Report of. Asbestos Survey

Transcription

1 Report of Asbestos Survey of Curtis Block and Marlowe Buildings 14501, 14505, 14509, & Detroit Avenue and 1412 Marlowe Avenue Lakewood, Ohio Prepared for City of Lakewood Detroit Avenue Lakewood, Ohio Prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road Cleveland, Ohio March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number:

2 March 30, 2016 City of Lakewood Department of Planning and Development Lakewood, OH Attention: Subject: Michelle Nochta City Planner Asbestos Survey Report Curtis Block and Marlowe Buildings 14501, 14505, 14509, & Detroit Ave. and1412 Marlowe Ave. Lakewood, Ohio PSI Project Number Dear Ms. Nochta, Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) performed the Survey of the abovereferenced property that you requested. PSI provided its services in general accordance with our agreement dated February 2, PSI thanks you for choosing us as your consultant for this project. Please contact us at if you have any questions or we may be of further service. Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Eric Oldroyd Sr. Environmental Technician James A. Inman Department Manager Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road Cleveland, Ohio Phone Fax

3 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF SERVICES PURPOSE AUTHORIZATION LIMITATIONS WARRANTY GENERAL BUILDING AND SURVEY INFORMATION BUILDING INFORMATION INSPECTION INFORMATION ACM METHODOLOGY RECORD DOCUMENT REVIEW VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES ASBESTOS SAMPLING PROCEDURES ASBESTOS ANALYSIS PROCEDURES FINDINGS RESULTS INACCESSIBLE AREAS NON-SUSPECT MATERIALS QUANTIFICATION REGULATORY GUIDELINES DEFINITIONS US-EPA OSHA OHIO EPA (OEPA) OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (ODH) CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS TABLES TABLE 1 SUSPECT ACM, MARLOWE BUILDING TABLE 2 SUSPECT ACM, CURTIS BLOCK BUILDING LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDI A LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT APPENDI B CHAIN OF CUSTODY APPENDI C SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING APPENDI D PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDI E INSPECTOR & LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

4 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: EECUTIVE SUMMARY Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) was retained by the City of Lakewood to conduct a demolition survey for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) at the Marlowe building and a renovation survey for ACM at the Curtis Block building. The project consists of an approximately 18,480 square foot (SF), two-story with basement, retail/apartment building (Curtis Block) and an approximately 2,688 SF, single-story on crawl space, retail/office building (Marlowe). The buildings were not occupied at the time of the survey. The purpose of the investigation and sampling was to provide general information regarding the presence, condition, and estimated quantity of accessible ACM located at the facility. The asbestos inspection and sampling was conducted on February, 23, 24 and March 20, A total of one hundred thirty-five (135) samples were collected from fiftyseven (57) homogenous areas (HA) of suspect building materials during the survey. The following samples from the survey identified eighteen (18) asbestos containing materials (>1% asbestos) during this investigation: Marlowe Building 03 9 x9 black floor tile 04 9 x9 red floor tile & associated black mastic 11 Black mastic associated with 12 x12 floor tile, brown stone pattern 13R Roofing materials 14 Exterior window glazing Curtis Block Building East side units 16 Ceiling plaster 17 Wall plaster 19 Adhesive, black; on tin roof between upper units 20 Adhesive, black; on fabric sealant for tin siding between upper units 35 Green floor tile, unit Tan floor tile, unit Red floor tile, unit basement 41 TSI pipe insulation, in wall cavities 56 Roof flashing Curtis Block Building West side units 31 Adhesive, black; associated with asphalt sheeting on porch 41 TSI pipe insulation, in wall cavities 1

5 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: TSI pipe insulation, unit basement 52 Brown floor tile, unit basement 54 Vapor barrier, under wood floor in units & Roof flashing The following materials were not sampled and are assumed to contain asbestos: Fire doors at Detroit Ave This summary does not contain all the information presented in the full report. The report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information. 2

6 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: SCOPE OF SERVICES 2 INTRODUCTION The scope of services for this project consisted of conducting an asbestos survey including inspection, sampling and analysis of accessible and exposed interior building and roofing materials at the subject facilities. The subject areas of the facilities for this investigation included the entire buildings, interior and exterior. The investigation included a visual inspection of the subject areas, sample collection, PLM sample analysis, quantification of ACM, report preparation and report review. 2.2 PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to provide general information for the subject buildings regarding the presence, condition, and quantity of accessible and exposed building materials that may contain asbestos. This asbestos survey was intended to meet the requirements of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). The survey included a thorough inspection of all accessible areas. 2.3 AUTHORIZATION Authorization to perform this work was given on February 2, 2016 by Michelle Nochta, City Planner for Lakewood, Ohio. The project was conducted in accordance with the scope, terms and conditions of PSI proposal number S. 2.4 LIMITATIONS Due to the continued use of the Curtis Block building, PSI was generally not able to conduct destructive sampling such as inside wall cavities or above plaster ceilings: therefore, the inspection was limited to areas that were accessible and exposed. Although PSI made an attempt to identify all areas of ACM, there may exist conditions which were unable to be identified within the scope of this survey. Destructive sampling was generally conducted at the Marlowe building to try to assess inaccessible or concealed materials. The inspector selected representative areas to perform an intrusive evaluation of void spaces within the building or structure. Such inspections were made by creating an opening of sufficient size to determine the presence, condition and quantity of suspect ACM within. Void spaces which were evaluated included locations of suspected pipe or HVAC chases, wall cavities where fireproofing or other ACM was suspected, above finished ceiling systems where ACM was likely to exist, within pipe trenches or within concealed locations. 3

