ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE
|
|
- Cuthbert Sutton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE Technical Report Prepared For Ardstone Capital Ltd. 48 Fitzwilliam Square Dublin Technical Report Prepared By Jennifer Harmon BSc MIOA Our Reference JH/16/9191NR01a Date Of Issue 27 November 2017
2 Document History Document Reference Original Issue Date JH/16/9191NR01 12 December 2016 Revision Level Revision Date Description Sections Affected a 27 November 2017 Site Layout All Record of Approval Details Written by Approved by Signature Name Jennifer Harmon Ronan Murphy Title Senior Acoustic Consultant Senior Acoustic Consultant Date 27 November November 2017 Page 2
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AWN Consulting has been requested by Ardstone Capital Limited to undertake an assessment of the potential road traffic noise intrusion on a proposed residential development at Wonderful Barn, Leixlip Co. Kildare. For the assessment of noise, guidance has been taken from the following documents: Kildare Local Authorities Second Noise Action Plan (July 2013), and; BS 8233:2014 Guidelines for Sound Insulation and Noise Reduction for Buildings. Making reference to the above documents, the following daytime and night time internal noise criteria are proposed: Internal Room Daytime (07:00hrs to 23:00hrs) LAeq (db Re 2 x 10-5 pa ) Night-time (23:00hrs to 07:00hrs) Living Rooms Bedrooms An acoustic model has been developed for the proposed development in order to calculate noise levels across the proposed site, taking into account the site layout plans and road traffic volumes along the M4 Motorway. The predicted noise levels at the external façade of the development buildings have been used to determine the internal noise levels within living room and bedroom spaces, taking account of the proposed building elements (i.e. glazing and walls), the surface area of each and the receiving room volumes. The assessment has determined that the internal noise environment within the development are predicted to be within the recommended criteria adopted from BS 8233:2014 with glazing types offering the following minimum sound insulation performance as follows: Glazing Specification Octave Band Centre Frequency (Hz) Overall k 2k 4k Type Type Rw Figure 7 in this report illustrates the location of the enhanced glazing Type 2 across the development. The assessment has concluded that the insulation capabilities of the development are deemed to be acceptable in order to achieve the target noise levels as outlined in Section 7.7 Planning For Noise Management, set out in Kildare Local Authorities Noise Action Plan and achieve the recommended internal noise levels for residential dwellings set out in BS 8233:2014. Page 3
4 CONTENTS Page Executive Summary Introduction Assessment Criteria Kildare Noise Action Plan (2013) British Standard BS 8233 (2014) WHO Community Noise Summary Site Description Assessment of Site Noise Survey Survey Results Assessment of the Development Site Assessment of the Proposed Development Assessment of Building Sound Insulation Glazing Wall Construction Ventilation Strategy Conclusions 16 Figure 1 Site context and approximate red line boundary 8 Figure 2 Noise Monitoring Position 9 Figure 3 Calculated L den noise levels across development site 11 Figure 4 Calculated L night noise levels across development site 12 Figure 5 Daytime noise levels with proposed development 13 Figure 6 Night-time noise levels with proposed development 14 Appendix A Acoustic Technical Data 17 Page 4
5 1.0 INTRODUCTION AWN Consulting has been requested by Ardstone Capital Limited to undertake an assessment of the potential noise impact associated with the M4 Motorway on a proposed new residential development at Wonderful Barn, Leixlip, Co. Kildare. The noise impact assessment is being carried out in order to ensure a good environment for residential amenity is provided. It is proposed to use guidance from British Standard BS 8233:2014 Guidelines for Sound Insulation and Noise Reduction for Buildings and the World Health Organisation s (WHO) document Guidelines for Community Noise (1999). The assessment methodologies contained within these guidance documents are considered to be current best practice for the assessment of traffic noise on residential developments. This report will include the following: Review of the relevant content of the standards that will be used for the noise assessment; Comment on the expected noise levels across the site, and; Review of mitigation measures that will be considered in relation to the levels of noise incident on the site. Page 5
6 2.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA The following section discusses the relevant guidance documents used to set appropriate external and internal noise levels across the site. 2.1 Kildare Noise Action Plan ( ) The Noise Action Plan states the following in terms of the proposed noise control measures to be adopted when considering developments which introduce people to noise: Whilst the control of external levels of environmental noise constitutes one aspect of noise management within planning, and aims to provide benefit to amenity spaces, the control of noise levels within residential properties, and other noise sensitive premises also plays an important role. In the scenario where new noise sensitive premises are introduced to locations already exposed to significant levels of long term environmental noise as set out in the Environmental Noise Regulations, i.e. 70dB L den and 57 db L night, it is considered appropriate to consider aiming to achieve target internal noise levels within noise sensitive rooms, such as living rooms and bedrooms. In the case of new development, or conversions, these targets could be introduced through the use of appropriate planning conditions, and possibly some form of pre-completion testing as used in a number of other EU countries. The choice of targets for internal noise levels could be informed by the WHO Guidelines for Community Noise (2000) and Night Noise Guidelines for Europe (2009) or BS 8233 Given the guidance levels set out within WHO and NNG typically refer to external noise levels, reference has been made to BS 8233 in order to set appropriate internal noise levels within sensitive rooms of the developments. In this instance, reference has been made to the updated 2014 version of the standard. 2.2 British Standard BS 8233 (2014) The standard, BS 8233 (2014) Guidelines for Sound Insulation and Noise Reduction For Buildings, sets out recommended internal noise levels for several different building types from external noise sources such as road traffic noise. The guidance is primarily for use by designers and hence BS 8233 may be used as the basis for an appropriate schedule of noise control measures. The recommended internal noise levels for residential developments are set out below. Activity Location Day 07:00 to 23:00hrs db LAeq,16hour Night 23:00 to 07:00hrs db LAeq,8hour Resting Living room 35 - Dining Dining room/area 40 - Sleeping (daytime resting) Bedroom Table 1 Summary of recommended internal noise levels from BS 8233 The document also notes that where development is considered necessary or desirable, despite external noise levels above WHO guidelines, the internal target levels may be relaxed by up to 5 db and reasonable internal conditions still achieved. Page 6
