Comment Letter No. 4 California Department of Fish and Wildlife March 29, 2016
|
|
- Thomasine Berry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Comment Letter No. 4 California Department of Fish and Wildlife March 29, This comment provides a general description of the proposed NCOS Restoration Project and an introduction to comments provided below. No response is necessary Table is part of the MND s Project Description and it is not the purpose of the Project Description to describe existing environmental conditions at the project site. MND Section (Biological Resources Setting) provides a comprehensive description of the existing plant/habitat communities on the project site, and Figure (Project Site Habitat Types) depicts the location of on-site plant communities The Total Acres with Project column of Table only depicts habitat areas that would be created by the Project, and only 106 of the 136-acre project site would be disturbed by proposed grading activities for the purpose of creating restored wetland and upland habitat. Of the 106 acres that would be graded to accommodate proposed restoration activities, 39.5 acres are on the South Parcel, and 65.5 acres are on the former golf course and Whittier parcels. Weeding will be the main activities conducted on the undisturbed 30-acre portion of the project site (27.3 acres on the South Parcel and 2.2 acres on the Whittier parcel). Existing habitat on the South Parcel will not be entirely removed as indicated by this comment. Habitat types to be preserved on the South Parcel include: coastal sage scrub affiliates (3.53 ac); annual grass and herbs (12.33 ac); taller weeds (17.65 ac); perennial native grass (0.89 ac); bare ground (1.72 ac); trees (1.11 ac); non-native turf grass (0.11 ac); and the existing eucalyptus woodland The MND did evaluate the potential for proposed construction-related activities to impact on-site wildlife species that may be located in annual grassland. Section 5.4.2d states, in part: Project-related construction operations could temporarily reduce wildlife movement that does occur through the project site, however, construction would be conducted in phases, which would minimize the potential for short-term wildlife movement impacts. The proposed long-term habitat enhancements would increase habitat value and provide forage and cover that would enhance the potential for wildlife movement through the site. Since the removal of annual grassland from the South Parcel would not result in significant impacts to any known sensitive plant or animal species or their habitats (see MND Sections 5.4.2a and 5.4.2c) impacts to on-site species were considered to be short-term and less than significant, and no mitigation measures were required. In addition, as described in Response 4.3 above a substantial area (27.3 acres) of existing habitat would be preserved on the South Parcel, and that area would be enhanced by proposed weeding activities.
2 Page 2 In regard to wildlife species on the project site that birds may feed on, on-site wildlife resources are being assessed through a variety of on-going and previously completed studies including: an invertebrate study that is on-going; a winter and spring raptor and breeding bird survey that builds on two years ( ) of previous bird surveys conducted on the project site; and a cover board survey that found very few organisms other than western fence lizards and argentine ants. For the cover board study (8/31/2012 9/1/ 2014) 26 cover boards were opened every other week over a two year period, resulting in 1,351 observations. The cover board study found that in 19% of observations (256 observation events) invasive argentine ants were found. 11% of time western fence lizards and 10% of the time juvenile western fence lizards were found. 4% of the time skink were observed, followed by silverfish (3.7%), pill bug (3%), spider (2.7%), centipede (2.6%), black beetle (2.4%), field cricket (2.23%), Jerusalem cricket (1.3%), slender salamander (1.6% - which is approximately 10 board flips out of the 1,350 done), alligator lizard (0.74%), cricket (0.59%), field mouse (0.59%). Observations of vole, ringneck snake, gopher snake and deer mouse were all less than 0.3%, or 4 observations or less over the 2 year study. The conclusion of the cover board study is that the project site does support some native wildlife, but at very low density Please refer to response 4-4 above regarding construction-related loss of foraging habitat. As indicated by that response, the Project would result in long-term habitat enhancements that would increase habitat value that would enhance the potential for wildlife foraging on the project site, and 27.3 acres of existing habitat would be preserved on the South Parcel. Therefore, the project would have a beneficial long-term cumulative impact related to raptor foraging. Based on the results of the cover board surveys described in Response 4-4 above, it does not appear the project would result in a substantial loss of vole habitat. In addition, there is more evidence for vole use in the remnant portion of native grassland on the Ellwood Mesa, west of the project site, which is being used as a reference site for the proposed Project. Further, CCBER has proposed (Stratton, April 16, 2016) to enhance portions of the project site for smaller organisms through constructing hybernaculums, which CCBER has been constructing on North Parcel by digging holes and filling them with a variety of rock and tile material to create holes and crevices for holding water, providing cover and multiple small entry/exit points with temperature control provided by soil cover over the feature. These features, along with the presence of more than 500 acres of open space adjacent that the project site to the west and south, will act as a refugia and a source for recolonization of the project site by species such as voles, mice and reptiles Section (Biological Resources Setting) provides the following description of previous field surveys that have been conducted on the project site:
