Quantifying Runoff Mitigation in STEP 4 Calculations with VFSMOD EU-Scenarios in SWAN 3.0
|
|
- Ashlee Jenkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Quantifying Runoff Mitigation in STEP 4 Calculations with VFSMOD EU-Scenarios in SWAN 3.0 Bjoern Roepke 6 th European Modelling Workshop, Paris 10 th 12 th June 2012
2 Existing Vegetated Filter Strip (VFS) Structures & Legislation in the EU EU policies facilitating VFS for risk reduction & ecosystem improvement Nutrient directive Sustainable use directive - pesticides Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) National action plans
3 Quantifying Runoff Mitigation Established width based factors Mechanistic VFS approach Key drivers hydrologic response (infiltration; sedimentation) & phase distribution of the chemical. VFSMOD-W can significantly improve prediction of pesticide trapping efficiency compared with field slope and buffer width In STEP 4 exposure assessments, SWAN- VFSMOD can be used to quantify VFS mitigation efficiency from: Reichenberger et al. (2006) from: Reichenberger et al. (2006) Average buffer strip efficiency: 50% for 5m 90% for 10m 97.5% for 20m Scatter indicates that other factors than VFS-width drive buffer efficiency from: Sabbagh et al.. (2009)
4 VFSMOD-W Model Development
5 VFS Key Drivers Hydrologic Response VFS are complex dynamic systems! Driving Mitigation Infiltration Is governed by soil physical properties; vegetative cover; antecedent moisture content; rainfall intensity and inflow; slope Hydraulic resistance Is a function of vegetation type; Inflow volume Compound Sorption coefficient
6 VFSMOD-W: Model to Describe Reduction in Pesticide Transfer Across a Vegetated Filter Strip Predicted vs. measured reductions in pesticide transfer across vegetated filter strips (Sabbagh et al., 2009): - development (n=47; left-hand figure) - evaluation (n=120; right-hand figure) datasets
7 Benchmarking VFS models Mean Error in Buffer Reduction Efficiency Paetzold study / Germany
8 EU Vegetated Filter Strip Scenarios for STEP 4 FOCUSsw calculations
9 CORPEN audit EU STEP4 VFSMOD Scenarios STEP 4 VFS Scenario Project Development of European VFS scenarios representative for the FOCUS R landscapes to be used to parameterize the vegetated filter strip model VFSMOD-W in STEP 4 PECsw calculations. Project successfully finished final report available! Project Contractors: University of York & FERA Colin Brown, Wendy van Beinum University of Piacenza Ettore Capri, Marco Trevisan, Matteo Balderacchi
10 Software Development FOCUS PRZM Edge-of- field runoff VFSMOD-W SWAN Interception in VFS FOCUS TOXSWA Fate in surface water Parameter requirements?
11 Sensitivity Analysis Sensitive parameters Soil Existing analysis based on field experiments reported in the literature Two soil types and six pesticides with a range of different properties Insensitive parameters Vegetation - saturated hydraulic conductivity - spacing of stems - saturated water content - height Sediment - average diameter of particles - organic carbon content - clay content - hydraulic resistance Muñoz-Carpena et al. (2010). JEQ 39:
12 Handling of insensitive vs. sensitive parameters Insensitive parameters; Assess likely range across the EU Propose default values relevant to the Step 3 scenarios Appropriate level of conservatism Documentation to justify selection from literature Sensitive parameters; GIS analysis within the framework of FOCUS Step 3 scenarios Generate distributions for each parameter Support selection of conservative values Facilitate higher-tier modelling (e.g. Probabilistic)
13 Probability distributions for Ksat R1 R2 R3 R4 N for each R scenario small Hydraulic parameters strongly correlated scenario n mean st.dev. R R R R Lognormal distribution k s as variable and area as density
14 Deriving conservative values for Ksat & θsat Separate simulations for: The four FOCUS R scenarios (n = ) Storm events with 30 mm rain over 1 hour or 8 hours Pesticides with Koc of 100 L/kg or 10,000 L/kg Each run reads Ksat, θsat and θfc for one soil unit θfc used as fixed (and correlated) input for initial water content All other parameters held at constant values relevant to the FOCUS R scenario
15 Percentile of the frequency distribution Efficiency in removing pesticide varies with properties of soil, pesticide and runoff event R % pesticide removal 8 hour event, Koc=10,000 8 hour event, Koc = hour event, Koc = 10,000 1 hour event, Koc = 100
16 90 th Percentile Worst-Case Values for Hydraulic Properties in the VFS Scenario Parameter R1 R2 R3 R4 K s (m s -1 ) 7.04 x x x x 10-6 θ s (cm 3 cm -3 ) θ fc (cm 3 cm -3 )
17 EU VFS Scenario Report Detailed methodology and results are published in Prof. Colin Brown et al s report
18 SWAN VFSMOD Development for Use in FOCUS STEP 4 Exposure Assessment
