Shippers meeting Maintenance Schedule February 9 th, 2012 1
Agenda Look back at 2011 LNG terminal maintenance 2012 maintenance schedule 2012 shippers survey Communication and publication Ongoing European harmonisation Conclusion 2
Look back at 2011 Sophie Ménard - Marketing & Sales - GRTgaz 3
Where to find indicators? 4
Indicators published Reduced capacity available Compliance with the schedule published at the beginning of the year on the rise Compliance with the schedule as published at D-60 on the rise Compliance with the schedule published at the beginning of the year, to lower Compliance with the schedule as published at D-60, to lower 5
2011: A very good reliability of the maintenance schedule Over 2011, 99.74% of firm capacity made available is at least equal to firm capacity planned (this result takes only into account PIRs, PITTM and North to South link capacities). Rate (in %) 100 98 96 94 92 90 88 Annual rate: 99.74 ConfPTC- % 86 84 82 80 2011 : Conf PTC - Compliance with the annual maintenance schedule to lower 6
2011, a year for a record The works schedule published at the beginning of the year was closely followed in 2011. Compared to the last years, 2011 publication precision has increased. February Maintenance Schedule is reliable 2007 2.5% 2008 1.1% 2009 0.56% 2010 0.97% 2011 0.26% margin of error divided by 10 Rate of capacity reduced below forecast levels 7
Rised capacities during 2011 The compliance with the annual maintenance schedule on rise is still good. 100 98 96 Rate (in %) 94 92 90 88 Annual rate: ConfPTC+ 95.87 % 86 84 82 80 2007 15% 2008 3.4% 2009 3.9% 2010 3.2% 2011 4.13% Rate of capacity rised over forecast levels 8
Your satisfaction? Were you satisfied by our communication on maintenance schedule during 2011? 9
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 10
LNG Terminal maintenance Pascal Fonrouge - Sales - Elengy 11
Summary General points Operating principle of an LNG terminal Types of maintenance works on an LNG Terminal Cargo scheduling process 12
General points Elengy operates and maintains three LNG Terminals Mains figures : 13
Operating principle Three functions which have a different impact on the managing of capacities Ship access and unloading (berthing, unloading arms) LNG storage Regasification and send-out on GRTgaz network 14
Types of maintenance works on a LNG terminal New fenders Mandatory inspections and tests (Ex : controlling safety devices, testing safety valves, wall thickness on equipment under pressure, ). Maintenance (Ex : LP and HP cryogenic pumps, Open Rack Vaporisers, cleaning filters on heating system, ). Berth n 2 Development and Revamping (Ex : tank revamping, cryogenic valves and piping replaced, electric power lines, upgrade of berthing capacity for Qmax vessels, ). Tank n 2 Steel frame and cryogenic pipe insulation New mooring hooks 15
Cargoes scheduling process Send-out Capacity Contractual commitment on the unloading slots Storage management Annual delivery program fixing process Send-out capacity December Y-1 May Y-1 Adjacent TSOs capacity The send-out capacity deducted from the terminal regasification capacity and the GRTgaz transmission capacity 16
www.elengy.com Thanks for your attention
2012 Maintenance Schedule Carole Etienne Gas System division - GRTgaz Mathilde Stoltz Sales - Storengy Pascal Fonrouge Sales - Elengy 18
Agenda Key points Main figures describing 2012 maintenance program Main works Comparison of the impact of 2012 vs 2011 maintenance program Graph presenting available capacities On each contractual paths Resulting from the coordination with adjacent operators Storages filling 19
Key points Maintenance works planning for 2012 still under construction The filling of the underground storages is guaranteed in 2012 GRTgaz is doing its best to optimise its work schedule in cooperation with the adjacent operators 20
Why are maintenance works necessary? There are 3 major kinds of works: Preventive maintenance (testing, inspection, etc.) Repair works (depending on inspection results, following damage to facilities by a third party, etc.) Actions to increase future capacity (connection of new facilities to the existing system, etc.) 21
Main works for 2012 : pipes inspection Instrumented pigging (+ a period of repairs) on a section of the pipe between Taisnières H and Oltingue Instrumented pigging (+ a period of repairs) on the pipe used to inject in Atlantique Nord storage group 22