3 Page 3 The biological resources setting has been established by Sage Institute, Inc. (SII) biologist/ecologist field surveys conducted in the fall and winter including a formal jurisdictional wetland delineation study, to document existing conditions and ground truth available background information from academic and professional studies conducted over the project site for UCSB as far back as Many detailed studies have been conducted over the project site as a part of UCSB academic research and for development under the LRDP. Studies included special-status plant and wildlife species surveys, wetland delineation mapping, general plant community and habitat mapping, and bird surveys conducted throughout the year (nesting, foraging, migrating, etc.). The biological resources analysis described below represents the accumulated data from the copious plant and wildlife resources studies based on existing conditions from current field surveys. 4-7 In addition to the extensive field study efforts that have been completed, CCBER is conducting special status plant surveys on the project site this spring that follow CDFW protocols, and that build on a 2013 Keeler-Wolf study of habitat on South Parcel that was completed using modified habitat associations. The first of the three spring surveys for special status plants found only 1 species, Lonicera subspicata var. subspicata represented by a small number of plants in a proposed disturbance area, and more plants in areas that are to be preserved. CCBER has extensive experience growing and establishing populations of this plant. No seedlings of Centromadia parryi var australis have been found yet, although it is early in the year for this plant. This species is not common on the project site, however, CCBER has been working with this species for 8 years and successfully established populations on several sites on the UCSB Campus, including the San Clemente housing project and on the North Parcel. Any project-related disturbances to these or other sensitive plants located on the project site would be reduced to a less than significant level through compliance with UCSB Long Range Development Plan Policy ESH-30, which requires: New development shall avoid all special-status plant species, including Southern tarplant, to the greatest extent feasible. This policy applies to isolated individual plants that do not meet the definition of ESHA. Special-status species that are ESHA shall be afforded full protection under the ESHA provisions of the LRDP. Where the individual(s) do not meet the definition of ESHA and cannot be feasibly avoided, then it may be relocated provided that the impact to individual species shall be fully mitigated. As requested by this comment, CCBER will provide the Tarplant Restoration Plan required by mitigation measure BIO-1a to CDFW for review MND Section 5.4.2c evaluates potential project-related wetland habitat impacts to sensitive species, and states in part:
4 Page 4 Temporary construction-related actions such as tree removals, dewatering of creeks and drainages, excavation, and fill activities in waters of the U.S./State have the potential to result in the take (kill, harm, harass) of tidewater goby, western pond turtle, California red-legged frog (should it occur), and nesting birds including raptors. The tidewater goby can inhabit the on-site drainages and cannot survive outside of water and would need to be salvaged and relocated as part of the project implementation. The California red-legged frog and western pond turtle can survive out of water but would also need to be relocated to suitable habitat nearby during construction. Loss of habitat, capture and other take of a federally listed and other special-status wildlife species, and take of an active bird s nest including nest failure, would be a significant impact. This potentially significant but mitigable impact would be reduced to a less than significant level by implementing mitigation measures BIO-2a, BIO-2b, BIO-2c, BIO-3a, BIO-3b, BIO-4a and BIO-4b. In addition, the analysis also evaluated the potential for the project to result in long-term impacts to sensitive and common species associated with on-site wetland habitat and concluded: The Project would restore and return the highly modified former golf course and borrow areas to a mosaic of pre-disturbance conditions that provide tidally influenced habitats and surrounding uplands restored with native plants. For both special-status and common wildlife species, this would be an overall long-term beneficial impact as the habitat for the special-status species that currently exists on the project site would be substantially enhanced. Please also refer to Responses 4-4, 4-5 and 4-6 above regarding project-related impacts to common wildlife species on the project site, the project s long-term cumulative impacts, and previous and on-going surveys conducted on the project site The three sycamore trees located on the project site are dispersed throughout the site, with one tree located near the southern segment of Devereux Creek, one tree near the western segment of the Creek, and one tree located near the tributary on the eastern portion of the site. The two oak trees are located along the southern segment of Devereux Creek. Areas that support willows are located on the eastern portion of the South Parcel and are to be retained. In regard to salvaging both live and dead trees on the project site, MND Section (Project Implementation) states: Prior to grading operations with a specified area the surface vegetation would be removed. Native vegetation would be salvaged to the extent possible. Herbaceous vegetation that is removed may be buried on the project site, and woody vegetation would be transported off-site. Except in situations where public safety or flood protection concerns prohibit, dead or dying trees may be retained in place as they serve important habitat functions in providing nesting and breeding habitat areas for wildlife. (emphasis added).