7 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: Although PSI made an attempt to identify all areas of ACM, an exhaustive investigation of void spaces was not included in the scope of services for this project. Conditions may exist that were unknown or unable to be identified within the scope of this survey. Inaccessible is defined as areas of the building that were locked or where admittance was not permitted. It also includes areas/materials that could not be tested (sampled) without destruction of the structure or a portion of the structure, and areas/materials that could not be safely reached by the inspector or inspection team. In the event that access to a portion of the building was not obtained (which otherwise would have been tested), such limitations specifically are identified in the Findings Section of this report. PSI did not sample any system which presented a hazard to the inspection team such as energized electrical systems or within confined spaces. PSI did not collect samples from building elements where the intended use would be compromised by testing. 2.5 WARRANTY The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to determine the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM for the building structure. PSI warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with accepted professional practices at the time of its preparation as applied by professionals in the community. Changes in the state of the art or in pertinent regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report. The survey and analytical methods have been used to provide the client with information regarding the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM existing at the time of the inspection. Test results are valid only for the materials tested. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of the study or which were not apparent during the site visit. This inspection covered only those areas that were exposed and/or physically accessible to the Inspector. The study is also limited to the information available from the client at the time it was conducted. As directed by the client, PSI did not provide any service to investigate or detect the presence of moisture, mold or other biological contaminants in or around any structure, or any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the occurrence of the amplification of the same. Client acknowledges that mold is ubiquitous to the environment with mold amplification occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture. Client further acknowledges that site conditions are outside of PSI s control, and that mold amplification will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot and shall not be held responsible for the occurrence or recurrence of mold amplification. No other warrantees are implied or expressed. 4

8 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: GENERAL BUILDING AND SURVEY INFORMATION 3.1 BUILDING INFORMATION Site Address: Curtis Block East Side Units 14501, 14505, Detroit Avenue and second level residential units 1-3 Lakewood, Ohio Facility Construction Date: 1925 Previous Renovation Dates: Number of Floors: Estimated Square Footage: Construction Type: Unknown Two (2) with full basement 7,500 sq/ft Wood Frame and Brick Exterior Building Use: Three commercial units and three residential units on second floor Site Address: Curtis Block West Side Units & Detroit Avenue and second level residential units 4 & 5 Lakewood, Ohio Facility Construction Date: 1925 Previous Renovation Dates: Number of Floors: Estimated Square Footage: Construction Type: Building Use: Unknown Two (2) with full basement 4,900 sq/ft Wood Frame and Brick Exterior Two commercial units and two residential units on second floor Site Address: Marlowe Building 1412 Marlowe Avenue Lakewood, Ohio Facility Construction Date: 1922 Previous Renovation Dates: 1989 Number of Floors: One (1) with crawl space Estimated Square Footage: 2,688 sq/ft Construction Type: Wood Frame and Brick Exterior Building Use: Commercial 5

9 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: INSPECTION INFORMATION Asbestos Inspector: Eric Oldroyd State License # ES34798 James Inman State License # ES33832 Inspection Dates:

10 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: ACM SURVEY METHODOLOGY Inspection and sampling procedures were performed in general accordance with the guidelines published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA). The inspection and survey described below was performed by a US-EPA accredited inspectors and Ohio Department of Health (ODH) licensed Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialists. 4.1 RECORD DOCUMENT REVIEW Prior to conducting the visual inspection, PSI reviewed documents provided by the client for information regarding construction history and building materials. The following documents were reviewed as a part of this Asbestos Survey: No documents were provided. 4.2 VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES An initial building walkthrough was conducted to determine the presence of suspect ACM that were accessible and/ exposed. The inspection and sampling was limited to those areas and materials that were accessible and did not involve destruction of walls, other building elements, physical barriers, or the structural integrity of the item being tested. Although PSI made an attempt to identify all areas of ACM, there may exist conditions which were unable to be identified within the scope of this survey. Materials which were similar in color, texture, general appearance and which appear to have been installed at the same time were grouped in homogeneous sampling areas. Such materials are termed "homogeneous materials" by the US-EPA. During this walkthrough, the approximate locations of these homogeneous materials were noted. The inspector evaluated each suspect ACM to determine whether the material was friable or non-friable by touching the material, where practical. A friable material is defined as any material able to be crushed, crumbled, pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry. Each material was further assessed for overall condition. Conditions were rated as good, damaged or significantly damaged. PSI s inspector also identified the US-EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) classification of the material: Regulated asbestos containing material (RACM), Category I non-friable ACM, or Category II non-friable ACM based on the materials current condition. PSI s inspector provided estimated quantities of the materials positively identified as ACM based on materials that were accessible and exposed. 7

