Insecticide Resistance in Diamondback Moth in Florida
|
|
- Gabriel Nicholson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 47 Insecticide Resistance in Diamondback Moth in Florida Gary L. Leibee and Kenneth E. Savage University of Florida, IFAS, Central Florida Research and Education Center, 2700 East Celery Avenue, Sanford, Florida , USA Abstract Topical application and leaf residue bioassays were conducted to determine the toxicity of selected insecticides to an apparently fenvalerate-resistant population of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), from central Florida. A field study was conducted to evaluate selected insecticides for the control of diamondback moth and cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hubner), in cabbage, Brassica oleracea L. (capitata group). Laboratory strains of diamondback moth established from populations from selected treatment plots of the field study were evaluated for susceptibility to fenvalerate. The laboratory studies indicated that the diamondback moth population was resistant to fenvalerate and methomyl, but susceptible to chlorpyrifos, acephate, endosulfan, and thiodicarb. The field study indicated that chlorpyrifos, endosulfan, mevinphos, and Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki were considerably more effective at suppressing diamondback moth than cypermethrin, permethrin, methomyl, and thiodicarb. Cypermethrin, permethrin, thiodicarb, and endosulfan were the most effective in controlling T. ni. Mixtures of two insecticides improved efficacy apparently due to one component controlling T. ni and not diamondback moth and the other component controlling diamondback moth and not T. ni. Examination of selected populations from the field study indicated that resistance to fenvalerate increased within one crop season with weekly use of cypermethrin and thiodicarb, but not with chlorpyrifos. Introduction The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), a worldwide pest of cruciferous crops (Talekar and Griggs 1986), was not difficult to control in Florida until about the mid 1980s. Growers began complaining of failing to control DBM in crucifers in transplant (seedling) production facilities and in the field with insecticides. Since about 1985, DBM has replaced the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), as the major target of insect control activities in cruciferous crops in Florida (G. L. Leibee, personal observation). The principal insecticides of choice in Florida were fenvalerate and permethrin which until this lime (1985), provided excellent control of the cabbage caterpillar complex, which typically consisted of DBM, T. ni, imported cabbageworm, Artogeia rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), and the cabbage webworm, Hellula rogatalis Hulst. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Fenvalerate failed to provide adequate caterpillar control in cabbage in the spring of 1985 at the Central Florida Research and Education Center (CFREC) in Sanford, Florida (Leibee 1986a). Fenvalerate controlled DBM in the spring of 1986 at the same location, indicating an apparently susceptible population was present (Leibee 1986b). From the winter of to the present, pyrethroid insecticides in general provided essentially no control of DBM at the CFREC (G. L. Leibee, unpublished data). Magaro and Edelson (1990) reported that failures to control DBM in south Texas were first reported by cabbage producers in the spring of Personal communication with entomologists during the late 1980s indicated that control of DBM 427
2 428 Leibee and Savage had become a problem in other states bordering the Gulf of Mexico and generally up the eastern seaboard of the United States. Since resistance to fenvalerate in DBM had been reported in Taiwan (Liu et al. 1982), Japan (Hama 1987), and in other areas of Southeast Asia (Cheng 1988), it was obvious that a similar problem was developing in the eastern United States. The studies reported herein were conducted to document and characterize the nature of insecticide resistance in DBM in central Florida. Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the toxicity of selected insecticides to an apparently fenvalerate-resistant population of DBM and to determine the ability of selected insecticides to increase resistance levels in the field. Field studies were conducted to evaluate selected insecticides for the control of DBM and T. ni. Materials and Methods DBM colonies: A population of DBM was allowed to build up to a moderate level in a 0.81-ha field of collards, Brassica oleracea L. (Acephala group), at the CFREC-Sanford. Prior to starting the spray program, a colony (strain A) was started from 139 pupae reared from larvae taken from the collard field from 22 April to 7 May A spray program was initiated on 13 May where fenvalerate was applied at kg AI/ha in of water on a weekly basis for 5 weeks. One day after the first application, it was observed that the DBM larvae were much more difficult to kill than the T. ni and A. rapae larvae that were also present in the collard field, indicating that the DBM population was already somewhat resistant to the fenvalerate. At the end of the 5-week spray program, it was apparent that fenvalerate was ineffective in controlling this population of DBM because the collard plants were completely skeletonized, and upon inspection several hours after spraying, there were no obvious effects of the spray on the larvae present. Another colony (strain B) was started from several hundred adults collected with a sweep net on 15 June, 5 days after the last spray application. Adults were used to start this second colony because the larvae that were present appeared diseased. These two colonies were maintained on rape, Brassica napus L., seedlings at 25 C and a 15-hour photoperiod and without exposure to insecticides until needed for the bioassays. Insecticides: Technical grade materials used in the topical application bioassays were fenvalerate (I. E. DuPont denemours & Co., Wilmington, Delaware), chlorpyrifos (Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Michigan), and methamidophos (Chevron Chemical Co., San Francisco, California). Formulated materials used in both the leaf residue bioassays and the field trials were chlorpyrifos (50% wettable powder [WP], Dow Chemical Co.), methomyl (215 g/l soluble liquid [L], I. E. dupont denemours & Co.), thiodicarb (383 g/l flowable liquid [F], Rhone-Poulenc), and endosulfan (359 g/l EC, FMC). Formulated materials used in the field trials only were cypermethrin (359 g/l EC, ICI Americas), permethrin (383 g/l EC, FMC), mevinphos (479 g/l EC, I. E. dupont denemours & Co.), Dipel 2X (Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki, 32.0 BIU/kg wettable powder [WP], Abbott), and Javelin (B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki, 16 billion Spodoptera Units/l, Sandoz). Additional formulated materials used in the leaf residue bioassays, but not in the field, were acephate (75% soluble powder (SP), Chevron Chemical Co.) and fenvalerate (287 g/l EC, I. E. dupont denemours & Co.). Bioassays: Bioassays were conducted in March and April of 1989 when strain A was in generation 29 and 30 and strain B was in generation 27 and 28. Topical application and feeding studies were utilized to conduct the bioassays. For topical application, a 0.5 µ1 droplet of acetone containing the appropriate concentration of technical insecticide was applied with an Arnold type micro-applicator (Burkard Manufacturing Co. Ltd., England) to the middle dorsum of an anesthetized early 4th instar larva (3-4 mg). Generally, each dosage was replicated three times with 10 larvae/replicate. The number of dead and moribund larvae was recorded after 24 and 48 hours. A larva was considered moribund if it could not move one body length after prodding.
