Worksheet Documentation of Land Use Plan Conformance and NEPA Adequacy (DNA) U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
|
|
- Evan Osborne
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Worksheet Documentation of Land Use Plan Conformance and NEPA Adequacy (DNA) U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Note: This worksheet is to be completed consistent with the policies stated in the Instruction Memorandum entitled Documentation of Land Use Plan Conformance and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Adequacy transmitting this worksheet and the Guidelines for Using the DNA Worksheet located at the end of the worksheet. (Note: The signed CONCLUSION at the end of this worksheet is part of an interim step in the BLM s internal analysis process and does not constitute an appealable decision.) A. BLM Office: Klamath Falls Office Lease/Serial/Case File No. _ Proposed Action Title/Type: Field Office Prescribed Fire Operations for FY 2001 and Location of Proposed Action: Klamath Falls Resource Area, Lakeview District, Oregon Description of the Proposed Action: PRESCRIBED FIRE as identified in Environmental Assessment OR on the following projects initiated through random selection: Stukel Mtn. 98-2, Stukel Mtn. 98-7&9, Rattlesnake 1 & 7, Norcross, Wild-Midway, Brady Butte, Stateline, Big Adobe, Devaul Plus (Wilkerson Horse Camp), Kakapoo Stew, Yainax Butte, Hamaker Canyon. In addition the following projects have a separate Environmental Assessment(s), and/or DNA s in addition to the OR listed above: Stiles Springs, Barnes Valley Canyon, Upper Swan, Frosty, Baldy Crest (Frosty EA), Kakapoo Stew (Lower Spencer). B. Conformance with one or more of the following Land Use Plans (LUPs) and/or Related Subordinate Implementation Plans: Klamath Falls Resource Area Record of Klamath Falls Resource Area Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan (June 2, 1995) (KFRA ROD/RMP) Final Klamath Falls Resource Area Management Plan and EIS (FEIS) (Sept. 1994) Klamath Falls Resource Area Fire Management EA#OR (June 10, 1994) Klamath Falls Resource Area Integrated Weed Control Plan (July 21, 1993) Vegetation Treatment on BLM Lands in Thirteen Western States FEIS and ROD (1991), Lakeview District Fire Management Plan - Phase 1 (1998) Record of Decision for Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl (April 1994) also known as the Northwest Forest Plan (NFP). Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on Management Habitat for Late-Successional and Old-Growth Forest Related Species Within the Range of Northern Spotted Owl (Feb. 1994)(FSEIS). *List applicable LUPs (e.g., Resource Management Plans or applicable amendments).
2 **List applicable activity, project, management, water quality restoration, or program plans. X The proposed action is in conformance with the applicable LUPs because it is specifically provided for in the following LUP decisions: The Environmental Assessment OR is specifically incorporated without modification into the RMP by reference on page 4. All random selected Fuels Treatment Zones (called Fire Management Units in the Environmental Assessment OR ) are by reference incorporated into the KFRA Resource Management Plan. After further analysis, the 1995 RMP increased (to 84,900) the decadal total number of acres to be treated in fuels treatments. The proposed action is in conformance with the LUP, even though it is not specifically provided for, because it is clearly consistent with the following LUP decisions (objectives, terms, and conditions) and, if applicable, implementation plan decisions: N.A. C. Identify the applicable NEPA document(s) and other related documents that cover the proposed action. List by name and date all applicable NEPA documents that cover the proposed action. All random selection prescribed fire are consistent with Environmental Assessment OR KFRA Fire Management. Non-Random: Upper Swan Prescribed Fire EA OR Frosty & Baldy Crest EA OR Lower Spencer (Kakapoo Stew) EA OR Stiles Springs EA OR Barnes Valley Canyon EA OR Miller Creek/Frog Camp EA OR List by name and date other documentation relevant to the proposed action (e.g., source drinking water assessments, biological assessment, biological opinion, watershed assessment, allotment evaluation, rangeland health standard s assessment and determinations, and monitoring the report). Lower Spencer Landscape Analysis, Topsy - Pokegamma Landscape Analysis, Jenny Creek Watershed Analysis. All burns are covered under the Programmatic Informal Consultation for the Prescribed Fire Program I-77, May 1999.
