Soybean. Variety Performance Trials 2008 Results. South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service U.S. Department of Agriculture

Transcription

1 Soybean Variety Performance Trials 8 Results EC Revised Annually South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service US Department of Agriculture The crop performance trials are available at

2 Tables for the 8 Soybean Performance Trials A Monthly nearest weather station precipitation totals and average temperature; and their departures from average for 8 B Description of trial locations, soil types, tillage methods, prior crop, herbicide usage, and dates seeded 8 C Gene race resistance to Phytophthora root rot 8 D Glyphosate-resistant entries with yield table numbers 9- E Entrants (brand name) mailing addresses (after yield tables) F Explanation of yield and lodging score table footnotes Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Trial Results a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group- soybean variety yeild and lodging averagesnorthern South Dakota locations, -8 b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group- soybean variety protein and oil averagesnorthern South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety yeild and lodging averagesnorthern South Dakota locations, -8 - b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety protein and oil averagesnorthern South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein - a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group- soybean variety yeild and lodging averagescentral South Dakota locations, -8 8 b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group- soybean variety protein and oil averagescentral South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein 9 a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety yeild and lodging averagescentral South Dakota locations, -8 - b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety protein and oil averagescentral South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein - a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-ii soybean variety yeild and lodging averagescentral South Dakota locations, -8 b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-ii soybean variety protein and oil averagescentral South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety yeild and lodging averagessouthern South Dakota locations, -8 b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety protein and oil averagessouthern South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-ii soybean variety yeild and lodging averagessouthern South Dakota locations, b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-ii soybean variety protein and oil averagessouthern South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein - Non-Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Trial Results 8a Non-glyphosate-resistant maturity group- and -I soybean variety yield and lodging averages- South Shore, -8 8b Non-glyphosate-resistant maturity group- and -I soybean variety protein and oil averages- South Shore, 8 EC Precision Planted Soybeans 8 Crop Performance Results is available electronically on the internet 8pdf South Dakota State University, South Dakota counties, and US Department of Agriculture cooperating South Dakota State University is an Affirmative Action/ Equal Opportunity Employer and offers all benefits, services, education, and employment opportunities without regard for race, color, creed, religion, national origin, ancestry, citizenship, age, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or Vietnam Era veteran status copies printed by CES at a cost of $9 each EC November 8 ii

3 Soybean Variety Performance Trials 8 Results Robert G Hall, Extension agronomist - crops/manager - crop testing Kevin K Kirby, Agricultural research manager crop testing Jesse Hall, Agricultural research manager crop testing Soybean production is greatly affected by variety selection This circular reports the agronomic performance of entries in the 8 South Dakota performance trials for glyphosate-resistant and conventional or non-glyphosate-resistant soybean varieties Major factors in variety selection include yield, maturity, lodging resistance, and Phytophthora root rot resistance General Soybean varieties are classified according to maturity groups that in turn are adapted to maturity zones Maturity zones are based on day length and therefore affected by latitude The very early maturity group- varieties are best suited to Canada and bordering regions of the US, while maturity group-, group- I, and group-ii varieties are suited to South Dakota The later groups III-VIII are suited to Iowa, Nebraska, and south to Texas These soybean trial results are reported according to the prevalent maturity zones in South Dakota (see map) The glyphosate-resistant soybean variety trials were conducted by the following test zones and locations: Northern test zone: Maturity groups- and -I at South Shore and Warner; Central test zone: Maturity groups-, -I, and II at Brookings and Bancroft; Southern test zone: Maturity groups-i and -II at Beresford and Geddes The conventional non-glyphosate-resistant soybean variety trials are conducted at the following SDSU affiliated research farms: Northeast Research Farm, South Shore- Maturity groups- and -I; SDSU Plant Science Farm, Brookings- Maturity groups-, -I, and II; and the Southeast SD Agricultural Experiment Station, Beresford- Maturity groups-i and II There are transition areas where varieties of two maturity groups may perform similarly In such cases rainfall and or elevation may moderate the affect of latitude on maturity In most cases, an earlier maturity group may be seeded in a zone suited to a later maturity group This is only practical if seeding is delayed, or if reseeding following hail, or if double cropping Phytophthora root rot (PRR) is an important soybean disease in South Dakota and is often controlled or managed with the use of resistant varieties Resistance to Phytophthora root rot is fungus-race specific Thus, resistance to one PRR race does not always impart resistance to other races Knowledge of the prevalent PRR races in your area is important If you suspect you have a PRR problem then use of varieties with a wide range of rot resistance is strongly suggested (see discussion of Phytophthora under General Test procedures) An alternative method of control is the use of tolerant varieties Tolerant varieties are not resistant to PRR in the seedling stage Thus, a PRR fungicide must be applied to protect them Currently, we do not evaluate variety field tolerance; therefore, field tolerance ratings are not available Certified seed is the best source of seed and the only way to be assured of the genetic purity of the variety seeded In addition, inoculation of seed with the appropriate nitrogen-fixing bacterium is a good practice Always inoculate if seeding soybeans in soils not previously cropped to soybeans On older soybean soils there is no guarantee that beneficial bacteria will be present to naturally inoculate planted seed Therefore, inoculation of seed at Warner South Shore yale brookings armour beresford Map of Soybean Maturity Zones and Trial Site Locations

