RE: California
|
|
- Derick Neal
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Keith Pryor In-term Design Review Chair 248 Champa Street Denver, CO Nov. 4, 208 Landmark Preservation Commission Brittnay Bryant Senior City Planner Community Planning and Development City and County of Denver via RE: California Dear Commission, This project has come together quite nicely. Curtis Park Neighbors met with the applicant on Oct 30 th 208. We had a good discussion and brought up concerns which the applicant has since addressed. We feel that the large window above the door broken down as a 2 over 2 is much more appropriate and fits with the neighborhood character. The cornice is much stronger as well. The design committee feels this infill is compatible with the mass scale and context of the neighborhood and recommends approval by the commission. A few things we would like the commissionaire s to consider for the Design detail of the project would be the color of the brick, medium red is what works best for Curtis Park. Also the porch railings and how they are constructed. The railing materials and size need to be studied so that they relate to porch railings found in Curtis Park. Thank you for your time and consideration, Keith Pryor In Term Chair, Curtis Park Design Review Committee Curtis Park Neighbors, Inc Curtis Park Neighbors, Inc. curtis-park-neighbors-board@googlegroups.com A Denver Registered Neighborhood Organization
2 CALIFORNIA STREET ROWHOMES 2844 CALIFORNIA ST AND 2848 CALIFORNIA ST, DENVER, COLORADO INFILL PART : MASS, FORM & CONTEXT REVIEW THE PROJECT SUBMITTAL IS FOR A SIX UNIT ROWHOME PROJECT TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE CURRENTLY VACANT SITE THAT IS COMPRISED OF 2844 AND 2848 CALIFORNIA ST IN THE CURTIS PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE 2 BED, 2 /2 UNITS ARE TWO STORIES AND TO BE CONSTRUCTED OVER CRAWL SPACE. EACH UNIT IS APPROXIMATELY 600 SF IN GROSS FLOOR AREA. THE DESIGN HAS DRAWN FROM THE TALL NARROW MASSING FORMS FOUND THROUGHOUT CURTIS PARK. THE FORM WAS PARTICULARLY INSPIRED BY THE ITALIANATE HOMES ON NARROW 25' WIDE LOTS THAT ARE COMMON THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE TALL NARROW, HUNG WINDOW FORMS ARE ARTICULATED IN THE BRICK PATTERNING. THE RECESSED ENTRIES PLAY A SECONDARY ROLE TO THE ACCENTUATED AND WIDER BRICK FORE FACADE TO CREATE A CONTINUOUS RHYTHM ALONG THE STREET FACE OF THE PROJECT. THE BUILDING IS SETBACK FROM THE STREET TO ALIGN WITH THE STRUCTURES ON EITHER SIDE AND THE PORCH AND FIRST FLOOR LEVEL ARE RAISED TO ALSO MATCH THE ADJACENT STRUCTURES. EACH UNIT HAS A SMALL FRONT PORCH WITH A LOW STEEL RAIL, A MODERN PLAY ON WHAT IS COMMON OF THE MULTI FAMILY BUILDINGS IN THE AREA. THE ENTRY CANOPY WORKS AS A MODERN INTERPRETATION OF THE STOOP COVERS THAT ARE FOUND THROUGHOUT THE CURTIS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. THE FIRST FLOOR HEIGHT OF FEET FLOOR TO FLOOR IS COMMON OF THE HISTORIC STRUCTURES OF THE AREA AND THE UPPER LEVEL IS VISUALLY LOWERED WITH THE OVERSIZED METAL CORNICE DETAIL. LM-0. LANDMARK COVER SHEET
3 PROJECT DATA EXTG. ADDRESS CALIFORNIA ST ZONING U-RH-2.5 HISTORIC DISTRICT CURTIS PARK LOT SIZE 2,664 SF BUILDING FORM ROWHOME TOTAL UNITS 6 LOT WIDTH 00' -3" LOT DEPTH 26' -37/8" SETBACK (BLOCK SENSITIVE) 5.9' (5'-03/4") SETBACK PROVIDED 7.6' (7'-7/4") STORIES FRONT 65% ALLOWABLE PROVIDED 2 HEIGHT FRONT 65% ALLOWABLE 35' -PROVIDED 30'-27/8" FRONT BASE PLANE ( )/2 = 522.5' = ARCH 97'-0" REAR BASE PLANE ( )/2 = 523.0' = ARCH 97'-6" BUILDING FOOTPRINT MAIN STRUCTURE GARAGE 4805 SF 798 SF LOT COVERAGE 52% N LM-.0 SURROUNDING CONTEXT
4 GROUND PLAN COMPARISON DATA TABLE A B C D SE BLOCK FACE OF 2800 BLOCK OF CALIFORNIA ST NW BLOCK FACE OF 2800 BLOCK OF CALIFORNIA ST ADDRESS SETBACK TO STRUCUTRE SETBACK TO PORCH DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES (SOUTH) 2858 CALIFORNIA 0'- 3 5/8" 0'- 3 5/8" 0'- 4" (TO PROPOSED) 2844 CALIFORNIA (PROPOSED) 7'- 7 3/8" '- /2" 6'-" (PROPOSED) 2840 CALIFORNIA 5'- 0 3/4" 8'-2" 2838 CALIFORNIA 5'- 9 5/8" 2828 CALIFORNIA 20'- /4" 2'-3" 2824 CALIFORNIA 20'- 4 3/4" 20'-4 3/4" 2820 CALIFORNIA 20'- 3 5/8" 8'-3" 284 CALIFORNIA 9'- 0 3/4" 6'-3" 2808 CALIFORNIA 9'- 0 3/4" 9'-0 3/4" 62 E 28TH ST 0'- 0" 0'-0" 70 E 28TH ST 0'-0" 0'-0" 283 CALIFORNIA 2'-0" 6'-3" 289 CALIFORNIA 2'- 0" 