Contents. Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek
|
|
- Fay Moody
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek Contents SITE LOCATION / DESCRIPTION... 3 WESTPOINTE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN... 3 THE ENCLAVE AT WESTPOINTE DETENTION POND... 3 Table 1 Constructed Detention Pond Elevation Storage... 4 Table 2 Design Detention Pond Elevation Storage... 4 THE ENCLAVE AT WESTPOINTE WEST DETENTION POND... 5 OAK RUN PKWY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS... 6 Table 3 Oak Run Pkwy Cross Section Summary Table... 7 HUNTERS TRAIL DRAINAGE ANALYSIS... 7 Table 4 Hunters Trail Cul de Sac Summary Table... 7 DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS... 8 Table 5 Drainage Easement Cross Section Capacity Summary Table... 8 HUNTERS CREEK DRAINAGE ANALYSIS... 8 CONCLUSION... 9 RECOMMENDATIONS... 9 P a g e 1
3 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT A EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA EXHIBIT (FROM WESTPOINTE DRAINAGE REPORT) ATTACHMENT B PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA EXHIBIT (FROM WESTPOINTE DRAINAGE REPORT) ATTACHMENT C DRAINAGE AREA AERIAL EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT D EXISTING SWALE HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS ATTACHMENT E OAK RUN PKWY EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT F OAK RUN PKWY FLOW DISTRIBUTION EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT G OAK RUN PKWY CROSS SECTIONS ATTACHMENT H HUNTERS TRAIL EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT I HUNTERS CREEK DR EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT J HUNTERS CREEK DR CULVERT MODEL OUTPUT EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT K DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT L DRAINAGE EASEMENT CROSS SECTION EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT M DRAINAGE EASEMENT CROSS SECTIONS MODEL OUTPUT ATTACHMENT N PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST OAK RUN PKWY ATTACHMENT O THE ENCLAVE WEST DETENTION POND DRAINAGE EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT P PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST THE ENCLAVE WEST POND P a g e 2
4 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek SITE LOCATION / DESCRIPTION Moeller & Associates has been retained by the City of New Braunfels to provide professional engineering services for the analysis of the drainage conditions at the location of the recently constructed detention facility for the Westpointe development adjacent to Hunters Creek Subdivision located in New Braunfels, Texas. The detention facility was designed by Pape- Dawson Engineers. The hydrologic and hydraulic computations were provided in the Westpointe Stormwater Management Plan dated March 31, In addition to the analysis above, this study is needed to analyze Oak Run Pkwy near the entry of Hunters Creek Subdivision, the culvert crossings of Hunters Creek Drive, the drainage issues associated with the cul-de-sac of Hunters Trail (Lot 39 in particular), and the capacities of the existing drainage easements within the subdivision. Ultimately, the goal is to provide the City of New Braunfels with recommendations on what improvements could be implemented to improve the current state of the drainage faculties of the area described. WESTPOINTE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN According to the Existing Drainage Areas exhibit (see Attachment A), Drainage Area A was analyzed, specifically discharges at Calculation Point 1. The western limits of the drainage area follow the eastern border of the Hunters Creek Subdivision, along an existing small swale and berm on the topographic contour map. The drainage area limit follows this berm northeast for approximately 1200 linear feet until the swale is no longer detectable on the 2ft contour map. The peak storm flow rates were calculated using the SCS method. The existing conditions peak flow rates for the 10-year and 100-year storm events were 99.6 cfs and cfs respectively. The proposed conditions, including the detention pond, are 99.3 cfs and cfs for the respective 10-year and 100-year storm events. THE ENCLAVE AT WESTPOINTE DETENTION POND After review of the constructed improvements associated with the construction of Oak Run Pkwy and the Westpointe Stormwater Management Plan, we have determined that, based on the topographic survey, the detention pond was constructed as designed. The tables below show the Elevation Storage values for the constructed Detention Pond and the design Elevation Storage values. The constructed pond provides 90% of the design volume. Our determination for the loss of 10% is due to the washout of a portion of the outfall weir and sedimentation within the pond itself. P a g e 3
5 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek Table 1 Constructed Detention Pond Elevation Storage Constructed Detention Pond Elevation - Storage Elevation dh (ft) Area (ft 2 ) dv (ac-ft) Cumulative V (ac-ft) Cumulative V (ft 3 ) Table 2 Design Detention Pond Elevation Storage Design Detention Pond Elevation - Storage Elevation dh (ft) Area (ft 2 ) dv (ac-ft) Cumulative V (ac-ft) Cumulative V (ft 3 ) P a g e 4
6 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek After reviewing the drainage area boundary for Drainage Area A, it is our opinion, that the Drainage Area A is larger than the actual drainage area conveyed to Calculation Point 1. The Drainage Area Aerial Exhibit (see Attachment C) delineates, in our opinion, a more accurate area discharging to Calculation Point 1. The area delineated in the Westpointe Stormwater Management Plan for Drainage Area A was acres and the new drainage area is acres (approx. 66% of the original total). The reasoning for reducing the drainage area is due to the lack of capacity in the existing swale. The capacity of the existing swale is approx. 7.4 cfs (see Attachment B for calculations). The capacity of the swale is exceeded for the 10-year and 100- year storm events, and in our opinion, the storm water upstream of the swale runs over the swale and berm and into the lots of the Hunters Creek Subdivision, and is not conveyed to Calculation Point 1. The construction of Oak Run Parkway created a dam within Drainage Area A. Runoff falling on the new Oak Run Parkway and upstream of Oak Run, is now conveyed in an underground system to the new detention pond, eliminating any runoff that previously may have by-passed Calculation Point 1. Through the coordination of this report with The Enclave at Westpointe Development, the detention pond was been reconstructed to allow a discharge of 30 cfs during the 100-year storm event. The pond has been constructed and the volume has been verified. THE ENCLAVE AT WESTPOINTE WEST DETENTION POND An additional detention pond has been constructed which discharges into an variable width drainage easement west of the detention pond mentioned in the previous section of this report. There is an existing privacy fence immediately downstream of the outfall structure. This area was studied in order to identify solutions to convey the runoff leaving the detention pond downstream into the existing low on the western portion of 356 Hunters Trace. This is due to the lack of capacity in the existing drainage easements described later in this report. Two options were identified: Option 1 (shown in red on Attachment O) Consisted of constructing approximately 800ft of underground storm drain through the existing easement through properties 438, 443, 449, and 455 Hunters Trophy and discharging into the existing low on 356 Hunters Trace. Option 2 (shown in blue on Attachment O) Consisted of constructing approximately 1000 ft of underground storm drain along the property line in the Enclave at Westpointe, collecting the discharge from the East Detention Pond, and running north within the P a g e 5