7 In relation to noise levels in external amenity areas, BS 8233 provides the following guidance: For traditional external areas that are used for amenity space, such as gardens and patios, it is desirable that the external noise level does not exceed 50 db L Aeq,T, with an upper guideline value of 55 db L Aeq,T which would be acceptable in noisier environments. However, it is also recognized that these guideline values are not achievable in all circumstances where development might be desirable. In higher noise areas, such as city centres or urban areas adjoining the strategic transport network, a compromise between elevated noise levels and other factors, such as the convenience of living in these locations or making efficient use of land resources to ensure development needs can be met, might be warranted. In such a situation, development should be designed to achieve the lowest practicable levels in these external amenity spaces, but should not be prohibited 2.3 WHO Community Noise The World Health Organization (WHO) document Guidelines for Community Noise (1999) provides the following design criteria and guidelines in relation to noise: 2.4 Summary The effects of noise in dwellings, typically, are sleep disturbance, annoyance and speech interference. For bedrooms the critical effect is sleep disturbance. Indoor guideline values for bedrooms are 30dB L Aeq for continuous noise and 45dB L Amax for single sound events. Lower noise levels may be disturbing depending on the nature of the noise source. To enable casual conversation indoors during daytime, the sound level of interfering noise should not exceed 35dB L Aeq. In summary, and with consideration of the guidelines outlined in the Kildare Noise Action Plan, WHO Guidelines for Community Noise and BS 8233:2014 it is considered that the following criteria are relevant in the context of the proposed development: 35dB L Aeq,16hour daytime within living / bedrooms; 40dB L Aeq,16hour daytime within dining rooms, and; 30dB L Aeq,8hour night-time within bedrooms. External noise levels in amenity areas should be designed so as to achieve the lowest practicable levels, within reasonable design constraints. Page 7
8 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located to the north of the Wonderful Barn, Leixlip Co. Kildare. The site is bound to the south by greenfield lands associated with the Wonderful Barn grounds and the M4 Motorway to beyond. The north, east and west of the site are all bound by existing residential estates. Figure 1 illustrates the site location in the context of the surrounding lands. Figure 1 Site context and approximate red line boundary The proposal includes for a total of 450 properties in a mixture of terrace and semidetached 3 and 4 bedroom dwellings. Page 8
9 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF SITE 4.1 Noise Survey Survey Details An attended noise survey was conducted at the site over a daytime period to obtain a profile of typical noise levels at different locations in close proximity to and away from the M4 to inform the assessment. The survey was conducted between 10:30hrs to 13:30hrs on 25 November 2016 using a Brüel and Kjaer Type 2250 Sound level meter. Noise levels were measured over 15 minute periods at each location. A summary of the acoustic parameters discussed below are included in Appendix A. The three monitoring locations are displayed in Figure 2 below. N3 N2 N1 Figure 2 Noise monitoring positions Survey Results Location N1 The results of the noise measurements made at Location N1 are presented in Table 2 below. Start Time (Hrs) Measured Noise Levels, db re 2 x 10-5 pa LAeq LAFMax LAF10 LAF90 10: : : Average Calculated Lden 65 Table 2 Results of noise survey Location N1 Page 9
10 Noise levels measured at this location were dominated by traffic along the M4 Motorway, traffic along the R404, occasional traffic passing along local access road pedestrian activity and overhead aircraft. Location N2 The results of the noise measurements made at Location N2 are presented in Table 3 below. Start Time (Hrs) Measured Noise Levels, db re 2 x 10-5 pa LAeq LAFMax LAF10 LAF90 11: : : Average Calculated Lden 68 Table 3 Results of noise survey Location N2 Noise levels measured at this location were dominated by traffic along the M4 Motorway, overhead aircraft and occasional pedestrian activity. The results of the noise measurements made at Location N3 are presented in Table 4 below. Start Time (Hrs) Measured Noise Levels, db re 2 x 10-5 pa LAeq LAFMax LAF10 LAF90 10: : : Average Calculated Lden 57 Table 4 Results of noise survey Location N3 Noise levels measured at this location were noted to be influenced by distance M4 traffic, birdsong and overhead aircraft. 4.3 Assessment of The Development Site In order to calculate noise levels across the site, a noise model of the lands was developed. The general methodology and details of the software package used (i.e. Brüel & Kjær Type 7810 Predictor) are presented in Appendix A of this document. The noise model was developed using OS mapping for the extent of the study area and the M4 Motorway alignment, and estimated traffic flow in terms of the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT). Traffic data for the M4 was obtained from the NRA s automated traffic counters for the closest automated data counter along this road located between Junction 6 Celbridge and Junction 7 Maynooth. The counted AADT traffic along this route for 2016 is 56,451 (93% coverage) with 5.2% HGV for the year The annual growth factor was calculated as 0.5%. Page 10
11 A modelled flow of 60,000 AADT was used in the model with a road speed of 120km/h. Estimated traffic flows of 5,000 AADT were modelled along the R404 and R449 to the east and west of the development site respectively. The model was calibrated against the noise levels measured at the monitoring locations N1 to N3 and a strong correlation was achieved (within 2dB of measured levels) hence is a good representation of traffic noise levels incident across the site. Based on the model inputs discussed above, noise levels across the development site have been predicted in order to determine the noise impact using the Kildare Noise Action Plan definition of significant noise levels above which mitigation measures may need to be considered. The Action Plan defines these levels as follows: >70dB(A) L den, and; >57dB(A) L night. Figures 3 and 4 present the calculated L den and L night across the site. Figure 3 Calculated Lden noise levels across development site The results indicate that noise levels are in the range of 50 to 66dB L den across the site. Noise levels at all locations across the development site are below the L den threshold value of 70dB. Figure 4 presents the calculated L night across the development site. Page 11
12 Figure 4 Calculated Lnight noise levels across development site The range of noise levels calculated across the site are in the range of <50 to 57dB L night. The most southern parts of the development site are therefore just at the Kildare Noise Action Plan noise threshold level for night-time periods. Page 12
13 6.0 ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT In order to determine the noise levels at the various façades of the proposed development, the computer noise model discussed in Section 5.0 was modified to include the proposed buildings. Receivers were located at the facades of the most exposed buildings at first floor level. The calculated noise levels at these receiver locations will be used to determine the required sound insulation specification of the building envelope to comply with the internal noise levels as recommended is BS8233:2014 discussed previously in Section 2.2. In order to calculate noise levels over the appropriate periods in compliance with this standard, noise levels are calculated over daytime periods, i.e. 07:00 to 23:00hrs and night-time periods, 23:00 to 07:00hrs. The calculated noise levels across the site for the daytime and night-time periods, incorporating the development site are presented in Figures 5 and 6 below. The calculation height for both scenarios is 4m above ground level. Figure 5 Daytime noise levels (db LAeq,16hour) with development in place Page 13
