Safe Harbor Implications? ERAI Conference April 18 & 19, 2013 Mark Northrup VP Advanced Technical Operations & Strategy

Transcription

1 Safe Harbor Implications? ERAI Conference April 18 & 19, 2013 Mark Northrup VP Advanced Technical Operations & Strategy Military Aerospace Communications Industrial Medical

2 Welcome

3 Buyer A person who buys goods in the usual manner from a person in the business of selling such goods and who does so in good faith and without knowledge that the sale violates another person s ownership rights or security interest in the goods. Such a buyer will have good title to the item purchased.

4 Supplier A party that supplies goods or services. A supplier may be distinguished from a contractor or subcontractor, who commonly adds specialized input to deliverables. Also called a vendor.

5 Customer A person or business that purchases a commodity or service.

6 Escape A fault or defect that escapes detection during the enactment of the activities the test team conducts to detect defects which is discovered subsequently during downstream product use.

7 Attorney A practitioner in a court of law who is legally qualified to prosecute and defend actions in such court on the retainer of clients.

8 Safe Harbor Provision in an agreement, law, or regulation that affords protection from liability or penalty under specified circumstances or if certain conditions are met.

9 Supply Chain Scenarios(OCM) Preferred Industry Practice

10 Supply Chain Scenarios(NOCM) Non - Preferred Industry Practice

11 Customer (DOD)

12 Customized for markets Contract Manufacturer (EMS)

13 Due Diligence

14 Component Supplier IDEA-1010B Certified Approved CCAP-101 Certified Approved SAE AS6081 Certified Approved

15

16

17 Laboratory ISO CCAP SAE AS6171 DLA Risk Mitigation Strategy?

18 Laboratory Staff (Ultrasound) Accreditations?

19 Laboratory Staff( Sonographer ) Certification?

20 Laboratory Staff (Sonographer) Registry?

21 Laboratory(Sonographer) Degree?

22 Laboratory Staff (Radiologist) Certification, Accreditation, Registry?

23 DRTL Overview Dynamic Research and Testing Laboratories (DRTL) Component Risk Mitigation Destructive Physical Analysis Failure Analysis Product Qualifications Material Qualifications Consulting Services ISO Our staff offers highly respected technical expertise, personable service, and quick response.

24 DRTL Organizational Chart Jodi Wahl (Marketing Coordinator) Holly Connelly (Administrative Specialist) Mark Northrup (Director of Laboratory) Clifton Aldridge (Laboratory Manager) Teri Kovaleski (Human Resources) Chris Hoover (Quality Assurance) Christine Glomski (Internal Auditor) Karin Zimmerer (Document Control)

25 DRTL Organizational Chart Rachel Garcia (Device Analyst II) James Taylor (Failure Analysis Engineer) Mark Northrup (Director of Laboratory) Clifton Aldridge (Laboratory Manager) Tony James (Failure Analysis Engineer) JR Lucero (Device Technician) Robert Perea (Device Technician) Nabahe Bo Tewawina (Device Technician)

26 SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

27 SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

28 Supply Chain Scenarios(NOCM) Escape

29 Examples of Escapes? 100% Parts Testing IDEA B CCAP- 101 (electrically) SAE AS6081(comprehensive) Electrical Functional Testing IDEA B CCAP -101 (Yes ) SAE AS6081 (comprehensive) Embedded Software IDEA B CCAP 101 SAE AS6081 OCM Verification Closed Refuses Traceability

30 What are the chances of catching an escape? 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% Probability of catching a sub-standard or counterfeit part should one exist Low Medium High Economics surrounding this level of avoidance may not be warranted Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

31 Safe Harbor Provision in an agreement, law, or regulation that affords protection from liability or penalty under specified circumstances or if certain conditions are met(e.g., Government Furnished Part )

32 Questions for Thought? Do you have an attourney? Who is at fault ( e.g., DOD, CM, Buyer, Laboratory, Accreditation Body, )? Everybody but the DOD is at fault when using industry non-preferred NOCM? Why risk being bit by NOCM? Stop using and/or selling NOCM? Safe Harbor Implications via NDAA Section 818(e.g., government procured parts)? What action of recourse even if due diligence? Recommendations?

33 Thank you!