7 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek existing drainage easement on 339 Hunters Trace, and discharging into the existing low on 356 Hunters Trace. From an engineering standpoint, Option 2 is a more desirable option since the alignment is less disruptive to multiple private properties. The long term maintenance of this underground line would be easier since it is outside of existing yards and the alignment is more defined. Also, option 2 allows the storm water from the East Detention pond to be conveyed underground and discharged into an easement with adequate capacity. OAK RUN PKWY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Oak Run Parkway was studied from Hunters Trail to Hunters Trace. See Attachment E for the drainage area and cross section locations. The Westpointe Development construction plans for the extension of Oak Run Pkwy included the construction of four (2-30ft and 2-10ft) on-grade curb inlets. These curb inlets were designed to intercept the 25-year storm event flow rates. The extent of the study of Oak Run Pkwy proceeded under the assumption that the 10-year and 25-year storm events were completely intercepted and do not enter the original portion of Oak Run Pkwy. After review of the Westpointe Stormwater Management Plan, during the 100- year storm event, a total of 13 cfs bypasses the curb inlets (approx. 6 cfs on the west side of the roadway and 7 cfs on the east side of the roadway). The Gardens of Hunters Creek detention pond is located on the east side of Oak Run Pkwy and approximately 230ft south of the intersection at Hunters Creek Dr. The detention pond was designed to detain for the 10-year and 25-year storm events. However, after reviewing the outfall structure, the controlled release can only detain the 10-year storm event. Based on the preliminary analysis, storm events more intense than the 10-year storm, overtop the weir and enter Oak Run Pkwy un-controlled. A detailed analysis of the detention pond was not within the scope of this study. However, the assumption was made that the detention pond can reduce the peak flow by 25 cfs, which is the approximate reduction in flow rates in the 10-year storm event under the original design dated April 2, For the intent of this study, the 25-year and 100-year flow rates for the Gardens of Hunters Creek detention pond are approximately 84 cfs and 126 cfs, respectively. The amount entering Oak Run Pkwy during these storm events is assumed to be 59 cfs for the 25-year storm event and 101 cfs in the 100-year storm event. When coupled with the bypass flow (in the 100- year storm event only), the additional runoff entering Oak Run Pkwy is approximately 59cfs in the 25-year and 114 cfs in the 100-year storm event. See Attachment F for Oak Run Pkwy Flow Distribution Exhibit. The standard City drainage ordinance requires that the 10-year storm event be conveyed in within the curb of the roadway, and the 100-year storm event be conveyed within the right of P a g e 6
8 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek way. The improvements constructed on 311 Hunters Creek and 308 Hunters Trace are below the top of curb height as shown in cross sections 1 and 2. Therefore once the conveyance capacity within the curb is exceeded, the right of way cannot convey any additional flow and the runoff enters the lots. The capacities at Cross Sections 1 and 2 are approximately 63.35cfs and 93.54cfs, respectively. The reason for the higher capacity upstream is due to the longitudinal slope of Oak Run Pkwy, at Cross Section 1 slope is 1.86% and 3.7% at Cross Section 2. Table 3 below shows the approximate flow rates at Cross Sections 1 and 2. Table 3 Oak Run Pkwy Cross Section Summary Table Cross Section Capacity (cfs) Q 10 (cfs) Q 25 (cfs) Q 100 (cfs) The existing configuration of Oak Run Pkwy at Cross Section 1 can convey the 10-year storm event within the curb, and Cross Section 2 can convey the 25-year storm event within the curb. HUNTERS TRAIL DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Hunters Trail was studied to determine the capacity of the curb opening at the south end of the cul-de-sac, as well as conveyance ability to the curb opening, also during high storm events, Lot 39 (64 Hunters Trail) has expressed concerns regarding heavy erosion along the southern property line. See Attachment H Hunters Trail Exhibit for the location of the curb opening and the contributing drainage area. A portion of the runoff in Oak Run Pkwy is routed west on Hunters Creek Dr. The capacity of the street on the east side of Oak Run Pkwy is cfs. Therefore, in our opinion, the remainder will either overtop the curb on the west side, or will be routed down Hunters Creek Dr. Table 4 Hunters Trail Cul de Sac Summary Table Analysis Point Capacity (cfs) Q 10 (cfs) Q 25 (cfs) Q 100 (cfs) 30ft Curb Opening Note: Capacity of 30ft curb opening was calculated assuming a depth of 6. There are two existing driveways (64 and 71 Hunters Trail) that are directly in-line with the flow path of the runoff as the storm water flows west on Hunters Trail. The driveway cuts are 1 to 2 above of the gutter elevation and then drain west back in to the lots. The existing longitudinal slope of Hunters Trail is approximately 3.0%, and the storm water makes a 60 P a g e 7
9 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek degree turn to enter the 30ft curb opening. Considering the minimum capacity in the gutter at the driveway locations and coupled with the street grade and 60 degree turn, momentum of the storm water in higher storm events, will likely carry the runoff into lots where the runoff is uncontrolled. DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The existing drainage easements were studied to determine the capacity. Table 5 below is a summary for each channel section as shown in Attachment L. Table 5 Drainage Easement Cross Section Capacity Summary Table Cross Section Capacity Q 100 Capacity (cfs) (cfs) Check CHNL Yes CHNL No CHNL No CHNL Yes CHNL Yes CHNL Yes CHNL Yes CHNL No CHNL No CHNL Yes The capacity of cross sections Channel 1 XS 1+75 and XS 4+25 are within a heavily wooden area between five houses (three on the west side and two on the east side). In order to increase capacity at this location, the channel will have to be cleared and re-graded to provide a larger channel section. If these properties did not have experience negative impacts from the June 2010 storm event, then additional improvements may not be necessary. HUNTERS CREEK DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The first culvert crossing and curb inlets were studied to determine the existing capacity. The culvert consists of 2-3 x8 concrete box culverts. When taking into consideration the completion of the Enclave at Westpointe detention pond (100-year allowable release rate of 30cfs), the culvert is capable of conveying the storm water runoff in accordance with City of New Braunfels criteria. There are two existing curb inlets connected to the culverts as well. An existing 5ft is located on the northwest side and a 10ft curb inlet on the southeast side of Hunters P a g e 8
10 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek Creek Dr. Both inlets have been studied and have capacity of 57 cfs, which is sufficient to intercept the 100-year storm event. CONCLUSION Based on the findings of the study, the individual recommendations are described in the next section. While the analysis of Oak Run Pkwy was sufficient to get a clear picture of what is taken place during rain events, further study is needed to have an accurate model of the detention pond. This analysis should be performed prior to moving forward with design of any storm water improvements. An issue that was brought to the attention of the City prior to this study was the impact of filling in the two stock ponds that were near the intersection of Independence Dr and Oak Run Pkwy. The concern was that these ponds were provided detention that has now been removed with the construction of Oak Run Pkwy. After reviewing the drainage patterns at this location, both stock ponds were located along the ridge of two drainage boundaries. The only storm water runoff that was captured in these ponds was the actual rainfall that fell directly into the ponds. There were no contributing watersheds to either pond. A majority of both ponds actually were within the uppermost limits of the Panther Canyon watershed. Based on the results of this study, it is our opinion that the impact of removing these stock ponds did not result in a negative impact to the Hunters Creek Subdivision. RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations listed below are not only intended to bring the improvements up to current design standards, but in cases like the Hunters Trail Cul de sac, the recommendations are intended to provide improvement to an existing situation that currently satisfies the City s Design criteria. 1. Construct underground storm drain at the beginning at the intersection of Hunters Trace and Oak Run Pkwy and discharging into the drainage easement on Hunters Creek Dr. The underground system would need to capture the overflow from the Gardens of Hunters Creek Detention Pond. The controlling section in Oak Run Pkwy was cross section 1, consisting of a capacity of cfs. The 100-year storm event exceeds this by over 100 cfs. In order to provide improvement to the property at 311 Hunters Creek, the underground system would need to convey all of the additional flow that the street section cannot handle. The storm drain size needed to convey this flow would be a 48 storm drain with associated inlets to capture the runoff. See Attachment N for Preliminary Probable Cost Estimate. 2. P a g e 9