3 Insecticide Resistance in Florida 429 Larvae were collected from the colonies, sorted to size, placed in the glass petri dishes lined with filter paper and covered. Larvae were provided with pieces of rape seedlings until anesthesia and dosing. All anesthesia, dosing, and maintenance of the larvae were conducted with the larvae in the petri dish. Prior to anesthesia, the larvae were dislodged from the rape seedlings with a camel-hair brush and the plant material removed to facilitate positioning of the larvae. The larvae were anesthetized with carbon dioxide for 8-10 min in a clear polystyrene plastic box with lid. The anesthetized larvae were removed from the box, dosed, and provided with three rape seedlings per petri dish. Leaf residue bioassays were conducted by placing early 4th instar larvae (3-4 mg) in glass petri dishes containing pieces of rape seedlings coated with dried residues of formulated insecticides and recording the number of dead or moribund larvae after 24 and 48 hours. The rape seedlings were dipped as whole plants for 5 sec in serial dilutions of the formulated insecticide and allowed to dry. Enough plants were dipped with each dose to provide extra for replenishing the food supply, if necessary, during the bioassay. Each petri dish contained three seedlings (generally two cotyledon leaves and one true leaf completely expanded) excised well into the dipped part of the stem. The petri dish bottoms were lined with filter paper. The range of doses for each insecticide included concentrations representing the low and high recommended field rates in water/ha and concentrations above and below these. Field study: Golden Acre Yellows Resistant cabbage was transplanted from seedbeds on 20 and 21 April 1989 into Myakka fine sand at the CFRE-Sanford, Florida. Plots consisted of four 15.2 m rows with a 0.76 m row-spacing and about a 0.28 m plant spacing. Four rows were left unplanted between each plot to provide a separation of 3.8 m. Plots were arranged in four blocks and the blocks were separated by 7.6 m alleyways. All the treatments, except for endosulfan, were assigned to the plots in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. The endosulfan treatments were an afterthought and were assigned to plots at the same end of each block originally not to be used because of high soil moisture resulting from poor drainage. Standard cultural practices for the area were used for fertilization and weed control. Sprays were applied with a tractor-mounted, compressed-air sprayer. Three hollow-cone nozzles (D2-25) were used per row; one overhead and one drop on each side. The delivery rate of spray was 467 l/ha with a boom pressure of about 3163 g/cm² (45 psi) and a speed of 3.2 km/hour. Application dates were 11, 16, 23 May and 1, 8, 16 June Insecticides and rates (expressed as kilograms of active ingredient [AI] per hectare unless stated otherwise) used in treatments consisted of chlorpyrifos at 1.12, cypermethrin at 0.067, Javelin at , methomyl at 1.01, permethrin at 0.22, thiodicarb at 0.84 and 1.12, mevinphos at 1.12, and endosulfan at Treatments consisting of a mixture of two insecticides and rates listed above were cypermethrin with chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin with Javelin, chlorpyrifos with Javelin, and thiodicarb with mevinphos. An additional treatment of chlorpyrifos mixed with Dipel 2X at 0.56 kg/ha was included. An untreated check was included. The wetting agent X-77 (Chevron Chemical Co.) was used in all treatments at the rate of 0.62 ml/l of spray. Plants were sampled on 22 and 31 May, and 7 and 14 June 1989 to determine larval numbers. Four randomly selected plants per plot (two from the middle of each center row) were sampled by carefully cutting the stem below the portion of the plant containing the bud or head and the next four youngest leaves (wrapper leaves in the head stage). The stem was cut below all the foliage if only four leaves were present. The four plants were placed in a plastic bag and transported back to the processing area. Each sample of four plants was placed into a Berlese funnel and subjected to heat for 24 hours. When heads were present, the infested head leaves were pulled away from the head and the uninfested portion of the head was cut out to reduce the amount of plant material that went into the funnel. Larvae were collected into 70% ethyl alcohol. All species except DBM were categorized according to size (small, medium, and large). DBM was categorized according to instar by head capsule size. Ten mature plants were rated for damage on 16 June 1989 using a scale of 1-6 similar to that of Greene et al. (1969). Percent marketability for normal market conditions (no head damage) was based on the proportion of
4 430 Leibee and Savage plants having a damage rating of 3.0 or less. Percent marketability for exceptional market conditions (slight amount of head damage) was based on the proportion of plants having a damage rating of 4.0 or less. Damage ratings were taken from only one plot of the endosulfan treatments due to severe stunting in the other three replicates resulting from excessive soil moisture. Insecticide resistance development study: Colonies of DBM were established from the untreated check, chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, and thiodicarb plots of the field trial. Larvae and pupae were collected from each replicate of a treatment and combined to provide at least 100 individuals to start each colony. Collections were made from the untreated check plots on 22 June, the cypermethrin plots on 23 June, and the chlorpyrifos and thiodicarb plots on 26 June The colonies were maintained on rape seedlings into the F2 generation until there were enough individuals to determine the toxicity of fenvalerate to each colony using the leaf residue procedure described above. Statistical analysis: Concentration-mortality response data were subjected to probit analysis (Finney 197 1) where applicable. All concentration-mortality response data were corrected for control mortality (Abbot 1925) unless indicated otherwise. Data from the field trial were subjected to analysis of variance and means were separated by Duncan s (1955) Multiple Range Test (P = 0.05 level). Damage ratings were not transformed. Percentage data were transformed using arcsine. Larval count data were transformed using log (X + 1.5) for DBM and square root (X + 1.5) for T. ni. Actual means are presented in tables. Results and Discussion Bioassays: There was a significant difference in toxicity of fenvalerate to DBM strains A and B using topical application based on nonoverlap of the 95 % fiducial limits (Table 1). The LD50 values of 0.96 and µg/larva for strains A and B, respectively, indicated that strain B was about 38 times more resistant to fenvalerate than strain A and that both strains were comparable to the super-resistant strains described by Hama (1987). A very stable kind of resistance is indicated in that strains A and B have retained this high level of fenvalerate resistance after 29 and 27 generations, respectively, without selection. Highly stable fenvalerate resistance in DBM has been indicated in Japan (Hama 1988) and Taiwan (Chen and Sun 1986). There were no significant differences in the toxicity of chlorpyrifos and methamidophos to strains A and B based on overlap of the 95% fiducial limits (Table 1). But, the LD50 values indicated that chlorpyrifos was about 2.7 times more toxic to strain A as it was to strain B. All the leaf residue concentration-response data were subjected to probit analysis, but only the data for fenvalerate, acephate, and thiodicarb fit the probit model well enough to present the LD50 and slope values (Table 2). There were no significant differences in the toxicity of fenvalerate, acephate, and thiodicarb to strains A and B using the leaf residue bioassay based on overlap of the 95% fiducial limits. But, the LD50 values indicated that fenvalerate was about twice as toxic to strain A than to strain B. Even though the leaf residue concentration-mortality response data for methomyl, chlorpyrifos, and endosulfan did not fit the probit model, the data for concentrations representing 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 times the maximum recommended field rate were considered valuable when presented with similar data for fenvalerate, acephate, and thiodicarb (Table 3). Results indicated very little difference between strains A and B in response to the insecticides. Data suggest that thiodicarb, acephate, chlorpyrifos, and endosulfan at the maximum recommended field rate would be effective in controlling this resistant strain of DBM where fenvalerate and methomyl would not. The great differences in the relative toxicity of fenvalerate to strains A and B indicated by the two different bioassay methods might be due to differences in the routes of entry of the toxicant inherent in the two bioassay methods. Topical application relies on contact toxicity only where leaf residue relies on ingestion of the toxicant and probably some toxicity from contact
5 Insecticide Resistance in Florida 43 1 Table I. Toxicity of fenvalerate (48 hours), chlorpyrifos (24 hours), and methamidophos (24 hours) to two strains (A and B) of DBM using topical application. Insecticide and strain n Slope ± SE LD50 (ppm) 95% FL (generation) Fenvalerate A (F29) I I B (F27) I Chlorpyrifos A (F30) I B (F28) I I Methamidophos A (F30) I B (F28) I I ª fiducial limits. - Table 2. Toxicity of fenvalerate (48 hours), acephate (24 hours), and thiodicarb (48 hours) to two strains (A and B) of DBM using a leaf residue bioassay. Insecticide and strain n Slope ± SE LD50 (g AI/I) 95% FL (generation) Fenvalerate A (F29) I I B (F27) I I 0.36 Acephate A (F31) B (F29) Thiodicarb A (F3I) I B (F29) I I. I Table 3. Concentration-mortality (48 hours) response of two strains of DBM exposed to leaf residues of fenvalerate, methomyl, thiodicarb, acephate, chlorpyrifos, and endosulfan representing 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 times the recommended field rates. Insecticide Mortality (%) (SE) Strain 0.5X I.0xª 2.0x Fenvalerate A 1 1 (8) 26 (12) 54 (9) B 27 (8) 36 (22) 66 (I 8) Methomyl A 65 (7) 72 (8) 77 (12) B 52 (10) 53 (12) 93 (7) Thiodicarb A 41 (9) 90 (10) 76 (9) B 71 (7) 93 (3) 82 (10) Acephate A 92 (4) 96 (4) 100 (0) B 100 (0) 87 (8) 100 (0) Chlorpyrifos A 72 (16) 82 (12) 78 (7) B 65 (0) 88 (7) 84 (10) Endosulfan A 86 (4) 100 (0) 89 (6) B 82 (4) 93 (4) 96 (4) ª1.OX for fenvalerate. methomyl, thiodicarb, acephate. chlorpyrifos, and endosulfan is 0.48, 2.16, I.92, 2.40, 2.40 and 2.40 g AI/l, respectively.