14 Figure 6 Night-time noise levels (db LAeq,8hour) with development in place Specific noise levels have been calculated at the facades of key exposed properties across the development site. Highest external noise levels are calculated at properties facing towards the M4 which do not benefit from screening from the development on-site buildings, noise levels at these facades are calculated in the range of 58 to 66dB L Aeq,16hr. At all other facades, set back from the southern properties, calculated daytime noise levels are below 55dB L Aeq,16hr. The sound insulation requirements of the proposed building facades based on the calculated noise levels are set out in the following section. Page 14
15 7.0 ASSESSMENT OF BUILDING SOUND INSULATION Based on the predicted day and night-time noise levels presented in Section 6, the appropriate sound insulation performance of the building envelope can be specified in order to achieve the appropriate internal noise levels set out in Section Glazing As is the case in most buildings, the glazed elements of the building envelope are typically the weakest element from a sound insulation perspective. On review of the calculated noise levels across the development site over day and night-time periods, two glazing specifications have been determined for the residential properties in order to achieve the recommended internal noise levels for day and night-time periods within living rooms and bedrooms. In this instance, glazing Type 1 offering a minimum sound insulation performance of 33dB R w is deemed suitable for the majority of properties across the development site. A standard thermal double glazed system will typically achieve this level of performance. Type 2 providing an enhanced sound insulation performance of 37dB R w or greater is recommended for properties within higher noise zones. Figure 7 illustrates the recommended location of glazing Type 2 highlighted in red. This predominately relates to bedrooms and living spaces of properties along this line. For all other property facades, glazing Type 1 provides a sufficient level of sound insulation. Glazing Type 2 Figure 7 Areas of Glazing Type 2 Across development site Table 5 below is deemed suitable for the full development in order to achieve an acceptable internal noise environment. Page 15
16 Glazing Specification Octave Band Centre Frequency (Hz) k 2k 4k Overall Rw Type Type Table 5 Sound insulation performance requirements for glazing, SRI (db) Taking account of the external noise levels, the surface area of the glazing and walls, and the relevant receiving room volumes, the calculated internal noise levels are below 35dB L Aeq,16hr for daytime periods and 30dB L Aeq,8hr night-time within bedrooms, the most sensitive rooms of the building. This glazing specification also achieves the internal daytime noise criterion for daytime periods within living rooms of 40dB L Aeq. It is important to note that the acoustic performance specifications detailed herein are minimum requirements which apply to the overall glazing system. In the context of the acoustic performance specification the glazing system is understood to include any and all of the component parts that form part of the glazing element of the façade, i.e. glass, frames, seals, openable elements etc. 7.2 Wall Construction In general all wall constructions, i.e. block work or concrete, offer a high degree of sound insulation, much greater than that offered by the glazing systems set out in Section 7.1. Therefore, noise intrusion via the wall construction will be minimal. The calculated internal noise levels across the building façade have assumed a minimum sound reduction index of 50dB R w for this construction. 7.3 Ventilation The ventilation strategy for the development will be in accordance with Part F of the Building Regulations and will be finalised at the detail design stage. Options which will be considered in order to achieve compliance with background ventilation requirements will be adjustable hit and miss acoustic ventilators or trickle vents built into the façade or window frames respectively. The installed ventilation either through window trickle vents or wall vents should achieve a sound insulation performance equal to or greater than the glazing specification noted in Section 7.1 above. Page 16
17 8.0 CONCLUSIONS Using guidance outlined in the Kildare Noise Action Plan, the development site in question has been assessed in terms of its noise exposure category from road traffic noise. Based on this assessment, the development site has been found to be below the range of noise levels deemed to be significant and where the onset of mitigation measures would typically be considered for noise, i.e. 70dB L den and 57dB L night. In order to comply with Section 7.7 of the Noise Action Plan, guidance contained within BS 8233 has been used to determine a range of suitable internal noise levels for sensitive rooms within the buildings. Calculated noise levels at the external façade of all development buildings have been used to determine the internal noise levels within living room and bedroom spaces, taking account of the proposed standard building elements. The assessment has determined that the internal noise environment within the sensitive areas of the development are predicted to be within the recommended criteria adopted from BS 8233 using a standard double glazing system. The minimum sound insulation performance of the assumed glazing is set out within the body of this report. Page 17
18 A.1 Acoustic Parameters APPENDIX A ACOUSTIC TECHNICAL DATA db Hertz (Hz) L Aeq,T L AF10 Decibel - The scale in which sound pressure level is expressed. It is defined as 20 times the logarithm of the ratio between the RMS pressure of the sound field and the reference pressure of 20 micro-pascals (20 μpa). The unit of sound frequency in cycles per second. This is the equivalent continuous sound level. It is a type of average and is used to describe a fluctuating noise in terms of a single noise level over the sample period (T).The closer the L Aeq value is to either the L AF10 or L AF90 value indicates the relative impact of the intermittent sources and their contribution. The relative spread between the values determines the impact of intermittent sources, such as traffic, on the background. Refers to those A-weighted noise levels in the top 10 percentile of the sampling interval; it is the level which is exceeded for 10% of the measurement period. It is used to determine the intermittent high noise level features of locally generated noise and usually gives an indicator of the level of road traffic. Measured using the Fast time weighting. L AF90 Refers to those A-weighted noise levels in the lower 90 percentile of the sampling interval; it is the level which is exceeded for 90% of the measurement period. It will therefore exclude the intermittent features of traffic and is used to describe a background level. Measured using the Fast time weighting. L AFmax L AFmin The maximum RMS A-weighted sound pressure level occurring within a specified time period. Measured using the Fast time weighting. The minimum RMS A-weighted sound pressure level occurring within a specified time period. Measured using the Fast time weighting. Page 18