3 DNA OR Prescribed Fire Page 3 D. NEPA Adequacy Criteria 1. Is the current proposed action substantially the same action (or is a part of that action) as previously analyzed? YES All random selections are part of the original group processed by methodology discussed in 1995 IDT for EA OR The process included the use of weighted values for each FTZ. All FTZ s were entered into a Quattro Pro spreadsheet and compared to a random number generated by the spreadsheet program. A second random process (drawing FTZ numbers from a hat) was used to further decrease the selected treatment population. 2. Is the range of alternatives analyzed in the existing NEPA document(s) appropriate with respect to the current proposed action, given current environmental concerns, interests, resource values, and circumstances? YES A review of the Landscape/Watershed Assessments and Environmental Assessments written for non-random prescribed fire projects attest to the general thoroughness of the OR document. 3. Is the existing analysis adequate and are the conclusions adequate in light of any new information or circumstances (including, for example, riparian proper functioning condition [PFC] reports; rangeland health standards assessments; Unified Watershed Assessment categorizations; inventory and monitoring data; most recent Fish and Wildlife Service lists of threatened, endangered, proposed, and candidate species; most recent BLM lists of sensitive species)? Can you reasonably conclude that all new information and all new circumstances are insignificant with regard to analysis of the proposed action? YES No new information applies so the same conclusion exists as the OR document. 4. Do the methodology and analytical approach used in the existing NEPA document(s) continue to be appropriate for the current proposed action? YES Even though there are new computer models available, the original methodology and analytical approach used in the existing NEPA documents continues to give equal or better results. 5. Are the direct and indirect impacts of the current proposed action substantially unchanged from those identified in the existing NEPA document(s)? Does the existing NEPA document
4 DNA OR Prescribed Fire Page 4 sufficiently analyze site-specific impacts related to the current proposed action? YES Everything remains basically the same. The number of Survey and Manage Species requiring monitoring has actually decreased in relation to the original analysis. 6. Can you conclude without additional analysis or information that the cumulative impacts that would result from implementation of the current proposed action are substantially unchanged from those analyzed in the existing NEPA document(s)? YES The cumulative impacts resulting from implementation of the current proposed action remain unchanged. 7. Are the public involvement and interagency review associated with existing NEPA document(s) adequately for the current proposed action? YES The projects have been available to the public through a combination of several methods 1) legal notice in the local newspaper (spring 1999 and 2000), 2) requested public comment for site specific non-random Environmental Assessments i.e. Stiles Spring and Barnes Valley Canyon. 3) The concept was well addressed during the process for the programmatic Environmental Assessment OR , 4) telephone contacts and face to face visits to adjacent land owners are made by resource area staff (this is documented by staff), 5) The pre-burn notification process using public radio and television announcements. The nature of the public involvement associated with the existing NEPA is still valid. E. Interdisciplinary Analysis: Identify those team members conducting or participating in the preparation of this worksheet. Resource Name Title Represented Joe Foran Fuels Management Specialist Fire Gayle Sitter Wildlife Biologist Wildlife William Lindsey Range Conservationist Range Lou Whiteaker Botanist Vegetation Projects are discussed and approved by Interdisciplinary Team on a yearly basis and specialists are consulted throughout the planning and implementation process. All project areas have been or are contracted to be surveyed for Cultural Resources, Threatened
5 DNA OR Prescribed Fire Page 5 and Endangered Species, and Survey and Manage Species where required. F. Mitigation Measures: List any applicable mitigation measures that were identified, analyzed, and approved in relevant LUPs and existing NEPA document(s). List the specific mitigation measures or identify an attachment that includes those specific mitigation measures. Document that these applicable mitigation measures must be incorporated and implemented. Best management practices will apply. Project Design Features identified under informal consultation will be incorporated as appropriate. CONCLUSION X Based on the review documented above, I conclude that this proposal conforms to the applicable land use plan and that the existing NEPA documentation fully covers the proposed action and constitutes BLM s compliance with the requirements of NEPA. Note: If one or more of the criteria are not met, a conclusion of conformance and/or NEPA adequacy cannot be made and this box cannot be checked / Teresa A. Raml / Signature of the Responsible Official April 25, 2001 Date
6
In Reply Refer To: 5400/1792 (OR-120) OR Mister Slate CT Timber Sale EA OR Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment.
