HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT. Reconfigure Security Flight Sim Bldg 2048 Project Number: GJKZ

Transcription

1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT Reconfigure Security Flight Sim Bldg 2048 Project Number: AT FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE, WASHINGTON Contract.: FA D-B001 Task Order.: 0027 February 15, W Riverside Suite 860 Spokane WA t Asbestos & Lead Paint Surveys: Environmental Risk Management (509)

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Limited Asbestos Survey with Location Maps B. Limited Lead Paint Sampling with Location Maps C. Specification Section: Lead-Based Paint Removal & Related Work

3

4 Limited Asbestos Survey Building 2048 Flight Sim Reconfigure Security Project Fairchild Air Force Base Fairchild, Washington Project. GJKZ Project.: ERM By Environmental Risk Management 1324 Liberty Lake Road #231 Liberty Lake, Washington Phone: (509) February 5, 2013 Prepared for: ZBA Architecture 421 West Riverside Avenue, Suite 860 Spokane, WA 99201

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Purpose 2.2 Scope of Services 2.3 Authorization 2.4 Warranty 3.0 METHODOLOGY Inspection Procedure 3.2 Sampling Procedure 4.0 LABORATORY METHODOLOGY Method of Analysis-Asbestos 4.2 Laboratory Quality Assurance 5.0 ASBESTOS FINDINGS Asbestos Containing Materials 5.2 n-asbestos Materials APPENDIX Appendix A: Inspector Certifications Appendix B: Bulk Asbestos Analytical Results Appendix C: Sample Location Drawing

6 1.0 Executive Summary Environmental Risk Management was retained by ZBA Architecture to conduct a limited asbestos survey for the Building 2048 Flight Sim Reconfigure Security Project, located at Fairchild Air Force Base, in Fairchild, Washington. This future construction project will involve the replacement of all exterior windows and frames, exterior doors and frames, and exterior vents with openings larger that 96 sq. in. The report is to investigate all potentially hazardous materials in the immediate interior and exterior vicinity of each of these items. The survey was conducted on December 19, 21, 2012 and January 12, General Building Observations FAFB Building 2048 is a combination one-story and two-story commercial building built in two phases. The building is currently utilized as a fight training and flight simulation training facility. The survey included the inspection of the building interior and exterior for suspect asbestoscontaining materials that may be impacted during Reconfigure Security project activities. Building interior and exterior doors, windows, walls, vents and ceilings may be impacted during the security reconfiguration. The remainder of the building is excluded from the scope of this asbestos survey. The exterior of both Phase 1 and of the building is concrete panel. The roofs are corrugated metal panel. The window systems and entrance door systems are anodized aluminum. The service doors are steel in steel frames. The building interior consists of painted sheetrock walls and metal T-bar frame and drop-in ceiling tile ceiling systems. The floors are finished with a combination of vinyl floor tile and carpeting. The mechanical room interiors consist of painted sheetrock walls and ceilings with bare concrete floors. The flight sim area finishes consist of painted sheetrock walls and painted concrete floors. Asbestos Containing Materials The materials that were sampled and analyzed and found to contain asbestos consist of the following. FAFB Building 2048 Interior - Asbestos Containing Materials ne of the materials sampled from the building interior were found to contain asbestos. FAFB Building 2048 Exterior - Asbestos Containing Materials ne of the materials sampled from the building exterior were found to contain asbestos. Reference the Asbestos Findings section and the analytical appendix of this report for specific sample information. Signed, Kevin McCrink, AHERA/EPA Accredited Inspector # BIR Expires: 05/9/13. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

7 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Purpose The purpose of the asbestos survey was to provide information identifying the presence of exposed and/or accessible suspect building materials that commonly contain asbestos for removal prior to project area renovation. The building materials scheduled to be disturbed during the project were identified by FAFB Scope of Work: Reconfigure Security, Flight Simulator Building, Scope of Work The scope of work consisted of conducting a visual inspection and sampling survey in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR and NESHAPS 40 CFR part 61 guidelines to determine the presence of suspected asbestos containing building materials (ACBM) which were exposed and/or accessible. The bulk samples collected from the project area were analyzed at an accredited laboratory to determine the presence and concentrations of asbestos. 2.3 Authorization Authorization to perform this survey was given by ZBA Architecture on December 18, Warranty The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to determine the presence of expose and/or accessible suspect asbestos containing building materials in the building at the time of the inspection. Environmental Risk Management warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in the general accordance with accepted professional practices at the time of its preparation as applied by similar professionals in the industry. Changes in the state of the art or in applicable regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report. The survey and analytical methods have been used to provide the client with information regarding the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect asbestos containing building materials existing in the building at the time of the inspection. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which were not apparent during the site visit. This inspection covered only those areas that were exposed and/or accessible to the inspector. The investigation is also limited to the information available from the client at the time of the investigation. Should the scope of the reconfigure security project change, Environmental Risk Management recommends that an additional investigation, including but not limited to, a review of the revised scope of work, be performed to determine if asbestos-containing materials or suspect asbestos-containing materials will be impacted. other warranties are implied or expressed. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