11 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: ASBESTOS SAMPLING PROCEDURES Following the walkthrough, the inspectors collected samples of suspect materials. US- EPA guidelines were used to determine the sampling protocol. Sample locations were chosen to be representative of the homogeneous sampling area. While an effort was made to collect samples randomly, samples were taken preferentially from areas which were the least visible to minimize disturbance of the material. Each sample location was sprayed with amended water and was kept wet during the entire sampling process. Samples were collected by coring through the material from the surface down to the base substrate. All layers of the material were extracted and placed into a sample container for transport to the laboratory. Sample containers were sealed and labeled with a unique sample identification number. Where appropriate, sampled materials were sealed with an encapsulant or covered with tape after sampling. PSI is not responsible for restoring the sampled areas to their pre-sampled condition. 4.4 ASBESTOS ANALYSIS PROCEDURES All samples were analyzed by PSI located at 850 Poplar Street in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The PSI Pittsburgh Asbestos Laboratory is a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) Accredited (# ) and an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Accredited (#8222) Laboratory. A copy of the Laboratory s Accreditation Certificate is included in the Appendix. The samples were analyzed for asbestos on a positive-stop basis by PLM in accordance with the EPA Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA/600/R-93/116 July 1993). Analysis was performed by using bulk samples for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples were mounted on slides and then analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, actinolite/tremolite), and fibrous nonasbestos constituents (mineral wool, fiberglass, cellulose, etc.). Asbestos was identified by refractive indices, morphology, color, pleochroism, birefringence, extinction characteristics, and signs of elongation. The same characteristics were used to identify the non-asbestos constituents. The microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample, using a stereoscope. 8

12 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: The US-EPA method allows samples which are visually determined to have 10% or less asbestos to be quantified using a Point Count procedure. An ocular reticule (cross hair or point array) is used to visually superimpose a point or points on the microscope field of view. A total of 400 points superimposed on either asbestos fibers or non-asbestos matrix material must be counted over at least eight different preparations of representative subsamples. If an asbestos fiber and matrix particle overlap so that a point is superimposed on their visual intersection, a point is scored for both categories. Point counting provides a quantification of the area percent asbestos. Point counted results supersede the results of the visual estimation. It should be noted that some ACM might not be accurately identified or quantified by PLM. As an example, the original fabrication of vinyl floor tiles routinely involved milling of asbestos fibers to extremely small sizes. As a result, these fibers may go undetected under the standard PLM method. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) is recommended for a more definitive analysis of these materials. Laboratory Quality Control Program The PSI Laboratory in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, maintains an in-house quality control program. This program involves blind reanalysis of ten percent of all samples, precision and accuracy controls, and use of standard bulk reference materials. In addition, the PSI Laboratory is accredited by NVLAP, which also has quality control procedures inherent in its program. 9

13 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: RESULTS 5 FINDINGS A total of one hundred thirty-five (135) samples were collected from fifty-seven (57) homogenous areas (HA) of suspect building materials during the survey. The following samples from the survey identified eighteen (18) asbestos containing materials (>1% asbestos) during this investigation: Marlowe Building 03 9 x9 black floor tile 04 9 x9 red floor tile & associated black mastic 11 Black mastic associated with 12 x12 floor tile, brown stone pattern 13R Roofing materials 14 Exterior window glazing Curtis Block Building East side units 16 Ceiling plaster 17 Wall plaster 19 Adhesive, black; on tin the roof between the upper units 20 Adhesive, black; on fabric sealant for tin siding between the upper units 35 Green floor tile, unit Tan floor tile, unit Red floor tile, unit basement 41 TSI pipe insulation, in wall cavities 56 Roof flashing Curtis Block Building West side units 31 Adhesive, black; associated with asphalt sheeting on porch 41 TSI pipe insulation, in wall cavities 46 TSI pipe insulation, unit basement 52 Brown floor tile, unit basement 54 Vapor barrier, under wood floor in units & Roof flashing The following materials were not sampled due to inaccessibility, safety concerns, or in order to avoid compromising their integrity, and are assumed to be ACM: Fire doors in Detroit Ave. 10

14 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: The laboratory analysis report, chain of custody, sample location drawing, material location drawing, photographs and certifications are included in the Appendices. Table 1 attached to this report lists the suspect ACM observed throughout the Marlowe building and Table 2 lists the suspect ACM observed throughout the Curtis block building. The tables list the suspect material sample ID#, general location, laboratory results, condition, friability, NESHAP category, and estimated quantity of ACM materials. 5.2 INACCESSIBLE AREAS These areas will require an asbestos inspection prior to any demolition or renovation activities within the areas. Curtis Block Building, Interior wall cavities Curtis Block East Side Building, materials under wood flooring 5.3 NON-SUSPECT MATERIALS The following materials were observed but are considered non-suspect ACM due to their composition and were not sampled. Wood, stone or metal components Concrete and masonry components Fiberglass pipe insulation 5.4 QUANTIFICATION Quantification of suspect ACM was conducted using visual estimation by a licensed asbestos inspector. This visual estimation was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the asbestos industry based on materials that were accessible and exposed. These values are sufficiently accurate for the purpose of documenting the presence of asbestos within its space for the purpose of identifying abatement control conditions or for general policy considerations. Actual quantities may differ between visually estimated values and physical measurements. If a licensed asbestos abatement contractor is engaged to remove asbestos containing materials, the abatement contractor is responsible for verifying reported quantities of ACM. 11