19 STEP4 SWAN&EU VFSMOD Scenarios New SWAN 3.0 feature: Conduct STEP 4 calculations with VFSMOD scenarios alternatively to L&M a) STEP4 with fixed 10 & 20m FOCUS L & M values b) Model buffer efficiency with VFSMOD (Prof. Munoz-Carpena) and VFS EU Scenarios for R1 R4 (Prof. Brown)
20 STEP 4 SWAN VFSMOD - Workflow From STEP3 read PRZM Outputs: ZTS and P2T 0 P2T Stream P2T Pond Apply Swash to: P2T Mitigation Run VFSMOD for each event & generate runoff volume, sediment mass & pesticide mass reduction factors Apply the mitigation factors to the P2T file (by event) generate P2T files Assumptions: 1 ha field with 100 m long buffer along the water body VFS parameterized according to respective EU VFS R scenario (Brown et al) FAO continuous moisture + mass conservation in VFS P2T Stream, Pond are based on SWAN algorithms
21 STEP 4 runoff mitigation with L&M Red = STEP3 no mitigation Blue line = STEP4 L&M L&M 20m
22 STEP 4 runoff mitigation with VFSMOD Red = no mitigation Blue = 5m buffer Green = 10m buffer 74% reduction (10m buffer, to max peak)
23 Testing VFSMOD-W Performance and Impact
24 Testing Strategy Two stage process; 1. Performance evaluation considering variation in effectiveness taking into account; Range of efate characteristics Range of rainfall / application timing conditions Differences in performance under a range of crop irrigation conditions 2. Technical testing Functionality tests for GUI Fidelity of response relative to pre-implementation datasets developed for performance evaluation in first stage testing
25 Test Datasets Basic performance test should consider; a range of e-fate characteristics (Koc ) a range of different crops (maize, leafy vegetables, winter cereals) a range of rainfall / application timing conditions Substance 1 DT50 = 150, Koc = 10 Substance 2 DT50 = 150, Koc = 100 Substance 3 DT50 = 150, Koc = 1000 Spring application maize, R1 R4 maize, R1 R4 maize, R1 R4 Summer application vegetables, leafy (early, late), R1 R4, vegetables, leafy (early, late), R1 R4, vegetables, leafy (early, late), R1 R4, Autumn application winter cereals, R1, R3, R4 winter cereals, R1, R3, R4 winter cereals, R1, R3, R4 For each test case the impact of a 5, 10 and 20 m VFS was investigated Test comprises performance assessment for a total of over 6,100 run-off events.
26 Performance Pesticide Reduction Reduction Effectiveness (%) 5 m VFS 10 m VFS 20 m VFS Minimum th Percentile Median n = 6,141
27 Performance Scenario Comparison Illustrative comparison for 10 m VFS based upon simulations featuring all R scenarios; Leafy vegetables (early and late) Substance 1 Increasing vulnerability as follows: R2 < R1 < R4 < R3 Reduction Effectiveness (%) R1 R2 R3 R4 Minimum th Percentile ? Median
28 Performance Crop and Timing Comparison Illustrative comparison for 10 m VFS based upon relatively vulnerable combination; Substance 1 (Kfoc = 10 L/kg) R3 scenario Similar responses between crops/timings Do not over-interpret results Run-off is event driven and weather conditions in each simulation are not directly comparable! Winter cereals (n=30 events) Maize (n=42 events) Leafy vegetables (n=49 events) Winter cereals Reduction Effectiveness (%) Leafy vegetables Maize (early) Leafy vegetables (late) Minimum th Percentile Median
29 Comparison with Current Regulatory Defaults FOCUS L&M Working Group recommend the following representation for VFS mitigation effectiveness;
30 Comparison with Current Regulatory Defaults Defaults are based upon 90 th percentile(worstcase) observations in database of run-off studies as follows;
31 Comparison with Current Regulatory Defaults VFSMod test simulations are not directly comparable to the studies employed as a basis for these defaults Different soils (infiltration and antecedent moisture conditions) Different precipitation / run-on conditions Different vulnerabilities to run-off vs erosion Pragmatic assignment of values from limited database
32 Comparison Pesticide Reduction (10 m VFS) VFSMod (R1- R4) Reduction Effectiveness (%) FOCUS L&M (aqueous) FOCUS L&M (Sediment) FOCUS Defaults (10 th Percentile) Minimum th Percentile Median
33 Comparison Pesticide Reduction (20 m VFS) VFSMod (R1- R4) Reduction Effectiveness (%) FOCUS L&M (aqueous) FOCUS L&M (Sediment) FOCUS Defaults (10 th Percentile) Minimum th Percentile Median
34 Next Step: Linking Risk Management Runoff Mitigation Measures Use in-field buffers Position buffers to break up long/steep slopes Stopping and infiltrating water at source Establish talweg buffers Position buffer in areas of concentrated runoff formation Avoiding runoff in talweg positions Use riparian buffers Position buffers alongside water bodies Stopping runoff before entering ditches/streams/lakes Use edge-of-field buffers Position buffer at downslope field edge Stopping runoff from exiting field Manage field access areas Vegetate field access areas Stopping formation of linear runoff towards roads Establish hedges Position at downslope edge of field Stopping runoff from exiting field; providing wind shield and biodiversity benefits Establish/maintain woodlands Position at downslope/riparian landscape position Stopping runoff in landscape; providing wind shield and biodiversity benefits