11 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek a. Reconstruct the existing driveway approaches in the Hunters Trail cul-desac to a height at least 1.0ft above the gutter elevation. The head required to pass the 100-year storm event is 0.80ft. Constructing the driveways slightly higher should reduce the amount of runoff entering the property from the cul-de-sac. b. Reconstruct the existing channel to an earthen trapezoidal channel with 4:1 side slopes to achieve a capacity of 75cfs. 3. Conduct interviews with the property owners of 40 Hunters Pt, 52 Hunters Pt, 64 Hunters Pt, 29 Hunters Chase, and 38 Hunters Chase regarding the impacts experience in their backyards during the June 2010 storm event. The improvements could require additional easements and clearing the back of all of these lots. Based on information available, since the upstream and downstream easements have capacity to convey the runoff, our recommendation is to leave this area as is, unless the property owners request a defined drainage channel in their backyards. If an improvement channel is preferred, a 40ft wide trapezoidal channel would be need to convey the flow. P a g e 10
12 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT A EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA EXHIBIT (FROM WESTPOINTE DRAINAGE REPORT) P a g e 11
13 WESTPOINTE Stormwater Management Plan Dated March 31, 2008
14 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT B PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA EXHIBIT (FROM WESTPOINTE DRAINAGE REPORT) P a g e 12
15 WESTPOINTE Stormwater Management Plan Dated March 31, 2008
16 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT C DRAINAGE AREA AERIAL EXHIBIT P a g e 13
17 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT D EXISTING SWALE HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS P a g e 14
18 Hunters Trace Drainage Analysis Draft HUNTERS PT Cross Section 3 HUNTERS CREEK DR Cross Section 2 HUNTERS TRACE Cross Section 4 & 4 Complete Cross Section 1B Cross Section 7 Cross Section 6 HUNTERS TROPHY Cross Section 5 Cross Section 1A & 1A Modified Ë 1 inch = 100 feet
19 Cross Section for Cross Section-1A Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 1.82 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 7:24:41 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
20 Cross Section for Cross Section-1A-Modified Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 1.82 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 8:04:49 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
21 Cross Section for Cross Section-1B Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Roughness Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth ft Discharge 0.00 ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 9:04:45 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
22 Cross Section for Cross Section-2 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 3.29 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 7:25:16 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
23 Cross Section for Cross Section-3 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 5.11 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 7:25:42 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
24 Cross Section for Cross Section-4 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.00 ft Discharge 0.00 ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 8:54:26 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
25 Cross Section for Cross Section-4 Complete Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 1.12 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 8:54:50 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
26 Cross Section for Cross Section-5 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.99 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 8:55:12 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
27 Cross Section for Cross Section-5 Complete Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 1.12 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 7:26:58 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
28 Cross Section for Cross Section-6 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.43 ft Discharge 6.40 ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 8:56:04 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
29 Cross Section for Cross Section-7 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 2.19 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 4/22/2010 8:56:37 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
30 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT E OAK RUN PKWY EXHIBIT P a g e 15
31 CROSS SECTION 1 CROSS SECTION 2 GARDENS OF HUNTERS CREEK DETENTION POND EXISTING 10FT CURB INLETS EXISTING 20FT CURB INLETS Legend Oak Run Cross Sections Oak Run Drainage Area ± 1 inch = 200 feet ATTACHMENT E OAK RUN PKWY DRAINAGE EXHIBIT
32 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT F OAK RUN PKWY FLOW DISTRIBUTION EXHIBIT P a g e 16
33 CROSS SECTION 1 CROSS SECTION 2 DETENTION POND OVERFLOW Q25 = 59 CFS Q100 = 101 CFS DRAINAGE AREA = 5.88 AC Q10 = CFS Q25 = CFS Q100 = CFS BYPASS FLOW FROM CURB INLETS Q25 = 0 CFS Q100 = 13 CFS Legend Oak Run Cross Sections Oak Run Drainage Area ± 1 inch = 200 feet ATTACHMENT F OAK RUN PKWY FLOW DISTRIBUTION EXHIBIT
34 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT G OAK RUN PKWY CROSS SECTIONS P a g e 17
35 Worksheet for Oak Run Pkway - Section 1 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.49 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+17, ) (0+18, ) (0+18, ) (0+78, ) (0+78, ) (0+79, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 0.22 ft Top Width ft 5/31/ :40:41 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
36 Worksheet for Oak Run Pkway - Section 1 Results Normal Depth 0.49 ft Critical Depth 0.59 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 4.65 ft/s Velocity Head 0.34 ft Specific Energy 0.82 ft Froude Number 1.74 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.49 ft Critical Depth 0.59 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :40:41 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
37 Project Description Cross Section for Oak Run Pkway - Section 1 Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.49 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :41:02 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
38 Worksheet for Oak Run Pkway - Section 2 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.55 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+26, ) (0+26, ) (0+26, ) (0+87, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 0.23 ft 5/31/ :43:18 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
39 Worksheet for Oak Run Pkway - Section 2 Results Top Width ft Normal Depth 0.55 ft Critical Depth 0.74 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 6.69 ft/s Velocity Head 0.70 ft Specific Energy 1.25 ft Froude Number 2.46 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.55 ft Critical Depth 0.74 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :43:18 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
40 Project Description Cross Section for Oak Run Pkway - Section 2 Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.55 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :43:35 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