15 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: DEFINITIONS 6 REGULATORY GUIDELINES ACM - The US-EPA and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) consider a material to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample from the homogeneous area shows asbestos in an amount greater than 1%. Friable ACM - The US-EPA defines friable ACM as any ACM that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Point Count - If a material is found to contain 10% or less asbestos via visual estimation, it can be treated as non-asbestos-containing per US-EPA Regulations only if verified to contain 1% or less asbestos by the Point Count Quantification Procedure. If not point counted, a sample in which asbestos was visually detected and estimated (including trace to 1%) must be assumed to be greater than 1% and treated as ACM. Please refer to the laboratory analyses for a more detailed description of the microscopic analysis of individual samples. 6.2 US-EPA US-EPA classifies ACM into three categories: Category I Nonfriable (Cat I NF) includes asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering and asphalt roofing products Category II Nonfriable (Cat II NF) includes any ACM, excluding Category I NF, which cannot be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry Regulated ACM (RACM) means any friable ACM, including: Cat I NF ACM that has become friable Cat I NF ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading Cat II NF ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation activities. 6.3 OSHA OSHA requires all suspect materials to be analyzed by layer, even materials such as drywall/joint compound, which may sometimes be composited per the US-EPA. If any layer contains asbestos in a concentration >1%, the material is considered an ACM. 12

16 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: OSHA has a classification system (I thru IV) for ACM depending on the type of material and the disturbance. Briefly, Class I work is defined as activities involving the removal of ACM or presumed ACM (PACM) that is thermal system insulation (TSI) and surfacing materials. Class II activities involve removal of ACM/PACM other than TSI or surfacing material. Class III work includes repair and maintenance operations which are likely to disturb ACM/PACM, and Class IV work includes maintenance and custodial activities during which employees contact but do not disturb ACM/PACM. Materials where asbestos is detected, but where point counting is conducted and determined that the concentration is 1% asbestos, are not considered to be ACM by OSHA. However, these materials are considered unclassified asbestos work per OSHA. Some OSHA work control practices and prohibitions will still apply, with the extent depending on whether the worker s exposure to airborne asbestos exceeds the OSHA PEL. Additional details of the OSHA asbestos regulations related to the construction industry can be found in 29 CFR part OHIO EPA (OEPA) The OEPA regulations are consistent with the US-EPA s NESHAP standards with the exception of the following rule changes: Friable ACM: Any Cat I or Cat II ACM that becomes damaged from either deterioration or attempts at removal or abatement resulting in small fragments the size of four square inches or less shall be considered friable or RACM. Disposal: OEPA requires that in addition to RACM, all Cat II materials to be disposed of at a regulated asbestos landfill. 6.5 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (ODH) ODH governs asbestos certification and licensure in Ohio under Chapter 3710 of the Ohio Revised Code and Chapter of the Ohio Administrative Code. An Asbestos Hazard Abatement Activity is defined by ODH as any activity involving the removal, renovation, enclosure, repair or encapsulation of reasonably related friable ACM in an amount greater than fifty linear feet or fifty square feet. Asbestos Hazard Abatement Activities require: Abatement activities be conducted by a licensed Asbestos Hazard Abatement Contractor using licensed Asbestos Hazard Abatement Workers A written Asbestos Hazard Abatement Project Agreement A written Prior Notification of Asbestos Hazard Abatement form be submitted to ODH 10 business days prior to the start of any asbestos hazard abatement project 13

17 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report March 30, 2016 PSI Project Number: CONCLUSIONS 7 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) were identified at the subject site. Category I Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) were identified at the subject site. Assumed Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) were identified at the subject site. 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ACM should be maintained in a good, non-damaged condition and periodically inspected through use of an O&M program. Damaged or significantly damaged ACM should be repaired, encapsulated, enclosed or removed. RACM must be properly removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovations or demolition that would disturb the material. Federal, State and Local regulations and guidelines should be strictly adhered to when removing the ACM. In addition, prior to any future maintenance, renovation or demolition activities, any areas that were noted as being inaccessible during this project, or any concealed areas, such as wall cavities and ceiling plenums, where suspect ACM are discovered, will require testing or can be treated as assumed ACM unless tested and found to be non- ACM survey for ACM. The Ohio EPA regulations allows Category I non-friable and some Category II nonfriable ACM to remain in place during demolition, unless that material becomes damaged from either deterioration or attempts at removal or abatement resulting in small fragments the size of four square inches or less, which is considered RACM. RACM must be properly removed prior to demolition. If Category I non-friable ACM is not removed prior to demolition the generated debris cannot be recycled or used as clean-fill but may be disposed of at a construction and demolition landfill. If Category II non-friable ACM is not removed prior to demolition, the generate debris must be disposed of at an EPA approved asbestos waste disposal site. Materials verified to contain low concentrations of asbestos (trace to 1%) by the point count method are not considered ACM, and are not regulated by the US EPA; however, some OSHA regulations will still apply based on the employee s airborne exposure. 14

18 TABLES

19 Suspect ACM Tables March 30, 2016 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report PSI Project Number TABLE 1 MARLOWE BUILDING SUSPECT ACM HA & (Sample #)* Material Description General Material Location F / NF 1 Cond. 2 Asbestos Content 3 EPA NESHAP Cat 4 Estimated Quantity 01 (A-B) 02 (A-C) 2 x4 Suspended ceiling tile, pinhole & random fissures South side section - - NAD x4 Suspended ceiling tile, round & oblong holes North and center units - - NAD (A-B) 9 x9 Floor tile, black w/tan Mastic, black South side section NF Good 5% CH NAD CAT I 600 sf 04 (A-B) 9 x9 Floor tile, red Mastic, black South side front entrance NF Good 7% CH 5% CH CAT I 50 sf 05 (A-B) 06 (A-B) Vapor barrier, black Carpet mastic, yellow South and center section - - NAD - - North sections - - NAD (A) Plaster, white Texture, grey Walls, throughout - - NAD NAD (A-B) Plaster, white Plaster, grey Ceiling, throughout - - NAD <1% CH, PT (A-B) Drywall Joint compound South sections - - NAD (A-B) Drywall Joint compound North sections - - NAD - -

