Soybean Missouri Crop Performance. Agriculture Experiment Station - College of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources - University of Missouri
|
|
- Moris Parks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Soybean 008 Missouri Crop Performance Wi ebol old, Mason, Knerr, Hasty, Belt, Schwab, Bu rdic ick, Angottiti Agriculture Experiment Station - College of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources - University of Missouri Special Repo rt 5 - November 00808
2 Table of Contents Comparing Varieties... The Authors... Acknowledgments... Experimental Procedures... Test Descriptions Entries Plot Management Data Recorded Accessibility of Data Field Plot Design Locations... North Region North Region Crop Management Summary (Table )...5 Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Tests Craig (Table )...6 Albany (Table )...9 Mooresville (Table )... Novelty (Table 5)...5 Summary of Locations (Table 6)...8 Non-Glyphosate Resistant/Special Traits Soybean Tests Craig (Table )... Albany (Table 8)... Mooresville (Table 9)... Summary of Locations (Table 0)... Central Region Central Region Crop Management Summary (Table )...5 Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Tests Grand Pass (Table )...6 Columbia (Table )...9 Truxton (Table )... Annada (Table 5)...5 Summary of Locations (Table 6)...8 Non-Glyphosate Resistant/Special Traits Soybean Tests Grand Pass (Table ).. Columbia (Table 8). Truxton (Table 9)
3 Southwest Region Annada (Table 0).... Summary of Locations (Table )...5 Southwest Region Crop Management Summary (Table )...6 Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Tests Harrisonville (Table )... Adrian (Table )...50 Urich (Table 5)...5 Nevada (Table 6)...56 Lamar (Table )...59 Summary of Locations (Table 8)...6 Non-Glyphosate Resistant/Special Traits Soybean Tests Harrisonville (Table 9)...65 Adrian (Table 0)...66 Urich (Table )...6 Nevada (Table )...68 Lamar (Table )...69 Summary of Locations (Table )...0 Southeast Region Southeast Region Crop Management Summary (Table 5)... Glyphosate Resistant Tests Chaffee (Table 6)... Dexter (Table )... Morehouse (Table 8)...8 Portageville Loam (Table 9)...8 Portageville Clay (Table 0)...9 Summary of Locations (Table )...9 Non-Glyphosate Resistant/Special Traits Soybean Tests Chaffee (Table )...0 Dexter (Table )...0 Morehouse (Table )...0 Portageville Loam (Table 5)...05 Portageville Clay (Table 6)...06 Summary of Locations (Table )...0 Characteristics for Soybean Varieties...08 Table Numbers for Soybean Varieties...6 Commercial Sources for Soybean Varieties...
4 Missouri 008 Soybean Performance Tests This report is a contribution of the Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. The work was supported by fees from companies and organizations submitting varieties for evaluation. Soybeans were first included in the University of Missouri's variety testing program in 9. The number of entries in the program has increased from 5 in 9 to 8 in 008. The large number of varieties available makes selection of a superior variety difficult. To select intelligently, producers need a reliable, unbiased, up-to-date source of information that will permit valid comparisons among available varieties. The objective of the University of Missouri's performance testing program is to provide this information. The tests are conducted under as uniform conditions as possible. Small plots are used to reduce the chance of soil and climatic variations occurring between the variety plots. Results obtained should aid the individual grower in judging the relative merits of the commercial soybean varieties available in Missouri today. Comparing Varieties The performance of a variety cannot be measured with absolute precision. Uncontrollable variability is involved in the determination of each yield average. This variability sometimes occurs because the soil is not uniform, but many other conditions may also contribute. Because variability exists in all field experimentation, statistics are used as a tool to assist in making decisions. The statistical tool used in these tests is the test of least significant difference (LSD). The LSD is quite simple to apply. When two entries are compared and the difference between them is greater than the LSD, the entries are judged to be significantly different. Differences smaller than the LSD may have occurred by chance and are judged to be not significant. Variety performance may seem inconsistent across locations and from year to year because of differences in rainfall, temperature, soil fertility, diseases, insects and other factors. To obtain an improved estimate of relative variety performance, readers should consider results from more than one location or year. In this publication, the authors have tried to facilitate comparisons across years and locations. In each test, the "top yielding" varieties in each maturity group have been identified. These varieties did not yield significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the same maturity group. They are denoted in the tables by an asterisk (*) next to their yields. Thus, by going down a column, readers can readily identify the highest yielding varieties. By following a row across the table, readers can evaluate the relative performance of a variety during several years or at several locations. From the standpoint of yield, the most desirable varieties will be those that rank among the "top yielding" varieties (that is, have an asterisk) the greatest number of times. Although yield usually receives first consideration, other agronomic characteristics may be equally important when selecting a soybean variety. Standability, maturity, herbicide tolerance and disease resistance are among the characteristics that deserve careful consideration. Several diseases prevalent in Missouri can be devastating to susceptible varieties. Lodging may reduce yields and slow harvest. Poor seed quality is often associated with varieties that mature while temperatures are still high. Late-maturing varieties are occasionally killed by frost. Selection of varieties from several maturity groups can be helpful in spreading out harvest dates. Therefore, information presented on disease reaction, lodging, herbicide tolerance and maturity should also be considered when selecting a variety. The Missouri Variety Testing Program does not recommend specific varieties. Farmers growing a new variety for the first time should consider all available information and then grow a small acreage to determine adaptability. This should be the practice for all new varieties regardless of origin. The Authors William J. Wiebold is a Professor of Plant Sciences and State Extension Specialist; Howard L. Mason and Travis Belt are Research Associates; Delbert Knerr, Richard W. Hasty, David M. Schwab, and Jeremy Angotti are Research Specialists and Bruce Burdick is the Superintendent of the Hundley-Whaley Research Center. Acknowledgments The authors recognize and express their appreciation to the following individuals for their part in making the 008 soybean tests possible: Steve Cunningham, Craig; Bruce Burdick, Superintendent, Hundley-Whaley Research Center, Albany; Ron and Bud Beetsma, Mooresville; Randy Smoot, superintendent, Greenley Memorial Center, Novelty; Roger Tiemann, LaGrange; John Williams, Henrietta; Ryland and Fred Utlaut, Grand Pass; Tim Reinbott, superintendent, Bradford Research and Extension Center, Columbia; Roy Cope, Truxton; Bob Burkemper, Annada; Doug Roth, Harrisonville; Darrel Tenholder, Adrian; Kurt Gretzinger, Urich; Steve Cubbage, Nevada; Wally Norton, Lamar; Martin Eftink, Chaffee; Tom Jennings, Morehouse; Scott Morgan, Dexter and Jake Fisher, superintendent, Delta Research Center, Portageville.
5 Experimental Procedures for Soybean Tests Test Descriptions: Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Test: This test includes glyphosate resistant varieties and receives a postemergence application of glyphosate. Non-Glyphosate Resistant/ Special Traits Soybean Test: This test is a combination of the Non-Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Test and the Special Traits Soybean Test. Examples of soybean lines with special traits include tofu, natto, food grade, isoflavone, high oil, fatty acid profile, and high protein. Three high yield check varieties were included in these tests for comparison. Entries: All producers of soybean varieties were eligible to enter the 008 soybean evaluation tests. Participation was voluntary and the test coordinators exercised no control over which or how many varieties were entered. To help finance the evaluation program, the participants paid $00 per location for each variety entered. Plot Management: All test plots were planted and harvested with commercial equipment modified for small plot work. Row spacing for soybean tests in the North, Central and Southwest Regions was 5 inches. Row spacing for soybean tests in the Southeast Region was 0 inches. Seeding rate for the 5-inch and 0-inch row spacing was,00 seeds/acre. Fertilizer was applied at each location at the discretion of the farmer or the station manager. Weed control was achieved with Roundup WeatherMax herbicide for the Glyphosate Resistant Tests and various other herbicides for the Non-Glyphosate Resistant/Special Traits Tests and additional hand weeding was done as required. Management details varied from location to location and are specified in the regional crop management summaries. Data Recorded: Maturity group classification is provided by the entry sponsor. Maturity data are recorded when approximately 5 percent of the pods have turned color. Lodging and height are determined immediately before harvest. A scale of to 5 is used to score lodging. Interpretation of the scale is as follows: = all plants erect, = all plants leaning moderately or 0% to 50% down, 5 = all plants down. Data on maturity, plant height, lodging and yield are given for each entry and location. Yield is measured in bushels (60 pounds) per acre at a moisture content of.0 percent. An electronic moisture tester is used for all moisture readings. All soybean locations were tested for the presence of SCN eggs in the soil before planting. Every effort was made to locate the test sites in fields of low to moderate levels of SCN. These numbers are given in the heading information of each table. Accessibility of Data: The results of the 008 crop performance tests are also available online at: varietytesting.missouri.edu. If you need assistance in accessing the system; call for help. Field Plot Design. Statistical designs used to analyze the field data included randomized lattice with three replications and randomized complete block with four replications, depending on the size of the test. Individual plots were four rows wide for the 5-inch row spacing and two rows wide for the 0-inch row spacing with a row length of 5 feet for both. All four rows of each plot were harvested for the 5 inch row spacing test and both rows of each plot were harvested for the 0-inch row spacing to determine yield. Locations: On the basis of geographical characteristics, the state was divided into regions. Glyphosate Resistant and Non- Glyphosate Resistant/Special Traits soybean varieties were evaluated at twenty test sites in nineteen counties throughout the state. Test locations are shown on the adjacent map. North Missouri. Steve Cunningham farm, Craig (Holt Co.). Hundley-Whaley Research Center, Albany (Gentry Co.). Beetsma farm, Mooresville (Livingston Co.). Greenley Memorial Center, Novelty (Knox Co.) 5. Roger Tiemann farm, LaGrange (Lewis Co.) Central Missouri 6. John Williams farm, Henrietta (Ray Co.). Ryland and Fred Utlaut farm, Grand Pass (Saline Co.) 8. Bradford Research and Extension Center. Columbia (Boone Co.) 9. Roy Cope farm, Truxton (Montgomery Co.) 0. Bob Burkemper farm, Annada (Pike Co.) Southwest Missouri. Roth farm, Harrisonville (Cass Co.). Darrel Tenholder farm, Adrian (Bates Co.). Kurt Gretzinger farm, Urich (Henry Co.). Steve Cubbage farm, Nevada (Vernon Co.) 5. Wally Norton farm, Lamar (Barton Co.) Southeast Missouri 6. Martin Eftink farm, Chaffee (Scott Co.). Tom Jennings farm, Morehouse (New Madrid Co.) 8. Scott Morgan farm, Dexter (Stoddard Co.) 9. Delta Research Center (Loam and Clay), Portageville (Pemiscot Co.)