5 Page 5 In addition, trunks and big branches of large removed trees would be retained on-site and used to provide vertical and horizontal habitat elements such as perches, cover, habitat, graineries, and cavities (Stratton, April 21, 2016). In regard to tree removals from the project site and replanting requirements, it should be noted that more than 100 oak trees are being planted and another 100 have already been planted on Coal Oil Point Reserve adjacent to the project site. These trees will grow to support white-tailed kites and other raptors and song birds, which will be able to forage on the project site from an excellent vantage point. If soils are suitable on the north side of South Parcel, oaks will be planted there also. In addition, the proposed widening of the small ditch creek on the Whittier parcel will greatly enhance that habitat, and the area adjacent to the drainage would be planted with more than 40 riparian trees including willow, sycamore, cottonwood, alder and oaks (Stratton, April 16, 2016). The additional trees will substantially increase the habitat value of this area as the existing channel supports only a few willows. It should also be noted that the previous widening of Phelps creek north of the project site, which occurred in conjunction with the development of the UCSB Ocean Walk housing project, greatly expanded that riparian corridor and that area now includes oaks, cottonwoods and sycamore that are becoming well established. In regard to the potential for the project to adversely affect bats that use on-site trees, there is no record of sensitive bat species being observed on the project site. However, CCBER will consult with CDFW prior to conducting on-site bat surveys in conjunction with required pre-construction bird nest surveys required by MND mitigation measures BIO- 2a, 2b and 2c As described by responses 4-4 and 4-5 above, the MND determined that project-related grading and grubbing impacts such as those described by this comment would be less than significant. However, CCBER will continue to work with the CDFW to address the Department s concerns in conjunction with the preparation of a project-specific Habitat Restoration and Monitoring Plan. MND Section (Maintenance) provides the following description of the Habitat Restoration and Monitoring Plan: A Habitat Restoration and Monitoring Plan to be prepared for the Project will include monitoring and adaptive management measures, and would be completed as part of final project design. The Plan would also include requirements specified by the Project s environmental review, conditions required by the Project s permitting and or grant funding agencies, and project-specific monitoring protocols and project performance/success criteria. On-going monitoring would be performed to evaluate vegetation establishment, wildlife utilization, physical processes, and site conditions related to potential development of hazards such as slope stability and flood capacity. The monitoring plan would include the following elements:
6 Page 6 Recording of as-built conditions Establishment of permanent monitoring stations (e.g. cross-sections, photo points, transects) Monitoring schedule Monitoring protocols (standardized for consistency in data collection and documentation) Reporting requirements Success criteria Corrective /adaptive management measures or process In addition, CCBER will implement mitigation measures and conditions of approval that may be included in the Streambed Alteration Agreement issued for the project as required by MND mitigation measure BIO-4b The proposed western snowy plover habitat would have characteristics that are very similar to the existing plover area located in the vicinity of the Devereux Slough, which is currently used by snowy plovers as a nesting site Please refer to response Please refer to response As requested by this comment, CCBER will provide the salvage and relocation plans for tidewater goby, California red-legged frog, and western pond turtle to CDFW for review The MND provides an analysis of the Project s consistency with applicable policies of the UCSB 2010 Long Range Development Plan (LRDP). LRDP Policy ESH-05 requires that: Nature trails, intended for the passive enjoyment of the open space/esha resource, shall be restricted to pedestrian use and sited to afford the user an experience of the resource, provided that such trails are designed to protect the resource. As indicated by the MND s analysis that is provided below, the Project would be consistent with the requirements of LRDP Policy ESH-05, which would minimize the potential for the proposed secondary and tertiary trails to result in impacts to on-site habitat. The Project has proposed to develop several types of trails on the project site. The proposed primary trail would be a multi-use (pedestrian and bicycles) trail that would provide nature viewing as well as a circulation connection between residences adjacent to the project site to the north and east and Storke Road. The proposed secondary and tertiary trails would be located on the South Parcel and are intended to be used primarily by pedestrians and to allow users the opportunity to experience the natural character of the restored project areas (refer to trail descriptions provided on IS/MND Figure 2.6-2). Should on-going monitoring of the project site indicate that indirect impacts to a sensitive habitat area is occurring, methods that would be implemented to minimize those effects
7 Page 7 may include but are not limited to the installation of additional landscape barriers, post and cable and/or split rail fencing, or other similar barriers that do not interfere with animal movement. It is possible that bicycles and off-leash dogs will be prohibited on trails that are to be constructed on the South Parcel. All trails on the project site will be designed to not erode or pond water As described in response 4-8 above, the MND has evaluated project-related impacts to wetland habitat and impacts to aquatic species. The analysis provided by the MND indicates that the project would have the potential to result in significant impacts, however, those impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of identified mitigation measures. CCBER will continue to work with the CDFW to implement mitigation measures and conditions of approval that may be included in the Streambed Alteration Agreement issued for the project as required by MND mitigation measure BIO-4b.
Conserving California s Wildlife Since 1870
State of California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE South Coast Region 3883 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 467-4201 www.wildlife.ca.gov EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CHARLTON
More informationSanta Barbara Audubon Society
1 Santa Barbara Audubon Society A Chapter of the National Audubon Society P.O. Box 5508 Santa Barbara, CA 93150 www.santabarbaraaudubon.org Shari Hammond shari.hammond@planning.ucsb.edu March 28, 2016
More information3.6 Riparian Ecosystem Wildlife
3.6 Riparian Ecosystem Wildlife 3.6.1 Introduction and Methodology Riparian areas and associated wetlands are widely recognized for the significant and diverse roles they play in the landscape. They clean
More informationA. Planning Background.
