Charter Change. TheBurning Issues

Transcription

1 Charter Change TheBurning Issues By: Fr. Joaquin G. Bernas, S.J. Forum on Charter Change: CHACHA for what and for whom? Organized by: PASCRES, C4CC,PHILCOS and AKBAYAN 27 April 2006, Institute of Social Order, Ateneo de Manila University

2 Two Kinds of Change Amendment Revision

3 Three agents of Change Constitutional Convention Congress Initiative and Referendum (I shall come back to these)

4 The Controverted Issues Should we move from presidential to parliamentary? Should we move from bicameral to unicameral? If so, how is it to be achieved? Shelved for the moment: Federalism

5 The Forms Being Proposed As gathered from current drafts being considered

6 Parliamentary v Presidential Two Ways of Horizontal Sharing Power

7 Presidential Division of powers among of President, Congress and Courts Theoretically equal but President is dominant Fixed term Elected at large We have had it since turn of the century

8 Parliamentary System Supremacy of an elected Parliament Members elected by Districts Elects Prime Minister All or most of Cabinet are Members May recommend removal of Prime Minister

9 The Parliament The Prime Minister The Cabinet The President Main Actors

10 Membership Term of Members Qualifications Disqualifications Unicameral or Bicameral The Parliament

11 Role of Parliament Makes laws; overrides veto Chooses/fires Prime Minister Chooses Cabinet Judge of Impeachment Forms Electoral Tribunal, Commission on Impeachment, Commission on Appointments

12 Same as now Rules of Procedure

13 How chosen Qualifications Term The Prime Minister

14 The No Confidence Vote Grounds Procedure The Prime Minister s Response

15 Powers of Prime Minister He is Chief Executive with same Powers as President now May veto bills Appoints and heads Cabinet Accountable to parliament Representative to international orgs

16 Appointed by resident Assists the President The Cabinet

17 Qualifications Head of government Largely ceremonial The President

18 Role of Political Parties Decides party leadership Majority party decides head of government Minority party fiscalizes

19 Advantages of Parliamentarism Avoids gridlock between legislature and executive Easier to change head of government NOTE: Parliamentarism requires a working political party system.

20 Vertical Division of Power Unitary: Central government holds all Federal: Power divided between central and local governments Confederation: Agreement for specific tasks. E.g., EU

21 Traditional Unitarism Power concentrated in central gov t We had this until 1987 Local governments only had delegated powers Therefore removable by central gov t

22 Mitigated Unitarism: 1987 Limited constitutional empowerment of local governments Encouragement of local autonomy Two Autonomous regions authorized Power of local taxation

23 Federalism in general What is federalism? Vertical sharing of power. What basic principle underlies federalism? Subsidiarity

24 Who exercises what? Federal: interstate relations, matters national in scope, foreign relations: CONCRETELY: defense, foreign affairs, currency, customs, federal budget and taxes,immigration, citizenship, national territory

25 Who exercises what? States usually have the following: Local government, state budget and taxes, education, law and order, state level planning, public works, environment, natural resources.

26 Who exercises what? Possible concurrent powers: Agriculture and fisheries, energy, trade and industry, tourism, labor and employment, communication, science and technology, culture, social welfare and development.

27 How Federalism Arises By coming together United States, Switzerland, Australia By splitting and holding together India, Belgium, Canada, Spain

28 What holds them together? A Federal Constitution superior to state constitutions.

29 Culture and language Geographic contiguity Economic viability Criteria for Division

30 Form of federal government Either parliamentary or presidential Either unicameral or bicameral

31 How Divide Nation into States? 3: Luzon, Visayas, Mindanao 5: Luzon, Visayas, Mindanao, Bangsa Moro, Cordilleras 7: South Luzon, Central Luzon, North Luzon, Visayas, North Mindanao, South Mindanao 12: The existing Administrative Regions

32 Supposed Benefits of Federalism Empowerment of local communities Motivating local communities Accountability of local officials Hastening of development

33 ????? When Will it Come, Or Will it Come?

34 How Change Happens: The 1987 Text Section 1. Any amendment to, or revision of, this Constitution may be proposed by: (1) The Congress, upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members; or (2) A constitutional convention. Sec. 2. Amendments to this Constitution may likewise be directly proposed by the people through initiative and referendum..

35 Constitutional Convention How formed: Congress calls it by a vote of 2/3 of all its Members. Members of Con Con are elected They propose eithr amendmens or revision What was it like in 1971? Will we have a Constitutional Convention?

36 Congress as Constituent Assembly May propose amendment or revision by a vote of 3/4 of all its members Do the two Hose vote jointly or separately? What are the chances that this can happen?

37 Intitiative and Referendum: Two Steps A power for the people, not government Initiative: (1) formulation of the proposed amendment and (2) gathering of signatures Number of signatures needed: 3% of registered voters in a district and 12% nationwide. Only amendments, and not revision, may be proposed.

38 Obstacles to Initiative and Referendum No enabling law. (Santiago v Comelec) May propose only amendments and not revision. Switching to parliamentary system from presidential system is a revision.

39 Moral Issues in Current Signature Campaign Initiative belongs to the people, not to government. Lack of information on what is being offered. Parliamentary system is being touted as panacea for our ills, but no indication of how. Who will really benefit from the change?

40 When Changes Take Effect When ratified by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite called for the purpose The strange case of the 1973 Constitution A product of fait accomplie