6 432 Leibee and Savage with the leaf residue. The difference in toxicity to fenvalerate between strains A and B with topical application could indicate slower cuticular penetration in strain B. Noppun et al. (1989) showed reduced cuticular penetration of fenvalerate in resistant strains of DBM. Ingestion of fenvalerate with the leaf material might remove differences in cuticular penetration as a factor in toxicity. Also, the similarity between strains A and B indicated by the leaf residue bioassay might be due to loss of resistance in strain B over time due to lack of selection with fenvalerate to maintain the original levels of resistance. Field study: DBM and T. ni were the predominant species present throughout the experiment. Numbers of DBM were different (P < 0.05) among treatments on the last three sample dates (Table 4). There were few differences (P <0.05) in the numbers of T. ni among treatments on the first sample date and no differences (P > 0.05) on the last three sample dates. Numbers of T. ni appeared to be very low on each sample date, but a considerable amount of damage in several treatments was characteristic of that produced by T. ni. Since T. ni larvae can consume 18.4 times more cabbage than DBM larvae (East et al. 1989), the numbers of T. ni present over the entire sampling period were considered high enough in several treatments to cause significant damage. When the numbers of T. ni were combined over all sample dates, there were more and greater differences (P < 0.05) among treatments (Table 4) which corresponded well with amounts of damage present (Table 5). In the treatments consisting of a single insecticide, chlorpyrifos, mevinphos, endosulfan, and Javelin were considerably more effective at reducing numbers of DBM than cypermethrin, permethrin, methomyl, and thiodicarb, suggesting a higher level of resistance to pyrethroids and carbamates than to organophosphates, endosulfan, and B. thuringiensis (Table 4). Except for thiodicarb, the effects of chlorpyrifos, endosulfan, and methomyl on the numbers of DBM in the field study were in agreement with the results of the leaf residue study (Table 3). Cypermethrin, permethrin, thiodicarb, and endosulfan were most effective at reducing numbers of T. ni. Endosulfan was the only insecticide that was effective against both species and produced the most marketable cabbage in the experiment among the treatments consisting of a single insecticide (Table 5). The remaining single insecticide treatments provided essentially no marketable cabbage under normal market conditions. The insecticide mixtures resulted in a significant (P <0.05) decrease in damage when compared to the damage in the untreated check and that of components of the mixtures, except for cypermethrin + Javelin. Based on the frequency of damage ratings of 3.0 or less, a significant (P <0.05) increase in marketability over the untreated check was indicated in the treatments consisting of the following mixtures listed in order of decreasing marketability: cypermethrin + chlorpyrifos, thiodicarb + mevinphos, and chlorpyrifos + Dipel 2X. Cypermethrin + chlorpyrifos was significantly (P <0.05) better than all other mixtures. Based on the frequency of damage ratings of 4.0 or less, which represents a relatively high level of insect control, all mixtures resulted in a significant increase in marketability over the untreated check with the increases becoming quite high in all but the cypermethrin + Javelin. In general, based on larval numbers, the increase in efficacy from the mixtures appears to be due to one component controlling DBM and not T. ni and the other component controlling T. ni, but not DBM. The cypermethrin-chlorpyrifos mixture resulted in the greatest reduction in damage probably because the cypermethrin alone provided the best T. ni control and the chlorpyrifos alone provided the best DBM control. Insecticide resistance development study: The toxicity of fenvalerate to DBM strains established from the untreated check, chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, and thiodicarb plots indicated an increase in resistance to fenvalerate had developed in the cypermethrin and thiodicarb plots relative to the untreated check and chlorpyrifos plots (Table 6). This increase in resistance to fenvalerate occurred over the 5-week spray period during which no more than three generations of DBM could have occurred based on the shortest development time of days from egg
7 Insecticide Resistance in Florida 433 Table 4. Effects of selected insecticidal treatments on larval numbers for DBM and T. ni on cabbage. Insecticide and rate (kg AI or I formulation / ha) No. 2nd-4th instar DBM larvae/4 plantsa 31 May 7 June 14 June Total no. T. ni larvae/4 plantsª for all sample dates Untreated check 7.3 ab 5.0 cde I I.0 bcd 6.3 ab Chlorpyrifos I. I2 0.8 fgh 2.3 e-h 3.3 def 6.0 ab Cypermethrin a 10.0 a 31.8 a 0.8 de Javelin 1.17 I 3.5 bcd 3.7 c-f 5.5 cde 4.5 a-d Cypermethrin Chlorpyrifos I. I2 0.3 gh 1.7 e-h 2.8 ef 1.8 b-e Cypermethrin Javelin 1.17 I 1.3 e-h 6.7 bcd 14.3 abc 1.8 cde Chlorpyrifos Dipel 2X 0.56 Chlorpyrifos I I.8 d-g I.7 e-h 3.5 def 5.5 abc Javelin I 0.8 fgh 1.0 fgh 2.0 ef 4.8 a-d Methomyl ab 2.3 d-g 17.5 abc 3.8 a-e Permethrin ab 9.3 abc 24.8 ab 0.5 e Thiodicarb I. I2 2.8 def 13.0 ab 21.8 ab 0.5 e Thiodicarb abc 7.7 abc 33.0 a 2.0 b-e Thiodicarb Mevinphos I. I2 1.0 fgh 1.3 fgh 8.5 b-e 1.5 cde Mevinphos I. I2 3.0 cde 1.0 fgh 6.3 def 6.3 a Endosulfan I. I2 0.8 fgh 1.0 fgh 3.5 def 2.8 a-e ªMeans in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05; Duncan's 1955 Multiple Range Test). Table 5. Effects of selected insecticidal treatments for the control of DBM and T. ni on damage ratings (DR) and two levels of marketability in cabbage. Insecticide and rate (kg AI or I formulation / ha) Untreated check Chlorpyrifos 1. I2 Cypermethrin Javelin I. I7 I Cypermethrin Chlorpyrifos I. I2 Cypermethrin Javelin I. 17 I Chlorpyrifos I. I2 + Dipel 2X 0.56 Chlorpyrifos Javelin I. 17 I Methomyl 1.01 Permethrin 0.22 Thiodicarb I. I2 Thiodicarb 0.84 Thiodicarb Mevinphos I. I2 Mevinphos 1. I2 Endosulfan I. I2 Damage ratinga (DR I 3) % marketablea 6.0 a 0.0 f 0.0 d 5.2 cd 2.5 ef 10.0 cd 6.0 a 0.0 f 0.0 d 5.1 d 0.0 f 20.0 bc 3.5 ef 40.0 d 95.0 a 4.9 d 0.0 f 40.0 b 4.0 e 17.5 e 82.5 a 3.9 e 12.5 ef 95.0 a 5.9 ab 0.0 f 0.0 d 6.0 a 0.0 f 0.0 d 5.7 abc 0.0 f 0.0 d 5.7 abc 0.0 f 0.0 d 3.7 ef 22.5 e 87.5 a 5.4 bcd 0.0 f 5.0 cd ªMeans in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05; Duncan's [ I955] multiple range test). -' indicates unreplicated. See text.