20 Suspect ACM Tables March 30, 2016 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report PSI Project Number HA & (Sample #)* Material Description General Material Location F / NF 1 Cond. 2 Asbestos Content 3 EPA NESHAP Cat 4 Estimated Quantity 11 (A-E) 12 x12 Floor tile, brown stone pattern Mastic, black South-center section NF good NAD CAT I 600 sf NF good 5% CH CAT I 600 sf 12 (A&B) Cove base, brown Adhesive, brown North sections - - NAD R (A-B) Roofing Roof NF Good 3% CH CAT I 2,400 sf 13F (A-B) 14 (A-B) Roof flashing Roof - - NAD - - Window glazing Exterior rear windows F Poor 2% CH RACM 4 ea. Notes: 1 F = Friable NF = Non-friable 2 Cond. = Condition of Materials 3 NAD = No Asbestos Detected CH = Chrysotile PT = Point Count 4 NESHAP Category RACM = Regulated ACM Cat I = Category I Non-Friable ACM Cat II = Category II Non-Friable ACM

21 Suspect ACM Tables March 30, 2016 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report PSI Project Number TABLE 2 CURTIS BLOCK BUILDING SUSPECT ACM HA & (Sample #)* Material Description General Material Location F / NF 1 Cond. 2 Asbestos Content 3 EPA NESHAP Cat 4 Estimated Quantity 15 (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, off-white w/grey blotch pattern Mastic, yellow Kitchen, Units #1, 2 & NAD (A-E) Plaster, grey East side units 2 nd floor, Plaster, white ceiling NF Good 3% CH NAD RACM 3,750 sf 17 Plaster, grey Plaster, white East side units, walls NF Good 3% CH NAD RACM 13,044 sf 18 (A&B) Mortar Behind fire place inserts Units #1,2 & (A&B) Adhesive, black Exterior on tin siding between units 1&2 and 2&3 F poor 5% CH RACM 420 sf 20 (A&B) Asphaltic coating, black On tin roofing between units 1&2 and 2&3 F Poor 5% CH RACM 210 sf 21 (A&B) Ceiling tile, 1 x1, white & textured finish 2 nd floor stairwells - - NAD A Cable housing, exterior On porch between 1 st & 2 nd floor - - NAD (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, Lt. brown w/pattern Mastic, yellow Kitchen, unit #3 - - NAD NAD (A-E) Plaster, grey Plaster, white West side units 2 nd floor, ceiling - - NAD NAD - -

22 Suspect ACM Tables March 30, 2016 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report PSI Project Number HA & (Sample #)* Material Description General Material Location F / NF 1 Cond. 2 Asbestos Content 3 EPA NESHAP Cat 4 Estimated Quantity 25 (A&B) Plaster, grey Plaster, white West side units, walls - <1% CH PT NAD (A&B) 27 (A&B) 28 (A&B) 2 x4 Suspended ceiling tile, white 12 x12 Floor tile. Yellow w/pattern Mastic, yellow Ceiling tile, 1 x1, white & smooth finish Living room, unit #4 - - NAD - - Kitchen, unit #4 - - NAD - - Kitchen, 2 nd level - - NAD (A&B) Window glazing West side units - - NAD (A&B) 2 x4 Suspended ceiling tile, white, pin & random holes Living room, unit #4 - - NAD (A&B) Rolled asphalt sheeting Adhesive, black West side porch NF Good NAD 5% CH CAT I 450 sf 32 (A&B) Window glazing East side units - - NAD (A&B) 34 (A&B) Ceiling tile, 1 x1, white & pinhole 12 x12 Floor tile, brown wood pattern Mastic, yellow #14501 entrance - - NAD - - #14501 front sales area - - NAD (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, green Mastic, black #14501 front sales area NF Good 7% CH NAD CAT I 1,010 sf

23 Suspect ACM Tables March 30, 2016 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report PSI Project Number HA & (Sample #)* Material Description General Material Location F / NF 1 Cond. 2 Asbestos Content 3 EPA NESHAP Cat 4 Estimated Quantity 36 (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, tan w/brown & white #14501 front sales area NF Good 5% CH CAT I 1,010 sf Mastic, black NAD 37 (A&B) Vapor barrier, black #14501 front sales area - - NAD (A&B) Cove base, brown Mastic, yellow #14501 front sales area - - NAD NAD (A&B) Drywall Joint compound #14501 basement - - NAD NAD (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, red Mastic, yellow #14501 basement, under carpet NF Good 3% CH NAD CAT I 400 sf 41 (A&B) Thermal system pipe wrap #14501 basement F Poor 50% CH RACM 5 lf (observed) 42 (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, maroon Mastic, yellow # NAD NAD (A&B) 2 x4 Suspended ceiling tile, white, pin & random fissures # NAD (A&B) Floor overlay, brown # NAD (A&B) Drywall Joint compound #14505 basement - - NAD NAD (A) Thermal system insulation, MAG #14509 basement F Poor NAD RACM 1 lf (observed) 47 (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, off-white w/tan pattern Mastic, yellow # NAD NAD - -