8 3.0 Methodology 3.1 Inspection Procedures Kevin McCrink, AHERA accredited inspector # BIR conducted the asbestos survey. The initial inspection consisted of the inspector walking through the project area of the building in order to determine the general building lay out, draw a site sketch and to determine the presence of exposed and/or reasonably accessible suspect asbestos containing materials. The suspect materials were then grouped into homogenous material groups that were collected during the sampling phase. 3.2 Sampling Procedures Following the inspection phase, the materials that were identified and grouped into homogenous suspect asbestos materials were then sampled. The sampling was limited to those materials which were exposed and/or accessible and which did not require destructive access in order to sample. The sampling protocol followed was consistent with the guidelines set forth in OSHA 29 CFR and NESHAPS 40 part 61. Efforts were made to select random sampling locations, but preference was given to damaged or disturbed areas in order to minimize the damage to the building finished surfaces. The sampling and inspection was conducted in the least disruptive manor as possible to the suspect building materials. A copy of the Inspector s accreditation can be found in Appendix B. 4.0 Methodology 4.1 Method of Analysis The analysis of the bulk samples for asbestos was performed by EPA method 600/M The bulk samples were prepared for visual examination and identification by polarizing light microscopy. Following the preparation of the material on a glass slide the samples were analyzed for asbestos forms of chrysotile, crocidolite, anthophyllite, actinolite/tremolite, amosite and nonasbestos components that totaled 100 % of the sample volume. Asbestos and non-asbestos elements of each sample were identified utilizing, the unique optical properties associated with them. The identification consisted of identifying specific optical and physical characteristics that included refractive indices, color, pleochroism, birefringence, extinction angles, and sign of elongation and morphology. The volume percentage of each component in the sample was determined by visually estimating the percentage. 4.2 Laboratory Quality Assurance The asbestos bulk samples collected for the building in this project were sent to EMC Laboratories, Inc. located in Phoenix, Arizona for analysis. EMC Laboratories, Inc. is a NVLAP accredited analytical laboratory. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

9 5.0 Findings 5.1 Asbestos Containing Materials OSHA/EPA defines a material to be an asbestos containing material (ACM) in the material contains greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos. Multiple samples are collected and if one sample out of the homogenous sampling group is found to contain asbestos then the material is determined to be an asbestos containing material. Specific materials sampled for the Building 2048 Reconfigure Security Project that were found to contain asbestos and can be found in the following summary. FAFB Building 2048 Interior - Asbestos Containing Materials ne of the materials sampled from the building interior were found to contain asbestos. FAFB Building 2048 Exterior - Asbestos Containing Materials ne of the materials sampled from the building exterior were found to contain asbestos. With the building occupied during sampling activities, destructive wall cavity inspection was not performed as part of this work. With no asbestos found at other locations, it is not anticipated that these untested locations will contain any asbestos containing materials. However, the Renovation Contractor shall alert the Government to any suspicious material found and provide additional testing on such, as directed by the Government, prior to demolition activities in those areas continuing. 5.2 n-asbestos Containing Materials OSHA/EPA defines a material to be an asbestos containing material (ACM) in the material contains greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos. Multiple samples are collected and if one sample out of the homogenous sampling group is found to contain asbestos then the material is determined to be an asbestos containing material. Specific materials sampled for FAFB Building 2048 Reconfigure Security Project that were found not to contain asbestos and can be found in the following table. Material Location Phase 1 interior walls Phase 1 interior ceilings Material Description White sheetrock/ joint compound White/ beige 2x2 ceiling tile Sample Number 48-1 Friable Yes/ 4 Asbestos Type Condition Sheetrock: Joint compound: 48-2 Yes Ceiling tile: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

10 Interior window sills Phase 1 interior walls Phase 1 interior floors Phase 1 interior walls Phase 1 interior ceilings Phase 1 interior walls Phase 1 interior floors Phase 1 interior walls interior walls mechanical mezzanine doorway interior walls interior walls electrical room interior walls hydraulics Light blue interior window ledge formica/ glue White sheetrock/ joint compound Light gray w/ gray 12x12 floor tile/ black mastic Gray cove base/ tan mastic White/ beige 2x2 ceiling tile White sheetrock/ joint compound Light gray w/ gray 12x12 floor tile/ black mastic Gray cove base/ tan mastic White sheetrock/ joint compound Gray cove base/ tan mastic White sheetrock/ joint compound White sheetrock/ joint compound 48-3 Formica: Glue: 48-4 Sheetrock: Joint compound: 48-5 Floor tile: Mastic: 48-6 Cove base: Mastic: 48-7 Yes Ceiling tile: 48-8 Sheetrock: Joint compound: 48-9 Floor tile: Mastic: Cove base: Mastic: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Cove base: Mastic: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Sheetrock: Joint ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

11 room walls Flight Sim large door frame Flight Sim regular door frame Flight Sim large door interior walls interior walls interior ceilings interior floors interior walls interior walls interior ceilings interior walls main entrance interior floors interior walls White caulk White/ brown caulk White sheetrock/ joint compound White sheetrock/ joint compound White/ beige 2x2 ceiling tile Light gray w/ gray 12x12 floor tile/ tan mastic Gray cove base/ white mastic/ clear mastic White sheetrock/ joint compound White/ beige 2x2 ceiling tile White sheetrock/ joint compound Light gray w/ gray 12x12 floor tile/ tan mastic Gray cove base/ white mastic compound: Caulk: Caulk: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Yes Ceiling tile: Floor tile: Mastic: Cove base: Mastic: Mastic: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Yes Ceiling tile: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Floor tile: Mastic: Cove base: Mastic: 6 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