Certification of the Final EIR, Findings and Approvals for the Faculty and Family Student Housing, Open Space Plan, and for Amendment of the Long Range Development Plan, Santa Barbara Campus I. CERTIFICATION
More informationChapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation
Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation Introduction and Setting Nevada County contains an extremely wide range of plants, animals and habitat types. With topographic elevations ranging from 300 feet in the
More informationGENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA. March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION
GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION This document is intended to provide general guidance for use in conducting
More informationSECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION
SECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION 10-1 INTENT AND PURPOSE A. Intent 1. The City finds that wetlands serve a variety of beneficial functions. Wetlands maintain water quality, reduce flooding and erosion,
More informationFINAL FOCUSED TIERED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT D IGITAL A RTS F ACILITY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ
FINAL FOCUSED TIERED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT D IGITAL A RTS F ACILITY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ S EPTEMBER 2005 State Clearinghouse # 2005022004 SECTION 2.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
More informationCounty of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report
County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report Agenda Item Number: 55 (This Section for use by Clerk of the Board Only.) Clerk of the Board 575 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95403 To: Board of Supervisors
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT. University of California Santa Barbara North Campus Open Space (NCOS) Restoration Project
PUBLIC NOTICE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LOS ANGELES DISTRICT BUILDING STRONG APPLICATION FOR PERMIT University of California Santa Barbara North Campus Open Space (NCOS) Restoration Project Public Notice/Application
More informationAppendix F. Response to Comments. North Coast System Rehabilitation Project 9/22/14 Phase 3 Coast Segment Draft Initial Study
Appendix F This page intentionally left blank APPENDIX F RESPONSES TO COMMENTS In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073, the Initial Study/Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the
More informationImpact BIO-48: Periodic Effects of Inundation of California Tiger Salamander Habitat as a Result of Implementation of Alternative 4A
0 0 0 0 CEQA Conclusion: Indirect effects resulting from project operations and maintenance as well as construction-related noise and visual disturbances could impact California tiger salamander in aquatic
More information5.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND WETLANDS
5.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND WETLANDS 5.2.1 INTRODUCTION This section discusses potential adverse effects to vegetation communities and special status species. Effects would be considered adverse if the
More information4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN
4.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO-1 OC Services/ Planning (s) Required BIO-1: Wildlife Pre- Construction Surveys and Biological Monitoring: Prior to ground disturbance or vegetation clearing within the Project
More informationWildlife Management Intensity Standards
Habitat Control Practices Required Intensity Description Grazing Management The planned manipulation of livestock numbers and grazing intensities to increase food, The planned manipulation of livestock
More informationWildlife Management Planning Guidelines for the South Texas Plains Ecoregion
Habitat Control Practices Required Intensity Description Grazing Management Prescribed Burning Range Enhancement (Range Reseeding) Brush Management Riparian Management and Enhancement Wetland Enhancement
More informationChapter 10 Natural Environment
Chapter 10 Natural Environment Existing Conditions The Natural Environment Element addresses the protection, conservation, preservation, and restoration of the natural resources the Bayview Ridge Subarea,
More informationShort-term (Construction) Impacts and Potential Mitigation
4 Short-term (Construction) Impacts and Potential Mitigation CHAPTER 4. SHORT-TERM (CONSTRUCTION) IMPACTS AND POTENTIAL MITIGATION This chapter describes short-term (construction) impacts that could result
More informationVEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES POLICIES
VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES POLICIES The County will: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1.1 Conserve, Enhance, Protect, Maintain and Manage Vegetative, Water, Fish and Wildlife Resources Promote
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 BACKGROUND ES.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 BACKGROUND The purpose of this Draft Environmental Report (DEIR) is the implementation of improvement projects at Charles M. Schulz Sonoma County Airport (the Airport). The improvement
More informationSR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 / WSDOT Stream Buffer Mitigation (Agreement Y-9403) 2012 Final Monitoring Report
2012 SR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 / WSDOT Stream Buffer Mitigation (Agreement Y-9403) 2012 Final Monitoring Report SR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 (MP 31.95 to
More informationCarmel River Reroute & San Clemente Dam Removal Project (PLN110373) Monterey County Planning Commission Workshop July 25, 2012
