STATE OF THE WATERSHED Annual Newsletter of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association December 2013
|
|
- Brent Hawkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATE OF THE WATERSHED Annual Newsletter of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association December 2013 Volume 15 Big Dry Creek 2012 Water Quality Review Inside this issue: A key focus of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association (BDCWA) is annual assessment of water quality conditions in Big Dry Creek. In the spring of each year, BDCWA uploads the results of the instream water quality monitoring program into a longterm water quality database and compares the results to applicable water quality standards for Big Dry Creek. Findings are documented in an annual water quality report that is presented and discussed at the March BDCWA public meeting and then posted to the BDCWA website. This brief article highlights some of the key findings of the 2013 water quality analysis, which included samples collected and analyzed during 2012 by staff from the City and County of Broomfield and the Cities of Northglenn, Thornton, and Westminster. In 2012, water quality samples were collected and analyzed for a variety of constituents. Metals were monitored on a quarterly basis with the exception of selenium, which was monitored monthly. All other constituents were monitored on a monthly basis. The Cities and BDCWA also fund operation of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gauging station at Westminster behind Front Range Community College. Key findings and recommendations regarding Big Dry Creek water quality and aquatic life conditions based on analysis of the 2012 data set include: Water quality in Big Dry Creek attained stream standards for currently assigned stream standards, with the exception of E. coli. (Continued on page 2) Big Dry Creek 2012 Water Quality Review CLEAN Center Underway at Colorado State University The Great Flood of Macroinvertebrate Data and MMI Analysis BMW Urban Waters Grant Campaign Broomfield Awarded $1 Million Grant What is the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association? All Watershed Association general membership meetings are open to the public Meetings are generally held on a quarterly basis in March, May, September and December. For More Information on the Next Watershed Meeting, contact Jane Clary: or visit our website: The Big Dry Creek Watershed Association is a 501(c)(3) corporation. Big Dry Creek in November 2012 near Thorncreek Golf Course.
2 2 State of the Watershed: Newsletter of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association (Big Dry Creek 2012 Water Quality Review, Continued from page 1) Big Dry Creek did not meet the E. coli standard during 2012 using current Colorado Water Quality Control Division (CWQCD) assessment procedures, which assess attainment on a bimonthly interval. E. coli exceeds the stream standard during all bimonthly intervals except November- December. When considering the last fiveyear period, the standard is attained during the non-recreation season, but exceeded during the recreation season (May-June, July-August and September-October intervals). A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) process has been initiated by the CWQCD and EPA for Big Dry Creek with regard to E. coli. BDCWA is working cooperatively with the CWQCD and EPA to ensure that the most complete and scientifically sound data set and assumptions are used in this process. Special studies related to sources of E. coli in the watershed were conducted by Wright Water Engineers and BDCWA during 2007 and 2008 and provided to the CWQCD. A draft TMDL is anticipated during For the most recent 5-year analysis period ( ), Big Dry Creek attained its sitespecific selenium standard for both the irrigation and non-irrigation seasons; however, the stream is currently listed on the (d) list of impaired waters for selenium. Based on review of the historic data set, Big Dry Creek is expected to cycle on and off of the 303(d) List, unless the site-specific standard is adjusted to allow a margin for year-to-year variability based on natural conditions and irrigation release patterns from Standley Lake. Big Dry Creek does not attain the interim warm water instream nitrogen and phosphorus values adopted by the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission (CWQCC) in Although these values would not be expected to be adopted as stream standards for Big Dry Creek for 10 years or more, ad- (Continued on page 3)
3 State of the Watershed: Newsletter of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association 3 (Continued from page 2) dressing nutrient sources on Big Dry Creek should be an increasing area of focus for BDCWA. Phosphorus concentrations and loads to Big Dry Creek are decreasing due to enhanced treatment processes at the Broomfield and Westminster WWTPs, along with reuse programs that continue to be implemented at these WWTPs. (See figure below.) Despite these substantial operational improvements, the stream would not meet the Regulation 31 interim total phosphorus values from I-25 to the confluence with the South Platte River. Big Dry Creek currently attains aquatic life uses, based on calculation of MMI scores in accordance with CWQCC s Aquatic Life Use Attainment Policy Scores were calculated at six biological monitoring locations for fall monitoring conducted during 2008, 2010, and MMI scores vary substantially, both temporally and spatially. (See page 6 for more information.) Average streamflows during 2012 were among the lowest in the period of record for both stream gages on Big Dry Creek. In February 2013, the Big Dry Creek Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) was updated to facilitate compliance with the Regulation 85 nutrient monitoring requirements, which include increased instream monitoring relative to WWTP Properly disposing of pet waste is an easy way to help to reduce bacteria loading to Big Dry Creek. discharges. Changes to the monitoring program include analyses for total Kjeldahl nitrogen to enable calculation of total nitrogen, as well as additional analysis of flow for purposes of estimating instream nutrient loads upstream and downstream of WWTP discharges. Changes to the field QC program for nutrients have also been implemented in the 2013 SAP. For a complete copy of the 2012 Annual Report, see Estimated Big Dry Creek Total Phosphorus Load for Big Dry Creek Declining Over Time Near the Confluence with the South Platte River