8 434 Leibee and Savage to adult reported for DBM by Sarnthoy et al. (1989). This is in agreement with Chen and Sun (1986) who found that resistance to fenvalerate in DBM could be increased to an extremely high level within four generations in the laboratory with intensive selection with fenvalerate. These results suggest that cypermethrin and thiodicarb were more effective than chlorpyrifos at selecting for resistance to fenvalerate. Table 6. Mortality (24 hours) of four strains of DBM exposed to fenvalerate leaf residues. The strains were established from mature cabbage field plots that were untreated (UTC) and treated with chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, and thiodicarb. Mortality (%) (SE)b Rate of UTC Chlorpyrifos Cypermethrin Thiodicarb fenvalerateª strain strain strain strain 0.0x 10.0 (3.3) 2.7 (I.7) 7.6 (I.6) 6.7 (6.7) 0.5X 17.1 (5.4) 13.3 (3.8) 1.7 (1.7) 0.0 (0.0) I.ox 33.5 (5.6) 20.8 (7. I) 12.1 (2.0) 8.1 (1.8) 2.0x 36.4 (2.0) 21.8 (2.2) 12.1 (2.0) 9.5 (2.4) 4.0X 36.4 (8.4) 32.9 (3.8) 16.9 (4.3) 20.7 (4.0) 8.0X 42.2 (1.1) 34.5 (I.2) 25.7 (3. I) 30.9 (7.9) ª1,OX = 0.48 g AI/l. Not corrected for control mortality Conclusions: A DBM population in central Florida was found to be highly resistant to fenvalerate. Laboratory studies indicated that the population was also resistant to methomyl, but susceptible to chlorpyrifos, acephate, endosulfan, and thiodicarb. The field study indicated that chlorpyrifos, endosulfan, mevinphos, and B. thuringiensis were considerably more effective at suppressing DBM than cypermethrin, permethrin, methomyl, and thiodicarb. Cypermethrin, permethrin, thiodicarb, and endosulfan were the most effective in controlling T. ni. Mixtures of two insecticides were shown to improve efficacy apparently due to one component controlling T. ni and not DBM and the other component controlling DBM and not T. ni. Laboratory examination of populations from the field study indicated that resistance to fenvalerate in DBM increased within one crop season with weekly use of cypermethrin and thiodicarb, but not with chlorpyrifos. References Abbot, W. S A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol., 18, Chen, J. S. and Sun, C. N Resistance of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to a combination of fenvalerate and piperonyl butoxide. J. Econ. Entomol., 79, Cheng, E. Y Problems of control of insecticide-resistant Plutella xylostella. Pestic. Sci., 23, Duncan, D. B Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11, East, D. A., Edelson, J. V., and Cartwright, B Relative cabbage consumption by the cabbage looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 82, Finney, D. J Probit analysis, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 333 p. Greene, G. L., Genung, W. G., Workman, R. B., and Kelsheimer, E. G Cabbagelooper control in Florida-a cooperative program. J. Econ. Entomol., 62, Hama, Y Development of pyrethroid resistance in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella Linné (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool., 22, Stability of fenvalerate resistance in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella Linné (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 32,
9 Insecticide Resistance in Florida 435 Leibee, G. L. 1986a. Caterpillar control on cabbage, spring CFREC-Sanford Research Report SAN University of Florida, IFAS. 2 p b. Caterpillar control on cabbage, spring CFREC-Sanford Research Report SAN University of Florida, IFAS. 3 p. Liu, M. Y., Tzeng, Y. J., and Sun, C. N Diamondback moth resistance to several synthetic pyrethroids. J. Econ. Entomol., 74, Magaro, J. J., and Edelson, J. V Diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in south Texas: a technique for resistance monitoring in the field. J. Econ. Entomol., 83, Noppun, V., Saito, T., and Miyata, T Cuticular penetration of S-fenvalerate in fenvalerateresistant and susceptible strains of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 33, Sarnthoy, O., Keinmeesuke, P., Sinchaisri, N., and Nakasuji, F Development and reproductive rate of diamondback moth Plutella xylostella from Thailand. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 24, Talekar, N. S., and Griggs, T. D. (ed.) Diamondback moth management: Proceedings of the first international workshop. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, 471 p.
Use of Benfuracarb in the Integrated Management of Diamondback Moth
37 Use of Benfuracarb in the Integrated Management of Diamondback Moth Norio Yasudomi, Tetsuji Miyata, Keizaburo Murai and Noriharu Umetsu Otsuka Chemical Co., Ltd., Naruto Research Center, Naruto, Tokushima,
More informationP. J. Cameron a, A. M. Shelton b, G. P. Walker a & J. D. Tang b a New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Limited, Private
This article was downloaded by: [Cornell University] On: 26 June 2012, At: 10:51 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer
More informationSeasonality of major cabbage pests and incidence of their natural enemies in Central Kenya
Seasonality of major cabbage pests and incidence of their natural enemies in Central Kenya G. I. Oduor, B. Lohr and A. A. Seif National Agricultural Research Centre Muguga, KARI, P.O. 348, Nairobi, Kenya
More informationStriped Cucumber Beetle Management with Plant and Microbial Metabolites Shelby Fleischer 1, Tim Elkner 2, and Maggie Lewis 1
Striped Cucumber Beetle Management with Plant and Microbial Metabolites Shelby Fleischer, Tim Elkner, and Maggie Lewis Penn State University, University Park Southeast Agricultural Research and Extension
More informationALFALFA INSECT CONTROL
ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL David Buntin, Research/Extension Entomologist At-Planting seed Cutworms, grubs, wireworms Lorsban 15G 6.7 lb. Apply in-furrow at planting for suppression of target pests. Do not
More informationThe diamondback moth: a problem pest of brassica crops in Kenya
The diamondback moth: a problem pest of brassica crops in Kenya G. N. Kibata Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, P O Box, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract Cruciferous crops are important vegetables in Kenya
More informationPotential of Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus (NPV) and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) for Spodoptera Control in Yellow Granex Onion
Potential of Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus (NPV) and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) for Spodoptera Control in Yellow Granex Onion [Microbial Control of Spodoptera in Onion] Investigators: L.E. Padua ', A.C.
