Upcoming ACRP Webinars

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Upcoming ACRP Webinars"

Steven Fox
6 years ago
Views:

1 Information on ACRP Regular news and updates on: o Upcoming and ongoing research projects o New publications o Success stories o Announcements o Webinars Find ACRP on Facebook and LinkedIn

2 Upcoming ACRP Webinars September 22 nd - Topics of Special Concern for General Aviation Airports October 21 st Legal Aspects of Airport Programs November 5 th Guidance for Understanding WiFi Disruptions and Cyber Security at Airports You can register for and learn more about these webinars by visiting:

3 Additional ACRP Publications on this Topic ACRP Report 32 A Guidebook for Addressing Aircraft/Wildlife Hazards at General Aviation Airports ACRP Legal Research Digest 20 Airport Liability for Wildlife Management ACRP Synthesis 23 Bird Harassment, Repellent, and Deterrent Techniques for Use on and Near Airports ACRP Synthesis 39 Airport Wildlife Population Management ACRP Synthesis 52 Habitat Management to Deter Wildlife at Airports You can learn more about these publications by visiting

4 Today s Speakers Moderated by Amy Anderson, FAA 1) ACRP Report 122: Innovative Airport Responses to Threatened/Endangered Species Julie Sullivan, Environmental Science Associates 2) ACRP Report 125: Balancing Airport Stormwater and Bird Hazard Management Kim Allerton, Environmental Resource Solutions, Inc., John Lengel, Gresham, Smith and Partners, and Paul Esposito, STAR Consultants, Inc.

5 ACRP Report 122: Innovative Airport Responses to Threatened and Endangered Species Julie Sullivan

6 Julie M. Sullivan, M.S. Principal Investigator Southeast Regional Director / Vice President, Environmental Science Associates (ESA) Airport Environmental Project Manager Former State Regulator (Florida)

7 ACRP Report 122 Oversight Panel Catherine Boyles, Dallas/Ft. Worth Airport, Panel Chairman Dana R. Green, Portland International Airport Peggy Nguyen, Los Angeles World Airports John E. Ostrom, Minneapolis-St Paul International Airport Kelly Schmoker, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Jeffrey R. Wood, McFarland Johnson, Inc. Suki Gill, FAA Liaison John Weller, FAA Liaison Patrice Ashfield, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Liaison Michael J. Begier, U.S. Department of Agriculture Liaison Joseph D. Navarrete, ACRP Senior Program Officer

8 ACRP Report 122: Innovative Airport Responses to Threatened and Endangered Species Primer to help airports creatively address federally listed species at or near airports Provides information on the unique challenges airports face balancing environmental stewardship with safety Provides airports, regulatory agencies, and stakeholders with information, case studies and tools Designed to facilitate working together to reach practical solutions that maintain airport safety and protect species Published January 2015

9 Research Problem Airports often occupy large tracts of land with development limitations including zoning, safety, operational efficiency, environmental, noise Safety related to wildlife interactions is well known, but many airports are less familiar with constraints associated with threatened or endangered species Regulators charged with the protection of those species are often not always aware of the myriad of airport development constraints Where missions conflict, there is a potential for compromised safety, increased costs, or adverse affect on long term aviation or species protection goals

10 Research Approach Goal: To provide a single source of information for airports seeking information to address issues related to T&E species Approach based upon the premise that there are examples of airports effectively addressing T&E species issues and maintaining good working relationships with those agencies Initiated with thorough literature research including: Publications, electronic information, agency contacts, and project team and panelist knowledge and experience

11 Research Approach (cont.) Develop an introduction to relevant regulations Provide clarification of roles and responsibilities Identify potential conflicts between airports and T&E species Discuss typical process challenges and how to anticipate and overcome them (pre- and post-listing) Present information to facilitate developing and maintaining stakeholder relationships Compile a series of tools and innovative approaches Reinforce with diverse series of Case Study examples Provide a Toolbox with concise information for both airports and regulators

12 Research Results Introduction to Endangered Species Regulation Identification of Potential Conflicts with Airport Actions Roles and responsibilities Typical airport actions that could create T&E conflicts Key Issue Area Wildlife Hazard Management Potential Conflict Onsite breeding / nesting for listed species Wetland mitigation on or near airport Stormwater management systems Establishment of species preserve or conservation areas Maintenance and Operations Airport Development Onsite breeding / nesting for listed species Mitigation, natural areas or preserve areas on or near airport Special events Onsite preservation of burrowing species Construction, land acquisition, demolition Natural habitat or conservation areas on or near airport Stormwater management systems