35 Runoff Mitigation Measures Toolbox for Flexible Mitigation Mitigation measure toolbox: Soil management Cropping practices Vegetative buffers Reduce tillage intensity Manage tramlines Prepare rough seedbed Establish in-field bunds Use Crop rotation Do strip cropping Use in-field buffers Establish talweg buffers Use riparian buffers Use edge-of-field buffers Manage surface soil compaction Manage subsoil compaction Do contour tilling/disking Use annual cover crops Use perennial cover crops Manage field access areas Establish hedges Establish/maintain woodlands Retention structures Use edge-of-field bunds Establish Retention ponds/artificial Establish vegetated ditches wetlands Adapted use of pesticides Adapt application timing Optimize seasonal timing Adapt product and rate selection Optimized irrigation Adapt irrigation technique Optimize irrigation timing and rate
36 Publications: Fox et al. (2010). Influence of flow concentration on input factor importance and uncertainty in predicting pesticide surface runoff reduction by vegetative filter strips. Journal of Hydrology 384: doi: /j.jhydrol Jones et al. (2010). Modeling the Removal of Pesticides in Runoff by Vegetative Buffer Strips. Paper EC04C-4 presented at the SETAC Europe 20th Annual Meeting May 2010, Seville, Spain. Muñoz-Carpena et al. (2010). Parameter importance and uncertainty in predicting runoff pesticide reduction with filter strips. J. Environ. Qual. 39(1):1-12 Poletika et al. (2009). Chlorpyrifos and atrazine removal from runoff by vegetated filter strips: experiments and predictive modeling. Journal of Environmental Quality, 38 (3) Roepke et al. (2009): Modeling runoff mitigation capability of vegetated filter strips. Poster presentation at the Pesticide Behaviour in Soils, Water and Air Symposium; September; York, UK. Sabbagh et al. (2009). Effectiveness of vegetative filter strips in reducing pesticide loading: Quantifying pesticide trapping efficiency. Journal of Environmental Quality, 38 (2) Winchell & Estes (2009). A Review of Simulation Models for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Buffers in Reducing Pesticide Exposure. US EPA MRID No Paetzold study / Germany
37 Resources and SWAN Distribution VFSMOD Documentation VFSMOD Publications EU VFSMOD Scenario Development Report (Brown et al, 2012) + SWAN Software download (November 2012) Note: This site will be the official source for SWAN distribution! Updates will be posted here instead of the current distribution.
38 With thanks to the co-authors Matteo Balderacchi Marco Trevisan Ettore Capri Colin Brown Bjoern Roepke, Horatio Meyer Neil Mackay Beate Erzgraeber Mark Greener Denis Yon Wendy van Beinum Sabine Beulke Rafael Muñoz-Carpena
Modelling the fate of pesticides in vegetated filter strips using VFSMOD-W. Colin Brown University of York
Modelling the fate of pesticides in vegetated filter strips using VFSMOD-W Colin Brown University of York Piacenza, 30 th August - 1 st September 2011 Overview Including risk mitigation into risk assessment
More informationRefinement of the FOCUS Stream Scenario
Refinement of the FOCUS Stream Scenario Mark Russell Third European Modelling Workshop Catania, Italy February 17-19, 2004 Sequential steps for FOCUS surface water models Type of Exposure Estimate Step
More informationComparison of Models for Estimating the Removal of Pesticides by Vegetated Filter Strips
Chapter 17 Downloaded via NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on October 11, 2018 at 11:47:35 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles. Comparison
More informationBUVARD: an online tool to design vegetative buffer zones in a french context
BUVARD: an online tool to design vegetative buffer zones in a french context Claire Lauvernet, Clotaire Catalogne, Etienne Leblois, Nadia Carluer Irstea. Non point source pollutions team www.irstea.fr
More informationEffects of Input Uncertainty on VFSMOD Modeling of Water, Sediment, and Pesticide Trapping by Vegetative Filter Strips
Effects of Input Uncertainty on VFSMOD Modeling of Water, Sediment, and Pesticide Trapping by Vegetative Filter Strips Solomon M. Folle 1, Michael F. Winchell 1, Tammara L. Estes 1, Katie Budreski 1, John
More informationEnvironmental modelling and validation
Environmental modelling and validation Colin Brown University of York, UK 2 nd SETAC Europe Special Science Symposium Overview Predicted environmental concentrations Models, validation and goodness-of-fit
More informationMitigation Measures for Runoff