4 planting is an inexpensive means of increasing the percentage of plants that will fix nitrogen in the current crop year Yield Yields are obtained from the South Dakota Crop Performance Testing Program (CPT) Current-year yields are included for each entry tested along with -year averages where varieties have been tested for two years Yield test averages and least significant difference (LSD) values are rounded-off to the nearest bushel and printed at the bottom of each yield column The LSD value can be used to determine if varieties differ in yield per acre For example, assume variety A averages bu, B averages bu, and the calculated LSD value is bu The average difference between varieties A and B is bu (-=) Since the average difference of bu is greater than the test LSD value of bu, variety A ( bu) is significantly higher in yield than for B ( bu) In contrast, if variety A averages 8 bu and B averages bu, the average difference would be bu (8-=) In this case, both varieties would have a similar yield average because their difference of bu is less than the test LSD value of bu Use LSD values to identify the best-yielding varieties The LSD value at the bottom of each yield column is used to calculate a minimum top yield value For example, if the highest column yield value is bu, subtract the LSD value of bu to obtain an intermediate value of bu ( = ) The minimum top yield value has to be greater than this intermediate value of bu and since the yield values are rounded to the nearest bushel it must be at least bu Thus, varieties with an average of bu or higher are included in the top-yield group Note: Entries tested for two years may also have a top yield group value in the 8 yield column NOTE: Each company selects the appropriate maturity group trial (maturity group-, -I, or -II trial) and locations for their entries Companies generally have one or more maturity group checks for their varieties There are, however, no standard regional or national check varieties for maturity A late group-i variety from one company may be similar in maturity to an early group-i, or an early group-ii variety from another company because they use different check varieties for maturity Therefore, this testing program does not guarantee that entries are placed in the appropriate maturity group trial Borderline entries with maturity ratings at or near the arbitrary breaks between the late group- s and early group-i s and between the late group-i s and early-group-ii s may crossover in some test trials It is suggested you note the reported maturity rating of every entry you are considering Since all entries at a location are seeded the same day, one can compare the relative difference in days to maturity among varieties tested at that location Use caution when comparing the maturity rating of a variety over many locations Variations in soil moisture and temperature often differ between locations resulting in some maturity variations over locations The efforts of D Doyle, SDSU Agronomy Farm; A Heuer, NE Research Farm, South Shore; and R Berg and staff, SE Research Farm, Beresford in obtaining the data are gratefully acknowledged Also, the assistance and cooperation of our farmer co-operators: Allen and Inel Ryckman, Warner, SD; Curtis Sybesma, Geddes, SD; and Erland Weerts, Bancroft, SD is gratefully acknowledged Protein and Oil Content The 8 protein and oil values (adjusted to a % moisture) were determined using a calibrated FOSS TECATOR Model Infratec 9 Grain Analyzer Three replicates of every variety in each trial were tested Samples of known protein and oil were tested by the SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station Biochemistry Laboratory and were used to calibrate the analyzer Weather and Seasonal Precipitation Seasonal rainfall and its distribution and average temperatures at weather reporting stations nearest each test trial are reported in Table A for the period April to September Seasonal precipitation totals were above average at Aberdeen ( ) and Mitchell ( ); near average at South Shore (- ), Huron ( ), and Centerville (Beresford-SE Farm ); and below average at Brookings (- ) The greatest moisture deficit of -8 from June through August was at Brookings Station temperatures varied from about to -9o below average in April, May, and June; and from -o F in July and August Effects of the cool spring in May that delayed planting or inhibited early seedling growth at some of the locations can be seen in table A General Test Procedures These procedures apply to both the glyphosate-resistant and conventional non-glyphosate-resistant soybean trials except for the chemical weed control imposed Trial locations, soil types, tillage methods, previous crops, pesticide usage, and seeding dates are indicated in table B Test Procedures: A row spacing of inches was used at all locations The seeding rate was, seeds per acre for all varieties and locations Test plots consist of -row plots, feet long, with three replications at all locations Soybean inoculation was accomplished by applying Nitragin brand Soybean Soil Implant down the seed tube, according to label instructions and rates, during seeding Seeding at all locations was accomplished using a Monosem precision row crop planter The center two rows of each plot were harvested for yield Yield: Plots were harvested at % seed moisture or less Yields were calculated on a % moisture content basis and expressed in bushels per acre Harvest was accomplished using a Massey Ferguson 8XP small plot combine Reporting variety maturity: Variety maturity is reported as Days to maturity or DTM Entries are mature when 9% of the pods have turned brown Each maturity value is obtained by determining the average number of days from seeding to maturity for two replicates and expressing as DTM at each location Table DTM values are an average of four replicates (two for each location) unless data is at a location; and in such cases the DTM average is based on two replications Lodging Score: Scores at maturity are based on the erectness of the main stem of plants within each variety = all plants erect, = slight lodging, = some lodging at a o-angle, = severe lodging, and = all plants flat