6'-3" 5'-9 5/8" 3'-2" '-6" 2'-0" 0'-2" 9'-4" '-6" 9'-6" 4'-0" 3'-0" 282 CALIFORNIA 2'-7" 6'-9" 4'-3" 2827 CALIFORNIA 2'-0" 8'-5" 5'-5" 283 CALIFORNIA 4'-" 8'-" 2'-6" N/A N/A STRUCTURE WIDTH ESTIMATED AT STREET FACING MAIN BODY 2' -0" 4' -" (PER UNIT) 22' -0" 22' -0" 2' -6" 4' -3" 27' -6" 8' -9" 20' -6" 30' -9" 52' -9" 23' -0" 22' -0" 20' -6" 2' -0" 2' -6" 28TH ST 26' - 3 7/8" 62 28TH ST 70 E 28TH 2808 CALIFORNIA 283 CALIFORNIA 284 CALIFORNIA 289 CALIFORNIA 2820 CALIFORNIA 282 CALIFORNIA 2827 CALIFORNIA 283 CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ST 80' R.O.W. D D A B C 2824 CALIFORNIA 2828 CALIFORNIA 2838 CALIFORNIA 2840 CALIFORNIA DENVER LANGUAGE SCHOOL (FIELD) CALIFORNIA PROPOSED INFILL D 2858 CALIFORNIA 29TH ST 6' PUBLIC ALLEY 400' - 0" GROUND PLAN COMPARISION " = 50'-0" N LM-. BLOCK CONTEXT
5 PARAPET HIGH 23' - 9 /8" L-2 ' - 3/4" C C L- 00' - 0" FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" A A 2858 CALIFORNIA 2844 CALIFORNIA (PROPOSED) B B 2840 CALIFORNIA 2838 CALIFORNIA 2828 CALIFORNIA 2824 CALIFORNIA 2820 CALIFORNIA 284 CALIFORNIA 2808 CALIFORNIA 62 E 28TH ST FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" CONTEXT WEST " = 30'-0" BLOCK FACE COMPARISON DATA TABLE ADDRESS A B C ENTRY/ PORCH HEIGHT (FROM B.P.) SECOND STORY (FROM B.P.) OVERALL HEIGHT (FROM B.P.) SE BLOCK FACE OF 2800 BLOCK OF CALIFORNIA ST 2858 CALIFORNIA -2 STORY 3' -6" 3' -7 3/4" 33' -8" 2844 CALIFORNIA - 2 STORY (PROPOSED) 2840 CALIFORNIA -STORY AND A HALF 2' -" 3' -0" 2838 CALIFORNIA -STORY AND A HALF 2' -" 2828 CALIFORNIA - SINGLE STORY 2' - 0" NA 2824 CALIFORNIA -2 STORY ' -6" 0' -8" 2820 CALIFORNIA -STORY AND A HALF 5' -6" 5' -0" 284 CALIFORNIA - SINGLE STORY ' - 2" NA 2808 CALIFORNIA -2 STORY ' -0" 0' -6" 62 E 28TH ST -2 STORY APARTMENT FACES E 28TH 9' -9" 2' -" 3' -73/4" 26' -3"(PROPOSED) 3' -0" 25' -0" 25' -0" 9' -8" 23' -3" 29' -6" 5' -" 22' -2" 2' -7" LM-.2 BLOCK FACE
6 2858 CALIFORNIA 26' - 3 7/8" 00' - 3" CALIFORNIA ST 5' - 3/8" 90' - 0 /4" 5' - 3/8" PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH 2854 CALIFORNIA FFE = ' 2852 CALIFORNIA FFE = ' 2850 CALIFORNIA FFE = ' 2848 CALIFORNIA FFE = ' 2846 CALIFORNIA FFE = ' 2844 CALIFORNIA FFE = ' 4' - " TYP. ONE CAR GARAGE ONE CAR GARAGE ONE CAR GARAGE ONE CAR GARAGE ONE CAR GARAGE ONE CAR GARAGE 7' - 7 3/8" 54' - 0 3/8" 27' - 4 7/8" 20' - 2 /2" 7' - 0 3/4" GARAGE APRON 6' - 0" ALLEY 6' PUBLIC ALLEY 5' - 0 3/4" 90' - /2" 5' - 0 3/4" N 2840 CALIFORNIA LM SITE PLAN /6" = '-0" LM-.3 SITE PLAN
7 PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY LIVING LIVING LIVING LIVING LIVING LIVING 2844 CALIFORNIA 2846 CALIFORNIA 2848 CALIFORNIA 2850 CALIFORNIA 2852 CALIFORNIA 2854 CALIFORNIA 5' - 2 /8" 4' - " 4' - " 4' - " 4' - " 5' - 2 /8" DINING DINING DINING DINING DINING DINING UP PWDR PWDR PWDR PWDR PWDR PWDR KITCHEN REF. KITCHEN REF. KITCHEN REF. KITCHEN REF. KITCHEN REF. REF. KITCHEN MUD MUD MUD MUD MUD MUD DW DW DW DW DW DW UP LANDMARK L- /8" = '-0" N LM-.4 LEVEL PLAN
8 BED_ BED_ BED_ BED_ BED_ BED_ CL_ CL_ CL_ CL_ CL_ CL_ W D W D W D W D W D W D DN DN DN DN DN DN BATH BATH BATH BATH BATH BATH HALL HALL HALL HALL HALL HALL BATH_ BATH_ BATH_ BATH_ BATH_ BATH_ CL CL CL CL CL CL BED BED BED BED BED BED LANDMARK L-2 /8" = '-0" N LM-.5 LEVEL 2 PLAN
9 0' - /4" 5' - 0 7/8" BED_2 CL_2 D W LAUNDRY BATH_2 DN HALL LINEN M_BATH M_CL- M_CL-2 M_BED 5' - 2 /8" 54' - 0 3/8" ' - 3 7/8" 2 LM END UNIT - L-2 3/6" = '-0" 0' - /4" 5' - 0 7/8" ENTRY LIVING TV/MEDIA WALL STORAGE DINING UP PWDR PANTRY CL REF. KITCHEN MUD_ DW UP 5' - 2 /8" 3' - 0" 5' - 7 7/8" 54' - 0 3/8" ' - 3 7/8" 2' - /8" LM END UNIT - L- 3/6" = '-0" LM-.6 TYP. END UNIT PLANS
10 9' - 0 /8" 5' - 0 7/8" BED_2 CL_2 D W LAUNDRY BATH_2 DN HALL LINEN M_BATH M_CL- M_CL-2 M_BED ' - 9 /2" 4' - 0" 4' - " 2 LM MID UNIT - L-2 3/6" = '-0" 9' - 0 /8" 5' - 0 7/8" ENTRY LIVING TV/MEDIA WALL STORAGE DINING UP PWDR PANTRY CL REF. KITCHEN MUD_ DW 4' - " 5' - 7 7/8" 54' - 0 3/8" 3' - 4 3/4" LM MID UNIT - L- 3/6" = '-0" LM-.7 TYP. MID UNIT PLANS
11 PARAPET HIGH 23' - 9 /8" PARAPET HIGH 23' - 9 /8" T.O.P. L-2 9' - 8 7/8" L-2 ' - 3/4" T.O.P. L- 0' - /8" 0' - /8" 9' - 7 7/8" L-2 ' - 3/4" T.O.P. L- 0' - /8" 0' - /8" 9' - 8 3/8" L- 00' - 0" L- 00' - 0" FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" T.O.F. 94' - 0" T.O.F. 94' - 0" 2 LM TYP W WALL SECTION ENTRY /4" = '-0" LM TYP W WALL SECTION /4" = '-0" LM-2. WALL SECTIONS