More informationInsects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for Rick Foster Purdue University
Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for 2012 Rick Foster Purdue University CABBAGE CATERPILLARS n c t s ai Diamondback Moth Most serious pest worldwide $1 billion annually Resistant
More informationALFALFA: ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL
ALFALFA: ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL David Buntin, Research/Extension Entomologist At-Planting Pests Cutworms, grubs, wireworms Lorsban 15G 6.6 lb 1.0 24 hours/ 21 days Apply in-furrow at planting for suppression
More informationFoliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2015)
Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2015) Bruce Potter, University of Minnesota Extension IPM Specialist Travis Vollmer, Plot Technician University of Minnesota Department of Entomology,
More informationFoliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2011) Summary Background
Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2011) Bruce Potter, University of Minnesota Extension IPM Specialist University of Minnesota Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota Southwest
More informationDiPel Biological Insecticide
DiPel Biological Insecticide Horticulture Crops Technical Manual Innovative solutions. Business made easy. Aim: Getting safe, reliable, cost-effective control of Lepidoptera pests in a full spectrum of
More informationMAPP The (COSHH) Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations may apply to the use of this product at work. SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
I d RUMO MAPP 14883 A water dispersible granule containing 300 g/kg indoxacarb for the control of pollen beetle in oilseed rape and caterpillars in cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli and various protected
More informationBiology, Ecology and Management of Onion Thrips in Onion
Biology, Ecology and Management of Onion Thrips in Onion Updated March 2007 Brian A. Nault Department of Entomology Cornell University NYSAES Geneva, NY Onion Production in New York Dry bulb onions, Allium
More informationEfficacy and Degradation of Field Applied Insecticide Residues to Economically Control Spotted Wing Drosophila in Mature Highbush Blueberry, 2012
Efficacy and Degradation of Field Applied Insecticide Residues to Economically Control Spotted Wing Drosophila in Mature Highbush Blueberry, 2012 Lynell K. Tanigoshi, B. S. Gerdeman, Wei Yang 1 & G. H.
More informationField evaluation of wetting agent efficacy against localized dry spot and hydrophobicity in creeping bentgrass putting green turf -AquaAid
Field evaluation of wetting agent efficacy against localized dry spot and hydrophobicity in creeping bentgrass putting green turf -AquaAid K. Carey, A.J. Porter, E.M. Lyons and K.S. Jordan Department of
More informationReduction of Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Infestation in Head Cabbage by Overhead Irrigation
HORTICULTURALENTOMOLOGY Reduction of Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Infestation in Head Cabbage by Overhead Irrigation JOHN J. McHUGH, JR.,) AND RICK E. FOSTER Department of Entomology, Purdue
More informationIntroduction. Materials and Methods
Page 1 of 5 THE RESPONSE OF 3 NATIVE HAWAIIAN GRASSES TO 2 SEQUENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF SELECTIVE POSTEMERGENCE GRASS HERBICIDES. By Joe DeFrank, UH-Manoa Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science Dated
More informationEFFECT OF SPRAY VOLUME AND SPRAYER TYPE ON EFFICACY OF INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROL OF ASIAN CITRUS PSYLLID AND CITRUS
1 (D) ORANGE: Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck, Valencia EFFECT OF SPRAY VOLUME AND SPRAYER TYPE ON EFFICACY OF INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROL OF ASIAN CITRUS PSYLLID AND CITRUS LEAFMINER ON ORANGES: 2010 Philip
More informationTYLCV-resistant Tomato Cultivar Trial and Whitefly Control Strategies
TYLCV-resistant Tomato Cultivar Trial and Whitefly Control Strategies Kent Cushman Vegetable Specialist and Assistant Professor UF/IFAS, Southwest Florida Research & Education Center, Immokalee kcushman@ufl.edu
More informationFoliar applied insecticides, application rates, and application timings for the control of the Soybean Aphid insecticide (2016)
Foliar applied insecticides, application rates, and application timings for the control of the Soybean Aphid insecticide (2016) Bruce Potter, University of Minnesota Extension IPM Specialist Travis Vollmer,
More informationSEED TREATMENTS FOR WIREWORM CONTROL IN FIELD CORN. Michelle Leinfelder-Miles 1 INTRODUCTION
SEED TREATMENTS FOR WIREWORM CONTROL IN FIELD CORN Michelle Leinfelder-Miles 1 ABSTRACT Wireworms are the soil-dwelling larvae of click beetles. Wireworms feed on the seed and roots of various crops and
More informationRice Insecticide Seed Treatments:
DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION University of Arkansas System Agriculture and Natural Resources FSA7085 Rice Insecticide Seed Treatments: Is There Value to the Arkansas Rice Producer? Gus
More informationInsecticide Resistance Action Committee. Prevention and Management of Insecticide Resistance in Vectors of Public Health Importance
Insecticide Resistance Action Committee Prevention and Management of Insecticide Resistance in Vectors of Public Health Importance Insecticide Resistance Action Committee - Organisation - 2 Insecticide
More informationINCIDENCE, DAMAGE POTENTIAL AND MANAGEMENT OF JASSIDS IN GROUNDNUT FIELD DR. G. C. BISWAS 1
ISSN 0258-7122 Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 40(3): 507-512, September 2015 Short Communication INCIDENCE, DAMAGE POTENTIAL AND MANAGEMENT OF JASSIDS IN GROUNDNUT FIELD DR. G. C. BISWAS 1 Keywords : Incidence,
More informationEvaluation of Experimental Nematicides for the Management of the Reniform Nematode in North Alabama, 2013
V. Nematode Management Evaluation of Experimental Nematicides for the Management of the Reniform Nematode in North Alabama, 2013 C. J. Land, K.S. Lawrence, C.H. Burmester, and C..Norris Eight different
More informationKansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter
Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter For Agribusinesses, Applicators, Consultants, Extension Personnel & Homeowners Department of Entomology 123 West Waters Hall K-State Research
More informationEffect of Monocrotophos on the Leaf Eating Caterpillar, Opisina arenosella Walk, when Injected into the Trunk of the Coconut Palm.
COCOS, (1985) 3,09-15 Printed in Sri Lanka. Effect of Monocrotophos on the Leaf Eating Caterpillar, Opisina arenosella Walk, when Injected into the Trunk of the Coconut Palm. P. KANAGARATNAM and J. L.