Carmel River Reroute & San Clemente Dam Removal Project (PLN110373) Monterey County Planning Commission Workshop July 25, 2012 URS1 Workshop Agenda 1. Background 2. Project Overview 3. Tree Removals/Mitigation
More informationBiotic Resources Group
Biotic Resources Group Biotic Assessments Resource Management Permitting Proposed Offsite Trail Connection Within Caltrans Right-of-Way Biological Review May 2013 The Biotic Resources Group conducted a
More informationLogan River at Rendezvous Park, Channel and Floodplain Restoration: Crack Willow (Salix fragilis) Issues and Management Strategies
Logan River at Rendezvous Park, Channel and Floodplain Restoration: Crack Willow (Salix fragilis) Issues and Management Strategies Prepared May 2, 2017 by Darren Olsen, BIO-WEST, Inc. Issues Crack willow
More informationFitzgerald Marine Reserve Pilot Projects. Upland Vegetation Restoration in San Vicente Creek and the Monterey Cypress Grove
Fitzgerald Marine Reserve Pilot Projects Upland Vegetation Restoration in San Vicente Creek and the Monterey Cypress Grove Public Meeting Objectives Restoration Plan Goals for each project San Vicente
More informationCOUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: April 23, 2014 TO: FROM: Planning Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Consideration of a Coastal Development Permit for the
More informationAppendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas
Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas This document should be read in conjunction with the CRCA Planning Policy. 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to summarize the recommendations
More informationBiological Resources and Development Permitting
Public Information County of Ventura Resource Management Agency Planning Division 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, CA 93009 805 654-2488 www.vcrma.org/divisions/planning Biological Resources and Development
More informationCalifornia Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region. Tentative Order No. R XXXX
California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Amending Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. R2-2008-0078 for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish
More informationRiparian Vegetation Protections. Heritage Tree Protection
PLACER Protections in place: Oak Tree Retention/ Replacement Requirements General Plan Language Specific Voluntary Rural Design require preservation of native trees and groves through replacement and dedication
More informationCOASTAL CONSERVANCY. December 2, 2004 SAN DIEGO NCCP PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: MONTE VISTA RANCH. File No Project Manager: Marc Beyeler
COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation December 2, 2004 SAN DIEGO NCCP PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: MONTE VISTA RANCH File No. 03-137 Project Manager: Marc Beyeler RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse
More informationLOWER DRUM PLANNING UNIT Yuba-Bear River Watershed
Existing Conditions & Uses Overview Provides open space and recreation opportunities within the Sierra Nevada foothills 1,098 acres in Placer and Nevada Counties 789 acres outside the FERC boundary; 309
More informationManaging near Vernal Pools using Good Forestry in the Granite State
Managing near Vernal Pools using Good Forestry in the Granite State Matt Tarr Associate Extension Professor Wildlife Specialist University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension NESAF Conference March
More informationSanta Ana Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project Design Criteria
Santa Ana Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project Design Criteria Front Country Ranger District, San Bernardino National Forest San Bernardino County, California September 16, 2010 DESIGN CRITERIA Various measures
More informationMITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION & MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF CHICO PLANNING DIVISION
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION & MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CITY OF CHICO PLANNING DIVISION Based upon the analysis and findings contained within the attached initial study, a mitigated negative declaration
More informationIn 2013, Gunnison sage-grouse was proposed for an "endangered" listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act.
Gunnison County, CO Community Development Department 221 N. Wisconsin St. Ste. D Gunnison, CO 81230 (970) 641-0360 Website: www.gunnisoncounty.org Email: planning@gunnisoncounty.org Information Sheet:
More informationResponses to Comments from State Agencies
Summary of Comment Letters Received from State Agencies This section provides responses to comments received on the draft environmental document from state agencies. Comment Code Agency S-1 California
More informationAppendix E Habitat Vulnerability Summary Sheets
Habitat Vulnerability Summary Sheets Table of Contents Item No. Title Page Table SH-1 Freshwater Marsh / Willow Woodland Habitat Summary 2 Figure SH-1 Freshwater Marsh 2100 SLAMM Results Without Tide Gate
More informationMANZANITA LAKE PLANNING UNIT Willow Creek Watershed
Existing Conditions & Uses Overview Area surrounding a small afterbay and creeks with ethnobotanical resources and valuable habitat 472 acres in Madera County; 337 acres outside the FERC boundary and 135
More informationUniversity of Florida Conservation Area Land Management Plan Bat House Woods
University of Florida Conservation Area Land Management Plan Bat House Woods Introduction Bat House Woods is the unofficial name for the 8.5 acre wooded area adjacent to Physical Plant greenhouses and
More informationMonitoring Report #3 Kenston Lake Stream Restoration Bainbridge, Ohio