12 Phase 1 & 2 atrium area interior walls Mezzanine mechanical fresh air intake interior walls Mezzanine mechanical fresh air intake walls, 2 nd floor interior walls, 2 nd floor interior ceilings, 2 nd floor interior walls, 2 nd floor interior ceilings 2nd floor interior, small louver HVAC exterior duct Exterior wall cavities interior window seals, 1 st floor interior window seals, 2 nd floor interior window seals White sheetrock/ joint compound White sheetrock/ joint compound White sheetrock/ joint compound White sheetrock/ joint compound White/ beige 2x4 ceiling tile White sheetrock/ joint compound White/ beige 2x4 ceiling tile Sheetrock: Joint compound: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Yes Ceiling tile: Sheetrock: Joint compound: Yes Ceiling tile: Silver duct tape Duct tape: White plastic backing/ pink insulation Backing: Insulation: Black glass sealer Yes Glass sealer: Black glass sealer Yes Glass sealer: Black glass sealer Yes Glass sealer: 7 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

13 Phase 1 & 2 atrium area exterior anodized window seams Phase 1 exterior anodized door frame seams exterior anodized door frame seams Phase 1 exterior concrete wall to ground concrete expansion joints Phase 1 exterior concrete wall seams Phase 1 exterior door frame seams Phase 1 exterior door frame seams Phase 1 exterior door frame seams Phase 1 exterior large steel door steel panel seams Phase 1 exterior large steel door bottom ground caulk Phase 1 exterior door frame seams Phase 1 exterior building exterior to Black caulk Black caulk Black caulk Brown expansion joint Gray caulk Gray caulk Gray caulk White caulk/ gray foam Gray steel door panel caulk Tan ground caulk Yellow/orange expanding foam Gray caulk Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Expansion joint: Caulk: Caulk: Concrete: Caulk: Concrete: Caulk: Foam: Caulk: Caulk: Foam: Caulk: 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

14 ground concrete seams Phase 1 exterior concrete wall seams Phase 1 & 2 exterior atrium area at roof/wall seams exterior door frame seams exterior large HVAC intake louver seams exterior large HVAC intake louver seams exterior large HVAC intake louver seams exterior building to ground concrete seams exterior concrete wall seams exterior concrete wall seams exterior door frame seams exterior Flight sim door frame seams exterior flashing exterior small HVAC intake Gray caulk White caulk Brown/gray caulk Gray caulk White caulk Gray caulk Gray caulk Gray caulk Gray caulk Gray caulk Beige caulk Gray caulk Gray caulk Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

15 louver seams exterior concrete wall seams exterior, 2 nd floor window frame seams exterior window frame seams exterior main entrance exterior main entrance soffit exterior vent louver frame seams Gray caulk Gray caulk Brown/gray caulk Brown caulk White sheetrock Gray caulk Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Caulk: Sheetrock: Caulk: End of section. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

16 Appendix A Inspector s Certification Attachment E

17

18

19

20 Appendix B Asbestos Analytical Results Attachment E

21 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Mica 90% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, White/ Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 1% Mica Binder/Filler 99% x2 Ceiling Tile, White/ Beige ne Detected Mineral Wool Cellulose Fiber 50% 30% Perlite Binder/Filler 20% LAYER 1 Formica Window Ledge, Blue ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 75% Binder/Filler 25% LAYER 2 Glue, Yellow ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 5% Binder/Filler 95% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, White/ Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Mica Binder/Filler 99% Page 1 of 16

22 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report LAYER 1 ne Detected "x12" Floor Tile, Lt. Gray/Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Black ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 2% Binder/Filler 98% LAYER 1 ne Detected 48-6 Cove Base, Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Tan ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 1% Binder/Filler 99% x2 Ceiling Tile, White/ Beige/ Tan ne Detected Mineral Wool 50% Cellulose Fiber 30% Perlite Binder/Filler 20% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Mica 90% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, White/ Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 1% Mica Binder/Filler 99% Page 2 of 16

23 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report LAYER 1 ne Detected "x12" Floor Tile, Lt. Gray/Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Black ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 2% Binder/Filler 98% LAYER 1 ne Detected Cove Base, Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Tan ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Binder/Filler 99% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 2% Perlite Mica Binder/Filler 98% Page 3 of 16

24 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report LAYER 1 ne Detected Cove Base, Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Beige ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Binder/Filler 99% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 2% Perlite Mica Binder/Filler 98% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass 10% 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Perlite Mica Binder/Filler 99% Page 4 of 16

25 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report Caulk, White ne Detected Caulk, White/ Brown ne Detected LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass 10% 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 1% Perlite Mica Binder/Filler 99% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Perlite Mica Binder/Filler 99% Page 5 of 16

