2015

12 // Automation in highway scenarios: cooperative driving Within AdaptIVe, a cooperative automated driving vehicle will send / receive and process the following information via vehicle-2-vehicle communication: status information information about the environment (collective perception) information about intention 13 // 4 October 2015

13 // Merge-in manoeuvres: Phase 1 Find a Gap! Sharing information about the environment (collective perception) 14 // 4 October 2015

14 // Merge-in manoeuvres: Phase 2 Discuss about intention! Sharing information about the intention 15 // 4 October 2015

15 // Merge-in manoeuvres: Phase 3 Conduct manoeuvre! 16 // 4 October 2015

16 // SP7 Evaluation - Status Development of an Evaluation framework Deliverable D7.1 Test and Evaluation Plan has been finalized Evaluation Methodologies Technical, user-related, in-traffic and impact assessment Different approaches for Event-based and Continuously operating Classification // Operation time Level of automation Function / System // Focus of Evaluation Evaluation // (depending on classification) Research Questions Hypotheses Indicators Test Methods // (depending on classification) Test environment Test tools Test amount Impact Assessment // Working Methodology for impact analysis of automated driving applications Considering safety as well as environmental impact of the functions Start with the first simulation for the environmental impact assessment (motorway scenario) Safety Environment Evaluation // User-related Technical In traffic 17 // 4 October 2015

17 // SP7 Evaluation - Next steps Next steps for the technical, user-related in-traffic assessment Development of test tools (e.g. logging tools, setting up simulation environments) Discussion test planned tailor the test plan the different demonstrators Tests are expected from Summer 2016 on Next steps for the safety impact assessment Setting up the required simulation in the traffic context as well as the detailed simulation of simulations Collecting required information about function behaviour and the traffic Conduction of impact assessment 18 // 4 October 2015

18 Felix Fahrenkrog Institut für Kraftfahrzeuge, RWTH Aachen University Thank you.