In Reply Refer To: United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT COOS BAY DISTRICT OFFICE 1300 AIRPORT LANE, NORTH BEND, OR 97459 Web Address: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/coosbay
More informationSAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER
Decision Notice And Finding of No Significant Impact Watershed and Fisheries Conservation Treatments SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Public Lands Center Rio
More informationMANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST
MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST FERRON RANGER DISTRICT CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW FILE NUMBER: 2240 PROJECT TITLE: Olsen-McCadden Livestock Water Development PROJECT LEAD: Steven Cox ESTIMATED DATE FOR
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Washington, DC
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Washington, DC 20240-0002 http://www.blm.gov In Reply Refer to: 1610, 1734, 4100, 4180, 6700 (230) P EMS TRANSMISSION Instruction Memorandum
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake
2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake USDA Forest Service Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Klamath County, Oregon Background The Crescent Ranger District maintains 66 recreation
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Gold Lake Bog Research Natural Area Boundary Adjustment and Nonsignificant Forest Plan Amendment #53 USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District,
More informationNotice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Monument
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/24/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-15023, and on FDsys.gov 4310-DQ-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau
More informationDECISION MEMO. USDA Forest Service. Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36
Page 1 of 5 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36 Northwestern Energy operates utility systems and facilities on federal lands under a Master
More informationDECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte Ranger District Silver Bow County, Montana T. 2 N., R. 9 W., Section 32 The North Fork of Divide Creek is approximately 4 miles west of the
More informationThe project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.
DECISION MEMO Tributary to Brushy Fork Culvert Replacements Private Land USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Powell Ranger District Nez Perce Clearwater National Forests Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision
More informationRocky Mountain Regional Office
Forest Service File Code: 1570 Route To: Rocky Mountain Regional Office 740 Simms Street Golden, CO 80401-4702 Voice: 303-275-5350 TDD: 303-275-5367 Date: June 13, 2013 Subject: To: Recommendation Memorandum
More informationPayette National Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Payette National Forest 800 W Lakeside Ave McCall ID 83638-3602 208-634-0700 File Code: 1570 Date: December 20, 2010 Debra K. Ellers Western Idaho
More informationBureau of Land Management National Sage-Grouse Habitat Conservation Strategy
Bureau of Land Management National Sage-Grouse Habitat Conservation Strategy 1.3.1 Guidance for Addressing Sagebrush Habitat Conservation in BLM Land Use Plans U.S. Department of the Interior November
More informationDECISION MEMO. Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118. MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118)
DECISION MEMO Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118 MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118) USDA Forest Service - Lolo National Forest Missoula Ranger District
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SALEM DISTRICT OFFICE Marys Peak Resource Area Lincoln County, Oregon CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD Project: Miami Corporation
More informationUnited States Department of the Interior
United States Department of the Interior I:'( RE P! Y RE ~ER TO BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS Pacific Regional Office 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California 95825 Honorable Leonard Masten Chairman. Hoopa Valley
More informationCentral Oregon Cohesive Strategy Initiative
Central Oregon Cohesive Strategy Initiative Background and Concept September 2015 The National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy The Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement Act (FLAME)
More informationRECORD OF DECISION BATTLE PARK C&H ALLOTMENTS FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE AND MISTY MOON S&G. United States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Bighorn National Forest RECORD OF DECISION FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE BATTLE PARK C&H AND MISTY MOON S&G ALLOTMENTS September
More informationDraft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan
Draft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan USDA Forest Service Aspen-Sopris Ranger District, White River National Forest Gunnison Ranger District, Grand
More informationPROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe
PROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Proposed Action The Santa Rosa Ranger District of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is proposing to remove all unauthorized
More informationKeefer Pasture Drift Fence Project. Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest
Keefer Pasture Drift Fence Project Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest PROPOSED ACTION The Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District proposes construction of approximately.11 miles
More informationAppendix J Greater Sage-grouse Habitat Equivalency Analysis
TransWest Express EIS Appendix J Greater Sage-grouse Habitat Equivalency Analysis TransWest Express EIS Appendix J J-1 Compliance with Applicable Greater Sage-grouse Polices and Applicant Proposed Mitigation
More informationDECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) FOR CASA LOMA RECREATION RESIDENCE PERMIT RENEWAL U.S. FOREST SERVICE CIBOLA NATIONAL FOREST SANDIA RANGER DISTRICT BERNALILLO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
More information3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance 3-13.1 Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity NEPA requires consideration of the relationship
More informationAshland Tree Planting Project
DECISION MEMO Ashland Tree Planting Project Ashland Ranger District Custer National Forest USDA Forest Service Powder River and Rosebud Counties, Montana Purpose and Need for Proposing Action Forest cover
More informationParadise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page)
Paradise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page) T 34 S, R 15 E, Sections 11, 13 and 14 The purpose of the project would be to stabilize the stream channel by treating headcuts
More informationBANFIELD #9 LODE CLAIM (Plan of Operations) Umpqua National Forest Tiller Ranger District June, 2011
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region BANFIELD #9 LODE CLAIM (Plan of Operations) Umpqua National Forest Tiller Ranger District June, 2011 ii Introduction and
More informationChapter 4 - Consultation and Coordination
Chapter 4 - Consultation and Coordination Chapter 4-1 Mt. Hood Meadows Parking Improvements EIS Chapter 4-2 4.0. Consultation and Coordination Chapter 4 - Consultation and Coordination This chapter provides
More informationYankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact
Yankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact USDA Forest Service Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests And Pawnee National Grassland Clear Creek Ranger District
More informationDecision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010
Decision Memo Tongass National Forest Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010 Decision It is my decision to authorize pre-commercial thinning (PCT) on approximately 7,500 acres of overstocked young-growth forest
More informationDECISION MEMO IDAHO DREAM PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 7 BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Dillon Ranger District Beaverhead County The project area is included in the Ermont Mining District in T5S R11W Section 36 and T6S R11W Section
More informationIDT Discussions on HRM Expansion Compiled on April 10, 2014
IDT Discussions on HRM Expansion Compiled on April 10, 2014 IDT identified that Alternative 4 would fully address the cross-country skiing issues that were raised. The alternative locations suggested in
More informationFontana Project Scoping Record August 2013
Fontana Project Scoping Record August 2013 The Cheoah Ranger District, Nantahala National Forest, is conducting an interdisciplinary analysis of a proposed project, called the Fontana Project, in Graham
More informationDraft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI)
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service January 2016 Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI) Rock Creek Vegetation and Fuels Healthy Forest Restoration Act
More informationRecord of Decision. Mt. Hood National Forest and Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. Clackamas, Hood River, Multnomah, and Wasco Counties
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service March 2008 Record of Decision Site-Specific Invasive Plant Treatments for Mt. Hood National Forest and Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area in
More informationSmall Project Proposal
Combined Scoping and Notice and Comment Document Small Project Proposal USDA Forest Service Fishlake National Forest Beaver Ranger District Sevier County, Utah The purpose of this document is to inform
More informationDECISION MEMO. Fall Creek Trail Reroute
DECISION MEMO Fall Creek Trail Reroute USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest Middle Fork Ranger District Lane County, OR Township 18S, Range 3E, Section 21, Willamette Meridian DECISION It is