13 Research Results Innovative Process Solutions Typical Process Challenges Solutions and Examples Variable experience Establish single agency point of contact Level of review at planning stage Accelerate review, engage agencies early in the process Inconsistency in reviews Establish documentation processes, permit tracking

14 Research Results Developing and maintaining stakeholder relationships Key to build support for an airport s mission Agency and public stakeholders can provide valuable input to help identify issues and garner support for airport objectives Pre- and post-listing Important to be aware of listing efforts and status Critical habitat an important issue for airports Species delisted may still have protection(s) Tools and innovative approaches Case Studies Airport Toolbox

15 Putting Research Into Action This primer is intended to be used by both airports and regulators to better inform all parties involved of the development challenges unique to airports and the core missions of the agencies To be used as a quick reference for T&E issues, including guidance, processes and resolution Glossary of terms, regulation summaries, relevance To provide information through specific examples of innovative and successful actions

16 Putting Research Into Action Process challenges and solutions Information to be used by airports to foster relationships with regulatory professionals and stakeholders Provide examples of successful approaches and inform airport sponsors in their establishment or enhancement of environmental compliance processes Project identified has process challenge Review report for example solutions Work with regulator(s) to develop approach Implement project!

17 Putting Research Into Action Tools and innovative approaches Non-traditional solutions that can facilitate projects where conventional approaches may not meet all stakeholder needs While some may take more time to implement on the front end, they can greatly facilitate projects in the long run Safe harbor agreements Candidate conservation agreements Habitat conservation plans Conservation banking and recovery credits Programmatic consultations and biological opinions Adaptive management plans

Putting Research Into Action Case Studies for Innovative Airport Responses Provides

adjacent to airport property Case studies are widely diverse in terms of facility

all species, these are intended to provide the user with a sampling of diverse

18 Putting Research Into Action Case Studies for Innovative Airport Responses Provides a summary of how a particular airport addressed listed species issues on and adjacent to airport property Case studies are widely diverse in terms of facility size, ownership, capacity, geography and species involved While not comprehensive of all species, these are intended to provide the user with a sampling of diverse situations, regulatory settings and challenges and the innovative solutions effective in each case

19 Putting Research Into Action Airport State Species Highlight Mid-size regional hub CA Giant garter snake Multi-species mitigation plan Portland Int l Airport OR Streaked horned lark Candidate listing, stakeholder involvement, critical habitat Indianapolis Int l Airport IN Indiana bat Stakeholder partnering, species relocation, HCP Mineta San Jose CA Burrowing owl Management of listed species on airfield Vero Beach Municipal FL FL scrub jay, Wood stork Umbrella HCP, vegetation management Roseburg Regional OR Coho salmon NOAA Fisheries consultation, innovative project design Brown Field Municipal CA San Diego fairy shrimp, Coastal CA gnatcatcher Sanford-Orlando Int l Airport Multi-agency coordination and mitigation strategy FL Bald eagle Delisted species with other federal protections Kodiak Airport AK Steller sea lion, humpback whale, N. sea otter, Steller s eider Multi-species and multi-agency coordination, mitigated in-water work

Putting Research Into Action Airport Toolbox Understanding

non-airport stakeholders ESA Information Custom developed fact

templates intended for customization and airport use Additional

20 Putting Research Into Action Airport Toolbox Understanding Airports Includes customizable brochure-style information for non-airport stakeholders ESA Information Custom developed fact sheets for airport users Tools for Airports Checklists, forms, templates intended for customization and airport use Additional Information Information from publically available sources (USFWS fact sheets and forms)

21 Putting Research Into Action Be creative! This primer is intended to be used as a basis for the development of a customized approach for airports there is no one size fits all Use this information to facilitate discussions and develop stakeholder relationships Stay informed

22 For additional information: ACRP Report 122: Innovative Airport Responses to Threatened and Endangered Species rbs/ aspx Julie Sullivan o jsullivan@esassoc.com

23 ACRP Report 125: Balancing Airport Stormwater and Wildlife Hazard Management: Analysis Tools and Guidance Kim M. Allerton, President Environmental Resource Solutions, Inc. John A. Lengel Jr., P.E., Executive VP Gresham, Smith & Partners Paul Esposito, CIH, CSP STAR Consultants, Inc.