26 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report x2 Ceiling Tile, White/ Gray ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 45% Mineral Wool 40% Perlite Binder/Filler 15% LAYER 1 ne Detected "x12" Floor Tile, Lt. Gray/Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Tan ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Binder/Filler 99% LAYER 1 ne Detected Cove Base, Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Off White LAYER 3 Mastic, Clear ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Binder/Filler 99% ne Detected Silicone Page 6 of 16

27 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Perlite x2 Ceiling Tile, Gray ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 50% Mineral Wool 30% Perlite Binder/Filler 20% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass 10% 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Perlite Page 7 of 16

28 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report LAYER 1 ne Detected "x12" Floor Tile, Lt. Gray/Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Tan ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 1% Binder/Filler 99% LAYER 1 ne Detected Cove Base, Gray LAYER 2 Mastic, Off White ne Detected LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Perlite Binder/Filler 99% Page 8 of 16

29 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Fibrous Glass <1% Perlite Binder/Filler 99% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White te: Very small amount of compound ne Detected Perlite LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 10% Fibrous Glass 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Perlite Page 9 of 16

30 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report x4 Ceiling Tile, White/ Gray ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 50% Mineral Wool 25% Perlite Binder/Filler 25% LAYER 1 Sheetrock, White/ Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass 10% 2% Mica 88% LAYER 2 Joint Compound, Off White ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 1% Perlite Binder/Filler 99% x4 Ceiling Tile, White/ Gray ne Detected Cellulose Fiber Mineral Wool 50% 25% Perlite Binder/Filler 25% Duct Tape, Silver/Beige ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 25% Binder/Filler 75% LAYER 1 ne Detected Backing, White LAYER 2 Insulation, Pink ne Detected Fibrous Glass 98% 2% Page 10 of 16

31 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report Window Seal, Black ne Detected Window Seal, Black ne Detected Window Seal, Black ne Detected Caulk, Black/ Beige ne Detected Caulk, Black/ Beige ne Detected Caulk, Black/ Beige ne Detected Expansion Joint, Brown ne Detected Cellulose Fiber 80% Binder/Filler 20% Page 11 of 16

32 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report LAYER 1 ne Detected Concrete Panel Caulk, Gray/ Lt. Gray/ Cream LAYER 2 Concrete Panel, Gray ne Detected LAYER 1 ne Detected Door Caulk, Lt. Gray/ Cream LAYER 2 Concrete, Gray ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Binder/Filler 99% Door Panel Caulk, Gray/ Cream ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Binder/Filler 99% LAYER 1 ne Detected Caulk, White/ Off White LAYER 2 Foam, Gray ne Detected Foam Page 12 of 16

33 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report Caulk, White/ Off White ne Detected Caulk, Tan / White ne Detected Expanding Foam, Yellow/ Orange ne Detected Foam Caulk, Gray ne Detected Caulk, Gray/ Beige ne Detected Caulk, White/ Beige/ Tan ne Detected Door Caulk, Brown/ Gray ne Detected Page 13 of 16

34 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report Caulk, Gray ne Detected Silicone Caulk, White ne Detected LAYER 1 ne Detected Caulk, Gray/ Beige LAYER 2 Caulk, Black/ Beige ne Detected Caulk, Gray ne Detected Panel Caulk, Gray ne Detected Panel Caulk, Gray ne Detected Door Frame Caulk, Gray ne Detected Silicone Page 14 of 16

35 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report Door Frame Caulk, Beige ne Detected Cellulose Fiber <1% Binder/Filler 99% Flashing Caulk, Gray ne Detected Silicone Vent Caulk, Gray ne Detected Silicone Building Caulk, Gray ne Detected Window Caulk, Gray/ Beige ne Detected Window Frame Caulk, Brown/ ne Detected Gray Door Caulk, Brown/ Gray ne Detected Page 15 of 16

36 Client: ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MGMT Address: 1324 LIBERTY LAKE RD, 231 LIBERTY LAKE, WA Collected: 12/19/2012 Project Name: FAFB BLDG 2048 Address: RECONFIGURE SECURITY Lab ID Client ID Sample Location EMC LABS, INC S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ Phone: or Fax: (480) Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy Layer Name / Sample Description NVLAP# Job# / P.O. #: Date Received: 01/09/2013 Date Analyzed: 01/14/2013 Date Reported: 02/01/2013 EPA Method: EPA 600/M Submitted By: KEVIN McCRINK Collected By: Asbestos Detected Asbestos Type (%) Attachment E ERM n-asbestos Constituents Laboratory Report Sheetrock Exterior Soffit, White ne Detected Fibrous Glass 2% Cellulose Fiber 1% Mica Binder/Filler 97% Vent Caulk, Gray/ Beige ne Detected Analyst - Kurt Kettler Signatory - Lab Manager - Ken Scheske Distinctly stratified, easily separable layers of samples are analyzed as subsamples of the whole and are reported separately for each discernible layer. All analyses are derived from calibrated visual estimate and measured in area percent unless otherwise noted. The report applies to the standards or procedures identified and to the sample(s) tested. The test results are not necessarily indicated or representative of the qualities of the lot from which the sample was taken or of apparently identical or similar products, nor do they represent an ongoing quality assurance program unless so noted. These reports are for the exclusive use of the addressed client and that they will not be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes over our signature or in connection with our name without special written permission. The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval by our laboratory. The samples not destroyed in testing are retained a maximum of thirty days. The laboratory measurement of uncertainty for the test method is approximately less than 1 by area percent. Accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for selected test method for asbestos. The accreditation or any reports generated by this laboratory in no way constitutes or implies product certification, approval, or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. Polarized Light Microscopy may not be consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Page 16 of 16