12 3-D SECTION - TYP ENTRY LM-2.2 ISOMETRIC SECTION
13 PARAPET HIGH 23' - 9 /8" PARAPET LOW 22' - 5 /8" CL OF R.O.W. 8' - /8" ROADWAY FACE OF CURB 5' - 0 5/8" TREE LAWN EDGE OF WALK EDGE OF WALK PROPERTY LINE 5' - 0" ' - 0/4" SIDEWALK 7' - 7 3/8" SETBACK 26' - 3 /8" OVERALL HEIGHT T.O.P. L-2 9' - 8 7/8" L-2 ' - 3/4" T.O.P. L- 0' - /8" L- 00' - 0" FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" LM TYP STREET SECTION /8" = '-0" LM-2.3 STREET SECTION
14 PARAPET LOW 22' - 5/8" T.O.P. L-2 9' - 87/8" PL PL 5' - 0" TYP. 2' - 6" TYP. 24' - /8" L-2 ' - 3/4" L- 00' - 0" FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" 2 LANDMARK EAST (REAR) /8" = '-0" TYP PORCH HEIGHT 2' - " 2' - 0" LOW RAIL HEIGHT 2' - 6" TYP. 6' - 0" TYP. 3' - 9" 3' - 0" ' - 7" TALL RAIL HEIGHT 2' - 6" ' - 3/4" 8' - 7 /8" 4' - 0 /4" 26' - 3 /8" OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT PARAPET HIGH 23' - 9 /8" T.O.P. L-2 9' - 8 7/8" L-2 ' - 3/4" L- 00' - 0" FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" LANDMARK WEST (STREET) /8" = '-0" LM-3. ELEVATIONS
15 PL PL PL PL GARAGE PARAPET 09' - 6 5/8" REAR B.P. 96' - 6 /2" 3' - 0 /8" 24' - /8" 2' - " 2' - 6" ' - 3/4" 8' - 7 /8" 4' - 0 /4" 26' - 3 /8" PARAPET HIGH 23' - 9 /8" T.O.P. L-2 9' - 8 7/8" L-2 ' - 3/4" L- 00' - 0" FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" 2 LANDMARK NORTH " = 0'-0" PARAPET HIGH 23' - 9 /8" T.O.P. L-2 9' - 8 7/8" 4' - 0 /4" L-2 ' - 3/4" L- 00' - 0" FRONT B.P. 97' - 6" 26' - 3 /8" 2' - 6" ' - 3/4" 8' - 7 /8" 2' - " 24' - /8" 3' - 0 /8" GARAGE PARAPET 09' - 6 5/8" REAR B.P. 96' - 6 /2" LANDMARK SOUTH " = 0'-0" LM-3.2 ELEVATIONS
16 GARAGE PARAPET 09' - 65/8" T.O.P. GARAGE 07' - 05/8" T.O. GARAGE FDN 97' - /2" REAR B.P. 96' - 6 /2" 2 LANDMARK WEST (GARAGE) /8" = '-0" GARAGE PARAPET 09' - 65/8" T.O.P. GARAGE 07' - 05/8" GARAGE TH 97' - 0 /2" 3' - 0 /8" REAR B.P. 96' - 6 /2" LANDMARK EAST (GARAGE) /8" = '-0" LM-3.3 GARAGE ELEVATIONS
17 3D STREET VIEW LM-4. 3-D VIEWS
18 2 3D BIRDS EYE 3D FROM N/W LM D VIEWS
19 ADDRESS: 2544 STOUT ST ADDRESS: 2542 STOUT ST ADDRESS: 285 CHAMPA ST ADDRESS: NO. OF FLOORS: 2 NO. OF FLOORS: 2 NO. OF FLOORS: 2 NO. OF FLOORS: 2 ROOF SHAPE: FLAT ROOF SHAPE: FLAT ROOF SHAPE: FLAT ROOF SHAPE: FLAT MAIN MATERIAL: BRICK MAIN MATERIAL: BRICK MAIN MATERIAL: BRICK MAIN MATERIAL: BRICK SECONDARY MATERIAL: PAINTED WOOD PORCH: FULL EXPOSED FOUNDATION: YES OVERALL HEIGHT: 30'-0" +/- OVERALL WIDTH: 2'-0" +/- COMPATABILITY: CORNICE ELEMENTS, RECESSED WINDOWS, ENTRY DOOR W/ TRANSOM WINDOW, ENTRY COVER W/ FULL WIDTH PORCH, BRICK BANDING, BRICK WINDOW HEAD DETAIL W/ MASONRY SILL. SECONDARY MATERIAL: PAINTED WOOD PORCH: NONE EXPOSED FOUNDATION: YES OVERALL HEIGHT: 30'-0" +/- OVERALL WIDTH: 2' -0" +/- COMPATABILITY: CORNICE ELEMENTS, RECESSED WINDOWS, ENTRY DOOR W/ TRANSOM WINDOW, WINDOW HEAD DETAIL W/ MASONRY SILL. SECONDARY MATERIAL: PAINTED WOOD PORCH: 2/3 EXPOSED FOUNDATION: YES OVERALL HEIGHT: 24'-6" +/- OVERALL WIDTH: 2'-0" +/- COMPATABILITY: CORNICE ELEMENTS, RECESSED WINDOWS, 2/3 WIDTH PORCH, BRICK BANDING, BRICK WINDOW HEAD DETAIL W/ MASONRY SILL. SECONDARY MATERIAL: PAINTED WOOD / POWDERCOATED METAL PORCH: 3/4 EXPOSED FOUNDATION: YES OVERALL HEIGHT: 26'-3" OVERALL WIDTH: 4'-" PER UNIT (90'-0" OVERALL BUILDING) COMPATABILITY: CORNICE ELEMENTS, RECESSED WINDOWS, ENTRY DOOR W/ TRANSOM WINDOW, ENTRY COVER W/ FULL WIDTH PORCH, BRICK BANDING, BRICK WINDOW HEAD DETAIL W/ MASONRY SILL. LM-5. COMPATIBILITY DEMONSTRATION
20 ADDRESS: 2355, 2357, 2359, 236, 2363, 2365 STOUT ST NO. OF FLOORS: 2 NO. OF UNITS: 6 -(SHARED ENTRIES) ROOF SHAPE: FLAT -SCREENED BY DECORATIVE PARAPET MAIN MATERIAL: STONE SECONDARY MATERIAL: PAINTED WOOD PORCH: COVERED STOOP EXPOSED FOUNDATION: STONE OVERALL HEIGHT: APPROX 35'-9" OVERALL (30'-9" TOP OF MAIN CORNICE) OVERALL WIDTH: 25' PORCH TO PORCH -PER 2 UNITS (APPROX. 75'-0" OVERALL BUILDING) COMPATABILITY: ARTICULATED/UNDULATING FACADE, CORNICE ELEMENTS, RECESSED ENTRY ZONE, RECESSED WINDOWS, ENTRY DOOR W/ TRANSOM WINDOW, COVERED ENTRY STOOP, STONE BANDING, STONE WINDOW HEAD DETAIL W/ STONE SILL. ONE-OVER- ONE NARROW HUNG WINDOWS ADDRESS: 2700, 2700a, 2704a, 2704b, 2708, 2708a, 272, 272a, 274, 274a STOUT ST NO. OF FLOORS: 2 NO. OF UNITS: 0 -(SHARED ENTRIES) ROOF SHAPE: FLAT -SCREENED BY DECORATIVE PARAPET MAIN MATERIAL: PAINTED BRICK SECONDARY MATERIAL: PAINTED WOOD / POWDERCOATED METAL PORCH: UNCOVERED STOOP EXPOSED FOUNDATION: YES - PAINTED OVERALL HEIGHT: APPROX 33'-0" OVERALL (30'-0" TOP OF MAIN CORNICE) OVERALL WIDTH: 20' ENTRY TO ENTRY -PER 2 UNITS (APPROX. 