4 4 State of the Watershed: Newsletter of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association CLEAN Center Underway at Colorado State University In 2013, BDCWA provided a letter of support for a Colorado State University (CSU) led effort to develop a solution-oriented nutrient center (CLEAN Center) under a major EPA STAR grant program. CLEAN stands for Center for Comprehensive, Optimal and Effective Abatement of Nutrients. EPA selected CSU to lead a multistakeholder effort to study and control the sources of excess nutrients in wastewater, stormwater, agricultural water, and natural systems. The Center activities will connect natural and physical systems, human actions, and policy to create innovative solutions to nutrient pollution problems. Sustainable nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) management solutions for restoring watershed systems and attaining designated uses will be developed and demonstrated. These sustainable solutions will integrate abatement strategies for urban, agricultural, and riparian systems, and effective policy instruments (incentives and market-based approaches) that facilitate trading among sectors, provide equity along water systems, increase chance of adoption, and minimize costs. The mission of the CLEAN center is to create knowledge, build capacity, and forge collaboration to develop and demonstrate sustainable solutions for reduction of nutrient pollution in the nation's water resources. BDCWA will look forward to participating in the CLEAN Center efforts as the project moves forward. Key projects planned by CSU and its partners include: Understand the Physical System: Project 1: Achieving Nutrient Reductions through Innovative Approaches for Wastewater Management and Water Demand Reduction Project 2: Urban Stormwater Management- Evaluation of Simple Retrofits/Design Enhancements and Development of Simple Assessment Tools Project 3: Nutrient Reductions in Agricultural Watersheds: Intentional Planning, Implementation, and Maintenance Project 4: Fluvial Instability and Riparian Degradation: Evaluating and Reducing Nutrient Loading from Channel-Riparian Interfaces Understand People and Policy: Project 5: Effective Incentives and Viable Trans- Sectoral Trading Strategies Enhance the Decision Making Process: Project 6: Accessible Nutrient Data, Analysis and Modeling Dashboard for the Nation Project 7: Assessing Nutrient Management Tradeoff and Targets under Uncertainty For more information on the CLEAN Center, see 20Overview.pdf.
5 State of the Watershed: Newsletter of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association 5 The Great Flood of 2013 Colorado Boulevard crossing at Big Dry Creek below the Union Pacific Railroad during the September 2013 flood. In September 2013, Coloradoans were reminded of the power of nature during a multi-day rainfall event. Communities along Big Dry Creek experienced significant damage to road infrastructure, businesses, homes, and agricultural lands. HDSC maps can be accessed at aep_storm_analysis/8_colorado_2013.pdf. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration s National Weather Service Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center (HDSC) developed maps showing annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs) of the worst case rainfall for the Colorado event that started on September 9, The AEP is the probability of exceeding a given amount of rainfall at least once in any given year at a given location. It is an indicator of the rarity of amounts of rainfall and is used as the basis of hydrologic design and regulation. The multiday storm event delivered total rainfall amounts that exceeded 15 inches in some locations as it slowly moved through the area and caused extensive river flooding (HDSC 2013). The HDSC map series shows areas that experienced rainfall magnitudes with AEPs ranging from 1/10 (10%) to smaller than 1/1000 (0.1% ) for 24- hour, 48-hour, and 7-day durations, respectively. Portions of the Big Dry Creek watershed experienced rainfall with an AEP of less than 0.1% for these rainfall durations. A complete set of the
6 6 State of the Watershed: Newsletter of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association 2012 Macroinvertebrate Data and MMI Analysis The Big Dry Creek Watershed Association (BDCWA) sponsors biannual biological monitoring on Big Dry Creek, which includes both fish and macroinvertebrates (bugs) at six long-term monitoring sites on Big Dry Creek. These monitoring locations include sites in the Westminster Open Space upstream of municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharges, below WWTP discharges and locations in the agricultural portion of Weld County. The monitoring program has been conducted for BDCWA by Aquatics Associates since In 2010, the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission (CWQCC) adopted Policy 10-1, which provides for the evaluation of the biotic integrity of streams through use of a multi-metric index (MMI) calibrated for the State of Colorado. The policy established aquatic life use-attainment thresholds for three separate stream biotypes, which include Transition (Biotype 1), Mountain (Biotype 2), and Plains & Xeric (Biotype 3). The Big Dry Creek study sites are all designated as Biotype 3. The thresholds for Biotype 3 streams are MMI >37 for use attainment and MMI <22 for impairment. MMI scores >44 for Biotype 3 streams indicate a high scoring water (HSW) and any drop in HSW scores of 22 points or more for samples collected 12 or more months apart within a 5-year span of time may indicate impairment. Failure to meet use attainment thresholds for streams in their particular biotype may result in the affected segment(s) being listed as provisionally impaired for aquatic life on the 303(d) List. BDCWA s biannual macroinvertebrate monitoring program provides data appropriate for calculation of MMI scores and assessment of aquatic life use attainment in accordance with Policy Results of the MMI analyses for the macroinvertebrate samples collected at the six BDC sites in the fall of 2008, 2010, and 2012 are shown in the figure below. All samples for the three years met or were better than the impairment threshold of MMI >22 (22.1 or higher), and over the three sampling years, no consistent upward or downward trends were noted. Over the three sampling years, 12 of the 18 total samples collected were classified as HSW with MMIs >44. Based on the MMI results for the six sampling sites for the three most recent years analyzed, the aquatic macroinvertebrate community in Big Dry Creek is generally healthy and meets MMI useattainment criteria for aquatic life in Class 2 warm water streams. Red lines bracket the attainment and impairment thresholds under Policy (higher scores indicate better aquatic health).