Mitigation Measures for Runoff Basic mitigation options In field measures Out of field measures Catchment: Investigation area to understand water transfer and implement suitable mitigation plan Scale to
More informationDesign Guide for Vegetative Filter Strips Using VFSMOD
Paper No. 99-2147 An ASAE Meeting Presentation Design Guide for Vegetative Filter Strips Using VFSMOD By Librianto Suwandono John E. Parsons Rafael Muñoz-Carpena Graduate Student Associate Professor Researcher
More informationPest Management Regulatory Agency: Aquatic exposure modelling for exposure assessment in support of the regulation of pest control products in Canada
Pest Management Regulatory Agency: Aquatic exposure modelling for exposure assessment in support of the regulation of pest control products in Canada 242nd ACS National Meeting August 28, 2011 Greg Malis,
More informationBest practices to minimize runoff pollution
Best practices to minimize runoff pollution Prof. Dr. Emilio J. González-Sánchez University of Cordoba, Spain emilio.gonzalez@uco.es www.uco.es/cemtro Surface runoff occurs when there is more water than
More informationNational exposure assessment for the authorization of plant protection products (PPP) in Austria:
National exposure assessment for the authorization of plant protection products (PPP) in Austria: Calculation of predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) in soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment
More informationSite- and use-specific risk assessment for diffuse-source pesticide inputs into German surface waters
4th European Modelling Workshop, 21-22 Nov 2005, Paris Site- and use-specific risk assessment for diffuse-source pesticide inputs into German surface waters as part of the Information System on Integrated
More informationExposure assessment for pesticide inputs into surface waters via surface runoff, erosion and drainage in Germany (GERDA)
Exposure assessment for pesticide inputs into surface waters via surface runoff, erosion and drainage in Germany (GERDA) Martin Bach 1, Dietlinde Großmann 2, Djamal Guerniche 3, Udo Hommen 4, Michael Klein
More informationExamination of PRZM5.0 Storm Rainfall Depth and Distribution Algorithms Compared to Current U.S. Storm Trends
Examination of PRZM5.0 Storm Rainfall Depth and Distribution Algorithms Compared to Current U.S. Storm Trends August 24, 2016 Tammara L. Estes (Stone Environmental Inc.) Kevin L. Armbrust, Ph.D. (Louisiana
More informationFOOTPRINT. Mitigation strategies to reduce pesticide inputs into groundand surface water and their effectiveness a state-of-the-art review
FOOTPRINT Mitigation strategies to reduce pesticide inputs into groundand surface water and their effectiveness a state-of-the-art review S. Reichenberger, M. Bach, A. Skitschak, H.-G. Frede Institute
More informationBAEN 673 / February 18, 2016 Hydrologic Processes
BAEN 673 / February 18, 2016 Hydrologic Processes Assignment: HW#7 Next class lecture in AEPM 104 Today s topics SWAT exercise #2 The SWAT model review paper Hydrologic processes The Hydrologic Processes
More informationDegradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation. Water quality Sediment Nutrients
Near Blue River ca. 1980 Degradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation Water quality Sediment Nutrients Program cost Cheaper to prevent Still expensive Long-term productivity
More informationGreenPlan Modeling Tool User Guidance
GreenPlan Modeling Tool User Guidance Prepared by SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE 4911 Central Avenue, Richmond, CA 94804 Phone: 510-746-7334 (SFEI) Fax: 510-746-7300 www.sfei.org Table of Contents 1.
More informationMitigation of runoff in the FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios
Mitigation of runoff in the FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios Note of the fate group of the Environmental Risk Assessment team of Alterra on the interpretation of the mitigation of runoff in the FOCUS Landscape
More informationThe Development and Status of the FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios. FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios within Directive 91/414/EEC
The Development and Status of the within Directive 91/414/EEC Jan Linders on behalf of the FOCUS working group on Surface Water Scenarios, RIVM-CSR, Bilthoven, NL, presented at SETAC2001, Madrid 23-4-01
More informationRisk Mitigation Groundwater & Drainage
Risk Mitigation Groundwater & Drainage Gerhard Goerlitz 1, Colin Brown 2 1 Bayer CropScience AG, Monheim, Gemany 2 University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom SETAC Europe 12 th Special Science Symposium
More informationChris Lythgo Environment Branch (Fate and Behaviour)
Assessments of Leaching to Groundwater in the UK Chris Lythgo Environment Branch (Fate and Behaviour) Overview UK groundwater scenarios How were scenarios selected? When Is Macropore flow modelling required?