24 ACRP Report 125 Panel Chair Mr. Kevin A. Gurchak, Manager, Environmental Compliance, Allegheny County, PA Airport Authority - Pittsburgh International Airport Members Mr. Nick A. Atwell, Wildlife Manager Aviation, Port of Portland, OR Dr. Bradley F. Blackwell, Research Wildlife Biologist, USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center Mr. James T. Driscoll, Raptor Management Coordinator, Arizona Game and Fish Department Ms. Peggy Nguyen, Manager, Wildlife and Air Quality, Los Angeles World Airports Ms. Debora Roth, PE, SW District Office Section Manager, Ohio EPA - Division of Surface Water FAA Liaison Mr. John M. Robinson, Civil Engineer, Federal Aviation Administration Other Liaison Ms. Katherine B. Preston, Director, Environmental Affairs, Airports Council International - North America TRB Liaison Ms. Christine Gerencher, Senior Program Officer for Aviation, Transportation Research Board, Technical Activities (Div. A)

25 Problem Statement Airports are required to manage the quantity and quality of stormwater on site while ensuring the safety of aircraft operations. Many stormwater management options can create potential aviation wildlife hazards. In addition, airports are faced with potentially conflicting federal, state, and local stormwater and wildlife management regulations and guidance. Research is therefore needed to develop proactive tools and guidance to assist airports in making decisions that balance stormwater management and wildlife hazard management.

26 Tool Overview Safety Management Systems (SMS) Approach to Tool Development SMS Risk Process Steps: Step 1 - Describe the system (Stormwater BMP); Step 2 - Identify the hazards (Birds); Step 3 - Determine the risk; Step 4 - Assess and analyze the risk; Step 5 - Treat the Risk Step 6 - Manage the Risk Risk is the product of Likelihood & Severity Result is a Risk Matrix Tool allows the user to assess the potential risk associated with attraction of water dependent birds to a selected stormwater BMP at an airport.

27 Risk Matrix 5X5 Matrix with: 5 Severity Factors and 5 Likelihood Factors High 15 Moderate > 5 < 15 Low 5

28 Project Specific Risk Matrix

29 Severity Factors (5) Species: Select species of greatest concern and tool autopopulates standardized relative hazard score (Devault et. al., 2011) BMP Perimeter Irregularity: The ratio of the pond perimeter to the perimeter of a perfect circle of equal area BMP Apparent Slope to Water s Edge: Horizontal run (H): Vertical rise (V) BMP- Proximity of Water Bodies (from each other): Distance between additional water bodies (i.e. natural or manmade ponds/wetlands/rivers) in the vicinity of the surface water being evaluated in the tool. Use closest water body BMP Percentage of stormwater vegetation coverage: ow:ew is the ratio of area of open water to area of emergent and woody vegetation

30 Likelihood Factors (5) History of Observations: How often the species of concern is observed by airport staff Proximity of Bird Sightings: Where the species are being observed in relation to the runway History of Strikes: Total percentage of strikes from strike database for species being evaluated (only evaluate strike data within the last 5 years) History of total bird strikes per operations compared to the national average: Is your bird strike rate (strikes/operations) within 1 or 2 SD of the national average. Proximity of BMP to airport movement areas: Where is the BMP in relation to the AOA (using FAA recommended separation distances from AC 150/ B)

31 Mitigations (aka Controls) Mitigations, both existing and new, impact initial and residual risk, respectively. Hierarchy of Mitigations include: Elimination (most effective) Substitution Engineering Warnings Administrative (least effective) Not Practical Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) concepts were used to determine the risk reductions that can be applied for Mitigations Risk reduction increases if the mitigation is ongoing as opposed to applied at the time of sighting only (e.g. an effigy on display is ongoing whereas shooting to kill is upon sighting only )

kallerton@ersenvironmental.com Amy Reed o areed@ersenvironmental.

32 For additional information: ACRP Report 125: Balancing Airport Stormwater and Wildlife Hazard Management: Analysis Tools and Guidance Kim Allerton o kallerton@ersenvironmental.com Amy Reed o areed@ersenvironmental.com John Lengel o john_lengel@gspnet.com Paul Esposito o paul.esposito@starconsultants.net

Bird Strike Risk Analysis ACRP Report 125 ACI Fri, 1/13/17. Paul Esposito, CIH, CSP STAR Consultants, Inc.

Bird Strike Risk Analysis ACRP Report 125 ACI Fri, 1/13/17 Paul Esposito, CIH, CSP STAR Consultants, Inc. Paul.esposito@starconsultants.net STAR > Overview STAR has been in business since 1997 Safety Through