5 Phytophthora Root Rot (PRR): The gene resistance of each variety to PRR is supplied by each seed company (proprietary entries) or by the USDA (Uniform Soybean Tests, Northern States, public entries) A key for each type of PRR gene and the race resistance it imparts to a variety is given in Table C Specific race resistance to PRR as reported by seed company, can be determined by noting the PRR gene in the variety index table D (glyphosate-resistant) and and referencing the gene back to table C to find the range of race resistance Currently, races -, -, and - are the most common races in South Dakota GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SOYBEAN VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Note: Yield averages are reported -yr (-8) or 8 NORTHERN TEST ZONE SOUTH SHORE- Conventional tillage, Northeast Research Farm WARNER- Minimum-tillage, Allen & Inel Ryckman Farm (farm cooperators) South Shore, Group- (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield differences among the two-year averages were not significant (NS); while the 8 variety yield differences had to differ by bushels to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different values had to average % and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by 9% and %, respectively, to be significantly different South Shore, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average bushels and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for two years and bushels for 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were 9% and 88%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average % and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were 9% and 89%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 99% and % or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by 9% and %, respectively, to be significantly different Warner, Group- (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield differences among the two-year averages were not significant (NS); while the 8 variety yield differences had to differ by bushels to be significantly different Variety lodging score values did not differ among varieties therefore they were not significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were 8% and 8%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average % and 8% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil in 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and 9%, respectively, to be significantly different Northern test zone, Group- (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively, and the lodging score average was (Table a) The effect of variety on yield and lodging score differed significantly between the two locations for both the two-year and 8 periods Growers are encouraged to evaluate varieties by looking at both yield columns and the lodging score column at each location and disregard the Northern zone columns The 8 northern zone protein and oil test averages were 9% and 8%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil Warner, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and 8 bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and 9 bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield differences among the two-year averages were not significant (NS); while the 8 variety yield differences had to differ by bushels to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were 8% and 8%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 9% and 89% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Northern test zone, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Variety yield differences among the twoyear averages were not significant (NS) In contrast, the effect of variety on the 8 yield and lodging score average differed significantly between the two locations in 8 Growers are encouraged to evaluate the yield and lodging resistance potential of varieties by looking at the 8 yield and lodging score columns at each location and disregard the averages of these variables in the Northern zone columns

6 The 8 protein and oil test averages were 88% and 8%, respectively, (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 9% and % or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different CENTRAL TEST ZONE BROOKINGS Conventional tillage, SDSU Plant Science Research Farm BANCROFT- No-till, Erland Weerts (farm cooperator) Brookings, Group- (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average bushels and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for both the two-year and 8 periods to be significantly different Variety lodging score values indicated there was no difference in lodging resistance in the varieties tested in 8 The 8 protein and oil test averages were 9% and 9%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 9% and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Bancroft, Group- (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for 8 and for two years, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for both two years and in 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were % and %, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average % and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Central test zone, Group- (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average bushels and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for two years and bushels for 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were % and 9%, respectively, (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 8% and % or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Brookings, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for 8 and for two years, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for two years and bushel for 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values indicated there was no difference in lodging resistance in the varieties tested in 8 The 8 protein and oil test averages were 8% and 9%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 99% and % or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages both had to differ by % to be significantly different Bancroft, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for 8 and for two years, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for both the twoyear and 8 periods to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were % and %, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average % and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Central test zone, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively, and the lodging score average was (Table a) The effect of variety on yield and lodging score differed significantly between the two locations for both the two-year and 8 periods Growers are encouraged to evaluate varieties by looking at both yield columns and the lodging score column at each location and disregard the Central zone columns The 8 protein and oil test averages were 9% and 9%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 9% and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Brookings, Group-II (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield differences among the two-year averages were not significant (NS); while the 8 variety yield differences had to differ by bushels to be significantly different Variety lodging score values indicated there was no difference in lodging resistance in the varieties tested in 8 The 8 protein and oil test averages were 9% and 88%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to