Monitoring Report #3 Kenston Lake Stream Restoration Bainbridge, Ohio Prepared by: EnviroScience, Inc. 5070 Stow Rd Stow OH 44224 (330) 688-0111 Year Ending: December 31, 2013 I. Project Overview The following
More informationAPPENDIX E AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION PROTOCOL FOR VERNAL POOLS
APPENDIX E AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION PROTOCOL FOR VERNAL POOLS August 2013 Avoidance and Minimization Protocol August 2013 For s Note: This page intentionally left blank Avoidance and Minimization Protocol
More informationAmphibian Protection Strategies. Presented by: Linda Dupuis, M.Sc., R.P.Bio Wildlife Habitat Ecologist
Amphibian Protection Strategies Presented by: Linda Dupuis, M.Sc., R.P.Bio Wildlife Habitat Ecologist Vulnerability Biphase life histories and physiological limitations make aquatic-breeding amphibians
More informationAPPENDIX K LRDP EIR ADDENDUM #2
APPENDIX K LRDP EIR ADDENDUM #2 U C S B OFFICE OF CAMPUS PLANNING & DESIGN University of California Santa Barbara August 2015 Addendum #2 Environmental Impact Report SCH#2007051128 UC Santa Barbara Long
More informationAPPENDIX A CEQA Initial Study Checklist
APPENDIX A CEQA Initial Study Checklist Final San Pasqual Undergrounding Project Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration City# ENV 15-0016 / SCH# 2016084001 Prepared for: City of Escondido Vista
More informationENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP AND THE 2020 PROJECT
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING UPDATE ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP AND THE 2020 PROJECT Physical and Environmental Planning University of California, Merced 5200 N. Lake Road Merced,
More informationGolf Course and Recreational Facilities Best Management Guidelines. Regional Official Plan Guidelines
Golf Course and Recreational Facilities Best Management Guidelines Regional Official Plan Guidelines Halton Region Official Plan Guidelines The Regional Official Plan (ROP) is Halton s guiding document
More information[FWS R8 ES 2017 N107; FXES FF08ECAR00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Incidental Take Permit
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/01/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-25889, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4333 15 DEPARTMENT OF THE
More informationAVALONIA LAND CONSERVANCY FEE LAND STEWARDSHIP PRINCIPLES
AVALONIA LAND CONSERVANCY FEE LAND STEWARDSHIP PRINCIPLES This document has been prepared for guidance in developing Property Management Plans for individual properties Avalonia owns in fee. It sets forth
More informationPART 4 GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS
Goleta Slough Area Sea Level Rise and Management Plan Goals, Policies and Actions PART 4 GOALS, POLICIES AND ACTIONS 4.1 1997 GSEMP Goals, Policies and Actions The 1997 Goleta Slough Ecosystem Management
More informationWhat is an ecosystem?
What is an ecosystem? An ecosystem is generally defined as a community of organisms living in a particular environment and the physical elements in that environment with which they interact. (http://www.enviroliteracy.org/category.php/3.html)
More informationDRAFT (July 2018) Butte County Oak Woodland Mitigation Ordinance
DRAFT (July 2018) Butte County Oak Woodland Mitigation Ordinance Contents XX 1 XX 2 XX 3 XX 4 XX 5 XX 6 XX 7 XX 8 XX 9 Title Findings Purpose Relationship to Other Laws, Regulations and Ordinances Applicability
More informationWildlife Management Plan A1924, O. Mumme, Survey 344, Track 227, Acres
Wildlife Management Plan 2014-2018 A1924, O. Mumme, Survey 344, Track 227, 50.01 Acres TABLE OF CONTENTS Wildlife Management Plan 2014-2018 Edwards Plateau TABLE OF CONTENTS.2 TPWD WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
More informationMONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR SELECTIVE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT AND BANK RESTORATION (RANCHO SAN CARLOS AREA)
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR SELECTIVE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT AND BANK RESTORATION (RANCHO SAN CARLOS AREA) IN THE CARMEL RIVER CHANNEL, SUMMER AND FALL 2014 SELECTIVE
More informationStrong site and year specific needs, particularly driven by annual systems Well drained, <1200 m, over diverse soil types
California s grasslands span over 10% of CA s land area (5,640,400 ha). The grasslands are also a key understory component of California s woodlands and coastal scrub, so grassland species cover at least
More informationWildlife Habitat as it relates to Forestry
Wildlife Habitat as it relates to Forestry Wildlife and the forests in which they live are linked closely together. The abundance of most wildlife populations and associated forested lands has paralleled
More information-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE
CHAPTER 20.496 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE HABITAT AND OTHER RESOURCE AREAS Sec. 20.496.005 Applicability. Sec. 20.496.010 Purpose. Sec. 20.496.015 ESHA - Development Application Procedures. Sec. 20.496.020
More informationCOON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW
16-054 Woodland Creek Wetland Banking Restoration Project, Page 1 of 6 COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW MEETING DATE: August 22, 2016 AGENDA NUMBER: 11 FILE NUMBER: 16-054 ITEM: Woodland Creek
More informationAPPENDIX P EL DORADO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN: APPLICABLE SECTIONS FROM CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
APPENDIX P EL DORADO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN: APPLICABLE SECTIONS FROM CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT SOIL CONSERVATION OBJECTIVE 7.1.2: EROSION/SEDIMENTATION Minimize soil erosion and sedimentation.