More informationAnnAGNPS. Annualized AGricultural Non-Point Source Pollurant Loading Model. Annualized Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollutant Loading Model
AnnAGNPS Annualized AGricultural Non-Point Source Pollurant Loading Model 1 Erosion Erosion can be expresed as: E=f(C, S, T, SS, M) E = erosion C = climate S = soil properties T = topography SS = soil
More informationA Comparison of Observed Pesticide Concentrations in Groundwater with Predictions by US Regulatory Models Used in Human Health Risk Assessments
A Comparison of Observed Pesticide Concentrations in Groundwater with Predictions by US Regulatory Models Used in Human Health Risk Assessments Presented by: Michael Winchell 1, Tammara Estes 1, Scott
More informationNew Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University
New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University Situation Increasing concern for local and regional waters Substantial demand for
More informationPesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Waveney catchment. March developed by:
Pesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Waveney catchment March 2007 developed by: using technology Executive summary Areas with high vulnerability to Chlorotoluron and IPU entering streams
More informationRefined Application of the SWAT Model for Endangered Species Effects Determination
Refined Application of the SWAT Model for Endangered Species Effects Determination Michael Winchell 1, Solomon Folle 2, Roger Breton 3 1. Stone Environmental Inc., Montpelier, Vermont 2. University of
More informationWater balance in soil
Technische Universität München Water balance Water balance in soil Arno Rein Infiltration = + precipitation P evapotranspiration ET surface runoff Summer course Modeling of Plant Uptake, DTU Wednesday,
More informationGeneric guidance for FOCUS surface water Scenarios
Version: 1.4 Date: May 215 Generic guidance for FOCUS surface water Scenarios About this document The report on which this document is based is that of the FOCUS Surface water Scenarios workgroup, which
More informationVariations on a Theme, Groundwater Sensitivity
Variations on a Theme, Groundwater Sensitivity Amy Ritter, Waterborne Environmental, Inc. Mark Cheplick, Waterborne Environmental, Inc. Isha Khanijo, Waterborne Environmental, Inc. American Chemical Society,
More informationPesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Yorkshire Ouse catchment. March developed by:
Pesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Yorkshire Ouse catchment March 2007 developed by: using technology Executive summary Soils in high risk areas throughout the catchment are slowly permeable,
More informationPesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Wensum catchment. March developed by:
Pesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Wensum catchment March 2007 developed by: using technology Executive summary Areas with high vulnerability of IPU entering streams during peak drainflow
More informationIsacco Luca 1, Ferrari Federico 2, Merli Annalisa 3, Capri Ettore 1, Suciu Nicoleta 1. DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy 2
Higher tier approaches for linking environmental exposure to bioaccumulation in regulatory context: MERLIN-Expo Tool estimations versus Monitoring data Isacco Luca 1, Ferrari Federico 2, Merli Annalisa
More informationWatershed BMPs. Notes from NRCS online site on BMPs. Focus on key BMPs
Notes from NRCS online site on BMPs http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/standards/nhcp.html Focus on key BMPs Function, benefits, and drawbacks listed Definition Novotny & Olem: BMPs are methods and practices
More informationSoil and Water Conservation Research under Intensive Potato Production Systems in New Brunswick
Agri-Food Soil and Water Conservation Research under Intensive Potato Production Systems in New Brunswick T. L. Chow 1, H.W. Rees 1, and J.-L, Daigle 2 Quebec New Brunswick Technical Exchange Workshop
More informationLecture 11: Water Flow; Soils and the Hydrologic Cycle
Lecture 11: Water Flow; Soils and the Hydrologic Cycle Water Flow in Soils Types of Water Flow in Soil Saturated flow: Soil pores completely filled with water; controlled by the hydrostatic potential After
More informationPesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Wyre catchment. March developed by:
Pesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Wyre catchment March 2007 developed by: using technology Executive summary Areas with high vulnerability of Mecoprop_P and MCPA entering streams during
More informationInfluence of scenario assumptions on exposure in FOCUS water bodies, as calculated with TOXSWA. Paulien Adriaanse, Alterra, NL
Influence of scenario assumptions on exposure in FOCUS water bodies, as calculated with TOXSWA Paulien Adriaanse, Alterra, NL Overview Water body types in FOCUS sw scenarios TOXSWA 2.0: What is new? Calculation
More informationFrom the Ground Up- Field Soil Considerations
From the Ground Up- Field Soil Considerations Ted Bilderback Nursery Extension Specialist Department of Horticulture Science North Carolina State University Ted_Bilderback@ncsu.edu http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/nursery/
More informationBest Management Practices to mitigate risk of runoff. a quick start
Best Management Practices to mitigate risk of runoff a quick start Best Management Practices to mitigate risk of runoff a quick start Authors: This document has been edited by A. Ferrero, F. Vidotto and
More informationFOCUS Groundwater - Introduction (Part I)
- Introduction (Part I) Scenarios Workgroup (1,2) Recommend appropriate leaching models Define standard scenarios Develop comparable input parameterisation Define a method of processing the model output
More informationRunoff and erosion risks. Surface water diffuse pollution by PPP: focus on runoff & erosion 30/03/2012. B. Bah, L. Vandendael, R. Oger, A.
04/04/2012 TOPPS-PROWADIS Stakeholder workshop Surface water diffuse pollution by PPP: focus on runoff & erosion B. Bah, L. Vandendael, R. Oger, A. Degré 1 Runoff and erosion risks Erosion Potential effect
More informationBMP Performance under a Changing Climate Evaluating Resilience
BMP Performance under a Changing Climate Evaluating Resilience Monitoring and Assessing Impacts of Changes in Weather Patterns and Extreme Events on BMP Siting and Design Annapolis, MD September 7, 2017
More informationRefined exposure estimation to support an Environmental Assessment for a veterinary medicine
May 25, 2016 Refined exposure estimation to support an Environmental Assessment for a veterinary medicine Christopher Holmes, Isha Khanijo, Joshua Amos and Amy Ritter Waterborne Environmental, Inc. Holly
More informationNUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL
NUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL A Cooperative Project Between Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research (TIAER) USDA NRCS USDA ARS US EPA Funding support for this project was provided in part through a
More informationWhat is a Watershed? Understanding Surface Runoff. Controlling Erosion and Sediment.