7 average 9% and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by 9% and %, respectively, to be significantly different Bancroft, Group-II (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield average was and bushels per acre in 8 and for two years, respectively (Table a) Likewise, varieties had to average bushels or higher in 8 and bushel or higher to be in the top yield group for two years Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for two years and for 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were % and 98%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average % and % or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and 8%, respectively, to be significantly different Central test zone, Group-II (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average bushels and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for two years and bushels for 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were 8% and 9%, respectively, (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 9% and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different SOUTHERN TEST ZONE BERESFORD Conventional tillage, Southeast SD Agricultural Experiment Stn GEDDES- No-till, Curtis Sybesma (farm cooperator) Beresford, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average bushels and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for two years and bushels for 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for lodging resistance and had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were 9% and 9%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 8% and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Geddes, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for two years and for 8, respectively Variety yield differences among the two-year averages were not significant (NS); while the 8 variety yield differences had to differ by bushels to be significantly different Variety lodging score values indicated there was no difference in lodging resistance in the varieties tested in 8 The 8 protein and oil test averages were % and 99%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average % and 99% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Southern test zone, Group-I (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively, and the lodging score average was (Table a) The effect of variety on yield and lodging score differed significantly between the two locations for both the two-year and 8 periods Growers are encouraged to evaluate varieties by looking at both yield columns and the lodging score column at each location and disregard the Southern zone columns The 8 protein and oil test averages were 8% and 9%, respectively, (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 8% and 98% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Beresford, Group-II (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for 8 and for two years, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for two years and bushel for 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for resisting lodging and lodging values had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were % and 9%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 8% and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Geddes, Group-II (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table a) Varieties had to average and bushels or higher to be in the top yield group for 8 and for two years, respectively Variety yield averages had to differ by bushels for both two years and for 8 to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal to be in the top performance group for resisting lodging and lodging values had to differ by to be significantly different

8 The 8 protein and oil test averages were % and 9%, respectively (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average 8% and 99% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different Southern test zone, Group-II (Tables a & b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively, and the lodging score average was (Table a) The effect of variety on yield and lodging score differed significantly between the two locations for both the two-year and 8 periods Growers are encouraged to evaluate varieties by looking at both yield columns and the lodging score column at each location and disregard the Southern zone columns The 8 protein and oil test averages were 8% and 9%, respectively, (Table b) Variety protein and oil values had to average % and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein and oil averages had to differ by % and %, respectively, to be significantly different NON-GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SOYBEAN VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Note: Yield averages are reported -yr (-8) or 8 SOUTH SHORE Conventional tillage, Northeast Research Farm South Shore, Group- (Tables 8a & 8b): The two-year and 8 test-yield averages were and bushels per acre, respectively (Table 8a) Varieties had to average bushels or higher for two years and bushels or higher for 8 to be in the top yield group There were no significant differences in yield average among the varieties tested for two years; while in 8 averages had to differ by bushel to be significantly different Variety lodging score values had to equal or lower to be in the top performance group for lodging and lodging values had to differ by to be significantly different The 8 protein and oil test averages were % and 8%, respectively (Table 8b) Variety protein and oil values had to average % and 9% or higher, respectively, to be in the top groups for protein and oil 8 Variety protein averages had to differ by % to be significantly different Variety oil average differences were non-significant(ns; therefore the varieties did not differ in oil content South Shore, Group-I (Tables 8a & 8b): There was only one entry in this trial so there were no differences in yield, lodging score, protein, and oil content to compare

9 Table A Nearest weather station precipitation accumulation and average daily tempeatures for each growing season month in 8 and their departures from average (DFA) Source: South Dakota Office of Climate and Weather Monthly data - April to September Station (Test site) Variable Total April May June July Aug Sept Aberdeen Airport (Warner) South Shore (NE Farm) Huron (Bancroft) Brookings (Agronomy Farm) Centerville, SE (Beresford-SE Farm) Mitchell (Geddes) Precip- inches 8 9- avg AvgTemp -ºF 8 9- avg Precip- inches 8 9- avg AvgTemp -ºF 8 9- avg Precip- inches 8 9- avg AvgTemp -ºF 8 9- avg Precip- inches 8 9- avg AvgTemp -ºF 8 9- avg Precip- inches 8 9- avg AvgTemp -ºF 8 9- avg Precip- inches 8 9- avg AvgTemp -ºF 8 9- avg DFA* DFA DFA DFA DFA DFA DFA DFA DFA DFA DFA DFA * DFA - departure from normal, difference current year is greater or less (-) than the long-term average 9 8 9