7 State of the Watershed: Newsletter of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association 7 BMW Urban Waters Grant Campaign The Big Dry Creek Watershed Association participates in regional collaborative efforts to improve water quality. One such regional effort is a new water quality campaign initiated by the Barr Milton Watershed Association (BMW). In June of 2012, BMW received a grant from EPA to bring together water interests in the Denver Metro area to develop and test clean water messages. Over the past 15 months, BMW grant partners have met seven times. Starting with a review of surveys conducted by the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the Greenway Foundation/PURE effort, along with conducting five focus groups, a baseline of current water awareness was established. Among the conclusions of the surveys and focus groups are: Water quality is not on the public s radar. People are willing to participate in keeping water clean once they re aware there is a problem. The trusted messenger for water quality messages are water quality professionals and environmental/conservation groups. Working with the grant partners, messages about changing two behaviors to protect water quality have Logo for water quality educational campaign developed under the Urban Waters Grant. been developed. The behaviors are picking up after your dog and using phosphorus free fertilizer on lawns. Equipped with baseline information and a focus on just two behaviors, BMW hired a marketing firm to develop a logo, tagline and messages. The messages are in draft form and currently in the testing phase. Contact Amy Conklin at amy.conklin@comcast.net for a presentation of the messaging materials or for more information. Broomfield Awarded $1 Million Grant In 2012, the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission (CWQCC) adopted Regulation 85, Nutrients Management Control, which requires larger domestic wastewater treatment facilities to meet more stringent effluent limits for nutrients. Following the establishment of CWQCC Regulation 85 and understanding the financial impact that the new standards were going to place on larger communities, the Colorado General Assembly passed HB , Nutrients Grant Fund, to provide grant funding assistance for communities that are subject to WQCC Regulation 85. In July 2013, Broomfield applied for and received a design and construction grant for WWTP improvements based on findings from a nutrient treatment and optimization study that was conducted at the facility in early 2013 by Tetra Tech. The study determined that Broomfield could achieve the CWQCC Regulation 85 nutrient standards through additional capital improvements totaling approximately $4 million. The additional improvements include: Constructing a gravity thickener for primary sludge treatment; Replacing existing multi-stage centrifugal blowers with new frictionless high-speed turbo blowers to regulate air flow rates; and Installing additional piping to improve process recirculation. Under the grant, Broomfield will be completing the permitting, engineering design, construction, and startup of the new treatment processes by May 31, 2016.
8 What is the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association? The Big Dry Creek Watershed Association (BDCWA) is a non-profit corporation consisting of individuals and entities who dedicate time and resources to developing a sound scientific understanding of water quality, flow, aquatic life and habitat conditions in the Big Dry Creek watershed and act to improve these conditions. The Big Dry Creek Partnership, which included the City and County of Broomfield, the Cities of Northglenn and Westminster, and Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS), founded the BDCWA in These entities have been heavily involved in monitoring stream conditions for many years. Since 1997, the Association has expanded to include representatives from other cities, counties, farmers, ditch companies, citizens and regulatory and resource agencies. The BDCWA is open to those interested in cooperatively working towards understanding and prioritizing efforts to improve basin conditions. In 2004, the BDCWA formed a non-profit corporation with a Board of Directors currently consisting of representatives of the Cities of Westminster and Northglenn, the City and County of Broomfield, Weld County and Adams County. Activities of the BDCWA during the last fifteen years have been funded through the contributions from these entities, as well as the City of Thornton, U.S. Department of Energy, the Woman Creek Reservoir Authority, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s 319 program (as administered by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment) and the Regional Geographic Initiative grant program. For more information on the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association, please visit the BDCWA s web page at or contact Jane Clary, Watershed Coordinator, Wright Water Engineers, Inc., or clary@wrightwater.com. Big Dry Creek Watershed Association c/o Wright Water Engineers, Inc W. 26th Ave., Suite 100A Denver, CO Phone: Fax: clary@wrightwater.com
Sustaining Colorado s Watersheds: Making the Water Quality Connections October 2-4, 2007
Sustaining Colorado s Watersheds: Making the Water Quality Connections October 2-4, 2007 Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan ~ Brief History of the Reservoirs ~ Overview of the BMW
More informationTOOLS FOR MS4s: REGULATIONS FOR E. COLI