6 North Region Crop Management Summary There are five locations in the North Region for Glyphosate Resistant and Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Traits Soybean Tests this year. They are located in counties where a significant number of acres of soybean are grown according to the Missouri Agricultural Statistics Service. Cultural practices vary slightly between locations, but tend to reflect those followed by farmers in the area. Soybean yields at of the five locations were good this year, even though rainfall was far above normal for most of the North Region. The LaGrange site was abandoned after it was flooded when the levee on the Mississippi River there was topped in mid- June and stayed under water for several weeks. Yield information for the Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Traits Test at Novelty was not reported due to extreme variability across the test. Heavy rains after planting reduced stands in that portion of the field. Climatological information for the growing season (May September 0) for the North Region is summarized below and cultural practices for each site are listed in Table. Average temperature = 69.6 degrees, equal to normal Average precipitation = 0., 8.9 above normal Table. North Region Crop Management Summary Planting Harvest Fertilizer Herbicide Location date date N P 0 5 K 0 Tillage Pre Post Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Tests Craig Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Roundup WeatherMax Authority Albany Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Roundup WeatherMax Authority Mooresville , Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Roundup WeatherMax -05 Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Novelty No-Till Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Roundup WeatherMax LaGrange Flooded Conventional Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Traits Soybean Tests Craig Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority Albany Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority Mooresville Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Select Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Novelty No-Till Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Select LaGrange 05-5 Flooded Conventional Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority 5
7 TABLE. Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Test North Region: Craig, MO (Holt County) Soil Type: Blencoe Silt Clay Soil Test: ph=.6, OM=.5%, P=, K=066 Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: 65 Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=5., June=6.5, July=., Aug.=0.8, Sept.=6. Total=0.5 in. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP Prairie Brand PB-99NRR ** G Genetics Pioneer 9Y * 50.8* NK S9-A Brand * G Genetics * Morsoy RT 8N * Mersch. Eisenhower 9RR Lewis 968,,, * 9.* NK S-P5 Brand * MPG 609nRR * MPG 808nRR * Prairie Brand PB-858NRRS Morsoy RT 80N Morsoy RT N Dyna-Gro X NuTech NT NuTech NT-86 Crow's C96R G Genetics NuTech NT Prairie Brand PB-96NRR NuTech NT-5 Fontanelle 989 NRR Mersch. Madison 98RR,, 0-0. Taylor 98RRS 5, Fontanelle 9680 NRR Morsoy RT 858N Mersch. Grant 95RR,, Dyna-Gro 5G Stone A68NRR Renze R88RRcn Kruger K-8RR/SCN NK S-F Brand None * Pioneer 9M * 5.5 Asgrow AG Asgrow AG NK S5-T9 Brand Fontanelle MPG 908nRR/STS G Genetics Morsoy RT 88N Prairie Brand PB-89NRRS Renze R599RRcn Dyna-Gro SXO Midwest Seed Gen. GR
8 TABLE. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre Kruger K-8RR/SCN None MUExp-966 Mersch. Kennedy 86RR,, Morsoy RT 96N NC+ A86RS Morsoy RT 508N 9-. Stone 6NRR Asgrow AG Midland MG 8NRR NK S-R Brand Lewis 909, Asgrow AG0 Morsoy RT 80N Asgrow AG Midland MG 99NRR 0-0. Midland MG 9A85NRS Prairie Brand PB-6NRR Kruger K-89RR/SCN None * NuTech NT-909+ RR/SCN Prairie Brand PB-598NRR Kruger K-9RR/SCN None 9-.6 Lewis 599 Kruger K-RR/SCN, None ** 5. Asgrow AG Dyna-Gro SXO8STS/RR 9-5. Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Midland MG 9NRR Taylor 5RR 5, Dyna-Gro 8R Kruger K-RR/SCN None NuTech NT-888 RR/SCN Dyna-Gro 5F Stine Kruger K-6RR/SCN None Kruger K-RR/SCN None Dyna-Gro 8B GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT C.V. % MATURITY GROUP MPG 09nRR ** NuTech NT- NuTech NT- RR/SCN * 6.0** Asgrow AG Midland MG 5NRS Prairie Brand PB-5NRRS NuTech NT-8 NC+ A5RS * 50. Mersch. Norfolk RR,, * 9.9 Prairie Brand PB-058NRRS
9 TABLE. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre Crow's C9R NuTech NT-06 Mersch. Memphis 9RR,, * 50. Kruger K-0RR/SCN None Kruger K-RR/SCN None Kruger K-RR/SCN None Mersch. Phoenix 90RR G Genetics,, Lewis 009, Stine * 9. G Genetics Dyna-Gro 6C Pioneer 9Y Midwest Seed Gen. GR Kruger K-9RR/SCN None Dyna-Gro R Morsoy RT 05N Kruger K-8RR/SCN None NuTech NT Dyna-Gro Y Mersch. Santa Fe 95RR,, Prairie Brand PB-98NRRS Fontanelle MUExp GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT.0 NS.5 C.V. % Data not available. ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. NS Not Significant + Seed Treatments: = Allegiance (Metalaxyl); = Apron Maxx (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil); = Apron XL (Mefenoxam); = Cruiser (Thiamethoxam); 5= Cruiser Maxx (Thiamethoxam, Fludioxonil, Mefenoxam); 6= Dynasty (Azoxystrobin); = Gaucho (Imidacloprid) 8= Maxim XL (Fludioxonil); 9= Molybdenum; 0= Soygard (Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin); = Trilex (Trifloxystrobin); = Warden (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil) 8
10 TABLE. Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Test North Region: Albany, MO (Gentry County) Soil Type: Grundy Silt Loam Soil Test: ph=6.6, OM=.%, P=, K=66 Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: 99 Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=., June=9., July=.6, Aug.=., Sept.=.5 Total=. in. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP NK S-P5 Brand ** 6.* 55.6 NuTech NT-86 NK S9-A Brand *.* Taylor 98RRS 5, 0-0.* Renze R88RRcn 9-9.* Mersch. Kennedy 86RR,, 0-0.0* Morsoy RT 858N G Genetics * 6.5* G Genetics * MPG 609nRR * Pioneer 9Y * NK S-R Brand Mersch. Eisenhower 9RR,, * 5.* NuTech NT * NuTech NT * Asgrow AG * NuTech NT-5 Morsoy RT N *.5* Crow's C96R Prairie Brand PB-858NRRS Morsoy RT 88N Morsoy RT 80N Taylor 5RR 5, ** NK S5-T9 Brand Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Prairie Brand PB-99NRR Morsoy RT 8N Prairie Brand PB-96NRR Morsoy RT 80N Lewis 909, Prairie Brand PB-6NRR Kruger K-RR/SCN Mersch. Grant 95RR None,, NuTech NT-909+ RR/SCN Midwest Seed Gen. GR Midland MG 9A85NRS G Genetics 9 NC+ A86RS Mersch. Madison 98RR,, Kruger K-8RR/SCN None * 5.6 Dyna-Gro 5G Fontanelle 989 NRR Midland MG 8NRR Dyna-Gro X Stone A68NRR
11 TABLE. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre NK S-F Brand Stine 60- Renze R599RRcn Asgrow AG * 5.5 Prairie Brand PB-89NRRS 9-0. Pioneer 9M Lewis 968 NuTech NT-888 RR/SCN, Morsoy RT 96N Dyna-Gro 5F MUExp G Genetics 8 Dyna-Gro 8R Fontanelle 9680 NRR MPG 808nRR MPG 908nRR/STS Prairie Brand PB-598NRR Kruger K-9RR/SCN None Asgrow AG Asgrow AG Fontanelle Morsoy RT 508N Dyna-Gro 8B Stone 6NRR Asgrow AG Kruger K-RR/SCN None 9-8. Kruger K-89RR/SCN Midland MG 99NRR None Lewis 599, Midland MG 9NRR 9-.5 Dyna-Gro SXO Kruger K-RR/SCN Kruger K-8RR/SCN None None Dyna-Gro SXO8STS/RR Kruger K-6RR/SCN None * 9.5 Asgrow AG GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT.0.. C.V. %. 5.0 MATURITY GROUP Morsoy RT 05N ** NuTech NT- Prairie Brand PB-058NRRS * 5.9* 55.* 5. Asgrow AG * Pioneer 9Y * MPG 09nRR * Prairie Brand PB-5NRRS NuTech NT * 5.0* 5.* 5. NuTech NT- RR/SCN 0-0.9* 56.5* 50. NuTech NT * 58.5* 5.5 0