10 Table B Description of trial locations- soil type, tillage methods, previous crop, herbicides and inoculants used, and seeding dates Location (County) Warner (Brown) South Shore (Codington) Bancroft (Kingsbury) Brookings (Brookings) Geddes (Chas Mix) Beresford (Clay) Type Conventional Harmony-Aberdeen silty clay loam, -% slope Kranzburg silty clay loam, -% slope Houdek-Stickney- Tetonka loam, -% slope Barnes clay loam, -% slope Highmore-Walke silt loam, -% slope Egan-Clarno-Trent silty clay loam, -% slope Soils & Management Tillage Method Previous crop No-till Corn None Roundup once S Wheat pt, Dual II Magnum Herbicides Applied at label rates Nitragin Soybean Soil Implant Glypohosate Trials Non- glyphosate Trials Down seed tube at label rate Pre Post Pre Post Roundup once No-till Corn None Roundup once S Wheat None Roundup twice No-till Corn None Roundup once Conventional Conventional Corn None Roundup once/ oz Assure Date seeded - - Yes May pt, Dual II Magnum Pursuit Yes May - - Yes May 8 None Harmony/ Poast/ Basagran split Yes May - - Yes June Trial was abandoned following an error in herbicide application Table C Phytophthora root rot race resistance by gene Gene Gene Code Race Resistance rps Rps, Rpsa Rpsb Rpsc Rpsk Rps Rps Rps Rps Rps Rsp Rpsk, Rps Rpsc, Rps Rpsb MIX A B C K K C B MIX None -,-,,-8,,-9,-,8,- -,-,,,,,- -,-,-8,-, -,9- -,8-9,,-,,8,, -,,-,8-, -,8-9,-,8,, -,,,-,8-,,8,9 -,- -,-8,- -9,-,8,-, Resistant & Susceptible Plants Not Reported 8

11 Table D Index to 8 Glyphosate-resistant soybean entries by brand/variety, maturity group, gene code for Phytophthora root rot(prr) resistance as reported by entrants, and performance table number(s) Use table C to determine entry PRR resistance Brand / Variety ASGROW/ AG88 ASGROW/ AG ASGROW/ AG ASGROW/ AG ASGROW/ AG ASGROW/ AG8 ASGROW/ AG ASGROW/ AG8 ASGROW/ AG ASGROW/ AG ASGROW/ AG99 ASGROW/ DKB- ASGROW/ DKB- ASGROW/ DKB- DAIRYLAND/ DSR-9/RR DAIRYLAND/ DSR-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DSR-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DSR-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DSR-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DSR-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DSRRRSTS DAIRYLAND/ DSR8RRSTS DAIRYLAND/ DST-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DST-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DST-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DST-/RR G- GENETICS/ 99 G- GENETICS/ 9 G- GENETICS/ G- GENETICS/ 8 G- GENETICS/ G- GENETICS/ G- GENETICS/ GOLD COUNTRY/ 9RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 9R GOLD COUNTRY/ 98RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 9RR GOLD COUNTRY/ RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 8RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 88R GOLD COUNTRY/ 98RR HEFTY/ R HEFTY/ 8R HEFTY/ 8RN HEFTY/ R LATHAM/ L8R LATHAM/ L98R LATHAM/ L8R LATHAM/ L8R LATHAM/ LR LATHAM/ LR LATHAM/ L8R LATHAM/ LR MUSTANG/ M-89RR MUSTANG/ M-9RR Mat Grp Gene Code K K K K C K C C K C K K K K C K K K K K K K K K K K C C K K K C K Table No(s),,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 9 Brand / Variety HEFTY/ EXP89R HEFTY/ EXP9R HEFTY/ EXP9RN HEFTY/ EXP9RN HEFTY/ EXP99R HEFTY/ EXP9RN HEFTY/ EXP9RN HEFTY/ EXP9RN JGL/ EXP JGL/ EXP JGL/ EXP KALTENBERG/ KB89RR KALTENBERG/ KB9RR KALTENBERG/ KBRR KALTENBERG/ KB9RR KALTENBERG/ KB8RR KRUGER/ EXPKX98R KRUGER/ K-RR KRUGER/ K-8RR KRUGER/ K-+RR KRUGER/ K-9RR KRUGER/ K-9RR KRUGER/ K-RR KRUGER/ K-9RR KRUGER/ K-RR KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-89RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-9RR KRUGER/ K-9+RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-8RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-9RR KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR KRUGER/ K-RR KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN LATHAM/ EXP-E8R LATHAM/ EXP-E9R NUTECH/ NT-88 NUTECH/ NT-99 NUTECH/ NT-88/SCN RR NUTECH/ NT-+RR/SCN NUTECH/ NT-+RR NUTECH/ NT-RR NUTECH/ NT-9+RR/SCN NUTECH/ NT- PIONEER/ 9Y9 PIONEER/ 9M Mat Grp Gene Code K K K C C K A K A K K K K K K K K K C K K K K K K K C K K K K Table No(s),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