What is a Watershed? Understanding Surface Runoff. Controlling Erosion and Sediment. Aleksey Sheshukov Assistant Professor and Water-Quality Specialist Biological & Agricultural Engineering ashesh@ksu.edu,
More informationPesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Teme catchment. March developed by:
Pesticide risk maps for targeting advice activity in Teme catchment March 2007 developed by: using technology Executive summary Areas with high vulnerability of IPU and Mecoprop-P entering streams during
More informationPrecipitation Surface Cover Topography Soil Properties
Precipitation Surface Cover Topography Soil Properties Intrinsic capacity of rainfall to cause erosion Influenced by Amount, intensity, terminal velocity, drop size and drop size distribution of rain.
More informationParameter Importance and Uncertainty in Predicting Runoff Pesticide Reduction with Filter Strips
TECHNICAL REPORTS: TECHNICAL SURFACE REPORTS WATER QUALITY Parameter Importance and Uncertainty in Predicting Runoff Pesticide Reduction with Filter Strips Rafael Muñoz-Carpena* University of Florida Garey
More informationApplication of AnnAGNPS to model an agricultural watershed in East-Central Mississippi for the evaluation of an on-farm water storage (OFWS) system
Application of AnnAGNPS to model an agricultural watershed in East-Central Mississippi for the evaluation of an on-farm water storage (OFWS) system Ritesh Karki a, Mary Love M. Tagert a, Joel O. Paz a,
More informationEstimates of Groundwater Recharge beneath Banksia Woodland on the Swan Coastal Plain Using a Vertical Flux Model (WAVES): Sensitivity Analysis
Estimates of Groundwater Recharge beneath Banksia Woodland on the Swan Coastal Plain Using a Vertical Flux Model (WAVES): Sensitivity Analysis C. Xu a, R.P. Silberstein b and A.D. Barr b a Water Corporation
More informationUtilization of Continuous Water Quality Monitoring for Assessing and Modeling Pollutant Export from Agricultural Catchments
Utilization of Continuous Water Quality Monitoring for Assessing and Modeling Pollutant Export from Agricultural Catchments Colin Ragush Andrew Sinclair, Dale Hebb (AAFC), Dr. Rob Jamieson Water Quality
More informationThe Science of Maryland Agriculture
Edition 3 (2016) GOAL STATEMENT: Students will understand how Maryland farmers and developers can use conservation techniques to reduce environmental damage. OBJECTIVES: Students will identify ways agriculture
More informationAppendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution
Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution Sources Nonpoint source of pollution, unlike pollution from industrial and sewage treatment plants, comes from many different sources. Nonpoint source pollution is
More information1 THE USGS MODULAR MODELING SYSTEM MODEL OF THE UPPER COSUMNES RIVER
1 THE USGS MODULAR MODELING SYSTEM MODEL OF THE UPPER COSUMNES RIVER 1.1 Introduction The Hydrologic Model of the Upper Cosumnes River Basin (HMCRB) under the USGS Modular Modeling System (MMS) uses a
More informationA method to derive crop-specific leaching scenarios
A method to derive crop-specific leaching scenarios Andreas Huber, November 22, 2005 DuPont Crop Protection Bad Homburg EU Modelling Workshop, Paris. 2 Preamble GIS methods can be used to estimate leaching
More informationTier-1 and Tier-2A Scenario Parameterisation and Example Calculations 1
EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2433 SCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA Tier-1 and Tier-2A Scenario Parameterisation and Example Calculations 1 In Support of the Revision of the Guidance Document on Persistence in Soil
More informationStormwater Treatment Wetlands
Florida Chamber Summer School July, 2014 Stormwater Treatment Wetlands Chris Keller, P.E. Wetland Solutions, Inc. Why Wetlands? Wetlands are the natural stormwater management systems in the landscape Wetlands
More informationIntroduction. Rice issues Environmental issues Directive needs Models lacking
Second European Modelling Workshop Pesticides in Groundwater Lisbon, 6-7 June 2002 Modelling Pesticide Leaching and Runoff in Rice Paddies with the RICEWQ+VADOFT Package Ettore Capri Istituto di Chimica
More informationNational Agricultural Pesticide Risk Assessment (NAPRA) Web
The NAPRA Program 1 Acushla Antony 2, Indrajeet Chaubey, Bernard Engel, Natalie Carroll 2 Respectively, Graduate student, Professor, Professor and Head, and Professor, Department of Agricultural and Biological
More informationImplication of soil management on biodiversity: a case study from Italian vineyard
Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche Implication of soil management on biodiversity: a case study from Italian vineyard Workshop on BIODIVERSITY IN AGROECOSYSTEMS Milano, 24-25 February
More informationSimplified Forms of Surface Runoff Estimation Method for Silt- Loam Soils Suat Irmak, Soil and Water Resources and Irrigation Engineer, Professor
EC3016 Index: Crops, Irrigation Engineering Issued April 2017 Simplified Forms of Surface Runoff Estimation Method for Silt- Loam Soils Suat Irmak, Soil and Water Resources and Irrigation Engineer, Professor
More informationBarry M. Evans*, David W. Lehning, Tatiana Borisova, Kenneth J. Corradini, and Scott A. Sheeder.