19 L den Is the 24 hour noise rating level determined by the averaging of the L day with the L evening plus a 5 db penalty and the L night plus a 10 db penalty. L den is calculated using the following formula: Where: - Lday is the A-weighted long-term average sound level as defined in ISO , determined over all the day periods of a year; - - Levening is the A-weighted long-term average sound level as defined in ISO , determined over all the evening periods of a year and; - - Lnight is the A-weighted long-term average sound level as defined in ISO , determined over all the night periods of a year. A.2 Noise Model Information A computer-based prediction model has been prepared in order to quantify the traffic noise level associated with the M4 Motorway on the proposed development site. Brüel & Kjær Type 7810 Predictor Proprietary noise calculation software was used for the purposes of this impact assessment. The selected software, Brüel & Kjær Type 7810 Predictor, calculates traffic noise levels in accordance with CRTN guidance. Brüel & Kjær Type 7810 Predictor is a proprietary noise calculation package for computing noise levels in the vicinity of noise sources. Predictor predicts noise levels in different ways depending on the selected prediction standard. In general, however, the resultant noise level is calculated taking into account a range of factors affecting the propagation of sound, including: the magnitude of the noise source in terms of sound power or traffic flow and average velocity; the distance between the source and receiver; the presence of obstacles such as screens or barriers in the propagation path; the presence of reflecting surfaces; the hardness of the ground between the source and receiver. Prediction of traffic noise Noise emissions during the operational phase of the project have been modelled using Predictor in accordance with CRTN. The CRTN method of predicting noise from a road scheme consists of the following five elements: divide the road scheme into segments so that the variation of noise within this segment is small; calculate the basic noise level at a reference distance of 10 metres from the nearside carriageway edge for each segment; Page 19
20 assess for each segment the noise level at the reception point taking into account distance attenuation and screening of the source line; correct the noise level at the reception point to take account of site layout features including reflections from buildings and facades, and the size of source segment; combine the contributions from all segments to give the predicted noise level at the receiver location for the whole road scheme. Note that all calculations are performed to one decimal place. Page 20
This report assesses the outward noise and vibration impact of the proposed development on its surrounding environment.
8. NOISE AND VIBRATION 8.1 Introduction This report has been prepared by AWN to form part of an EIAR for the proposed residential development at Wonderful Barn, Barnhall, Leixlip. The chapter assesses
More information8 Noise and Vibration
8 Noise and Vibration 8.1 Introduction This chapter of the EIS assesses the potential noise and vibration impact of the Proposed Project on the baseline environment. The potential noise impact due to the
More informationHAINE ROAD, RAMSGATE NOISE ASSESSMENT
PROJECT NAME CLIENT PROJECT RECORD HAINE ROAD, RAMSGATE ACTIVE LAND & BUILD LTD. REPORT DETAILS TYPE REFERENCE 1775\AR\12-2017\748 ISSUE DATE DECEMBER 2017 NICHOLAS JONES AUTHOR REVIEWER BEng(Hons) CEng
More information8. Appendix F Acoustic Assessment
8. Appendix F Acoustic Assessment HFT Ltd 06-Jun-2017 Assessment of Noise Effects Mixed Industrial Development at 28 Inlet Road, Takanini Mixed Industrial Development at 28 Inlet Road, Takanini Client:
More informationNoise Impact Assessment
Noise Impact Assessment December 2016 Prepared by SRL Technical Services Ltd Telephone +44(0)1787 247595 Website www.srltsl.com London, Birmingham, Manchester, Sudbury Quality Assurance Project Title Document
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REVISED with ADDENDUM for ROOFTOP OUTDOOR LIVING AREA
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REVISED with ADDENDUM for ROOFTOP OUTDOOR LIVING AREA REPORT PREPARED FOR SURFACE DEVELOPMENTS 61 FOREST HILL AVE. OTTAWA,
More informationLOTS 2 & 3 ANKETELL ROAD, ANKETELL SUBDIVISION ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT FOR TERRANOVIS
Rochdale Holdings Pty Ltd A.B.N. 85 009 049 067 trading as: HERRING STORER ACOUSTICS Suite 34, 11 Preston Street, Como, W.A. 6152 P.O. Box 219, Como, W.A. 6952 Telephone: (08) 9367 6200 Facsimile: (08)
More informationAssessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase
Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment - Draft Assessment - Draft Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase A038_790147
More informationRoma to Brisbane Pipeline Dalby Compressor Station Upgrade Environmental Management Plan. Appendix 8. Noise Assessment
Roma to Brisbane Pipeline Dalby Compressor Station Upgrade Environmental Management Plan Appendix 8 Noise Assessment PR104962-1 Rev 0; June 2011 PR104962-1 Rev 0; June 2011 Roma to Brisbane Pipeline Dalby
More information100 Avenue Road, Swiss Cottage, London
100 Avenue Road, Swiss Cottage, London 296993-01(00) NOVEMBER 2017 RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No.: 296993-01(00) Title: 100 Avenue Road, Swiss Cottage, London - Client: Date: 30 th November 2017 Office:
More information9. NOISE AND VIBRATION
9. NOISE AND VIBRATION 9.1 Introduction 9.1.1 This Chapter details the existing baseline noise and vibration levels together with assessments of the suitability of the site for residential and commercial
More informationAssessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase
Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment - Draft Assessment - Draft Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 33-37 ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 33-37 ROL Phase
More informationSELWYN PRIMARY SCHOOL, LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY
202 Uxbridge Road London W12 7JP Tel: +44(0)203 475 2280 Fax: +44(0)203 475 2281 info@clementacoustics.co.uk www.clementacoustics.co.uk SELWYN PRIMARY SCHOOL, LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY Report 8991-ENS-03
More informationBS4142:2014 Assessment for Planning Application
Southbrook Farm, Sudbrook Peaking Power Generation Plant BS4142:2014 Assessment for Planning Application 20 th March 2018 inacoustic cymru Talbot Green Business Centre, 2 Talbot Green Business Park, Talbot
More informationAssessment. Assessment. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase
Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment Assessment Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 15-19 ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 15-19 ROL Phase A038_790400_02
More informationPROPOSED CO-OPERATIVE SUPERMARKET, KNIGHTON
REPORT N O 70020648-001 PROPOSED CO-OPERATIVE SUPERMARKET, KNIGHTON NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MAY 2016 PROPOSED CO-OPERATIVE SUPERMARKET, KNIGHTON NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT The Mid-Counties Co-Operative Final
More informationFreight Rail Noise Policy and Practice
Freight and Logistics Council of Western Australia BULLETIN # 07 Introduction Bulletin No. 7 from the Freight and Logistics Council of Western Australia discusses recent research by the Council into freight
More informationNoise Assessment Report
Noise Assessment Report 176 Greenfield Avenue Prepared for: TC United Group Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. February 8, 2016 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 Table of Contents
More informationFreight Train Noise Assessments
PO Box 717 Hillarys WA 6923 T: 9245 3223 F:9300 4199 E: mike@lgacoustics.com.au W: www.lgacoustics.com.au Freight Train Noise Assessments Reference: 14113026-02 Final.docx Prepared for: Freight & Logistics
More informationFor inspection purposes only.