00'-0" OVERALL BUILDING) COMPATABILITY: ARTICULATED/UNDULATING FACADE, CORNICE ELEMENTS, RECESSED ENTRY ZONE, RECESSED WINDOWS, ENTRY DOOR W/ TRANSOM WINDOW, COVERED ENTRY STOOP, STONE BANDING, STONE WINDOW HEAD DETAIL W/ STONE SILL. ADDRESS: NO. OF FLOORS: 2 NO. OF UNITS: 6 -(INDIVIDUAL ENTRIES) ROOF SHAPE: FLAT MAIN MATERIAL: BRICK SECONDARY MATERIAL: PAINTED WOOD / POWDERCOATED METAL PORCH: 3/4 EXPOSED FOUNDATION: YES OVERALL HEIGHT: 26'-3" OVERALL WIDTH: 4'-" PER UNIT (90'-0" OVERALL BUILDING) COMPATABILITY: ARTICULATED/UNDULATING FACADE, CORNICE ELEMENTS, RECESSED WINDOWS, ENTRY DOOR W/ TRANSOM WINDOW, ENTRY COVER W/ FULL WIDTH PORCH, BRICK BANDING, BRICK WINDOW HEAD DETAIL W/ MASONRY SILL. ONE-OVER-ONE NARROW HUNG WINDOWS. LM-5.2 COMPATIBILITY DEMONSTRATION
21 ELEMENT CHARACTER OF CURTIS PARK ELEMENT CHARACTER OF MASS & FORM Height: One to two stories in height. Raised foundations and tall ceiling heights provide for tall houses, over 30 feet high, on some blocks. Shape: Single-family residences are prevalent with multi-family row houses and duplex forms intermixed. Massing is blocky and rectangular on most homes, although projecting bays, corner towers and asymmetrical forms are also common on larger two-story homes and buildings. MASS & FORM Italianate inspired form of two stories in height with raised foundation and tall ceilings. Overall height of approx 26'-3" above base plane. Blocky rectangular massing with vertical elements creating a continuous rythm across the street facing facade. Main level is taller than the upper level, making the main floor dominate in the facade. The ornamental cornice, with it's horizontal lines, ties the building together at the street. MATERIALS Predominately unpainted brick construction with a small number of stone and frame structures. Foundations are typically brick or stone. Brick structures are typically smooth cut, earth-tone orange brick. Wood siding, porches and details. MATERIALS Facade is predominately unpainted brick with some prefinished metal at the recessed entries and forming the cornice. ROOFS Hipped and flat roofs typical on the Italianate-style buildings while Queen Anne and Eastlake style houses typically feature a front gabled roof, sometimes with flared roof eaves. Some mansard, conical, raised decorative parapets and complex hipped and gabled roofs are also found. Some Italianate houses feature broad overhanging eaves with decorative brackets; a few include ornamental iron roof cresting. Dormers are rare. Composite shingles are the most frequently used modern roofing material, imitating original wood shingle roofs. ROOFS Flat roof conceled behined the corniced parapet. ENTRIES & DOORS Offset front entries accessed by raised porches. Wooden single and double doors common; some Italianate examples feature narrow double doors. Most original doors have one or two panes of glass above, with wood paneling below, although some doors are full paneled. Doors with transoms are common; some have sidelights. Multi-family structures have smaller projecting porches, stoops or recessed entries. ENTRIES & DOORS Recessed entries accessed by smaller projecting porches. The doors are wood paneled half-light doors with transom windows above. WINDOWS Individual double-hung, one-over-one wood windows common, although framed window pairs in gable ends, window transoms, and other variations are also found. Most structures feature tall narrow windows, although some paired and arched windows are wider and more rectangular in form. Rounded and segmental arched lintels are common, although other variations such as wooden pedimented lintels, stone drip molds and horizontal stone lintel bands are also found. Highly decorative masonry headers and lintels contribute to building ornamentation. Historically, windows were recessed in the wall (not flush). WINDOWS Windows are predominately hung windows, tall and narrow, as is common on the Italianate style in the neighborhood. The windows on the street facade are placed in a one-over-one layout and tied together with the brick detailing between. Lintels and sills are kept simple with half-brick soldier courses. PORCHES Width: Partial-width and full-width porches are common. Height: Typically one story. Materials: Masonry and wood foundations common. Wooden columns, railings and ornamentation. PORCHES Partial width, one story porch. Masonry construction with low rail as is common in the Curtis park district. LM-5.3 CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES
STAFF BRIEF. Design Practice Paul Norquist
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Zeke Freeman, Root Architecture & Development LLC
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Project Scope and Staff Summary Under Review:
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More information4. GUIDELINES FOR NEW BUILDINGS & NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS
4. GUIDELINES FOR NEW BUILDINGS & NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS Construction of New Buildings in Historic Districts and Alterations or Additions to Non-contributing Structures in Historic Districts This chapter
More informationSECTION 6.3 DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT (DTH)
SECTION 6.3 DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT (DTH) A. Purpose Wylie's downtown has been identified by the Comprehensive Plan as a valuable resource worthy of preservation as a historic district. This district
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Anchen Wang Sustronk6 LLC
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More information306 6th Street SW
306 6th Street SW 104-0213-0132 Primary Resource Information: Single Dwelling, Stories 2.00, Style: Other, ca 1890 July 2006: This 1890s, 2-story, 2-bay, cross-gabled, side-passage vernacular frame dwelling
More informationCountry Club Historic District Architecture Review Committee
Country Club Historic District Architecture Review Committee Project: 378 Lafayette St November 8, 018 Dear Landmark Preservation, Our committee would recommend the project @ 378 Lafayette, Rear Addition,
More information11.0 Commercial Infill
11.0 Commercial Infill 11.1 INTRODUCTION Infill is the process of building a new structure on a vacant site within an existing neighborhood. These Infill guidelines are also applicable to the review of
More informationNeighborhood Traditional Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.010 - Neighborhood Traditional Single-Family Districts ( NT ) Typical Houses in a Neighborhood Traditional District Typical Block in a Neighborhood Traditional District Common Features of
More informationIntroduction. Massing and Overall Form. Ridgeview Estates. Ridgeview Estates is a 48 lot, single-family home community by Trammel Crow.
Introduction is a 48 lot, single-family home community by Trammel Crow. Massing and Overall Form consists of single and two-story, asymmetrically configured homes. Multi-level, staggered rooflines, red
More informationMaintaining Materials Within the District
Maintaining Materials Within the District The prevalent styles found within the district utilize various common building materials of the Tampa Bay area. Wood siding and brick flourish as the dominant
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Project Scope Under Review: Remove a rear shed roof addition, and construct a 898 square foot, 2 story gable roof addition.
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationProposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018
Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018 [Add the following new section to R-1A and R-1B (as 19.06.030 and 19.08.0925 respectively)] [19.06.030 / 19.08.025] Neighborhood Design
More informationCHAPTER 15 THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA
CHAPTER 15 THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CHARACTER AREA The Commercial District Character Area constitutes the business core of the historic downtown, in which most buildings were constructed with storefronts
More informationIntroduction. Massing and Overall Form. Catalina. Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc.
Introduction Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc. Massing and Overall Form This neighborhood comprises single-story, asymmetrical plan homes with asymmetrical facades.