More informationU.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT
PUBLIC NOTICE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Gate King Properties, LLC Tract 50283 Public Notice/Application No.: SPL-2011-01067-GS Project: Gate
More informationEA 04- Date: December 7, 2015 Project ID No
Hazardous Waste and Material Consistent with the 2008 IS/EA, existing structures shall be investigated for potential hazardous materials or contamination issues prior to construction. Consistent with the
More informationBIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION WILDLIFE AND BOTANY REPORTS
BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION WILDLIFE AND BOTANY REPORTS and MANAGEMENT INDICATOR SPECIES EVALUATIONS for SCE STRAWBERRY PEAK FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT Mountaintop Ranger District San Bernardino National
More informationSANTA CLARA Protections in place:
SANTA CLARA s in place: General Plan Language Specific Tree Retention/ Replacement The Tree prohibits cutting 12 dbh trees on hillside zone parcels
More informationNatural Resources KEY ISSUES SCENIC AREA ACT PROVISIONS CHAPTER 3. not adversely affect natural resources [Section 6(d)(3)].
CHAPTER 3 Natural Resources Climate, geology, soils, and other environmental factors combine to make the Gorge rich in natural resources. For this chapter, natural resources mean wetlands, streams, ponds
More informationMitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Concord Community Reuse Project
Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Concord Community Reuse Prepared for: As Adopted Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Concord Community Reuse Prepared For: 1950 Parkside Drive. MS/56 Concord,
More informationNapa County General Plan, June 23, 2009 Natural Resources Policies
Napa County General Plan, June 23, 2009 Natural Resources Policies (SINCE THESE POLICIES HAVE BEEN ADOPTED THE CLIMATE PROGNOSIS HAS BECOME MORE THREATENING TO WATERSHEDS AND THE RATE OF CHANGE HAS ACCELERATED
More informationEXHIBIT A FISH AND GAME CORRESPONDENCE
EXHIBIT A FISH AND GAME CORRESPONDENCE State of California Memorandum To : Kim Tschantz County of Santa Cruz 701 Ocean Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Date : February 27, 1997 From : Department of Fish and
More information3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section describes biological resources in the vicinity of the proposed project including local habitats, communities, and species, and evaluates the potential impacts project
More informationCHAPTER 4. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ESTIMATED LEVEL OF TAKE
0 0 0 CHAPTER. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ESTIMATED LEVEL OF TAKE. INTRODUCTION The Butte Regional Conservation Plan (BRCP) impact assessment describes the adverse impacts of implementing the covered activities
More informationCATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity.
29. ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA CATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity. The requirement to obtain an environmental development permit is cited in Section
More information3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Rocklin 60 project (proposed project) includes the subdivision of 56.9 acres of land, construction of 179 single-family, detached dwelling units, and installation
More informationA. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures
A. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures The City of Pismo Beach (the City) determined that the Proposed Project could potentially result in significant environmental effects and required the preparation
More informationPhase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)
Permit Application No.: 17-181 Rules: Erosion Control, Wetland Protection, and Waterbody Crossings & Structures Applicant: Hennepin County Received: 4/27/17 Project: CSAH 112 Phase II Complete: 9/5/17
More informationAppendix Q Conceptual Mitigation Plan for Impacts to Wetlands and Other Waters of the United States
for Impacts to Wetlands and Other Waters of the United States Q.1 Introduction This Conceptual Mitigation Plan (Plan) is intended to provide a framework for identifying the potential mitigation areas and
More informationKINGS RIVER PLANNING UNIT Kings River Watershed
Existing Conditions & Uses Overview Remote parcel in rugged canyon with adjoining whitewater rafting base camps 100 acres in Fresno County The Kings River Planning Unit is outside any FERC Project boundary
More information6.0 ALTERNATIVES. The alternatives that are evaluated in this section include the following:
6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.0 ALTERNATIVES This chapter evaluates alternatives to the proposed project and examines the potential environmental impacts associated with each alternative. Through comparison of these
More informationENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS AND ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF LANDELS HILL-BIG CREEK NATURAL RESERVE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LANDELS HILL-BIG CREEK NATURAL RESERVE I. ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationAugust clarified 4.0 CONSERVATION PROGRAM
4.0 CONSERVATION PROGRAM Section 4.0 of this HCP describes the Conservation Program that has been developed to avoid and minimize the potential adverse effects of the Covered Activities on the Covered
More informationSTAFF REPORT WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION COVERED SHELTERS AND BIKE RACKS
STAFF REPORT WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION COVERED SHELTERS AND BIKE RACKS TO: Douglas County Hearing Examiner FROM: Douglas County Land Services Staff RE: SP-2019-02 DATE: April 8,
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationWETLANDS AND OPEN WATERS Compensatory Mitigation Definitions of Factors
Adverse effects as used in this section of the SOP means any adverse ecological effect on wetlands or areas of open water. Those effects, or impacts, include filling, excavating, flooding, draining, clearing,
More information2.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
2.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The goals of the Altona Forest Environmental Management Plan are: To protect and maintain the Altona Forest Property as an integral part of the I. larger ecosystem, so that it
More information(1) The proposed commercial solar energy generation facility is either
(2) The design and siting of these facilities shall avoid the placement of turbines on or immediately adjacent to the upwind side of ridge crests; (3) The design may include other design features to minimize
More informationSECTION ENVIRONMENTAL SUB-INDEX TREE PROTECTION PRESERVATION AND HARVESTING
SECTION 10.00 ENVIRONMENTAL SUB-INDEX 10.00 ENVIRONMENTAL 10.01 GENERAL 10.02 TREE PROTECTION PRESERVATION AND HARVESTING A. Tree Protection Fencing B. Temporary Silt/Tree Protection Fencing C. Boardwalk
More information1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Determination of Flood Control Easement in Carpinteria Marsh
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 65402 Determination of Flood Control Easement in Carpinteria Marsh Deputy Director: Dave Ward Staff Report Date: April 11, 2008 Division: Development Review South
More informationSection 4.10 Ecosystems and Biological Resources
Section 4.10 Ecosystems and Biological Resources This section summarizes the existing ecosystems and biological resources in the project area and the potential impacts of the proposed alternatives on these
More informationSec ESH Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area Overlay District.