12 TABLE. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre G Genetics 0-0.* NuTech NT-06 Prairie Brand PB-98NRRS * 50. NC+ A5RS G Genetics Mersch. Norfolk RR,, * 50. Mersch. Memphis 9RR Midwest Seed Gen. GR,, Kruger K-RR/SCN None Kruger K-RR/SCN None Mersch. Santa Fe 95RR,, Crow's C9R Fontanelle Midland MG 5NRS Dyna-Gro Y Dyna-Gro R Dyna-Gro 6C Stine Kruger K-0RR/SCN None * 9.5 Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Mersch. Phoenix 90RR,, Lewis 009 Kruger K-9RR/SCN, None MUExp GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT.0.6. C.V. % 5.. Data not available. ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. + Seed Treatments: = Allegiance (Metalaxyl); = Apron Maxx (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil); = Apron XL (Mefenoxam); = Cruiser (Thiamethoxam); 5= Cruiser Maxx (Thiamethoxam, Fludioxonil, Mefenoxam); 6= Dynasty (Azoxystrobin); = Gaucho (Imidacloprid) 8= Maxim XL (Fludioxonil); 9= Molybdenum; 0= Soygard (Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin); = Trilex (Trifloxystrobin); = Warden (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil)
13 TABLE. Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Test North Region: Mooresville, MO (Livingston County) Soil Type: Grundy Silt Loam Soil Test: ph=6.0, OM=.6%, P=8, K=66 Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=5.0, June=8., July=6.6, Aug.=., Sept.=9. Total=. in. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP Dyna-Gro 5F NK S9-A Brand ** 5.5* Morsoy RT 88N * 6.5* 9. NK S-F Brand G Genetics * 5.*.8.6 Taylor 5RR NK S-P5 Brand 5, * 5.* Midwest Seed Gen. GR *.9* 8. NuTech NT-99 NuTech NT-888 RR/SCN * 5.*.* Dyna-Gro X9 Pioneer 9M * 5.*.*. Kruger K-8RR/SCN None *.* 8.8 NK S5-T9 Brand Taylor 98RRS 5, * 9.8* 5.5*. Stine 60- NuTech NT * 9.6*.9* 6.8 Asgrow AG * Stone 6NRR NuTech NT-909+ RR/SCN * 9.*.9*.* MPG 908nRR/STS Mersch. Kennedy 86RR,, * 8.8* Midland MG 8NRR * G Genetics Lewis 968, * 8.*. 5.8 Midland MG 9A85NRS Morsoy RT 858N * 8.* 5.8*.0 NuTech NT * Asgrow AG80 Asgrow AG *.8* 6.5*.. 5. Dyna-Gro SXO88 NC+ A86RS *.6* Crow's C96R 0-0.*.*. G Genetics Prairie Brand PB-99NRR *.* Asgrow AG50 MPG 609nRR Morsoy RT 96N * 6.8 Prairie Brand PB-89NRRS Kruger K-9RR/SCN None Morsoy RT N Lewis 599, Fontanelle 989 NRR Renze R88RRcn NK S-R Brand
14 TABLE. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre Dyna-Gro 8R Dyna-Gro SXO8STS/RR Prairie Brand PB-96NRR * 5.5 Morsoy RT 80N * 6. Dyna-Gro 5G Asgrow AG Fontanelle 9 Kruger K-89RR/SCN None * 5.8 MPG 808nRR *. Mersch. Madison 98RR,, 0-0. Pioneer 9Y Morsoy RT 80N Lewis 909, * 5.8 Prairie Brand PB-598NRR 9-8. Mersch. Grant 95RR,, 9-. Kruger K-6RR/SCN None Kruger K-RR/SCN Mersch. Eisenhower 9RR None,, Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Midland MG 99NRR Morsoy RT 8N Asgrow AG05 Fontanelle 9680 NRR *.8 MUExp G Genetics Kruger K-RR/SCN None 9-0. Dyna-Gro 8B Renze R599RRcn Stone A68NRR Prairie Brand PB-858NRRS Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Kruger K-RR/SCN NuTech NT-5 None Prairie Brand PB-6NRR *. Morsoy RT 508N Midland MG 9NRR GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT C.V. %.0.9 MATURITY GROUP NuTech NT **.* 9. G Genetics NuTech NT * 5.*.9* 8. Asgrow AG * NuTech NT- RR/SCN *.8* 8. Pioneer 9Y * Dyna-Gro 6C Prairie Brand PB-98NRRS * 5.* Mersch. Santa Fe 95RR,, * Kruger K-0RR/SCN None *
15 TABLE. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre Fontanelle * NuTech NT-06 G Genetics * 5.0*.*. Lewis 009, * Prairie Brand PB-058NRRS * Dyna-Gro R * Kruger K-RR/SCN Midland MG 5NRS None * 50.8* MPG 09nRR * NuTech NT * Crow's C9R * Midwest Seed Gen. GR NC+ A5RS * 9.* Mersch. Memphis 9RR,, * Kruger K-RR/SCN None * 6. Mersch. Norfolk RR,, * 5. Morsoy RT 05N Stine * 5. Prairie Brand PB-5NRRS * 5. Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Dyna-Gro Y Kruger K-9RR/SCN Mersch. Phoenix 90RR None,, MUExp GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT C.V. % Data not available. ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. + Seed Treatments: = Allegiance (Metalaxyl); = Apron Maxx (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil); = Apron XL (Mefenoxam); = Cruiser (Thiamethoxam); 5= Cruiser Maxx (Thiamethoxam, Fludioxonil, Mefenoxam); 6= Dynasty (Azoxystrobin); = Gaucho (Imidacloprid) 8= Maxim XL (Fludioxonil); 9= Molybdenum; 0= Soygard (Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin); = Trilex (Trifloxystrobin); = Warden (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil)
16 TABLE 5. Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Test North Region: Novelty, MO (Knox County) Soil Type: Putnam Silt Loam Soil Test: ph=5.6, OM=., P=0, K= Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: 9 Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=., June=0., July=0., Aug.=., Sept.=.9 Total=. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP Dyna-Gro SXO8STS/RR Prairie Brand PB-96NRR ** 60.8* NuTech NT-888 RR/SCN * Crow's C96R NK S-R Brand * 60.* Taylor 5RR Midwest Seed Gen. GR9 5, * 58.* NK S5-T9 Brand * Asgrow AG80 Dyna-Gro 5G * 58.0* 66.* 6. Stone A68NRR Morsoy RT 80N * 5.* 68.9* 6. NK S-F Brand * NuTech NT-86 Mersch. Eisenhower 9RR,, * 56.5* NK S9-A Brand Prairie Brand PB-6NRR * 56.* Asgrow AG * 6.8* 6.0 G Genetics Morsoy RT 88N * 55.* 6.* 6.5 NC+ A86RS NK S-P5 Brand * 55.* Prairie Brand PB-858NRRS * G Genetics Lewis 909, * 55. Kruger K-8RR/SCN Stine 60- None ** 6. Pioneer 9M Kruger K-8RR/SCN Pioneer 9Y0 None G Genetics 9 Morsoy RT 858N MPG 908nRR/STS NuTech NT-5 NuTech NT * 6.8 Morsoy RT 8N Kruger K-6RR/SCN None Fontanelle 9680 NRR Taylor 98RRS Midland MG 8NRR 5, * 59. NuTech NT-909+ RR/SCN Mersch. Madison 98RR,, * 59.6 Kruger K-RR/SCN None * 58.8 MPG 808nRR NuTech NT *
17 TABLE 5. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre Renze R599RRcn Mersch. Kennedy 86RR Prairie Brand PB-89NRRS,, Dyna-Gro X Mersch. Grant 95RR,, Dyna-Gro 8B Fontanelle 989 NRR MPG 609nRR Asgrow AG * 58. Morsoy RT 80N G Genetics Lewis 968 Prairie Brand PB-99NRR, Dyna-Gro SXO Asgrow AG Kruger K-RR/SCN None Stone 6NRR Midland MG 9A85NRS Morsoy RT 96N * 5.6 Renze R88RRcn Midland MG 9NRR Midland MG 99NRR Morsoy RT 508N Morsoy RT N Prairie Brand PB-598NRR Asgrow AG Kruger K-89RR/SCN MUExp-966 None Dyna-Gro 8R Asgrow AG * 56. Kruger K-9RR/SCN None Kruger K-RR/SCN Dyna-Gro 5F None Lewis 599, 9-6. Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Fontanelle GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT C.V. % MATURITY GROUP Fontanelle ** MPG 09nRR Asgrow AG * 60.* Kruger K-RR/SCN None * Crow's C9R * Kruger K-0RR/SCN None * 60.* 59. Prairie Brand PB-058NRRS Dyna-Gro R * 5.* NuTech NT * 60.* 59. NuTech NT * 6
18 TABLE 5. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre Mersch. Norfolk RR,, * G Genetics 0 Prairie Brand PB-5NRRS * 55.* 60.6* 58.0 NuTech NT- RR/SCN * 6.* 58.8 Midland MG 5NRS * Midwest Seed Gen. GR * NuTech NT-8 Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Lewis 009, NuTech NT * 5. Mersch. Memphis 9RR,, Pioneer 9Y0 NC+ A5RS G Genetics 0-5. Prairie Brand PB-98NRRS Dyna-Gro 6C Mersch. Santa Fe 95RR Dyna-Gro Y5,, Kruger K-9RR/SCN None Kruger K-RR/SCN None MUExp Morsoy RT 05N Stine Mersch. Phoenix 90RR,, GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT.0.. C.V. % 0..9 Data not available. ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. + Seed Treatments: = Allegiance (Metalaxyl); = Apron Maxx (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil); = Apron XL (Mefenoxam); = Cruiser (Thiamethoxam); 5= Cruiser Maxx (Thiamethoxam, Fludioxonil, Mefenoxam); 6= Dynasty (Azoxystrobin); = Gaucho (Imidacloprid) 8= Maxim XL (Fludioxonil); 9= Molybdenum; 0= Soygard (Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin); = Trilex (Trifloxystrobin); = Warden (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil)
