Does the Work Package Plan include the relevant items as stated in the WPP template? Is the information presented in the same order as the template?

Transcription

1 Work Package title and reference Project title and reference Format Y/N/na Does the Work Package Plan include the relevant items as stated in the WPP template? Is the information presented in the same order as the template? Front Page Has the Principal Contractor been identified? Has the responsible contractor been identified? Does this work package need to be signed and accepted by Network Rail? Has this work package been signed by the appropriate Network Rail Project Manager? Is the title and reference correct? Is the location description sufficient? Is the described programme date(s) and estimated duration sufficient? A1 Description of Work Does the Work Package Plan adequately describe and list the tasks in sequence? Is the description adequate to allow the manager to execute the work described in this Work Package Plan safely? Is it clear how work will be authorised to start? Is it clear how shift handovers will be managed? Once the work is completed or suspended, is the description of what needs to be done sufficiently detailed? (Including housekeeping, waste disposal, security arrangements etc.) Is it clear how a new task could be either added or deleted to / from the Work Package Plan? Is it clear what to do if either minor or major changes need to be made to the work method? A2 Control of Activity Risks Has an activity risk matrix been included? Have all the tasks within the work package been listed in the columns clearly? (Not just reference numbers). Have the significant activity risks been identified for all the tasks listed? (If 'No', what should be added?). Have the risk control measures been adequately described in a manner which is suitable for the person preparing the Task Briefing Sheet to understand? Do all the risks listed relate just to activities? (No site risks included, activity risks are those where the control measures are created by the activity. If 'No', what should be removed?). Have the risks been identified as relevant to the tasks by a 'cross' or 'check mark'? RS-F WPP Check List Rev: 1 Date of issue: Page 1 of 5

2 A3 Resources Have the following been adequately described: Manpower Plant and machinery Tools, scaffolding and lighting etc. Has the personal protective equipment relevant to particular tasks with particular reference to special requirements been included? (Not just general PPE required for all tasks - If 'No', what should be added?). Resource arrangements for special situations such as shift handover or temporary works Is it clear how additional resources may be assigned if necessary? A4 Permits / Plans Have all relevant permits / plans been identified for all tasks that require them? If lifting is involved is the lifting plan referenced adequately and identified in the risk matrix? B Site Details B1 Access For all the locations and tasks, has the Work Package Plan identified all the necessary access points for: Staff Machines / Plant Materials Is there an adequate description for the access points to be identified for planning purposes? Has the way in which materials and resources will be transferred from the access point to the site of work been adequately described? B2 Site Layout Have all the site locations for this Work Package been adequately described for this stage in planning? Are grid references included? Are the layout and limits of the worksite(s) clear? Are any site diagrams or plans included adequate and of value? B3 Control of Site Risks Have the significant site risks been identified for the tasks listed in the matrix columns? Have the risk control measures been adequately described in a manner which is suitable for the person preparing the Task Briefing Sheets? Do all the risks listed relate just to the site? (No activity risks included, site risks are those where the control measures are created by the location of the work e.g. if an excavator is working where there is a steep embankment then the control measures RS-F WPP Check List Rev: 1 Date of issue: Page 2 of 5

3 need to protect the excavator from the site risk. If 'No', then what should be moved?) Have the risks been identified as relevant to the tasks by a cross or other kind of check mark? (If descriptions or anything other than check marks have been added in the task group columns, then this should be brought to the attention of the author as being incorrect.) Have all the significant site risks been identified for all the tasks listed? (If 'No', what should be added?). If engineering trains and on track plant are to be used, have the protection arrangements from the risks of these to others been adequately identified? B4 Protection and Isolation Has the need for protection from trains adequately been identified? Have the open line/ safe system of working been identified correctly? Has the planned protection arrangements been adequately described for each of the activities listed in the Work Package Plans? (It is not necessary to list the exact details but to describe the intended protection regime.) Has any further information been included, such as a line diagram, showing protection arrangements Is the need for any traction current electrical isolation adequately identified B5 On-Track Plant and Machinery Movements If on-track plant is to be used has the number, capability and type of machines required for each task, been clearly identified to allow proper planning and resourcing? If machines have to travel some distance to and from a worksite, has the method of transit been addressed? If additional information is required, such as cant, curvature or gradient data, has it been adequately identified or included? B6 Communication and Contact Details Is there a project organisation chart? Have the site personnel contact details been included in this Work Package Plan? Are the supervisory and off site contact details adequate? If protection is required, has the requirement for ES, PICOP and COSS etc. been identified adequately? Has the Network Rail AMCC contact number been supplied? Is there a contact number for each of the contractor companies? Have any relevant utility company contact numbers been included? (E.g. Electricity, Gas and Water etc?) Have any relevant government agency numbers been included? (E.g. Environment, BTP, HMRI etc.) B7 Emergency Arrangements Have all appropriate emergencies and contingencies been identified? Is there an adequate description of what to do in the case of each emergency identified? Have the necessary contact numbers been listed clearly? RS-F WPP Check List Rev: 1 Date of issue: Page 3 of 5

4 Have the first aid arrangements been identified and described adequately including the provision of equipment and trained personnel? Have the access points that are suitable for an ambulance been identified? Is it clear that grid references are required for access points? Has the location and details of the nearest hospital with an accident and emergency department been identified for the locations listed? B8 Welfare Have the intended toilet, washing and messing facilities been adequately described to allow for proper planning? B9 Interfaces Have all the necessary interfaces with public, environment and all work near the site been identified such as, but not limited to: Public? Other work? Environment, such as noise restrictions and adequate waste disposal arrangements? If the works will affect road traffic, have the planned arangements and constraints been adequately described to protect the public? C Briefing C1 Briefing Arrangements Has the responsibility for briefing each task been identified and assigned? (Not necessary to name individuals at this stage.) Is it clear how and when briefings will be carried out? Comments RS-F WPP Check List Rev: 1 Date of issue: Page 4 of 5

5 Details of Check Name of person completing checklist: Position: Signature: Date: Resulting Actions From WPP Sheet Check Issue / Concern / Clarification Required Date: Name RS-F WPP Check List Rev: 1 Date of issue: Page 5 of 5