A GENERIC TOOL FOR EVALUATING THE UTILITY OF SELECTED POLLUTION MITIGATION STRATEGIES WITHIN A WATERSHED Barry M. Evans*, David W. Lehning, Tatiana Borisova, Kenneth J. Corradini, and Scott A. Sheeder.
More informationHistory of Model Development at Temple, Texas. J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold
History of Model Development at Temple, Texas J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold INTRODUCTION Then Model development at Temple A long history (1937-present) Many scientists participating in: Data collection
More informationModels Overview: Purposes and Limitations
Models Overview: Purposes and Limitations Pollutant load originates from: Point-source discharges (NPDES facilities) Info is available on the discharges (DMRs, etc.) Some are steady-flow, others are precip-driven
More informationAAFC and H 2 O. Ian D Campbell. Director, Integrated Natural Resources Agri-Environment Services Branch Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
AAFC and H 2 O Ian D Campbell Director, Integrated Natural Resources Agri-Environment Services Branch Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada AAFC and Water: Outline Role of AAFC in water Irrigation and drainage
More informationBallard Phase I/Retrofit Supplemental Monitoring Plan
MEMORANDUM Ballard Phase I/Retrofit Supplemental Monitoring Plan PREPARED FOR: Seattle Public Utilities PREPARED BY: CH2M HILL DATE: August 17, 2012 Introduction This memo summarizes the plans for and
More informationTMDL and Stormwater Regulations & Policy: Recent Developments and their Implications for MS4 Permit Holders
14 th Annual EPA Region 6 Stormwater Conference 26 June 2012 TMDL and Stormwater Regulations & Policy: Recent Developments and their Implications for MS4 Permit Holders Michael F. Bloom, PE, CFM, BCEE
More informationClimate Simulation Irrigation Winter Processes Surface Hydrology Water Balance & Percolation Subsurface Hydrology Soil Component Plant Growth Residue
Climate Simulation Irrigation Winter Processes Surface Hydrology Water Balance & Percolation Subsurface Hydrology Soil Component Plant Growth Residue Decomposition and Management Overland Flow Hydraulics
More informationEffect of Land Surface on Runoff Generation
Effect of Land Surface on Runoff Generation Context: Hydrologic Cycle Runoff vs Infiltration Infiltration: Process by which water on the ground surface enters the soil Runoff: Water (from rain, snowmelt,
More informationStructure. On-farm risk assessment for pesticides. Aquatic ecosystems in the UK agricultural landscape. Losses in drainflow
Structure On-farm risk assessment for pesticides Losses in drainflow Aquatic ecosystems in the UK agricultural landscape Cranfield Centre for EcoChemistry On-farm risk assessment for pesticides Colin Brown
More informationEstimating Field-Scale Runoff and Sediment Delivery. Seth M. Dabney, USDA-ARS Dalmo A. N. Vieira, USDA-ARS Daniel C. Yoder, Univ.
Estimating Field-Scale Runoff and Sediment Delivery Seth M. Dabney, USDA-ARS Dalmo A. N. Vieira, USDA-ARS Daniel C. Yoder, Univ. of Tennessee Organization Buffers for concentrated flow control Distributed
More informationBest Management Practices for Agricultural Pesticide Runoff. Part II. Aniela Burant, PhD. March 20, 2018
Best Management Practices for Agricultural Pesticide Runoff. Part II. Aniela Burant, PhD. March 20, 2018 Mitigation PEST Integrated Pest Management PESTICIDE Label evaluation Pesticide selection Label
More informationL-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University Great Lakes Sedimentation Workshop Ann Arbor Mi. L-THIA On-line watershed delineation
More informationSoil and farm practices data concerning the case study Svratka were collected according to questionnaire 1 by the expert on soil protection.