41 Worksheet for Oak Run Pkway - Section 1 Bypass to Hunters Trail Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.32 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+48, ) (0+78, ) (0+78, ) (0+79, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area 4.94 ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 0.16 ft Top Width ft Normal Depth 0.32 ft Critical Depth 0.38 ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :42:36 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
42 Worksheet for Oak Run Pkway - Section 1 Bypass to Hunters Trail Results Velocity 3.76 ft/s Velocity Head 0.22 ft Specific Energy 0.54 ft Froude Number 1.65 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.32 ft Critical Depth 0.38 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :42:36 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
43 Cross Section for Oak Run Pkway - Section 1 Bypass to Hunters Trail Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.32 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :43:01 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
44 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT H HUNTERS TRAIL EXHIBIT P a g e 18
45 EXISTING 30FT CURB OPENING DRAINAGE AREA 4.53 AC OAK RUN PKWY CFS BYPASSES INTERSECTION TO HUNTERS TRAIL HUNTERS CREEK DR CFS DRAINS TOWARDS DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN HUNTERS CREEK DETENTION POND DRAINAGE AREA AC Legend Drainage Easements ± 1 inch = 200 feet ATTACHMENT H HUNTERS TRAIL DRAINAGE AREA EXHIBIT
46 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT I HUNTERS CREEK DR EXHIBIT P a g e 19
47 EXISTING CURB INLETS CULVERT CROSSING DETENTION POND DRAINAGE AREA AC DETENTION POND DRAINAGE AREA AC Legend Drainage Easements Hunters Creek Drainage Area Drainage Area Area Capture in Detention Pond ± 1 inch = 500 feet ATTACHMENT I HUNTERS CREEK DR EXHIBIT
48 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT J HUNTERS CREEK DR CULVERT MODEL OUTPUT EXHIBIT P a g e 20
49 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D 2011 by Autodesk, Inc. Tuesday, May HUNTERS CREEK DR - BOX CULVERT Invert Elev Dn (ft) = Pipe Length (ft) = Slope (%) = 0.41 Invert Elev Up (ft) = Rise (in) = 36.0 Shape = Box Span (in) = 96.0 No. Barrels = 2 n-value = Inlet Edge = 0 Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.061, 0.75, 0.04, 0.8, 0.5 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = Top Width (ft) = Crest Width (ft) = Calculations Qmin (cfs) = Qmax (cfs) = Tailwater Elev (ft) = Crown Highlighted Qtotal (cfs) = Qpipe (cfs) = Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 6.62 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 7.20 HGL Dn (ft) = HGL Up (ft) = Hw Elev (ft) = Hw/D (ft) = 1.38 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
50 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT K DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXHIBIT P a g e 21
51 DRAINAGE AREA AC DETENTION POND Legend Drainage Esmts Cross Sections Cross Sections Channel Centerline Drainage Easements Drainage Area Drainage Esmt Drainage Area Detention Pond Drainage Area ± 1 inch = 500 feet ATTACHMENT K DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXHIBIT
52 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT L DRAINAGE EASEMENT CROSS SECTION EXHIBIT P a g e 22
53 CHNL 3 XS CHNL 3 XS CHANNEL 1 CHNL 1 XS CHNL 1 XS CHANNEL 3 CHNL 2 XS CHANNEL 2 CHNL 1 XS CHANNEL 4 CHNL 4 XS CHNL 2 XS CHNL 1 XS CHNL 1 XS Legend Drainage Esmts Cross Sections Cross Sections Channel Centerline Drainage Easements ± 1 inch = 204 feet ATTACHMENT L DRAINAGE EASEMENT CROSS SECTION EXHIBIT
54 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT M DRAINAGE EASEMENT CROSS SECTIONS MODEL OUTPUT P a g e 23
55 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section 0+40 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 2.70 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+50, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft 5/31/ :46:14 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
56 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section 0+40 Results Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 1.55 ft Top Width ft Normal Depth 2.70 ft Critical Depth 2.57 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 6.30 ft/s Velocity Head 0.62 ft Specific Energy 3.32 ft Froude Number 0.89 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.70 ft Critical Depth 2.57 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :46:14 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
57 Cross Section for Channel 1 - Section 0+40 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 2.70 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :46:37 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
58 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section 1+75 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 1.71 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+50, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 0.76 ft 5/31/ :46:55 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
59 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section 1+75 Results Top Width ft Normal Depth 1.71 ft Critical Depth 1.54 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 3.92 ft/s Velocity Head 0.24 ft Specific Energy 1.95 ft Froude Number 0.79 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.71 ft Critical Depth 1.54 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :46:55 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
60 Cross Section for Channel 1 - Section 1+75 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 1.71 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :47:14 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
61 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Discharge ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+47, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 2.84 ft Elevation Range to ft Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft 5/31/ :49:22 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
62 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section Results Hydraulic Radius 1.39 ft Top Width ft Normal Depth 2.84 ft Critical Depth 2.28 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 3.99 ft/s Velocity Head 0.25 ft Specific Energy 3.09 ft Froude Number 0.60 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.84 ft Critical Depth 2.28 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :49:22 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
63 Cross Section for Channel 1 - Section Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 2.84 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :49:41 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
64 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section 4+25 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+43, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 0.76 ft Top Width ft 5/31/ :47:31 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
65 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section 4+25 Results Normal Depth ft Critical Depth 1.61 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 4.33 ft/s Velocity Head 0.29 ft Specific Energy 2.00 ft Froude Number 0.88 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth ft Critical Depth 1.61 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :47:31 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
66 Cross Section for Channel 1 - Section 4+25 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :47:50 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
67 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section 7+50 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 3.04 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+50, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 1.88 ft Top Width ft Normal Depth 3.04 ft Critical Depth 3.01 ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :48:10 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
68 Worksheet for Channel 1 - Section 7+50 Results Velocity 7.59 ft/s Velocity Head 0.89 ft Specific Energy 3.94 ft Froude Number 0.98 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 3.04 ft Critical Depth 3.01 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :48:10 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
69 Cross Section for Channel 1 - Section 7+50 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 3.04 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :48:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