Main works for 2012 : development New pipe (50 km) in order to prepare the future connection of Dunkerque LNG terminal New devices to develop linepack capacities near Obergailbach (need for Combined Cycle Power stations) New compressor station near Paris to transit more quantities of gas to Atlantique Nord storage group Dismantling of turbo compressor station (replaced by electrical ones) New interconnection station and compressor station between Fos and north balancing zone
Main works for 2012 Instrumented pigging Pipe repairs Other kind of works Cleaning pigging 24
Key figures : accumulated available firm capacities 450 Forecast of minimum available capacities (TWh) in the summer (April to October) 400 389 389 350 300 250 200 2011 2012 150 131 140 100 105 104 75 69 50 0 TOTAL Entry PIR TOTAL Exit PIR TOTAL N>S & Inj Nord Atlantique More or less the same impact than in 2011 TOTAL PITTM 25
Available capacities on border points 140 20 GWh/d. transferred in 2011 Forecast of minimum available capacities (TWh) in the summer (April to October) 120 100 107 112 104 103 117 111 Obergailbach: more impacting works (development of linepack capacities) 80 60 60 62 2011 2012 40 47 47 45 42 20 15 17 0 Entry Dunkerque Entry Taisnières H Entry Taisnières B Entry Obergailbach Entry Midi Exit Oltingue Exit Midi Dunkerque: more impacting works in 2012 compared to 2011 (tie-in of a new pipe) Taisnières H: less impacting works in 2012 than in 2011 26
Terminals capacities 80 Forecast of minimum available capacities (TWh) in the summer (April to October) 70 69 69 71 60 62 50 40 30 2011 2012 20 10 0 PITM Fos PITM Montoir 27 2012: repairs on main pipes connected to Fos LNG terminals now finished 2012: repairs on main pipes connected to Montoir LNG terminal now finished
Links capacities 80 70 Forecast of minimum available capacities (TWh) in the summer (April to October 75 69 60 50 40 30 2011 2012 20 10 0 North to South + injection in Nord Atlantique (firm capacity) 2012 : more works with impacts compared to 2011 Even if repairs on Maine pipe are finished: Instrumented pigging + a period of repairs on the main pipe used for injection (between Cherré and Chémery) More maintenance works on Cherré compressor station 28
Coordination with all adjacent operators Particular iterating process for coordination with Elengy, STMFC and Storengy GASSCO Dunkerque Fluxys Taisnières OGE Obergaibach Elengy Montoir Oltingue Transitgas Storengy Midi TIGF Fos Elengy STMFC 29
Send-out capacities from Elengy in Montoir 30
GRTgaz available capacities in Montoir 31
Results of coordination between Elengy & GRTgaz in Montoir 32
33
Send-out capacities from Elengy in Fos Tonkin 34
Send-out capacities from Elengy/STMFC in Fos Cavaou 35
Send-out capacities in Fos LNG terminals 36
GRTgaz available capacities in Fos 37
GRTgaz available capacities in Fos 38
Results of coordination between Elengy/STMFC & GRTgaz in Fos 39
Injection in Atlantique Nord storage group (Chémery-Soings-Céré) 40
Injection in Nord-Ouest storage group (St Illiers, Beynes supérieur + profond) 41
Injection in Nord-Est storage group (St Clair, Germigny, Cerville, Trois-Fontaines) 42
Injection in Sud-Est storage group (Etrez, Tersanne, Manosque)
Injection in Nord B storage group (Gournay) 44
Dunkerque 45
Taisnières H 46
Taisnières B 47
Obergailbach 48
Exit Midi (South zone > TIGF) 49
Exit Oltingue Coordination under discussion with OGE, Transitgas and Fluxys to limit the impact of works planned by OGE during summer 2012 50
Link North to South 51
Filling of storages GRTgaz study carried out for every group of underground storages, taking into account: restrictions of capacities due to GRTgaz works on all the contractual paths forecasts of storages performances and the filling targets at the end of the injection campaign supplied by Storengy capacities of LNG terminals marketed by Elengy and STMFC Hypothesis: the storages are totally empty at the beginning of the injection campaign the target at the end of the injection campaign corresponds to the maximum filling (100% of available volume) The works planned in 2012 by GRTgaz do not limit the filling of the storages during the injection campaign 52
Filling of Atlantique Nord storage group 53
Filling of Nord-Ouest storage group 54
Filling of Nord-Est storage group 55
Filling of Sud-Est storage group 56
Filling of Nord B storage group 57
Next steps Reference publication of maintenance works is foreseen at the end of February 2012 Before this deadline: B2B meetings with shippers who so wish (information on works, examination of points of difficulty, etc.) Adjustment and optimisation according to forecasts 58