10.0 NOISE AND VIBRATION 10.1 INTRODUCTION This section assesses the likely noise and vibration impacts arising from the proposed development in the context of current relevant standards and guidance and
More informationTidbury Green Farmhouse, Tidbury Green. Proposed new Public House Report on existing noise climate 08/12/17 Revision 3 ACOUSTICS
08/12/17 Revision 3 ACOUSTICS Tel: +44 (0) 121 450 4800 Audit sheet Hoare Lea Acoustics 6 th Floor West 54 Hagley Road Edgbaston Birmingham B16 8PE REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUED BY REVIEWED BY 0-DFC
More informationSection 12: Noise & Vibration
Section 12: Noise & Vibration 12.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the EIS has been prepared by Byrne Environmental Consulting Ltd to identify and assess the potential noise and vibrational impacts that the
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Assessment Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment 151-153 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE14-064 Noise Prepared For: Brad Caco Sun Life Financial Center, East Tower 3250 Bloor Street West, Suite 1000 Toronto,
More informationReport. Fighting Cocks Bar & Venue 56 Old London Road, Kingston upon Thames. Acoustic Assessment. Prepared by J. R. Tee BSc. (Hons.
Report Fighting Cocks Bar & Venue 56 Old London Road, Kingston upon Thames Acoustic Assessment Prepared by J. R. Tee BSc. (Hons.) MIOA Date 23rd June 2015 Project No 1414725 Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0
More informationAppendix E Details of Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodologies
Appendix E Details of Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodologies E Noise and Vibration E. INTRODUCTION This Appendix provides details of the methodologies and assumptions made in various parts of the
More informationLot 12 Honeywood Ave, Wandi Traffic Noise Assessment Report
Lot 12 Honeywood Ave, Wandi Traffic Noise Assessment Report Wandi Developments Pty Ltd c/- Terranovis 11 February 2014 Revision No. 1 Prepared by Andreas Lejholm Project Number: 25264-PER-N Ground Floor,
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 12 HAMILTON AVENUE NORTH OTTAWA, ON.
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 12 HAMILTON AVENUE NORTH OTTAWA, ON. REPORT PREPARED FOR SURFACE DEVELOPMENTS 61 FOREST HILL AVE. OTTAWA, ON, K2C 1P7 September 15, 2016 16419 1 NOISE IMPACT
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Building 103 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Building 103 Dundas Street West Oakville, Ontario Prepared for: 103 Dundas Corporation Attn: Zaki Wahbeh 2184 Providence Road Oakville, ON L6H 6Z2 Prepared
More informationStatus: Rev: Comments Date: Author: Reviewer:
MB ASSESSMENT OF NOISE EFFECTS Rp 002 R02 2016907 3 May 2018 84 Symonds Street PO Box 5811 Wellesley Street Auckland 1141 New Zealand T: +64 9 379 7822 F: +64 9 309 3540 www.marshallday.com Project: MB
More informationAdditional information relevant to Section 7 is presented in Appendix D in Volume 2 of 3 of the EIS.
7. NOISE & VIBRATION Additional information relevant to Section 7 is presented in Appendix D in Volume 2 of 3 of the EIS. 7.1 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT 7.1.1 Monitoring Continuous noise monitoring was undertaken
More informationPROPOSED PLAN CHANGE: ALEXANDER ROAD UPPER HUTT. Noise Assessment. Rp W. 27 July 2012
PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE: ALEXANDER ROAD UPPER HUTT Noise Assessment Rp001 2012185W 27 July 2012 Level 2 5 Willeston Street PO Box 25442 Panama Street Wellington 6146 New Zealand T: +64 4 499 3016 F: +64 4
More informationNoise Assessment Report for Proposed Residential Development, Land West of High Green, Catterick Village
Noise Assessment Report for Proposed Residential Development, Report Reference no. 2776.11/1 7 th April 2016 Report prepared by: Owen Downey BSc(Hons) MIOA On behalf of: Pallett Hill Sand & Gravel Co Ltd
More informationMann Avenue Development 87 Mann Avenue Noise Control Study
Mann Avenue Development 87 Mann Avenue Noise Control Study Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 August 13, 2013 Novatech File:
More informationNo significant construction or operational vibration impacts are expected.