70 Worksheet for Channel 2 - Section 1+25 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 2.11 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+50, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 0.99 ft Top Width ft 5/31/ :48:47 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
71 Worksheet for Channel 2 - Section 1+25 Results Normal Depth 2.11 ft Critical Depth 2.31 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 7.32 ft/s Velocity Head 0.83 ft Specific Energy 2.94 ft Froude Number 1.29 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.11 ft Critical Depth 2.31 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :48:47 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
72 Cross Section for Channel 2 - Section 1+25 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 2.11 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :49:06 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
73 Worksheet for Channel 2 - Section 4+50 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 2.93 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+48, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 1.33 ft Top Width ft Normal Depth 2.93 ft Critical Depth 3.25 ft 5/31/ :49:59 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
74 Worksheet for Channel 2 - Section 4+50 Results Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 8.90 ft/s Velocity Head 1.23 ft Specific Energy 4.16 ft Froude Number 1.36 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.93 ft Critical Depth 3.25 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :49:59 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
75 Cross Section for Channel 2 - Section 4+50 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 2.93 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :50:18 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
76 Worksheet for Channel 3 - Section 1+67 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 1.76 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+06, ) (0+20, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area 8.74 ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 0.77 ft 5/31/ :50:36 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
77 Worksheet for Channel 3 - Section 1+67 Results Top Width ft Normal Depth 1.76 ft Critical Depth 2.04 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 7.04 ft/s Velocity Head 0.77 ft Specific Energy 2.53 ft Froude Number 1.37 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.76 ft Critical Depth 2.04 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :50:36 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
78 Cross Section for Channel 3 - Section 1+67 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 1.76 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :54:40 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
79 Worksheet for Channel 3 - Section 2+49 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.90 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+11, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area 8.42 ft² Wetted Perimeter ft Hydraulic Radius 0.54 ft 5/31/ :55:38 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
80 Worksheet for Channel 3 - Section 2+49 Results Top Width ft Normal Depth 0.90 ft Critical Depth 1.12 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 6.33 ft/s Velocity Head 0.62 ft Specific Energy 1.52 ft Froude Number 1.51 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.90 ft Critical Depth 1.12 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :55:38 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
81 Cross Section for Channel 3 - Section 2+49 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.90 ft Discharge ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :56:00 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
82 Worksheet for Channel 4 - Section 0+50 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.70 ft Section Definitions Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (-0+50, ) (0+03, ) Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Open Channel Weighting Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge 9.05 ft³/s Elevation Range to ft Flow Area 2.67 ft² Wetted Perimeter 6.88 ft 5/31/ :56:21 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 2
83 Worksheet for Channel 4 - Section 0+50 Results Hydraulic Radius 0.39 ft Top Width 6.49 ft Normal Depth 0.70 ft Critical Depth 0.68 ft Critical Slope ft/ft Velocity 3.39 ft/s Velocity Head 0.18 ft Specific Energy 0.88 ft Froude Number 0.93 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.70 ft Critical Depth 0.68 ft Channel Slope ft/ft Critical Slope ft/ft 5/31/ :56:21 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 2 of 2
84 Cross Section for Channel 4 - Section 0+50 Project Description Friction Method Solve For Manning Formula Discharge Input Data Channel Slope ft/ft Normal Depth 0.70 ft Discharge 9.05 ft³/s Cross Section Image 5/31/ :56:49 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley Center FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [ ] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT USA Page 1 of 1
85 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT N PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COST OAK RUN PKWY P a g e 24
86 PRELIMINARY OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COSTS OAK RUN PKWY AND HUNTERS TRAIL Oak Run Pkwy Storm Drain Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total 48in RCP Storm Drain LF 650 $ $104, in RCP Storm Drain LF 120 $70.00 $8, ft Curb Inlets EA 5 $10, $50, ft x 5ft Junction Box EA 5 $5, $27, way Inlet EA 1 $7, $7, Outfall - 5" Concrete Rip Rap SY 150 $70.00 $10, Pavement Repair SY 600 $60.00 $36, Subtotal $243, Total for Oak Run Pkwy $243,400 Hunters Trail Cul-de-sac Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Driveway Reconstruct SY 1000 $50.00 $50, Trapezoidal Channel Construction CY 500 $30.00 $15, Subtotal $65, Total for Hunters Trail Cul-de-sac $65,000
87 Drainage Analysis: Hunters Trace, Westpointe, and Hunters Creek ATTACHMENT O THE ENCLAVE WEST DETENTION POND DRAINAGE EXHIBIT P a g e 25
88 Legend Storm Drain Opt 1 Storm Drain Opt 2 Drainage Easements ± 1 inch = 100 feet ATTACHMENT O THE ENCLAVE WEST POND STORM DRAIN EXHIBIT
ATTACHMENT 6 WATER QUALITY SWALE DESIGN ADDENDUM
ATTACHMENT 6 WATER QUALITY SWALE DESIGN ADDENDUM 12 October 2010 Project No. 073-81694.0022 Mr. Robert R. Monok Project Manager Energy Fuels Resource Corporation 44 Union Boulevard, Suite 600 Lakewood,
More informationRUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN
RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE: SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY FLINT CREEK POWER PLANT LANDFILL CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT 0273-S3N-R2 PREPARED FOR: SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
More informationSTORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. WHITE BLUFF PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL
STORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. WHITE BLUFF PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO. 199-S3N-R3 AFIN: 3-11 OCTOBER 13, 216 STORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN ENTERGY
More informationJanuary 20, Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303)
January 20, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter
More informationRETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE
-7 Given: Total Tributary Area = 7.5 ac o Tributary Area within Existing R/W = 5.8 ac o Tributary Area, Impervious, Outside of R/W = 0.0 ac o Tributary Area, Pervious, Outside of R/W = 1.7 ac o Tributary
More informationNC2 Ash Disposal Area Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan
NC2 Ash Disposal Area Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan Omaha Public Power District Nebraska City Station Nebraska City, Nebraska October 17, 2016 OPPD NC2 Ash Disposal Area Run-On and Run-Off Control
More informationSTORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL
STORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO. 0200-S3N-R2 AFIN: 32-00042 OCTOBER 12, 2016 STORMWATER RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN
More informationThe site slopes generally from the southwest to northeast at approximately 3.7 percent.