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 59
2012 Shipper Survey Feedback Avigaële Le Bastard - Marketing & Sales - GRTgaz 60
Agenda Shipper Survey Feedback Schedule reminder Results of the 2012 Shipper Survey Advices for 2012 61
Shipper Survey Feedback & Schedule reminder 62
A reliable study, but yet many late answers No answers Late answers 15% 21% 64% Answers in time 80% of answers +15% increase since last year 95% of global subscribed capacities reliable study 15% late answers Warn us if specified contact in charge of the Shipper Survey As a reminder, we ask you: Prevision of monthly nominations For each contractual point For one year and/or gas season 63
Shipper Survey schedule Jan/Feb.2012 From Feb 12 until Mar 12 Jun/Jul.2012 From Jul.12 until Oct.12 Nov.2011 Apr.2012 Oct.2012 Winter Gas Season Summer Gas Season Winter + Summer Previsions From November 11 until October 12 Summer Previsions Precisions about Summer From April 12 until October 12 64
Shipper Survey Important in order to: Plan the long-term use of the network Adapt the maintenance program Contacts: Your operational contact transmission-ops@grtgaz.com Obligation due to the Transmission Contract At each Operator s Request, at the most one time a month, the shipper shall notify GRTgaz of its best forecasts for delivery, transport and offtake for each Network Point [ ] (Clause 34) 65
Results of the 2012 Shipper Survey 66
Results of the 2012 shipper survey Comparison between Maintenance Program sent in November actualized: CMXT (Maximum Technical Capacities) Forecasts received from shippers: smoothed monthly values Figure out difficult periods Adjust in consequence the maintenance program Focus on 3 specific contractual points Oltingue Exit Fos North - South Link 67
Oltingue Maintenance program close to forecasts on 1 period Maintenance of 20 days vs. monthly forecasts 68
Fos (Cavaou + Tonkin) Emission Maintenance program doesn t impact any more forecasts : optimisation of restrictions following your answers 69
North South Link Forecasts close to the maintenance program on just 1 restricted period 70
Advices for 2012 71
Advices for 2012 If you meet some difficulties with the Maintenance Program: If global analysis shows no congestions Optimisation possible Daily Capacity/Auctions available UIOLI available Analysis can be done in B2B GRTgaz operational contact B2B meetings all along the year can be organized to improve the use of the network 72
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 73
Communication & publication around the maintenance schedule Sophie Ménard - Marketing & Sales - GRTgaz 74
Planning publication for 2012 Update of the provisional schedule by e-mail First publication on ECT / TRANS@ctions 2011 2012 August November February, 9 th End of D-60 D-5 D-1 February Ongoing concertation with adjacent operators B2B meetings ECT/ TRANS@ctions updates Publication of guidelines on maintenance works impacts for 2012, by email Shippers' Meeting 75
Trans@ctions Novelty Alert in case of more/less restrictions in D-1 New wording: CRT (Technical Restricted Capacity) CTE (Effective Technical Capacity) New data: CMNTi, CMXTi CMXTt CMXTi CTE COSf CMNTi CMNTt Annual forecast zone (PTC) D-3 D-1 76
Trans@ctions Maintenance works schedule Research Results 77
Trans@ctions Maintenance works schedule Detail of a publication notice Historical restrictions data At the first loading, you only visualize TRf, TRi and CTE columns. When selecting «+», you can see minimum, maximum and restrictions data. 78
Trans@ctions Operational capacity with: New publications: ACO/BCO/PCO/SCO ACO : Operational capacity notice PCO : Operational capacity schedule Your last nominations Your operational subscribed capacities The restriction rates Your operational effective capacities BCO : Operational capacity statement SCO : Operational capacity synthesis Your operational allocated capacities UIOLI capacities allocated ( within and above your rights) UIOLI capacities available 79
Trans@ctions Extensive support Demo sessions for business users: February 17 th March 12 th March 2 nd User guide for a quick start Special support during the first 2 weeks of the cutover Reinforced user assistance team for operational matters Dedicated hotline for connection matters Your account manager remains at your disposal for any information 80
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 81
Ongoing European harmonisation Marc Tancré - Gas System division - GRTgaz 82
