Background and use of STEP AP 242 in the European Aerospace and Defence industries

Transcription

1 AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe Europe PDT Days 2014 (14-15 October Paris) Background and use of STEP AP 242 in the European Aerospace and Defence industries SSG Strategic Standards Group Presented by Jean-Yves DELAUNAY: Airbus Coordinator of the ASD SSG PLM Interoperability WG Co-chair of the AIA ASD Stan LOTAR project 1

2 Table of content Context of STEP AP 242 ed1 standard Overview of AP 242 ed1 functionalities Associated recommended practices and Implementer Forums Preparation of STEP AP 242 ed1 benchmarks Interdependencies of AP 242 ed1 with other key standards Status of progress of the STEP AP 242 edition 2 project ASD SSG recommendations of use of STEP AP 242 Summary Slide 2

3 Introduction Development of STEP AP 242 interoperability solutions based the V life cycle Business needs / use cases Operational solutions for the industry STEP AP 242 E1 standard STEP AP 242 E1 Recommended Practices STEP AP 242 E1 Interop. Test Rounds (led by Manufacturers) STEP AP 242 E1 Interop. Test Rounds (by vendors) STEP AP 242 E1 Pilots Benchmark Implementer Forum Slide 3

4 Summary of STEP AP242 edition 1 04 Quo vadis 214? STEP modularization workshop Recommendation to merge AP203 and AP214 CD ballot started After > 18 months technical work + several workshops 03 DIS doc. submitted 04 IS documentation sent to ISO Project kickoff WP Workshop Proposal: AP242 with BO Model 18 m plan 12/2011 WP published Stakeholders to decide CD Ballot resolution workshop DIS ballot started 07? AP242 ED1 published by ISO (target) Slide 4

5 AP242 edition1 Project organization Slide 5

6 STEP AP242: process coverage Slide 6

7 STEP AP242: information model coverage PDM PDM Part identification, Physical part Characteristics, Document Management General management information Activity and work management Effectivity Specification, Breakdown and configuration Presentation 3D Machining Form Features Production Rules Requirements Process Planning Mating definition 3D PMI (Product & Manufacturing Information) 3D assembly constraints 3D shape Data Quality 3D kinematics 2D draughting 3D exact explicit geometry 3D shape (explicit and parametric) 3D tessellated explicit geometry 3D parametric & constr. History 3D Composite design Slide 7

8 Effectivity Effectivity Characteristic Property Material Shape Association & Structure STEP AP242 Business Object Model capabilities Specification, Breakdown & Configuration Product Specification Breakdown Assembly Structure Configuration Part Occurrence Transf., Geom. Coord. Space & Coord. System Part Identification Part & Version Identification Part View Individual Part Individual Part Activity & Work Mgmt. Activity Work Mgmt. Delta Change General Mgmt. Information Person, Org. & Address Date & Time Approval, Contract & Project Identification Classification Information Right Name & Description Multi Linguism Composites Composite Structural Shape & Structure Document Management Document Identification Document Structure & Property Rules and Requirements Requirements Planned & Eval. Characteristics Process Plan Process Plan Mating Geometric & Ext. Elem. Ref. Geometric Shape Presentation & Draughting External References Kinematics Kinematic Structure & Links Kinematic Motion Slide 8

9 Illustration of STEP AP242 PDM Business Object Model Market Product Concept Individual Part Work Order Activity Method Specification Condition Assignment Condition Specification Category Product Class Specification Inclusion Assignment Specification Product Specification Product Configuration Product Design Association Conditional Configured Configuration Assembly Effectivity Configuration Alternative Solution Breakdown Breakdown Breakdown Version Breakdown Element Breakdown Element Version Breakdown Element View Individual Part Version Individual Part View Physical structure (ABS) Occurrence Occurrence NextAssembly Occurrence Usage Geometric Model Relationship With Placement Transformation Assembly structure Classification Classification Part Part Version Part View Part structure External Geometric Model Axis Placement Work Request Work management Organization Person Person or organization Effectivity Effectivity Relationship Effectivity Geometric Coordinate Space Positioning Activity Activity Approval Approval Document Document Version Digital Document Definition Document structure Digital File External Item External reference Slide 9