INTRODUCTION Fecal indicator bacteria, such as E. coli (Escherichia coli), are used to determine whether streams and lakes are suitable for recreational use. Most E. coli bacteria are harmless, occur naturally
More informationPerspectives from the Regulated Community Regarding E. coli in Colorado Waters
Perspectives from the Regulated Community Regarding E. coli in Colorado Waters Prepared by Jim McCarthy, City of Arvada and Jane Clary, Wright Water Engineers, Inc. September 2011 Based on Work Completed
More informationB4N BMW TMDL MIRL. CLRMA Annual Fall Conference. Barr Lake & Milton Reservoir Watershed Association
B4N BMW TMDL MIRL CLRMA Annual Fall Conference Nov. 16th, 2011 Barr Lake & Milton Reservoir Watershed Association History Watershed (datashed) Population: o 2.5 Million (1 in 2 Coloradoans) 850 Sq. Miles
More information4. Present Activities and Roles
4. Present Activities and Roles The present missions, authorities, activities and roles of the various agencies involved with flood protection, floodplain management and flood-damage reduction are identified
More informationLower Boise River Implementation Plan Total Phosphorus
Lower Boise River Implementation Plan Total Phosphorus Final Lower Boise Watershed Council and the Department of Environmental Quality July 2008 Executive Summary The Idaho Department of Environmental
More informationGlobeville Landing Outfall Surface Water. December 12, 2017 Andrew Ross, Jon Novick Denver Department of Public Health & Environment
Globeville Landing Outfall Surface Water December 12, 2017 Andrew Ross, Jon Novick Denver Department of Public Health & Environment Introductions Andrew Ross Environmental Program Manager, DDPHE Jon Novick
More informationCommunicating Models to Stakeholders. Nikki Dictson Texas Water Resources Institute
Communicating Models to Stakeholders Nikki Dictson Texas Water Resources Institute Communicating to Stakeholders Throughout the process, there is a continuous need to inform, engage, and motivate water
More informationFountain Creek Watershed Water Quality Overview. Fountain Creek Watershed Citizen Advisory Committee June 12, 2015
Fountain Creek Watershed Water Quality Overview Fountain Creek Watershed Citizen Advisory Committee June 12, 2015 Outline Fountain Creek Watershed Strategic Plan - 2009 Regulatory standards and classifications
More informationEstablishing Environmental Flows for California Streams. Eric Stein Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Establishing Environmental Flows for California Streams Eric Stein Southern California Coastal Water Research Project What Do We Know About the Status of Flows Statewide? First comprehensive study recently
More informationSabine River Basin Big Sandy Creek Watershed Characterization Report 2015
67. Big Sandy Big Sandy Creek at White Oak Road Station 16011 Sabine River Basin Big Sandy Creek Watershed Characterization Report 2015 Prepared in Cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental
More informationPROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS
PROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS Public Information Meeting ~ May 2, 2018 Public Works Stormwater Management Division OVERVIEW Surface Water Quality Protection Municipal
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Project Summary. Background
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Summary In 1998 one reach of Crow Creek was listed as impaired by the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and placed on the Clean Water Act (CWA), Section 303(d)
More information2010, 2012, 2016, and 2018 Integrated Reports Classified Use Support Evaluation. Compiled, Evaluated, and Written by R. W.
2010, 2012, 2016, and 2018 Integrated Reports Classified Use Support Evaluation Compiled, Evaluated, and Written by R. W. Parachini December 2018 1 2010, 2012, 2016, and 2018 Integrated Reports Classified
More informationSECTION 10 WATER QUALITY
SECTION 10 WATER QUALITY 10.1 General Local ordinances in the Caldwell County political subdivisions regarding water quality and quantity issues are minimal. The county does not have authority to create,
More informationU.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
Evaluation of stream quality and relations between stream biological conditions and environmental variables in urbanizing watersheds of northeastern Kansas Teresa Rasmussen, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence,
More informationStatus of Water Quality in Ohio: The 2018 Integrated Report. April 25, 2018
Status of Water Quality in Ohio: The 2018 Integrated Report April 25, 2018 Today s Topics Overview of the 2018 Integrated Report Purpose and requirements Assessment overview Differences from the 2016 Integrated
More informationBrown s Creek Impaired Biota TMDL Phase II
PROJECT WORKPLAN TMDL Summary and Cover Sheet Project Name: Brown s Creek Impaired Biota TMDL Phase II Project and Budget Period: Project Sponsor: November 1, 2007 August 31, 2009 Project Representatives:
More informationFact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality
Fact Sheet Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Water quality is a critical measure of the Chesapeake Bay s health. For the Bay to be healthy and productive, the water must be safe for people and must support
More informationAgencies and Organizations Involved with Hot Springs Village Water Issues September, 2010
Agencies and Organizations Involved with Hot Springs Village Water Issues September, 2010 PC&C - Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission PC&C is the environmental policy making body for Arkansas.