12 Table D Index to 8 Glyphosate-resistant soybean entries (Continued) Brand / Variety Mat Grp Gene Code Table No(s) Brand / Variety Mat Grp Gene Code Table No(s) MUSTANG/ M-9RR MUSTANG/ M-9RR MUSTANG/ M-9R MUSTANG/ M-8RR MUSTANG/ M-R 9 K K,, PIONEER/ 9Y PIONEER/ 9M PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB- PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB K K C,,, MUSTANG/ M-9R MUSTANG/ M-99RR MUSTANG/ M-RR MUSTANG/ M-9R MUSTANG/ M-R 9 9 C K,, PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-89 PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB- PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB- PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB ,, MUSTANG/ M-9RR MUSTANG/ M-RR MUSTANG/ M-R MUSTANG/ M-RR MUSTANG/ M-R K K, PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-9RR 9 9 K K K K MUSTANG/ M-8RR MUSTANG/M-RR NORTHSTAR/ NS RR NORTHSTAR/ NS RR NORTHSTAR/ NS RR C C, PRAIRIE BR/ PB-9RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-9RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8R 9 9 K,, NORTHSTAR/ NS RR NUTECH/ NUTECH/ NUTECH/ NUTECH/ 9 K,,, PRAIRIE BR/ PB-9RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-98RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-9RR 8 9 K,,,,,, NUTECH/ 9 NUTECH/ NUTECH/ NUTECH/ NUTECH/ 9,, PRAIRIE BR/ PB-9RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8R PRAIRIE BR/ PB-R PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-R 9 9 C K K,,,, NUTECH/ NUTECH/ NUTECH/ NUTECH/ NUTECH/ 8 PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-R PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8R K K K K K,,,, PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-98R PRAIRIE BR/ PB-89R PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8R 8 9 C K C C SODAK GEN/ RR/SCN STINE/ 8- STINE/ 8- STINE/ 8- A,,,, PROSEED/ - PROSEED/ 8-9 PROSEED/ 8- PROSEED/ 8-9 K, STINE/ -9 STINE/ -9 THUNDER/ 98RR THUNDER/ 9RR 8 C C K PROSEED/ 8-9 PROSEED/ 8- RENK/ RS9R RENK/ RS9R 9 C K C THUNDER/ 9RR WENSMAN/ W 9RR WENSMAN/ W 8RR WENSMAN/ W RR 9 C RENK/ RS8R RENK/ RSR RENK/ RS9RR RENK/ RS9R RENK/ RSR 8 C C K WENSMAN/ W R WENSMAN/ W RR WENSMAN/ W 9R WENSMAN/ W 9RR WENSMAN/ W R 9 9 K K K,, SEEDS / 9RR SEEDS / RR SODAK GEN/ RR SODAK GEN/ 9RR SODAK GEN/ RR 9 9 K A,,,, ZILLER/ BT ZILLER/ BT 8 ZILLER/ BT ZILLER/ EXP C K C,,

13 Table E Mailing addresses of entrants in the 8 soybean trials Entrant name (brand name), mailing address Dairyland Seed Co, Inc (Dairyland), PO Box 98, West Bend, WI 9 Gold Country Seed Inc (Gold Country Seed), Hwy N, PO Box, Hutchinson, MN G Genetics (G), Hwy 9, Forest City, IA Hefty Seed Co (Hefty), nd St, Baltic, SD JGL, Inc (JGL), Pidco Dr, Plymouth, IN Kaltenberg Seeds (Kaltenberg), State Rd 9, PO Box 8, Waunakee, WI 9-8 Kruger Seed Co (Kruger), 98 th Ave,PO Box A, Dike, IA Latham Seed Co (Latham), 8th St, Alexander, IA -88 Monsanto (Asgrow), West Carol Ave, Cortland, IL Mustang Seeds (Mustang), PO Box, Madison, SD Northstar Genetics (Northstar), th St SE, Leonard, ND 8 Nutech Seed, LLC (Nutech), Hwy 9, Forest City, IA Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl (Pioneer), St Andrews Ct, Mankato, MN Prairie Brand Seed Co (Praire Brand), X Ave, Story City, IA Proseed (Proseed), East Brewster St, Harvey, ND 8 Renk Seed Co (Renk), 89 Wilburn Rd, Sun Prairie, WI 9 Richland Organics, Inc (Richland Organics), North Tenth St, Breckenridge, MN SDSU Soybean Breeding Program (Experimentals), Plant Science Dept, Brookings, SD Seeds (Seeds ), PO Box, Breckenridge, MN Sodak Genetics (Sodak), North Campus Dr, Brookings, SD Stine Seed Co(Stine), Laredo Trail, Adel, IA Thunder Seed Inc (Thunder), 8 th St W, Hawley, MN Wensman Seed Co(Wensman), 8 th St, Watkins, MN 89 Ziller Seed CoInc(Ziller), 8th St, Bird Island, MN Table F Explanation of yield and lodging score table footnotes No Explanation of footnotes [] Days to maturity (DTM) the number of days from seeding to 9% brown pod If data is missing, the site was likely exposed to an early frost that prevented the collection of valid maturity data [] Lodging scores: = all plants erect, = % of plants lodged at -angle, = all plants flat [] Least Significant Difference (LSD ) the difference two averages within a column must equal or exceed to be significantly different from one another at the level of probability If the difference is less than the LSD value the difference between the averages is not significant (NS) [] TPG-avg the minimum value within a column that entry yield averages must equal or exceed to qualify for the TPG [] TPG-avg the maximum value within a column that lodging score averages must equal or be less than to qualify for the TPG [] Coefficient of variation (CV) - the percent of experimental error associated with a test trial Ideally, the CV value for yield is less than % Values less than % tend to be less common while values of to % are more common Occasionally, values exceed %; this means the trial contained too much experimental error to be a valid test; thus, no data for that table column is not reported