24 Suspect ACM Tables March 30, 2016 Curtis Block & Marlowe Buildings Survey Report PSI Project Number HA & (Sample #)* Material Description General Material Location F / NF 1 Cond. 2 Asbestos Content 3 EPA NESHAP Cat 4 Estimated Quantity 48 (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, off-white w/grey pattern Mastic, yellow #14511, first floor - - NAD NAD (A&B) Carpet mastic, yellow #14511, first floor - - NAD (A&B) Cove base, black Mastic, yellow #14511, first floor - - NAD (A&B) Drywall Joint compound #14511, first floor - - NAD (A&B) 12 x12 Floor tile, brown Mastic, yellow #14511, basement entrance NF Good 3% CH NAD CAT I 35 sf 53 (A&B) Drywall, no joint compound #14515 basement - - NAD (A&B) Vapor barrier, white #14515 & #14511 Under wood flooring F Good 50% CH RACM 2,500 sf 55 (A&B) 56 (A&B) 57 (A&B) Asphaltic roof materials Roofing - - NAD - - Asphaltic roof flashing Roof flashing NF Good 4% CH CAT I 2,000 sf Window Caulking Front Windows - - NAD - - Notes: 1 F = Friable NF = Non-friable 2 Cond. = Condition of Materials 3 NAD = No Asbestos Detected CH = Chrysotile PT = Point Count 4 NESHAP Category RACM = Regulated ACM Cat I = Category I Non-Friable ACM Cat II = Category II Non-Friable ACM

25 APPENDICES

26 APPENDI A LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT

27 TESTED FOR: REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS PSI, Inc 5555 Canal Road Cleveland, OH Attn: Eric Oldroyd Date Received: 2/29/2016 Date Completed: 3/7/2016 Project ID: Marlowe Building 1412 Marlowe, Lakewood Date Reported: 3/7/2016 Analyst: Preston Hunt Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 1 of 4 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 01A 001A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 10% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 60% Cellulose Fiber 01B 002A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 10% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 60% Cellulose Fiber 02A 003A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 40% Cellulose Fiber 02B 004A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 40% Cellulose Fiber 03A 005A (1) Black, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported (2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 03B 006A (1) Black, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported (2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 04A 007A (1) Red, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 7% Chrysotile None Reported (2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported 04B 008A Sample Not Tested 05A 009A (1) Black, Vapor Barrier, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 70% Cellulose Fiber 05B 010A (1) Black, Vapor Barrier, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 70% Cellulose Fiber Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

28 Analyst: PH Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 2 of 4 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 06A 011A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 06B 012A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 07A 013A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair No Texture 07B 014A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair (3) White, Texture, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 07C 015A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 07D 016A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair No Texture 07E 017A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 08A 018A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair No Texture 08B 019A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Hair < 1% Chrysotile No Texture 08C 020A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Hair < 1% Chrysotile No Texture Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

29 Analyst: PH Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 3 of 4 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 08D 021A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Hair < 1% Chrysotile No Texture 08E 022A (1) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Hair < 1% Chrysotile No Texture 09A 023A (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 09B 024A (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 10A 025A (1) Off-White, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 10B 026A (1) Off-White, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 11A 027A (1) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported 11B 028A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (3) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 12A 029A (1) Brown, Covebase, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Brown, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 12B 030A (1) Brown, Covebase, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Brown, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

30 Analyst: PH Work Order: Page: 4 of 4 Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 13RA 031A (1) Black, Roofing, Homogeneous 10% Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 3% Chrysotile 13RB 032A Sample Not Tested 13FA 033A (1) Black, Flashing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 13FB 034A (1) Black, Flashing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 14A 035A (1) Gray, Caulking, Homogeneous 2% Chrysotile None Reported 14B 036A Sample Not Tested Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

31 REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc Project ID: Canal Road Cleveland, OH Attn: Eric Oldroyd Marlowe Building 1412 Marlowe, Lakewood Original WO# Date Received: 3/24/2016 Date Completed: 3/25/2016 Date Reported: 3/25/2016 Analyst: Daniel Anderson Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 1 of 1 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 8B 001A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported 8C 002A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported 8D 003A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported 8E 004A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

32 TESTED FOR: REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS PSI, Inc 5555 Canal Road Cleveland, OH Attn: Eric Oldroyd Date Received: 2/29/2016 Date Completed: 3/4/2016 Project ID: Curtis Block 1412 Marlowe, Lakewood Date Reported: 3/4/2016 Analyst: Preston Hunt Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 1 of 8 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 15-A 001A (1) Off-White, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 15-B 002A (1) Off-White, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 16-A 003A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (3) White, Texture, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 16-B 004A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (3) White, Texture, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 16-C 005A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (3) White, Texture, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 16-D 006A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 16-E 007A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

33 Analyst: PH Work Order: Page: 2 of 8 Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 17-A 008A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 17-B 009A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 17-C 010A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 17-D 011A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 17-E 012A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 17-F 013A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 17-G 014A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 18-A 015A (1) Gray, Mortar, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 18-B 016A (1) Gray, Mortar, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 19-A 017A (1) Black, Adhesive, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported 19-B 018A (1) Black, Adhesive, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported 20-A 019A (1) Black, Coating, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 3% Cellulose Fiber 20-B 020A (1) Black, Coating, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