More informationOregon National Forests:
Oregon National Forests: Deschutes & Ochoco National Forests http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/ Crooked River National Grassland 1001 SW Emkay Drive Bend, OR 97702 (541) 383-5300 Over the past few
More informationHuron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647 989-826-3252 (Voice) 989-826-6073 (Fax) Dial 711 for relay service
More informationIt s Cool to Be Safe
USDA Forest Service San Juan National Forest http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/sanjuan San Juan Public Lands Center 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO 81301 Ph (970) 247-4874 Fax (970) 385-1243 USDI Bureau of Land Management
More informationTim Hayden, Yurok Tribe Natural Resources Division Mat Millenbach, Western Rivers Conservancy Sarah Beesley, Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program
BLUE CREEK FOREST SANCTUARY: RESTORING OLD GROWTH FOREST ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION, PROTECTING SALMON, WILDLIFE, AND TRADITIONAL- LIFE WAYS AND CULTURE IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Tim Hayden, Yurok Tribe Natural
More informationEast Fork Illinois River Channel and Floodplain Restoration Project
East Fork Illinois River Channel and Floodplain Restoration Project Wild Rivers Ranger District, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest /s/ Joni D. Brazier Date: February 20, 2015 Joni D. Brazier, Forest
More informationINTRODUCTION. Page 1 of 24. Consent decision with certain Specified Conditions (stipulations) listed in Attachment P.L , as amended 3
DRAFT DECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT GOAT MOUNTAIN HARDROCK MINERAL PROSPECTING PERMITS USDA FOREST SERVICE, GIFFORD PINCHOT NATIONAL FOREST COWLITZ VALLEY RANGER DISTRICT SKAMANIA
More informationFINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE OURAY RANGER DISTRICT OURAY COUNTY, COLORADO BACKGROUND The Owl Creek Gravel Pit, also known as the Spruce Ridge Pit,
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
Hazeldell Fire Station Land Sale Environmental Assessment Table of Contents Summary...1 Introduction...1 Document Structure...1 Background...3 Purpose and Need for Action...3 Proposed Action...4 Decision
More informationPLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
PLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS What is a Categorical Exclusion? Categorical exclusions are an essential part of NEPA that provide a categorical determination, based on agency experience,
More informationChapter 1. Purpose and Need for Action
Final Environmental Impact Statement Plumas National Forest Chapter 1. Purpose and Need for Action Document Structure The Forest Service has prepared this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in
More informationBlanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact U.S. Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Delta County, Colorado INTRODUCTION The Grand Mesa
More informationDetermining Whether a Proposal is Subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Section 102 Updated March
Determining Whether a Proposal is Subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Section 102 Updated March 2005 1 This paper presents some key thresholds to consider when determining whether a
More informationNotice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Intake. Diversion Dam Fish Passage Project, Dawson County, Montana
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/04/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-33066, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 3720-58 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationMaster Development Plans (MDPs) / Geographic Area Plans (GAPS)
Master Development Plans (MDPs) / Geographic Area Plans (GAPS) COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TOOLS FOR OIL AND GAS PROJECTS BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT COLORADO RIVER VALLEY FIELD OFFICE (CRVFO) SILT, COLORADO
More informationDraft Record of Decision
Final Environmental Impact Statement USDA Forest Service Medicine Bow Routt National Forests Thunder Basin NG Yampa Ranger District Grand and Routt Counties, Colorado Introduction... 1 Background... 2
More informationBLM-MOU-WO
Appendix A. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
More informationJack and Rock Meadows
Jack Creek and Rock Creek Meadows Fuel Reduction and Meadow Restoration Project ---------- Chemult Ranger District Fremont-Winema National Forests Klamath County, Oregon Background Moist and wet meadows
More informationThe Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project
Introduction The Galton Project The Fortine Ranger District of the Kootenai National Forest is in the early stages of developing a project entitled Galton, named for the mountain range dominating the eastern
More informationFINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Record of Decision NEBRASKA AND SAMUEL R. MCKELVIE NATIONAL FORESTS, OGLALA, BUFFALO GAP, AND FORT PIERRE NATIONAL GRASSLANDS