March 3, 2017 Nate Hatleback Project Manager, City of Thornton Development Engineering 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7694 RE: Riverdale Five Retail Drainage Conformance Letter Dear
More informationEnvironmental Design Group
SEDIMENT CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND POST CONSTRUCTION BMP REPORT for Hudson Salt Storage and Bus Garage 5810 Hudson Drive HUDSON, OHIO SUMMIT COUNTY Prepared by Environmental
More informationCity of Fort Collins. Spring Creek Place (2105 South College Avenue) Preliminary Drainage Report
City of Fort Collins Spring Creek Place (2105 South College Avenue) Preliminary Drainage Report OCTOBER 2016 VERSION 3 Prepared By: 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 Daniel L. Skeehan,
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY REPORT ARBOR VILLAS
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY REPORT FOR CARSON CITY, NEVADA Prepared for: Capstone Communities 9441 Double Diamond Pkwy #14 Reno, Nevada 89521 Prepared by: Manhard Consulting Ltd. 985 Double R Boulevard
More informationSTORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL
Appendix I STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL by: SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A. GEN ERAL DESIGN STAN DARDS AN D POLICIES 1. STREET AND LOCAL DRAINAGE Discharge estimates for specified design storms shall be calculated
More informationIntroduction to Storm Sewer Design
A SunCam online continuing education course Introduction to Storm Sewer Design by David F. Carter Introduction Storm sewer systems are vital in collection and conveyance of stormwater from the upstream
More informationINITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257
INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 HUFFAKER ROAD (PLANT HAMMOND) PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL LANDFILL (HUFFAKER ROAD LANDFILL) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion
More informationNorth Omaha Ash Landfill Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan
North Omaha Ash Landfill Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan Omaha Public Power District North Omaha Station Omaha, Nebraska October 17, 216 OPPD North Omaha Ash Landfill Run-On and Run-Off Control
More informationStorm Water System Improvements
IV Storm Water System Improvements A. General The purpose of this Section is to establish standard principles and practices for the design and construction of storm drainage facilities within the City
More informationSTORMWATER DESIGN CRITERIA. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT City of Hudson Oaks, Texas
STORMWATER DESIGN CRITERIA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT City of Hudson Oaks, Texas REVISED JANUARY 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword.... 3 Storm Water Management Policy.... 4 Definitions.... 5 1. Preliminary
More informationCONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECKLIST
CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECKLIST The design engineer is responsible for ensuring that plans submitted for city review are in accordance with this checklist. It is requested that the executed checklist be submitted
More information100-yr Design Runoff (cfs) Basin ID 103b A a B B C Totals
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The drainage for this site has been designed to be less than the maximum allowable runoff from each basin as stated in the Overall Rigden Farm drainage plan. Table 1 compares the actual
More informationSummary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California
July 15, 2015 Bellecci & Associates, Inc Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California 1. Methodology: Method: Unit Hydrograph Software: Bentley Pond Pack Version 8i
More informationFoothills Solar & Substation
Final Drainage Study Foothills Solar & Substation Loveland, CO Prepared for: City of Loveland 410 E. Fifth Street Loveland, CO 80537 December 12, 2015 1501 Academy Ct. Ste. 203 Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
More informationAppendix H: Sewer Capacity Study
Appendix H: Sewer Capacity Study SoCal Civil Solutions Inc. September 28, 2017 Mr. Taylor Abernathy, PE, CFM City of Orange Public Works - Subdivision Department 300 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866
More informationChapter 7. Street Drainage. 7.0 Introduction. 7.1 Function of Streets in the Drainage System. 7.2 Street Classification
7. Introduction This chapter summarizes methods to evaluate runoff conveyance in various street cross sections and curb types in the Town of Castle Rock and identifies acceptable upper limits of street
More informationDRAFT. Technical Memorandum. Whitney Road Drainage & Safety Enhancements Phase III Hydraulic Update. Prepared For:
DRAFT Technical Memorandum Whitney Road Drainage & Safety Enhancements Phase III Hydraulic Update Prepared For: Pinellas County Department of Environment and Infrastructure Division of Engineering and
More informationCHECKLIST FOR STREETS, INLETS, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN
CHECKLIST FOR STREETS, INLETS, I. STREET CLASSIFICATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA A. Determine drainage classification for the roadway section using Table 7-1 or Table 7-2. B. Determine the allowable flow depth
More informationPreliminary Drainage Study: Town of Hillsboro Pedestrian & Traffic Safety Project Traffic Calming Project UPC# 70587
Preliminary Drainage Study: Town of Hillsboro Pedestrian & Traffic Safety Project Traffic Calming Project UPC# 70587 Introduction: The intent of this study was to perform a preliminary drainage study of
More informationCITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL
CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL Book 2 (SW) SW7 September 2017 SW7.01 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a basis for inlet design utilizing City of Fort Wayne standard inlets and
More informationDIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA
DIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA Section 5.01 GENERAL The following storm drainage design criteria shall apply to all storm drainage designs in the City. Additional design criteria are specified in the
More informationExample 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)
Chapter 10 Design Examples Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond) Example 2: Filter Design in a commercial development
More information3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions
iswm TM Criteria Manual - = Not typically used or able to meet design criterion. 1 = The application and performance of proprietary commercial devices and systems must be provided by the manufacturer and
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1
TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN SECTION TITLE PAGE 105.1. SPECIFICATIONS AND SCOPE 105.1 105.2. METHODS OF ANALYSIS 105.1 105.2.1. Rational Method
More informationINITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257
INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 PLANT BOWEN PRIVATE INDUSTRY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY (ASH LANDFILL) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals
More informationExtended Detention Basin Design
Extended Detention Basin Design 1 Extended Detention 2 Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Extended Detention Basin L&D Vol. 2 Section 1117.3 Provides quality and quantity treatment 3 Extended Detention
More informationChapter 9 STORMWATER DESIGN. Table 9-1 Hydrology Design Methods
www.knoxvilletn.gov/engineering/ 9.1 Hydrology Methods Chapter 9 STORMWATER DESIGN Table 9-1 shows the various hydrologic computation methods that can be used to compute peak flows in the City of Knoxville.
More informationTechnical Memorandum
Tucson Office 3031 West Ina Road Tucson, AZ 85741 Tel 520.297.7723 Fax 520.297.7724 www.tetratech.com Technical Memorandum To: Kathy Arnold From: Greg Hemmen, P.E. Company: Rosemont Copper Company Date:
More informationCITY OF TROY DESIGN STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
CITY OF TROY DESIGN STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY: F-7587 JANUARY 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 SECTION 6 APPENDIX ROADWAY DESIGN DRAINAGE
More informationPhase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)
Permit Application No.: 17-181 Rules: Erosion Control, Wetland Protection, and Waterbody Crossings & Structures Applicant: Hennepin County Received: 4/27/17 Project: CSAH 112 Phase II Complete: 9/5/17
More informationStormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia
Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia Adopted November 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 2 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 2 2.1.1.