14 Table a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-o soybean variety yield and lodging averages- northern South Dakota locations, -8 Entries are sorted by -Yr then by 8 zone yield Brand/Variety DTM [] NUTECH/ NT-88RR KRUGER/ K-+RR NUTECH/ NT- KRUGER/ K-9RR NUTECH/ NT-99RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR SEEDS / 9RR MUSTANG/ M-9RR MUSTANG/ M-9RR WENSMAN/ W 9RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR DAIRYLAND/ DSR-9/RR KRUGER/ K-RR ASGROW/ AG88 PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8RR THUNDER/ 98RR HEFTY/ EXP89R KRUGER/ K-8RR KRUGER/ K-9RR JGL/ EXP JGL/ EXP PROSEED/ 8-9 G- GENETICS/ 9 SODAK GEN/ RR G- GENETICS/ 99 SODAK GEN/ 9RR PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 MUSTANG/ M-89RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 9RR Test avg : High avg : Low avg : [] Test LSD (): [] MinTPG-avg : [] MaxTPG-avg : [] Test Coef Var: No Entries: South Shore Northern Averages by Location Warner Northern Zone Averages Yield-bu/a 8 Yield-bu/a 8 Yield-bu/a 8 Lodg Lodg Lodg -Yr 8 (-) [] -Yr 8 (-) [] -Yr 8 (-) [] NS [] DTM= days to maturity from seeding dates of May at South Shore and May at Warner Note that additional table footnotes are explained in Table F * There was a significant variety by location interaction for the yield and lodging variables Therefore, evaluate these variables by using the -yr and 8 yield and 8 lodging columns for each location NS * * *

15 Table b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group- soybean variety protein and oil averages- northern South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein Northern Averages by Location Northern Zone Averages Brand/Variety DTM* South Shore Warner Protein % Oil % Protein % Oil % Protein % Oil % KRUGER/ K-9RR KRUGER/ K-8RR JGL/ EXP SEEDS / 9RR SODAK GEN/ 9RR NUTECH/ NT-99RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR KRUGER/ K-9RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR PROSEED/ 8-9 DAIRYLAND/ DSR-9/RR WENSMAN/ W 9RR MUSTANG/ M-9RR KRUGER/ K-RR SODAK GEN/ RR KRUGER/ K-+RR JGL/ EXP G- GENETICS/ 99 PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR G- GENETICS/ 9 NUTECH/ NT-88RR MUSTANG/ M-9RR NUTECH/ NT- PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8RR HEFTY/ EXP89R ASGROW/ AG88 THUNDER/ 98RR PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 MUSTANG/ M-89RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 9RR Test avg : High avg : Low avg : [] LSD() : [] MinTPG-avg : [] Coef Var : No Entries : [] DTM= days to maturity from seeding dates of May at South Shore and May at Warner Note that additional table footnotes are explained in Table F

16 Table a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety yield and lodging averages- northern South Dakota locations, -8 Entries are sorted by -Yr then by 8 zone yield Brand/Variety DTM [] HEFTY/ EXP8R WENSMAN/ W RR MUSTANG/ M-8RR STINE/ 8- HEFTY/ R PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR NUTECH/ NT-+RR WENSMAN/ W 8RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-9RR NORTHSTAR/ NS RR ASGROW/ AG NUTECH/ NT- PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-RR ASGROW/ AG ASGROW/ AG KRUGER/ K-RR SEEDS / RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-RR KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-9RR SODAK GEN/ RR/SCN KRUGER/ K-RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR SODAK GEN/ RR NUTECH/ PROSEED/ 8- THUNDER/ 9RR STINE/ 8- PIONEER/ 9Y9 KRUGER/ K-RR PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8R PROSEED/ - ASGROW/ AG8 MUSTANG/ M-9RR KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN KRUGER/ EXP KX98R PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8RR NUTECH/ NUTECH / HEFTY/ EXP9R KRUGER/ K-9RR KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN PRAIRIE BR/ PB-98RR HEFTY/ EXP9RN G- GENETICS/ NORTHSTAR/ NS RR DAIRYLAND/ DST-/RR Northern Averages by Location South Shore Warner Northern Zone Averages Yield-bu/a 8 Yield-bu/a 8 Yield-bu/a 8 Lodg Lodg Lodg -Yr 8 (-) [] -Yr 8 (-) [] -Yr 8 (-) []