19 TABLE 6. Performance Summary for Glyphosate Resistant Varieties evaluated at Four North Missouri locations (Craig, Albany, Mooresville, Novelty) during 008. Craig Planted: 6- Harvested: 0- Growing Season Rainfall: 0.5 in. Irrigation: Mooresville Planted: 6- Harvested: -, 5 Growing Season Rainfall:. in. Irrigation: Albany Planted: 05-9 Harvested: 0-0 Growing Season Rainfall:. in. Irrigation: Novelty Planted: 5-9 Harvested: 0-8 Growing Season Rainfall:. Irrigation: Yield (Bu/Acre) Brand-Variety Craig Albany Mooresville Novelty Mean MATURITY GROUP NK S9-A Brand 50.*.* 5.5* 56.* 5.** NK S-P5 Brand 9.* 8.9** 5.* 55.* 5.* G Genetics NuTech NT *. 6.*.*.* 8.0* 55.* 56.* 50.0* 50.0* Crow's C96R...* 60.* 9.9* NK S5-T9 Brand * 58.6* 9.5* Midwest Seed Gen. GR * 58.* 9.* Morsoy RT 88N NK S-F Brand * 5.* 55.* 5.* 9.* 9.* NuTech NT * 9.6* * G Genetics * 5. 9.* NuTech NT * 5.5* 5. 9.* Prairie Brand PB-96NRR Taylor 98RRS..0.6.*.9 9.8* 60.8* * 9.* G Genetics * 8.6* 55.8* 9.0* Morsoy RT 858N * 8.* * NK S-R Brand.8 5.9* * 8.8* Pioneer 9Y0 Morsoy RT 80N 50.8* * * 8.8* 8. Mersch. Eisenhower 9RR 9.5* 5.* * 8. Taylor 5RR * 59.* 8. Prairie Brand PB-99NRR 5.**..* Asgrow AG80 Kruger K-8RR/SCN * 50.* 58.* Dyna-Gro X * MPG 609nRR 9.* 6.* Pioneer 9M * Mersch. Kennedy 86RR NuTech NT-888 RR/SCN. 9..0*. 8.8* 5.* * Dyna-Gro 5G *.9 NC+ A86RS..6.6* 55.*. Morsoy RT 8N 9.8* Asgrow AG05 Lewis * 5.*..8 8.* 56.* MPG 908nRR/STS * 5.9. Prairie Brand PB-858NRRS *.0 Renze R88RRcn 6..* Morsoy RT N Midland MG 8NRR * * NuTech NT-909+ RR/SCN..0 9.*
20 Table 6. Continued. Yield (Bu/Acre) Brand-Variety Craig Albany Mooresville Novelty Mean Fontanelle 989 NRR MPG 808nRR. 9.* Lewis Stone A68NRR Mersch. Madison 98RR * NuTech NT-5 Stine * * Mersch. Grant 95RR Prairie Brand PB-89NRRS Dyna-Gro SXO8STS/RR ** Midland MG 9A85NRS G Genetics * * Stone 6NRR * Kruger K-8RR/SCN Asgrow AG * Fontanelle 9680 NRR Morsoy RT 80N Prairie Brand PB-6NRR * 5. Morsoy RT 96N Renze R599RRcn Dyna-Gro SXO88 Asgrow AG *.8* Dyna-Gro 5F **.. Asgrow AG50 Kruger K-RR/SCN Prairie Brand PB-598NRR Kruger K-9RR/SCN Midland MG 99NRR MUExp-966 Kruger K-89RR/SCN Kruger K-6RR/SCN Dyna-Gro 8R Fontanelle Morsoy RT 508N Lewis Kruger K-RR/SCN Asgrow AG Dyna-Gro 8B Kruger K-RR/SCN Midland MG 9NRR Kruger K-8RR/SCN GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT C.V. % MATURITY GROUP Asgrow AG * 5.* 60.* 50.6** NuTech NT-.5.* 5.* 5.* 50.6** MPG 09nRR.8** 5.6* 9.9* 60.6* 50.0* NuTech NT- RR/SCN.5.9* 5.* 55.* 9.* 9
21 Table 6. Continued. Yield (Bu/Acre) Brand-Variety Craig Albany Mooresville Novelty Mean Prairie Brand PB-058NRRS NuTech NT *.5* 5.* 55.0** 58.* * 8.* Kruger K-RR/SCN * 59.* 8.0* Kruger K-0RR/SCN Crow's C9R * 9.6* 58.6* 58.9*.9*.6* Fontanelle 0 Pioneer 9Y * 5.* 5.* 6.0** 5... G Genetics * 55.*. Midland MG 5NRS NuTech NT * 5.* 5.* G Genetics NuTech NT * 5.0* 5.* 9.8* *..0 Prairie Brand PB-5NRRS. 5.5* * 6.9 Mersch. Norfolk RR Dyna-Gro R * 55.8* 5.* NC+ A5RS Mersch. Memphis 9RR * 8.* Midwest Seed Gen. GR * 5.6* 5.9 Prairie Brand PB-98NRRS Lewis * 5.0* Dyna-Gro 6C Mersch. Santa Fe 95RR * 5.0* Kruger K-RR/SCN Kruger K-8RR/SCN Morsoy RT 05N ** Dyna-Gro Y5 Stine Kruger K-9RR/SCN MUExp-0 Mersch. Phoenix 90RR GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT.0 NS C.V. % ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. Note: To view seed treatments for these varieties refer to the location table or the characteristics chart. 0
22 TABLE. Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Traits Soybean Test North Region: Craig, MO (Holt County) Soil Type: Blencoe Silt Clay Soil Test: ph=.6, OM=.5%, P=, K=066 Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: 65 Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=5., June=6.5, July=., Aug.=0.8, Sept.=6. Total=0.5 in. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score 008 Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP Schillinger 88.TC ** High Yield Check * High Yield Check * MPG 5CN * MPV 8N High Yield Check Schillinger 5.TCS Schillinger.TC Asoyia 86SCN, 5, Schillinger 8F.HPC Schillinger 8F.HPC Asoyia 5SCN, 5, 9-. Asoyia 08, 5, 9-9. Asoyia 06SCN, 5, GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT.0 C.V. %.5 8. Data not available. ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. + Seed Treatments: = Allegiance (Metalaxyl); = Apron Maxx (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil); = Apron XL (Mefenoxam); = Cruiser (Thiamethoxam); 5= Cruiser Maxx (Thiamethoxam, Fludioxonil, Mefenoxam); 6= Dynasty (Azoxystrobin); = Gaucho (Imidacloprid) 8= Maxim XL (Fludioxonil); 9= Molybdenum; 0= Soygard (Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin); = Trilex (Trifloxystrobin); = Warden (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil)
23 TABLE 8. Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Traits Soybean Test North Region: Albany, MO (Gentry County) Soil Type: Grundy Silt Loam Soil Test: ph=6.6, OM=.%, P=, K=66 Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: 99 Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=., June=9., July=.6, Aug.=., Sept.=.5 Total=. in. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP MPG 5CN 0-0.** 55.6* 5.5 Schillinger 88.TC High Yield Check *.9* 5.* 9.8 MPV 8N Asoyia 08, 5, 9-. Schillinger 8F.HPC 0-0. High Yield Check High Yield Check * 5.9* Schillinger.TC 0-0. Asoyia 86SCN, 5, * 6. Asoyia 06SCN, 5, Schillinger 5.TCS Schillinger 8F.HPC Asoyia 5SCN, 5, ** 5. GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT.0.5. C.V. %. 5. Data not available. ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. + Seed Treatments: = Allegiance (Metalaxyl); = Apron Maxx (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil); = Apron XL (Mefenoxam); = Cruiser (Thiamethoxam); 5= Cruiser Maxx (Thiamethoxam, Fludioxonil, Mefenoxam); 6= Dynasty (Azoxystrobin); = Gaucho (Imidacloprid) 8= Maxim XL (Fludioxonil); 9= Molybdenum; 0= Soygard (Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin); = Trilex (Trifloxystrobin); = Warden (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil)
24 TABLE 9. Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Traits Soybean Test North Region: Mooresville, MO (Livingston County) Soil Type: Grundy Silt Loam Soil Test: ph=6.0, OM=.6%, P=8, K=66 Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=5.0, June=8., July=6.6, Aug.=., Sept.=9. Total=. in. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP High Yield Check ** 9.8* 9. High Yield Check 0-0.5* 5.** 9.6 Asoyia 08, 5, * MPG 5CN * 8.5*. MPV 8N * High Yield Check 0-0.0*.8* 5.9 Schillinger.TC * Schillinger 88.TC 9-.0* Asoyia 5SCN, 5, Schillinger 8F.HPC Schillinger 5.TCS *.8 Asoyia 86SCN, 5, Asoyia 06SCN, 5, Schillinger 8F.HPC 0-0. GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT.0 C.V. % Data not available. ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. + Seed Treatments: = Allegiance (Metalaxyl); = Apron Maxx (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil); = Apron XL (Mefenoxam); = Cruiser (Thiamethoxam); 5= Cruiser Maxx (Thiamethoxam, Fludioxonil, Mefenoxam); 6= Dynasty (Azoxystrobin); = Gaucho (Imidacloprid) 8= Maxim XL (Fludioxonil); 9= Molybdenum; 0= Soygard (Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin); = Trilex (Trifloxystrobin); = Warden (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil)