10 Overview of the CAD functionalities in STEP AP242 3D exact geometry 3D tessellated geometry Assembly structure 3D PMI (Product & Manufacturing Information) 3D GD&T 3D annotations 3D symbols Graphic Semantic Graphic Graphic User defined attributes Construction history Parametric Machining form feature Slide 10

11 Example of the STEP AP242 Semantic PMI for geometric tolerance PMI Design STEP AP242 ed 1 DIS PMI Design STEP AP242 ed 1 DIS symbol Standard status STEP AIM entity symbol Standard status STEP AIM entity Geometric tolerance ISO 1101 TBC centre_of_symmetry ISO 1101 YES straightness_tolerance ISO 1101 YES flatness_tolerance ISO 1101 YES roundness_tolerance ISO 1101 YES cylindricity_tolerance ISO 1101 YES line_profile_tolerance ISO 1101 YES surface_profile_tolerance ISO 1101 YES parallelism_tolerance ISO 1101 YES perpendicularity_tolerance ISO 1101 YES angularity_tolerance ISO 1101 YES line_profile_tolerance ISO 1101 YES surface_profile_tolerance ISO 1101 YES position_tolerance ISO 1101 YES concentricity_tolerance ISO 1101 YES coaxiality_tolerance ISO 1101 YES symmetry_tolerance ISO 1101 YES line_profile_tolerance ISO 1101 YES surface_profile_tolerance ISO 1101 YES circular_runout_tolerance ISO 1101 YES unequally_disposed_geometric_tolerance ISO 1101 YES projected_zone_definition ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES geometric_tolerance_with_modifiers ISO 1101 YES between_shape_aspect ISO 1101 TBC ISO 1101 YES all_around_shape_aspect ISO 1101 YES total_runout_tolerance Slide 11

12 STEP AP242 3D Tessellated geometry key highlights Compact form: 10 times smaller than previous STEP Faceted_Brep, 50 times when compressed (with existing Rec. Practices) Structured (as a Brep) and non-structured tessellation Compatible with all functionalities referencing 3D geometry : PMI, UDA, Kinematics, Electrical, Watertight and non-watertight Supports exact measurement on conical primitives, without the 3D exact Brep Reduces the size of graphic PMIs by 2+ (replaces PMI as polylines ) Supports sectioning & PMI cross highlight Links to 3D exact BRep when present Validation Properties Simple data model Easy to implement Slide 12

13 3D Composite design in the STEP AP242 Edition 1 STEP AP 242 ED1 STEP AP203 ed2 Exact implicit representation of composites Approximate 3D tessellated explicit representation of composite plies (New) Slide 13

14 Results based on the feedback of the 26 March 2014, AP242 conference in Paris and of recent updates. Summary of the STEP AP242 DIS CAD Implementation status Available Development In progress In Review Assembly 3D exact 3D tessellated Graphic PMI Semantic PMI Composite Coretechnologie Dassault Systèmes Datakit Eurostep ITI PTC Siemens PLM TechSoft3D T-Systems Slide 14

15 Status of STEP AP 242 Recommended Practices & associated activities of the Implementor Forums Slide 15

16 Status of development of CAx IF Rec. Practices for STEP AP 242 XML assembly structure Task of the CAx IF, supported by the LOTAR and JT IF projects Planning Initial draft ( 90% version) : 18 June nd version : 13 Aug Review phase : end of Sept Consolidation of the comments : 31 Oct Distribution for final review : beg. Nov st Release Version (completed content, test feedback) end Dec Maintenance To be part of the CAx IF, in relationship with setting up of the PDM IF Slide 16

17 PDM Implementer Forum White Paper Distribution for final comments before publication 1 Executive summary 2 Introduction 3 Terms and references 4 Context of the start of the activity 5 Requirements from Industry 6 Benefits of and business drivers for an international PDM-IF 7 Technical Principles of the PDM-IF and related motivations 8 General scope through the main tasks, covered use cases and deliverables 9 Project management 10 Summary - next actions Executive summary 1 Introduction 2 Terms and references 3 Project management (WP 0) 4 First year project plan 5 Technical principle of the PDM-IF : model based approach 6 PDM Interoperability use cases and associated prioritization (WP 1) 7 Coordination of the PDM-IF with other related PDM interoperability projects (WP 2 8 Development of PDM interoperability recommended practices (WP 3) 9 PDM interoperability test rounds (WP 4) 10 External communication/ publication (WP 5) 11 Summary - next actions Slide 17