17 Table a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety yield and lodging averages- northern South Dakota locations, -8 (continued) Brand/Variety DTM [] PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 WENSMAN/ W RR NORTHSTAR/ NS RR KRUGER/ K-89RR/SCN ASGROW/ AG DAIRYLAND/ DSR-/RR MUSTANG/ M-RR GOLD COUNTRY/ RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 8RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 9RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 9R DAIRYLAND/ DST-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DSRRRSTS STINE/ 8- ZILLER/ BT ZILLER/ EXP NORTHSTAR/ NS RR Test avg : High avg : Low avg : [] Test LSD (): [] MinTPG-avg : [] MaxTPG-avg : [] Test Coef Var: No Entries: Northern Averages by Location South Shore Warner Northern Zone Averages Yield-bu/a 8 Yield-bu/a 8 Yield-bu/a 8 Lodg Lodg Lodg -Yr 8 (-) [] -Yr 8 (-) [] -Yr 8 (-) [] 8 [] DTM= days to maturity from seeding dates of May at South Shore and May at Warner Note that additional table footnotes are explained in Table F * There was a significant variety by location interaction for yield and lodging in 8 Therefore, evaluate these variables by using the 8 yield and lodging columns for each location NS NS * *

18 Table b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety protein and oil averages- northern South Dakota locations, 8 Entries are sorted by 8 zone protein Northern Averages by Location Northern Zone Brand/Variety DTM* South Shore Warner Averages Protein % Oil % Protein % Oil % Protein % Oil % WENSMAN/ W 8RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-RR SEEDS / RR NUTECH/ NORTHSTAR/ NS RR PROSEED/ - MUSTANG/ M-9RR NUTECH/ NT- HEFTY/ EXP9R KRUGER/ K-9RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-RR NORTHSTAR/ NS RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8RR STINE/ 8- DAIRYLAND/ DST-/RR G- GENETICS/ THUNDER/ 9RR STINE/ 8- PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 PROSEED/ 8- PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR ASGROW/ AG KRUGER/ K-89RR/SCN PRAIRIE/ BR PB-RR WENSMAN/ W RR PIONEER/ 9Y9 KRUGER/ K-RR HEFTY/ R PRAIRIE BR/ EXP PB-8 KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN ASGROW/ AG SODAK GEN/ RR/SCN ASGROW/ AG KRUGER/ EXPKX98R HEFTY/ EXP8R KRUGER/ K-RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-98RR KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN MUSTANG/ M-8RR NORTHSTAR/ NS RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR PRAIRIE/ BR PB-9RR WENSMAN/ W RR HEFTY/ EXP9RN

19 Table b Glyphosate-resistant maturity group-i soybean variety protein and oil averages- northern South Dakota locations, 8 (continued) Northern Averages by Location Northern Zone Brand/Variety DTM* South Shore Warner Averages Protein % Oil % Protein % Oil % Protein % Oil % ASGROW/ AG8 KRUGER/ K-RR DAIRYLAND/ DSR-/RR NUTECH/ KRUGER/ K-9RR PRAIRIE BR/ PB-8R NUTECH/ KRUGER/ K-RR/SCN ASGROW/ AG NUTECH/ NT-+RR SODAK GEN/ RR MUSTANG/M-RR GOLD/ COUNTRY RR GOLD/ COUNTRY 8RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 9RR GOLD COUNTRY/ 9R DAIRYLAND/ DST-/RR DAIRYLAND/ DSRRRSTS STINE/ 8- ZILLER/ BT ZILLER/ EXP NORTHSTAR/ NS RR Test avg : High avg : Low avg : [] LSD() : [] MinTPG-avg : [] Coef Var : No Entries : [] DTM= days to maturity from seeding dates of May at South Shore and May at Warner Note that additional table footnotes are explained in Table F

20 Table a Glyphosate-resistant maturity group- soybean variety yield and lodging averages- central South Dakota locations, -8 Entries are sorted by -Yr then by 8 zone yield Brand/Variety DTM [] KRUGER/ K-+RR NUTECH/ KRUGER/ K-9RR MUSTANG/ M-9RR NUTECH/ NT-99 MUSTANG/ M-9RR KRUGER/ K-RR KRUGER/ K-8RR KRUGER/ K-9RR JGL/ EXP SODAK GEN/ RR JGL/ EXP G- GENETICS/ 99 SODAK GEN/ 9RR Test avg : High avg : Low avg : [] Test LSD (): [] MinTPG-avg : [] MaxTPG-avg : [] Test Coef Var: 9 9 Brookings Central Averages by Location Bancroft Central Zone Averages Yield-bu/a 8 Yield-bu/a 8 Yield-bu/a 8 Lodg Lodg Lodg -Yr 8 (-) [] -Yr 8 (-) [] -Yr 8 (-) [] [] DTM= days to maturity from seeding dates of May at Brookings and May 8 at Bancroft Note that additional table footnotes are explained in Table F