37

38

39

40

41

42 Appendix C Sample Location Drawing Attachment E

43

44

45

46 Limited Lead Paint Sampling Building 2048 Flight Sim Reconfigure Security Project Fairchild Air Force Base Fairchild, Washington Project. GJKZ Project.: ERM By Environmental Risk Management 1324 Liberty Lake Road #231 Liberty Lake, Washington Phone: (509) February 5, 2013 Prepared for: ZBA Architecture 421 West Riverside Avenue, Suite 860 Spokane, WA 99201

47 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Purpose 2.2 Scope of services 2.3 Authorization 2.4 Warranty 3.0 METHODLOGY Inspection Procedure 3.2 Sampling Procedure 4.0 LEAD PAINT FINDINGS Total Lead Analysis of Paint Chip Samples CONCLUSIONS 6 APPENDIX Appendix A: Lead Paint Chip Analytical Results Appendix B: Lead Inspector Certification Appendix C: Lead Paint Component Photographs Appendix D: Lead Paint Sample Location Drawing

48 1.0 Project Summary Environmental Risk Management was retained by ZBA Architecture to conduct a limited lead paint sampling survey for the Building 2048 Flight Sim Reconfigure Security Project, located at Fairchild Air Force Base, in Fairchild, Washington. This future construction project will involve the replacement of all exterior windows and frames, exterior doors and frames, and exterior vents with openings larger that 96 sq. in. The report is to investigate all potentially hazardous materials in the immediate interior and exterior vicinity of each of these items. The survey was conducted on December 21, 2012 and January 3, General Building Observations FAFB Building 2048 is a combination one-story and two-story commercial building built in two phases. The building is currently utilized as a flight simulation training facility. The survey included the inspection of the building interior and exterior for suspect asbestoscontaining materials that may be impacted during Reconfigure Security Project activities. Building interior and exterior doors, windows, walls, vents and ceilings may be impacted during the security reconfiguration. The remainder of the building is excluded from the scope of this asbestos survey. The exterior of both Phase 1 and of the building is concrete panel. The roofs are corrugated metal panel. The window systems and entrance door systems are anodized aluminum. The service doors are steel in steel frames. The building interior consists of painted sheetrock walls and metal T-bar frame and drop-in ceiling tile ceiling systems. The floors are finished with a combination of vinyl floor tile and carpeting. The mechanical room interiors consist of painted sheetrock walls and ceilings with bare concrete floors. The flight sim area finishes consist of painted sheetrock walls and painted concrete floors. 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Purpose The purpose of the limited lead paint sampling was to provide information on the Building 2048 Flight Sim Reconfigure Security Project regarding the presence of paints containing lead in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Lead General Industry Standards: 29 CFR , OSHA s Lead in Construction 29 CFR and Washington Administration Code (WAC) General Occupational Health Standards: : Lead. 2.2 Scope of Work Paint chip samples were collected from the painted building components that may be disturbed during the Reconfigure Security Project for total lead analysis. The bulk paint chip samples collected were analyzed at an accredited laboratory to determine the presence and concentrations of lead in paint samples. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

49 2.3 Authorization Authorization to perform this survey was given by ZBA Architecture on December 18, Warranty The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to determine the presence of exposed and/or accessible suspect lead containing painted materials in the building at the time of the inspection. Environmental Risk Management warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in the general accordance with accepted professional practices at the time of its preparation as applied by similar professionals in the industry. Changes in the state of the art or in applicable regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report. The sampling and analytical methods have been used to provide the client with information regarding the presence of accessible and/or exposed lead-containing paints existing on the materials identified for disturbance at the time of the inspection. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which were not apparent during the site visit. This inspection covered only those areas that were exposed and/or accessible to the inspector. The investigation is also limited to the information available from the client at the time of the investigation. other warranties are implied or expressed. 3.0 Methodology 3.1 Method of Analysis-Lead The paint chip samples collected from FAFB Building 2048 were sent to EMC Labs, Inc. by proper chain-of-custody. The samples were prepared at the laboratory and analyzed by EPA method SW-846 Method 7420 utilizing flame atomic absorption to determine the total lead content. 3.2 Laboratory Quality Assurance The total lead paint samples collected for this project were sent to EMC Labs, Inc. located in Phoenix, Arizona. EMC Labs, Inc. is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). 4.0 Lead Paint Findings The American Society for Testing Materials defines lead paint as paint containing 2 parts per million of lead. The Consumer Products Safety Commission determined that paint with greater than 600 parts per million of lead may not be used in household applications. Such paint is still sold for marine and other uses. HUD defines lead paint as having greater than 1 microgram per square centimeter of surface or 0.5% by weight. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