18 PDM Interoperability: use cases, information model, and associated implementation technologies Slide 18

19 PDM Implementer Forum White Paper Next steps Sending of comments to the editorial team: : before 21 Oct International conference call to finalize the white paper : 22 Oct Distribution of the white paper : 31 Oct Presentation to the ISO /TC 184 /SC 4 Implementation Forum : Nov Official confirmation of participation to the PDM IF : before 30 Nov Preparation of contracts for PDM-IF participants : Jan. Feb Kick off conference call/meeting of the PDM-IF user group : Mid of Jan Prep. of the contracts to the PDM STEP interop. experts : Feb.-March 2015 Kick off meeting of the PDM-IF Implementer Group : March/April 2015 Slide 19

20 Objectives of AFNet ProSTEP ivip STEP AP 242 benchmark To join the industry efforts to speed up the availability of operational solutions by PLM vendors Based on COTS solutions (prototypes in some cases) To assess and present the level of functionalities of STEP AP 242 interfaces of COTS CAD-PDM applications, based on an agreed list of use cases and test cases Interoperability testing carried out by the users community, Complementary of the CAx Implementer Forum The AP 242 benchmark does not aim at developing STEP AP 242 recommended practices To communicate broadly the results of the tests, according to a fair and well defined procedure Involving the different involved manufacturing associations Taken into account feedbacks from the vendors Slide 20

21 Proposed use cases to be tested by the STEP AP 242 benchmark N 1 (according to resources available) Slide 21

22 STEP AP 242 benchmark N 1 Planning and received answers of PLM vendors PLANNING Start of preparation of the STEP AP 242 benchmark : March 2014 Invitation of the PLM vendors to the AP 242 benchmark : End of Aug Kick off confcal with all the AP 242 benchmark stakeholders : 14 Nov Preparation of the benchmark N 1 : Oct March 2015 Run of the STEP AP 242 benchmark N 1 : April 2015, for 6 months Test done in France (AFNet) and Germany (ProSTEP ivip) Planned results of the STEP AP 242 benchmark N 1 : Oct RECEIVED ANSWERS OF PLM VENDORS CAD-PDM vendors : Autodesk, Dassault Systemes, PTC, Siemens PLM solutions CAD STEP interface integrators / STEP viewers : Core Technologie, Datakit, Techsoft3D, PDM STEP interfaces integrators : EPM Jotne, TSystems, Eurostep, ProSTEP AG, Slide 22

23 Interdependencies of AP 242 ed1 with other key standards, STEP AP 242 ED1 (modular ARM and MIM) is part of STEP AP 209 ED2 Multi-Disciplinary Analysis and Design and of AP 210 ED3 Printed Circuit Board and Assembly» AP 242 ED1 includes the «requirement management» functionality of STEP AP 233 and AP 239 AP 242 ED1 «BO model» is partially harmonised with PLCS PSM V1.2 Ongoing actions to finalize the PDM harmonization Preparation of STEP AP 239 ED3 whitepaper Planned workshop in S AP 238 ED2 (Integrating CNC machining) shares key subsets with AP 242 3D geometry, 3D PMI, machining form features, etc. Slide 23

24 The core suite of STEP standards for PLM interoperability Process & use cases Concept Simulation Definition Manufacture Support Product Life Cycle Standards for Engineering processes and methods not described Disposal Information AP 233 Systems Engineering AP 209 Multi-disciplinary Analysis & design AP 242 (N1) Managed Model Based 3D Engineering AP 238 Integrated CNC Machining Suite of AIA - ASD ILS Specs (SX000) Based on PLCS AP 239 Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) AP 210 (N2) Electronic assembly, interconnect & packaging design. AP 235 (N2) Engineering Properties for product design & verification N1: STEP AP 242: Convergence of AP 203 and AP 214 N2: study not started Slide 24