Sec. 35-97. ESH Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area Overlay District. Sec. 35-97.1. Purpose and Intent. W i h the County of Santa Barbara there are areas whsch contain unique natural resources andlor
More informationProposed Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the California Tiger. Salamander and California Red-Legged Frog, Sonoma County, California
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/17/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-14853, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4310 55 DEPARTMENT OF THE
More informationCOASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 NCCP PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: SAN DIEGO RIVER CALMAT PROPERTY PHASE 2
COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 NCCP PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: SAN DIEGO RIVER CALMAT PROPERTY PHASE 2 File No. 03-137 Project Manager: Marc Beyeler RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization
More informationFINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VERONICA MEADOWS SPECIFIC PLAN. January 2005
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VERONICA MEADOWS SPECIFIC PLAN January 2005 City of Santa Barbara Community Development Department Planning Division URS Corporation 130 Robin Hill Road, Suite 100 Santa
More informationHAU FIELD INVENTORY PROCEDURES
HAU FIELD INVENTORY PROCEDURES *PRE-FIELD* 1. ASSEMBLE FIELD MATERIALS Rare species, rare habitats, and invasives lists Blank polygon data sheets Field data sheet narrative/definitions PIWO and RLF info
More informationUniversity of Florida Conservation Areas Land Management Plan Trillium Slope (Golf Course Woods)
University of Florida Conservation Areas Land Management Plan Trillium Slope (Golf Course Woods) Introduction Trillium Slope (Golf Course Woods) is a 4.9-acre Conservation Area named after a plant that
More informationInformation Sheet: Development within Wildlife Habitat Areas, including development within Gunnison Sage-grouse habitat
Gunnison County, CO Community Development Department 221 N. Wisconsin St. Ste. D Gunnison, CO 81230 (970) 641-0360 Website: www.gunnisoncounty.org Email: planning@gunnisoncounty.org Information Sheet:
More informationIllinois DNR Conservation Ecosystems Program Project Grant Application for FY 2008
Illinois DNR Conservation 2000 - Ecosystems Program Project Grant Application for FY 2008 Project Classification: Habitat [Deadline: Wednesday, February 28, 2007] Applicant Information Ecosystem Partnership
More information4.1 Introduction and Approach
4.1 Introduction and Approach This chapter addresses the potential effects of the covered activities described in Chapter 2, Land Use and Covered Activities. These potential effects are assessed for covered
More informationSTAFF REPORT CHELAN COUNTY PUD DAROGA DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM
STAFF REPORT CHELAN COUNTY PUD DAROGA DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM TO: Douglas County Hearing Examiner FROM: Douglas County Land Services Staff RE: Chelan County PUD, SCUP-12-01 DATE: July 5, 2012 I. GENERAL
More informationThe Wyoming Wildlife Advocates also value the Caribou-Targhee National
May 20, 2016 Jay Pence District Ranger USDA Forest Service Caribou-Targhee National Forest P.O. Box 777 Driggs, ID 83422 Re: Comments on the proposed Southern Valley Recreation Project, submitted to the
More information3.15 SNAG AND SNAG ASSOCIATED SPECIES
3.15 SNAG AND SNAG ASSOCIATED SPECIES 3.15.1 Scope of the Analysis Snags play an important role in creating biodiversity on the landscape. They provide holes that are homes for birds and small mammals,
More informationWetland restoration and monitoring on the Chevelon Wildlife Area
Wetland restoration and monitoring on the Chevelon Wildlife Area Michael Ingraldi, Ph.D. Research Branch Arizona Game and Fish Department Phoenix, Arizona 85023 The Chevelon State Wildlife Area is located
More informationSANTA CLARA VALLEY HABITAT PLAN DEVELOPMENT FEE NEXUS STUDY JUNE 30, 2012 WITH URBAN ECONOMICS
SANTA CLARA VALLEY HABITAT PLAN DEVELOPMENT FEE NEXUS STUDY JUNE 30, 2012 WITH URBAN ECONOMICS This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS... I! LIST OF TABLES... II! 1. INTRODUCTION
More information