More informationResidential Uses in the Historic Village Core
BLACK DIAMOND DESIGN GUIDLINES for Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core Adopted June 18, 2009 Introduction and Purpose These guidelines are intended to guide infill development within the Historic
More informationNEW CONSTRUCTION ADDENDUM TO COA APPLICATION
NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDENDUM TO COA APPLICATION Property Owner Address City, ST Zip Phone Fax Street Address Tax Parcel Historic ID C N P F I HPC HDC Staff Project Description: Check all that apply. Primary
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Kristin Park
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationKNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
KNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION PROPERTY ADDRESS: 227 Leonard Pl FILE NO.: 8 F 15 HZ DISTRICT: Ft. Sanders NC 1 MEETING DATE: 8/20/2015 APPLICANT:
More informationNEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERMENT ZONE (NEZ) IMPACT FEE WAIVER CHECKLIST
NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERMENT ZONE (NEZ) IMPACT FEE WAIVER CHECKLIST Approval Process Flowchart Application Checklist Letter of Intent Guidelines Application Guidelines for New Construction Limits of NEZ NEZ
More informationStaff Review June 12, 2013
Charlotte Historic District Commission Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness Staff Review June 12, 2013 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:, Dilworth Local Historic District HDC 2013-068 SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
More informationIntroduction. Massing and Overall Form. Andalusia I and II
Introduction Built in 1984-1985, (67 lot) and II (53 lot) are singlefamily home communities by Dix Custom Homes. The average size of each residence is 3645 SF. Massing and Overall Form and II include single
More informationStaff Review Date: July 12, 2017 HDC PID#
Charlotte Historic District Commission Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness Staff Review Date: July, 2017 HDC 2017-55 PID# 07102409 LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUMMY OF REQUEST:
More informationResidential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS ORDINANCE DRAFT 9 AUGUST 2013 17.25 Residential Design Standards 17.25.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum design standards for new residential
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Multi-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.030 - Neighborhood Suburban Multi-Family District ( NSM ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Multi-Family Uses in NSM Sections: 16.20.030.1 Composition of Suburban Multi-family Neighborhoods 16.20.030.2 Purpose
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Doors: Unknown
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationCorridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.060 - Corridor Residential Traditional Districts ( CRT ) Typical Buildings in the CRT District Sections: 16.20.060.1 Composition of Traditional Residential Corridors 16.20.060.2 Purpose and
More informationDRAFT IV. RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION
2. RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION Intent With historic homes and tree lined streets, Snohomish s historic neighborhoods are a critical component of the city s character, contributing to its desirable sense
More information100 SUNSET AVENUE. DHR RESOURCE NUMBER: Primary: Double/Duplex (non-contributing) DATE/PERIOD: Architectural Description
100 SUNSET AVENUE 100 Sunset Avenue DHR RESOURCE NUMBER: 104-5084-0216 Primary: Double/Duplex (non-contributing) DATE/PERIOD: 1965 Vernacular Site Description: This vernacular duplex is located along the
More informationGuidelines for New Construction in Albany s Residential Historic Districts & Neighborhoods
Guidelines for New Construction in Albany s Residential Historic Districts & Neighborhoods Examples of new construction that fit into the historic neighborhood. 1 Albany s historic residential neighborhoods
More informationRESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES - INFILL
Residential Infill INTRODUCTION University Park experienced three significant building booms at the end of the 19 th and beginning of the 20 th century. These resulted in the great wealth of historic houses
More informationProposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Final Draft Revised 08/29/2018
Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Final Draft Revised 08/29/2018 Drafting Notes: The 8/29/18 draft reflects the following changes from the 7/25/18 draft based on City Council and/or Planning Commission
More informationStandards for Single Family Detached Lots
Standards for Single Family Detached Lots 1. Single-Family Detached Lots are a minimum of 4,000 sf. 2. The following standards apply to all structures on Single-Family Detached Lots o Maximum Height to
More informationResidential and Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation
Residential and Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation Residential and Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation Statements of Intent of Zoning Ordinance YC-2 Subdistrict - - Residential This district comprises
More informationArchitectural Standards
Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant/Agent: Date: File # OFFICIAL USE RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Cohesive Design, Residential Standards (cdrs) R1.00 Promote visually
More informationArchitectural Standards
Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant/Agent: Date: File # OFFICIAL USE NON-RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Cohesive Design, Non-Residential Standards (cds) 1.00 Promote visually
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.020 - Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family Districts ( NS ) Sections: Typical Block in a Neighborhood Suburban District 16.20.020.1 History and Composition of Suburban Neighborhoods 16.20.020.2
More informationSouth Main Station. 150 Main Street, Longmont, Colorado 16" COMMON PARAPET DETAIL AREA. Date
NOTES: A primary objective of the building design is to continue the urban street character of Downtown Main Street and while still evoking the industrial character of the South Main area. This is achieved
More informationExterior Elevations and Materials
PAGE 01 1. Design Approval. Exterior elevations and related materials, finishes and colors shall be shown on plans submitted for approval by the DRC as part of Design Review or Modifications Review [as
More informationCorridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.060 - Corridor Residential Traditional District ( CRT ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CRT District Sections: 16.20.060.1 Composition of Traditional Residential Corridors 16.20.060.2 Purpose
More informationPlanning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development. Applicant: Kevin Bott
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Bott Garage Minor Construction 470-07-25 located at approximately 576 East South Temple Street in the South Temple Historic District September 5, 2007 Planning
More informationMULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA
MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA PURPOSE Applicability This section applies to all new multi family (including single family attached) development
More informationPROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT 2501 WEST HOMER STREET. Guardian Properties, LLC. September 9, 2015
PROPOSED PLAN DEVELOPMENT 2501 WEST HOMER STREET Guardian Properties, LLC September 9, 2015 2501 W Homer Zoning Map Scale: 1:080 Project Site 2501 W Homer Aerial Scale: 1:048 Project Site 2501 W Homer
More informationAPPENDIX A: CHARACTER-DEFINING FEATURES OF DENVER S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
APPENDIX A: CHARACTER-DEFINING FEATURES OF DENVER S HISTORIC DISTRICTS This appendix includes: Introduction... A-2»» Applying Character-defining Features... A-2»» Included & Excluded Districts... A-2»»
More informationCorridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.20.070 - Corridor Residential Suburban Districts ( CRS ) Sections: Typical Buildings in the CRS District 16.20.070.1 Composition of Suburban Residential Corridors 16.20.070.2 Purpose and Intent
More informationSECTION 8. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
SECTION 8. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 8.1 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS PURPOSE STATEMENTS 8.2 PERMITTED AND SPECIAL USES 8.3 BULK AND SETBACK REGULATIONS 8.4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 8.5 GENERAL
More information4) Garage placement must be in compliance with Sec. 6.3.G.2 below.
6.3 SMALL TOWN CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICT 6.3.1 Small Town Character Overlay District Article 6 / Overlay Districts A) Purpose The purpose and intent of the Small Town Character Overlay District is to
More informationCorridor Commercial Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.080 - Corridor Commercial Traditional District ( CCT ) CCT-1 Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CCT District CCT-2 Sections: 16.20.080.1 Composition of Corridor Commercial Traditional 16.20.080.2
More information30 Merrill Design Revisions 2 messages
10/19/2016 City of Portland Mail 30 Merrill Design Revisions Helen Donaldson 30 Merrill Design Revisions 2 messages Evan Carroll Bild Architecture Tue,
More informationArchitectural Design The design of new buildings is intended to be referential to existing traditional buildings in Lititz Borough.