25 TABLE 0. Performance Summary for Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Traits Varieties evaluated at Three North Missouri locations (Craig, Albany, Mooresville) during 008. Craig Planted: 6- Harvested: 0- Growing Season Rainfall: 0.5 in. Irrigation: Albany Planted: 05-9 Harvested: 0-0 Growing Season Rainfall:. in. Irrigation: Mooresville Planted: 6- Harvested: -, 5 Growing Season Rainfall:. in. Irrigation: Yield (Bu/Acre) Brand-Variety Craig Albany Mooresville Mean MATURITY GROUP MPG 5CN 0.*.** 6.0*.5** Schillinger 88.TC High Yield Check.9** 0.* 5.0*..0*.5*.*.* High Yield Check High Yield Check 0.6* 6..9*..0* 8.8**.*.5* MPV 8N *.* Schillinger.TC.8..8* 0. Asoyia * 9.6 Schillinger 8F.HPC Schillinger 5.TCS Asoyia 86SCN Asoyia 5SCN Schillinger 8F.HPC Asoyia 06SCN GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT C.V. % ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. Note: To view seed treatments for these varieties refer to the location table or the characteristics chart.
26 Central Region Crop Management Summary There are five locations in the Central Region for Glyphosate Resistant and Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Trait Soybean Tests this year. They are located in counties where a significant number of acres of soybean are grown according to the Missouri Agricultural Statistics Service. Cultural practices vary slightly between locations, but tend to reflect those followed by farmers in the area. Yields at all of the five Central Region locations were good this year, even with growing season rainfall that was 65% above normal. The Columbia site was replanted in June because the May planting was mostly drowned out by excessive rain in late May. The Henrietta site was infested with SDS and stink bugs that reduced yields in some areas of the field while leaving other areas with normal growth and yield. The variability in the yield data there was too severe to utilize, so data from that site was not reported. The cooperating farmer at the Grand Pass site had an aerial application of Quadris put on the field in July as a preventative measure against fungal soybean diseases. Climatological information for the growing season (May September 0) for the Central Region is summarized below and cultural practices for each site are listed in Table. Average temperature = 0.0 degrees,. degrees below normal Average precipitation =.5,. above normal Table. Central Region Crop Management Summary Planting Harvest Fertilizer Herbicide Location date date N P 0 5 K 0 Tillage Pre Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Tests Henrietta Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Grand Pass No-Till Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Columbia 06-0-, No-Till Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, 0- Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Truxton No-Till Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Annada Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Non-Glyphosate Resistant / Special Traits Soybean Tests Henrietta Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Grand Pass No-Till Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Columbia No-till Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Truxton No-Till Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Annada Minimum Dual II Magnum, FirstRate, Authority, Roundup WeatherMax Roundup WeatherMax Roundup WeatherMax Roundup WeatherMax Roundup WeatherMax Roundup WeatherMax, Assure II Ultra Blazer, Select Ultra Blazer, Select 5
27 TABLE. Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Test Central Region: Grand Pass, MO (Saline County) Soil Type: Haynie Silt Loam Soil Test: ph=5., OM=.%, P=6, K=9 Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: 66 Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=., June=.0, July=8., Aug.=., Sept.=.0 Total=. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP Stone A88NRR 0-0.** Dyna-Gro 5G8 NK S-R Brand *.9* G Genetics * Midland MG 8NRR 9-6.* 65.* 68.9 Pioneer 9Y * Morsoy RT 88N Kruger K-8RR/SCN None * 0.5* Morsoy RT 80N * Asgrow AG * NK S-F Brand * 69.* 69.6 Fontanelle 9 NK S5-T9 Brand * 69.* Morsoy RT 96N * 6.* 66.9 Dyna-Gro X * Pioneer 9M * Kruger K-8RR/SCN NK S9-A Brand None * 68.* * NK S-P5 Brand * G Genetics * NuTech NT * Lewis 909 Asgrow AG80, Lewis 968, * 66. MPG 808nRR * 6.6 Stone A98NRR Midland MG 99NRR NuTech NT MPG 609nRR Asgrow AG ** 68. Asgrow AG * 66. MPG 908nRR/STS Kruger K-6RR/SCN None Fontanelle 989 NRR Mersch. Eisenhower 9RR,, MIdland MG 99NRR Dyna-Gro 5F Schillinger 98.RCP NuTech NT-909+ RR/SCN Morsoy RT 858N Mersch. Kennedy 86RR,, Kruger K-89RR/SCN Kruger K-RR/SCN None None Midland MG 9A85NRS MUExp
28 TABLE. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MUExp GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT C.V. % MATURITY GROUP NuTech NT- RR/SCN ** 59.* 65.5 Asgrow AG005 Midland MG 9NRR * 68.8* NuTech NT * Mersch. Memphis 9RR,, * Midland MG 89NRS * Pioneer 9Y0 Lewis 009, * 66.5* Kruger K-0RR/SCN None * Asgrow AG * MPG Dyna-Gro 8C Kruger K-RR/SCN None * 6. Asgrow AG NC+ A5RS Morsoy RT N * 6. Stine 8- G Genetics Midland MG 5NRS Stine Mersch. Houston RR,, Mersch. Santa Fe 95RR Mersch. Norfolk RR,,,, NuTech NT MPG 09nRR Kruger K-8RR/SCN None Morsoy RT 0N MPG 509nRR/STS * 6. Dyna-Gro Y Morsoy RT 05N Morsoy RT 8N Mersch. Nashville 9RR Morsoy RT 5N,, * 59. Asgrow AG Crow's C9R Morsoy RT 0N Morsoy RT 6N Kruger K-9RR/SCN None NuTech NT Crow's C59R NK S-D5 Brand Pioneer 9Y0 Lewis 59, Lewis 08, Morsoy RT 85N
29 TABLE. Continued. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MPG 0nRR/STS * 58. MPG 60 NK S-N6 Brand NK S9-Q MPG 06nRR MUExp Kruger K-RR/SCN Midland MG NRR None NK S-R6 Brand Morsoy RTS 8N NK S-D9 Brand GROUP AVERAGE L.S.D. AT C.V. % Data not available. ** Highest yielding variety in the maturity group. * Yield not significantly less than the highest yielding variety in the maturity group. + Seed Treatments: = Allegiance (Metalaxyl); = Apron Maxx (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil); = Apron XL (Mefenoxam); = Cruiser (Thiamethoxam); 5= Cruiser Maxx (Thiamethoxam, Fludioxonil, Mefenoxam); 6= Dynasty (Azoxystrobin); = Gaucho (Imidacloprid) 8= Maxim XL (Fludioxonil); 9= Molybdenum; 0= Soygard (Metalaxyl, Azoxystrobin); = Trilex (Trifloxystrobin); = Warden (Mefenoxam, Fludioxonil) 8
30 TABLE. Glyphosate Resistant Soybean Test Central Region: Columbia, MO (Boone County) Soil Type: Mexico Silt Loam Soil Test: ph=6., OM=.5%, P=9, K= Cyst Nematode Population at Planting: Eggs/00cc of Soil Rainfall: May=., June=., July=8.6, Aug.=.0, Sept.=9. Total=. 008 Yield Maturity Plant Lodging Yr. Brand-Variety Seed Treatment + Date Height Score Mean bu/acre MATURITY GROUP Dyna-Gro 5G ** 9.5* 55.8 Morsoy RT 80N Kruger K-8RR/SCN None * 6.* 9.8* 8.* Stone A88NRR * NK S9-A Brand * 8.6* 5.6 MPG 908nRR/STS *. 5.6 Asgrow AG80 NK S5-T9 Brand * 59.0* 9.* 5.5 NK S-F Brand * Lewis 909, * NK S-R Brand * G Genetics 8 Kruger K-8RR/SCN None ** 5.6 Asgrow AG * 5.8 Midland MG 8NRR Midland MG 99NRR Pioneer 9Y0 Fontanelle 989 NRR G Genetics Morsoy RT 96N NK S-P5 Brand * 5.6 Pioneer 9M6 Morsoy RT 88N MPG 609nRR Fontanelle Morsoy RT 858N Asgrow AG905 NuTech NT Mersch. Kennedy 86RR,, * 50. NuTech NT Lewis 968, NuTech NT-909+ RR/SCN Stone A98NRR * 50.8 Mersch. Eisenhower 9RR,, Kruger K-89RR/SCN None * 50.8 Schillinger 98.RCP Midland MG 9A85NRS MUExp * 9. Kruger K-6RR/SCN None * 50. MPG 808nRR * 50. Asgrow AG Dyna-Gro X9 Kruger K-RR/SCN None MUExp MIdland MG 99NRR