More informationPesticide Product/acre REI PHI Comments Beta cyfluthrin R. 7 d grazing and hay harvest. 12 hr
PASTURE AND HAY INSECT MANAGEMENT Jay Crouch, Area Agronomy Agent, Brian Beer, Area Livestock Agent, and Robert Bellinger, Ph.D., Extension Entomologist Insect pests of pastures, hay fields and some forage
More informationEvaluation of Newer Insecticides aganist Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.) Infesting Rice
Research Article Evaluation of Newer Insecticides aganist Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.) Infesting Rice Deekshita Konchada* 1, Rama Rao V Chennamasetty 2 and Sandhya Rani Choragudi 1 1 Department
More informationEFFICACY EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDE PROSARO AGAINST SCLEROTINIA DISEASE IN TURNIP RAPE
2011 Herbicides, fungicides and insecticides EFFICACY EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDE PROSARO AGAINST SCLEROTINIA DISEASE IN TURNIP RAPE Study director: Ulla Heinonen Trial ID Variety Location Experimental starting
More informationR. Allen Straw, SW VA AREC, VPI Farm Rd., Glade Spring, VA 24340,
Title: Herbicide Weed Control in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries Report Type: Progress Grant Code: SFSFC Project # 2014-12 Name, Mailing and Email Address of Principal Investigator(s): R. Allen Straw,
More informationThe Control of the Nun Moth (Lymantria monacha L.) in Poland: A Comparison of Two Strategies
The Control of the Nun Moth (Lymantria monacha L.) in Poland: A Comparison of Two Strategies BARBARA GLOWACKA Forest Research Institute, Bitwy Warszawskiej 3, -973 Warsaw, Poland ABSTRACT The nun moth
More informationHeritability and stability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
Bulletin of Entomological Research (1999) 89, 449 454 449 Heritability and stability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) F. Huang 1, R.A. Higgins 1 *,
More informationCONTENTS. Information contained herein is available to all persons without regard to race, color, sex, or national origin. Page
1 'N t It 9 4 Id CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION...... 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS...... 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION...... 5 SUMMARY...... 7 LITERATURE CITED...... 8 FIRST PRINTING, 3.5M, DECEMBER 1985 Information
More informationSprayer Design for Chemical Conditioning of Alfalfa
Sprayer Design for Chemical Conditioning of Alfalfa C. A. Rotz, R. J. Davis MEMBER ASAE MECHANIZATION MEMBER ASAE ABSTRACT FIELD drying tests were conducted to determine major design criteria for spray
More informationPlanting Date vs. Rice Water Weevil Beaumont, TX 2006
Beaumont, TX 2006 Introduction This experiment is a continuation of a multi-year study to investigate the relationship between rice planting date and rice water weevil (RWW) activity. Determining yield
More informationResidues on food items for birds and mammal. Robert Luttik, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, NL
Residues on food items for birds and mammal Robert Luttik, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, NL Valencia workshop 2007 1 History: Nomograms of Kenaga The EPA food-chain (Kenaga)
More information2007 PMR REPORT #ECORSMI2 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS - Insects
2007 PMR REPORT #ECORSMI2 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS - Insects CROP: PEST: Corn, Zea mays (L.), Maizex cvs. MZ55 and MZ-0RR Western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (LeConte)
More informationEvaluation of Tomato Varieties with TSWV Resistance. Craig H. Canaday and Jim E. Wyatt. Interpretative Summary. Introduction
Evaluation of Tomato Varieties with TSWV Resistance Craig H. Canaday and Jim E. Wyatt Interpretative Summary Tomato varieties BHN 444 and BHN 555 with reported resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus (SWV)
More informationInsecticides for Empty Grain Bins
Insecticides for Empty Grain Bins Research trials examine efficacy of two insecticides to control insects. In this column, Blossom Sehgal, a graduate research assistant in the Department of Grain Science
More informationInnovative Natural Products for Agricultural Pest and Water Resource Management
Innovative Natural Products for Agricultural Pest and Water Resource Management Ground Breaking Ceremony at Bangor, Michigan New Manufacturing Facility August 2012 Broad Spectrum Bioinsecticide Grandevo
More informationEVALUATION OF SEVERAL REDUCED-RISK INSECTICIDES IN COMBINATION WITH AN ACTION THRESHOLD FOR MANAGING LEPIDOPTERAN PESTS OF COLE CROPS IN ALABAMA
Maxwell & Fadamiro: Management of Cole Crop Pests with Novel Insecticides 117 EVALUATION OF SEVERAL REDUCED-RISK INSECTICIDES IN COMBINATION WITH AN ACTION THRESHOLD FOR MANAGING LEPIDOPTERAN PESTS OF
More informationField efficacy and economics of some new insecticide molecules against lepidopteran caterpillars in chickpea
Field efficacy and economics of some new insecticide molecules against lepidopteran caterpillars in chickpea G. V. Suneel Kumar* and O. Sarada** *Agricultural Research Station, Darsi - 523 247, Prakasam
More informationINSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS Prepared by Douglas Johnson, Extension Entomologist
INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS- 2004 Prepared by Douglas Johnson, Extension Entomologist ENT-13 Kentucky now ranks among the major soybean producing states. More insect problems have been associated
More informationChemical and Cultural Controls for Moss, Bryum argenteum on Putting Greens
Chemical and Cultural Controls for Moss, Bryum argenteum on Putting Greens Principal Investigators: Wendy Gelernter, Ph.D. and Larry J. Stowell, Ph.D., CPPP, CPAg Cooperator: David Michael, Friendly Hills
More informationDoes the dynamic of insecticide resistance affect the results of susceptibility tests?
ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 3 Number 10 (2014) pp. 885-892 http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article Does the dynamic of insecticide resistance affect the results of susceptibility tests? Nazaire Aïzoun
More informationData submitted by leading universities demonstrate that air-assisted. Significantly increase insect and disease control.
What Growers Should Know About AirAssisted Electrostatic Spraying Data submitted by leading universities demonstrate that airassisted electrostatic sprayers: Significantly increase insect and disease control.
More informationSite and application information. 1 of 10 8/5/2010 8:46 AM. Trial: SBAseedearl, SBAseedlate
1 of 10 8/5/2010 8:46 AM myu One Stop Directories Search U of M Print this page using Acrobat Reader Trial: 2002-1SBAseedearl, 2002-1SBAseedlate Seed applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (Aphis
More informationInsect Management Techniques for Organic Rice Production. Mo Way, Becky Pearson, Carra Curtice and Suhas Vyavhare
Insect Management Techniques for Organic Rice Production Mo Way, Becky Pearson, Carra Curtice and Suhas Vyavhare Introduction About 50,000 acres (20,000 ha) of organic rice in the US---increasing yearly
More informationWeed Control in No-Till Pumpkins
Weed Control in No-Till Pumpkins Elizabeth T. Maynard, Purdue University, Westville, Indiana 46391 Introduction No-till production systems for pumpkins are of interest to Midwest producers, but achieving
More informationComparative effect of integrated pest management and farmers' standard pest controlpractice for managing insect pests on cabbage (Brassica spp.