25 High level functionalities planned for STEP AP242 edition 2 Slide 25

26 Overview of the planned capabilities of the AP242 ed2 extension for elec. Harness AP242 ed2 planned capabilities for physical electrical harness design: - Harness parts: connector, fixing, backshell, grommet, splice, wire, protection - Connectivity: connection list, wire list Wire number From To Pin From Pin To Type/gage Connector A Connector B 1 3 Alu Connector A Connector C 2 A Cu 12 - Topology and Geometry: segment, node, fixing place, protection location, routing Slide 26

27 3D geometry information model & other generic resources specific construction history and parametric entities Support of 3D scan data Curved triangles Voxels Surface texture 3D PMI information model Support of enhancement of ISO & ASME Design standards XML implementation model for 3D PMI semantic representation 3D mechanical design information model new Manufacturing machining features and quality analysis design information for 3D additive manufacturing parts 3D composite design information model Additive manafacturing information PDM information Illustration of the other extensions planned for the STEP AP242 ed2 Finalize PDM harmonization between AP242 ED2 and AP239 ED3 Product Life Cycle Support Slide 27

28 Target Project Plan Overview High Level Milestones 2/2 New Work Item Approved July 18, 2015 Kickoff telconf: September Plenary workshop: September CD Ballot Begins June 2015 DIS Ballot Begins February 2016 IS Submitted to ISO for Publicat. Nov AP 242 Ed2 Virtual Kickoff - September 2, 2014 PDES, Inc. 28

29 ASD SSG recommendations for STEP AP 242 ASD SSG & STEP AP242 Edition 1 Standardization project web page: Slide 29

30 ASD SSG recommendations for the use of STEP AP242 Adoption Plan At short term, ASD recognizes AP242 as the targeted standard replacing AP203 and AP214. ASD will adopt AP242 through its direct participation to the ISO standardization process. The ASD SSG recommends the continuation of the CAx Implementer Forum for: qualification of AP 242 interfaces for CAD mechanical, CAD composite design, CAD Kinematics The development of the related AP 242 CAx Recommended Practices. The ASD SSG recommends the setting up of the PDM Implementer Forum for: qualification of AP 242 PDM interfaces of PLM vendors, The development of AP 242 PDM Recommended Practices. ASD recommendation The SSG will recommend the use of AP 242 in preference to AP 203 and AP 214 for exchange, sharing and LT archiving of Managed Model Based 3D Engineering. The SSG recommends supporting the development of the AP 242 edition 2 project (See other component standard for AP 242 edition 2, in preparation) Slide 30

31 Summary of actions to prepare operational solutions for STEP AP 242 edition 1 standard Business needs / use cases Operational solutions for the industry) STEP AP 242 E1 standard STEP AP 242 E1 Recommended Practices STEP AP 242 E1 Interop. Test Rounds (led by Manufacturers) STEP AP 242 E1 Interop. Test Rounds (by vendors) STEP AP 242 E1 Pilots Benchmark Implementer Forum Slide 31

32 STEP AP242 public web site Slide 32

33 Slide 33

34 Slide 34

35 STEP AP242 3D machining form features Replicate feature (Rectangular, circular & general pattern) Transition feature (Chamfer, Fillet, Edge round) Marking feature Catalogue Defined marking Compound feature Pocket (Rectangular closed/open pocket, General_pocket, Cutoutfeature, Recess) Gear (Catalogue, Defined [spur, Helical, Helical/ Straight bevel]) boss (Circular, Rectangular, general boss) Hole (Round, Counterbore & Countersunk) Knurl Catalogue, Turned [Diagonal, Diamond, Straight] slot (open/closed) Profile feature General removal Planar face Protrusion Rib top volume Rounded end step Slide 35

36 Scope of STEP AP 242 benchmark N 1 Relevant Documents/Specifications to be tested STEP AP 242 IS Related AP 242 Recommended Practices (newest releases) Relevant Software: Based on software (COTS) provided by vendors Choice of applications (Creo, NX, Catia V5/V6, Solid Works, AutoCAD, etc) and associated versions! Taken into account the level of maturity / testing of STEP AP 242 interfaces CAx IF, feedback of industries Benchmark Steering Group has to define which CAD-Systems PDM Systems Translators Viewers STEP validation and verification tools Scope of the benchmark related to resources available of manufacturers associations Slide 36