Soybean Missouri Crop Performance
Soybean 007 Missouri Crop Performance Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Hasty, Belt, Schwab, Burdick, Angotti Agriculture Experiment Station - College of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources - University of Missouri-Columbia
More informationGrain Sorghum Missouri Crop Performance
Grain Sorghum 2008 Missouri Crop Performance Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Hasty, Belt, Schwab, Burdick, Angotti Agriculture Experiment Station - College of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources - University
More informationGrain Sorghum Missouri Crop Performance
Grain Sorghum 2007 Missouri Crop Performance Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Hasty, Belt, Schwab, Burdick, Angotti Agriculture Experiment Station - College of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources - University
More informationCONTENTS. Craig 8 Albany 11 Moorseville 14 Novelty 17 Summary of one-year results 20
2013 We Test the Best Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Hasty, Schwab, Angotti, Schelp Agriculture Experiment Station - College of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources - University of Missouri Special Report 591
More informationsorghum MISSOURI CROP PERFORMANCE Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Schwab, Schelp, Stanek, Grissum and Cravens MU Variety Testing Program January 2017
January 2017 MISSOURI CROP PERFORMANCE 2016 sorghum Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Schwab, Schelp, Stanek, Grissum and Cravens MU Variety Testing Program COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD and NATURAL RESOURCES, UNIVERSITY
More informationRefining Soil Test Recommendations for Soybean
Refining Soil Test Recommendations for Soybean Peter Scharf, John Lory, Manjula Nathan, and Bill Wiebold Agronomy Department, University of Missouri Objectives: 1. Test the performance of current University
More informationcorn MISSOURI CROP PERFORMANCE Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Schwab, Angotti, Schelp November 2014
SPECIAL REPORT 594 - November 2014 MISSOURI CROP PERFORMANCE 14 20 corn Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Schwab, Angotti, Schelp Agriculture Experiment Station COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD & NATURAL RESOURCES, UNIVERSITY
More informationcorn MISSOURI CROP PERFORMANCE Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Schwab, Grissum, Cravens, Schelp November 2016
SPECIAL REPORT 601 - November 2016 MISSOURI CROP PERFORMANCE 16 20 corn Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Schwab, Grissum, Cravens, Schelp Agriculture Experiment Station COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD & NATURAL RESOURCES,
More informationcorn MISSOURI CROP PERFORMANCE Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Schwab, Caldwell, Schelp November 2015
SPECIAL REPORT 598 - November 2015 MISSOURI CROP PERFORMANCE 15 20 corn Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Schwab, Caldwell, Schelp Agriculture Experiment Station COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD & NATURAL RESOURCES,
More informationNumber 183 March 27, 2009
Number 183 March 27, 2009 1. Wheat problems in northwest Kansas 1 2. Soybean Cyst Nematode ratings 4 3. Corn population recommendations 9 4. Should corn seeding rates be adjusted for planting dates and
More informationSoybean Varieties. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 987
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties Report of Progress 987 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service standard dryland irrigated double cropped
More informationLONGWOOD, STEELE FARMS
Crop Summary Soil moisture was very high at the time of planting. Just before planting, the soil was lightly disturbed in an effort to dry out the soil enough to plant. The plots were planted in late April
More informationGrain Sorghum Missouri Crop Performance. Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Hasty, Fritts, Adams
Grain Sorghum 22 Missouri Crop Performance Wiebold, Mason, Knerr, Hasty, Fritts, Adams Agricultural Experiment Station College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources University of Missouri-Columbia
More informationRELAY INTERCROP WHEAT-SOYBEAN PRODUCTION UTILIZING GLYPHOSATE AS A WHEAT HARVEST AID TO INCREASE SOYBEAN GRAIN YIELDS AND MAINTAIN WHEAT GRAIN YIELDS
RELAY INTERCROP WHEAT-SOYBEAN PRODUCTION UTILIZING GLYPHOSATE AS A WHEAT HARVEST AID TO INCREASE SOYBEAN GRAIN YIELDS AND MAINTAIN WHEAT GRAIN YIELDS Kelly A. Nelson Research Agronomist Bruce A. Burdick
More informationSoybean Varieties. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 1022
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties Report of Progress 1022 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service standard dryland irrigted double cropped
More informationEvaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa
Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 1997 Gregory L. Tylka & Susan K. Souhrada Department of Plant Pathology Iowa State University Funded, in part, by the Iowa Soybean
More informationRescue N Applications for Corn: Yield Response, Leaf Burn, and Yield Loss Progress Report for 2003
Rescue N Applications for Corn: Yield Response, Leaf Burn, and Yield Loss Progress Report for 2003 Kelly A. Nelson, Peter Scharf, Bruce Burdick, and Gene Stevens Accomplishments for year 1 (2003): Crop
More informationKeeping Up With Research 140
Evaluation of Soybean Varieties for Iron-deficiency Chlorosis Pamela Rzodkiewicz and William Schapaugh Introduction Iron-deficiency chlorosis is a physiological disease caused by decreased iron in the
More informationNORTH CAROLINA Measured Crop Performance Small Grains 2016
NORTH CAROLINA Measured Crop Performance Small Grains 2016 North Carolina State University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Raleigh, NC 27695 Steve
More informationKANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SOYBEAN VARIETIES. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
KANSAS PERFORMANCE TESTS WITH SOYBEAN VARIETIES R E P O R T O F P R O G R E S S 9 3 4 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service dryland irrigated CONTENTS
More information2015 SOYBEAN VARIETY TRIAL REPORT ROUNDUP READY, CONVENTIONAL AND LIBERTYLINK VARIETY TRIALS
2015 SOYBEAN VARIETY TRIAL REPORT ROUNDUP READY, CONVENTIONAL AND LIBERTYLINK VARIETY TRIALS Andy Taylor 1, M.P. Harrison 1, N.W. Buehring 1, Brad Burgess 2 and Tom W. Allen 3 1 Northeast Branch Experiment
More information2012 annual report. Robert G. Hall SDSU Extension Agronomist Kevin K. Kirby Agricultural Research Manager Shawn Hawks Agricultural Research Manager
2012 annual report OCTOBER 2012 SDSU EXTENSION Soybean production is greatly affected by variety selection. This circular reports the agronomic performance of entries in the 2012 South Dakota performance
More informationPioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Dual Column Trial Report SEE NOTES & EXPLANATIONS AT THE END OF REPORT.