34 Analyst: PH Work Order: Page: 3 of 8 Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 21-A 021A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 100% Cellulose Fiber 21-B 022A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 100% Cellulose Fiber 22-A 023A (1) Gray, Other, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 30% Cotton Cable Housing 23-A 024A (1) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 23-B 025A (1) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 24-A 026A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 24-B 027A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 24-C 028A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 24-D 029A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 24-E 030A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 25-A 031A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

35 Analyst: PH Work Order: Page: 4 of 8 Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 25-B 032A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous 2% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 25-C 033A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% Chrysotile None Reported (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 25-D 034A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 25-E 035A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 2% Hair (2) White, Plaster, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Texture 26-A 036A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 40% Cellulose Fiber 26-B 037A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 40% Cellulose Fiber 27-A 038A (1) White, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 27-B 039A (1) White, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 28-A 040A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 100% Cellulose Fiber 28-B 041A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 100% Cellulose Fiber 29-A 042A (1) Gray, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 29-B 043A (1) Beige, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 30-A 044A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 40% Cellulose Fiber Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

36 Analyst: PH Work Order: Page: 5 of 8 Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 30-B 045A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 40% Cellulose Fiber 31-A 046A (1) Black, Roofing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Synthetic Fiber (2) Black, Adhesive, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported 31-B 047A (1) Black, Roofing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Synthetic Fiber (2) Black, Adhesive, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported 32-A 048A (1) Gray, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 32-B 049A (1) White, Glazing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 33-A 050A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 100% Cellulose Fiber 33-B 051A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 100% Cellulose Fiber 34-A 052A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (3) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 34-B 053A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (3) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 35-A 054A (1) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Green, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 7% Chrysotile None Reported (3) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 35-B 055A (1) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Green, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 7% Chrysotile None Reported (3) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 36-A 056A (1) Tan, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 2% Chrysotile None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported No Carpet Mastic or Black Mastic 36-B 057A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Tan, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 5% Chrysotile None Reported (3) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 37-A 058A (1) Black, Vapor Barrier, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 70% Cellulose Fiber Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

37 Analyst: PH Work Order: Page: 6 of 8 Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 37-B 059A (1) Black, Vapor Barrier, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 70% Cellulose Fiber 38-A 060A (1) Brown, Covebase, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 38-B 061A (1) Brown, Covebase, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 39-A 062A (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 39-B 063A (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 40-A 064A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Red, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (3) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 40-B 065A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Red, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (3) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 41-A 066A (1) Gray, Insulation, Homogeneous 20% Cellulose Fiber 50% Chrysotile 41-B 067A Sample Not Tested 42-A 068A (1) Purple, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 42-B 069A (1) Purple, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 43-A 070A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 40% Cellulose Fiber 43-B 071A (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 30% Fibrous Glass NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 40% Cellulose Fiber 44-A 072A (1) Brown, Flooring, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

38 Analyst: PH Work Order: Page: 7 of 8 Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 44-B 073A (1) Brown, Flooring, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber 45-A 074A (1) Gray, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 45-B 075A (1) Gray, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 46-A 076A (1) Gray, Insulation, Homogeneous 10% Cotton 70% Chrysotile 47-A 077A (1) Off-White, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 47-B 078A (1) Off-White, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 48-A 079A (1) Off-White, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 48-B 080A (1) Off-White, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 49-A 081A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 49-B 082A (1) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 50-A 083A (1) Black, Covebase, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 50-B 084A (1) Black, Covebase, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 51-A 085A (1) Gray, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 51-B 086A (1) Gray, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber (2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 52-A 087A (1) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

39 Analyst: PH Work Order: Page: 8 of 8 Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 52-B 088A (1) Brown, Floor Tile, Homogeneous 3% Chrysotile None Reported (2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 53-A 089A (1) Gray, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber 53-B 090A (1) Gray, Drywall, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber 54-A 091A (1) White, Vapor Barrier, Homogeneous 20% Cellulose Fiber 50% Chrysotile 54-B 092A Sample Not Tested Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

40 REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc Project ID: Canal Road Cleveland, OH Attn: Eric Oldroyd Curtis Block 1412 Marlowe, Lakewood Original WO# Date Received: 3/17/2016 Date Completed: 3/21/2016 Date Reported: 3/21/2016 Analyst: Daniel Anderson Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 1 of 1 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 25-B 001A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

41 TESTED FOR: REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS PSI, Inc 5555 Canal Road Cleveland, OH Attn: Eric Oldroyd Date Received: 3/21/2016 Date Completed: 3/23/2016 Project ID: Curtis Marlowe Date Reported: 3/23/2016 Analyst: DA Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 1 of 1 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 55A 001A (1) Black, Roofing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 55B 002A (1) Black, Roofing, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED 10% Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 56A 003A (1) Black, Flashing, Homogeneous 4% Chrysotile None Reported 56B 004A Sample Not Tested Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

42 REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc Project ID: Canal Road Cleveland, OH Attn: Eric Oldroyd Curtis Block 1412 Marlowe, Lakewood Original WO# Date Received: 3/23/2016 Date Completed: 3/24/2016 Date Reported: 3/24/2016 Analyst: Daniel Anderson Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 1 of 1 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 25-A 001A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported 25-C 002A (1) Gray, Plaster, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Mary Cantley Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