More informationSTREAM FUNCTION INDEX SUMMARY. Addendum to the Salt Lake Countywide
STREAM FUNCTION INDEX SUMMARY Addendum to the Salt Lake Countywide Water Quality Stewardship Plan Comments? Let us know! Salt Lake County Watershed Planning & Restoration Program Flood Control & Water
More information2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision. October 19, 2017 PA Phase III WIP Steering Committee Meeting
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 19, 2017 PA Phase III WIP Steering Committee Meeting Today s Objectives Highlight of key midpoint assessment policy decisions to be considered by the
More informationCLEAN WATER PLAN Policies, Assessments and Management Programs
METRO VISION 2020 CLEAN WATER PLAN Policies, Assessments and Management Programs June 17, 1998 Incorporating amendments through January, 2006 Denver Regional Council of Governments 4500 Cherry Creek Drive
More informationWatershed master planning, City of Griffin, Georgia, USA
Water Resources Management VII 3 Watershed master planning, City of Griffin, Georgia, USA J. K. Kaplan & B. J. Watson Tetra Tech, Water Resources Group, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Abstract Tetra Tech has assisted
More informationCHAPTER 3 FLOOD RELATED STUDIES
CHAPTER 3 FLOOD RELATED STUDIES Although the area has experienced regular flooding there have been few formal flood studies until more recently. There are a number of water quality studies in the basins.
More informationOtter Creek Watershed TMDL Project. Stakeholder Meeting June 6, 2013
Otter Creek Watershed TMDL Project Stakeholder Meeting June 6, 2013 1 Meeting Purpose Meet with watershed & technical advisory group members and watershed landowners to provide basic Otter Creek TMDL project
More informationDetail on Concentrate Handling and Disposal Options
Detail on Concentrate Handling and Disposal Options A number of options are available for disposing of concentrate including direct disposal as well as additional handling and/or treatment designed to
More informationUnify efforts to address water resources for the Big Sky area and surrounding zone of influence in three co-equal water resources focus areas:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum (Water Forum) is a community-based, collaborative approach building a unified vision for future Big Sky water resources management to maintain
More informationPast Studies in the Clearwater River Watershed. Past Studies MPCA Lost River Investigation. Past Studies Clearwater River Nonpoint Study
Past Studies in the Clearwater River Watershed March 2007 Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting Clearwater Nonpoint Study Biological studies Wild rice paddy water quality Clearwater Lake Water Quality Model
More informationSHORELINE INVENTORY AND RESTORATION PLANNING
CHAPTER 3 SHORELINE INVENTORY AND RESTORATION PLANNING A. PURPOSE OF THE SHORELINE INVENTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION A first step in the comprehensive Master Program update process is development of a shoreline
More informationChesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Reducing Pollution Indicators Updated May 2018
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Reducing Pollution Indicators Updated May 2018 Indicator Title: Reducing Pollution Relevant Outcome(s): 2017 Watershed Implementation Plans
More informationThe Geronimo and Alligator Creeks Watershed Protection Plan. Ward Ling Texas A&M AgriLife Extension
The Geronimo and Alligator Creeks Watershed Protection Plan Ward Ling Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Water Quality Geronimo Creek was listed on the 2006 303(d) list for not supporting its contact recreation
More informationWhich Data Are Important And Why? Barry Tonning Tetra Tech
Which Data Are Important And Why? Barry Tonning Tetra Tech Last week... In-stream monitoring parameters Chemical, physical, biological Including in-stream habitat parameters Bank area assessment Vegetation,
More informationAppendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution
Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution Sources Nonpoint source of pollution, unlike pollution from industrial and sewage treatment plants, comes from many different sources. Nonpoint source pollution is
More informationAppendix D Monitoring Program
Appendix D Monitoring Program [This page left intentionally blank.] Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan Monitoring Program Minnesota
More informationFinal TMDL Implementation Plan. Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Wirth Lake Final TMDL Implementation Plan Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency September 2010 4700 West 77 th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: (952) 832-2600 Fax: (952) 832-2601 wq-iw11-03c
More informationA History of Water Reuse in Colorado
A History of Water Reuse in Colorado Wayne Lorenz, P.E. Wright Water Engineers, Inc. WateReuse Symposium September 15, 2013 Reuse Drivers Growth & Development Water Rights Trans-Basin Water Disposal of
More informationMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Municipal Division Municipal Wastewater Section
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Municipal Division Municipal Wastewater Section Pre-Total Maximum Daily Load Phosphorus Trading Permitting Strategy June 24, 2008 ISSUE STATEMENT Minnesota Pollution
More informationClean Water SRF WATER RESOURCE RESTORATION Sponsored Projects. APPLICATION COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST September 2014
Clean Water SRF WATER RESOURCE RESTORATION Sponsored Projects APPLICATION COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST September 2014 Pre-application consultation held _January 15 th, 2015_ (date) Hard copy and CD containing
More informationJordan River TMDL Update
Jordan River TMDL Update 2010 Watershed Symposium August 4 th, 2010 Hilary N. Arens Utah Division of Water Quality Jordan River TMDL Outline What is a TMDL and what is the Jordan impaired for? Evaluation
More informationGrants Pass Water Quality Monitoring
Grants Pass Water Quality Monitoring 2003-2005 Rogue Valley Council of Governments April 2005 Rogue Valley Council of Governments Natural Resources Department 155 North First Street Central Point, Oregon