50 OSHA and Sate of Washington Labor & Industries do not define lead paint based on content. Any detectable lead in paint makes it lead paint for purposes of complying with OSHA regulations to determine worker exposure under OSHA s Lead in Construction Standard: 29 CFR and Washington Administration Code (WAC) General Occupational Health Standards: : Lead. 4.1 Paint Chip Analysis Results The following table indicates the findings for the analysis of the paint chip samples collected from the FAFB Building 2048 Flight Sim Reconfigure Security Project materials identified for disturbance at the time of the inspection. Material Location Sample Number Pb Result in % by weight 3 Total Pb in P.P.M Detection Limit % by weight Off-white wall 48-Pb-1 BRL BRL 0.010% paint on Phase 1 interior sheetrock walls White wall 48-Pb-2 BRL BRL 0.010% paint on Phase 2 mechanical rooms interior sheetrock walls Off-white wall 48-Pb-3 BRL BRL 0.010% paint on Phase 2 office interior sheetrock walls Off-white wall 48-Pb-4 BRL BRL 0.011% paint on Phase 1 interior sheetrock walls Brick red 48-Pb % 100 p.p.m 0.010% paint on structural steel components including Phase 1 and Large Flight Sim doors Phase 1 48-Pb-6 BRL BRL 0.010% Yellow paint on exterior concrete Phase 1 Brown paint on exterior metal doors 48-Pb-7 BRL BRL 0.015% (detection limit exceeds 0.010%) Phase 1 48-Pb-8 BRL BRL 0.018% ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

51 Light brown paint on interior metal doors Phase 1 Brown paint on exterior metal door jambs Phase 1 Light brown paint on interior metal door jambs Phase 1 Brown/yellow paint on exterior of large stationary steel door Phase 1 Brown/yellow paint on exterior of large stationary steel door frame Phase 1 Yellow paint on exterior metal vents and vent flashing Phase 1 Yellow paint on exterior concrete Phase 1 Yellow paint on exterior concrete Brown paint on exterior metal doors Brown paint on exterior metal door jambs White/ brown paint on interior metal 4 (detection limit exceeds 0.010%) 48-Pb-9 BRL BRL 0.016% (detection limit exceeds 0.010%) 48-Pb-10 BRL BRL 0.041% (detection limit exceeds 0.010%) 48-Pb-11 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb-12 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb % 4,760 p.p.m 0.010% 48-Pb-14 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb-15 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb-16 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb-17 BRL BRL 0.014% (detection limit exceeds 0.010%) 48-Pb-18 BRL BRL 0.010% ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

52 doors White/ brown paint on interior metal door jambs Yellow paint on exterior flashing Tan paint on exterior of large stationary Flight Sim steel door Tan paint on exterior of large stationary Flight Sim steel door frame White/ brown paint on interior metal doors White/ brown paint on interior metal door jambs Yellow paint on exterior HVAC metal louver vents Yellow paint on exterior main entrance soffit White paint on interior vestibule main entrance walls Yellow paint on exterior concrete walls 48-Pb-19 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb-20 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb-21 BRL BRL 0.085% (detection limit exceeds 0.010%) 48-Pb-22 BRL BRL 0.024% (detection limit exceeds 0.010%) 48-Pb-23 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb-24 BRL BRL 0.012% (detection limit exceeds 0.010%) 48-Pb-25 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb-26 BRL BRL 0.010% 48-Pb % 160 p.p.m % 48-Pb-28 BRL BRL 0.010% 5 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

53 5.0 Conclusions Any paint analytical result above the 0.010% by weight detection limit or paint samples that do not meet the 0.010% by weight detection limit would require the employer to demonstrate worker health and safety from potential lead exposures. Based upon the analytical results for lead paint on this project, all painted metal surfaces should be treated as having lead paint present. The white wall paint in the main entrance vestibule should be treated as having lead paint present. Any contractor or employee that could potentially disturb or come in contact with lead-containing paints must adhere to the requirements of OSHA s Lead in Construction 29 CFR and Washington Administration Code (WAC) General Occupational Health Standards: : Lead. Any lead painted building component or debris generated from lead-containing painted surfaces must be assumed to be hazardous waste until properly characterized by performing sampling of the debris and submitting the sample to an accredited laboratory for Toxic Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP-Lead) to determine if the waste stream exceeds the regulatory limit of 5 parts per million (p.p.m.) leachable lead. If the analytical result for the debris exceeds the 5 p.p.m. leachable lead level, the debris is characterized as a hazardous waste and must be properly manifested, transported and disposed of as a hazardous waste. The Contractor may salvage metal building components with lead paint. The equipment must be sent to a properly licensed salvage company and the salvage company must be notified in writing of the presence of lead paint on the salvage components. Copies of signed acknowledgement documents must be submitted to the 92 CONS Contracting Officer. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT # ERM