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Dual Column Trial Report SEE NOTES & EXPLANATIONS AT THE END OF REPORT. SD-Aurora Bruinsma; Gregory Stickney, SD Tracking Name: FIS10R713107116 Tillage: Conservation
More information2007 Soybean Variety Performance
2007 Soybean Performance C.B. Godsey B. Heister Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Production Technology Report PT 2007-12 Cooperators Curtis Bensch, OK Panhandle Research
More informationSoybean Varieties. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 1040
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties Report of Progress 1040 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service standard dryland irrigted double cropped
More informationSoybean Varieties. Kansas Performance Tests with. Report of Progress 1058
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties Report of Progress 1058 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service standard dryland irrigated double-cropped
More information2012 annual report. Robert G. Hall SDSU Extension Agronomist Kevin K. Kirby Agricultural Research Manager Shawn Hawks Agricultural Research Manager
2012 annual report OCTOBER 2012 SDSU EXTENSION Soybean production is greatly affected by variety selection. This circular reports the agronomic performance of entries in the 2012 South Dakota performance
More information2012 annual report. Robert G. Hall SDSU Extension Agronomist Kevin K. Kirby Agricultural Research Manager Shawn Hawks Agricultural Research Manager
2012 annual report OCTOBER 2012 SDSU EXTENSION Soybean production is greatly affected by variety selection. This circular reports the agronomic performance of entries in the 2012 South Dakota performance
More information2017 Soybean Management Yield Potential. Part 2: Variety Summaries
2017 Soybean Management Yield Potential Part 2: Variety Summaries Alison Vogel and Fred E. Below Crop Physiology Laboratory, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois RESEARCH APPROACH: Understanding
More information2019 Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Tests - Nomination Form - University of Kentucky
2019 Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Tests - Nomination Form - University of Kentucky The Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Tests are conducted to provide an unbiased and objective estimate of
More information2017 Soybean Management Yield Potential. Part 1: Yields
2017 Soybean Management Yield Potential Part 1: Yields Alison Vogel and Fred E. Below Crop Physiology Laboratory, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois RESEARCH APPROACH: Understanding soybean
More information2017 Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Tests Nomination Form University of Kentucky
2017 Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Tests Nomination Form University of Kentucky The Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Tests are conducted to provide an unbiased and objective estimate of the
More informationDELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS
C O O P E R A T I V E B U L L E T I N # 1 2 1 DELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS 2008 University of Delaware College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Agricultural Experiment Station Cooperative
More informationTHE 2014 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS
THE 2014 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Chris D. Kroon Van Diest, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION
More information2012 Kansas Performance Tests with. Soybean Varieties. standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional. Report of Progress 1076
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional Report of Progress 1076 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension
More informationEffect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley
Objective: Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components Shawn P. Conley To quantify the affect of percent crop stand loss and spring nitrogen rate on soft red winter wheat yield.
More informationOKLAHOMA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2009
OKLAHOMA CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2009 PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY CROPS OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCES DIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES & NATURAL RESOURCES OKLAHOMA
More informationDELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS
C O O P E R A T I V E B U L L E T I N # 1 4 2 DELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS 29 University of Delaware College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Agricultural Experiment Station Cooperative
More informationTHE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS
THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS J.D. Bethel, Matthew Hankinson, John McCormick, and Laura Lindsey Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University Extension and OARDC INTRODUCTION
More informationDECISIONS. Agricultural MAKING BETTER. Experiment Station Colorado Soybean Variety Performance Trials
Technical Report TR08-14 December 2008 Agricultural Experiment Station College of Agricultural Sciences Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Arkansas Valley Research Center Extension MAKING BETTER DECISIONS
More informationPublic Soybean Varieties for Indiana (1997)
Agronomy Guide Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service CROPS (SOYBEANS) AY-270 Public Soybean Varieties for Indiana (1997) J. R. Wilcox, T. S Abney and E. P. Christmas USDA-Agricultural Research
More informationSoybean and Corn Hybrid Variety Performance Under Organic and Conventional Systems
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COLLEGE PARK, MD 20742 (301) 405-6241 Soybean and Corn Hybrid Variety Performance Under Organic and Conventional Systems Dr. Robert Kratochvil
More information2015 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WINTHROP Brian Pettis, Sibley County, MN 55396
2015 Soybean Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota South Central [ MNSC ] WINTHROP Brian Pettis, Sibley County, MN 55396 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / TripleFlex, Roundup Early-Season
More information2018 Soybean Management Yield Potential
2018 Soybean Management Yield Potential Alison Vogel and Fred E. Below Crop Physiology Laboratory, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois RESEARCH APPROACH: Understanding soybean yield responses
More informationOptimum Soybean Seeding Rate when Using Cruiser Maxx and Precision Seeding
Optimum Soybean Seeding Rate when Using Cruiser Maxx and Precision Seeding Purpose: This project was designed to assess (2008-2010) if seeding rate requirements are different for Cruiser Maxx treated seed.
More informationGrain Sorghum HYBRID TRIALS, Mississippi. Information Bulletin 489 November 2014 GEORGE M. HOPPER, DIRECTOR
Information Bulletin 489 November 2014 Mississippi Grain Sorghum HYBRID TRIALS, 2014 MISSISSIPPI AGRICULTURAL & FORESTRY EXPERIMENT STATION GEORGE M. HOPPER, DIRECTOR MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY MARK
More informationRESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA
RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA - 2006 The Annual Report of the Investigations at and Administration of the Southern Agricultural Research Center, Huntley,
More informationFinal Report to Delaware Soybean Board
Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board Submitted January 14, 2015 (e-mail) Received January 14, 2015 Delaware Soybean Board (susanne@hammondmedia.com) Evaluating the Response of Full Season and Double
More information2013 Kansas Performance Tests with. Soybean Varieties. standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional. Report of Progress 1094
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional Report of Progress 1094 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension
More informationNORTH CAROLINA MEASURED CROP PERFORMANCE CORN and CORN SILAGE 2016
NORTH CAROLINA MEASURED CROP PERFORMANCE CORN and CORN SILAGE 2016 North Carolina State University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Raleigh, North Carolina
More information2014 GULF COAST UNIFORM CORN HYBRID TRIALS
SCS-2014-06 2014 GULF COAST UNIFORM CORN HYBRID TRIALS Department of Soil and Crop Sciences 1 2014 GULF COAST GRAIN SORGHUM UNIFORM HYBRID TRIALS Ronnie Schnell, Ph.D. Ryan Dambrosky Stephen Biles Kara
More informationEffect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia
Objective: Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia To quantify the affect of percent crop stand
More information2017 Evaluation of Soybean Varieties, Jay, Florida
2017 Evaluation of Soybean Varieties, Jay, Florida Jennifer Bearden and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2017 soybean replicated variety trial (OVT) and large plot demonstration trial
More informationGenuity Roundup Ready 2 Yield Soybeans with Acceleron Seed Treatment Products. Aaron Robinson. March 23, 2011
Genuity Roundup Ready 2 Yield Soybeans with Acceleron Seed Treatment Products Aaron Robinson March 23, 2011 Biography Originally from Cameron, Illinois B.A. Biology and Spanish, Washington University in
More informationBACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RESEARCH PROBLEM
2015 Corn Phosphorus & Potassium Fertility Demonstrations/Research Investigator: Dr. Morteza Mozaffari Extension Agent: Allen Davis BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RESEARCH PROBLEM During the last decade corn
More information2017 Corn Management Yield Potential
2017 Corn Management Yield Potential Eric Winans, Alison Vogel, and Fred E. Below Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Table of Contents Research
More informationOKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2008
OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2008 PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY CROPS OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCES DIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES & NATURAL RESOURCES
More informationRESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA
RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA - 2005 The Annual Report of the Investigations at and Administration of the Southern Agricultural Research Center, Huntley,
More informationNORTH CAROLINA MEASURED CROP PERFORMANCE CORN and CORN SILAGE 2015
NORTH CAROLINA MEASURED CROP PERFORMANCE CORN and CORN SILAGE 2015 North Carolina State University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Raleigh, North Carolina
More informationRESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA
RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA - 2004 The Annual Report of the Investigations at and Administration of the Southern Agricultural Research Center, Huntley,
More informationOKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2005
OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2005 PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY CROPS OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCES DIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES & NATURAL RESOURCES
