Havenbeheer Terminal The new In & Out-gate Concept and Competitive environment

Transcription

1 Havenbeheer Terminal The new In & Out-gate Concept and Competitive environment

2 Port Terminal; former situation In-gate

3 Terminal; current situation In-gate Container moves thru gate

4 Terminal; proposed situation Common In-gate truckscale Cont. scan 20 portcabine

5 1. Lightpole 2. Unpinning area 3. Speedbump 4. Electronic barrier 5. Crossmark 6. Barrier 7. Stop sign 8. Raised platform/fundament 9. Porto cabine/ingate 10.Walkway 11.Scanner 12. Truckscale Terminal; Common In-gate overview

6 Terminal; In-gate main activities Security control (Port owner) Customs control / inspection Interchange of container (from customer to terminal operator) Placing of RIFD seal (new activity) Weighing of container (export- VGM) Administrative tasks (EDI messages etc.) Note: ETV s (external transport vehicles) may carry: Full containers (export) Empty (MT) containers (for either mt backloading or assigned for export) MT chassis for collecting full, MT container units or breakbulk cargo

7 Process flow

8 Process flow

9 In-gate requirements 1.Porto camp (20 ): - Relocation porto cabin (1 ITV + mafi trailer/ Stacker) estimate time ± 1 hour) - Alternative to purchase new unit (20 ) : 2. Purchase truck scale (60 ton) pit type: - Truck scale (2x) 60 ton: - Civil works : Done by a contractor (2x) : 3. Purchase container scanner: - Container scanner (2x): - Civil works : Done by a contractor (2x) : 4. Organize electrical & water supply to cabin, scanner & truck scale - Electrical & water supply cabin: - Electrical & water supply scanner: Done by contractor - Electrical & water supply truck scale:

10 In-gate requirements 5. Purchase electronic crossing beams (barriers) : - Electronic crossing beams (barriers) : - Civil works : Done by contractor : 6. Paint zones (walkway s and locking/unlocking)

11 Proposed situation Out-gate

12 Out-gate main activities Weighing of ETV with MT chassis Interchange of container (from Terminal Operator to customer) Checking of seal (company and/or Customs seal) Administrative tasks Customs control (may demand scanning of full container) Security control (Port owner)

13 Terminal: In-gate/out-gate requirements Item (description Cost (option 1) Cost (option 2) Relocation porto cabin $ purchase new unit (20 ) $ 30, Truck scale (2x) 60 ton $ 90, $ 90, Civil works for truck scale $ 11, $ 11, Container scanner $ 2,000, $ 2,000, Civil works for Container scanner $ 37, $ 37, Electrical & water supply cabin $ 1, $ 1, Electrical & water supply scanner $ 2, $ 2, Electrical & water supply truck scale $ 1, $ 1, Electronic crossing beams (barriers) $ 30, $ 30, Civil works for crossing beams $ 3, $ 3, Paint zones (walkway s and locking/unlocking) $ 6, $ 6, Total cost $ 2,184, $ 2,213, Depreciation years 5 5 Depreciation cost p/year $ 436, $ 442, Average full TEU s handled p/year Depreciation cost p/teu $ 5.45 $ 5.53 Unforeseen expense 20% $ 1.09 $ 1.11 Total p/teu $ 6.55 $ 6.64

14 Out-gate requirements 1. Purchase porto cabine 2. Purchase truckscale, pit type 3. Purchase electronic crossing beams (barriers) 4. Paint zones (walkway s and locking/unlocking)

15 New In & Out gate concept Advantages Service level & Quality upgrading Efficiency Improved Safety Improved Security control Cost effective- especially for Port Management & Customs (savings on manpower & assets)

16 New In- and Out-gate Terms of reference Cooperation (MOU) between: Terminal Operators (TO) and Port Authority / landlord Customs (Financial funding (budget) and Civil works)

17 More than a perfect alternative - Shipping Lines are becoming fewer mega lines. - CMA acquired APL - Hapag and UASC potential merger - Maersk acquired Hamburg Sud - Cosco and China Shipping merged - Hanjin went bankrupt, Yang Ming and HMM struggling financially - Shipping Lines are consolidating to become Mega Alliances - 2M (MSC/ML) - CCEO (CMA/UASC/COSCO/OOCL/EVERGREEN) *Potentially future alliance structure - G6 future uncertain - Most Mega Alliances/Lines have selected their Caribbean HUB - 2M, Freeport - O3, Kingston - HS, Cartagena - HL, Cartagena The ever changing shipping line constellation 17

18 More than a perfect alternative The competitive environment - Lines move aggressively into the terminal business, competing directly with our interests (line control strategy): - Maersk/APMT (Callao, Santos, Buenos Aires) - MSC/TIL (Buenos Aires, Santos, Callao, Caucedo) - CMA CGM/Terminal Link-CMA Terminals (Caucedo) - Regional players have vested interests in terminals (HSUD/ Maersk / Cartagena) - Even small locations compete via cargo control strategies (E.G. Surinam competitor with agency and forwarding company in Miami, also Haina vs Caucedo). 18

19 More than a perfect alternative Local effect on Suriname From global prospective we see local alliances: - El Dorado Service (CMA CGM/ZIM) - Sealand Services (Maersk/Sealand) - Caribbean Feeder Services (Seaboard/HAPAG/ future COSCO, KOS and Crowley) 19

20 More than a perfect alternative Local effect on Suriname EL DORADO Weekly, direct and fast dedicated service to Suriname and Guyana 20

21 More than a perfect alternative Consequences for our Port 1. Less ship movements, which mean less revenue for authorities 2. Privatization of the terminal operator (disconnection of agents and terminal operator) 3. Scaling up of vessels, by combining volumes (costs and benefits) 4. Require Smart logistics concepts (logistic service center and extended gate) 5. Berthing windows will be even more important 6. Productivity and services in general will need to be improved 7. Negotiations to promote efficiency and collaboration (port operators) 8. Renewal and or adjustments of risk assessments 21

22 Competitiveness and Security goes hand in hand Accommodating our future, now Thank You