8 NOISE AND VIBRATION 8.1 SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL IMPACTS impacts for the construction and operation of the proposed CCGT power plant development are expected as these will be mitigated through design and
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE REPORT SANDSTONE SEPULVEDA
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE REPORT SANDSTONE SEPULVEDA DATE 09/17/2015 PAGES - 13 TO Abhijeet Mankar Johnson Fain amankar@johnsonfain.com Donna Shen Tripp Craig Lawson & Co., LLC donna@craiglawson.com FROM James
More informationPROPOSED CO-OPERATIVE CONVENIENCE STORE AT MARINER PH, MORTIMER ROAD, SOUTH SHIELDS NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. On behalf of: The Co-operative Group
PROPOSED CO-OPERATIVE CONVENIENCE STORE AT MARINER PH, MORTIMER ROAD, SOUTH SHIELDS NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT On behalf of: The Co-operative Group May 2016 PROPOSED CO-OPERATIVE CONVENIENCE STORE AT MARINER
More informationEDINBURGH TRAM LINES ONE AND TWO
EDINBURGH TRAM LINES ONE AND TWO NOISE AND VIBRATION POLICY MARCH 2006 1 INTRODUCTION This policy statement sets out the approach the promoter proposes to adopt to mitigate noise from the operation of
More informationAppendices. Acoustic Environment Assessment MAROOCHY SHIRE COUNCIL PLANNING SCHEME POLICY NO. 7. Contents ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT
MAROOCHY SHIRE COUNCIL PLANNING SCHEME POLICY NO. 7 Acoustic Environment Assessment Contents 1 Introduction...188 1.1 Purpose...188 1.2 Scope...188 1.3 Definitions...188 1.4 Expertise Required to Prepare
More information10 Noise and Vibration
10 Noise and Vibration Introduction This chapter assesses the potential noise and vibration impacts on the surrounding environment associated with the construction and operation of the proposed at Ringaskiddy,
More informationProject: FONTERRA STIRLING. Prepared for: Fonterra Limited PO Box 459 Hamilton Attention: Brigid Buckley. Report No.
FONTERRA STIRLING PROPOSED NOISE CONTROL BOUNDARY Rp 001 2016009C 20 September 2016 Level 369 Cambridge Terrace PO Box 4071 Christchurch 8140 New Zealand T: +64 3365 8455 F: +64 33658477 www.marshallday.com
More informationMerivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study
Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 Submitted:
More informationA CASE STUDY ON COST/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT OF ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE AMELIORATION WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE ROAD RESERVE
A CASE STUDY ON COST/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT OF ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE AMELIORATION WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE ROAD RESERVE Douglas, P. (1)*, De Silva, S. (1), Chen, L. (1) and Peters, J. (2) (1) RMIT University, Melbourne,
More informationNoise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study EMGO (North Oakville I) Ltd., Town of Oakville, Ontario For Emgo (North Oakville I) Ltd. 2173 Turnberry Road Burlington, ON L7M 4P8 Prepared by Victor Garcia, BASc Reviewed by Sheeba
More informationPROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE
1/355 Manukau Road Epsom, Auckland 1023 PO Box 26283 Epsom, Auckland 1344 T: 09 638 8414 E: hegley@acoustics.co.nz PROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE Report No 16295 Prepared
More information10 Noise and Vibration
Blossom Street Replacement Environmental Statement Volume I Preface Update 2015 This replacement November 2015 Environmental Statement (hereafter referred as the November 2015 Replacement ES or this Replacement
More informationNoise Assessment Report
Noise Assessment Report 19 & 23 Bachman Terrace Prepared for: Tega Homes Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. June 5, 2015 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF
More informationNSL4 respectively. All survey measurement and nearest noise sensitive locations are illustrated in Figures 14.1.
Noise & Vibration 14 14 Noise & Vibration 14.1 Introduction The proposed expansion will consist of a number of new process equipment / buildings that is expected to double the output capacity of the distillery.
More informationNOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...
NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
More informationTraffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario
Traffic Noise Assessment 333 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-045 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd Toronto, ON M4H 1P4 Prepared By: Joshua Foster,
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE MEADOWS IN HALF MOON BAY PHASE 5
REPORT PROJECT: 115496-5.2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE MEADOWS IN HALF MOON BAY PHASE 5 Prepared for TAMARACK HOMES by IBI GROUP APRIL 2018 IBI GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
More information11.0 NOISE AND VIBRATION
11.0 NOISE AND VIBRATION Introduction 11.1 This chapter of the ES assesses the likely significant effects of the Overall Development in terms of noise and vibration and is supported by Appendices 11.1
More informationBAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA
Charles M Salter Associates Inc BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Kim Havens Wilson Meany Sullivan Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3330
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1208 OLD MONTREAL ROAD
REPORT 109575-5.2.2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1208 OLD MONTREAL ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for DCR/PHOENIX HOMES by IBI Group February 9, 2018 IBI GROUP REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT
More informationContact: Julie McDonagh. Thursday, 10 September Amex Corporation Level 1, 56 Boundary Street PO Box 3790 South Brisbane QLD 4101
Our Ref pl_a038_790147_stage 8_13_14 category 2_Rev1.docx Contact: Julie McDonagh Thursday, 10 September 2015 Amex Corporation Level 1, 56 Boundary Street PO Box 3790 South Brisbane QLD 4101 Attention:
More informationChristchurch City Plan Proposed Plan Change
Resource Management Act 1991 52 Christchurch City Plan Proposed Plan Change Note 1: The proposed rules in this Plan Change will have no legal effect under Section 9 and Clause 10(5) of Schedule 1 of the
More informationCRANBOURNE LANDFILL. Environmental Noise Assessment. Rp ML. 10 May 2013
CRANBOURNE LANDFILL Environmental Noise Assessment Rp 001 2012351ML 10 May 2013 4/46 Balfour St Chippendale NSW 2008 T: +612 9282 9422 Fax: +612 9281 3611 www.marshallday.com Project: CRANBOURNE LANDFILL
More informationProposed Lidl Food Store Muller Road Bristol. Environmental Noise Report for Planning
Proposed Lidl Food Store Muller Road Bristol Environmental Noise Report for Planning Reference: 5772/P/BL/pw October 2014 2 Proposed Lidl Food Store, Muller Road, Bristol Environmental Noise Report for
More informationGuelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study
Guelph Curling Club Development Traffic Noise Impact Study Development Location Prepared For: Guelph Curling Club Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. 43 Forest Road Cambridge ON N1S 3B4 pgrubb@ptsl.com
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Hospice 2050 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Hospice 2050 University Avenue East, Waterloo, Ontario Prepared for: Hospice of Waterloo Region 298 Lawrence Avenue Kitchener, ON N2M 1Y4 Prepared by Sheeba Paul, MEng,
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY Development Address: 765 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario City of Ottawa File Number: D07-12-18-0059 Client: Shepherds of Good Hope c/o: CSV Architects 402-1066 Somerset Street
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON.