54 Appendix A Lead Paint Chip Analytical Results Attachment E

55 EMC LABS, INC South 51 st Street, Suite B-109 / PHOENIX, ARIZONA / or / FAX emclab@emclabs.com LEAD (Pb) IN PAINT CHIP SAMPLES EMC SOP METHOD #L01/1 EPA SW-846 METHOD 7420 EMC LAB #: L47565 DATE RECEIVED: 01/09/13 CLIENT: Environmental Risk Mgmt REPORT DATE: 01/14/13 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 01/10/13 CLIENT ADDRESS: 1324 Liberty Lake Rd, 231 P.O. NO.: Liberty Lake, WA PROJECT NAME: FAFB Bldg 2048 Reconfigure Security PROJECT NO.: ERM EMC # L SAMPLE DATE /12 CLIENT SAMPLE # DESCRIPTION REPORTING LIMIT (%Pb by weight) %Pb BY WEIGHT 1 12/21 48-Pb-1 Off-White Wall Paint BRL 2 12/21 48-Pb-2 White Wall Paint BRL 3 12/21 48-Pb-3 Off-White Wall Paint BRL 4 12/21 48-Pb-4 Off-White Wall Paint BRL 5 12/21 48-Pb-5 Brick Red Structural Steel Paint /21 48-Pb-6 Yellow Exterior Wall Paint Phase I BRL 7 12/21 48-Pb-7 Brown Exterior Door Paint BRL 8 12/21 48-Pb-8 Lt. Brown Interior Door Paint BRL 9 12/21 48-Pb-9 Brown Exterior Door Jamb Paint BRL 10 12/21 48-Pb-10 Lt. Brown Interior Door Jamb Paint BRL ^ = Dilution Factor Changed * = Excessive Substrate May Bias Sample Results BRL = Below Reportable Limits # = Very Small Amount Of Sample Submitted, May Affect Result This report applies to the standards or procedures identified and to the samples tested only. The test results are not necessarily indicative or representative of the qualities of the lot from which the sample was taken or of apparently identical or similar products, nor do they represent an ongoing quality assurance program unless so noted. Unless otherwise noted, all quality control analyses for the samples noted above were within acceptable limits. Where it is noted that a sample with excessive substrate was submitted for laboratory analysis, such analysis may be biased. The lead content of such sample may, in actuality, be greater than reported. EMC makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the analysis of samples noted to have been submitted with excessive substrate. Resampling is recommended in such situations to verify original laboratory results. These reports are for the exclusive use of the addressed client and are rendered upon the condition that they will not be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes over our signature or in connection with our name without special written permission. Samples not destroyed in testing are retained a maximum of sixty (60) days. Rev. 11/30/08 ANALYST: Jason Thompson QA COORDINATOR: Kurt Kettler Page 1 of 3

56 EMC LABS, INC South 51 st Street, Suite B-109 / PHOENIX, ARIZONA / or / FAX emclab@emclabs.com LEAD (Pb) IN PAINT CHIP SAMPLES EMC SOP METHOD #L01/1 EPA SW-846 METHOD 7420 EMC LAB #: L47565 DATE RECEIVED: 01/09/13 CLIENT: Environmental Risk Mgmt REPORT DATE: 01/14/13 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 01/10/13 CLIENT ADDRESS: 1324 Liberty Lake Rd, 231 P.O. NO.: Liberty Lake, WA PROJECT NAME: FAFB Bldg 2048 Reconfigure Security PROJECT NO.: ERM EMC # L SAMPLE DATE /12 CLIENT SAMPLE # DESCRIPTION REPORTING LIMIT (%Pb by weight) %Pb BY WEIGHT 11 12/21 48-Pb-11 Brown / Yellow Steel Door Big S BRL 12 12/21 48-Pb-12 Brown / Yellow Steel Door Jamb Big S BRL 13 12/21 48-Pb-13 Yellow Paint on Steel Louver /21 48-Pb-14 Yellow Exterior Wall Paint BRL 15 12/21 48-Pb-15 Yellow Exterior Wall Paint BRL 16 12/21 48-Pb-16 Brown Exterior Steel Door Paint BRL 17 12/21 48-Pb-17 Brown Exterior Steel Door Jamb Paint BRL 18 12/21 48-Pb-18 White / Brown Interior Steel Door Paint BRL 19 12/21 48-Pb-19 White / Brown Interior Steel Door Jamb Paint BRL 20 12/21 48-Pb-20 Yellow Metal Flashing Paint BRL ^ = Dilution Factor Changed * = Excessive Substrate May Bias Sample Results BRL = Below Reportable Limits # = Very Small Amount Of Sample Submitted, May Affect Result This report applies to the standards or procedures identified and to the samples tested only. The test results are not necessarily indicative or representative of the qualities of the lot from which the sample was taken or of apparently identical or similar products, nor do they represent an ongoing quality assurance program unless so noted. Unless otherwise noted, all quality control analyses for the samples noted above were within acceptable limits. Where it is noted that a sample with excessive substrate was submitted for laboratory analysis, such analysis may be biased. The lead content of such sample may, in actuality, be greater than reported. EMC makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the analysis of samples noted to have been submitted with excessive substrate. Resampling is recommended in such situations to verify original laboratory results. These reports are for the exclusive use of the addressed client and are rendered upon the condition that they will not be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes over our signature or in connection with our name without special written permission. Samples not destroyed in testing are retained a maximum of sixty (60) days. Rev. 11/30/08 ANALYST: Jason Thompson QA COORDINATOR: Kurt Kettler Page 2 of 3