Soil and farm practices data concerning the case study Svratka were collected according to questionnaire 1 by the expert on soil protection. Farmers in the case study region were interviewed according
More informationAppendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions
Appendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions A pollutant loading is a quantifiable amount of pollution that is being delivered to a water body. Pollutant load reductions can be calculated based
More informationHydrological Threats to Ecosystem Services Provided by USDA Forest Service
Hydrological Threats to Ecosystem Services Provided by USDA Forest Service Yongqiang Liu Center for Forest Disturbance Science USDA Forest Service, Athens, GA, USA International Symposium on Synergistic
More informationThe Blueprint and Council Conclusions:
The Blueprint and Council Conclusions: Essential to address the challenges that threaten the water ecosystems and their services on which society depends Proposed solutions include assessment of the costs
More informationWASA Quiz Review. Chapter 2
WASA Quiz Review Chapter 2 Question#1 What is surface runoff? part of the water cycle that flows over land as surface water instead of being absorbed into groundwater or evaporating Question #2 What are
More informationProceedings and Outputs of GEWEX International Symposium on Global Land-surface Evaporation and Climate
Proceedings and Outputs of GEWEX International Symposium on Global Land-surface Evaporation and Climate 13-14 July, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH), Wallingford, UK Summary For humankind to effectively
More informationNutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance
Nutrient Management in Developing and Agricultural Areas A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance Chris Meehan, P.E. May 25, 2011 Agenda Physical Improvements Planning Improvements How to get it
More informationWater Quality Ecosystem Services in the Urban Environment
Water Quality Ecosystem Services in the Urban Environment Dianna Hogan and JV Loperfido ACES 2010 December 7, 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Quality Ecosystem Services
More informationSediment and Erosion Control Plan (SECP) Template
Sediment and Erosion Control Plan (SECP) Template Member Name: 1. General Information: Provide the required information where indicated. Parcel (APN) Field ID(s) General Information Comments: Name of Person
More informationSaturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS
Saturated Buffer To intercept tile drainage prior to discharging to surface waters and redistribute the water laterally in the soil profile of the streamside buffer. Subsurface drainage, also known as
More informationThe Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control
The Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control Presented at the Tennessee Gas Association Conference April 23, 2008 More than thirty years ago, two-third of the nation's
More informationRisk assessment for mixtures of agricultural chemicals in surface water; a SETAC Pellston workshop update
Risk assessment for mixtures of agricultural chemicals in surface water; a SETAC Pellston workshop update Christopher Holmes, Waterborne Environmental, Inc., VA, USA Mick Hamer, Syngenta, Bracknell, UK
More informationNRCS s Soil Health Initiative and its Relationship to Water Quality
NRCS s Soil Health Initiative and its Relationship to Water Quality Kip Potter, NRCS, Vermont United States Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The NRCS Soil Health
More informationGLASI GLASI. Priority Subwatershed Project. Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative
GLASI GLASI Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative Priority Subwatershed Project Wigle Creek Priority Subwatershed Project Essex Region Conservation Authority Up to $75,000 per eligible farm business
More informationConservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.
Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health. Sediment Conservation Cover Cover Crop Critical Area Planting Field
More informationCHECKLIST FORM FOR ASSESSING GRAZING OPERATIONS
CDQAP - RB2 Conditional Waiver Reference Binder Tab 8.1 May, 2017 CDQAP 2017 CHECKLIST FORM FOR ASSESSING GRAZING OPERATIONS Date: Name of Person Completing checklist: Facility Information Facility Name:
More informationIndividual NWRM. Strip cropping along contours
Individual NWRM Strip cropping along contours This report was prepared by the NWRM project, led by Office International de l Eau (OIEau), in consortium with Actéon Environment (France), AMEC Foster Wheeler
More informationNutrient Management Concept to Implementation
Natural Resources Conservation Service Nutrient Management Concept to Implementation Terrell Erickson Director, Ecological Sciences Division NRCS National Headquarters Why Nutrient Management Budget and
More informationStudy Questions Exam 5
Study Questions Exam 5 1. List three best management practices intended to reduce the loss of nutrients from agroecosystems. No problem. 2. Explain how buffer strips work. Runoff enters at higher velocity,
More informationNCHRP Project Long Term Performance and Life Cycle Costs of Stormwater Best Management Practices
NCHRP Project 25-40 Long Term Performance and Life Cycle Costs of Stormwater Best Management Practices 2014 National Stormwater Practitioners Meeting Nick Tiedeken Minnesota DOT (MnDOT) Need for Inspection
More informationThe Texas A&M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory (HMI) Questionnaire
The Texas A&M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory (HMI) Questionnaire May 4, 2010 Name of Model, Date, Version Number Dynamic Watershed Simulation Model (DWSM) 2002
More informationMODELLING SURFACE RUNOFF TO MITIGATE HARMFUL IMPACT OF SOIL EROSION
MODELLING SURFACE RUNOFF TO MITIGATE HARMFUL IMPACT OF SOIL EROSION Pavel KOVAR, Darina VASSOVA Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague HydroPredict Conference 2010 Prague,
More informationThanks to Bill Elliot, Research Leader U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service
Thanks to Bill Elliot, Research Leader U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service To present an overview Forest Soil Erosion Processes 2 Precipitation or melting snow Evapotranspiration Infiltration
More informationAssessing the efficacy of pesticide placement strategies with a novel approach to fate modelling
International Conference on Pesticide Behaviour in Soils, Water and Air, York, UK; 1st Sep. 2017 Assessing the efficacy of pesticide placement strategies with a novel approach to fate modelling Annika
More informationA long-term field experiment: Effect of buffer strips on erosion and nutrient losses in boreal conditions
A long-term field experiment: Effect of buffer strips on erosion and nutrient losses in boreal conditions Jaana Uusi-Kämppä (E-mail: jaana.uusi-kamppa@luke.fi) Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
More informationWorkshops on May 23, 2016 for the
Workshops on May 23, 2016 for the 10 th International Symposium AgroEnviron 2016 and the 7 th International Symposium on Gully Erosion 1. WEPP Model Introduction and Application full day a. Instructors:
More information