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL 47 HAVELOCK STREET OTTAWA, ON. REPORT PREPARED FOR SURFACE DEVELOPMENTS 61 FOREST HILL AVE. OTTAWA, ON, K2C 1P7 March 25, 2015 15078 1 NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
More informationProposed Lidl Food Store West Hendford Yeovil. Environmental Noise Report for Planning
Proposed Lidl Food Store West Hendford Yeovil Environmental Noise Report for Planning Reference: 6087/BL/pw October 2015 2 Proposed Lidl Food Store, West Hendford, Yeovil Environmental Noise Report for
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 361 Tanbark Road Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 361 Tanbark Road Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario Prepared for: Blythwood Homes Inc. 7058 Ridgewood Crescent Niagara Falls, Ontario L2J 3H1 Prepared
More informationSECTIONAL DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW PLAN CHANGE 15 NORTH EAST INDUSTRIAL ZONE NOISE
SECTIONAL DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW PLAN CHANGE 15 NORTH EAST INDUSTRIAL ZONE NOISE For PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL N1447 PC15 NEIZ Final V1 4 September 2014 Nigel Lloyd Director of Acoustic Services Mobile:
More informationCHAPTER 8 NOISE NORTHAMPTON GATEWAY
CHAPTER 8 NOISE NORTHAMPTON GATEWAY 8 NOISE & VIBRATION 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8.1.1 8.1.2 8.1.3 8.1.4 8.1.5 This chapter considers the potential noise and vibration effects that may arise as a result of the
More informationNoise Assessment Report Riverside Drive Phase I
Noise Assessment Report - 2887 Riverside Drive Phase I Project # 160401333 Prepared for: Youth Services Bureau Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Introduction Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1
More informationNoise Control Study. Proposed Mixed-use Development. 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa. Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments
Noise Control Study Proposed Mixed-use Development 112 Montreal Road City of Ottawa Prepared for: DCR Phoenix Developments August 2014 10-13081-001-N01 August 28, 2014 10-13081-001-N01 Michael Boucher
More informationACOUSTICS VENTILATION & OVERHEATING GUIDANCE AVOG. Anthony Chilton. ANC Conference 21 st June 2017
ACOUSTICS VENTILATION & OVERHEATING GUIDANCE AVOG Anthony Chilton ANC Conference 21 st June 2017 THE PROBLEM Ventilation is required to achieve good air quality and to mitigate overheating. But ventilation
More informationDun Laoghaire/Rathdown County Council. Longitude Festival 15 th to 17 th July Marlay Park, Dublin
Dun Laoghaire/Rathdown County Council Longitude Festival 15 th to 17 th July 2016 Marlay Park, Dublin Title: Reading Taken: Equipment Used: Prepared by: Noise Measurements Taken at Noise Sensitive locations
More informationPlace Vanier Édifice AEFO
Place Vanier Édifice AEFO Martineau Architecture Inc. + Smith Carter Architects & Engineers Inc. TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT 250 Montreal Road Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc. Prepared by Thomas Couper,
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MCGANN 9a LANDS BANK STREET LEITRIM DEVELOPMENT AREA
REPORT Project: 105202-5.2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MCGANN 9a LANDS - 4747 BANK STREET LEITRIM DEVELOPMENT AREA Prepared for Claridge Homes by IBI GROUP NOVEMBER 2017 IBI GROUP REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationBASELINE NOISE MEASUREMENTS Different Techniques Different Results
BASELINE NOISE MEASUREMENTS Different Techniques Different Results Assessment Type & Methodology? Individual Methodologies: BS 4142 PPG 24 BB93 CRTN/DMRB/Road Noise Insulation Regulations CRN/Railway &
More informationUAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD
UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD 23 Waterford Drive Telephone (613) 225-6362 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Facsimile (613) 225-3022 K2E 7V4 e-mail standen.ual@sympatico.ca website: http://www.urban-noise.ca 1.0 Background
More informationMonthly Noise Monitoring Assessment
Monthly Noise Monitoring Assessment Tomingley Gold Mine, December 2018 Prepared for: Tomingley Gold Operations Pty Limited December 2018 MAC160270RP28 Document Information Monthly Noise Monitoring Assessment
More informationTraffic Noise Assessment. 5 Orchard Drive. Stittsville, Ontario
Traffic Noise Assessment 5 Orchard Drive Stittsville, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-014 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Cody Campanale 1187 Bank Street, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3X7 Prepared By: Joshua Foster,
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Assessment Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario
Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment 807-825 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-086-TRAFFIC NOISE Prepared For: Anthony Nicolini 183 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 0M3 Prepared By: Michael
More informationTRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 20 MARK AVENUE
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 20 MARK AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for Prepared by Freefield Ltd. Issued: Postal Address:
More informationStrategic Mapping of Road Traffic Noise in Auckland, New Zealand
Strategic Mapping of Road Traffic Noise in Auckland, New Zealand Nick Henrys (1) (1) Resonate Acoustics ABSTRACT A model was developed to quantify road traffic noise levels and potential health effects
More informationRegulations and Standards
Regulations and Standards In Ireland, the principal law relating to noise and nuisance is Sections 106, 107, and 108 of Part VI of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Act 1992. Local Authorities
More informationTable of Contents... ii 1. Introduction... 1
316 Somerset Street East SACL Project #SW18098 April 05, 2018 Page ii Table of Contents Table of Contents... ii 1. Introduction... 1 2. Noise Sources... 1 3. Noise Assessment Criteria... 1 3.1 Surface