More informationBeaver Lake Nutrient Criteria
Beaver Lake Nutrient Criteria Tate Wentz Aquatic Ecologist Coordinator-Research and Field Programs Office of Water Quality-Planning Branch Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality 501-682-0661 Beaver
More informationJordan River Basin. Planning for the Future. Salt Lake County Watershed Symposium (August 11, 2011) Todd Stonely Utah Division of Water Resources
Jordan River Basin Planning for the Future Todd Stonely Utah Division of Water Resources Salt Lake County Watershed Symposium (August 11, 2011) 8/12/2011 Jordan River Basin Planning for the Future Slide
More informationColorado s Water Plan Reuse White Paper
Colorado s Water Plan Reuse White Paper The Gap Colorado faces a challenge in determining how to meet the future water demands of a rapidly growing population. Many stakeholders, with assistance from the
More informationMonitoring Plan. The following section provides information related to:
Monitoring Plan This section summarizes monitoring efforts included in the Watershed Protection Plan. Much like the Watershed Protection Plan in general, the Monitoring plan is comprised of efforts from
More informationStorm Water Resource Plan Criteria and Metrics Checklist
APPENDIX F Storm Water Resource Plan Criteria and Metrics Checklist Prepared for: San Diego Regional Storm Water Copermittee County of San Diego Department of Public County of San Diego, Department of
More informationVancouver Watershed Health Assessment. Burnt Bridge Creek Watershed
Vancouver Watershed Health Assessment Burnt Bridge Creek Watershed Presentation Overview 1. Introduction 2. Study Context 3. Burnt Bridge Creek Monitoring Program and Trend Analysis 4. Watershed Health
More informationMS4 MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.
MS4 MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. MS4 permit holders must report on the status of compliance with permit conditions, including a summary of any information
More informationMARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD 21230 410-537-3000 1-800-633-6101 Martin O Malley Governor Anthony G. Brown Lieutenant Governor November 6, 2009 Shari T. Wilson
More informationSTRATEGIC PLAN FY 2018 FY 2019
STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2018 FY 2019 This Strategic Plan is a blueprint for ANRC as we continue to work to manage and protect Arkansas s abundant natural resources. The plan reflects ANRC s commitment to build
More informationChapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 1 Introduction James P. Heaney, Robert Pitt, and Richard Field Introduction Stormwater has traditionally been considered a nuisance, requiring rapid and complete drainage from areas of habitation.
More informationManagement Objectives and Targets
Management Objectives and Targets As part of the Yampa River Stream Management Plan, the community of Steamboat Springs developed management objectives for the reach of the Yampa River near Steamboat Springs.
More informationReservoir age, increasing human population,
B-6249 02/12 Eagle Mountain Watershed Management Brent Clayton, Justin Mechell, David Waidler and Clint Wolfe* Reservoir age, increasing human population, and changing land uses have prompted the development
More informationWWOA Annual Conference October 6, John Kennedy. Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District Cleaning Water Today For Tomorrow s Generations
WWOA Annual Conference October 6, 2011 John Kennedy Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District Cleaning Water Today For Tomorrow s Generations Lower Green Bay and Fox River Examples of Water Resource Degradation
More informationDecentralized Wastewater Treatment in Texas Watersheds
Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in Texas Watersheds Bruce Lesikar Texas A&M University System Overview Surface water resources Water Quality Standards Watershed Management Programs Identifying Sources
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS University of Wyoming Office of Water Programs Water Research Program FY2018
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS University of Wyoming Office of Water Programs Water Research Program FY2018 The Office of Water Programs/Water Research Program welcomes proposals covering a wide range of topics
More informationColorado E. coli Toolbox: A Practical Guide for MS4s
Colorado E. coli Toolbox: A Practical Guide for MS4s Jane Clary, Wright Water Engineers Brandon Steets, P.E., Geosyntec Consultants Sponsored by Urban Drainage and Flood Control District City and County
More informationCity of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Annual Public Meeting. June 11, 2018
City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Annual Public Meeting June 11, 2018 Why is Water Quality Important? Water has always been important to Minnesota and is a key part of our history,
More information10-Year Water Quality Roadmap and Nutrients Reduction Voluntary Incentive Program. December 14, 2017
10-Year Water Quality Roadmap and Nutrients Reduction Voluntary Incentive Program December 14, 2017 History of Nutrients Management in Colorado 2 We have been working on this for a 1998: USEPA develops
More informationAppendix 2 Screening of Keewatinoow Construction Camp Waste Water Effluent Discharge to Creek Fourteen
Appendix 2 Screening of Keewatinoow Construction Camp Waste Water Effluent Discharge to Creek Fourteen Prepared by: North/South Consultants Inc. July 19, 2011 Introduction The following provides a screening
More informationMONITORING AND EVALUATION
MONITORING AND EVALUATION Introduction Successful resource management can only be achieved if adequate data and information are available to make educated management decisions. Monitoring and data collection
More informationCity of Albany, Oregon. Willamette Basin TMDL Implementation Plan
City of Albany, Oregon Willamette Basin TMDL Implementation Plan July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND... 1 LOCATION IN THE WATERSHED... 1 SCOPE AND SUMMARY OF TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN...