More informationARTICLE V: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
ARTICLE V: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS Section 501: Purpose An adequate drainage system including necessary ditches, pipes, culverts, drains, inlets, bridges, detention ponds, etc. shall
More informationMODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville
MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual City of Centerville Adopted December 6, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 1 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS... 1 2.1.1. Discharge
More informationV. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
V. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 5.1 Formulation of Drainage Improvements As indicated in Chapter 4, following the completion of the hydrologic analysis associated with future land use conditions, drainage improvements
More informationRun-On and Run-Off Control System Plan Neal North Energy Center Monofill
Run-On and Run-Off Control System Plan Neal North Energy Center Monofill MidAmerican Energy Company, Neal North Energy Center Coal Combustion Residual Rule Compliance October 10, 2016 Run-On and Run-Off
More informationDRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Project Name: Firm Name: Map ID: Engineer: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone Number: Fax Number: Property Owner: Address: City: State: Zip: Reviewed By: Date Received: Date Accepted for Review: The following
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or
More informationFinal Drainage Report
Thornton Electric Substation Project Final Drainage Report December 14, 2016 DRAFT Prepared for: Xcel Energy, 1800 Larimer Street, Suite 400, Denver, Colorado 80202 Prepared by: 350 Indiana Street, Suite
More informationIII. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES
III. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES Within the Growth Management Boundary, the existing storm drainage facilities are largely associated with development that has historically occurred in the ten drainage
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment
More informationDawson County Public Works 25 Justice Way, Suite 2232, Dawsonville, GA (706) x 42228
Dawson County Public Works 25 Justice Way, Suite 2232, Dawsonville, GA 30534 (706) 344-3500 x 42228 DAWSON COUNTY STORM WATER REVIEW CHECKLIST Project Name: Property Address: Engineer: Fax #/Email: Date:
More informationSUBDIVISION CHECKLIST. Subdivision Name. Prior To Review. Preliminary plan approved by Planning Commission / Council as required.
SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST Subdivision Name Account Number Review Engineer Prior To Review Preliminary plan approved by Planning Commission / Council as required. Review fee paid. Statement of Responsibility
More informationZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1500 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 149 ARTICLE 1500 DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS
OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 149 ARTICLE 1500 DRAINAGE AND STORM SEWERS 1500.01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1500.02 NATURE OF STORM WATER FACILITIES 1500.03 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS 1500.04 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
More informationSECTION STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 402 STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 400-1
CITY OF THORNTON Standards and Specifications Revised: October 2012 SECTION 400 - STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 401 GENERAL PROVISIONS 400-1
More informationNovember 21, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report
November 21, 2016 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7295 RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report As per your request, we are submitting to you the drainage report
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY For 34 th & J Residences 3402 J St. San Diego, CA 92102 A.P.N 545-250-08 Prepared By: Kenneth J. Discenza, P.E. Site Design Associates, Inc. 1016 Broadway, Suite A El Cajon,
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THE EDI MASTER PLAN April 5, 2015 Wayne W. Chang, MS, PE 46548 Chang Civil Engineering Hydrology Hydraulics Sedimentation P.O. Box 9496 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (858) 692-0760
More informationHYDROLOGY CHECKLIST FOR LAND DISTURBANCE PERMITS
HYDROLOGY CHECKLIST FOR LAND DISTURBANCE PERMITS Project Name: Project Number: Reviewed By: Date: Telephone: Email: Address all items marked with an X Minimum Submittal Requirements 1. Conceptual Review
More informationWarner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual
Warner Robins Stormwater Local Design Manual Prepared for Houston County City of Warner Robins City of Perry City of Centerville May 17, 2005 Version 4 (As presented with adopted Stormwater Ordinance)
More informationWater Resources Management Plan
P L Y M O U T H M I N N E S O T A Appendix D: The developed a to analyze and minimize the impact of existing and future development on the City s natural resources. It is important to the City to have
More informationJacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc.
Area 5: Blackiston Mill Road at Dead Man's Hollow Flooding Assessment Jacobi, Toombs, and Lanz, Inc. This document summarizes an assessment of drainage and flooding concerns and provides recommendations
More informationCOMPUTER APPLICATIONS HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
- 7535 COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING Connecting Theory to Practice Fifth Edition HAESTAD PRESS Table of Contents Revision History Foreword CHAPTER 1 BASIC HYDRAULIC PRINCIPLES 1 1.1 General
More informationReport. Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan St. Clair Power Plant St. Clair, Michigan. DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI
Report Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan St. Clair Power Plant St. Clair, Michigan DTE Energy Company One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI October 14, 2016 NTH Project No. 62-160047-04 NTH Consultants,
More informationChapter 8. Inlets. 8.0 Introduction. 8.1 General
. Introduction This chapter provides criteria and design guides for evaluating and designing storm sewer inlets in the City of Centennial. The review of all planning submittals will be based on the criteria
More informationSTORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III - MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 105 STORM DRAINS AND IRRIGATION 105.1. STORM DRAINS... 105.1 105.2. METHODS OF ANALYSIS... 105.1 105.2.1. Rational Method... 105.1 105.2.2.
More informationWELSH POWER PLANT ASH LANDFILL. Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan
WELSH POWER PLANT ASH LANDFILL Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 PREPARED BY: MTG TEXAS FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER: 354 MTG PROJECT NUMBER: 167003 WELSH POWER PLANT - ASH LANDFILL
More informationAppendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study
Appendix H Amanda Estates Drainage Study Hunsaker & Associates 2015 Contents 1 Scope... 1 2 Existing Conditions... 1 3 Project Description... 3 4 Methodology... 5 4.1 Hydrology... 5 4.2 Hydraulics...
More informationPART 3 STORM WATER TECHNICAL MANUAL
PART 3 STORM WATER TECHNICAL MANUAL A. INTRODUCTION The Storm Water Technical Manual contains requirements for land development and construction activities, as well as design criteria and guidelines for
More informationSECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements
SECTION 3 DRAINAGE 3-1 General All Drainage plans for proposed development shall be prepared by a Professional Engineer registered in Virginia, except as noted below. Further, their seal and signature
More informationHY-12 User Manual. Aquaveo. Contents
Y-12 User Manual Aquaveo Contents Overview...2 Watershed Parameters...3 Channel Parameters...3 Storm Drain Parameters...3 Design of new systems...4 Analysis of existing systems...4 Steady flow...4 ydrographic
More informationBMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs
BMP Design Aids 1 Equations / Programs Outlet Discharge Equations Hydrograph and Pond Routing Programs USGS StreamStats 2 Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Training Intent Introduction and overview of
More informationStormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)
Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans) Allen County Stormwater Plan Submittal Checklist The following items must be provided when applying for an Allen County Stormwater
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part 257.82 PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part
More informationDecember 6, Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229
December 6, 2016 Nate Hatleback Project Manager City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 RE: Drainage Conformance Letter Hilton Garden Inn @ The Grove The Grove Filing No 1, lot 5E Thornton,
More informationAPPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE
Storm Drainage 13-G-1 APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE 1.0 Introduction The hydraulic grade line is used to aid the designer in determining the acceptability of a proposed or evaluation of an existing storm
More informationSubmittal Requirements. Post Construction Verification Document Plan Requirements
Submittal Requirements Post Construction Verification Document survey plan in accordance with the items of this Checklist Supporting calculations in accordance with the items of this Checklist A copy of
More informationLocal Stormwater Design Manual. City of Fairburn
APPENDIX D LOCAL STORMWATER DESIGN MANUAL Local Stormwater Design Manual City of Fairburn May 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FORWARD... 1 2. GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... 2 2.1. DETENTION REQUIREMENTS...
More informationINITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR
INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR 257.82 EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part 257 and Part
More informationThe City of Bristol, Tennessee. Infrastructure Design Standards
The City of Bristol, Tennessee Infrastructure Design Standards October 2017 GENERAL PROVISIONS Adoption These Infrastructure Design Standards (the Standards ) are adopted pursuant to Section 62-8 of the
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY Section 257.82 of EPA s regulations requires the owner or operator of an existing or new CCR surface impoundment or any
More informationHydrology Study. For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021
Hydrology Study For Bella Terrazza Portion of Lot 1, Block 39, Subdivision of S Tract, Rancho El Cajon El Cajon, CA 92021 Prepared for Daryl Priest - Priest Development Corporation 124 West Main Street,
More informationDRAINAGE STUDY PHASE 2 REPORT HORRY COUNTY STORMWATER DEPARTMENT HIGHWAY 9 & 57 HORRY COUNTY, SC PREPARED FOR: APRIL 07, 2016 J
DRAINAGE STUDY PHASE 2 REPORT FOR: HIGHWAY 9 & 57 HORRY COUNTY, SC PREPARED FOR: HORRY COUNTY STORMWATER DEPARTMENT APRIL 07, 2016 Prepared by: Savannah, GA Charleston, SC Myrtle Beach, SC Brunswick, GA
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationRE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016
April 12, 2016 Mr. Craig Perl, P.E. Senior Engineer City of Aurora Public Works Department 15151 E. Alameda Parkway Aurora, CO 80012 RE: Final Drainage Letter: Northwest Aurora Alley Improvements 2016
More informationLearn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS
v. 11.0 WMS 11.0 Tutorial Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox and WMS Objectives Learn how to use several Hydraulic Toolbox calculators
More informationMunicipal Stormwater Ordinances Summary Table
APPENDIX F Municipal Ordinances Summary Table Municipality Abington Bryn Athyn Borough Hatboro Borough Ordinance, SALDO Runoff equals pre post Erosion Sediment Control Water Quality Requirements Any which
More informationATTACHMENT 4: Design Calculations and Construction Details
Pennsylvania Pipeline Project Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Southeast Region: Spread 6 November 2016 ATTACHMENT 4: Design Calculations and Construction Details Tetra Tech Pennsylvania Pipeline Project
More informationFORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview
Chapter 5: Hydrology Standards Contents 1.0 Overview... 1 1.1 Storm Runoff Determination... 1 1.2 Design Storm Frequencies... 1 1.3 Water Quality Storm Provisions... 2 1.4 Design Storm Return Periods...
More informationGreen Station CCR Surface Impoundment
Green Station CCR Surface Impoundment Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule Hydrologic and Hydraulic Capacity Assessment and Initial Inflow Design Flood Control
More informationLOWER SWEETWATER CREEK
LOWER SWEETWATER CREEK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN Prepared for the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners By Public Works Department/Engineering Division Stormwater Management Section
More informationChapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements
4.0 Introduction The requirements presented in this section shall be used to aid the design engineer or applicant in the preparation of drainage reports, drainage studies, and construction drawings for
More informationHydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated)
Hydrology Study Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated) Prepared for San Mateo Real Estate & Construction March 9, 21 Rev. 1 11-8-211 Rev.
More informationAstra Engineering LLC
Astra Engineering LLC!"#$#% &'( ) *) ) *)* +## ) ',#$$+-."$% "#"-",-/$+ 0 ) )1'(0 23** ) 243 5*6 78947)3 9**!:;24?)3* 973''!"$#%=4? *9> %-2/- 2+ @:* 3*$/A 2 32 @3*49 13* 32 3-3*-* 2!!2 3*!*!2
More information19 May Provide profiles for all storm sewer going into the ground with the grading permit showing 5 and 100yr HGLs.
19 May 2017 City of Thornton Attn: Nate Hatleback 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 Re: Initial Review Response to 05/16/17 Letter Dear Mr. Hatleback: This letter is in response to technical comments
More informationRUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY
RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.81 PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40
More informationCITY OF BIXBY STORMWATER DRAINAGE CRITERIA
CITY OF BIXBY STORMWATER DRAINAGE CRITERIA August 27, 2001 PREPARED BY MESHEK & ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 636 20 W. 2 ND ST., SUITE 200 SAND SPRINGS, OK 74063 918-241-2803 1 E.1.1 Master Drainage Plans
More informationChapter 11 Drainage Improvements
Chapter 11 Drainage Improvements U30011.docx 04/14/17 Chapter 11 Drainage Improvements 11.1 Requirements for Storm Drainage Plans... 1 11.1.1 General... 1 11.1.2 Minor and Major Design Storms... 2 11.1.3
More informationStormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division ES Policy # 3-01
Stormwater Management Studies PDS Engineering Services Division Revised Date: 2/28/08 INTRODUCTION The City of Overland Park requires submission of a stormwater management study as part of the development
More informationThe City of North Las Vegas (CNLV) does not allow valley gutters to be constructed across streets with right-of-way widths of 80 feet or greater.
Background The City of rth Las Vegas strives to provide the development community with adequate information to ensure the successful completion of any project in the City. To aid in the submittal of a
More informationTOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Subdivision Application Minimum Submission Requirements
TOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Subdivision Application Minimum Submission Requirements This checklist is to be completed and submitted with all Subdivision Applications. The Town reserves
More informationFIRM NAME DESIGNER: CHECKER: DATE: FPID #: DESCRIPTION: COUNTY: DRAINAGE DESIGN CHECKLIST. Designers Initials. Checkers Initials.
I. Drainage Report A. Executive Summary - Brief Overview of Project Drainage Design B. Project Description 1. Existing Conditions 2. Proposed Project Conditions 3. Project Justification Narrative - Basin
More informationFINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FALLBROOK FILING NO. 3 Thornton, CO
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT FALLBROOK FILING NO. 3 Thornton, CO May 6, 2016 JN: 14053 Prepared for: Carlson Associates CalAtlantic Homes PO Box 247 6161 S. Syracuse Way, Suite 200 Eastlake, CO 80614 Greenwood
More informationDESIGN OF CHANNEL FLOW DIVERSION FACILITIES
DESIGN OF CHANNEL FLOW DIVERSION FACILITIES FOR RIPARIAN HABITAT IRRIGATION BRUCE M. PHILLIPS, M.S., P.E. ABSTRACT Increased awareness and concern regarding environmental degradation has resulted in protection
More information