More informationLake Britton Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT
LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT Pit-McCloud River Watershed Lake Britton Planning Unit Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat Conduct surveys of lands outside the FERC boundary to identify biological resources and
More informationCalculating Mitigation
US Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District Calculating Mitigation Lift Loss 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District Under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program, mitigation
More informationCOUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S R15E SECTIONS 3-9 AND
PINE MOUNTAIN SAGE GROUSE HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT Bend/ Fort Rock Ranger District Deschutes National Forest DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S
More informationKlamath Falls Resource Area NEPA Document Routing Slip for Internal Review
Klamath Falls Resource Area NEPA Document Routing Slip for Internal Review Project Name: Tunnel DDR Fuels Reduction And Aspen Restoration (CX-06-04) Date Initiated: 10/25/05 Project Lead/Contact: Matt
More informationCOST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS. Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Activities. USDA Forest Service
December 7, 2005 COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Activities USDA Forest Service COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration
More informationWildlife Resources Report
Wildlife Resources Report Butte Mountain Late Successional Reserve Habitat Restoration Project Goosenest Ranger District, Klamath National Forest Prepared by: Karen West, Wildlife Biologist, USDI Fish
More informationClear Lake Sage-grouse Habitat Improvement Project Phase II Decision Memo
Introduction Clear Lake Sage-grouse Habitat Improvement Project Phase II Decision Memo Modoc National Forest Doublehead Ranger District Modoc County, CA The Clear Lake Sage-grouse Habitat Improvement Project
More informationEden Ridge Timber Sales Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Rogue River Siskiyou National Forest Objection Statements and Responses June 2014
Eden Ridge Timber Sales Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Rogue River Siskiyou National Forest Objection Statements and Responses June 2014 Objectors The Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center (KS) American
More informationInstructions for the SDDOT Categorical Exclusion Checklist and Environmental Commitments Checklist
Instructions for the SDDOT Categorical Exclusion Checklist and South Dakota Department of Transportation Office of Project Development Environmental Becker-Hansen Building 700 E. Broadway Ave. Pierre,
More informationWildlife Conservation Strategy
Wildlife Conservation Strategy Boise National Forest What is the Wildlife Conservation Strategy? The Boise National Forest is developing a Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS) in accordance with its Land
More informationFOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC
Page 1 of 20 FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC Amendment No.: 2500-2010-1 Effective Date: November 23, 2010 Duration: This amendment is effective until superseded or removed.
More informationMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG:
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE U.S. ARMY AT FORT BRAGG U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMAND NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
More informationEnvironmental Impact Statement
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service December 2002 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Metolius Basin Forest Management Project Sisters Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Jefferson
More informationDECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OUTFITTER GUIDE MOTORIZED TOURS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUANCES
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant 1 Impact for the Outfitter Guide Motorized Tours DECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OUTFITTER GUIDE MOTORIZED TOURS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUANCES
More informationAPPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist
APPENDI A NEPA Assessment Checklist NEPA CHECKLIST DATE: January 12, 2009 PREPARER: Frederick Wells, RLA PIN and Project Title: Surplus Property Request Wilder Balter Partners Marketplace Town of Newburgh,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Nicholas S. Cady (OSB # 114363) Cascadia Wildlands P.O. Box 10455 Eugene, Oregon 97440 Tel: 541-434-1463 Fax: 541-434-6494 Email: nick@cascwild.org Charles M. Tebbutt (OSB # 96579) Daniel C. Snyder (OSB
More informationPublic Review Draft Part III Guidelines for the Application of Criteria for Financial Assistance for Local Projects.