More informationWHAKATU ARTERIAL PROJECT ASSESSMENT OF NOISE AND VIBRATION EFFECTS
WHAKATU ARTERIAL PROJECT ASSESSMENT OF NOISE AND VIBRATION EFFECTS Report No 9462.2 May 2014 Prepared for: Prepared by:.... Hastings District Council Private Bag 9002 Hastings 4156 Rhys Hegley BE, CPEng,
More informationNoise Assessment & Control Transportation Noise Assessment 303 Lebreton Street South, 460 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario
Noise Assessment & Control Transportation Noise Assessment 303 Lebreton Street South, 460 St. Laurent Boulevard Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GmE 13-051 - Traffic Noise - Final Prepared For:
More informationREP Fotenn Bank Phase 1 Feasibility Noise Study with Building Component AmendmentPage 1 of 21
REP Fotenn 890-900 Bank Phase 1 Feasibility Noise Study with Building Component AmendmentPage 1 of 21 2018-02-28 Emilie Coyle, M.Pl Planner Fotenn Planning + Design 223 McLeod St, Ottawa, ON K2P 0Z8 Office:
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS
BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS FROM NEW AND UPGRADED NUMBERED HIGHWAYS April, 2014 Prepared for; B.C. Ministry of Transportation
More informationNew Zealand Transport Agency Building Acoustic Mitigation Case Study
Report New Zealand Transport Agency Building Acoustic Mitigation Case Study Prepared for New Zealand Transport Agency (Client) By Beca Ltd (Beca) 9 December 203 NZ Transport Agency Building Treatment Costing
More information671 Victoria Road North City of Guelph Traffic Noise Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited
671 Victoria Road North City of Guelph Traffic Noise Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited February 2016 Project Summary Project Number 152315 February 2016 Client 1830334 Ontario Limited Client
More informationTraffic Noise Assessment Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario
Traffic Noise Assessment 2140 Baseline Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-047 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Joey Theberge 905 Lady Ellen Place Ottawa, Ontario K1Z 5L5 Canada Prepared By: Omar Daher, B.Eng.,
More informationMAIN RESIDENTIAL ZONE RULES
Chapter 5 MAIN RESIDENTIAL ZONE RULES Introduction This chapter contains rules managing land uses in the. boundaries of this zone are shown on the planning maps. The All rules apply throughout the unless
More informationDecibell Consulting pty Ltd
db Decibell Consulting pty Ltd Aspire 16-66 Wesley Rd, Griffin REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT REPORT Prepared for Fairmont Group 23 rd January 2019 Decibell Report No. 1901251 Decibell Consulting Pty
More informationNoise Forum Conference 20 May The UK National Noise Incidence Study 2000/2001
Noise Forum Conference 20 May 2002 CIEH, Chadwick Court, 15 Hatfields, London SE1 8DJ The UK National Noise Incidence Study 2000/2001 C.J. Skinner & C.J. Grimwood, BRE, Watford, WD25 9XX 1 The UK National
More informationA review of the use of different noise prediction models for windfarms and the effects of meteorology
A review of the use of different noise prediction models for windfarms and the effects of meteorology G. Parry ACCON UK Limited, Unit B, Fronds Park, Frouds Lane, Aldermaston, RG7 4LH Reading, UK graham.parry@accon-uk.com
More informationWhite Paper. A guide to the acoustic performance of Smarts Systems Products. Building Regulations Document E Resistance to the passage of sound
White Paper. A guide to the acoustic performance of Smarts Systems Products. Building Regulations Document E Smart Systems Ltd. January 2007 Contents Building Regulations...4 Acoustic Performance - Overview...5
More informationStrategic noise mapping of Adelaide CBD
Strategic noise mapping of Adelaide CBD Valeri V. Lenchine 1, Jonathan Song 1 1 Science, Assessment & Planning Division, SA Environment Protection Authority, Adelaide, Australia ABSTRACT The Adelaide Central
More informationNoise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation excavation
PROCEEDINGS of the 22 nd International Congress on Acoustics Challenges and Solutions in Acoustical Measurement and Design: Paper ICA2016-552 Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation
More informationWAIKATO POWER PLANT SH31, KAWHIA ROAD OTOROHANGA ASSESSMENT OF NOISE EFFECTS
1/355 Manukau Road Epsom, Auckland 1023 PO Box 26283 Epsom, Auckland 1344 T: 09 638 8414 E: hegley@acoustics.co.nz WAIKATO POWER PLANT SH31, KAWHIA ROAD OTOROHANGA ASSESSMENT OF NOISE EFFECTS Report No
More informationNoise Impact Assessment. For Proposed Extension to Landfill Operations. Gowy Landfill Site Ince Lane Chester. For. FCC Environment
56a Leabrooks Road Somercotes Derbyshire DE55 4HB Tel No: 01773 607483 Fax No:01773 603331 e-mail: drk.nvc@btopenworld.com For Proposed At Gowy Landfill Site Ince Lane Chester For Report No.: R16.0605/DRK
More informationProof of Evidence on Noise Helene C S Evans BSc(Hons) MIOA MASA
Proof of Evidence on Noise Helene C S Evans BSc(Hons) MIOA MASA Appeal Ref No: APP/R0660/W/15/3027388 Cheshire East Application No: 14/0114M Hybrid planning proposal by Argonaught Holdings Ltd c/o LPC
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON
Environmental Noise Assessment 1020, 1024, 1028, 1032 & 1042 Sixth Line Oakville, ON Novus Reference No. 16-0173 Version No. 1.0 (Final) September 30, 2016 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, P.Eng.
More informationNoise Compliance Requirements for Distribution Transformers
Noise Compliance Requirements for Distribution Transformers 1. Brief description Guideline outlining acceptable placement of new distribution transformers to ensure compliance with the Environmental Protection
More informationMAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA
MAIN STREET PRECISE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STUDY REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA January 9, 2007 Prepared for: Valerie Young City of Redwood City 1107 Middlefield Road Redwood City, CA 94063 Prepared by: Richard
More information