Architectural Design Traditional Architecture along Main Street Traditional Architecture along Main Street Traditional Architecture along Main Street Traditional Architecture along Broad Street 20.144
More informationStaff Review Date: June 8, 2016 HDC PID#
Charlotte Historic District Commission Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness Staff Review Date: June 8, 2016 HDC 2016-113 PID# 07102148 LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUMMARY OF
More informationPottstown Historic Districts Maintenance and Renovation Guidelines
Maintenance and Permits Historic Districts established to protect Pottstown s assets Pottstown Council has established two historic districts to protect the Borough s oldest and most historic buildings.
More informationArchitectural Standards
Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Applicant/Agent: Date: File # OFFICIAL USE RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS MULTI-FAMILY Cohesive Design, Residential Standards (cdrs) R1.00 Promote visually aesthetic building
More informationFAÇADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS
FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS Architecture and Building Conditions in the Bellevue-Rutherford Neighborhood The architecture of the Bellevue-Rutherford neighborhood varies in style
More informationTHE RIVER DISTRICT Nominations of Landmarks and the North 16 th Street Historic District
THE RIVER DISTRICT Nominations of Landmarks and the North 16 th Street Historic District Preservation Commission November 3, 2010 Pipeworks Complex, 116 North 16 th Street Character Defining Features:
More informationCity of Easton, Pennsylvania HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
City of Easton, Pennsylvania HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION GUIDELINES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AND ADDITIONS This brochure, published by the City of Easton Historic District Commission, contains guidelines
More information(d) Metal buildings used for industrial uses are not exempt from additional landscape standards as required in Section (e).
5.22. Non-Residential and Multifamily Design Standards. 5.22-1 Applicability of Non-Residential Design Standards. All non-residential and multifamily buildings, with the exception of those described in
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Excerpted from Design Guidelines for Denver Landmark Structures and Districts, January 2016
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationWith Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation
MESA COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS HANDBOOK With Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation November 14, 2011 1 INDEX A. Purpose... 1 B. Applicability... 1 C. Design Standards... 2 1. Site
More informationCity of Aurora, Ohio. Architectural Board of Review. Residential Guidelines
City of Aurora, Ohio Architectural Board of Review Residential Guidelines The Architectural Board of Review (ABR) is guided by a set of general goals outlined by the City of Aurora that address certain
More informationFINAL DRAFT. Buildings Fort Monroe. resource inventory FORT MONROE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN STANDARDS RESOURCE INVENTORY 4C.
Buildings 151 209 4C Fort Monroe resource inventory FORT MONROE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN STANDARDS RESOURCE INVENTORY 4C.231 FAMILY HOUSING NCO DATE OF CONSTRUCTION 1911 ARCHITECTURAL STYLE Colonial
More informationE Main Street June 14, 2010 Landmarks Commission Meeting
Madison Landmarks Commission First Settlement Historic District Criteria for the review of new construction Address: Date: Form Prepared By: 517-523 E Main Street June 14, 2010 Landmarks Commission Meeting
More informationAccepted Architectural Styles 1. Classical Revival 2. French 3. Texas Regional Vernacular 4. Tudor 5. Mediterranean 6. Modern Classical Revival Classical Revival design seeks to emulate elements of Ancient
More informationARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CHECKLIST ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE MODEL
9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 CITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CHECKLIST 303-538-7295 Single-Family Detached and Single-Family Attached Homes developmentsubmittals@cityofthornton.net
More informationARCHITECTURAL SUGGESTED DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PEGASUS AIRPARK
ARCHITECTURAL SUGGESTED DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PEGASUS AIRPARK ARCHITECTURAL INTENT The challenge is to add elements of architectural richness and variety without exceeding budget parameters. Great neighborhoods
More informationROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 1. WORKSESSION TOPICS
Design Review & Historic Preservation Board Meeting Agenda Puyallup City Hall - Room 504 333 South Meridian, Puyallup 98371 Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:00 PM ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 1. WORKSESSION
More informationCorridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.070 - Corridor Residential Suburban District ( CRS ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the CRS District Sections: 16.20.070.1 Composition of Suburban Residential Corridors 16.20.070.2 Purpose
More informationSingle Family District
Alley Single Family District R1 4.01 Intent: The R1 Single Family District is established to protect, promote and maintain the development of single family dwellings, as well as provide for limited public
More informationReginald Armistice Hawkins House 1703 Madison Avenue, Charlotte, NC
Reginald Armistice Hawkins House 1703 Madison Avenue, Charlotte, NC The 1954 Reginald Armistice Hawkins House faces roughly north and occupies a relatively flat, approximately.4-acre corner lot at the
More informationCOVERED BRIDGE AT HARDIN VALLEY
ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES FOR COVERED BRIDGE AT HARDIN VALLEY - UNIT 1 - In an effort to establish and preserve a harmonious design within the Covered Bridge Community, the following guidelines are established.
More informationKEEGO HARBOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CHECKLIST
KEEGO HARBOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CHECKLIST Date/Revision Date of Site Plan Times Reviewed Project Name/Location Reviewed By Date Application Number/Community Applicant/Designer Telephone Number - Applicant
More informationCITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA
CITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES SUB AREA 3 PURPOSE Architectural Review by its nature is a creative and largely subjective process. These Guidelines are intended to allow
More informationMASONRY, ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND BUILDING STANDARDS
MASONRY, ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND BUILDING STANDARDS 4.5500 RESERVED 4.5501 MASONRY STANDARDS FOR CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) a) All buildings and structures shall be of exterior fire resistant construction,
More informationOverlay Design Guidelines. Prairie Village Overlay Design Guidelines
Prairie Village Draft Document April 2015 1 Table of Contents Introduction from the Overlay Design Committee... 3 Purpose of the Overlay Design Guideline... 5 Review Procedure Fundamentals... 6 PV/Overlay
More informationBUILDING DESIGN IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R6).