Bureau of Reclamation 800 Cottage Way, MP-170 Sacramento, Calif. 9585-1898 Public Review Draft for the Application of Criteria for March 9, 010 To: All Interested Parties and Organizations The U.S. Department
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project The USDA Forest Service is proposing to release and prune living apple trees in the Manchester Ranger District,
More informationDECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 8 DECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County, Montana T2S, R3W, sections 16 & 21 Background Moen Excavation of
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the
More informationOffice of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/03/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-28407, and on FDsys.gov 4310-05-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
More informationNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Jeff Wade Center for Governmental Responsibility University of Florida Levin College of Law The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) first significant,
More informationUnited States Forest Service National Environmental Policy Act Process Fact Sheet. Colorado Cattlemen s Association Colorado Public Lands Council
United States Forest Service National Environmental Policy Act Process Fact Sheet Colorado Cattlemen s Association Compiled by Robbie Baird LeValley with special assistance from the Rocky Mountain Region
More informationExecutive Summary for the Record of Decision
for the Record of Decision for the Record of Decision for the Land Use Plan Amendment to the California Desert Conservation Plan, Bishop Resource Management Plan, and Bakersfield Resource Management Plan
More informationINTERAGENCY AGREEMENT AMONG UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS),
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT AMONG UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS), U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA), AND THE LOUISIANA
More informationAcres within Planning Area. Total Acres Burned
Calf-Copeland Project Description Figure 1: Dead sugar pine in the Calf-Copeland planning area. Sugar pine grow best in open conditions. In the absence of fire disturbance, high densities of Douglas-fir
More informationPreparing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan
Preparing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan A Handbook for Wildland Urban Interface Communities Sponsored By: Communities Committee National Association of Counties National Association of State Foresters
More informationA Landscape Analysis Plan 1
A Landscape Analysis Plan 1 Nancy E. Fleenor 2 Abstract A Landscape Analysis Plan (LAP) sets out broad guidelines for project development within boundaries of the Kings River Sustainable Forest Ecosystems
More informationChapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation
Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation Introduction and Setting Nevada County contains an extremely wide range of plants, animals and habitat types. With topographic elevations ranging from 300 feet in the
More informationTRINITY COUNTY TRANSMISSION LINES HAZARD TREE REMOVAL AND SALVAGE PROJECT
TRINITY COUNTY TRANSMISSION LINES HAZARD TREE REMOVAL AND SALVAGE PROJECT CONTENT ANALYSIS OF SCOPING COMMENTS / ISSUE DISPOSITION / ISSUE INDICATORS COMMENTS RECEIVED The Forest received two scoping letters
More informationEarly Scoping for Proposed Application for Incidental Take Permit and Habitat
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/12/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-26950, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 4310 55 DEPARTMENT OF THE
More informationTimber Sale Contract/Purpose and Need/Range of Alternatives
North Fork Mill Creek Revised Project Environmental Assessment (EA) Objection Statements and Responses Hood River and Barlow Ranger Districts Mt. Hood National Forest December 2014 Objectors Bark and Oregon
More informationIntroduction. Methodology for Analysis
Scenic Report Prepared by: /s/gary Kedish Natural Resources Specialist for: Warner Mountain Ranger District Modoc National Forest January 20, 2016 Introduction This report focuses on the Visual Quality
More informationGilbert Zepeda, Deputy Forest Supervisor
Forest Service Prescott National Forest 344 South Cortez Prescott, AZ 86303 Phone: (928) 443-8000 Fax: (928) 443-8008 TTY: (928) 443-8001 File Code: 1570/2710 Date: November 26, 2012 Route To: Subject:
More informationApplying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting
Applying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting Nikola Smith Ecologist and Ecosystem Services Specialist U.S. Forest Service Port Orford City Hall February 2, 2017
More informationLogo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 196 East Tabernacle Suite 40 St. George, UT Agriculture
Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Dixie National Forest 196 East Tabernacle Suite 40 Department of Service Pine Valley Ranger District St. George,
More informationDNRC LOLO LAND EXCHANGE EA Visual Resource/Scenery Report
DNRC LOLO LAND EXCHANGE EA Visual Resource/Scenery Report CHAPTER III --AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Forest Plan Direction The Lolo National Forest Plan provides overall direction for scenic quality on the forest.
More informationPRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO
2016 PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO In southwest Idaho, public land managers work to: address public health and safety concerns; treat insect and disease infestations; reduce the risk of severe wildfires
More informationLakeview Stewardship CFLRP Work Plan 2012
Responses to the prompts on this work plan should be typed directly into this template 1. Describe the manner in which the proposal will be implemented to achieve ecological and community economic benefit,
More informationCHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 304-456-3335 CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT USDA Forest
More informationMARTIN BASIN RANGELAND
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Santa Rosa Ranger District RECORD OF DECISION FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
More informationFor the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:
Timber Management Plan For the property described as: Property Owner: Name Phone Number Mailing Address City State Zip Report Year: (This template is provided to assist Cherokee County land owners who
More informationOchoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains
[3410-11- P] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Ochoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains Forest Resiliency Project AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. ACTION:
More information