57 EMC LABS, INC South 51 st Street, Suite B-109 / PHOENIX, ARIZONA / or / FAX emclab@emclabs.com LEAD (Pb) IN PAINT CHIP SAMPLES EMC SOP METHOD #L01/1 EPA SW-846 METHOD 7420 EMC LAB #: L47565 DATE RECEIVED: 01/09/13 CLIENT: Environmental Risk Mgmt REPORT DATE: 01/14/13 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 01/10/13 CLIENT ADDRESS: 1324 Liberty Lake Rd, 231 P.O. NO.: Liberty Lake, WA PROJECT NAME: FAFB Bldg 2048 Reconfigure Security PROJECT NO.: ERM EMC # L SAMPLE DATE /12 CLIENT SAMPLE # DESCRIPTION REPORTING LIMIT (%Pb by weight) %Pb BY WEIGHT 21 12/21 48-Pb-21 Tan Exterior Steel Door Jamb Flight Sim BRL# 22 12/21 48-Pb-22 Tan Exterior Steel Door Jamb Flight Sim BRL 23 12/21 48-Pb-23 White / Brown Interior Steel Door Paint Flight Sim BRL 24 12/21 48-Pb-24 White / Brown Interior Steel Door Jamb Paint Flt. Sim BRL 25 12/21 48-Pb-25 Yellow Steel Louver Paint BRL 26 12/21 48-Pb-26 Yellow Exterior Entrance Paint BRL 27 12/21 48-Pb-27 White Main Entrance Wall Paint ^ = Dilution Factor Changed * = Excessive Substrate May Bias Sample Results BRL = Below Reportable Limits # = Very Small Amount Of Sample Submitted, May Affect Result This report applies to the standards or procedures identified and to the samples tested only. The test results are not necessarily indicative or representative of the qualities of the lot from which the sample was taken or of apparently identical or similar products, nor do they represent an ongoing quality assurance program unless so noted. Unless otherwise noted, all quality control analyses for the samples noted above were within acceptable limits. Where it is noted that a sample with excessive substrate was submitted for laboratory analysis, such analysis may be biased. The lead content of such sample may, in actuality, be greater than reported. EMC makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the analysis of samples noted to have been submitted with excessive substrate. Resampling is recommended in such situations to verify original laboratory results. These reports are for the exclusive use of the addressed client and are rendered upon the condition that they will not be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes over our signature or in connection with our name without special written permission. Samples not destroyed in testing are retained a maximum of sixty (60) days. Rev. 11/30/08 ANALYST: Jason Thompson QA COORDINATOR: Kurt Kettler Page 3 of 3

58 EMC LABS, INC South 51 st Street, Suite B-109 / PHOENIX, ARIZONA / or / FAX emclab@emclabs.com LEAD (Pb) IN PAINT CHIP SAMPLES EMC SOP METHOD #L01/1 EPA SW-846 METHOD 7420 EMC LAB #: L47739 DATE RECEIVED: 01/18/13 CLIENT: Environmental Risk Mgmt REPORT DATE: 01/23/13 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 01/21/13 CLIENT ADDRESS: 1324 Liberty Lake Rd, 231 P.O. NO.: Liberty Lake, WA PROJECT NAME: FAFB Bldg HVAC Energy Savings PROJECT NO.: ERM EMC # L SAMPLE DATE /13 CLIENT SAMPLE # DESCRIPTION REPORTING LIMIT (%Pb by weight) %Pb BY WEIGHT 1 01/03 48-Pb-28 Yellow Exterior Paint on Concrete BRL ^ = Dilution Factor Changed * = Excessive Substrate May Bias Sample Results BRL = Below Reportable Limits # = Very Small Amount Of Sample Submitted, May Affect Result This report applies to the standards or procedures identified and to the samples tested only. The test results are not necessarily indicative or representative of the qualities of the lot from which the sample was taken or of apparently identical or similar products, nor do they represent an ongoing quality assurance program unless so noted. Unless otherwise noted, all quality control analyses for the samples noted above were within acceptable limits. Where it is noted that a sample with excessive substrate was submitted for laboratory analysis, such analysis may be biased. The lead content of such sample may, in actuality, be greater than reported. EMC makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the analysis of samples noted to have been submitted with excessive substrate. Resampling is recommended in such situations to verify original laboratory results. These reports are for the exclusive use of the addressed client and are rendered upon the condition that they will not be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes over our signature or in connection with our name without special written permission. Samples not destroyed in testing are retained a maximum of sixty (60) days. Rev. 11/30/08 ANALYST: Jason Thompson QA COORDINATOR: Kurt Kettler Page 1 of 1

59

60

61

62 Appendix B Lead Inspector Certification Attachment E

63

64 Appendix C Lead Paint Component Photographs Attachment E

65 1. Brick red LBP on structural steel behind large HVAC louver. 2. Large HVAC louver. 3. LBP structural steel in Phase 1 large flight sim door system. 4. Assumed LBP on large flight sim door system exterior 5. LBP structural steel in large flight sim door interior. 6. LBP on Phase 1 louver exterior.

66 7. Lead paint on main entrance interior walls. 8. Typical view of assumed LBP on Bldg door systems. 9. Typical view of assumed LBP on Bldg interior door systems. 10. Typical view of assumed LBP on Bldg exterior metal surfaces. 11. Typical view of assumed LBP on Bldg exterior metal surfaces. 12. Typical view of assumed LBP on Bldg exterior metal surfaces.