More informationARKANSAS WHEAT Jason Kelley - Wheat and Feed Grains Extension Agronomist September 13, 2017
2017 Wheat Crop Summary and Outlook for 2018 The 2017 Arkansas wheat crop was small in acreage but many producers reported exceptional yields with intensive management. Acreage was at or near record lows
More informationGrain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee
SP639 Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations
More informationKansas State University 2009 Roundup Ready Soybean Varieties
February 12, 2009 TO: FROM: RE: Roundup Ready Soybean Seed Producers Gary Pierzynski Head, Department of Agronomy Kansas State University 2009 Roundup Ready Soybean Varieties Kansas State University is
More informationArkansas soybean producers use several
Chapter 16 Production Systems and Economics by L. Ashlock, W. Mayhew, T. Windham, T. Keisling, R. Klerk, D. Beaty and G. Lorenz Arkansas soybean producers use several different irrigated and non-irrigated
More informationJ. M. Gaska and C. M. Boerboom 1
ROUNDUP READY SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN THE MIDWEST J. M. Gaska and C. M. Boerboom 1 Weed control is a critical component of successful soybean production for almost all of the acres grown each year. Most
More informationWet soils and Soybean Blights
Double crop soybean yield response to seeding rate Wet soils and Soybean Blights Chad Gossman July 6, 2016 Presentation Outline Background Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion
More information2005 Agronomy Update Meetings. Janesville, Platteville, Madison, Fond du Lac, Kimberly, Wausau, Eau Claire, and Sparta
2005 Agronomy Update Meetings Janesville, Platteville, Madison, Fond du Lac, Kimberly, Wausau, Eau Claire, and Sparta January 3-7, 2005 Joe Lauer University of Wisconsin Overview 2004 in review What did
More informationPerformance of Grain Sorghum Hybrids in Louisiana 2012
Performance of Grain Sorghum Hybrids in Louisiana 212 LAES Research Summary No. 195 December 212 Performance of Grain Sorghum Hybrids in Louisiana 212 LAES Research Summary No. 195 This publication and
More informationNutrient Removal Values for Major Agronomic Crops in Missouri Update for 2008 Manjula V. Nathan, Yichang Sun, and David Dunn
Introduction: Nutrient Removal Values for Major Agronomic Crops in Missouri Update for 2008 Manjula V. Nathan, Yichang Sun, and David Dunn Currently the soil Fertility Group is working on revising the
More information2016 South Dakota Liberty Link Soybean Variety Trial Results
Beresford Location: Cooperator: Soil Type: Previous crop: Tillage: Row spacing: Seeding Rate: Herbicide: Insecticide: Date seeded: 5/20/2016 Date harvested: 10/24/2016 Jonathan Kleinjan SDSU Crop Performance
More informationSoybean. Variety Performance Trials 2007 Results. South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service U.S. Department of Agriculture
Soybean Variety Performance Trials Results EC Revised Annually South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service US Department of Agriculture The crop performance trials are available at http://plantscisdstateedu/varietytrials/vartrialhtml
More informationSoybean cyst nematode-resistant soybean varieties for Iowa
Soybean cyst nematode-resistant soybean varieties for Iowa Prepared by Gregory L. Tylka, Department of Plant Pathology Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is widespread in Iowa. The nematode reproduces quickly
More information2016 Soybean Variety Trial
2016 Soybean Variety Trial Dr. Heather Darby, UVM Extension Agronomist Julija Cubins, Julian Post, and Sara Ziegler UVM Extension Crops and Soils Technicians (802) 524-6501 Visit us on the web at: http://www.uvm.edu/extension/cropsoil
More information2015 Kansas Performance Tests with. Soybean Varieties. standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional. Report of Progress 1121
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties standard dryland irrigated double-cropped conventional Report of Progress 1121 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension
More informationOn-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter
On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Growers are continually striving to increase corn yield
More informationVirginia Soybean Variety Evaluation Tests 2005
Virginia Soybean Variety Evaluation Tests 2005 Virginia Soybean Variety Evaluation Tests 2005 David L. Holshouser, Extension Soybean Specialist, Virginia Tech Michael Ellis, Agricultural Technician, Virginia
More informationSoybeans: 2009 Crop Performance Results
South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange SDSU Extension Circulars SDSU Extension -9 Soybeans: 9 Crop Performance Results
More informationSOYBEAN. Variety Performance Trials 2009 Results. South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service U.S. Department of Agriculture
SOYBEAN Variety Performance Trials 9 Results EC Revised Annually South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service US Department of Agriculture The crop performance trials are available at http://plantscisdstateedu/varietytrials/vartrialhtml
More informationAgricultural Experiment Station
Technical Report TR08-04 January 2008 Agricultural Experiment Station College of Agricultural Sciences Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Arkansas Valley Research Center Extension MAKING BETTER DECISIONS
More informationDESCRIPTION OF THE TESTS
PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY--CROPS PERFORMANCE OF FORAGE BERMUDAGRASS VARIETIES IN OKLAHOMA TESTS, 1998-2003 C. M. Taliaferro, G. L. Williams, T. G. Pickard, D. W. Hooper, and R. D. Kochenower Department of
More informationGrain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee 2008
Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee 2008 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations
More informationHigh-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports Volume Issue 5 Kansas Field Research Article 4 January 6 High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction I. A. Ciampitti Kansas
More informationRisk vs. Reward: Can We Resolve Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Questions in Soybean?
Risk vs. Reward: Can We Resolve Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Questions in Soybean? Shawn P. Conley Soybean and Wheat Specialist University of Wisconsin, Madison Today s Soybean Production Systems are Dynamic
More informationGrain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee
Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee SP639 2010 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard D. Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations
More informationTesting Procedures 7
A nnually, Mississippi State researchers evaluate cotton varieties at numerous locations within the cotton growing regions in the state. The purpose of the Mississippi State Official Variety Trials is
More information2017 Kansas Performance Tests with. Sunflower Hybrids. summer fallow dryland irrigated. Report of Progress 1140
2017 Kansas Performance Tests with Sunflower Hybrids summer fallow dryland irrigated Report of Progress 1140 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service TABLE
More informationOKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2007
OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2007 PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY CROPS OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCES DIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES & NATURAL RESOURCES
More informationSoybean. Variety Performance Trials 2008 Results. South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service U.S. Department of Agriculture
Soybean Variety Performance Trials 8 Results EC Revised Annually South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service US Department of Agriculture The crop performance trials are available at http://plantscisdstateedu/varietytrials/vartrialhtml
More informationOn-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter
On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Growers are continually striving to increase corn yield
More informationRice Nitrogen Management- Rates and Timing of Urea Fertilizer Gene Stevens and David Dunn University of Missouri-Delta Research Center
Rice Nitrogen Management- Rates and Timing of Urea Fertilizer Gene Stevens and David Dunn University of Missouri-Delta Research Center Managing nitrogen fertilization in rice fields can be challenging
More informationKANSAS CORN TESTS, 1945
KANSAS CORN TESTS, 1945 SUMMARY This bulletin presents the results of corn tests conducted in Kansas during 1945 and summarizes the results of tests conducted during the past six years. The state has
More information2019 SOYBEANS SEED- AND SOIL-BORNE SOYBEAN DISEASE AND INSECT GUIDE VARIETY SELECTION AND POSITIONING
2019 SOYBEANS SEED- AND SOIL-BORNE SOYBEAN DISEASE AND INSECT GUIDE VARIETY SELECTION AND POSITIONING Table of contents Yield and performance 3 Final population recommendations by management zone 4 Plant
More informationGRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2015, Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield
Wt. Bloom 2 Ht. Lodging Disease 3 bu/acre bu/acre lb/bu days in % rating Dyna-Gro GX13231 74.8 86.5 48.6 63 45 1 2.5 Pioneer 83P17 71.1 81.2 44.5 70 51 0 1.8 Pioneer 84P80 70.3 96.2 48.3 66 39 1 2.8 Alta
More informationSoybean Response to Seeding Rates in 30-Inch Row Spacing
Background Choosing the optimal soybean seeding rate can improve profitability in soybean production. Many recent studies on soybean seeding rates in the High Plains suggest that higher seeding rates may
More informationARKANSAS CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM PROMOTION BOARD PROGRESS REPORT - November 2008
ARKANSAS CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM PROMOTION BOARD PROGRESS REPORT - November 2008 Title: Developing Guidelines for Arkansas Corn and Grain Sorghum Investigator: Jason Kelley - Wheat and Feed Grains Extension
More information2018 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Grain Sorghum Hybrid Trial
SCS-2018-20 2018 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Grain Sorghum Hybrid Trial Department of Soil and Crop Science Texas A&M AgriLife Extension soilcrop.tamu.edu 2018 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Grain Sorghum
More information2017 Kentucky Soybean Production Contest FORM A Agronomic Data Form*
Committee Use Only State Entry #: Official Yield: Oil: Protein: 2017 Kentucky Soybean Production Contest FORM A Agronomic Data Form* 1. Farm Name Contact Name 2. Address: (Route/Street/Hwy. No.) (City,
More informationRow Spacing and Seeding Rate Influence on Spring Canola Performance in the Northern Great Plains
Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Influence on Spring Canola Performance in the Northern Great Plains Bryan Hanson 1, Burton Johnson 2, Travis Hakanson 1, Lawrence Henry 1, Paula Petersen 2 (1)North Dakota
More information