1276.23 BUILDING DESIGN IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R6). Each dwelling, manufactured home or principal building in a Residential District (R6) shall be designed to meet the following criteria: (a) Its minimum
More informationNeighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.020 Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District ( NS ) Figure REFRENCE Typical Houses in Neighborhood Suburban 1 Figure REFRENCE Typical Block in a Neighborhood Suburban District Sections: 16.20.020.1
More informationDESIGN STANDARDS & GUIDELINES for THE EMILY GRIFFITH OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL WELTON STREET and 1261 GLENARM PLACE
DESIGN STANDARDS & GUIDELINES for THE EMILY GRIFFITH OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL 1250 WELTON STREET and 1261 GLENARM PLACE Adopted by Denver City Council May 2016 INTRODUCTION 1. View of the Emily Griffith Opportunity
More informationCITY OF WINTER PARK SETBACK/COVERAGE WORKSHEET GUIDE FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING
CITY OF WINTER PARK SETBACK/COVERAGE WORKSHEET GUIDE FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING See Setback/Coverage Worksheet & Criteria: Pages 1-4 & Accessory Structure Guide Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6
More informationCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490; Albany, OR 97321 STAFF REPORT Historic Review of New Construction HEARING BODY LANDMARKS ADVISORY COMMISSION HEARING DATE Wednesday,
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Arrow B Architecture. Project Scope Under Review: Façade rehabilitation and restoration
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 201 West Colfax, Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2709 f: 720.865.3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF This document is the
More informationCALIFORNIA ST ROWHOMES
CALIFORNIASTREETROWHOMES 2844-2854 CALIFORNIA ST, DENVER, COLORADO 80205 LANDMARKPRESERVATIONCOMMISSION INFILLPART:MASS,FORM&CONTEXTREVIEW THEPROJECTSUBMITTALISFORASIXUNITROWHOMEPROJECTTOBECONSTRUCTEDONTHECURRENTLYVACANTSITETHATISCOMPRISEDOF2844AND2848CALIFORNIASTINTHECURTISPARKHISTORICDISTRICT.
More informationTHE MASS AND SCALE OF NEW HOMES PROTECTING THE CHARACTER OF HADDONFIELD NEIGHBORHOODS
THE MASS AND SCALE OF NEW HOMES PROTECTING THE CHARACTER OF HADDONFIELD NEIGHBORHOODS THE QUESTIONS 1. DO SOME (NOT ALL) OF THE MORE RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED HOMES COMPLEMENT OR DETRACT FROM THE CHARACTER
More informationRNC Residential Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District
Sec. 125-81 RNC Residential Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Sections: 125-81.A. 125-81.B. 125-81.C 125-81.D. 125-81.E. 125-81.F. 125-81.G 12-81.H 12-81.I urposes Zoning Map Designator Applicability
More informationDenver, CO Primary external wall material Synthetics / Vinyl
OAHP1403 Rev. 9/98 COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Official Eligibility Determination (OAHP use only) Date Initials Determined Eligible - National Register Architectural Inventory Form Determined Not
More informationThe developer / builder desires to follow the Design Guidelines and Design Features as listed below in lieu of the Basic Standards.
Section 2. Single Family and Two Family Guidelines. A. Basic Standard. The developer / builder desires to follow the Design Guidelines and Design Features as listed below in lieu of the Basic Standards.
More information524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study
Attachment D 524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study Prepared for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City November 2015 Prepared by VODA Landscape + Planning www.vodaplan.com TABLE OF
More informationThe NWX Prairie Style
zontal proportions and a kinship with the earth. All Prairie style homes reflect Wright s obsession with breaking up the box. Historically, single level prairie style homes were uncommon. Single level
More informationResource: Contributing Resource Report Date: 10/3/2018 Capitol View Park Historic District
I.F MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Address: 3120 Lee St., Silver Spring Meeting Date: 10/10/2018 Resource: Contributing Resource Report Date: 10/3/2018 Capitol View Park
More informationProject Location: 384 Railroad Avenue, Pittsburg, CA. APN:
MEMORANDUM Date: 5 January 2010 To: From: Project: Re: Via: Alexandra Endress Associate Planner City of Pittsburg Sheila McElroy Mecca Block Phase II Crosby Building: design compatibility E-mail Project
More informationDESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT (HD1)
Kingston Historic District Commission Kingston, New Hampshire DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT (HD1) Adopted November, 2008 Kingston HDI Design Guidelines November 2008 Page 1 KINGSTON
More informationDESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING Multi family housing is an increasingly popular form of infill development in Shaker Heights because of the city s built out
More informationStaff Review Date: June 8, 2016 HDC PID#
Charlotte Historic District Commission Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness Staff Review Date: June 8, 2016 HDC 2016-063 PID# 12109326 LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUMMARY OF
More informationStaff Review Date: February 14, 2018 HDC PID#
Charlotte Historic District Commission Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness Staff Review Date: February 14, 2018 HDC 2017-682 PID# 07103504 LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUMMARY
More informationBUILDING TYPES: SINGLE FAMILY: DETACHED INTRODUCTION GUIDELINES & OBJECTIVES DEFINITIONS LOT TYPES SITE CRITERIA ARCHITECTURAL REGULATIONS SITE
BUILDING TYPES: SINGLE FAMILY: DETACHED PAGE 21 MASS AND SCALE: ON SLOPED S, STEP THE STRUCTURES WITH THE NATURAL TERRAIN Design upper fl oors with smaller fl oor area and lower fl oors to be near grade.
More informationArticle 13. Design Standards
Article 13. Design Standards 13.1 RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT GENERAL BUILDING DESIGN 13.2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT GENERAL BUILDING DESIGN 13.3 RESIDENTIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2013 17 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL CREATING TITLE 17.21 OF THE SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF
More information2. House Designs. SAL Review
2. House Designs 1 Roof has a minimum of 6:12 pitch 2 Minimum roof overhang is 2 feet 3 Roof design must incorporate dormers or gables to the 4 Long slopes of unbroken roof line will not be accepted 5
More informationBUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS
BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS TOPEKA NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS APPROVED BY TOPEKA PLANNING COMMISSION 12/17/2018 APPROVED BY GOVERNING BODY 1/8/2019 Topeka Non-Residential Design Standards Section 1 (18.275.010)
More informationHoldener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE
Holdener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE As approved by City Council June 24, 2002 City of Enumclaw Holdener Farm Area PUD Design Guidelines Phase One TABLE OF CONTENTS
More information