Scope Define a minimum set of requirements TSOs may give additional info (visual timetable, details on nature of work) Has to be in line with: Regulation 715/2009 Annex 1 Chapter 3 ENTSOG s proposal 83
Regulation 715/2009 Annex 1 Chapter 3 3.1.1 Form of publication (a) on a website accessible to the public, free of charge and without any need to register or otherwise sign on with the transmission system operator; (e) in downloadable format that allows for quantitative analyses; (f) in consistent units, in particular kwh (with a combustion reference temperature of 298,15 K) shall be the unit for energy content and m 3 (at 273,15 K and 1,01325 bar) shall be the unit for volume (i.e. Nm 3 ); (g) in the official language(s) of the Member State and in English. 3.3.3 Information to be published at all relevant points and the time schedule according to which this information should be published (f) planned and actual interruption of interruptible capacity; (g) planned and unplanned interruptions to firm services as well as the information on restoration of the firm services (in particular, maintenance of the system and the likely duration of any interruption due to maintenance). Planned interruptions shall be published at least 42 days in advance. 84
Monthly Annual ENTSOG s proposal Specify contents for planned maintenance publication: Cross border interconnection point affected Impact on the available capacity (% and amount) Nature of planned maintenance on-line inspection; pipeline works; installation works Planning period and duration Specify different conditions for annual and monthly publications: before 15/11/Y-1, publication of periods of preliminary planned maintenance scheduled Y with impact on firm and interruptible capacity at least 42 days before the start of a planned maintenance, publication of the planning and duration (from and to date) and impact on available capacity 85
Annual publication proposal Before 15/11 for the following year.xls file ( downloadable + allowing for quantitative analyses ) Interconnection Point*: XXXXXXXX Units of measurements: kwh (based on GCV; combustion reference temperature: 298.15 K) AND/OR Nm 3 (plus additional units if requested/suitable for national purposes, better if in separated spreadsheets) Month TECHNICAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY FIRM capacity PLANNED INTERRUPTION % AVAILABLE CAPACITY AVAILABLE CAPACITY TECHNICAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY INTERRUPTIBLE capacity (one sub-table for each category: first, second, third class etc) PLANNED INTERRUPTION % AVAILABLE CAPACITY AVAILABLE CAPACITY PERIOD (i.e. number of days during the month affected by the detailed maintenance) # 1 50.0 0.0 100% 50.0 30.0 0.0 100% 30.0 0 50.0 0.0 100% 50.0 30.0 0.0 100% 30.0 0 NATURE OF PLANNED MAINTENANCE (on-line inspection; pipeline works; installation works) 50.0 0.0 100% 50.0 30.0 5.6 81% 24.4 4 installation works 50.0 0.0 100% 50.0 30.0 5.6 81% 24.4 8 installation works 50.0 0.0 100% 50.0 30.0 3.8 88% 26.3 13 pipeline works #12 50.0 6.3 88% 43.8 30.0 30.0 0% 0.0 10 on-line inspection * Please consult also the adjacent TSO's website 86
Monthly publication proposal At least 42 days before related month.xls file ( downloadable + allowing for quantitative analyses ) Interconnection Point*: XXXXXXXX Units of measurements: kwh (based on GCV; combustion reference temperature: 298.15 K) AND/OR Nm 3 (plus additional units if requested/suitable for national purposes, better if in separated spreadsheets) Day TECHNICAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY FIRM capacity PLANNED INTERRUPTION % AVAILABLE CAPACITY AVAILABLE CAPACITY TECHNICAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY INTERRUPTIBLE capacity (one sub-table for each category: first, second, third class etc) PLANNED INTERRUPTION % AVAILABLE CAPACITY AVAILABLE CAPACITY # 1 99 0.0 100% 99.0 2 0 100% 2 NATURE OF PLANNED MAINTENANCE (on-line inspection; pipeline works; installation works) 99 0.0 100% 99.0 2 2 0% 0 Installation works 99 0.0 100% 99.0 2 0.3 85% 1.7 Pipeline works 99 14.8 85% 84.2 2 2 0% 0 On-line inspection 99 14.8 85% 84.2 2 2 0% 0 Installation works #31 (or 30 or 28) 99 14.8 85% 84.2 2 2 0% 0 Installation works * Please consult also the adjacent TSO's website 87
To be continued 88
A few words to conclude Sylvain Lemelletier Marketing & Sales - GRTgaz 89
Let s go on working together... First presentation with Elengy and Storengy We will still progress European harmonisation New tools (Trans@ctions) Thank you to send us your forecasts You can contact us for a B2B meeting Call your usual operational contact 90