43 TESTED FOR: REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS PSI, Inc 5555 Canal Road Cleveland, OH Attn: Eric Oldroyd Date Received: 3/30/2016 Date Completed: 3/30/2016 Project ID: Marlowe Building Date Reported: 3/30/2016 Analyst:Dan Anderson Work Order: Client ID Lab ID (Layer) Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.) Analyst's Comment Asbestos Content (Percent and Type) Page: 1 of 1 Non-asbestos Fibers (Percent and Type) 57A 001A (1) Gray, Caulking, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported 57B 002A (1) Gray, Caulking, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A. Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code Respectfully submitted, PSI, Inc. Approved Signatory Melanie Smith Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Phone 412/ Fax 412/

44 APPENDI B CHAIN OF CUSTODY

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54 APPENDI C SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING

55 18a Stairwell 16b Bedroom 17a Bathroom 16a Kitchen Bedroom 15a 32a LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample location Unit #1 PROJECT NAME: CURTIS & MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. ONE

56 18b Shared Stairwell 16d Bathroom Bedroom 32b Kitchen 15b Bedroom LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample location Unit #2 PROJECT NAME: CURTIS & MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. TWO

57 Closet 17c Shared Stairwell Bedroom 16e 21a Bathroom 20b Bedroom Kitchen 17b 23a 22a LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample location Unit #3 PROJECT NAME: CURTIS & MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. THREE

58 Shared Stairwell 24b 25a Bathroom Bedroom 24a 26a 26b Kitchen 28a 27a 21b Bedroom 24d LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample location Unit #4 PROJECT NAME: CURTIS & MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. FOUR

59 Closet Shared Stairwell Bedroom 24c Bathroom 25b 30b 24e 30a Bedroom Kitchen LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample location 29a PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd Unit #5 PROJECT NAME: CURTIS & MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: DATE: DRAWING NO. FIVE

60 Basement Level First Floor 17e Stairwell 41a 40b Stairwell 34a 33a 40a 39a 39b 34b 35a 36a 37a 36b 38a N LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample ID & Location Detroit Ave. First floor and basement levels Notes: PROJECT NAME: CURTIS AND MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. SI

61 f Stairwell 44b 42a 36b N 17g 44a 42b LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample ID & location & Detroit Ave First Floor Levels Notes: PROJECT NAME: CURTIS AND MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. SEVEN

62 a Stairwell 45b 45a Furnace 41b LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample ID & location & Detroit Ave Basement Levels Notes: PROJECT NAME: CURTIS AND MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. EIGHT

63 b 50a 48a 48a 47a 51a 49b 50b 51b 48b LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample ID & location & Detroit Ave First Floor Levels Notes: PROJECT NAME: CURTIS AND MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. NINE

64 c 25c 54c 54a 25b 25d 53b 53a 52b 52a 29b LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample ID & location & Detroit Ave Basement Levels Notes: PROJECT NAME: CURTIS AND MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. TEN

65 N 1a 11b 3a 12b 5b 8a 4 a&b 2a 6b 12a 6a 8d 9b 2b 8b 9a 8e 10b 8c 7c 10a 7d 7b 7e 1b 7a 14b 14a LEGEND: Not to Scale = Sample ID & location 1412 Marlowe Ave Notes: PROJECT NAME: CURTIS AND MARLOWE PROJECT NO.: PROJECT MGR J. Inman DRAWN BY E. Oldroyd DATE: DRAWING NO. ELEVEN

66 APPENDI D PHOTOGRAPHS

67 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Marlowe Building Remarks: Sample ID# 03 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Marlowe Building Remarks: Sample ID# 04 Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

68 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Marlowe Building Remarks: Sample ID# 11 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Marlowe Building Remarks: Sample ID# 13R Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

69 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Marlowe Building Remarks: Sample ID# 14 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 16 Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

70 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 17 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 19 Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

71 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 20 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 31 Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

72 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 41 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 54 Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

73 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 52 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 36 Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

74 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 35 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Assumed asbestos containing fire door Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

75 Date of Photo: PSI Project No.: Client: City of Lakewood Project Name: Curtis-Marlowe Buildings Address: Curtis Block Building Remarks: Sample ID# 56 Professional Service Industries, Inc Canal Road, Cleveland, Ohio Phone (216) Fax (216)

76 APPENDI E INSPECTOR & LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

77

78

79

80

81

82

83 AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that PSI - Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Laboratory ID: along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA-LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories in the following: LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires: 04/01/2016 ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: 04/01/2016 ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires: 04/01/2016 FOOD Accreditation Expires: UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires: Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and AIHA-LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA- LAP, LLC website ( for the most current Scope. Gerald Schultz, CIH Chairperson, Analytical Accreditation Board Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC Revision 14: 03/26/2014 Date Issued: 03/31/2014

84 AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION PSI - Professional Service Industries, Inc. Laboratory ID: Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA Issue Date: 03/31/2014 The laboratory is approved for those specific field(s) of testing/methods listed in the table below. Clients are urged to verify the laboratory s current accreditation status for the particular field(s) of testing/methods, since these can change due to proficiency status, suspension and/or withdrawal of accreditation. Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Accreditation Program (IHLAP) Initial Accreditation Date: 03/01/1987 IHLAP Scope Category Field of Testing (FoT) Technology sub-type/ Detector Published Reference Method/Title of In-house Method Method Description or Analyte (for internal methods only) Asbestos/Fiber Microscopy Core Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) NIOSH 7400 A complete listing of currently accredited Industrial Hygiene laboratories is available on the AIHA-LAP, LLC website at: Effective: 03/12/ _Scope_IHLAP_2014_03_31 Page 1 of 1

85

86