More informationJanuary 27, Status Report of NC s Nutrient Criteria Implementation Plan and Supporting Documentation
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Dee Freeman, Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Coleen H. Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality Ms. Joanne Benante Ms. Annie Godfrey
More informationSummary of Presentation
Water Quality Standards Program Florida s Numeric Nutrient Criteria Presentation for Wastewater Breakout Session of the 2015 Focus on Change Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Summary
More informationMaitland Valley WATERSHED
Maitland Valley WATERSHED Report Card 2018 Maitland Conservation has prepared this report card as a summary of the state of your forests, wetlands, and water resources. WHERE ARE WE? We are one of 36 Conservation
More informationPINEY RUN WATERSHED 2005 PROFILE
PINEY RUN WATERSHED 25 PROFILE Table of Contents Page Watershed Description Water Quality Studies Stream Monitoring Water Chemistry Conditions Water Bacteria Conditions Stream Habitat Conditions Aquatic
More informationOverview of Tiered Aquatic Life Uses (TALU)
www.pca.state.mn.us Overview of Tiered Aquatic Life Uses (TALU) 1. Background The Tiered Aquatic Life Uses, or TALU, framework is needed to modernize Minnesota s Class 2 water quality standards (WQS) from
More informationElin Betanzo July 14, 2015
Water Data to Answer Urgent Water Policy Questions: Harmful Algal Blooms, Agriculture, and Lake Erie Elin Betanzo July 14, 2015 Harmful Algal Blooms in Lake Erie Photo: NOAA Satellite Image What Causes
More informationOKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PUBLIC NOTICE. January 24, 2008 AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT BACTERIA TMDL FOR THE NEOSHO RIVER BASIN
Steve Thompson Executive Director OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Brad Henry Governor PUBLIC NOTICE January 24, 2008 AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT BACTERIA TMDL FOR THE NEOSHO RIVER BASIN REQUEST
More information1.1 MONITORING PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The major objectives of the Monitoring Program outlined in the Municipal Stormwater Permit are to:
1.1 MONITORING PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The major objectives of the Monitoring Program outlined in the Municipal Stormwater Permit are to: Assess compliance with the Los Angeles County Municipal Stormwater Permit
More informationSupport legislation that will protect the quantity of water in Lake Erie
Specific Regional Priorities Each of Pennsylvania s major drainage basins has an array of individual characteristics that distinguish it from other regions of the state. These include diverse geographic
More informationE. coli Workgroup Meeting Minutes. 1:00 3:00; May 8, 2008
E. coli Workgroup Meeting Minutes 1:00 3:00; May 8, 2008 Attendance: Jim McCarthy (City of Arvada), Nathan Moore and Becky Anthony (Water Quality Control Division), Terry Baus and Jon Novick (City and
More informationWatershed Management Area Recommendations for NJ Water Policy
Watershed Management Area Recommendations for NJ Water Policy Presenters: William Kibler, Director of Policy, Raritan Headwaters Association Bob Kecskes, Freelance Environmental Consultant, retired NJDEP
More informationMonday, January 9th, :00 pm. Montgomery Park, Lobby Conference Rooms
Monday, January 9th, 2016 6:00 pm Montgomery Park, Lobby Conference Rooms Purpose of This Meeting Provide General Information/Updates on 2016 IR and MD s TMDL Prioritization Encourage public dialogue,
More informationPresented by Jack Pflaumer
Presented by Jack Pflaumer Bureau of Environmental Analysis, Restoration and Standards Division of Water Monitoring and Standards New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection February 23, 2017 Agenda
More informationCUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS: A SIMPLE MODEL FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESERVOIRS AND WITHDRAWALS IN GEORGIA
CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS: A SIMPLE MODEL FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESERVOIRS AND WITHDRAWALS IN GEORGIA Nolton G. Johnson AUTHOR: Chief, Water Resources Branch, Georgia Environmental Protection Division,
More informationCOLORADO RIVER WATCH
COLORADO RIVER WATCH Colorado River Watch Water Quality Sampling Manual Version 9.17 Sponsored By: Colorado Parks and Wildlife http://cpw.state.co.us/aboutus/pages/riverwatch.aspx Earth Force https://earthforce.org/
More informationUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania /8/2009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 10/8/2009 Richard Eskin, Ph.D., Director Technical and Regulatory Service Administration
More informationWhat is a TMDL? MWEA NPDES Permit Compliance Seminar. December 2, 2009
What is a TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load is an estimate of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a water body can receive and still meet water quality standards, and an allocation of that amount to the
More informationThe Lake Maumelle watershed
Source Water Protection Central Arkansas: Programs & Practices Martin Maner, PE and Trevor Clements Implementing Adaptive Management in Central Arkansas Introduction The Lake Maumelle watershed in central
More informationWater Quality Control Commission Policy 98-1
Implementation Guidance for Determining Sediment Deposition Impacts to Aquatic Life in streams and Rivers (as intended for higher gradient, cobble-bed, coarse-grained streams) Water Quality Control Commission
More informationPresented by: City of Dallas Trinity Watershed Management Stormwater Management
Presented by: City of Dallas Trinity Watershed Management Stormwater Management Agenda StormwaterProgram Water Quality Monitoring Water Quality Trends Outreach Efforts TX Stream Team Volunteer Program
More informationMunicipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates VNH File No.
Municipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates 2005 VNH File No. 35317-210-21 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Goals... 3 Storm water Discussion...
More informationKlamath Hydroelectric Project Interim Measure 11 Study Activities for 2018
Introduction Final Study Plan, Part 2 Klamath Hydroelectric Project Interim Measure 11 Study Activities for 2018 July 17, 2018 The Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement (KHSA; as amended on April
More informationImpacts of Rainfall Events on Water Quality in the Houston Metro Area
Impacts of Rainfall Events on Water Quality in the Houston Metro Area Hanadi Rifai and Anuradha Desai Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Houston, Houston, TX Acknowledgments TCEQ EPA Houston
More informationDEVELOPING A WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT PLAN TO MEET MULTIPLE COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES IN GAINESVILLE AND HALL COUNTY, GEORGIA
DEVELOPING A WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT PLAN TO MEET MULTIPLE COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES IN GAINESVILLE AND HALL COUNTY, GEORGIA Chrissy, Thom 1, David Dockery 2, Kevin McInturff 3, Betsy Massie 1, and Lauren Murphy
More informationTools to Improve Water Quality
Tools to Improve Water Quality SARA Water Quality Modeling Tool Development Client: San Antonio River Authority (SARA) Firm: Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. Category A: Studies, Research and Consulting
More information5. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
Central Orange County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan 5. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 5.1 STRATEGIES INAPPLICABLE TO REGION Nearly all types of resource management strategies are applicable
More informationWhat Are Environmental (Instream) Flows?
1 What Are Environmental (Instream) Flows? Sustainable water management requires that both human needs and the needs of aquatic and riparian ecosystems be fulfilled. Dams and diversion of water for municipal
More informationBackground What is the Integrated Report (IR)? CWA Background
Department of the Environment Monday, September 8th, 2014 6:00 pm Montgomery Park, Lobby Conference Rooms Purpose of This Meeting Provide General Information/Updates on 2014 IR Encourage public dialogue,
More informationUnderstanding Agriculture And Clean Water
1 IOWA CHAPTER Understanding Agriculture And Clean Water Clean Water Act Established in 1972, the Clean Water Act (CWA) created the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into water bodies
More informationWater Quality Control Commission Policy Voluntary Incentive Program for Early Nutrient Reductions
Water Quality Control Commission Policy 17-1 Voluntary Incentive Program for Early Nutrient Reductions Regulation #85 Section 85.5(1.5) Approved: October 10, 2017 Expires: December 31, 2020 Table of Contents
More information2012 Nutrient Regulations Update
2012 Nutrient Regulations Update OWEA Government Affairs Workshop March 1, 2012 Guy Jamesson, PE, BCEE Malcolm Pirnie, The Water Division of ARCADIS Imagine the result Agenda Nutrient impacts Nutrient
More informationHoosier Creek Watershed All of Ely drains into Hoosier Creek, which runs north to south along the west side of Ely. Hoosier Creek, Hydrologic Unit Cod
Hoosier Creek Watershed All of Ely drains into Hoosier Creek, which runs north to south along the west side of Ely. Hoosier Creek, Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 8 07080208, drains into the Coralville Reservoir,
More informationThe City of Cocoa (City) is located in east
FWRJ Reclaimed Water and Stormwater: A Perfect Pair to Meet Total Maximum Daily Load Wasteload Allocations? Danielle Honour, James Wittig, John A. Walsh, and Don Stevens Danielle Honour, P.E., D.WRE, and
More informationMiddle Huron Stormwater Plan for Addressing Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)
Middle Huron Stormwater Plan for Addressing Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) The following plan was developed by the Middle Huron Watershed Stormwater Advisory Group (SAG) a collaboration between communities
More information2 USCID/EWRI Conference
1 X 2 USCID/EWRI Conference x Water Quality of Surface Irrigation Returns in Southern Idaho Clarence W. Robison 1 Richard G. Allen 2 Richard Merkle 3 ABSTRACT The Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water
More informationJordan River Watershed Council. Salt Lake County; Public Works Department Engineering Division Water Resources Planning and Restoration Program
Jordan River Watershed Council Salt Lake County; Public Works Department Engineering Division Water Resources Planning and Restoration Program OUTLINE Background Information Jordan River Watershed Council
More informationF7 Stream Reach Summary
F7 Stream Reach Summary Study Reach: F7, Fraser River - Ranch Creek confluence downstream to Canyon below Strawberry Road. Reach Description: Approximate channel length: 1 ½ miles, approximate channel
More informationSelena Medrano Water Quality Management Planning
Selena Medrano Water Quality Management Planning Management Services Legal Fiscal Computer Public Outreach and Education Hazardous Waste Solid Waste Technical Services Mining Air Water Clean Water Act
More information