Comparative effect of integrated pest management and farmers' standard pest controlpractice for managing insect pests on cabbage (Brassica spp.) Author: Gadi V.P. Reddy This is the peer reviewed version
More informationCOTTON PRODUCT USE GUIDE
COTTON PRODUCT USE GUIDE U.S. Edition WideStrike Insect Protection WideStrike 3 Insect Protection This Product Use Guide sets forth the requirements for growing cotton containing WideStrike Insect Protection
More informationBio-efficacy of some new insecticide molecules against pod borer complex of Red gram
Legume Research, 38 (2) 2015 : 253-259 Print ISSN:0250-5371 / Online ISSN:0976-0571 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION CENTRE www.arccjournals.com/www.legumeresearch.in Bio-efficacy of some new insecticide
More informationSOYBEAN INSECTICIDE PERFORMANCE RATING, 2017
SOYBEAN INSECTICIDE PERFORMANCE RATING, 2017 Stem Feeders Defoliators Defoliators and Pod Feeders Pod Feeders Rating Scale: 0 = no control 10 = excellent Chemistry Restricted Entry Interval (hours) Restricted
More informationBiological Control of Myllocerus subasciatus Guerin Infesting Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) Using Bacillus thuringiensis ssp.
Biological Control of Myllocerus subasciatus Guerin Infesting Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) Using Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. tenebrionis Sukhada Mohandas Y. Saravanan and K. Manjunath Department of Biotechnology
More informationProcedures for Tomato Variety Field Trials
AVRDC The World Vegetable Center AVRDC Publication Number: 11-751 International Cooperators Guide Procedures for Tomato Variety Field Trials Peter Hanson, Li-ju Lin, Gregory C. Luther, Wen-shi Tsai, R.
More informationEffects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato
Effects of Different Fertilizers and Continuous No-Till Production on Diseases, Growth, and Yield of Staked Tomato Craig H. Canaday, Jim E. Wyatt, and Don D. Tyler Interpretative Summary The effects of
More informationOrnamental. Product Catalog
Ornamental Product Catalog Aquatrols surfactants and specialty products have helped growers manage water, save money and grow quality plants for more than 50 years. Media Surfactants/Wetting Agents Our
More informationField Application of Entomopathogenic Nematodes for Control of Delia radicum in Collards 1
Journal of Nematology 24(3):374-378. 1992. The Society of Nematologists 1992. Field Application of Entomopathogenic Nematodes for Control of Delia radicum in Collards 1 DAVr SIMSER 2 Abstract: Control
More informationIntegrated Pest Management
Integrated Pest Management System or strategy Utilizes all methods of pest suppression Compatible Maintain pests below economically damaging level Environmentally sound Economically sound Biological Control
More informationSMALL GRAIN INSECT CONTROL David Gunter, Extension Feed Grain Specialist
SMALL GRAIN INSECT CONTROL David Gunter, Extension Feed Grain Specialist aphids Seed Treatments Enhance AW Gaucho 600, Axcess, Attendant 600 Gaucho XT Cruiser 5FS NipsIt Inside 4.0 / 100 lb 0.8 fl / Foliar
More informationManaging aphids in flowering canola in central west NSW
Managing aphids in flowering canola in central west NSW Leigh Jenkins 1, Rohan Brill 2 and Don McCaffery 3 1 NSW Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 183, Warren NSW 2824, Australia. 2 NSW Department
More informationEVALUATION OF ATTRIBUT SUPER AT LOWER DOSES IN WHEAT IN 2011
Trial Report 2011 Herbicides, fungicides and insecticides EVALUATION OF ATTRIBUT SUPER AT LOWER DOSES IN WHEAT IN 2011 Study Director: Sanni Junnila Trial ID Location Crop Experimental starting and completion
More informationGrowth and Yield of Organic Rice as Affected by Rice Straw and Organic Fertilizer
Research article erd Growth and Yield of Organic Rice as Affected by Rice Straw and Organic Fertilizer ANAN POLTHANEE Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand E-mail:panan@kku.ac.th
More informationEfficacy of certain new insecticide molecules against groundnut defoliator, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Noctuidae : Lepidoptera)
Efficacy of certain new insecticide molecules against groundnut defoliator, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Noctuidae : Lepidoptera) T. Murali Krishna*, K. Devaki, K. Raja Reddy and U. Venkateswarlu Regional
More informationObjective: How it Was Done:
Evaluation of Various Aquatrols Wetting Agents for Suppression of Localized Dry Spot and Hydrophobicity on a Sand-based Rootzone, 2003 Cale Bigelow, Glenn Hardebeck, J.D. Cash, and Kristie Walker Objective:
More informationIntegrated Management of Sweet Corn Insects in New Hampshire
Bringing information and education into the communities of the Granite State Integrated Management of Sweet Corn Insects in New Hampshire Dr. Alan T. Eaton, Extension Specialist, Entomology George Hamilton,
More informationDiPel ES Biological Insecticide Page DES-0001
ACTIVE INGREDIENT: Bacillus thuringiensis, subsp. kurstaki, strain ABTS-351, fermentation solids, spores, and insecticidal toxins........ 23.7% OTHER INGREDIENTS................................ 76.3% TOTAL.............................................
More informationOpen Questions on the Risks and Benefits of Copper Sprays on Tree Fruits
Open Questions on the Risks and Benefits of Copper Sprays on Tree Fruits New England, NY, & Canadian Fruit Workers Conference Burlington, VT October 22, 2013 Dave Rosenberger and Anne Rugh Assisted by
More informationSoil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 13/May/2003. Pest Description Pest 1 Type: W Code: ABUTH Abutilon theophrasti Common Name: Velvetleaf
Trial ID: CN Glyph Prod 03 Study Director: Location: Ashland Otto East Investigator: David L Regehr Crop Description Crop 1: ZEAMX Zea mays Corn Variety: Asgrow RX718RR : BCOR Planting Date: 6/May/2003
More informationAll About Lygus Management in Strawberry Production
UCCE Strawberry Lygus Bug Seminar Watsonville, CA - April 18, 2013 All About Lygus Management in Strawberry Production Frank Zalom Department of Entomology UC Davis Six steps of IPM From ENT 110, Arthropod
More informationDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY, USA
International Journal of Pest Management, October December 2006; 52(4): 303 315 Pest management and other agricultural practices among farmers growing cruciferous vegetables in the Central and Western
More informationArmyworm Scouting and Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador. Integrated Pest Management Research
Armyworm Scouting and Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador Integrated Pest Management Research 2013-2014 Project Lead: Leah Madore Pest Management Specialist Department of Natural Resources 1 Acknowledgements
More informationCALIFORNIA ICEBERG LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM. April 1, March 31, 2010
CALIFORNIA ICEBERG LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM April 1, 2009 - March 31, 2010 EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF LETTUCE DROP CAUSED BY SCLEROTINIA Krishna V. Subbarao Department of Plant Pathology, University of
More informationRhonda Simmons, Bo-Ming Wu, Ken Johnson, and Lindsey dutoit
Evaluating Actigard for Controlling Xanthomonas Blight in Carrot Seed Crops Rhonda Simmons, Bo-Ming Wu, Ken Johnson, and Lindsey dutoit Introduction Bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas hortorum pv.
More informationINSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS 2018 ENT 13 Prepared by Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist
INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOYBEANS 2018 ENT 13 Prepared by Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist Kentucky now ranks among the major soybean producing states. More insect problems have been associated
More informationCrop Profile for Alfalfa in Nebraska
Prepared: April, 2000 Crop Profile for Alfalfa in Nebraska General Production Information Nebraska is ranked second in the nation for alfalfa meal production and fifth for alfalfa hay production in 1998.
More informationSeedcorn. 12 For use only by commercial seed -treaters. Enhance AW imidacloprid captan vitavax. Danger 5 oz per 100 lbs seed --
SEED-BASED CONTROL of INSECTS The following tables show seed treatments and transgenic options available for insect control. Many commercial seed treatment contain combinations of ingredients (particularly
More informationAdvantages of ecological management of leafminers (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in commercial cultivation of crisphead lettuce in southern Brazil
Integrated Control in Protected Crops, Mediterranean Climate IOBC-WPRS Bulletin Vol. 80, 2012 pp. 223-227 Advantages of ecological management of leafminers (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in commercial cultivation
More informationPOISON KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN READ SAFETY DIRECTIONS BEFORE OPENING OR USING AXE INSECTICIDE
POISON KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN READ SAFETY DIRECTIONS BEFORE OPENING OR USING AXE INSECTICIDE ACTIVE CONSTITUENT: 500 g/l PERMETHRIN (40:60) SOLVENT: 396g/L LIQUID HYDROCARBONS GROUP 3A INSECTICIDE
More informationUse of Residual Herbicides for Tough to Control Weeds in Snap Beans Final Report for 2012
Use of Residual Herbicides for Tough to Control Weeds in Snap Beans Final Report for 2012 Submitted to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program c/o William Troxell, Executive Secretary 815
More informationGreen Manure Cover Crops Between Rows of Widely Spaced Vegetable Crops
Green Manure Cover Crops Between Rows of Widely Spaced Vegetable Crops Squash and pumpkin are grown with wide spaces between the rows. Tillage is commonly used to control the weeds between the rows but
More informationtests. Tolerant rices gave grain yields of nearly 3 t/ha when iron toxicity VARIETAL REACTIONS OF RICE TO IRON
VARIETAL REACTIONS OF RICE TO IRON TOXICITY ON AN ACID SULFATE SOIL F.N. Ponnamperuma and J.L. Solivas The International Rice Research Institute Los Baños, Philippines 1 Summary A total of 420 rices was
More informationIR-4 Western Regional Workshop. Dead Microbial Nematicides
IR-4 Western Regional Workshop Dead Microbial Nematicides EPA Registered Bionematicides that are Dead Dead = heat-killed or no viable cells in end product Marrone Bio Innovations Majestene - 94.46% heat-killed
More informationFirst report of field resistance by the stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) to Bt-transgenic maize
S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 2007, 24(3) 147 First report of field resistance by the stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) to Bt-transgenic maize J.B.J. van Rensburg ARC-Grain Crops Institute, Private Bag X1251,
More informationBIORATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR PESTS OF BRINJAL
Indian Journal of Entomology, 77(1): 51-55 (2015) DOI No. 10.5958/0974-8172.2015.00010.3 BIORATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR PESTS OF BRINJAL K.R. GOWRISH*, B. RAMESHA AND R. USHAKUMARI Department of Agricultural
More informationEfficacy of Trunk Micro-injected Dinocide (12% Dinotefuran) against Black Scale (Saissetia oleo) on California Pepper Trees (Schinus molle.
Efficacy of Trunk Micro-injected Dinocide (12% Dinotefuran) against Black Scale (Saissetia oleo) on California Pepper Trees (Schinus molle. Old Ranch Country Club, Seal Beach, California. August 31, 2015
More informationAlfalfa Stem Nematode Management in Alfalfa Production
Alfalfa Stem Nematode Management in Alfalfa Production Rachael Long, Farm Advisor, Yolo County Becky Westerdahl, Nematologist, UC Davis Dan Putnam, Agronomist, UC Davis Don Miller, Producer s Choice Seed
More informationApplication Form for a Temporary Derogation to Use an FSC Highly Hazardous Pesticide
Application Form for a Temporary Derogation to Use an FSC Highly Hazardous Pesticide A. General Requirements Application Submission date: Name, and contact details of certification body requesting a temporary
More informationCucurbit Insect Management and Aphid Outbreaks. Rick Weinzierl University of Illinois
Cucurbit Insect Management and Aphid Outbreaks Rick Weinzierl University of Illinois Illiana Vegetable Growers, January, 2016 Key insect pests in cucurbits Striped and spotted cucumber beetle Squash bugs
More informationBruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center
Trial: 2006-Headline Corn The effect of Headline fungicide on the yield of four corn hybrids. Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest
More informationExperimental Procedures:
Precision Products Sand-based Rootzone Localized Dry Spot Rescue Trial -2008 Cale A. Bigelow Ph.D. and Jared R. Nemitz Purdue University-West Lafayette, IN Objective: To evaluate the effects of four commercially
More informationYIELD OF IRRIGATED COOL-SEASON GRASSES IN SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS
Beef Cattle Research - 2005 YIELD OF IRRIGATED COOL-SEASON GRASSES IN SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS R. L. Hale 1, C. T. Thompson 1, T. J. Dumler 1, M. Hampton 2, and G. L. Gold 3 Summary Nine varieties and a commercial
More informationCrop Insect Losses Working Group
Arizona Spring Melon Insect Losses Workshop Crop Insect Loss and Impact Assessment Working Group July 2, 2007 Crop Insect Losses Working Group Goal: To provide information on insecticide-use patterns,
More informationSPRAYER CALIBRATION LAB To be able to repeat successful procedures and minimize expenses.
Notes for TPSS/PEPS 481 Lab 9: Sprayer calibration. Page 1 of 7. SPRAYER CALIBRATION LAB 9 A. Why is calibration important 1. To obtain the performance of a pesticide as specified on the product label.
More informationCALIFORNIA ICEBERG LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM. April 1, March 31, 2009
CALIFORNIA ICEBERG LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM April 1, 28 - March 31, 29 EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF LETTUCE DROP CAUSED BY SCLEROTINIA Krishna V. Subbarao Department of Plant Pathology, University of California,
More informationSMALL PLOT EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AGAINST THE SUGARCANE BORER, 2014
SMALL PLOT EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AGAINST THE SUGARCANE BORER, 2014 J.M. Beuzelin, T.E. Reagan, B.E. Wilson, M.T. VanWeelden, D. M. May LSU AgCenter, Department of Entomology The efficacy of insecticides
More information2004 CROP PRODUCTION EXAM Area Crops Contest
2004 CROP PRODUCTION EXAM Area Crops Contest Instructions: READ EACH MULTIPLE-CHOICE STATEMENT CAREFULLY AND THEN MARK THE ANSWER ON THE SCORE SHEET THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE BEST ANSWER. YOU MAY USE A CALCULATOR
More informationManaging Pesticide Resistance
Kentucky Pesticide Education Program copyright 2016 University of Kentucky Department of Entomology Managing Pesticide Resistance Pesticide resistance presents an increasing challenge to growers. A resistant
More information